Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

CLINICAL SCIENCE

Clinical and procedural characteristics of persons living with HIV presenting with acute coronary syndrome

Moran, Caitlin A.a,c; Southmayd, Geoffreyb; Devireddy, Chandan M.b; Quyyumi, Arshed A.b; Ofotokun, Ighovwerhaa,c; Liberman, Henry A.b; Jaber, Wissamb; Sheth, Anandi N.a,c

Author Information
doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000002393
  • Free

Abstract

Introduction

With effective antiretroviral therapy (ART), persons living with HIV (PLWH) can expect to attain a near-normal life expectancy [1,2]. However, they are at increased risk for age-related comorbidities, including cardiovascular disease (CVD) [3–5]. Indeed, among PLWH, acute coronary syndrome (ACS) events tend to occur at younger ages and with greater morbidity than in the general population [6–8]. This increased risk is thought to be multifactorial, resulting from a greater prevalence of metabolic and behavioral risk factors including smoking [4,9], the effects of the HIV virus on inflammation and immune activation despite viral suppression with ART [10], T-cell depletion and senescence [11,12], and ART, particularly the protease inhibitors [13] and the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor abacavir [14]. Despite this risk, there are relatively few data on coronary artery disease (CAD) severity among PLWH. The Gensini score attempts to quantify the functional significance of a patient's coronary atherosclerotic burden by incorporating a point system for the degree of vessel luminal narrowing that accounts for the specific anatomic location of the stenosis [15]. It is strongly correlated with coronary plaque burden, plaque area, and prognosis [16], and correlates with the duration of other traditional cardiovascular risk factors including smoking [17] and diabetes [18]. However, to our knowledge, only one prior study examined Gensini scores among PLWH presenting with ACS [19].

Recent data also suggest that there are disparities in ACS management for PLWH. Extensive evidence demonstrates that outcomes after ACS are better with drug-eluting stents (DES) than with bare metal stents (BMS) [20–22], including for PLWH [23]. Nonetheless, in one recent sampling of nationwide data in the United States, PLWH who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) following ST-elevation myocardial infarction (MI) (STEMI) had a lower rate of DES placement compared with the general population, even when adjusting for income, hospital type, and primary payer source [24]. National US data also suggest that PLWH hospitalized with MI are less likely to undergo any type of revascularization procedure than HIV-negative controls [25,26]. However, these studies may be confounded by practice and population differences among hospitals located in areas with varying HIV prevalence, and do not include measures of functional CAD severity. The local practice differences where the same physicians are caring for HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients presenting with ACS, and whether CAD severity accounts for any practice differences are unknown. Given the high CAD risk in an aging HIV population, it is increasingly important to define differences in ACS in this population. Here, we present data from PLWH and matched HIV-negative controls who were hospitalized with ACS at two urban academic medical centers in the United States to determine any differences in presentation or management of ACS, or CAD severity by HIV serostatus.

Methods

Study design and patient population

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients admitted to either Emory University Hospital (EUH) or Emory University Hospital Midtown (EUHM), two academic medical centers in the Emory Healthcare network in Atlanta, GA, between October 2006 and October 2012 with a diagnosis of ACS who underwent left heart catheterization (LHC) and had a concurrent diagnosis of HIV. These cases were then matched 1 : 3 on race and sex with an existing cohort of patients without HIV infection who presented to the same hospitals from 2004 to 2013 with a diagnosis of ACS. EUH is a 733-bed tertiary care academic hospital located approximately 7 miles from downtown Atlanta, and EUHM is a 511-bed, community-based, urban-located teaching hospital located just one mile from downtown Atlanta. Combined, EUH and EUHM perform an average of 2105 LHC annually for ACS (945/year at EUH and 1160/year at EUHM). Both hospitals have large catchment areas that include the eight-county metro Atlanta area as well as referrals from throughout the Southeastern United States.

Outcomes

The primary outcome was ACS type. ACS was defined and classified using the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines [27]. STEMI was defined as ST-segment elevation of greater than 0.1 mV in at least two contiguous precordial or adjacent limb leads, a new left bundle branch block, or true posterior MI. Non-STEMI (NSTEMI) was defined as a troponin I elevation in the setting of chest pain or angina equivalence without ST-segment elevation. Unstable angina was defined as chest pain or angina equivalence of new or increasing frequency in the absence of cardiac biomarker elevation or ST-segment elevation.

