Introduction
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, about 169 000 people living with HIV (PLWH) in the United States were over the age of 60 by the end of 2016, representing 17% of the HIV-infected population. The largest percentage increase in HIV prevalence rates from 2012 to 2016 was in the 65 and older population [1]. Among well treated older PLWH, HIV-associated non-AIDS comorbidities, including neurological complications, remain common. Generally milder cognitive impairment may affect up to 50% of PLWH [2]. PLWH can experience poor performance across a range of cognitive domains, including executive, attention, and information processing speed [3]. Increasing age is a risk factor for having HIV-associated cognitive dysfunction, motivating analyses in this age group [4–6].
Chronic immune activation and inflammation in response to HIV infection are associated with increased general morbidity and are a commonly proposed mechanism for the persistence of cognitive impairment despite viral suppression [7,8]. PLWH often display evidence of ongoing immune activation in both plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), even after reaching undetectable plasma viral RNA and among asymptomatic individuals [9–11].
In this study, we examined several promising biomarkers: soluble CD163 (sCD163), soluble CD14 (sCD14), neopterin, IFN γ-induced protein 10 (IP-10/CXCL10), and monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1/CCL2). Although these biomarkers are not specific to HIV, they have been previously linked to poorer outcomes in HIV. sCD163 and sCD14 are nonspecific monocyte/macrophage markers which are shed during activation, and have previously been linked to HIV outcomes, including cognitive impairment [10,12–16]. Neopterin is produced by monocyte/macrophages and thus can also provide information on the activity of these cells [17]. Likewise, neopterin has been linked to poorer brain health in HIV [18]. IP-10 is a chemokine which has been associated with inflammatory diseases; it has been found to stimulate HIV-1 replication through monocyte-derived macrophages and lymphocytes [19,20]. MCP-1 is a chemokine and is a potent monocyte chemoattractant, produced by a variety of cells including monocytes/macrophages [21]. In the context of HIV, it has been implicated in blood–brain barrier disruption and glial activation, as well as brain injury [22,23].
Studies exploring associations among brain imaging metrics and soluble biomarkers often include a study population where some participants do not have viral suppression or are not on combination antiretroviral therapy (cART). Identifying that elevated inflammatory biomarkers in a persistently suppressed and treatment-adherent study group link to brain integrity and cognitive performance would provide valuable insight into the pathophysiology of cognitive impairment.
Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is a commonly used noninvasive MRI technique based on the diffusion of water, which allows for the characterization of white matter microstructure integrity. Quantified DTI metrics include fractional anisotropy, a measure of the directionality of water diffusion, mean diffusivity, a measure of the magnitude of water diffusion, axial diffusivity, a measure of the water diffusivity in the primary direction, and radial diffusivity, a measure of the water diffusivity in the transverse directions [24,25]. In this study, we took an imaging outcomes-focused approach, with the primary aim being to understand the patterns of relationship between several plasma biomarkers of inflammation in the context of HIV infection and brain integrity measured by DTI metrics of brain white matter. We leveraged a clinically relevant population of treatment-adherent and virally suppressed, but cognitively symptomatic, older adults. We hypothesized that a greater degree of inflammation evidenced by higher biomarker concentrations would be associated with worse brain integrity, represented by lower fractional anisotropy or higher mean diffusivity. To demonstrate clinical relevance, we also examined the relationship between DTI metrics and neuropsychological test performance in domains often impaired among PLWH, hypothesizing that abnormal DTI metrics would be reflected in worse performance across the executive, attention, and speed domains, and the global averaged score.
Methods
Participants
HIV-infected participants over 60 years of age were retrospectively drawn from the UCSF HIV Over 60 Cohort and from preintervention assessments from enrollees in a separate ongoing trial underway at the University of California, San Francisco. Participants were recruited between March 2013 and September 2017. Per study protocols, all participants were aged 60 or older, reported persistent viral suppression and were virally suppressed (defined as plasma HIV RNA < 100 copies/ml) at the time of examination. All reported adherence to cART for at least 12 months, and endorsed cognitive symptoms, as defined by an endorsement of ‘almost always,’ ‘very often,’ or ‘fairly often’ for at least one cognitive symptom on the Patient Assessment of Own Functioning questionnaire [26]. Baseline CD4+ cell count and viral load were quantified from clinical labs. In two individuals where laboratory measures were not available, we substituted self-reported current CD4+ cell count. Participants self-reported estimated CD4+ nadir when known (n = 37). Following Frascati guidance at consensus conference attended by a neuroHIV clinician (V.V.) and at least one neuropsychologist (B.M.), individuals were categorized using HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) nosology [27]. In accordance with Frascati guidelines for classifying comorbid conditions into secondary, contributing, and confounding conditions, individuals were excluded if they had confounding conditions such as major neurological or psychiatric conditions [e.g. schizophrenia, multiple sclerosis (MS)], current brain infection, thyroid abnormality, self-reported current substance use disorder, major stroke, or significant traumatic brain injury. Individuals remained eligible for enrollment if they had potential contributing conditions not considered the primary reason for cognitive impairment, compatible with HAND criteria. Participants were selected for this study based on successful acquisition of baseline structural and diffusion MRI scans, blood draws, and neuropsychological tests.
