Severe male factor in in vitro fertilization: definition, prevalence, and treatment. An update : Asian Journal of Andrology

Secondary Logo

Journal Logo


Severe male factor in in vitro fertilization

definition, prevalence, and treatment. An update

Mazzilli, Rossella1,2; Vaiarelli, Alberto1; Dovere, Lisa1; Cimadomo, Danilo1; Ubaldi, Nicolò3; Ferrero, Susanna1; Rienzi, Laura1; Lombardo, Francesco4; Lenzi, Andrea4; Tournaye, Herman5; Ubaldi, Filippo Maria1,

Author Information
Asian Journal of Andrology 24(2):p 125-134, Mar–Apr 2022. | DOI: 10.4103/aja.aja_53_21
  • Open



Male factor is responsible, at least in part, for about 20%–70% of all the causes of infertility.12 A male reproductive impairment could be due to many different factors affecting sperm production, which can ultimately result in oligozoospermia (sperm concentration lower than 15 × 106 ml−1), asthenozoospermia (sperm total motility lower than 40% or progressive motility lower than 32%), teratozoospermia (normal forms lower than 4%), or a combination of these three (oligoasthenoteratozoospermia [OAT]), as indicated by the 2010 World Health Organization reference values.3 Severe male factor (SMF) infertility involves severe oligozoospermia (<5 × 106 sperms per ml of ejaculate), cryptozoospermia (the condition by which spermatozoa cannot be observed in a fresh semen sample, but can be found after centrifugation and microscopic observation of the pellet), or even an absence of spermatozoa in the ejaculate. The latter is defined as azoospermia, a condition affecting 1% of the general male population and up to 10%–15% of the infertile male population.45 Most of the scientific studies investigated the effect of SMF in in vitro fertilization (IVF), unfortunately without considering the female factor. As azoospermic couples acquire earlier in their lives an indication of IVF, they tend to be characterized by a younger female counterpart with a good ovarian reserve. Naturally, lower ovarian reserve and response to the ovarian simulation protocol worsen the IVF outcome, defined as the chance to achieve a live birth per intention to treat.6

This review aims to focus on: (1) definition, prevalence, and causes of SMF infertility; (2) current and emerging therapeutic approaches in IVF; and (3) the impact of SMF on intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcome, including couples presenting a low ovarian reserve and response.


Even if most of the causes of male infertility remain unexplained,7 the main reasons can be grouped as pretesticular, testicular, and posttesticular forms. For a correct diagnosis of azoospermia, semen analysis should be performed according to the 2010 WHO guidelines,3 and at least two samples, obtained more than two weeks apart, should be examined. In addition, azoospermia can be divided into two major categories: nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA; about 60% of the cases) due to either inadequate gonadotropin production (pretesticular) or intrinsic testicular impairment (testicular) and obstructive azoospermia (OA; about 40% of the cases) due to posttesticular causes.89

Pretesticular causes

Pretesticular NOA, defined as secondary testicular failure, may arise from endocrinological alterations of the hypothalamic–pituitary axis with a consequent inhibitory effect on spermatogenesis (genetic or not, congenital or acquired hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, with decreased luteinizing hormone [LH] and follicle-stimulating hormone [FSH] and normal or small testes; Table 1).

Table 1:
Male factor infertility: classification, main causes, and therapeutic approaches


In patients with congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (HH), after excluding other secondary forms, gene mutation screening could be performed. Up to date, 35 genes have been identified (i.e., fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 [FGFR1], fibroblast growth factor 8 [FGF8], SRY-box transcription factor 10 [SOX10], Kallmann syndrome-1 [KAL1], prokineticin 2 [PROK2], kisspeptin [KISS1], and kisspeptin 1 receptor [KISS1R]).10 Interestingly, the most frequent form of HH is represented by Kallmann syndrome.


Acquired causes of HH include pituitary tumors that can cause local destruction of the anterior pituitary, pituitary trauma, and panhypopituitarism.11 Other possible causes of hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal axis dysregulation are anabolic steroid use/abuse12 and androgen resistance.13 Androgen resistance is a rare cause of hypogonadism. It occurs in approximately 1:60 000 births, and more than 300 mutations occurring in the androgen receptor (Xq11–q12) have been described. The clinical manifestations depend on the intensity of the defects.13

Testicular causes

Testicular NOA involves disorders of spermatogenesis within the testes (genetic or not, congenital or acquired hypogonadism with elevated LH or FSH alongside small testes; Table 1).


Genetic causes include chromosomal abnormalities, Y chromosome microdeletions, failure of the primordial germ cells to reach the developing gonads, lack of differentiation of the primordial germ cells to spermatogonia, and male germline mutations affecting spermatogenesis.14151617 Genetic testing is therefore essential to indicate eventual testicular sperm retrieval and avoid unnecessary surgical or medical treatments.18 Of all the genetic causes, chromosomal abnormalities may account for 20% of the male infertility cases. These alterations can be diagnosed in 15% of azoospermic and 5%–7% of oligozoospermic subjects.18 Therefore, it is crucial to perform genetic testing before embarking on an IVF treatment. Moreover, KS is considered the most frequent genetic cause of male infertility, and it is due to the presence of an extra X chromosome (karyotype 47, XXY or other variants). Nevertheless, in these patients, the average successful surgical sperm retrieval rate reaches 50%.19 Y-chromosome microdeletions are also implicated in male fertility since the long and short arms of the Y chromosome (Yq) contain many genes that regulate spermatogenesis and testes’ development. Microdeletions on the long arm of the Yq can be detected in approximately 13% of men with NOA and in <5% of men with severe oligozoospermia.20 Patients with complete azoospermia factor a (AZFa) and b (AZFb) deletions also present having azoospermia with a histological picture of Sertoli cell-only syndrome or spermatogenetic arrest. Conversely, in men carrying AZFc microdeletion, the successful surgical sperm retrieval is about 50%.18 Therefore, gene mutation screening is considered when a specific disease condition is suspected, i.e., monomorphic forms of teratozoospermia (such as macrozoospermia, globozoospermia, and acephalic spermatozoa), asthenozoospermia (such as primary ciliary dyskinesia), and androgen insensitivity syndrome.18

Undescended testis is the most common genital malformation in boys, with a prevalence of 2.7% in male newborns. Cryptorchidism, a condition that is part of the testicular dysgenesis syndrome, may be associated with subfertility, an impaired endocrine axis, and immunologic damage. The prevalence of azoospermia after treating undescended testes is approximately 13% in the unilateral form and 34% in the bilateral one.21


Among the acquired causes of testicular azoospermia, there are:

  1. Testicular torsion,22 trauma, and orchitis, all with the possible complication of testicular atrophy23
  2. Drugs and medications that may impair fertility through different mechanisms such as direct gonadotoxic effects, alteration of the hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal axis, or sexual dysfunction (ejaculation dysfunction and/or reduction in libido).24 Chemotherapy or radiotherapy, for instance, may induce irreversible damage to spermatogenesis252627
  3. Varicocele, which can produce a progressive harmful effect on the testis. Although the broad literature, the exact mechanism by which varicoceles can potentially affect spermatogenesis remains elusive and identifying the individuals that may benefit from surgical treatment of varicocele remains challenging2829
  4. Infections3031 can be another cause of male infertility. For instance, although available data do not support the presence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in plasma seminal fluid of infected subjects,32 in patients who recovered from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), especially in their reproductive age, andrological consultation and evaluation of gonadal function are always suggested33
  5. Autoimmunity (presence of antisperm antibodies)34
  6. Oxidative stress,35 defined as an excess of reactive oxygen species (ROS) or a deficiency of antioxidant particles, could represent a cause of male infertility. The main antioxidants in semen are enzymatic (superoxide dismutase, catalase, and glutathione peroxidase) and non-enzymatic (vitamins A, E, C, and B, coenzyme Q10, and carnitine); nonetheless, the spermatozoa are susceptible to ROS due to the fatty acids in their plasma membrane.3637 A small amount of ROS is required for sperm maturation, acrosome reaction, and capacitation, as well as for sperm–oocyte fusion;38 on the other hand, their excess induces damage through four mechanisms: (1) loss of membrane integrity, (2) reduced sperm motility, (3) sperm DNA damage, and (4) apoptosis.3637 Lastly, the male reproductive hormonal profile might also be altered in case of an excess of ROS39
  7. Conditions involving incomplete or inadequate gonadotropin production and intrinsic testicular impairment are defined as a mixed form (high FSH and normal volume testes, normal FSH and small testes, or normal FSH and normal testis). However, in about 30% of cases, the cause remains idiopathic.34

