Secondary Logo

Journal Logo


Influence of dapivirine vaginal ring use on cervicovaginal immunity and functional microbiome in adolescent girls

Farr Zuend, Christinaa; Noël-Romas, Lauraa,b; Hoger, Sarahb; McCorriser, Stuartc; Westmacott, Garrettc; Marrazzo, Jeanned; Hillier, Sharon L.e,f; Dezzutti, Charlenee,f; Squires, Kathleeng; Bunge, Katherine E.e,f; Burgener, Adama,b,h

Author Information
doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000002751



One million women are infected with HIV annually [1]. Young women (15–24 years old) are disproportionally infected with HIV, with rates up to eight-fold higher [1] and infection acquired 5–7 years earlier [2] than aged-matched men. Young women represent a major target population for HIV prevention strategies, yet clinical trials rarely include adolescents.

Female-controlled HIV prevention technologies, which could include antiretrovirals formulated as oral tablets, or vaginal gels and rings, are critical for limiting the HIV epidemic. Adherence to daily or coitally dependent strategies has been low [3–5], indicating longer acting approaches are warranted. Vaginal rings provide sustained local release of drug, do not require daily adherence and can be removed any time. The safety and acceptability of rings for contraception and estrogen replacement therapies support the use of a vaginal ring for HIV prevention, and the technology provides the option for co-formulating multiple active ingredients for dual-purpose prevention of HIV and pregnancy [6]. Two phase III clinical trials investigating a vaginal ring containing the nonnucleoside HIV reverse transcriptase inhibitor dapivirine reported HIV risk was reduced by approximately 30% across both trials [7,8]. A post hoc analysis of one study showed a 56% reduction in HIV risk among women over 21 years of age, likely because of more consistent ring use [7,8]. Furthermore, open label extension studies have reported HIV incidence decreased by an estimated 39% (HOPE/MTN-025) [9] and 63% (DREAM-IPM 032) [10] with dapivirine.

Although the dapivirine ring has been shown to be well tolerated in adult women, studies in adolescents are lacking. As the vaginal microenvironment differs between adolescent and adult women, it is important to investigate safety and efficacy in adolescents. Biological changes associated with puberty and sexual debut can influence both the immune responses and the microbiome in the vaginal tract [11–18]. Some studies have reported high levels of Lactobacillus in adolescent girls, with compositional and structural similarity to adults, whereas others have reported decreased Lactobacillus, higher vaginal pH, and increased levels of bacterial vaginosis-associated bacteria in adolescents, particularly after sexual debut, all of which could impact the safety or efficacy of the dapivirine ring [15,18–26].

This is an exploratory analysis of MTN-023, a phase 2a trial assessing product safety and acceptability in adolescents [27]. A proteomics approach was used to evaluate the influence of the dapivirine ring on the mucosal proteome and microbiome in a substudy of 35 participants.


Study population

MTN-023 was a phase 2a study of dapivirine vaginal ring in adolescents. The study enrolled 96 healthy, HIV-uninfected adolescents aged 15–17 years. Participants were randomized 3 : 1 to a 25 mg dapivirine or placebo ring to be inserted once every 4 weeks for 24 weeks. Participants were sexually experienced, nonpregnant and using an effective method of hormonal contraception, including intrauterine devices, implantable hormonal contraceptives, or oral contraceptives. Screening for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) was performed at screening visits, and young women with STIs were excluded from enrolment. Participants agreed to use condoms and to refrain from inserting anything into the vagina for 72 h before each sampling visit. Participants provided written informed consent and obtained written parental/guardian permission for screening and enrolment. Thirty-five participants (36%) who reported continuous ring use were selected for proteomic analysis (n = 8 placebo, n = 27 dapivirine). This substudy was approved by institutional review boards at the University of Pittsburgh, the University of Alabama, and the University of Manitoba.

Sample collection

Cervicovaginal lavage (CVL) was performed at clinic visits by bathing the cervical os with 10 ml of sterile phosphate-buffered saline. CVL specimens were kept cool and processed within 8 h. CVL was spun at 800×g for 10 min, then supernatant was aliquoted and stored at 70 °C or less until use. Substudy samples were available from a baseline time point, prior to ring use, and two follow-up visits. All follow-up visits in the placebo arm were at 3 and 6 months postenrolment. In the dapivirine arm, 23 of 27 women (85%) had samples available at 3 and 6 months of follow-up. A total of three of 27 (11%) participants had samples at 1 and 3 months postenrolment, and one of 27 (4%) participants had samples at months 3 and 4 postenrolment used for follow-up visits 1 and 2.

Sample preparation for mass spectrometry

Sample preparation was performed as previously described [28–30]. Briefly, 50 μg of protein per sample was denatured for 10 min at room temperature with urea exchange buffer [8 mol/l urea (GE HealthCare, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada); 50 mmol/l HEPES pH 8.0 (Sigma, St. Louis, Misssouri, USA)], reduced with 25 mmol/l dithiothreitol (Sigma), alkylated with 50 mmol/l iodoacetamide (Sigma), and digested with trypsin (Promega, Madision, Wisconsin, USA). Peptides were eluted and dried via vacuum centrifugation. Reversed-phase liquid chromatography (high pH RP, Agilent 1200 series microflow pump, Water XBridge column) was used for desalting and detergent removal of peptides using a step-function gradient as described [31]. Peptides were quantified using the FluoroProfile quantification kit (Sigma) following the Lava Pep quantification protocol. Samples were randomized and aliquoted to a final peptide concentration of 0.5 μg/μl in 15 μl LC buffer (2% acetronitrile, 0.1% formic acid).

Mass spectrometry analysis

Samples were analyzed by label-free tandem mass spectrometry as described [31]. Equal amounts of peptides were injected into a nanoflow LC system (1200 Easy nLC, Thermo Fisher) connected inline to a Q Exactive Plus mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher). Data-dependent acquisition was used, and the 15 most abundant precursor ions in the survey scan were selected for high collision dissociation fragmentation.