Biomarker acquisition
Cryopreserved plasma aliquots were thawed and prepared following kit manufacturer's guidelines. MCP-1, sCD163, and IP-10 were measured using a custom multiplex kit (RD Systems, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA), acquired on a Luminex 200 analyzer (Luminex, Austin, Texas, USA), and analyzed using Bio-Plex Manager software (Bio-Rad, Hercules, California, USA). Neopterin and sCD14 were measured by ELISA (Neopterin competitive enzyme immunoassay; ALPCO, Salem, New Hampshire, USA; Human CD14 Quantikine ELISA kit, RD Systems), optical density read on a microplate spectrophotometer (Bio-Rad), and standard curve interpolation conducted on Prism version 7.0b (Graphpad Software Inc., San Diego, California, USA). Samples were run in duplicate and the coefficient of variation of replicates were less than 10%.
Examination of biomarker distributions revealed two outliers greater than 4 SDs above the biomarker distribution means – one for neopterin and one for MCP-1. Because these values were considered physiologically plausible, we substituted these outlier values with the next most extreme value in the biomarker distribution during statistical analysis, as has been done previously by our group [15]. The biomarker distributions of sCD163 and IP-10 were log10 transformed prior to statistical analysis.
MRI acquisition
All participants underwent whole-brain imaging on either a Siemens TIM Trio 3 Tesla MRI scanner (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) with a 12-channel head coil or a Siemens Prisma FIT Erlangen, Germany 3-T MRI scanner with a 64-channel head coil. Diffusion imaging was acquired on the Trio with a 2.2 × 2.2 × 2.2 mm voxel size, 220 × 220 field of view (FOV), 8200 ms repetition time (TR), 86 ms echo time (TE), 180° flip angle, gradients applied in 64 directions with a b value of 2000 and 0 s/mm2. Diffusion imaging on the Prisma was acquired with 2.0 × 2.0 × 2.0 mm voxel size, 69 slices, 220 × 220 FOV, 2420 ms TR, 72.2 ms TE, 85/180° flip/refocusing angle, three factor multiband acceleration, echo-planar imaging factor 110, gradients applied in 96 directions with b values of 2500 and 0 s/mm2. All images were visually inspected for quality, excluding any acquisitions which excessive motion or artifacts which would compromise processing.
Neuropsychological testing
All participants underwent neuropsychological testing with a median (range) of 39 (0–128) days from the baseline MRI scan. The 90-min standardized neuropsychological testing battery is designed to capture a wide range of cognitive domains, including episodic memory, language, attention, executive functions, psychomotor speed, motor, and visuo-spatial abilities. As described and utilized in our prior studies, raw scores were standardized and summarized as normalized z-scores [neuropsychological test scores (NPZ)] in each domain and global averaged scores [28–30].
Image processing and analysis
Image processing was carried out on within scanner model groups to control for minor anatomical and diffusion metric differences between the scanners. Diffusion image processing began with denoising [31]. The FSL MCFLIRT algorithm was utilized to align images to the primary volume of the sequence [32]. Data reflecting absolute displacement parameters beyond 1 mm were removed. Background voxels not considered brain tissue were removed using the B0 acquisitions to provide a mask with Otsu thresholding with a 4 mm radius and four iterations to minimize intraclass variance [33,34]. FSL Eddy was applied using the realigned diffusion images, mask, and b vectors and b values to correct for eddy current-induced distortions [35]. The susceptibility distortion corrected diffusion images were then fitted using Dipy with a nonlinear least-squares approach to create the DTI tensor maps [34]. The DTI-TK package was used to construct within-scanner group templates, and align and normalize DTI tensor maps to these templates [36].