Posttesticular causes

Finally, posttesticular causes feature normal spermatogenesis and preservation of normal exocrine and endocrine function in association with ductal system alteration or sexual and ejaculatory abnormalities, such as erectile dysfunction or premature ejaculation. In the presence of partial obstruction, severe oligozoospermia or OAT may ensue (Table 1).


Congenital bilateral absence of vas deferens (CBAVD) is found in 1% of infertile men and in up to 6% of those with obstructive azoospermia. Most commonly, CBAVD is due to a mutation of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator (CFTR) gene,404142 where the most frequent mutations are F508del, 5T, and R117H.43 In addition, this disorder may arise from an abnormality in the differentiation of the mesonephric duct.44 Individuals presenting with CBAVD usually have an average standard testis size and well-preserved spermatogenesis. The caput epididymis is always present, but the corpus and the cauda are only occasionally present. Seminal vesicles are often absent or atrophic. In addition, the semen analysis typically demonstrates a low volume of ejaculate with acidic pH.


Acquired causes of OA may include iatrogenic trauma or fibrosis, i.e., postsurgically or postinfectious (orchiepididymitis, prostatitis, or seminal vesiculitis).45 An infrequent cause of vasal obstruction is inadvertent injuries whilst carrying out a hernia repair. This complication most frequently occurs throughout infancy but can also occur after any inguinal procedure. Ejaculatory duct obstruction is another important condition; these patients present with azoospermia with low volume and dilated seminal vesicles. Typically, patients affected by ejaculatory duct obstruction present normal secondary sex characteristics, testis size, and hormonal profiles. Notably, the medical history, physical examination,4647 and hormonal assessment4849 are all required parameters to evaluate azoospermic patients comprehensively.50 The most common cause of iatrogenic obstruction of the vas deferens is bilateral vasectomy performed for elective sterilization.


The individual diagnosis of the underlying causes of infertility is pivotal to plan and implement appropriate and coherent treatment strategies (Table 1). Men with one or more abnormal semen parameters or presumed male infertility should be evaluated by a male reproductive expert (andrologist as well as urologist).51 A complete medical evaluation is always necessary and should include clinical and surgical history, childhood illnesses, genital trauma, medications and allergies, past infections, prior radiation therapy, and/or chemotherapy. Furthermore, a physical examination is essential for the correct evaluation of an azoospermic patient. It is important to screen the male hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal axis by measuring serum testosterone, FSH, and LH levels and essential to detect the majority of clinically significant endocrinopathies. A more comprehensive evaluation includes the dosage of prolactin, thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), and estradiol levels; in case of low total testosterone, free testosterone may be evaluated (through a calculation using sex hormone-binding globulin [SHBG] and albumin).49 The information obtained from a complete endocrine profile may help to elucidate the etiology.

Furthermore, ultrasound is a useful tool in detecting abnormalities related to male infertility, such as testicular volume, vascularization, and structure. In-depth, transrectal ultrasound plays a key role in assessing OA.525354

Karyotype and Y-chromosome microdeletion analysis should be performed in men with primary infertility and azoospermia or severe oligozoospermia with elevated FSH. Furthermore, CFTR mutation carrier testing should be carried out in men with vasal agenesis or idiopathic obstructive azoospermia.

Additionally, patients with increased round cells on semen (>1 × 106 ml−1) and pyospermia should be evaluated for a potential infection.51

Finally, in addition to standard semen analysis, sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) might also be helpful to diagnose male infertility. The tests most commonly performed are the comet assay (single-cell gel electrophoresis), the terminal deoxyuridine nick and labeling assay (TUNEL) test, the sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA), and the sperm chromatin dispersion (SCD) test.5556


Lifestyle changes can be useful in the management of OAT. Indeed, smoking and alcohol consumption, as well as overweight/obesity, are associated with worse semen parameters;50 hence, clinicians may assess these risk factors.51 In addition, infertile men should be soon diagnosed and followed, as they could show an increased chance of morbidity and mortality.57

Medical treatment

Medical treatment comprises hormonal and nonhormonal management.

Hormonal management

Spermatogenesis requires adequate endocrine stimulation. Hormonal treatment using FSH (75–150 IU, three times a week) in association with human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG; 2000 IU one or two times a week) is effective in azoospermic patients with HH.5859 It is controversial to use gonadotropins to increase the function of the hypothalamic–pituitary axis in unexplained male infertility with normal FSH values.

However, a recent position statement60 and guidelines61 suggested using purified or recombinant FSH in normogonadotropic males with idiopathic male factor infertility to improve spontaneous pregnancy rate and ART success in couples with male infertility and to ameliorate sperm chromatin integrity and spermiogenesis. In these cases, the analysis of polymorphisms on the follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR) and follicle-stimulating hormone subunit beta (FSHB) genes could be performed to predict the clinical response to FSH treatment; however, it is currently indicated only for research purposes.60 In case of hypothalamic defects, pulsatile administration of GnRH is possible, but, up to date, it is not recommended. Macroprolactinoma, another treatable form of acquired HH, should be treated with dopamine agonists. Androgens have no role in treating male reproductive dysfunction, and testosterone should not be prescribed,62 while antiestrogens (i.e., clomiphene and tamoxifen citrate), which increase endogenous FSH and LH secretion, represent another possible therapeutic strategy.63

Nonhormonal management

The processes of differentiation and maturation of spermatozoa are highly influenced by external factors, such as ROS, temperature, and lifestyle. Therefore, both nonhormonal medical treatments and food supplements are prevalent in treating male infertility. However, sufficient data confirming the beneficial effects of these drugs have yet to come.964 A position statement suggested the use of antioxidants in patients with idiopathic infertility in the presence of documented abnormal sperm parameters and altered sperm DNA fragmentation.6566 Other clinical conditions that could benefit from medical treatment are infections with antibiotics/anti-inflammatory,3031 autoimmunity with cortisone therapy,34 and sexual and/or ejaculatory dysfunction (i.e., dapoxetine for premature ejaculation, phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors [PDE5is] for erectile dysfunction, and sympathomimetic drugs for retrograde ejaculation).6567

Surgical treatment

Varicocele surgery

Repairing varicocele and the benefits it may offer in improving pregnancy and live birth rates remain uncertain. In fact, even though a significant improvement in sperm concentration, total count, and total motility were observed in several studies,6869 its procedural effect on infertile men undergoing IVF is still debated. Some studies reported no benefit from varicocele repair, while other studies based on microsurgical varicocelectomy showed improved pregnancy and live birth rates after IVF.707172 American Urological Association and American Society for Reproductive Medicine (AUA/ASRM) guidelines suggested surgical varicocelectomy in infertile men with palpable varicocele and abnormal semen parameters; however, azoospermic men are an exception to this statement; these patients should be informed of the absence of definitive evidence supporting varicocele repair improvements on the condition before ART.73