The secondary outcome was ACS management. Management decisions including surgical, percutaneous, or medical therapies were made according to usual clinical practice and performed with standard technique.

Covariates

HIV infection was determined by third-generation ELISA testing and confirmed by Western Blot. HIV RNA (viral load) and CD4+ T-cell count values were obtained from the most recent data available at the time of admission, including up to 30 days after discharge. CD4+ T-cell count was determined using standard flow cytometric assays. HIV RNA was determined by real-time PCR with a lower limit of detection of 50 copies/ml through most of the study that decreased to 20 copies/ml in 2012. HIV RNA values below the limit of detection were recorded as undetectable. ART and other medication history was obtained from chart review. Additional comorbidity data including hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure and prior stroke was obtained from detailed chart abstraction in addition to International Classification of Diseases, 9th edition (ICD-9) Clinical Modification diagnosis codes. Because diagnosis of most comorbidities requires more than one measurement or fasting measurements [28,29], diagnostic criteria could not be used to determine comorbidity prevalence at the time of ACS presentation. Demographic and behavioral characteristics were obtained from chart review.

Quantification of CAD severity was determined by the Gensini score [15]. Coronary vessel involvement was defined as the number of vessels including the left anterior descending (LAD), left circumflex and right coronary arteries with more than 50% stenosis. When the ramus branch was present and stenotic, it was considered a fourth vessel.

Statistical analysis

Baseline characteristics of cases and controls were compared by chi-square tests or Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables, and Student's t tests or Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for continuous variables, as appropriate. To determine the association of the primary and secondary outcomes with HIV status, conditional logistic regression was performed matching on race and sex. Two separate models were developed, the first to determine the associations between HIV serostatus and ACS type and management when adjusting for age and traditional cardiovascular risk factors, and the second to adjust for CAD severity in addition to cardiovascular risk factors. The first model adjusted for age, smoking status, BMI, hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, and year of intervention, while conditioning on race and sex. The second model included all covariates from the first model as well as the Gensini score to control for CAD severity. Finally, a separate analysis was conducted among PLWH. Given changes in HIV care over time, two-way ANOVA and Chi-square tests were used to determine if differences in ACS presentation or CAD severity occurred by year among PLWH. Similar to the entire cohort, two models were developed to account for age, traditional cardiovascular risk factors, and CAD severity. A logistic regression model controlling for age, sex, race, smoking status, and year of intervention and a second model that included Gensini score were developed to determine the association between the HIV-specific variables CD4+ cell count, HIV viral load, and ART (specifically HIV protease inhibitors and abacavir, which have been epidemiologically associated with CVD risk and/or metabolic complications [14,30]) with ACS type and management.

Analyses were conducted using SAS v9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA). Statistical significance was determined by a P value of less than 0.05. Missing data were handled with a complete case analysis, in which participants with missing covariate data were excluded from models. All data were collected and maintained with approval from the Emory University Institutional Review Board.

Sensitivity analyses

To account for disparate years in which PLWH and HIV-negative controls were enrolled in the study, we performed a sensitivity analysis restricting years from 2006 to 2012 for both groups using fully adjusted models as described above for ACS outcomes and management. Chi-squared tests were performed to assess for differences associated with stent type by year for each group. Finally, to account for up to 20% missingness in some data, we performed a sensitivity analysis with multiple imputation (25 datasets) for our full model for the main outcome measures.

Results

Baseline characteristics

Eighty-six PLWH hospitalized with ACS were matched for sex and race with 263 HIV-negative patients also hospitalized with ACS. PLWH were significantly younger (mean age 53 vs. 60 years), with lower SBP, lower BMI, lower LDL cholesterol, less frequent statin use, lower Framingham risk scores, higher rates of current smoking and higher baseline creatinine levels (Table 1). Median (interquartile range) year of hospitalization was 2010 (2008–2011) for PLWH and 2006 (2005–2011) for controls. Cases and controls had similar prevalence of hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, and prior stroke. Among PLWH, the mean time since HIV diagnosis was just over 10 years. The mean (SD) CD4+ cell count was 389 (304) cells/μl. Thirty percentage had a CD4+ cell count less than 200 cells/μl; 58% were virologically suppressed. Seventy-six percent of PLWH were on ART with 54% on protease inhibitors and 21% on abacavir.