Human proteome analysis

Protein levels were normalized to total ion current using Progenesis QI (v21.38.1432, Nonlinear Dynamics, Durham, North Carolina, USA). Mascot (Matrix Science, v2.6.0) was used to search peptide sequences against the UniProt SwissProt (2015) human database. A decoy database was included to determine the rate of false discovery. Protein identifications were confirmed using Scaffold (v4.4.1, Proteome Software) with confidence thresholds set at 95% protein identification confidence, requiring at least two unique peptides and 80% peptide identification confidence. Proteins underwent a log transformation (base 2) before analysis. Only proteins that had an average coefficient of variance less than 25% (405 proteins), determined through measurements of a standard reference sample run at 10 sample intervals (total 10 times) were used in downstream analysis. Proteins associated with either dapivirine or placebo ring use (adjusted P < 0.05) underwent pathway enrichment analysis using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (v.01–07, IPA software).

Microbial proteome analysis

Protein database searches were initially conducted against all bacterial proteins in the UniProt-TrEMBL database (August 2015), from both reviewed and unreviewed sources, using Mascot (v2.4.0, Matrix Science). Searches for bacterial peptides were then performed a second time using a manually curated database limited to the major genera (≥0.2% of the total protein) identified in the initial search including (from most to least abundant): Lactobacillus, Gardnerella, Ruegeria, Chlamydia, Prevotella, Nitrosospira, Mobiluncus, Escherichia, Azospirillum, Bifidobacterium, Desulfovibrio, Ruminococcus, Megasphaera, Atopobium, Clostridium, Pseudomonas, Hylemonella, Acidovorax, Sneathia, Bradyrhizobium, and Congregibacter as well as reviewed sequence data from Homo sapiens (UniProtKB/SwissProt, Sept 2015) to exclude potential homologies. Scaffold was used to validate protein identifications using the following criteria: 0.1% or less FDR for peptide identification, 1% or less FDR for protein identification, and at least two unique peptides identified per protein. Microbial abundance was calculated by taking the sum of normalized total spectral counts from Scaffold for all proteins associated with each genus. Lactobacillus was analyzed at the species level. Nonhomologous bacterial proteins were mapped against the KEGG ontology database using GhostKOALA (v.2.0, Kyoto University Bioinformatics Center).

Statistical analysis

Follow-up visits were separated based on follow-up visit 1 and follow-up visit 2. Longitudinal differences in the human proteome and in bacterial taxa levels were assessed using one-way repeated measures ANOVA with Tukey's correction for multiple comparisons on paired data (n = 3 comparisons between sample visits). Four participants were removed from the host proteome analysis (one placebo, three dapivirine) as they either did not have samples available at baseline and all follow-up visits or at least one sample was identified as an outlier (above or below 1.5 IQR). On the basis of conservative estimates of variance (CV = 100%, adjusted alpha = 0.0167) and CVL proteome coverage, the study was adequately powered (80%) to detect 1.8-fold and 0.73-fold changes in protein expression from baseline in the placebo and dapivirine arms over time, respectively. Proteins significantly associated with dapivirine or placebo ring use were analyzed using hierarchical clustering analysis of median centered protein abundances, using a Euclidean distance with Fisher's exact test or chi-square as appropriate (NMF package in R v.3.5.1 [32,33]).

Metaproteome taxonomic diversity was assessed using Shannon's H diversity index. Using a conservative estimate of 150% CV across all taxa, and a two-tailed alpha = 0.05, adjusted for n = 17 taxa comparisons, the study was adequately powered (80%) to detect changes of 2.9-fold and 1.1-fold between time points within women using placebo and dapivirine rings, respectively.

A total of 18 bacterial functions were identified that could be assessed at 80% power (CV = 144%, power = 0.80, fold difference = 1, 20% sample coverage). Bacterial functional composition profiles were calculated using three zero replacement methods to ensure robustness of findings: undetected pathways were assumed to be true zeros, a pseudocount = 0.0001 was applied, or a half minimum pathway-level replacement was applied; statistical results from the true-zero estimates are reported. Pathway differences were assessed using either proportional data (two-tailed, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests) over time or between women with above/below median levels of each pathway (two-tailed Fisher's exact test) between treatment arms.

For the condom use sub-analysis, Mann--Whitney U test and Kruskal--Wallis test with Dunn's correction for multiple comparisons were used to determine differences between groups whereas Spearman's r value was used for correlations.


Participant characteristics

At enrolment, 4 (50%) and 18 (66.7%) participants in the placebo and dapivirine arms of this substudy, respectively, reported having a primary sexual partner (P = 0.69). At follow-up visits, 50% of participants in the placebo arm and 53% in the dapivirine arm reported having a primary sexual partner (P > 0.99). Vaginal sex with a condom in the previous 30 days was reported by 37.5–55% of participants at study visits, whereas 25–31% of participants reported unprotected vaginal sex in the previous 30 days. There was no difference in reports of receptive oral sex. All participants in the placebo arm reported ring use at follow-up visits. One participant in the dapivirine arm reported no ring use in the past 30 days at one follow-up visit (Table 1). Ninety-five percent of returned vaginal rings had levels of less than 23.5 mg of dapivirine, which is indicative of adherence over the past month, and has been associated with protection from HIV [27].