Sperm retrieval techniques

Sperm retrieval techniques are surgical methods that are necessary to obtain spermatozoa from the epididymis and testicles of azoospermic men. Subsequently to these techniques, the retrieved sperm can either be directly used for ICSI or can be cryopreserved.9177374

The method of choice for sperm retrieval is based on the type of azoospermia and the surgeon's experience. The techniques performed are (1) percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration (PESA); (2) testicular fine needle aspiration (FNA); (3) microsurgical epidydimal sperm aspiration (MESA); (4) testicular sperm extraction (TESE); (5) microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE). PESA and FNA are indicated in case of suspected OA, while MESA and TESE/micro-TESE are indicated for both OA and NOA. Infertility secondary to retrograde ejaculation should be treated with sympathomimetics (as described above) and alkalinization of urine, as well as induced ejaculation or surgical sperm retrieval.62 Finally, after vasectomy, either surgical reconstruction or surgical sperm retrieval, or both, are possible options.62

Predictive factors of sperm retrieval in patients with OA and NOA

Spermatozoa can be retrieved either from the epididymis or from the testicles in almost all cases of OA, regardless of the cause of obstruction and the technique used (both aspiration and biopsy). Microsurgical ductal reconstruction has also been proposed as a cost-effective treatment in selected cases of OA (i.e., postvasectomy). Nevertheless, recanalization may not be an available option for some couples, as in cases of congenital obstructions and postinfectious obstruction or failed vasectomy reversals. Unlike men with obstructions, in men with NOA, TESE is the technique of choice. In such cases, spermatogenesis may be focal, and spermatozoa can be found and used for ICSI in approximately 30%–60% of the cases.75 The main goals of sperm retrieval are (1) the acquisition of an adequate number of sperm for both immediate use and cryopreservation; (2) the retrieval of the highest quality of sperm; and (3) the minimization of damage to the testis, to preserve testicular function (i.e., testosterone production). Predictive factors for successful TESE were previously defined; nevertheless, only contradictory data have been published until now.76777879 Precisely, the preoperative factors considered are (a) serum FSH; (b) testicular volume: a recent meta-analysis showed that a testis volume higher than 12.5 ml predicted sperm retrieval rate (SRR) >60% with an accuracy of 86.2%;80 (c) serum inhibin B; (d) genetics: Y chromosome microdeletions may help predict the success of micro-TESE, i.e., men with AZFc microdeletions have high probabilities of a successful micro-TESE, whereas men with AZFa or AZFb should refrain from undergoing TESE;8182 men affected from KS show successful micro-TESE rates similar to men affected from NOA;8384 (e) age; (f) cryptorchidism; (g) histopathology: it has been reported that men with just Sertoli cell-only syndrome show a lower rate of spermatozoa recovery compared to men with predominantly hypospermatogenesis and maturation arrest. However, the requirement for a separate surgical procedure for the diagnosis is very limited. At present, no clinical or biochemical marker can surely predict the presence of active focal spermatogenesis within the testis. Finally, the use of testicular spermatozoa for ICSI has been proposed for patients with OAT and high DNA fragmentation or with cryptozoospermia. However, the couple should be informed that this approach is based on low-quality evidence.85


In 1986, Baker et al.86 adopted an evidence-based approach to identify a group of men with an untreatable condition of sterility for the first time, accounting for 12% of the cases of male infertility. The advent of IVF/ICSI opened to new investigations of male infertility. However, even if several etiologies of male infertility are known, its treatment approach in ART remained almost unchanged.87

Differently from female infertility,8889 only a limited number of men affected by a primary male factor infertility may be treated.9 Although this technology has significantly evolved over time, conventional IVF failed to solve problems associated with SMF infertility, as it is correlated to poor fertilization and pregnancy rates.90 Azoospermia associated with primary testicular failure was considered untreatable before 1985. These azoospermic patients (15%–20% of the infertile male population) were diagnosed as sterile, and sperm donation was their only possible strategy for conception.91 The only treatable exceptions were the pretesticular forms due to a dysregulation of hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal axis, which could be treated with FSH together with hCG, or the posttesticular obstructive cases that could have undergone reconstructive surgery. The introduction of MESA91 led to breakthrough discoveries with important clinical implications in patients affected by CBAVD, failed vasovasostomy or vasoepididymostomy, and any other irreparable obstructions unsolvable with surgery.92 The main advance in IVF, especially regarding the treatment of male infertility, is dated back to 1992: the ICSI.93 Its advent revolutionized IVF and was quickly adopted worldwide. The fertilization and pregnancy rates drastically improved, especially for patients undergoing MESA94 or TESE because of OA and NOA.95969798 Notably, some authors demonstrated better ICSI outcomes (in terms of embryo developmental potential) when using spermatozoa from OA patients compared to NOA patients,99100 possibly because part of the sperm maturation occurs in the epididymis. Furthermore, ICSI is also required in case of preimplantation diagnosis, in vitro maturation, and cryopreserved oocytes usage.101102103104105 However, in cases of specific rare disorders associated with male reproductive failure (globozoospermia and absolute sperm immobility) secondary to ultrastructural deficiencies within the sperm, ICSI is often not resolutive.106 Over the past two decades, the use of ICSI in patients with borderline or even normal semen characteristics has increased without no clear evidence of its benefits compared to conventional IVF. In fact, the Practice Committees of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology concluded that there is insufficient evidence to support the routine use of ICSI in patients without male factor infertility. Therefore, the choice to use either IVF or ICSI is yet unclear and will depend on future prospective studies comparing the outcomes of the two techniques.107108109110

Hereafter, the indications to various ART treatments are defined according to the clinical characteristics of the male partner. Intrauterine insemination (IUI) might be considered when:111112 (1) inseminating motile count (IMC) after washing is 0.8–5 million; (2) sperm morphology is 5% (normal); (3) total motile sperm count in the native sperm sample is 5–10 million; (4) total motility in the native sperm sample is 30%. IVF might be considered when:113114 (1) the minimum motile count in the native semen sample is at least 0.2–1 million spermatozoa; (2) sperm morphology is 5% (normal). The following are instead unequivocal indications to ICSI: (1) surgically retrieved testicular and epididymal sperm; (2) immotile spermatozoa; (3) round-headed spermatozoa (globozoospermia).114

Finally, physiological intracytoplasmic sperm injection (PICSI) and intracytoplasmic morphologically-selected sperm injection (IMSI) should be considered alternatives to ICSI;115 however, the indication to these techniques is still a matter of debate, and a recent meta-analysis does not support their clinical utility.116

Impact of SMF on ICSI outcome

To date, only a few data have been published regarding the impact of the severity of male factor infertility on ICSI outcomes, and no specific guidelines are available. European Academy of Andrology guideline85 suggested assisted reproduction as a symptomatic therapy after excluding other therapeutical options.