We performed region of interest (ROI) analysis by warping the Johns Hopkins University white matter atlas into the within-scanner group template spaces [37]. We then employed Advanced Normalization Tools ImageIntensityStatistics to calculate average fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity values in the genu, body, and splenium of the corpus callosum, the right and left anterior, superior, and posterior corona radiata, and the right and left superior longitudinal fasciculus as defined previously by our group [38]. Average fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity values per atlas label from both scanner groups were combined into a multiscanner ROI analysis (n = 43) by building a generalized linear model using the statsmodels (statsmodels 0.9.0) package in Python 2.7 (Python 2.7.5, GCC 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-28) on linux2, Copyright (c) 2001-2013 Python Software Foundation. http://www.python.org/2.7/license.html), regressing each diffusion metric against biomarker levels and neuropsychological testing results, with the inclusion of age and scanner as covariates [39]. To limit multiple comparisons, we examined axial diffusivity and radial diffusivity in secondary analyses where significant associations with fractional anisotropy or mean diffusivity alterations were noted to better characterize the changes. In addition, we performed exploratory analyses by including either duration of infection or the presence of comorbid conditions as covariates in the regression model to examine if these had any effect on the results.
Tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS) is a commonly used diffusion imaging analysis method which projects subjects’ fractional anisotropy data onto a mean fractional anisotropy tract skeleton before performing voxelwise statistical analysis on the voxels within that skeleton to improve sensitivity, objectivity, and interpretability [40,41]. The statistics are corrected for multiple comparisons by applying 5000 permutations with FSL randomize and threshold-free cluster enhancement [41–43]. We used TBSS to explore the spatial distribution of associations between elevated biomarkers and DTI measurements across the brain white matter without relying on a-priori regions. TBSS was performed individually on within-scanner groups in accordance with the suggestion of the developers.
Results
Study participants’ characteristics
Study participants were predominantly white (91%), male (86%), and well educated (67% completed at least a bachelor's degree, Table 1). All were over 60 years of age, with a median [interquartile range (IQR)] age of 64 (62–66) years old. According to self-reported date of HIV diagnosis, all but two participants had been known to be infected with HIV for at least a decade, with a median (IQR) duration of infection of 27 (24–31) years. The median (IQR) CD4+ cell count was 600 (400–760) cells/μl. For those that knew their estimated CD4+ nadir (n = 37, 86%), the median (IQR) was 150 (50–235). The most common potential secondary or contributing risk factors for impairment included treated depression (n = 9), followed by past heavy use of alcohol or nonspecified substance use and treated sleep apnea (n = 6 for each).
Table 1: Demographic and clinical variables of HIV+ participants.
Neuropsychological performance
The most impaired domain in our population was motor (−1.19 ± 1.20 SDs from normal), and the least impaired domain was memory (0.03 ± 0.87 SDs from normal). Among our 43 participants, the majority were categorized as mildly impaired (37, 86% with mild neurocognitive disorder), with one participant (2%) reaching criteria for HIV-associated dementia and the remaining five (12%) not having sufficient abnormality on neuropsychological testing to meet HAND criteria, despite symptoms.
Diffusion imaging associations
Higher plasma MCP-1, neopterin, and sCD14 levels were associated with worse DTI metrics across multiple regions of the brain (all P values <0.05, Fig. 1). In particular, higher MCP-1 was associated with worse brain integrity in eight out of the eleven ROIs studied [73%, regression coefficients range (5.47E − 04–1.23E − 03), all P < 0.05] and was linked to both fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity across the corpus callosum. Elevated neopterin was associated with higher mean diffusivity in the genu of the corpus callosum (regression coefficient 5.42E − 03, P = 0.012), and elevated sCD14 was associated with lower fractional anisotropy in the bilateral superior corona radiata [regressions coefficients range [−1.30E − 08 to −1.02E − 08], all P < 0.05, Fig. 1]. Regressing IP-10 and sCD163 levels against either fractional anisotropy or mean diffusivity did not meet statistical significance at P less than 0.05 in any ROI studied.
Fig. 1: Results of biomarkers regressed against diffusion tensor imaging metrics.
Axial diffusivity and radial diffusivity were run in secondary analyses to further characterize the regions in which biomarkers significantly associated to the mean diffusivity or fractional anisotropy levels (Table 2). In the regions where MCP-1 and neopterin were significantly associated with mean diffusivity, axial diffusivity and radial diffusivity also significantly associated (P < 0.05, with the exception of the direct association between mean diffusivity in the splenium of corpus callosum with MCP-1, P = 0.056). All significant biomarker associations were directionally consistent with each other, including a direct relationship with mean diffusivity, radial diffusivity, and axial diffusivity, and an indirect relationship with fractional anisotropy.
Table 2: Results of secondary and exploratory regression analyses.