Table 1 - Participant characteristics.
Placebo (n = 8) Dapivirine (n = 27)
Baseline (n = 8) Follow-up visitsa (n = 16) P value Baseline (n = 27) Follow-up visitsa (n = 54) P value
Primary partner (n; % yes) 4 (50%) 8 (50%) >0.9999 18 (66.7%) 28 (52.8%) 0.2403
Vaginal sex last 30 days (all) (n; % yes) 3 (37.5%) 8 (50%) 0.6792 15 (55.6%) 25 (47.2%) 0.4852
Vaginal sex with condom last 30 days (n; % yes) 3 (37.5%) 7 (43.8%) >0.9999 14 (51.8%) 24 (45.3%) 0.6381
Vaginal sex without condom last 30 days (n; % yes) 2 (25%) 5 (31.3%) >0.9999 8 (29.6%) 14 (26.4%) 0.7933
Oral sex last 30 days (receptive) (n; % yes) 3 (37.5%) 3 (18.8%) 0.3618 10 (37.0%) 21 (38.9%) >0.999
Anal sex last 30 days (n; % yes) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) N/A 1 (3.7%) 1 (1.9%) N/A
Ring use last 30 days (n; % yes) N/A 16 (100%) N/A 53 (98.1%) >0.9999b
aFollow-up visits were pooled for each treatment arm.
bFisher's exact test comparing ring use between placebo and dapivirine arms. All other P values represent Fisher's exact tests comparing baseline versus all follow-up visits in each arm.

Cervicovaginal proteome alterations between baseline and follow-up visits in dapivirine and placebo arms

Mass spectrometry analysis of CVL samples identified 405 human proteins. In the dapivirine arm, 28 proteins (6.9%) were differentially abundant (P adjusted P < 0.05) between baseline and follow-up visits, with 21 proteins (5.2%) differentially abundant between baseline and follow-up visit 1, seven proteins (1.7%) between baseline and follow-up visit 2, and two proteins (0.5%) between follow-up visits 1 and 2 (Fig. 1a, Supplementary Table 1, ANXA11 and PSMB1 were differentially abundant compared with baseline at both follow-up visits. Differentially abundant proteins between baseline and follow-up visit 1 were related to necrosis, degranulation of cells, and quantity of granulocytes (Table 2). Leukocyte extravasation signalling and ILK signalling were canonical pathways associated with proteins that were differentially abundant between baseline and visit 1 (Table 3). Hierarchical cluster analysis of all differentially abundant proteins trended to cluster by visit (chi-square P = 0.068) (Fig. 1b). In the placebo arm, 18 proteins (4.4%) were differentially abundant (adjusted P < 0.05) between baseline and follow-up visits, with 11 (2.7%) proteins differentially abundant between baseline and follow-up visit 1, seven proteins (1.7%) between baseline and follow-up visit 2, and two proteins (0.5%) between follow-up visits 1 and 2 (Fig. 1a, Supplementary Table 2, CALML3 was significantly different compared with baseline at both follow-up visits. Cell movement and degranulation of neutrophils were biofunctions significantly associated with proteins differentially abundant between baseline and visit 1 in the placebo arm (Table 2). Canonical pathways associated with differentially abundant proteins between baseline and visit 1 were related to inflammation including fMLP signalling in neutrophils and integrin signalling. Hierarchical clustering of differentially abundant proteins indicated that the samples tended to cluster by visit (Fig. 1c).

Fig. 1:
Host proteome changes in cervicovaginal mucus over time in adolescent girls using dapivirine and placebo vaginal rings.
Table 2 - Biofunctions associated with dapivirine and placebo vaginal ring use.
Arm Comparison Pathway Proteins P value (z score)
Dapivirine Baseline versus visit 1 Necrosis ASAH1, BPI, CAMP, CAPN1, CAST, CDH1, MMP8, MMP9, PEBP1, PSMB1, SERPINB4, TF, TPD52 7.34E-06 (−2.035)
Dapivirine Baseline versus visit 1 Degranulation of cells ACTN1, ASAH1, BPI, CAMP, CAPN1, CDH1, LTA4H, MMP8, MMP9, PEBP1, PSMB1, TF 4.64E-13 (−1.025)
Dapivirine Baseline versus visit 1 Angiogenesis BPI, CAMP, CAPN1, CDH1, MMP8, MMP9, TF 1.83E-04 (−0.798)
Dapivirine Baseline versus visit 1 Cell movement of leukocytes APBB1IP, CAMP, CAST, CDH1, MMP8, MMP9 5.20E-04 (−0.865)
Dapivirine Baseline versus visit 1 Quantity of granulocytes ARHGDIB, CAMP, MMP8, MMP9, TF 3.64E-05 (1.89)
Dapivirine Baseline versus visit 1 Inflammation of body cavity CAMP, CDH1, MMP8, MMP9, PSMB1, SERPINB13, TF 2.04E-04 (2.188)
Placebo Baseline versus visit 1 Cell movement ACTR2, ACTR3, ARPC2, ATP5F1B, CALML3, IGLV3-1 4.56E-03 (−2.224)
Placebo Baseline versus visit 1 Degranulation of neutrophils ACTR2, CAND1, PRDX4, QSOX1 6.74E-05 (NA)
Placebo Baseline versus visit 1 Organization of cytoplasm ACTR2, ACTR3, ARPC2, ATP5F1B, CALML3 4.10E-03 (−1.612)

Table 3 - Canonical pathways associated with dapivirine or placebo vaginal ring use.
Arm Comparison Pathway Proteins P value
Dapivirine Baseline versus visit 1 ILK signaling ACTN1, CDH1, MMP9 5.89E-04
Dapivirine Baseline versus visit 1 Leukocyte extravasation signaling ACTN1, MMP8, MMP9 6.61E-04
Placebo Baseline versus visit 1 Remodeling of epithelial adherens junctions ACTR2, ACTR3, ARPC2 4.17E-06
Placebo Baseline versus visit 1 FcÎ3 receptor-mediated phagocytosis in macrophages and monocytes ACTR2, ACTR3, ARPC2 1.10E-05
Placebo Baseline versus visit 1 fMLP signalling in neutrophils ACTR2, ACTR3, ARPC2 2.09E-05
Placebo Baseline versus visit 1 CD28 signaling in T Helper cells ACTR2, ACTR3, ARPC2 2.29E-05
Placebo Baseline versus visit 1 Integrin signalling ACTR2, ACTR3, ARPC2 1.26E-04