Table 1
Table 1:
Baseline characteristics of persons living with HIV and HIV-negative controls presenting with acute coronary syndrome between 2004 and 2013.

CAD severity at baseline is described in Table 2. PLWH were more likely to have single vessel CAD, while controls were more likely to have three-vessel CAD. However, median Gensini score was significantly higher among PLWH overall (44 vs. 28, P = 0.01), and for those with single-vessel disease (32 vs. 4.25, P < 0.0001). Among PLWH, the most commonly affected vessel was the right coronary artery [38 (44%)], followed by the LAD artery [31 (36%)]. Six (7%) PLWH had left main disease.

Table 2
Table 2:
Coronary artery disease severity at baseline for persons living with HIV and HIV-negative controls presenting with acute coronary syndrome between 2004 and 2013.

Acute coronary syndrome types and interventions

ACS type and interventions are presented in Table 3. Twenty-five (29%) PLWH presented with a STEMI, compared with 31 (12%) controls (unadjusted P = 0.0002). In fully adjusted conditional logistic regression models matched on sex and race and adjusted for year, traditional cardiovascular risk factors (age, smoking, hypertension, BMI, dyslipidemia and diabetes mellitus), and Gensini score, PLWH with ACS were more likely to present with STEMI compared with controls [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 5.05 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.82–14.02]], and less likely to present with NSTEMI [aOR (95% CI): 0.33 (0.14–0.79)].

Table 3
Table 3:
Acute coronary syndrome types and interventions for persons living with HIV and HIV-uninfected controls presenting with acute coronary syndrome between 2004 and 2013.

Among all patients, in fully adjusted models PLWH had greater odds of any revascularization procedure [aOR (95% CI): 2.90 (1.01–8.39)] than controls. Among those undergoing revascularization, there was no statistically significant difference in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) for PLWH compared with controls [aOR (95% CI): 3.55 (0.70–18.03)] after controlling for the above covariates. There were too few events to model the odds of CABG vs. PCI among those presenting with STEMI, although four (17%) of PLWH and no controls presenting with STEMI underwent CABG. Among those PLWH who underwent CABG, most had multivessel disease, although three had LAD disease only, and one each had isolated left main, left circumflex, and first obtuse marginal disease. There was no significant difference in the mean (SD) number of vessels bypassed for PLWH compared with controls [2.67 (0.62) vs. 2.93 (0.27), P = 0.15], although the median Gensini score for PLWH undergoing CABG was higher compared with controls (67 vs. 30.5, P = 0.02).

A total of 203 patients underwent PCI with stent placement. Types of stents placed during each year of the study by HIV status are presented in Fig. 1. Among the 46 PLWH who underwent PCI, 13 (28%) had a DES placed, while 33 (70%) had a BMS placed (Table 3). In contrast, among the 157 control patients who underwent PCI, 125 (83%) had a DES placed, while 23 (15%) had a BMS placed. In the fully adjusted model, PLWH had greater odds of BMS vs. DES placement [aOR (95% CI): 5.94 (1.33–26.55)]. When using multiple imputation to account for missing data in the fully adjusted model, differences in ACS type or stent type remained significant; however, differences in total revascularization were no longer significant.

Fig. 1
Fig. 1:
Comparison of stent type between persons living with HIV and HIV-negative controls who presented with acute coronary syndrome between 2004 and 2013 and underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with stent placement.BMS, bare metal stent; DES, drug-eluting stent; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.