Exploratory analyses including duration of infection and presence of comorbid conditions as covariates in the regression models were run to test the effect of inclusion. Duration of infection did not affect any results – the same regions associated with the same diffusion measures, and duration of infection did not significantly associate with any DTI metrics. Adjusting for the presence of comorbid conditions in regression models retained most results as when run without their inclusion (Table 2). With the added covariate, neopterin no longer linked to mean diffusivity in the genu of corpus callosum, and MCP-1 no longer linked to axial diffusivity in the body of corpus callosum, bilateral superior corona radiata, and left superior longitudinal fasciculus, and no longer linked to any diffusion metric in the splenium of corpus callosum at P less than 0.05, although the direction of the regression coefficient was retained.
Furthermore, there were strong links between neuropsychological performance and worse DTI metrics (Fig. 2). Decreased fractional anisotropy across the corpus callosum, corona radiata, and superior longitudinal fasciculus associated with poorer performance on the global averaged score [regression coefficients range (1.50E − 02–2.26E − 02) all P < 0.05], as well as the executive and speed domains [regression coefficients range (7.40E − 03–1.38E − 02) and (7.92E − 03–1.57E − 02), respectively, all P < 0.05]. Poorer global performance also associated with higher mean diffusivity in the corpus callosum and superior corona radiata [regression coefficients range (−3.43E − 02 to −2.21E − 02), all P < 0.05] and poorer speed domain performance was associated with higher mean diffusivity in the left posterior corona radiata (regression coefficient −1.59E − 02, P = 0.031). Correlations between the attention domain and neuropsychological test performance did not reach significance at P less than 0.05 in any of the studied ROIs.
Fig. 2: Results of neurocognitive test performance regressed against diffusion tensor imaging metrics.
TBSS analysis on the Siemens Prisma scanner images (n = 20) revealed correlations at P less than 0.05 between elevated sCD14 and decreased fractional anisotropy in the left corona radiata, and correlations at P less than 0.05 between elevated MCP-1 and higher mean diffusivity in widespread regions of the brain (Fig. 3a and b). TBSS analysis on the Siemens Trio scanner images (n = 23) revealed correlations at P less than 0.05 between elevated MCP-1 and both lower fractional anisotropy and higher mean diffusivity in the corpus callosum (Fig. 3c and d). Neopterin, IP-10, and sCD163 did not reach significance in any voxels in the skeleton, and sCD14 did not reach significance in any voxel on the Siemens Trio images.
Fig. 3: Diffusion tensor imaging metrics significantly associate with plasma biomarker levels of monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 and soluble CD14 in tract-based spatial statistics analysis.
Discussion
We demonstrate a link between elevated nonspecific plasma biomarkers of inflammation and physiological changes in brain integrity among predominately older men living with chronic HIV infection and suppressed plasma HIV RNA. On ROI analysis, higher plasma MCP-1, neopterin, and sCD14 levels each associated with either higher mean diffusivity, lower fractional anisotropy, or both, which is consistent with the direction of change expected with brain white matter injury. Both ROI and voxel-wise TBSS analysis highlight that elevated plasma MCP-1 is prominently associated with lower fractional anisotropy and higher mean diffusivity across widespread areas in the brain. We performed secondary statistical analyses on axial diffusivity and radial diffusivity metrics in the regions that mean diffusivity and fractional anisotropy were significantly associated to elevated biomarkers to better characterize the white matter alterations, where we found that the increased diffusivity detected by mean diffusivity was reflected by significantly higher metrics in both radial diffusivity and axial diffusivity.
Diffusion MRI is a sensitive but nonspecific method of characterizing white matter, and these associations may be explained by the potential interaction of a variety of different physiological and pathological conditions in the brain. Higher mean diffusivity and lower fractional anisotropy, as we linked to higher inflammatory biomarker levels, are generally interpreted as reflecting worse integrity, though areas of crossing white matter fibers complicate interpretation. Alterations in mean diffusivity and radial diffusivity are consistent with previous findings in HIV literature, and were proposed to indicate inflammatory demyelination, though definitive interpretation in the context of multiple potentially underlying processes including inflammation, demyelination, axonal injury, or cell infiltration may be difficult [11,44–47]. axial diffusivity can be interpreted as reflective of axonal health, and ongoing axonal injury measured by elevated CSF neurofilament protein was identified in both HIV-associated dementia and cognitively asymptomatic HIV patients [48,49]. In the context of MS, a disease characterized by inflammatory demyelination and axonal injury, both axial diffusivity increases and decreases have been found; potential explanations include an unclear directional effect of chronic inflammation on axial diffusivity over long periods of time or that axial diffusivity increases may reflect compensatory mechanisms in the presence of white matter damage [50]. The associations with higher axial diffusivity we find in our study were not previously reported and warrant further investigation. Widespread involvement of MCP-1 implicates monocyte-associated inflammation in peripheral blood associated with central nervous system alterations and could include blood–brain barrier disruption as contributors to white matter integrity as detected by DTI analysis [51,52]. This is supported by the associations of neopterin, an immune activation marker, and sCD14, a monocyte activation marker [17,53,54]. Overall, these results are in-line with the hypothesis that in PLWH, persistent inflammation and immune activation impact brain health despite persistent viral suppression.