To determine if background longitudinal proteome variability contributed to proteins associated with treatment arm proteome, differences in all substudy participants was assessed. When both treatment arms were combined, there were 29 (7.2%) proteins differentially abundant between baseline and follow-up visits (adjusted P < 0.05), with 23 (5.7%) differentially abundant between baseline and visit 1, nine (2.2%) between baseline and visit 2, and two (0.5%) between visit 1 and visit 2 (Supplementary Figure 1a, Supplementary Table 3, Four proteins were differentially abundant compared with baseline at both follow-up visits. There was no clustering of these proteins by treatment arm (P = 0.615 Fisher's exact test) but they trended to cluster by time in trial (P = 0.066, chi-square) (Supplementary Figure 1b, Cell movement, apoptosis, and degranulation of cells were biofunctions associated with baseline to visit 1 whereas degranulation of cells was also associated with baseline to visit 2. Samples clustered by reported condom use in the past 30 days (Fisher's exact P = 0.0012, Supplementary Figure 1b,, but not by reported unprotected vaginal sex (Fisher's exact P = 0.4715) or reported vaginal sex in the past 30 days (Fisher's exact P = 0.2083) (data not shown). Condom use did associate with reported receptive oral sex (Fisher's exact P < 0.0001), but samples did not cluster by oral sex (Fisher's exact P = 0.5045).

Vaginal microbiome does not change with dapivirine ring use

Mass spectrometry identified 2467 bacterial proteins from 15 genera. Lactobacillus was the most commonly identified bacterium, followed by Gardnerella, Prevotella, Atopobium, and Mobiluncus (Fig. 2a and b, Supplementary Figure 2, Lactobacillus dominance (>50% Lactobacillus proteins [29]) was not associated with treatment arm (P = 0.3745) or time in the trial (P = 0.7965). Overall, 7.8% of participants (8) belonged to microbiome group 0 (other Lactobacillus), 28.4% (29) to microbiome group 1 (Lactobacillus crispatus), 41.2% (42) to microbiome group 2 (Lactobacillus iners), 16.7% (17) to microbiome group 3 (Gardnerella), and 6% (6) were polymicrobial (Supplementary Figure 2, These microbiome groups were represented in both treatment arms (Fig. 2a). There was no difference in proportion of bacterial genera (Fig. 2b) or bacterial diversity (Shannon's H) by treatment arm (Fig. 2c). There were no significant changes in the proportion of any bacterial genera between baseline and all follow-up visits, or within each treatment arm (Fig. 2d, e). However, the proportion of L. crispatus significantly increased over time (paired data, baseline versus follow-up 1, P = 0.0010; follow-up 1 versus 2, P < 0.001) and this was accompanied by a significant decrease in L. iners (paired data, follow-up 1 versus 2 P < 0.001) (Fig. 2f).

Fig. 2:
Vaginal microbial proteome in adolescents using dapivirine or placebo vaginal rings.

Bacterial functional pathway differences with ring use

Bacterial metabolic pathways were examined to determine if ring use was associated with any functional differences. Sixty-four percent (64.7%) of the bacterial proteins matched to one or more functions using KEGG gene ontology. These bacterial functions were primarily related to carbohydrate metabolism (43.9%), energy metabolism (17.2%), and translation (10.2%) at the higher level categorization of functions (b-level). At the lower level of categorization (ko-level) 18 high-coverage bacterial functions were identified (Fig. 3a). The most abundant ko-level functions were glycolysis/gluconeogenesis (ko00010) (20.9%), carbon fixation (ko00710) (12%), and pyruvate metabolism (ko00620) (9.5%). No bacterial functions were differentially abundant between treatment arm or between baseline and all follow-up visits in each treatment arm (Fig. 3b--d). In a paired analysis aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis (ko00970) was significantly decreased at follow-up visit 1 compared with baseline in the dapivirine arm, although this did not pass correction for multiple comparisons (−0.56% decrease, P = 0.077).

Fig. 3:
Functional microbiome differences associated with dapivirine and placebo vaginal ring use in adolescent girls.

Sexual behaviours associated with the cervicovaginal proteome and functional microbiome

Although participants agreed to use condoms during the trial, approximately a third of substudy participants (31.3% placebo, 26.4% dapivirine) reported unprotected vaginal sex in the previous 30 days during at least one follow-up visit. Differentially abundant proteins between baseline and follow-up visits clustered by reported condom use (Fisher's exact P = 0.0012), with proteins associated with neutrophils (DEF1 P = 0.001, MMP8 P = 0.026, and PERM P = 0.021) increased in participants reporting no condom use (Fig. 4a, Supplementary Figure 1b, When stratified by condom use and reported vaginal sex, these neutrophil factors remained lowest in adolescents reporting both vaginal sex and condom use (’protected vaginal sex’), and highest in those reporting vaginal sex without condom use (’unprotected vaginal sex’) (Fig. 4b). Condom use in the past 30 days was associated with a significant increase in Mobiluncus (P = 0.0053, fold change = 8.09E-03) and a significant decrease in Pseudomonas (P = 0.0206, fold change = -4.52E-03), although this did not pass multiple comparisons correction (Fig. 4c). There was no significant difference in Mobiluncus based on oral sex in the previous 30 days. The fold change of these bacteria between adolescent girls reporting condom use and those with no reported condom use were small and these bacterial species were present at low levels (<0.5% of microbiome). The identified neutrophil factors were negatively correlated with Mobiluncus counts (DEF1 Spearman's r = -0.348, P = 0.00039; MMP8 r = −0.209, P = 0.037; PERM r = -0.300, P = 0.0024) but not with Pseudomonas. In adolescents reporting no condom usage, the bacterial function ko00051 fructose and mannose metabolism was significantly increased (abundance 3.6 versus 2.7%, P = 0.0255) and ko00970 aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis was significantly decreased (1.4 versus 1.9%, P = 0.0255) (Fig. 4d and g), although these did not pass multiple comparisons correction. Proteins involved in aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis were primarily derived from Lactobacillus in adolescents who did not report condom use [83.4% of proteins from Lactobacillus (L. crispatus, L. iners), 16.1% from Gardnerella] and equally from Lactobacillus and Gardnerella in those reporting condom use [47.8% from Lactobacillus (L. iners, L. crispatus), 52.1% from Gardnerella] (Fig. 4e). Fructose and mannose metabolism proteins were primarily derived from Lactobacillus (predominantly L. iners) in both groups (89.9% of condom users, 97.6% noncondom users), although reported condom users did have low levels of Prevotella (relative abundance = 6%) and Atopobium (relative abundance = 2%) that contributed to this pathway (Fig. 4h). Proteins from these two functional pathways did not cluster by reported condom use (Supplementary Figure 3, When total bacterial count for each of these pathways was correlated to host proteins that were differentially abundant between baseline and follow-up visits, several proteins were significantly correlated (Fig. 4f and i, Supplementary Table 4, In particular, several proteins related to immune system functioning (LKHA4, MMP8, PSB1) were negatively correlated with each bacterial function whereas proteins related to nucleotide sugar metabolism (NUDT5), protein kinase binding (PEBP1), and glycosaminoglycan biosynthesis (UGDH) were positively correlated with these bacterial functions.