HIV-specific analysis

The associations of ACS type and any revascularization procedure with HIV-specific variables are presented in Table 4. Among PLWH, the proportion of STEMI vs. other ACS types, and CABG vs. PCI did not change by year (P = 0.40 and 0.99, respectively). There was no difference in severity of CAD as measured by number of vessels involved (P = 0.64) or median Gensini score (P = 0.80) by year. Among PLWH, neither CD4+ cell count nor HIV viral load were significantly associated with either STEMI or revascularization after adjusting for age, race, sex, smoking status, year, and Gensini score. Adjusting for the same covariates, there was no significant association between STEMI and use of any ART [aOR (95% CI): 0.72 (0.17–3.16)]. Among those PLWH who were taking ART, there was no association with protease inhibitor-containing regimens and STEMI [aOR (95% CI): 2.87 (0.64–12.98)], there were greater odds of presenting with STEMI vs. NSTEMI/unstable angina [aOR (95% CI): 5.08 (1.02–25.26)] for abacavir-containing regimens. There were also no significant associations between any revascularization and use of any ART [aOR (95% CI): 1.18 (0.22–6.22)], protease inhibitor-containing ART [aOR (95% CI): 2.29 (0.48–11.03)], and abacavir-containing ART [aOR (95% CI): 1.42 (0.24–8.48)].

Table 4
Table 4:
Association of HIV-specific variables with acute coronary syndrome type and revascularization for persons living with HIV who presented with acute coronary syndrome between 2004 and 2013.

Discussion

In this retrospective study of PLWH and race-matched and sex-matched HIV-negative controls who presented with ACS to two urban academic medical centers within the same healthcare system in a high HIV burden area of the southeastern United States, we comprehensively describe ACS type, severity, disease characteristics, and management and compare these by HIV serostatus adjusting for known CVD risk factors and coronary plaque burden. We found that PLWH were younger, were more likely to present with STEMI and less likely to present with NSTEMI, have more frequent single-vessel disease and less frequent triple-vessel disease, than race-matched and sex-matched HIV-negative patients with ACS. Even with more single-vessel disease, PLWH had higher Gensini scores compared with controls, indicating greater and more proximal occlusive disease at presentation.

In contrast to recently published studies comparing nationwide trends in ACS management by HIV status during the same time period that reported a lower rate of revascularization among PLWH [7,26], we observed a greater rate of coronary revascularization procedures among PLWH compared with HIV-negative controls in our fully adjusted model, although this difference did not persist when accounting for missing data with multiple imputations. However, similar to national trends [24,26], among those who underwent PCI with stent placement, PLWH in our cohort were more likely to be treated with BMS and less likely to be treated with DES than HIV-negative controls. Reasons for this discrepancy are unclear and are likely multifactorial. Since this analysis included a single healthcare system, it is unlikely that this difference in stent type was due to variation in practice patterns by region or hospital type as has likely confounded analyses from national datasets. Concerns for increased stent thrombosis risk with medication nonaccess or nonadherence may have directly influenced stent choice in PLWH; however, data on comorbid substance use disorders, income or payer sources of patients were lacking, as historic payer source data is not maintained in the electronic medical record. Substance use disorders are more prevalent among PLWH in general and can be a barrier to medication adherence [31]. Socioeconomic or insurance status may have influenced the decision to shorten the necessary duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) by favoring BMS among PLWH. Outcomes following ACS are improved with DES rather than BMS regardless of HIV serostatus [23,32], and risk of stent thrombosis with newer generation DES is lower, even with shorter duration DAPT [33]; however, guidelines still recommend 12 months of DAPT following DES for ACS [34], which may still affect stent choice among practitioners. Although current management of ACS is moving toward DES for all persons who undergo PCI, these data point to a need for further research to determine if DES are used as extensively among PLWH.

Our observation that PLWH hospitalized with ACS were more likely to have STEMI than their HIV-negative counterparts even after adjusting for age is consistent with the literature. Data from both the United States and France have shown higher rates of STEMI in PLWH who are hospitalized with ACS than in matched HIV-negative controls [25,35], likely related to coronary plaque composition. Two studies evaluating coronary plaque composition among men by computed tomography angiography found that PLWH had a higher prevalence of noncalcified coronary plaques compared with age-matched HIV-negative controls despite similar rates of overall plaque burden [36,37]. Noncalcified plaques are at greater risk for rupture than calcified or mixed plaques, and the higher burden of noncalcified plaques among PLWH likely puts them at greater risk for plaque rupture and STEMI. This hypothesis is supported by the fact that the association between HIV status and STEMI remained statistically significant even when Gensini score was added to traditional cardiovascular risk factors in our multivariable models.