Data collected and analyzed include male age, blastocyst development, euploidy rate, and reproductive competence of the tested embryos. The influence of advanced paternal age on sperm quality and the reproductive outcome has been addressed in several studies.117118 Male age has been correlated with fertilization rate and embryo cleavage at 48 h and 72 h, respectively; nevertheless, the first results showed neither significant association119 nor adverse effects on ICSI outcomes.120121 Despite the fact that advanced paternal age could induce deleterious effects on semen quality, it does not seem to compromise reproductive outcomes when the female partner is not of advanced age.119 Still, the impact of extremely advanced paternal age on reproductive outcome needs to be clarified. Bartolacci and colleagues suggested that advanced male age negatively impacts fertilization and blastulation rates while neither interfering with developing good-quality blastocyst, nor establishing pregnancy after ICSI.122 Cioppi and colleagues used the term “paternal age effect (PAE)” to define the greater risk of congenital disorders, such as monogenic diseases, in children conceived by fathers of advanced age.123 Various authors124125 claimed that SMF might result in a higher prevalence of aneuploid embryos after IVF. However, their conclusions are mainly based on older FISH analyses of a limited number of chromosomes in a limited number of cleavage-stage embryos. In this regard, our group published an observational study based on 1219 cycles performed in 1090 couples which were clustered according to male factor in normozoospermic, moderate male factor, OAT, OA, and NOA. Interestingly, it was observed that the poorer the semen characteristics, the higher the risk of fertilization failure and developmental arrest before the blastocyst stage. However, the euploidy rate and the reproductive competence of the euploid blastocysts were independent of the male factor126 (Figure 1). Importantly, these results were reproduced through the quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)-based analysis of trophectoderm biopsies127128 and mostly were euploid single blastocyst transfer. The outcomes were confirmed after being corrected for all the putative confounders, including maternal age that is namely the most important cause of increasing aneuploidy rates, mainly due to meiotic impairments beyond the age of 35 years.129130131132133134 Perinatal and obstetrical outcomes were also similar across the different couples clustered according to the male factor. In a recent study, Coates and colleagues investigated the euploidy outcomes in embryos obtained from SMF patients versus normozoospermic patients. They reported an increase of sex chromosome abnormalities.135 Therefore, more recently, we assessed the prevalence of sex chromosome aneuploidies among 7549 blastocysts biopsied during qPCR-based preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) cycles. However, in contrast to Coates and colleagues, the univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses conducted from our dataset showed that only maternal age and blastocyst morphology are correlated with the prevalence of vital sex chromosome aneuploidies in the embryos (47,XXY; 47,XXX; 45,X).136

Figure 1:
Impact of severe male factor on ICSI outcome. MMF: moderate male factor; SMF: severe male factor; ICSI: intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

SMF and low ovarian reserve and response

Commonly, couples having an azoospermic man tend to be characterized by younger female partners with an associated good ovarian reserve. Moreover, as these women are being proposed IVF treatment earlier in their lives, their response to the controlled ovarian stimulation tends to be better than older women. Hence, this positive outcome in the female partners often compensates for the moderate or reduced male fertility. In general, IVF aims to overcome the natural biological barriers to successful fertilization to obtain a healthy live birth. In addition to SMF, a low ovarian reserve and response worsen the probability of achieving such an outcome. Mahesan and colleagues evaluated the influence of maternal age on the clinical outcomes after ICSI using surgically recovered sperm.137 Their report concludes that older women had significantly fewer oocytes retrieved and a lower probability of having a blastocyst transferred. An increased quantity of oocyte retrievals is required to collect enough MII oocytes to produce at least one chromosomally normal blastocyst. In general, fully exploiting the ovarian reserve to maximize the number of MII oocytes collected is pivotal, especially considering poor responder patients. Recently, the increasing knowledge of human ovarian follicular waves138139140141142 opened new horizons regarding controlled ovarian stimulation, intending to improve the efficiency and efficacy of IVF.143 This enhancement is achievable by collecting a higher number of MII oocytes in the shortest time frame possible. The classic theory stating that a single cohort of antral follicles grows only during the follicular phase of a menstrual cycle has been overtaken by the evidence that follicles may be recruited at any time throughout the ovarian cycle.144 Therefore, a novel ovarian stimulation protocol has been hypothesized, validated, and implemented: double ovarian stimulation in the follicular and luteal phases of a single ovarian cycle (DuoStim). Such innovative protocol has been recently demonstrated by our group as an effective strategy to increase the chance of finding at least one euploid blastocyst per ovarian cycle, in poor prognosis patients characterized by a limited reproductive time window.145 We also highlighted that luteal phase stimulation (LPS)-derived cohorts oocytes are larger (1 more oocyte on average collected) and equally competent as follicular phase stimulation (FPS)-derived ones.146 In the future, this ovarian stimulation strategy could also improve the conditions of couples suffering from SMF infertility (severe OAT, cryptozoospermia, and azoospermia), maximizing the number of oocytes retrieved per ovarian cycle to be then used for ICSI, thereby increasing their reduced probabilities of obtaining euploid blastocyst(s).


The use of ICSI with ejaculated or epididymal and testicular spermatozoa is of fundamental importance in treating male factor infertility. The drawback of this success is that nowadays, only limited research is ongoing to find other solutions to treat severe male infertility.147 Yet, in the future, new evidence may arise thanks to the broader use of ICSI with testicular spermatozoa, as well as from the implementation of novel stimulation protocols aimed at increasing the ovarian response (and the chance to identify at least one competent blastocyst) in a single ovarian cycle, thereby, counterbalancing the negative impact of SMF on the fertility outcome. Furthermore, some innovative approaches have been proposed, and these include the differentiation of embryonic stem cells into either male or female gametes,148 the in-vitro culture of spermatogonial stem cell,149 the clonal expansion of spermatogonia,150 and the creation of artificial gametes.151 Certainly, several studies are required before any of these avant-gardes may be clinically applied, and the development of whole-genome-scaled techniques might generate a better identification of disease-related abnormalities in known or novel genes.

At last, studying epigenetics could very well increase knowledge in this field. In fact, azoospermia is a complex disorder, and its etiology results from genetic and epigenetic changes. Specifically, recent studies highlighted an association between genomic DNA methylation in testicular cells and azoospermia,152 as well as the dynamic changes in chromatin organization/re-packaging and transcriptomes during human spermatogenesis.153 New findings will increase our knowledge regarding the diagnosis, counseling, and management of infertile patients, ultimately changing the current therapeutic strategies.


At present, male infertility is a key issue; hence, individualized research and diagnosis of the underlying causes of infertility are necessary. When applicable, IVF is considered feasible in overcoming SMF in order to reach a previously improbable live birth. ICSI was a breakthrough in IVF, allowing the treatment of OA and NOA patients, and improving the outcomes of OAT patients. Thus far, no solid and useful predictive factors for successful testicular sperm retrieval in azoospermic patients have been outlined. Moreover, SMF impairs early embryonic competence in terms of fertilization rate and developmental potential to the blastocyst stage. Nevertheless, once the blastocyst is obtained, its euploidy rate (including the prevalence of sex chromosome aneuploidies) and implantation potential are independent of the sperm quality.

In conclusion, the assessment of the male factor should involve (Figure 2):

Figure 2:
Workflow for the assessment of severe male factor in in vitro fertilization.
  1. Evaluation: to diagnose and quantify the seminologic alteration
  2. Potentiality: to determine if there are real possibilities to treat and improve sperm parameters and/or to recover spermatozoa
  3. Time available: to consider the “treatment window” of the male partner (the production of a mature spermatozoon from a testicular stem cell takes around 74 days, and the timing of the treatment can vary, depending on the etiology) relative to the characteristics of the female partner in terms of maternal age and ovarian reserve
  4. Research efforts to improve our current limited understanding of male reproductive biology.


RM and FMU conceived the review. RM, AV, DC, and LD drafted the manuscript, NU, SF, LR, FL, AL, and HT contributed to the final version of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.


All authors declare no competing interests.