Fig. 4:
Host and functional microbiome differences based on reported condom use in the past 30 days.


Although the dapivirine ring was seen in clinical trials to be well tolerated and reduce HIV risk in adult women, it is important to evaluate this product in adolescents. MTN-023 was conducted in American adolescents and demonstrated the ring was acceptable and well tolerated over 6 months of use [34]. This substudy examined cervicovaginal inflammation and the microbiome in a subset of participants and showed dapivirine ring use did not associate with any large changes to host inflammatory pathways or the vaginal microbiome over time. Reported condom usage was associated with changes in inflammation and functional metabolic pathways in vaginal bacteria. Overall, this trial supports the safety of a dapivirine ring for use in adolescents.

It is important to evaluate potential inflammatory changes associated with topical agents as previous vaginal products have demonstrated an increase in vaginal inflammation, resulting in increased susceptibility to HIV [35–38]. Tenofovir gel, a microbicide that provided significant reduction in HIV acquisition in the CAPRISA 004 trial [39], has been reported to have some immunoregulatory properties [40–42]. Although cluster analysis showed enrichment for pathways relating to neutrophil degranulation and cell movement that differed over time, this was observed in both treatment arms, and only between baseline and the first follow-up visit suggesting that ring use and not treatment arm was responsible for these observed changes. Quantity of granulocytes and leukocyte extravasation signalling were uniquely associated with dapivirine use between baseline and follow-up visit 1, which suggests that any differences in inflammation with dapivirine use could be transient. However, because of the low number of participants in the placebo arm, we may not have had the power to observe similar effects in the placebo arm. Taken together, these results should be validated in a larger study.

Although there have been concerns about differences in the microbiome between adolescents and adults, several studies examining the microbiome in girls prior to the onset of puberty and into adolescence and sexual debut have found similarities to the microbiome of adults, with similar rates of bacterial vaginosis between adolescents and adults [12,15,19–22,24,43,44]. As women with bacterial vaginosis are at increased risk for acquisition of several STIs including HIV [45–53], it is important to determine if topical agents change the vaginal microbiota. Previous vaginal products including nonoxynol-9 and cellulose sulfate significantly altered the vaginal microbiome, increasing bacteria associated with bacterial vaginosis and shifting the microbiome towards a community lacking Lactobacillus[18,54,55]. Furthermore, studies have found that vaginal bacteria modify tenofovir gel efficacy [29]. Phase 1 studies of dapivirine vaginal rings found that the prevalence of pigmented anaerobic Gram-negative rods increased significantly during ring use, Escherichia coli levels decreased, and there were no significant changes in Nugent score, or Lactobacillus[56,57]. In our study, Lactobacillus was the most common bacterium identified. Although there were no significant changes in bacterial genera over time, there were significant increases in L. crispatus when both treatment arms were combined, which was accompanied by a significant decrease in L. iners within this study. As L. iners has been associated with cervical inflammation [58–61] and increased susceptibility to STIs including HIV and Chlamydia trachomatis[62–65], these results may represent a shift to a healthier microbiome with either dapivirine or placebo ring use. Indeed, studies using vaginal rings for contraception have found that the mean Nugent score decreased significantly with ring use and Lactobacillus prevalence increased [66]. Although those results are likely because of the estrogen contained in the contraceptive ring, promoting Lactobacillus colonization, our observation may indicate that enrolment in a clinical trial could have positive influences on the microbiome because of enhanced awareness regarding safe sex practices.

Alterations to functional pathways were observed in the microbiome with reported condom use. These functions were related to protein translation and fructose and mannose metabolism, predominantly from L. iners. Fructose and mannose metabolism are important pathways for energy production by Lactobacillus. These functional pathways were negatively correlated with host proteins associated with neutrophils, suggesting a relationship between condom use, changes in bacteria metabolic activity, and inflammation. When these neutrophil proteins were stratified by vaginal sex (no sex, unprotected sex, protected sex), we found the lowest levels of the neutrophil factors in adolescents reporting protected vaginal sex. Follow-up studies investigating soluble metabolites may help better understand these relationships between sexual behaviours, neutrophils, and bacteria metabolism.