Significantly, we also found that PLWH were more likely to have single-vessel CAD and less likely to have triple-vessel disease compared with the HIV-negative controls, consistent with previous studies that have reported a predominance of single-vessel disease among PLWH [38], likely due to younger age at ACS presentation [39]. However, PLWH with single-vessel disease in our study had higher Gensini scores than controls with single-vessel disease, indicating a greater degree of vessel stenosis. Because the Gensini score accounts for the degree of vessel narrowing and the anatomic location of stenosis, the higher Gensini score among PLWH despite fewer vessels involved suggests that those vessels may have had more severely occlusive proximal disease, more diffuse disease or higher risk lesions. This finding contrasts with an Australian study of 73 PLWH presenting with ACS and matched on age, sex, and smoking status with 87 HIV-negative controls, that found no difference in the number of coronary vessels involved, but that the Gensini score was actually lower among PLWH [19]. Importantly, PLWH in the Australian study had less advanced HIV than in our study (mean CD4+ cell count 510 cells/μl and 89% with an undetectable HIV viral load) [19], suggesting that ongoing HIV viremia and immunosuppression may contribute to atherosclerosis.

In our study among PLWH, current CD4+ cell count, HIV viral load, and ART use were not significantly associated with ACS type or intervention in fully adjusted models; however, sample size limited our ability to draw further conclusions. Among those taking ART, there no association between protease inhibitor use and STEMI presentation rather than NSTEMI/unstable angina; however, there was a statistically significant association between abacavir use and STEMI, as has been seen in prior observational studies [14,40]. Data are mixed regarding the cardiovascular effects of individual antiretroviral drugs or classes. The CVD risk associated with protease inhibitors is thought to be mediated by dyslipidemia and insulin resistance [30]; however, this risk is less clear with the newer protease inhibitors atazanavir and darunavir [41,42]. In fact, ritonavir-boosted atazanavir is associated with a slower progression of atherosclerosis than the lipid-neutral integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) raltegravir [43]. In our study, the two most commonly used protease inhibitors were ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (n = 17) and ritonavir-boosted atazanavir (n = 10). Therefore, it is possible that the lack of effect of protease inhibitors seen in our study may be due in part to the heterogeneity of protease inhibitors used. The association between abacavir use and MI is somewhat controversial, with some studies showing a positive association [14,40], and others showing no significant association [44]. Some experimental ex-vivo data suggest that abacavir may impact endothelial inflammation and/or platelet activation in a reversible manner [45,46]. While we did observe an association between abacavir and STEMI rather than NSTEMI/unstable angina presentation in fully adjusted models, the numbers were small (only seven PLWH on abacavir presented with a STEMI), and these findings would need to be validated in larger studies. Other HIV-specific variables including CD4+ cell count and HIV viral load were not significantly associated with ACS type or management in our study, although both low CD4+ nadir and high HIV viral load are known to be associated with CVD risk [6,47]. It is likely that the cumulative effects of these variables could not be elucidated in our cross-sectional study.

Our study has several limitations. First, its retrospective observational design limits our ability to measure additional confounders or control for unmeasured confounders while reliance on detailed chart abstraction and ICD-9 codes for comorbidity data can resulted in misclassification bias if either group was more engaged in care prior to their ACS event. Since the ACS event was many patients’ first encounter with our healthcare system, detailed comorbidity data prior to presentation could not obtained for some patients. In analyzing data from 2004 to 2013, we were unable to account for the most modern PCI practices; however, our study demonstrates that a discrepancy in stent choice existed at the time that would be important to address in a follow-up study. In this cross-sectional analysis, we were unable to assess mortality, revascularization rate, recurrent ACS, or other major adverse cardiac events, which would additionally inform the management of PLWH who are hospitalized with ACS. Among PLWH, we were unable to assess the duration of ART exposure, CD4+ nadir, and peak or duration of HIV viremia, all of which have been shown to be significantly associated with CVD risk [5,14,47]. Overall small numbers of events limited our ability to perform additional subgroup analyses. Among PLWH we were unable to include those on the most modern ART regimens including second-generation INSTIs, and after guidelines changed to recommend starting ART in all PLWH regardless of CD4+ cell count [48]. Therefore, it may be difficult to generalize these results to PLWH who have been newly diagnosed and treated only with more current ART. On the contrary, data beyond 2013 are not available, but our data remain relevant as individuals currently aging with HIV often have already experienced years of therapy with older regimens under previous HIV treatment guidelines, which may influence their ACS presentation even in the present day. In addition, our HIV population had more advanced disease (30% with stage 3 disease), which may limit generalizability to much of the United States, although is typical for the Southeastern United States [49]. Finally, in limiting our analysis to a single healthcare system, our results may not be generalizable to the rest of the population. However, unlike other studies that have used national databases, our study is more likely to be unaffected by regional and institutional variations in practice patterns and can therefore better assess differences by HIV serostatus.