1. Bhasin S, de Kretser DM, Baker HW. Clinical review 64: pathophysiology and natural history of male infertility J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1994;79:1525–9
2. Agarwal A, Mulgund A, Hamada A, Chyatte MR. A unique view on male infertility around the globe Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2015;13:37
3. World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen. 20105th ed Geneva World Health Organization
4. Sharlip ID, Jarow JP, Belker AM, Lipshultz LI, Sigman M, et al Best practice policies for male infertility Fertil Steril. 2002;77:873–82
5. Anderson JE, Farr SL, Jamieson DJ, Warner L, Macaluso M. Infertility services reported by men in the United States: national survey data Fertil Steril. 2009;91:2466–70
6. Maheshwari A, McLernon D, Bhattacharya S. Cumulative live birth rate: time for a consensus? Hum Reprod. 2015;30:2703–7
7. Punab M, Poolamets O, Paju P, Vihljajev V, Pomm K, et al Causes of male infertility: a 9-year prospective monocentre study on 1737 patients with reduced total sperm counts Hum Reprod. 2017;32:18–31
8. Jarow JP, Espeland MA, Lipshultz LI. Evaluation of the azoospermic patient J Urol. 1989;142:62–5
9. Tournaye H, Krausz C, Oates RD. Concepts in diagnosis and therapy for male reproductive impairment Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5:554–64
10. Boehm U, Bouloux PM, Dattani MT, de Roux N, Dode C, et al Expert consensus document: European Consensus Statement on congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism--pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2015;11:547–64
11. McLachlan RI, O’Donnell L, Meachem SJ, Stanton PG, De Kretser DM, et al Hormonal regulation of spermatogenesis in primates and man: insights for development of the male hormonal contraceptive J Androl. 2002;23:149–62
12. Liu PY, Handelsman DJ. The present and future state of hormonal treatment for male infertility Hum Reprod Update. 2003;9:9–23
13. Mak V, Jarvi KA. The genetics of male infertility J Urol. 1996;156:1245–56
14. Tournaye H, Staessen C, Liebaers I, Van Assche E, Devroey P, et al Testicular sperm recovery in nine 47,XXY Klinefelter patients Hum Reprod. 1996;11:1644–9
15. Paduch DA, Bolyakov A, Cohen P, Travis A. Reproduction in men with Klinefelter syndrome: the past, the present, and the future Semin Reprod Med. 2009;27:137–48
16. Schiff JD, Palermo GD, Veeck LL, Goldstein M, Rosenwaks Z, et al Success of testicular sperm injection and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in men with Klinefelter syndrome J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90:6263–7
17. Hamada AJ, Esteves SC, Agarwal A. A comprehensive review of genetics and genetic testing in azoospermia Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2013;68(Suppl 1):39–60
18. Krausz C, Cioppi F, Riera-Escamilla A. Testing for genetic contributions to infertility: potential clinical impact Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2018;18:331–46
19. Corona G, Pizzocaro A, Lanfranco F, Garolla A, Pelliccione F, et al Sperm recovery and ICSI outcomes in Klinefelter syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23:265–75
20. Vogt PH, Edelmann A, Kirsch S, Henegariu O, Hirschmann P, et al Human Y chromosome azoospermia factors (AZF) mapped to different subregions in Yq11 Hum Mol Genet. 1996;5:933–43
21. Grasso M, Buonaguidi A, Lania C, Bergamaschi F, Castelli M, et al Postpubertal cryptorchidism: review and evaluation of the fertility Eur Urol. 1991;20:126–8
22. Heindel RM, Pakyz RE, Reinking LN, Cosentino MJ. The effect of various degrees of unilateral spermatic cord torsion on fertility in the rat J Urol. 1990;144:366–9
23. Davis NF, McGuire BB, Mahon JA, Smyth AE, O’Malley KJ, et al The increasing incidence of mumps orchitis: a comprehensive review BJU Int. 2010;105:1060–5
24. Elia J, Imbrogno N, Delfino M, Mazzilli R, Spinosa V, et al Impact of long-term and short-term therapies on seminal parameters Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2013;85:20–3
25. Nudell DM, Monoski MM, Lipshultz LI. Common medications and drugs: how they affect male fertility Urol Clin North Am. 2002;29:965–73
26. Gentile M, Guido M, Lucia E, Vigna E, Mazzone C, et al Favorable conception and pregnancy involving a male patient affected by chronic myeloid leukemia while taking dasatinib Leuk Lymphoma. 2014;55:709–10
27. Pozza C, Pofi R, Tenuta M, Tarsitano MG, Sbardella E, et al Clinical presentation, management and follow-up of 83 patients with Leydig cell tumors of the testis: a prospective case-cohort study Hum Reprod. 2019;34:1389–403
28. Clavijo RI, Carrasquillo R, Ramasamy R. Varicoceles: prevalence and pathogenesis in adult men Fertil Steril. 2017;108:364–9
29. Tournaye HJ, Cohlen BJ. Management of male-factor infertility Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;26:769–75
30. Calogero AE, Duca Y, Condorelli RA, La Vignera S. Male accessory gland inflammation, infertility, and sexual dysfunctions: a practical approach to diagnosis and therapy Andrology. 2017;5:1064–72
31. Fijak M, Pilatz A, Hedger MP, Nicolas N, Bhushan S, et al Infectious, inflammatory and ‘autoimmune’ male factor infertility: how do rodent models inform clinical practice? Hum Reprod Update. 2018;24:416–41
32. Paoli D, Pallotti F, Colangelo S, Basilico F, Mazzuti L, et al Study of SARS-CoV-2 in semen and urine samples of a volunteer with positive naso-pharyngeal swab J Endocrinol Invest. 2020;43:1819–22
33. Corona G, Baldi E, Isidori AM, Paoli D, Pallotti F, et al SARS-CoV-2 infection, male fertility and sperm cryopreservation: a position statement of the Italian Society of Andrology and Sexual Medicine (SIAMS) (Societa Italiana di Andrologia e Medicina della Sessualita) J Endocrinol Invest. 2020;43:1153–7
34. Nieschlag E, Lenzi A. The conventional management of male infertility Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013;123(Suppl 2):S31–5
35. Barati E, Nikzad H, Karimian M. Oxidative stress and male infertility: current knowledge of pathophysiology and role of antioxidant therapy in disease management Cell Mol Life Sci. 2019;77:93–113
36. Alahmar AT. Role of Oxidative stress in male infertility: an updated review J Hum Reprod Sci. 2019;12:4–18
37. Agarwal A, Rana M, Qiu E, AlBunni H, Bui AD, et al Role of oxidative stress, infection and inflammation in male infertility Andrologia. 2018;50:e13126
38. Barati E, Nikzad H, Karimian M. Oxidative stress and male infertility: current knowledge of pathophysiology and role of antioxidant therapy in disease management Cell Mol Life Sci. 2020;77:93–113
39. Darbandi M, Darbandi S, Agarwal A, Sengupta P, Durairajanayagam D, et al Reactive oxygen species and male reproductive hormones Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2018;16:87
40. Mickle J, Milunsky A, Amos JA, Oates RD. Congenital unilateral absence of the vas deferens: a heterogeneous disorder with two distinct subpopulations based upon aetiology and mutational status of the cystic fibrosis gene Hum Reprod. 1995;10:1728–35
41. Elia J, Mazzilli R, Delfino M, Piane M, Bozzao C, et al Impact of Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Regulator (CFTR) gene mutations on male infertility Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2014;86:171–4
42. Terlizzi V, Lucarelli M, Salvatore D, Angioni A, Bisogno A, et al Clinical expression of cystic fibrosis in a large cohort of Italian siblings BMC Pulm Med. 2018;18:196