Connections between DTI metrics and neuropsychological test scores in the global, executive, and psychomotor speed domains add further evidence that the physiological changes we identify have clinical relevance, and are consistent with our previously published data [55]. In our initial analysis, we failed to find significant associations between plasma biomarkers and neuropsychological testing. Previous results with larger study populations (n = 253) and others (n = 68) connected inflammatory biomarkers with neuropsychological test scores, suggesting that we had insufficient power in the current study to identify these associations, though our samples may have also differed in the degree of impairment or in other demographic variables [10,15].
Our study population was carefully selected to consist of older individuals under stable and successful antiretroviral treatment. This approach strengthens the clinical relevance of our conclusions as these findings demonstrate that despite optimal adherence to cART and suppression of viral RNA to unquantifiable levels, white matter damage remains linked to elevated inflammatory biomarkers. This suggests that cART may not be enough to fully eliminate the physiological changes in the brain we detect by DTI, in turn correlating to neuropsychological performance. The selection of individuals who are cognitively symptomatic similarly strengthens the clinical relevance of our finding, as this is the population likely to seek care for cognitive issues. However, broad generalizability of these data to individuals with substantial cognitive confounding conditions and to those who are asymptomatic or inadequately treated is not possible. The presence of potential risk factors classified as secondary or contributing does not preclude HAND diagnosis but may play a nonnegligible role in white matter health. It was not possible for us to exclude all comorbidities as the majority of these older participants present at least one (n = 29, 67%). Inclusion of comorbidities as a covariate in our models did not significantly alter our results linking fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, and radial diffusivity to MCP-1, although many axial diffusivity associations no longer met significance and neopterin was no longer linked to mean diffusivity. These may reflect lower sensitivity and low power due to smaller sample size. Our results suggest that within the HIV-infected population, the contributions of elevated MCP-1 and sCD14 to white matter health are likely to be significantly associated independent of other comorbidities.
Most of our participants have a long history of infection over two decades (n = 41, 95%). Thus, the white matter injury we detect may be a legacy of the pre-cART era that is unable to be fully recovered by cART introduction. In our models, we did not detect any associations between duration of infection and DTI metrics. The associations with current levels of inflammatory biomarkers indicate that, although the initial trigger could have been historical, the effects are enduring. These findings are complementary to our prior work demonstrating an increased atrophy rate associated with HIV infection in a similarly well controlled study population, though there exists conflicting literature reporting stable atrophy rates [56,57].
It is important to consider the setting of this study to understand external validity. The participant population was gathered retrospectively and consists only of self-reported cognitively symptomatic PLWH. This process increased the likelihood that testing abnormalities were true changes from baseline, but also excludes impaired individuals with asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment, which may make up nearly 70% of HAND cases [2]. Likewise, our population consists of aging, predominantly white male individuals, so the results cannot be generalized to a younger age range, or to populations of different ethnic backgrounds or women.
Due to technical changes that occurred at our center over the course of this study, images were acquired on an MRI machine before (Siemens TIM Trio) and after (Siemens Prisma FIT) a software and hardware upgrade, as reported in the methods, which may confound the ROI results where we examined them as one group. Due to the differences in pulse sequence and hardware, the DTI metrics between the scanners differed slightly in both magnitude and variance (Supplemental Table 1, https://links.lww.com/QAD/B549). However, we controlled for this in our statistical analysis, and within-scanner ROI analyses demonstrated similar trends (Supplemental Fig. 1, https://links.lww.com/QAD/B549). Thus, we are confident that the scanner change does not significantly bias the findings. Because we lack a matched control sample population of either HIV-infected asymptomatic or HIV-uninfected individuals to compare to, we can only discuss the links between relative biomarker elevation and diffusion metrics within the HIV-infected, virally suppressed, and symptomatic population. Our study is cross-sectional, which restricts our ability to assign causal direction to the association between inflammatory biomarkers and white matter alterations. As the biomarkers we examined are nonspecific, the associations to HIV are inferred but cannot be definitely confirmed. A longitudinal study including seronegative individuals would better capture the impact of time on the progression of both the biomarkers and the DTI metrics. Future work is planned to examine the impact of higher baseline inflammatory and immune activation markers on quantitative imaging measures of the brain over time.