Conclusion

In our study, PLWH hospitalized with ACS were more likely to present with STEMI, have more severe single-vessel disease, and have higher Gensini scores than their HIV-negative counterparts, suggesting differences in coronary plaque morphology. An observed greater likelihood of BMS vs. DES use in PLWH in the years studied points to the need to ensure that PLWH receive optimal care for non-HIV comorbidities. There were no associations between CD4+ cell count or HIV viral load and ACS management. These findings suggest further investigation of the mechanisms and optimal management of ACS in PLWH is urgently needed to address health conditions in the aging population of PLWH.

Acknowledgements

Authors’ contribution: G.S., C.M.D., A.A.Q., and A.N.S. conceived of the study design. G.S., C.M.D., A.A.Q., H.A.L., and J.W. were involved in data collection. C.A.M. led the analysis and interpretation of study data with significant input from G.S. and A.N.S. The article was drafted by C.A.M. and critically revised for intellectual content by G.S., C.M.D., A.A.Q., H.A.L., J.W., I.O., and A.N.S.

The current work was supported in part by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number UL1TR002378 and KL2TR002381. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

1. Marcus JL, Chao CR, Leyden WA, Xu L, Quesenberry CP Jr, Klein DB, et al. Narrowing the gap in life expectancy between HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected individuals with access to care. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 19992016; 73:39–46.
2. Siddiqi AE, Hall HI, Hu X, Song R. Population-based estimates of life expectancy after HIV diagnosis: United States 2008–2011. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2016; 72:230–236.
3. Aberg JA. Aging, inflammation, and HIV infection. Top Antivir Med 2012; 20:101–105.
4. Losina E, Hyle EP, Borre ED, Linas BP, Sax PE, Weinstein MC, et al. Projecting 10-yr, 20-yr and lifetime risks of cardiovascular disease in persons living with HIV in the US. Clin Infect Dis 2017; 65:1266–1271.
5. Drozd DR, Kitahata MM, Althoff KN, Zhang J, Gange SJ, Napravnik S, et al. Increased risk of myocardial infarction in HIV-infected individuals in North America compared with the general population. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2017; 75:568–576.
6. Hanna DB, Ramaswamy C, Kaplan RC, Kizer JR, Anastos K, Daskalakis D, et al. Trends in cardiovascular disease mortality among persons with HIV in New York City, 2001–2012. Clin Infect Dis 2016; 63:1122–1129.
7. Pearce D, Ani C, Espinosa-Silva Y, Clark R, Fatima K, Rahman M, et al. Comparison of in-hospital mortality from acute myocardial infarction in HIV sero-positive versus sero-negative individuals. Am J Cardiol 2012; 110:1078–1084.
8. Gutierrez J, Albuquerque ALA, Falzon L. HIV infection as vascular risk: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0176686.
9. Rasmussen LD, Helleberg M, May MT, Afzal S, Kronborg G, Larsen CS, et al. Myocardial infarction among Danish HIV-infected individuals: population-attributable fractions associated with smoking. Clin Infect Dis 2015; 60:1415–1423.
10. Longenecker CT, Sullivan C, Baker JV. Immune activation and cardiovascular disease in chronic HIV infection. Curr Opin HIV AIDS 2016; 11:216–225.
11. Kaplan RC, Sinclair E, Landay AL, Lurain N, Sharrett AR, Gange SJ, et al. T cell activation and senescence predict subclinical carotid artery disease in HIV-infected women. J Infect Dis 2011; 203:452–463.
12. Kaplan RC, Kingsley LA, Gange SJ, Benning L, Jacobson LP, Lazar J, et al. Low CD4+ T-cell count as a major atherosclerosis risk factor in HIV-infected women and men. AIDS 2008; 22:1615–1624.
13. Sun D, Wu Y, Yuan Y, Wang Y, Liu W, Yang J. Is the atherosclerotic process accentuated under conditions of HIV infection, antiretroviral therapy, and protease inhibitor exposure? Meta-analysis of the markers of arterial structure and function. Atherosclerosis 2015; 242:109–116.
14. Friis-Moller N, Ryom L, Smith C, Weber R, Reiss P, Dabis F, et al. An updated prediction model of the global risk of cardiovascular disease in HIV-positive persons: the data-collection on adverse effects of anti-HIV drugs (D:A:D) study. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2016; 23:214–223.