43. Yu J, Chen Z, Ni Y, Li Z. CFTR mutations in men with congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens (CBAVD): a systemic review and meta-analysis Hum Reprod. 2012;27:25–35
44. Ferlin A, Raicu F, Gatta V, Zuccarello D, Palka G, et al Male infertility: role of genetic background Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;14:734–45
45. Matsuda T, Horii Y, Yoshida O. Unilateral obstruction of the vas deferens caused by childhood inguinal herniorrhaphy in male infertility patients Fertil Steril. 1992;58:609–13
46. Shefi S, Turek PJ. Definition and current evaluation of subfertile men Int Braz J Urol. 2006;32:385–97
47. Cocuzza M, Alvarenga C, Pagani R. The epidemiology and etiology of azoospermia Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2013;68(Suppl 1):15–26
48. Kim HH, Schlegel PN. Endocrine manipulation in male infertility Urol Clin North Am. 2008;35:303–18 x
49. Sigman M, Jarow JP. Endocrine evaluation of infertile men Urology. 1997;50:659–64
50. Barratt CL, Bjorndahl L, De Jonge CJ, Lamb DJ, Osorio Martini F, et al The diagnosis of male infertility: an analysis of the evidence to support the development of global WHO guidance-challenges and future research opportunities Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23:660–80
51. Schlegel PN, Sigman M, Collura B, De Jonge CJ, Eisenberg ML, et al Diagnosis and treatment of infertility in men: AUA/ASRM guideline part I J Urol. 2021;205:36–43
52. Foresta C, Garolla A, Frigo AC, Carraro U, Isidori AM, et al Anthropometric, penile and testis measures in post-pubertal Italian males J Endocrinol Invest. 2013;36:287–92
53. Lotti F, Corona G, Degli Innocenti S, Filimberti E, Scognamiglio V, et al Seminal, ultrasound and psychobiological parameters correlate with metabolic syndrome in male members of infertile couples Andrology. 2013;1:229–39
54. Lotti F, Maggi M. Ultrasound of the male genital tract in relation to male reproductive health Hum Reprod Update. 2015;21:56–83
55. Agarwal A, Majzoub A, Esteves SC, Ko E, Ramasamy R, et al Clinical utility of sperm DNA fragmentation testing: practice recommendations based on clinical scenarios Transl Androl Urol. 2016;5:935–50
56. Rienzi L, Mazzilli R, Ubaldi FM. Sperm DNA fragmentation to predict embryo development, implantation, and miscarriage: still an open question Fertil Steril. 2019;112:466
57. Ferlin A, Garolla A, Ghezzi M, Selice R, Palego P, et al Sperm count and hypogonadism as markers of general male health Eur Urol Focus. 2019;7:205–13
58. Adan L, Couto-Silva AC, Trivin C, Metz C, Brauner R. Congenital gonadotropin deficiency in boys: management during childhood J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2004;17:149–55
59. Casarini L, Crepieux P, Reiter E, Lazzaretti C, Paradiso E, et al FSH for the treatment of male infertility Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:2270
60. Barbonetti A, Calogero AE, Balercia G, Garolla A, Krausz C, et al The use of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) for the treatment of the infertile man: position statement from the Italian Society of Andrology and Sexual Medicine (SIAMS) J Endocrinol Invest. 2018;41:1107–22
61. Corona G, Goulis DG, Huhtaniemi I, Zitzmann M, Toppari J, et al European Academy of Andrology (EAA) guidelines on investigation, treatment and monitoring of functional hypogonadism in males: Endorsing organization: European Society of Endocrinology Andrology. 2020;8:970–87
62. Schlegel PN, Sigman M, Collura B, De Jonge CJ, Eisenberg ML, et al Diagnosis and treatment of infertility in men: AUA/ASRM guideline part II J Urol. 2021;205:44–51
63. Cannarella R, Condorelli RA, Mongioi LM, Barbagallo F, Calogero AE, et al Effects of the selective estrogen receptor modulators for the treatment of male infertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2019;20:1517–25
64. Omar MI, Pal RP, Kelly BD, Bruins HM, Yuan Y, et al Benefits of empiric nutritional and medical therapy for semen parameters and pregnancy and live birth rates in couples with idiopathic infertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis Eur Urol. 2019;75:615–25
65. Calogero AE, Aversa A, La Vignera S, Corona G, Ferlin A. The use of nutraceuticals in male sexual and reproductive disturbances: position statement from the Italian Society of Andrology and Sexual Medicine (SIAMS) J Endocrinol Invest. 2017;40:1389–97
66. Esteves SC, Santi D, Simoni M. An update on clinical and surgical interventions to reduce sperm DNA fragmentation in infertile men Andrology. 2020;8:53–81
67. Mirone V, Arcaniolo D, Rivas D, Bull S, Aquilina JW, et al Results from a prospective observational study of men with premature ejaculation treated with dapoxetine or alternative care: the PAUSE study Eur Urol. 2014;65:733–9
68. Sansone A, Fegatelli DA, Pozza C, Fattorini G, Lauretta R, et al Effects of percutaneous varicocele repair on testicular volume: results from a 12-month follow-up Asian J Androl. 2019;21:408–12
69. Mongioi LM, Mammino L, Compagnone M, Condorelli RA, Basile A, et al Effects of varicocele treatment on sperm conventional parameters: surgical varicocelectomy versus sclerotherapy Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2019;42:396–404
70. Lundy SD, Sabanegh ES Jr. Varicocele management for infertility and pain: a systematic review Arab J Urol. 2018;16:157–70
71. Al-Mohammady AA, El-Sherbiny AF, Mehaney AB, Ghobara YA. Varicocele repair in patients prepared for intracytoplasmic sperm injection: to do or not to do? Andrologia. 2019;51:e13185
72. Kroese AC, de Lange NM, Collins JA, Evers JL. Varicocele surgery, new evidence Hum Reprod Update. 2013;19:317
73. Schlegel PN, Sigman M, Collura B, De Jonge CJ, Eisenberg ML, et al Diagnosis and treatment of infertility in men: AUA/ASRM guideline part II Fertil Steril. 2021;115:62–9
74. Esteves SC, Miyaoka R, Orosz JE, Agarwal A. An update on sperm retrieval techniques for azoospermic males Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2013;68(Suppl 1):99–110
75. Osmanagaoglu K, Vernaeve V, Kolibianakis E, Tournaye H, Camus M, et al Cumulative delivery rates after ICSI treatment cycles with freshly retrieved testicular sperm: a 7-year follow-up study Hum Reprod. 2003;18:1836–40
76. Bernie AM, Ramasamy R, Schlegel PN. Predictive factors of successful microdissection testicular sperm extraction Basic Clin Androl. 2013;23:5
77. Donoso P, Tournaye H, Devroey P. Which is the best sperm retrieval technique for non-obstructive azoospermia? A systematic review Hum Reprod Update. 2007;13:539–49
78. Okada H, Shirakawa T, Ishikawa T, Goda K, Fujisawa M, et al Serum testosterone levels in patients with nonmosaic Klinefelter syndrome after testicular sperm extraction for intracytoplasmic sperm injection Fertil Steril. 2004;82:237–8
79. Tesarik J, Ubaldi F, Rienzi L, Martinez F, Iacobelli M, et al Caspase-dependent and -independent DNA fragmentation in Sertoli and germ cells from men with primary testicular failure: relationship with histological diagnosis Hum Reprod. 2004;19:254–61
80. Corona G, Minhas S, Giwercman A, Bettocchi C, Dinkelman-Smit M, et al Sperm recovery and ICSI outcomes in men with non-obstructive azoospermia: a systematic review and meta-analysis Hum Reprod Update. 2019;25:733–57
81. Vogt PH. Human Y chromosome deletions in Yq11 and male fertility Adv Exp Med Biol. 1997;424:17–30
82. Reijo R, Lee TY, Salo P, Alagappan R, Brown LG, et al Diverse spermatogenic defects in humans caused by Y chromosome deletions encompassing a novel RNA-binding protein gene Nat Genet. 1995;10:383–93