In conclusion, we demonstrate that in virally suppressed HIV-infected older adults who are optimally adherent to cART with persistently suppressed plasma HIV RNA, elevated inflammatory and immune activation plasma biomarkers MCP-1, neopterin, and sCD14 associate with higher mean diffusivity and lower fractional anisotropy, pointing to brain white matter microstructure abnormality and further evidencing the importance of myeloid origin cells in the pathogenesis of brain abnormalities in older PLWH. Poorer cognitive performance also links to these metrics, supporting the hypothesis that persistent immune activation and inflammation despite viral suppression impacts brain integrity and may contribute to cognitive impairment in the cART era.
Acknowledgements
We thank the study participants and the support of the Memory and Aging Center at UCSF.
The current study was supported by the National Institute of Health grants K24MH098759, P30MH075673, R01NR015223, and R01MH113406.
Author contributions: K.C. contributed to imaging data analysis, statistical analysis, and wrote the article; T.P. contributed to biomarker data acquisition and analysis; Y.C. contributed to imaging data analysis and interpretation; B.M. contributed to neuropsychological data acquisition and interpretation; J.H. contributed to clinical data acquisition and interpretation; S.J. contributed to data acquisition and interpretation; L.R., L.N., R.P., V.V contributed to study design and concept; all authors reviewed the article.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
References
2. Heaton RK, Clifford DB, Franklin DR, Woods SP, Ake C, Vaida F, et al.
HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders persist in the era of potent antiretroviral therapy: CHARTER Study.
Neurology 2010; 75:2087–2096.
3. Woods SP, Moore DJ, Weber E, Grant I.
Cognitive neuropsychology of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders.
Neuropsychol Rev 2009; 19:152–168.
4. Valcour V, Shikuma C, Shiramizu B, Watters M, Poff P, Selnes O, et al.
Higher frequency of dementia in older HIV-1 individuals: the Hawaii aging with HIV-1 Cohort.
Neurology 2004; 63:822–827.
5. Bhaskaran K, Mussini C, Antinori A, Walker AS, Dorrucci M, Sabin C, et al.
Changes in the incidence and predictors of human immunodeficiency virus-associated dementia in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy.
Ann Neurol 2008; 63:213–221.
6. Saylor D, Dickens AM, Sacktor N, Haughey N, Slusher B, Pletnikov M, et al.
HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder-pathogenesis and prospects for treatment HHS Public Access.
Nat Rev Neurol 2016; 12:234–248.
7. Deeks SG, Tracy R, Douek DC.
Systemic effects of inflammation on health during chronic HIV infection.
Immunity 2013; 39:633–645.
8. Rao VR, Ruiz AP, Prasad VR.
Viral and cellular factors underlying neuropathogenesis in HIV associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND).
AIDS Res Ther 2014; 11:13.
9. Booiman T, Wit FW, Maurer I, De Francesco D, Sabin CA, Harskamp AM, et al.
High cellular monocyte activation in people living with human immunodeficiency virus on combination antiretroviral therapy and lifestyle-matched controls is associated with greater inflammation in cerebrospinal fluid.
Open Forum Infect Dis 2017; 4:1–11.
10. Burdo TH, Weiffenbach A, Woods SP, Letendre S, Ellis RJ, Williams KC.
Elevated sCD163 in plasma but not cerebrospinal fluid is a marker of neurocognitive impairment in HIV infection.
AIDS 2013; 27:1387–1395.
11. Vera JH, Guo Q, Cole JH, Boasso A, Greathead L, Kelleher P, et al.
Neuroinflammation in treated HIV-positive individuals: a TSPO PET study.
Neurology 2016; 86:1425–1432.
12. Rahimian P, He JJ.
HIV/neuroAIDS biomarkers.
Prog Neurobiol 2017; 157:117–132.
13. Burdo TH, Lackner A, Williams KC.
Monocyte/macrophages and their role in HIV neuropathogenesis.
Immunol Rev 2013; 254:102–113.
14. Lyons JL, Uno H, Ancuta P, Kamat A, Moore DJ, Singer EJ, et al.
Plasma sCD14 is a biomarker associated with impaired neurocognitive test performance in attention and learning domains in HIV infection.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2011; 57:371–379.