15. Gensini GG. A more meaningful scoring system for determining the severity of coronary heart disease. Am J Cardiol 1983; 51:606.
16. Neeland IJ, Patel RS, Eshtehardi P, Dhawan S, McDaniel MC, Rab ST, et al. Coronary angiographic scoring systems: an evaluation of their equivalence and validity. Am Heart J 2012; 164:547–552.e1.
17. Yano M, Miura S, Shiga Y, Miyase Y, Suematsu Y, Norimatsu K, et al. Association between smoking habits and severity of coronary stenosis as assessed by coronary computed tomography angiography. Heart Vessels 2016; 31:1061–1068.
18. Ul Amin R, Ahmedani MAM, Karim M, Raheem A. Correlation between gensini score and duration of diabetes in patients undergoing coronary angiography. Cureus 2019; 11:e4010.
19. O’Dwyer EJ, Bhamra-Ariza P, Rao S, Emmanuel S, Carr A, Holloway CJ. Lower coronary plaque burden in patients with HIV presenting with acute coronary syndrome. Open Heart 2016; 3:e000511.
20. De Felice F, Fiorilli R, Parma A, Musto C, Nazzaro MS, Scappaticci M, et al. Five-year outcomes in patients with chronic total coronary occlusion treated with drug-eluting vs bare-metal stents: a case–control study. Can J Cardiol 2013; 29:945–950.
21. Volodarskiy A, Kumar S, Pracon R, Sidhu M, Kretov E, Mazurek T, et al. Drug-eluting vs bare-metal stents in patients with chronic kidney disease and coronary artery disease: insights from a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Invasive Cardiol 2017; 30:10–17.
22. Sabate M, Raber L, Heg D, Brugaletta S, Kelbaek H, Cequier A, et al. Comparison of newer-generation drug-eluting with bare-metal stents in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a pooled analysis of the EXAMINATION (clinical Evaluation of the Xience-V stent in Acute Myocardial INfArcTION) and COMFORTABLE-AMI (Comparison of Biolimus Eluted From an Erodible Stent Coating With Bare Metal Stents in Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2014; 7:55–63.
23. Ren X, Trilesskaya M, Kwan DM, Nguyen K, Shaw RE, Hui PY. Comparison of outcomes using bare metal versus drug-eluting stents in coronary artery disease patients with and without human immunodeficiency virus infection. Am J Cardiol 2009; 104:216–222.
24. Albaeni A, Harris C, Eid SM, Abougergi MS, Wright SM. HIV status and type of coronary stent placed in patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Coron Artery Dis 2017; 28:239–245.
25. Smilowitz NR, Gupta N, Guo Y, Coppola JT, Bangalore S. Influence of human immunodeficiency virus seropositive status on the in-hospital management and outcomes of patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction. J Invasive Cardiol 2016; 28:403–409.
26. Singh V, Mendirichaga R, Savani GT, Rodriguez AP, Dabas N, Munagala A, et al. Coronary revascularization for acute myocardial infarction in the HIV population. J Interv Cardiol 2017; 30:405–414.
27. O’Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, Casey DE Jr, Chung MK, de Lemos JA, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 61:e78–e140.
28. American Diabetes Association. 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: standards of medical care in diabetes-2019. Diabetes Care 2019; 42: (Suppl 1): S13–S28.
29. Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, Casey DE Jr, Collins KJ, Dennison Himmelfarb C, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018; 71:e127–e248.
30. Friis-Moller N, Reiss P, Sabin CA, Weber R, Monforte A, El-Sadr W, et al. Class of antiretroviral drugs and the risk of myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2007; 356:1723–1735.
31. Hartzler B, Dombrowski JC, Williams JR, Crane HM, Eron JJ, Geng EH, et al. Influence of substance use disorders on 2-year HIV care retention in the United States. AIDS Behav 2018; 22:742–751.
32. Badr S, Minha S, Kitabata H, Fatemi O, Torguson R, Suddath WO, et al. Safety and long-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with human immunodeficiency virus. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2015; 85:192–198.