83. Friedler S, Raziel A, Strassburger D, Schachter M, Bern O, et al Outcome of ICSI using fresh and cryopreserved-thawed testicular spermatozoa in patients with non-mosaic Klinefelter's syndrome Hum Reprod. 2001;16:2616–20
84. Ramasamy R, Ricci JA, Palermo GD, Gosden LV, Rosenwaks Z, et al Successful fertility treatment for Klinefelter's syndrome J Urol. 2009;182:1108–13
85. Colpi GM, Francavilla S, Haidl G, Link K, Behre HM, et al European Academy of Andrology guideline Management of oligo-astheno-teratozoospermia Andrology. 2018;6:513–24
86. Baker H, Burger H, de Kretser D, Hudson BSanten RJ, Swerloff RS. Relative incidence of etiologic disorders in male infertility Male Reproductive Dysfunction: Diagnosis and Management of Hypogonadism, Infertility and Impotence. 1986 New York Marcel Dekker:341–72
87. Niederberger C. Re: forty years of IVF J Urol. 2019;201:213
88. Venturella R, Vaiarelli A, Cimadomo D, Pedri S, Lico D, et al State of the art and emerging drug therapies for female infertility Gynecol Endocrinol. 2019;35:835–41
89. Romualdi D, De Cicco S, Gagliano D, Busacca M, Campagna G, et al How metformin acts in PCOS pregnant women: insights into insulin secretion and peripheral action at each trimester of gestation Diabetes Care. 2013;36:1477–82
90. van Rumste MM, Evers JL, Farquhar CM, Blake DA. Intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection versus partial zona dissection, subzonal insemination and conventional techniques for oocyte insemination during in vitro fertilisation Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000 CD001301
91. Stanwell-Smith RE, Hendry WF. The prognosis of male subfertility: a survey of 1025 men referred to a fertility clinic Br J Urol. 1984;56:422–8
92. Temple-Smith PD, Southwick GJ, Yates CA, Trounson AO, de Kretser DM. Human pregnancy by in vitro fertilization (IVF) using sperm aspirated from the epididymis J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf. 1985;2:119–22
93. Van Steirteghem AC, Liu J, Joris H, Nagy Z, Janssenswillen C, et al Higher success rate by intracytoplasmic sperm injection than by subzonal insemination. Report of a second series of 300 consecutive treatment cycles Hum Reprod. 1993;8:1055–60
94. Tournaye H, Devroey P, Liu J, Nagy Z, Lissens W, et al Microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration and intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a new effective approach to infertility as a result of congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens Fertil Steril. 1994;61:1045–51
95. Devroey P, Liu J, Nagy Z, Tournaye H, Silber SJ, et al Normal fertilization of human oocytes after testicular sperm extraction and intracytoplasmic sperm injection Fertil Steril. 1994;62:639–41
96. Devroey P, Liu J, Nagy Z, Goossens A, Tournaye H, et al Pregnancies after testicular sperm extraction and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in non-obstructive azoospermia Hum Reprod. 1995;10:1457–60
97. Tsirigotis M, Craft I. Sperm retrieval methods and ICSI for obstructive azoospermia Hum Reprod. 1995;10:758–60
98. Holden CA, Fuscaldo GF, Jackson P, Cato A, Southwick GJ, et al Frozen-thawed epididymal spermatozoa for intracytoplasmic sperm injection Fertil Steril. 1997;67:81–7
99. Mansour RT, Kamal A, Fahmy I, Tawab N, Serour GI, et al Intracytoplasmic sperm injection in obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermia Hum Reprod. 1997;12:1974–9
100. Ghazzawi IM, Sarraf MG, Taher MR, Khalifa FA. Comparison of the fertilizing capability of spermatozoa from ejaculates, epididymal aspirates and testicular biopsies using intracytoplasmic sperm injection Hum Reprod. 1998;13:348–52
101. Sermon K, Capalbo A, Cohen J, Coonen E, De Rycke M, et al The why, the how and the when of PGS 2.0: current practices and expert opinions of fertility specialists, molecular biologists, and embryologists Mol Hum Reprod. 2016;22:845–57
102. Ubaldi F, Rienzi L, Baroni E, Ferrero S, Iacobelli M, et al Cumulative pregnancy rates after transfer of fresh and thawed embryos Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004;115(Suppl 1):S106–9
103. Capalbo A, Bono S, Spizzichino L, Biricik A, Baldi M, et al Sequential comprehensive chromosome analysis on polar bodies, blastomeres and trophoblast: insights into female meiotic errors and chromosomal segregation in the preimplantation window of embryo development Hum Reprod. 2013;28:509–18
104. Capalbo A, Romanelli V, Cimadomo D, Girardi L, Stoppa M, et al Implementing PGD/PGD-A in IVF clinics: considerations for the best laboratory approach and management J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016;33:1279–86
105. Capalbo A, Ubaldi FM, Cimadomo D, Maggiulli R, Patassini C, et al Consistent and reproducible outcomes of blastocyst biopsy and aneuploidy screening across different biopsy practitioners: a multicentre study involving 2586 embryo biopsies Hum Reprod. 2016;31:199–208
106. Tournaye H, Krausz C, Oates RD. Novel concepts in the aetiology of male reproductive impairment Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5:544–53
107. Kim HH, Bundorf MK, Behr B, McCallum SW. Use and outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection for non-male factor infertility Fertil Steril. 2007;88:622–8
108. Luna M, Bigelow C, Duke M, Ruman J, Sandler B, et al Should ICSI be recommended routinely in patients with four or fewer oocytes retrieved? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28:911–5
109. Bhattacharya S, Hamilton MP, Shaaban M, Khalaf Y, Seddler M, et al Conventional in-vitro fertilisation versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection for the treatment of non-male-factor infertility: a randomised controlled trial Lancet. 2001;357:2075–9
110. Boulet SL, Mehta A, Kissin DM, Warner L, Kawwass JF, et al Trends in use of and reproductive outcomes associated with intracytoplasmic sperm injection JAMA. 2015;313:255–63
111. Ombelet W, Deblaere K, Bosmans E, Cox A, Jacobs P, et al Semen quality and intrauterine insemination Reprod Biomed Online. 2003;7:485–92
112. Ombelet W, Vandeput H, Janssen M, Cox A, Vossen C, et al Treatment of male infertility due to sperm surface antibodies: IUI or IVF? Hum Reprod. 1997;12:1165–70
113. Kastrop PM. Quality management in the ART laboratory Reprod Biomed Online. 2003;7:691–4
114. Esteves SC, Roque M, Bedoschi G, Haahr T, Humaidan P. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection for male infertility and consequences for offspring Nat Rev Urol. 2018;15:535–62
115. Bartoov B, Berkovitz A, Eltes F. Selection of spermatozoa with normal nuclei to improve the pregnancy rate with intracytoplasmic sperm injection N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1067–8
116. Teixeira DM, Barbosa MA, Ferriani RA, Navarro PA, Raine-Fenning N, et al Regular (ICSI) versus ultra-high magnification (IMSI) sperm selection for assisted reproduction Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2:CD010167
117. Paoli D, Pecora G, Pallotti F, Faja F, Pelloni M, et al Cytological and molecular aspects of the ageing sperm Hum Reprod. 2019;34:218–27
118. Defeudis G, Mazzilli R, Gianfrilli D, Lenzi A, Isidori AM. The CATCH checklist to investigate adult-onset hypogonadism Andrology. 2018;6:665–79
119. Bellver J, Garrido N, Remohi J, Pellicer A, Meseguer M. Influence of paternal age on assisted reproduction outcome Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;17:595–604