15. Imp BM, Rubin LH, Tien PC, Plankey MW, Golub ET, French AL, et al.
Monocyte activation is associated with worse cognitive performance in HIV-infected women with virologic suppression.
J Infect Dis 2017; 215:114–121.
16. Burdo TH, Lentz MR, Autissier P, Krishnan A, Halpern E, Letendre S, et al.
Soluble CD163 made by monocyte/macrophages is a novel marker of HIV activity in early and chronic infection prior to and after antiretroviral therapy.
J Infect Dis 2011; 204:154–163.
17. Murr C, Widner B, Wirleitner B, Fuchs D.
Neopterin as a marker for immune system activation.
Curr Drug Metab 2002; 3:175–187.
18. Fleischman DA, Arfanakis K, Leurgans S, Keating SM, Lamar M, Bennett DA, et al.
Neopterin is associated with hippocampal subfield volumes and cognition in HIV.
Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflammation 2018; 5:e467.
19. Gisslén M, Chiodi F, Fuchs D, Norkrans G, Svennerholm B, Wachter H, et al.
Markers of immune stimulation in the cerebrospinal fluid during HIV infection: a longitudinal study.
Scand J Infect Dis 1994; 26:523–533.
20. Lane BR, King SR, Bock PJ, Strieter RM, Coffey MJ, Markovitz DM.
The C-X-C chemokine IP-10 stimulates HIV-1 replication.
Virology 2003; 307:122–134.
21. Deshmane SL, Kremlev S, Amini S, Sawaya BE.
Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1): an overview.
J Interf Cytokine Res 2009; 29:313–326.
22. Avison MJ, Nath A, Greene-Avison R, Schmitt FA, Bales RA, Ethisham A, et al.
Inflammatory changes and breakdown of microvascular integrity in early human immunodeficiency virus dementia.
J Neurovirol 2004; 10:223–232.
23. Chang L, Ernst T, St Hillaire C, Conant K.
Antiretroviral treatment alters relationship between MCP-1 and neurometabolites in HIV patients.
Antivir Ther 2004; 9:431–440.
24. Basser PJ, Pierpaoli C.
Microstructural and physiological features of tissues elucidated by quantitative-diffusion-tensor MRI.
J Magn Reson B 1996; 111:209–219.
25. Alexander AL, Lee JE, Lazar M, Field AS.
Diffusion tensor imaging of the brain.
Neurotherapeutics 2007; 4:316–329.
26. Chelune GJ, Heaton RK, Lehman RAW.
Neuropsychological and personality correlates of patients’ complaints of disability.
Advances in clinical neuropsychology 1986; Boston, MA: Springer US, 95–126.
27. Antinori A, Arendt G, Becker JT, Brew BJ, Byrd DA, Cherner M, et al.
Updated research nosology for HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders.
Neurology 2007; 69:1789–1799.
28. Milanini B, Catella S, Perkovich B, Esmaeili-Firidouni P, Wendelken L, Paul R, et al.
Psychiatric symptom burden in older people living with HIV with and without cognitive impairment: the UCSF HIV over 60 cohort study.
AIDS Care 2017; 29:1178–1185.
29. Chiao S, Rosen HJ, Nicolas K, Wendelken LA, Alcantar O, Rankin KP, et al.
Deficits in self-awareness impact the diagnosis of asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment in HIV.
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 2013; 29:949–956.
30. Milanini B, Wendelken LA, Esmaeili-Firidouni P, Chartier M, Crouch P-C, Valcour V.
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) to screen for cognitive impairment in HIV over age 60.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2014; 67:67–70.
31. Veraart J, Novikov DS, Christiaens D, Ades-aron B, Sijbers J, Fieremans E.
Denoising of diffusion MRI using random matrix theory.
Neuroimage 2016; 142:394–406.
32. Jenkinson M, Bannister P, Brady M, Smith S.
Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images.
Neuroimage 2002; 17:825–841.
33. Otsu N.
A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms.
IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 1979; 9:62–66.
34. Garyfallidis E, Brett M, Amirbekian B, Rokem A, van der Walt S, Descoteaux M, et al.
Dipy, a library for the analysis of diffusion MRI data.
Front Neuroinform 2014; 8:8.
35. Andersson JLR, Sotiropoulos SN.
An integrated approach to correction for off-resonance effects and subject movement in diffusion MR imaging.
Neuroimage 2016; 125:1063–1078.
36. Zhang H, Yushkevich PA, Rueckert D, Gee JC.
Unbiased white matter atlas construction using diffusion tensor images.
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2007; 10:211–218.
37. Mori S, Oishi K, Jiang H, Jiang L, Li X, Akhter K, et al.
Stereotaxic white matter atlas based on diffusion tensor imaging in an ICBM template.