33. Wang W, Liu J, Fang J, Liu Y, An T, Zou M, et al. The optimal discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Int J Cardiol 2017; 235:73–86.
34. Levine GN, Bates ER, Bittl JA, Brindis RG, Fihn SD, Fleisher LA, et al. 2016 ACC/AHA guideline focused update on duration of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines: an update of the 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention, 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery, 2012 ACC/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease, 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction, 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes, and 2014 ACC/AHA guideline on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Circulation 2016; 134:e123–e155.
35. Lorgis L, Cottenet J, Molins G, Benzenine E, Zeller M, Aube H, et al. Outcomes after acute myocardial infarction in HIV-infected patients: analysis of data from a French nationwide hospital medical information database. Circulation 2013; 127:1767–1774.
36. Post WS, Budoff M, Kingsley L, Palella FJ Jr, Witt MD, Li X, et al. Associations between HIV infection and subclinical coronary atherosclerosis. Ann Intern Med 2014; 160:458–467.
37. Nadel J, O’Dwyer E, Emmanuel S, Huang J, Cheruvu S, Sammel N, et al. High-risk coronary plaque, invasive coronary procedures, and cardiac events among HIV-positive individuals and matched controls. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2016; 10:391–397.
38. Boccara F, Lang S, Meuleman C, Ederhy S, Mary-Krause M, Costagliola D, et al. HIV and coronary heart disease: time for a better understanding. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 61:511–523.
39. Zimmerman FH, Cameron A, Fisher LD, Ng G. Myocardial infarction in young adults: angiographic characterization, risk factors and prognosis (Coronary Artery Surgery Study Registry). J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 26:654–661.
40. Dorjee K, Baxi SM, Reingold AL, Hubbard A. Risk of cardiovascular events from current, recent, and cumulative exposure to abacavir among persons living with HIV who were receiving antiretroviral therapy in the United States: a cohort study. BMC Infect Dis 2017; 17:708.
41. Chow D, Shikuma C, Ritchings C, Guo M, Rosenblatt L. Atazanavir and cardiovascular risk among human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients: a systematic review. Infect Dis Ther 2016; 5:473–489.
42. Guaraldi G, Raggi P. Antiretroviral therapies and cardiovascular risk: true or false?. Atherosclerosis 2017; 263:313–314.
43. Stein JH, Ribaudo HJ, Hodis HN, Brown TT, Tran TT, Yan M, et al. A prospective, randomized clinical trial of antiretroviral therapies on carotid wall thickness. AIDS 2015; 29:1775–1783.
44. Sabin CA, Ryom L, d’Arminio Monforte A, Hatleberg CI, Pradier C, El-Sadr W, et al. Abacavir use and risk of recurrent myocardial infarction. AIDS 2018; 32:79–88.
45. Alvarez A, Orden S, Andujar I, Collado-Diaz V, Nunez-Delgado S, Galindo MJ, et al. Cardiovascular toxicity of abacavir: a clinical controversy in need of a pharmacological explanation. AIDS 2017; 31:1781–1795.
46. Mallon PW, Winston A, Post F, Kenny D, Bergin C, Maughan RT, et al. Platelet function upon switching to taf vs continuing abc: a randomized substudy. In: Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI). Boston, MA, USA; 2018.
47. Silverberg MJ, Leyden WA, Xu L, Horberg MA, Chao CR, Towner WJ, et al. Immunodeficiency and risk of myocardial infarction among HIV-positive individuals with access to care. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 19992014; 65:160–166.
48. Saag MS, Benson CA, Gandhi RT, Hoy JF, Landovitz RJ, Mugavero MJ, et al. Antiretroviral drugs for treatment and prevention of HIV infection in adults: 2018 recommendations of the International Antiviral Society-USA Panel. JAMA 2018; 320:379–396.
49. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Diagnoses of HIV infection in the United States and Dependent Areas, 2017. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2018.
Keywords:

acute coronary syndrome; coronary revascularization; Gensini score; HIV

Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.