There were several limitations of this study. As the sample size in this study allowed us to detect protein level changes above 1.8-fold with 80% power, smaller effects may have gone unnoticed. The data on condom use and vaginal sex were self-reported, which may lead to over-reporting of condom use. Microbiome results were reported using mass spectrometry. Although we have previously demonstrated good concordance between 16S rRNA sequencing and mass spectrometry to identify bacterial taxa, 16S rRNA sequencing tends to detect greater bacterial diversity, which may be a result of the increased dynamic range of the proteome compared with the genome as well as limitations in available databases for proteomics [29,30]. Although we have previously shown mass spectrometry has high sensitivity to identify bacterial species that were present at 0.1% of the population [30] we cannot discount that low abundance bacterial species were not identified in this study. However, mass spectrometry provides species-level identification of bacteria as well as information on functional and metabolic activity, which is not readily available from 16S-based approaches.

The availability of well tolerated and acceptable HIV prevention options are of critical importance for adolescent girls to protect themselves from HIV infection. This study supports the safety profile of dapivirine rings in adolescents.


The authors thank Max Abou and Kenzie Birse for technical support. The MTN is funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (UM1AI068633, UM1AI068615, UM1AI106707), with co-funding from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the National Institute of Mental Health, all components of the U.S. National Institutes of Health. Adolescent Medicine Trials Network for HIV/AIDS Interventions (ATN) is funded by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD 040533).

Author contributions: A.B., S.L.H., J.M., and C.D. designed the study. C.F.Z., L.N.R., and S.H. analyzed the data. C.F.Z., S.M., and G.W. performed the experiments. C.F.Z. and L.N.R. wrote the manuscript. K.E.B. and K.S. are the study protocol chairs.

Conflicts of interest

The MTN-023/IPM 030 trial was designed and implemented by the Microbicide Trials Network (MTN) in conjunction with the Adolescent Medicine Trials Network for HIV/AIDS Interventions (ATN). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The vaginal rings used in this study were developed and supplied by the International Partnership for Microbicides (IPM).