Neuroimage 2008; 40:570–582.
38. Samboju V, Philippi CL, Chan P, Cobigo Y, Fletcher JLK, Robb M, et al.
Structural and functional brain imaging in acute HIV.
NeuroImage Clin 2018; 20:327–335.
39. 2010; Seabold S, Perktold J.
Statsmodels: econometric and statistical modeling with python.
http://statsmodels.sourceforge.net/http://statsmodels.sourceforge.net/. [Accessed 8 October 2018].
40. Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Johansen-Berg H, Rueckert D, Nichols TE, Mackay CE, et al.
Tract-based spatial statistics: voxelwise analysis of multisubject diffusion data.
Neuroimage 2006; 31:1487–1505.
41. Smith SM, Johansen-Berg H, Jenkinson M, Rueckert D, Nichols TE, Klein JC, et al.
Acquisition and voxelwise analysis of multisubject diffusion data with tract-based spatial statistics.
Nat Protoc 2007; 2:499–503.
42. Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Woolrich MW, Beckmann CF, Behrens TEJ, Johansen-Berg H, et al.
Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL.
Neuroimage 2004; 23:S208–S219.
43. Winkler AM, Ridgway GR, Webster MA, Smith SM, Nichols TE.
Permutation inference for the general linear model.
Neuroimage 2014; 92:381–397.
44. Oh SW, Shin N-Y, Choi JY, Lee S-K, Bang MR.
Altered white matter integrity in human immunodeficiency virus-associated neurocognitive disorder: a tract-based spatial statistics study.
Korean J Radiol 2018; 19:431.
45. Su T, Caan MWA, Wit FWNM, Schouten J, Geurtsen GJ, Cole JH, et al.
White matter structure alterations in HIV-1-infected men with sustained suppression of viraemia on treatment.
AIDS 2016; 30:311–322.
46. Underwood J, Cole JH, Caan M, De Francesco D, Leech R, Van Zoest RA, et al.
Gray and white matter abnormalities in treated human immunodeficiency virus disease and their relationship to cognitive function.
Clin Infect Dis 2017; 65:422–432.
47. Song SK, Sun SW, Ramsbottom MJ, Chang C, Russell J, Cross AH.
Dysmyelination revealed through MRI as increased radial (but unchanged axial) diffusion of water.
Neuroimage 2002; 17:1429–1436.
48. Beaulieu C.
The basis of anisotropic water diffusion in the nervous system – a technical review.
NMR Biomed 2002; 15:435–455.
49. Jessen Krut J, Mellberg T, Price RW, Hagberg L, Fuchs D, Rosengren L, et al.
Biomarker evidence of axonal injury in neuroasymptomatic HIV-1 patients.
PLoS One 2014; 9:e88591.
50. Fink F, Klein J, Lanz M, Mitrovics T, Lentschig M, Hahn HK, et al.
Comparison of diffusion tensor-based tractography and quantified brain atrophy for analyzing demyelination and axonal loss in MS.
J Neuroimaging 2010; 20:334–344.
51. Yao Y, Tsirka SE.
Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and the blood–brain barrier.
Cell Mol Life Sci 2014; 71:683–697.
52. Semple BD, Kossmann T, Morganti-Kossmann MC.
Role of chemokines in CNS health and pathology: a focus on the CCL2/CCR2 and CXCL8/CXCR2 networks.
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2010; 30:459–473.
53. Hagberg L, Cinque P, Gisslen M, Brew BJ, Spudich S, Bestetti A, et al.
Cerebrospinal fluid neopterin: an informative biomarker of central nervous system immune activation in HIV-1 infection.
AIDS Res Ther 2010; 7:15.
54. Shive CL, Jiang W, Anthony DD, Lederman MM.
Soluble CD14 is a nonspecific marker of monocyte activation.
AIDS 2015; 29:1263–1265.
55. Nir TM, Jahanshad N, Busovaca E, Wendelken L, Nicolas K, Thompson PM, et al.
Mapping white matter integrity in elderly people with HIV.
Hum Brain Mapp 2014; 35:975–992.
56. Sanford R, Fellows LK, Ances BM, Collins DL.
Association of brain structure changes and cognitive function with combination antiretroviral therapy in HIV-positive individuals.
JAMA Neurol 2018; 75:72–79.
57. Clifford KM, Samboju V, Cobigo Y, Milanini B, Marx GA, Hellmuth JM, et al.
Progressive brain atrophy despite persistent viral suppression in HIV patients older than 60 years.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2017; 76:289–297.