120. Spandorfer SD, Avrech OM, Colombero LT, Palermo GD, Rosenwaks Z. Effect of parental age on fertilization and pregnancy characteristics in couples treated by intracytoplasmic sperm injection Hum Reprod. 1998;13:334–8
121. Aboulghar M, Mansour R, Al-Inany H, Abou-Setta AM, Aboulghar M, et al Paternal age and outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;14:588–92
122. Bartolacci A, Pagliardini L, Makieva S, Salonia A, Papaleo E, et al Abnormal sperm concentration and motility as well as advanced paternal age compromise early embryonic development but not pregnancy outcomes: a retrospective study of 1266 ICSI cycles J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35:1897–903
123. Cioppi F, Casamonti E, Krausz C. Age-dependent de novo mutations during spermatogenesis and their consequences Adv Exp Med Biol. 2019;1166:29–46
124. Magli MC, Gianaroli L, Ferraretti AP, Gordts S, Fredericks V, et al Paternal contribution to aneuploidy in preimplantation embryos Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;18:536–42
125. Silber S, Escudero T, Lenahan K, Abdelhadi I, Kilani Z, et al Chromosomal abnormalities in embryos derived from testicular sperm extraction Fertil Steril. 2003;79:30–8
126. Mazzilli R, Cimadomo D, Vaiarelli A, Capalbo A, Dovere L, et al Effect of the male factor on the clinical outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection combined with preimplantation aneuploidy testing: observational longitudinal cohort study of 1219 consecutive cycles Fertil Steril. 2017;108:961–72.e3
127. Capalbo A, Rienzi L, Cimadomo D, Maggiulli R, Elliott T, et al Correlation between standard blastocyst morphology, euploidy and implantation: an observational study in two centers involving 956 screened blastocysts Hum Reprod. 2014;29:1173–81
128. Capalbo A, Treff NR, Cimadomo D, Tao X, Upham K, et al Comparison of array comparative genomic hybridization and quantitative real-time PCR-based aneuploidy screening of blastocyst biopsies Eur J Hum Genet. 2015;23:901–6
129. Ubaldi FM, Cimadomo D, Capalbo A, Vaiarelli A, Buffo L, et al Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy testing in women older than 44 years: a multicenter experience Fertil Steril. 2017;107:1173–80
130. La Marca A, Ferraretti AP, Palermo R, Ubaldi FM. The use of ovarian reserve markers in IVF clinical practice: a national consensus Gynecol Endocrinol. 2016;32:1–5
131. Ottolini CS, Newnham LJ, Capalbo A, Natesan SA, Joshi HA, et al Genome-wide maps of recombination and chromosome segregation in human oocytes and embryos show selection for maternal recombination rates Nat Genet. 2015;47:727–35
132. Capalbo A, Hoffmann ER, Cimadomo D, Maria Ubaldi F, Rienzi L. Human female meiosis revised: new insights into the mechanisms of chromosome segregation and aneuploidies from advanced genomics and time-lapse imaging Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23:706–22
133. Franasiak JM, Forman EJ, Hong KH, Werner MD, Upham KM, et al The nature of aneuploidy with increasing age of the female partner: a review of 15 169 consecutive trophectoderm biopsies evaluated with comprehensive chromosomal screening Fertil Steril. 2014;101:656–63.e1
134. Cimadomo D, Fabozzi G, Vaiarelli A, Ubaldi N, Ubaldi FM, et al Impact of maternal age on oocyte and embryo competence Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2018;9:327
135. Coates A, Hesla JS, Hurliman A, Coate B, Holmes E, et al Use of suboptimal sperm increases the risk of aneuploidy of the sex chromosomes in preimplantation blastocyst embryos Fertil Steril. 2015;104:866–72
136. Mazzilli R, Cimadomo D, Rienzi L, Capalbo A, Levi Setti PE, et al Prevalence of XXY karyotypes in human blastocysts: multicentre data from 7549 trophectoderm biopsies obtained during preimplantation genetic testing cycles in IVF Hum Reprod. 2018;33:1355–63
137. Mahesan AM, Sadek S, Moussavi V, Vazifedan T, Majeed A, et al Clinical outcomes following ICSI cycles using surgically recovered sperm and the impact of maternal age: 2004-2015 SART CORS registry J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35:1239–46
138. Poseidon Group, Alviggi C, Andersen CY, Buehler K, Conforti A, et al A new more detailed stratification of low responders to ovarian stimulation: from a poor ovarian response to a low prognosis concept Fertil Steril. 2016;105:1452–3
139. Ubaldi F, Vaiarelli A, D’Anna R, Rienzi L. Management of poor responders in IVF: is there anything new? Biomed Res Int 2014. 2014 352098
140. Ubaldi FM, Rienzi L, Ferrero S, Baroni E, Sapienza F, et al Management of poor responders in IVF Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;10:235–46
141. Nardo LG, Fleming R, Howles CM, Bosch E, Hamamah S, et al Conventional ovarian stimulation no longer exists: welcome to the age of individualized ovarian stimulation Reprod Biomed Online. 2011;23:141–8
142. Ubaldi F, Rienzi L, Baroni E, Ferrero S, Iacobelli M, et al Hopes and facts about mild ovarian stimulation Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;14:675–81
143. Massin N. New stimulation regimens: endogenous and exogenous progesterone use to block the LH surge during ovarian stimulation for IVF Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23:211–20
144. Baerwald AR, Adams GP, Pierson RA. Ovarian antral folliculogenesis during the human menstrual cycle: a review Hum Reprod Update. 2012;18:73–91
145. Ubaldi FM, Capalbo A, Vaiarelli A, Cimadomo D, Colamaria S, et al Follicular versus luteal phase ovarian stimulation during the same menstrual cycle (DuoStim) in a reduced ovarian reserve population results in a similar euploid blastocyst formation rate: new insight in ovarian reserve exploitation Fertil Steril. 2016;105:1488–95.e1
146. Vaiarelli A, Cimadomo D, Argento C, Ubaldi N, Trabucco E, et al Double stimulation in the same ovarian cycle (DuoStim) is an intriguing strategy to improve oocyte yield and the number of competent embryos in a short timeframe Minerva Ginecol. 2019;71:372–6
147. Barratt CLR, De Jonge CJ, Sharpe RM. ‘Man Up’: the importance and strategy for placing male reproductive health centre stage in the political and research agenda Hum Reprod. 2018;33:541–5
148. Ko K, Scholer HR. Embryonic stem cells as a potential source of gametes Semin Reprod Med. 2006;24:322–9
149. Kubota H, Brinster RL. Technology insight: in vitro culture of spermatogonial stem cells and their potential therapeutic uses Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab. 2006;2:99–108
150. Ehmcke J, Wistuba J, Schlatt S. Spermatogonial stem cells: questions, models and perspectives Hum Reprod Update. 2006;12:275–82
151. Nagy ZP, Chang CC. Artificial gametes Theriogenology. 2007;67:99–104
152. Wu X, Luo C, Hu L, Chen X, Chen Y, et al Unraveling epigenomic abnormality in azoospermic human males by WGBS, RNA-Seq, and transcriptome profiling analyses J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020;37:789–802
153. Wu X, Lu M, Yun D, Gao S, Chen S, et al Single cell ATAC-Seq reveals cell type-specific transcriptional regulation and unique chromatin accessibility in human spermatogenesis Hum Mol Genet. 2021 Doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddab006. [Epub ahead of print]

azoospermia; in vitro fertilization; infertility; intracytoplasmic sperm injection; severe male factor; sperm

© 2022 Asian Journal of Andrology | Published by Wolters Kluwer – Medknow