1. 2016, U.F.S.N. (2016).
2. Glynn JR, Carael M, Auvert B, Kahindo M, Chege J, Musonda R, et al. Why do young women have a much higher prevalence of HIV than young men? A study in Kisumu, Kenya and Ndola, Zambia. AIDS 2001; 15: (Suppl 4): S51–S60.
3. Marrazzo JM, Ramjee G, Richardson BA, Gomez K, Mgodi N, Nair G, et al. VOICE Study Team. Tenofovir-based preexposure prophylaxis for HIV infection among African women. New Engl J Med 2015; 372:509–518.
4. Van Damme L, Corneli A, Ahmed K, Agot K, Lombaard J, Kapiga S, et al. FEM-PrEP Study Group. Preexposure prophylaxis for HIV infection among African women. N Engl J Med 2012; 367:411–422.
5. Delany-Moretlwe S, Lombard C, Baron D, Bekker LG, Nkala B, Ahmed K, et al. Tenofovir 1% vaginal gel for prevention of HIV-1 infection in women in South Africa (FACTS-001): a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis 2018; 18:1241–1250.
6. Thurman AR, Clark MR, Hurlburt JA, Doncel GF. Intravaginal rings as delivery systems for microbicides and multipurpose prevention technologies. Int J Womens Health 2013; 5:695–708.
7. Baeten JM, Palanee-Phillips T, Brown ER, Schwartz K, Soto-Torres LE, Govender V, et al. MTN-020–ASPIRE Study Team. Use of a vaginal ring containing dapivirine for HIV-1 prevention in women. New Engl J Med 2016; 375:2121–2132.
8. Nel A, van Niekerk N, Kapiga S, Bekker LG, Gama C, Gill K, et al. Ring Study Team. Safety and efficacy of a dapivirine vaginal ring for HIV prevention in women. New Engl J Med 2016; 375:2133–2143.
9. Baeten J, Palanee-Phillips T, Mgodi N, Ramjee G, Gati B, Mhlanga F, et al. MTN-025/HOPE Study Team. High adherence and sustained impact on HIV-1 incidence: final results of an open-label extension trial of the dapivirine vaginal ring. In: IAS. Mexico City, Mexico; 2019.
10. Nel A, Malherbe M, Mans W, Van Baelen B, van Niekerk N, Louw C, et al.Safety, adherence, and HIV-1 seroconversion in DREAM - an open-label dapivirine vaginal ring trial. In: 9th SA AIDS Conference. Durban, South Africa; 2019.
11. Roberts L, Liebenberg L, Barnabas S, Passmore JA. Vaginal microbicides to prevent human immunodeficiency virus infection in women: perspectives on the female genital tract, sexual maturity and mucosal inflammation. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2012; 26:441–449.
12. Porter KA, Turpin J, Begg L, Brown G, Chakhtoura N, Church E, et al. Understanding the intersection of young age, mucosal injury, and HIV susceptibility. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 2016; 32:1149–1158.
13. Ghanem KG, Shah N, Klein RS, Mayer KH, Sobel JD, Warren DL, et al. HIV Epidemiology Research Study Group. Influence of sex hormones, HIV status, and concomitant sexually transmitted infection on cervicovaginal inflammation. J Infect Dis 2005; 191:358–366.
14. Hwang LY, Scott ME, Ma Y, Moscicki AB. Higher levels of cervicovaginal inflammatory and regulatory cytokines and chemokines in healthy young women with immature cervical epithelium. J Reprod Immunol 2011; 88:66–71.
15. Alvarez-Olmos MI, Barousse MM, Rajan L, Van Der Pol BJ, Fortenberry D, Orr D, Fidel PL. Vaginal lactobacilli in adolescents: presence and relationship to local and systemic immunity, and to bacterial vaginosis. Sexually Transm Dis 2004; 31:393–400.
16. Barousse MM, Van Der Pol BJ, Fortenberry D, Orr D, Fidel PL Jr. Vaginal yeast colonisation, prevalence of vaginitis, and associated local immunity in adolescents. Sex Transm Infect 2004; 80:48–53.
17. Shrier LA, Bowman FP, Lin M, Crowley-Nowick PA. Mucosal immunity of the adolescent female genital tract. J Adolesc Health 2003; 32:183–186.
18. Pellett Madan R, Dezzutti CS, Rabe L, Hillier SL, Marrazzo J, McGowan I, et al. Microbicide Trials Network Biomedical Sciences working Group and the MTN 004 Protocol Team. Soluble immune mediators and vaginal bacteria impact innate genital mucosal antimicrobial activity in young women. Am J Reprod Immunol 2015; 74:323–332.
19. Mitchell CM, Fredricks DN, Winer RL, Koutsky L. Effect of sexual debut on vaginal microbiota in a cohort of young women. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120:1306–1313.
20. Yamamoto T, Zhou X, Williams CJ, Hochwalt A, Forney LJ. Bacterial populations in the vaginas of healthy adolescent women. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2009; 22:11–18.
21. Madan RP, Carpenter C, Fiedler T, Kalyoussef S, McAndrew TC, Viswanathan S, et al. Altered biomarkers of mucosal immunity and reduced vaginal Lactobacillus concentrations in sexually active female adolescents. PloS one 2012; 7:e40415.
22. Hickey RJ, Zhou X, Settles ML, Erb J, Malone K, Hansmann MA, et al. Vaginal microbiota of adolescent girls prior to the onset of menarche resemble those of reproductive-age women. mBio 2015; 6:e00097-15.
23. Jespers V, Hardy L, Buyze J, Loos J, Buve A, Crucitti T. Association of sexual debut in adolescents with microbiota and inflammatory markers. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 128:22–31.
24. Vodstrcil LA, Twin J, Garland SM, Fairley CK, Hocking JS, Law MG, et al. The influence of sexual activity on the vaginal microbiota and Gardnerella vaginalis clade diversity in young women. PloS One 2017; 12:e0171856.
25. Fethers KA, Fairley CK, Morton A, Hocking JS, Hopkins C, Kennedy LJ, et al. Early sexual experiences and risk factors for bacterial vaginosis. J Infect Dis 2009; 200:1662–1670.
26. Fethers K, Twin J, Fairley CK, Fowkes FJ, Garland SM, Fehler G, et al. Bacterial vaginosis (BV) candidate bacteria: associations with BV and behavioural practices in sexually-experienced and inexperienced women. PloS One 2012; 7:e30633.
27. Bunge KE, Levy L, Szydlo DW, Zhang J, Gaur AH, Reirden D, et al. MTN-023/IPM 030 Study Team. Brief report: phase IIa safety study of a vaginal ring containing dapivirine in adolescent young women. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2020; 83:135–139.
28. Birse K, Arnold KB, Novak RM, McCorrister S, Shaw S, Westmacott GR, et al. Molecular signatures of immune activation and epithelial barrier remodeling are enhanced during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle: implications for HIV susceptibility. J Virol 2015; 89:8793–8805.
29. Klatt NR, Cheu R, Birse K, Zevin AS, Perner M, Noel-Romas L, et al. Vaginal bacteria modify HIV tenofovir microbicide efficacy in African women. Science 2017; 356:938–945.
30. Zevin AS, Xie IY, Birse K, Arnold K, Romas L, Westmacott G, et al. Microbiome composition and function drives wound-healing impairment in the female genital tract. PLoS Pathog 2016; 12:e1005889.
31. Burgener A, Tjernlund A, Kaldensjo T, Abou M, McCorrister S, Westmacott GR, et al. A systems biology examination of the human female genital tract shows compartmentalization of immune factor expression. J Virol 2013; 87:5141–5150.
32. Gaujoux R, Seoighe C. A flexible R package for nonnegative matrix factorization. BMC Bioinformat 2010; 11:367.
33. Team R. RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio Inc. 2015.
34. Bunge KE, Levy L, Szydlo DW, Zhang J, Gaur AH, Reirden D, et al. Phase IIa safety study of a vaginal ring containing dapivirine in adolescent young women. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2020; 83:135–139.
35. Fields S, Song B, Rasoul B, Fong J, Works MG, Shew K, et al. New candidate biomarkers in the female genital tract to evaluate microbicide toxicity. PloS One 2014; 9:e110980.
36. Van Damme L, Chandeying V, Ramjee G, Rees H, Sirivongrangson P, Laga M, Perriëns J. Safety of multiple daily applications of COL-1492, a nonoxynol-9 vaginal gel, among female sex workers. COL-1492 Phase II Study Group. AIDS 2000; 14:85–88.
37. Van Damme L, Govinden R, Mirembe FM, Guedou F, Solomon S, Becker ML, et al. CS Study Group. Lack of effectiveness of cellulose sulfate gel for the prevention of vaginal HIV transmission. New Engl J Med 2008; 359:463–472.
38. Van Damme L, Ramjee G, Alary M, Vuylsteke B, Chandeying V, Rees H, et al. COL-1492 Study Group. Effectiveness of COL-1492, a nonoxynol-9 vaginal gel, on HIV-1 transmission in female sex workers: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2002; 360:971–977.
39. Abdool Karim Q, Abdool Karim SS, Frohlich JA, Grobler AC, Baxter C, Mansoor LE, et al. CAPRISA 004 Trial Group. Effectiveness and safety of tenofovir gel, an antiretroviral microbicide, for the prevention of HIV infection in women. Science 2010; 329:1168–1174.
40. Hladik F, Burgener A, Ballweber L, Gottardo R, Vojtech L, Fourati S, et al. Mucosal effects of tenofovir 1% gel. eLife 2015; 4:304525.
41. McGowan I, Hoesley C, Cranston RD, Andrew P, Janocko L, Dai JY, et al. A phase 1 randomized, double blind, placebo controlled rectal safety and acceptability study of tenofovir 1% gel (MTN-007). PloS One 2013; 8:e60147.
42. Castillo-Mancilla JR, Meditz A, Wilson C, Zheng JH, Palmer BE, Lee EJ, et al. Reduced immune activation during tenofovir-emtricitabine therapy in HIV-negative individuals. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2015; 68:495–501.
43. Ravel J, Brotman RM, Gajer P, Ma B, Nandy M, Fadrosh DW, et al. Daily temporal dynamics of vaginal microbiota before, during and after episodes of bacterial vaginosis. Microbiome 2013; 1:29.
44. Brotman RM, Ravel J, Cone RA, Zenilman JM. Rapid fluctuation of the vaginal microbiota measured by Gram stain analysis. Sex Transm Infect 2010; 86:297–302.
45. Kenyon C, Colebunders R, Crucitti T. The global epidemiology of bacterial vaginosis: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 209:505–523.
46. Thurman AR, Kimble T, Herold B, Mesquita PM, Fichorova RN, Dawood HY, et al. Bacterial vaginosis and subclinical markers of genital tract inflammation and mucosal immunity. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 2015; 31:1139–1152.
47. Myer L, Denny L, Telerant R, Souza M, Wright TC Jr, Kuhn L. Bacterial vaginosis and susceptibility to HIV infection in South African women: a nested case-control study. J Infect Dis 2005; 192:1372–1380.
48. Brotman RM. Vaginal microbiome and sexually transmitted infections: an epidemiologic perspective. J Clin Invest 2011; 121:4610–4617.
49. Cohen CR, Lingappa JR, Baeten JM, Ngayo MO, Spiegel CA, Hong T, et al. Bacterial vaginosis associated with increased risk of female-to-male HIV-1 transmission: a prospective cohort analysis among African couples. PLoS Med 2012; 9:e1001251.
50. Martin HL, Richardson BA, Nyange PM, Lavreys L, Hillier SL, Chohan B, et al. Vaginal lactobacilli, microbial flora, and risk of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and sexually transmitted disease acquisition. J Infect Dis 1999; 180:1863–1868.
51. Taha TE, Hoover DR, Dallabetta GA, Kumwenda NI, Mtimavalye LA, Yang LP, et al. Bacterial vaginosis and disturbances of vaginal flora: association with increased acquisition of HIV. AIDS 1998; 12:1699–1706.
52. van de Wijgert JH, Morrison CS, Brown J, Kwok C, Van Der Pol B, Chipato T, et al. Disentangling contributions of reproductive tract infections to HIV acquisition in African Women. Sex Transm Dis 2009; 36:357–364.
53. van de Wijgert JH, Morrison CS, Cornelisse PG, Munjoma M, Moncada J, Awio P, et al. Bacterial vaginosis and vaginal yeast, but not vaginal cleansing, increase HIV-1 acquisition in African women. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2008; 48:203–210.
54. McGowan I, Gomez K, Bruder K, Febo I, Chen BA, Richardson BA, et al. Phase 1 randomized trial of the vaginal safety and acceptability of SPL7013 gel (VivaGel) in sexually active young women (MTN-004). AIDS 2011; 25:1057–1064.
55. Ravel J, Gajer P, Fu L, Mauck CK, Koenig SS, Sakamoto J, et al. Twice-daily application of HIV microbicides alter the vaginal microbiota. mBio 2012; 3:e00370–e00312.
56. Chen BA, Panther L, Marzinke MA, Hendrix CW, Hoesley CJ, van der Straten A, et al. Phase 1 safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of dapivirine and maraviroc vaginal rings: a double-blind randomized trial. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2015; 70:242–249.
57. Nel A, Haazen W, Nuttall J, Romano J, Rosenberg Z, van Niekerk N. A safety and pharmacokinetic trial assessing delivery of dapivirine from a vaginal ring in healthy women. AIDS 2014; 28:1479–1487.
58. Petrova MI, Reid G, Vaneechoutte M, Lebeer S. Lactobacillus iners: friend or foe?. Trends Microbiol 2017; 25:182–191.
59. Ravel J, Gajer P, Abdo Z, Schneider GM, Koenig SS, McCulle SL, et al. Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011; 108: (Suppl 1): 4680–4687.
60. Jespers V, Kyongo J, Joseph S, Hardy L, Cools P, Crucitti T, et al. A longitudinal analysis of the vaginal microbiota and vaginal immune mediators in women from sub-Saharan Africa. Sci Rep 2017; 7:11974.
61. Dabee S, Barnabas SL, Lennard KS, Jaumdally SZ, Gamieldien H, Balle C, et al. Defining characteristics of genital health in South African adolescent girls and young women at high risk for HIV infection. PloS One 2019; 14:e0213975.
62. Edwards VL, Smith SB, McComb EJ, Tamarelle J, Ma B, Humphrys MS, et al. The cervicovaginal microbiota-host interaction modulates Chlamydia trachomatis infection. mBio 2019; 10:e01548–e01619.
63. Amabebe E, Anumba DOC. The vaginal microenvironment: the physiologic role of lactobacilli. Front Med (Lausanne) 2018; 5:181.
64. Balle C, Lennard K, Dabee S, Barnabas SL, Jaumdally SZ, Gasper MA, et al. Endocervical and vaginal microbiota in South African adolescents with asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Sci Rep 2018; 8:11109.
65. Tamarelle J, de Barbeyrac B, Le Hen I, Thiebaut A, Bebear C, Ravel J, Delarocque-Astagneau E. Vaginal microbiota composition and association with prevalent Chlamydia trachomatis infection: a cross-sectional study of young women attending a STI clinic in France. Sex Transm Infect 2018; 94:616–618.
66. Crucitti T, Hardy L, van de Wijgert J, Agaba S, Buyze J, Kestelyn E, et al. Ring Plus study group. Contraceptive rings promote vaginal lactobacilli in a high bacterial vaginosis prevalence population: a randomised, open-label longitudinal study in Rwandan women. PloS One 2018; 13:e0201003.

adolescents; dapivirine; HIV; microbiome; vaginal ring

Supplemental Digital Content

Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.