Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Long-term virological suppression on first-line efavirenz + tenofovir + emtricitabine/lamivudine for HIV-1

 The Long-Term Virological Suppression Working Group for the Collaboration of Observational HIV Epidemiological Research Europe (COHERE) in EuroCoord

doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000002126

Objectives: Evaluate long-term rates of virological failure and treatment interruption for people living with HIV (PLWHIV) with viral suppression on first-line efavirenz + tenofovir disoproxil fumarate + emtricitabine/lamivudine (EFV + TDF + FTC/3TC), and compare these according to patient characteristics.

Methods: PLWHIV enrolled in the Collaboration of Observational HIV Epidemiological Research Europe cohort collaboration, who started first-line EFV + TDF + FTC/3TC at age at least 16 years and had viral suppression (<200 copies/ml) within 9 months were included. Rates of virological failure (≥200 copies/ml) and (complete) treatment interruption were estimated according to years since initial suppression. We used Poisson regression to examine associations of baseline characteristics with rates of virological failure or treatment interruption.

Results: Among 19 527 eligible PLWHIV with median (interquartile range) follow-up 3.7 (2.0–5.6) years after initial viral suppression, the estimated rate of the combined incidence of virological failure or treatment interruption fell from 9.0/100 person-years in the first year to less than 4/100 person-years beyond 3 years from suppression; considering only those remaining on EFV + TDF + FTC/3TC, the combined rate dropped from 8.2/100 person-years in the first year to less than 3.5/100 person-years beyond 3 years. PLWHIV with injecting drug-related or heterosexual transmission were at higher risk of virological failure or treatment interruption, as were those of Black ethnicity. PLWHIV aged less than 35 years were at higher risk of virological failure and treatment interruption.

Conclusion: PLWHIV starting first-line EFV + TDF + FTC/3TC had low rates of virological failure and treatment interruption up to 10 years from initial suppression. Demographic characteristics can be used to identify subpopulations with higher risks of these outcomes.

Correspondence to Oliver Stirrup, Institute for Global Health, University College London, Mortimer Market Centre, off Capper Street, London WC1E 6JB, UK. E-mail:

Received 7 September, 2018

Revised 26 November, 2018

Accepted 29 November, 2018

Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text and are provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal's Website (

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Back to Top | Article Outline


The combination of efavirenz (EFV), tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and emtricitabine (FTC) or lamivudine (3TC) was established as preferred first-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) for HIV in 2013 WHO guidelines [1]. However, first-line EFV is no longer the preferred choice in most patients [2] because of the availability of new combinations with greater efficacy and fewer side effects and emergence of high levels of transmitted resistance to nonnucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors in some low/middle income countries (LMICs) [3]. Despite reductions in newly diagnosed people living with HIV (PLWHIV) starting EFV + TDF + FTC/3TC, large numbers remain on this regimen [4] and so there is a need to evaluate its long-term effectiveness.

An analysis from the UK Collaborative HIV Cohort (UK CHIC) Study showed that PLWHIV on ART regimens with initial viral suppression have annual rates of virological rebound (200 copies/ml threshold) that decrease from around 9/100 person-years in the first year to less than 3/100 person-years after some years on treatment [5]; the authors projected that some PLWHIV would maintain suppression for decades without treatment change. However, few studies have evaluated long-term viral suppression using a single combination.

We estimated rates of virological failure, treatment interruption and treatment switches for PLWHIV with initial viral suppression on first-line EFV + TDF + FTC/3TC within a multinational collaboration of European HIV cohort studies. We evaluated demographic and clinical risk factors for these events.

Back to Top | Article Outline


We analysed data, merged in June 2015, from 20 cohorts in the Collaboration of Observational HIV Epidemiological Research Europe (COHERE) [6]. Additional data were added from the UK CHIC September 2016 dataset, to align last recorded follow-up with other cohorts.

PLWHIV were included if they were ART-naïve at cohort enrolment and started first-line EFV + TDF + FTC/3TC at age at least 16 years with viral suppression (defined as one measurement undetectable or <200 copies/ml) within 9 months. Initial regimen was ignored if it changed within 1 week of first treatment. PLWHIV were excluded if their last viral load measurement was less than 9 months after starting ART, if treatment was interrupted before viral suppression or if at least one pre-ART viral load measurement was either undetectable or ≤50 copies/ml within 1 year prior to starting ART (to remove those who may have started ART before the date recorded). COHERE cohorts with fewer than 20 PLWHIV meeting the inclusion criteria were dropped.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Statistical analysis

Follow-up started at the date of viral suppression. Virological failure was defined as one measurement ≥ 200 copies/ml to allow consistency of analysis across cohorts and over the timespan considered. Treatment interruption was defined as cessation of all ART, but interruptions of up to 1 week were ignored. We also estimated rates of virological failure whilst on EFV + TDF + FTC/3TC, of complete interruption of ART directly from treatment with EFV + TDF + FTC/3TC and of switching from EFV + TDF + FTC/3TC to any other regimen.

Piecewise exponential time-to-event models were used to estimate event rates, which were estimated for yearly intervals from initial viral suppression, with a single rate estimated for follow-up more than 9 years. Rates were first estimated without adjustment for patient characteristics. For virological failure and treatment interruption, cause-specific piecewise exponential models were fitted with censoring for the other event (i.e. only the first virological failure or interruption event was counted): these were used to estimate the rates and cumulative incidence of each event, accounting for the competing risk of the other [7].

We estimated adjusted associations of the virological failure and treatment interruption outcomes with patient sex, mode of acquisition (MSM [reference], female heterosexual, male heterosexual, female IDU, male IDU), ethnicity (white [reference], Black, Asian, other), prior AIDS diagnosis, baseline CD4+ cell count (0–200 [reference], 200–350, 350–500, >500 cells/μl) and viral load (0–20k, 20k–100k [reference], 100k–500k, >500k copies/ml), time-updated age (<25, 25–35, 35–45 [reference], 45–55, >55 years), year of starting ART (2002–2004, 2005–2006, 2007–2008, 2009–2010 [reference], 2011–2012, 2013–2014) and cohort. For five cohorts, ethnicity was not recorded so this variable was set to reference (i.e. ‘white’) for the purpose of multivariable analysis. For categorical variables, the group with highest frequency was chosen as reference. Baseline CD4+ cell counts and viral load were defined as the last measurement obtained within the 6-month period before ART start. Follow-up was censored at 6 months after last recorded viral load or at death. The adjusted analyses were conducted without censoring at switch to other ART regimen.

For analyses adjusted for patient characteristics, full covariate data were available in 83.0% of cases (ignoring ethnicity for cohorts without this information recorded). Multiple imputation using chained equations was implemented using the Stata ‘ice’ package [8], with 17 imputed datasets for each event [9]. Imputation models included log event times and indicators for cohorts and events. Predictive mean matching was employed for baseline CD4+, viral load and age. Imputation models used square root CD4+ cell counts and log10 viral load. MSM status, sex and IDU status were imputed separately; these factors were then combined for analysis models with IDU status considered the primary mode of acquisition in PLWHIV who were also MSM. PLWHIV with transfusion-related or ‘other’ acquisition were excluded due to low numbers.

Back to Top | Article Outline


The study population included 19 527 PLWHIV (Fig. S1, The majority mode of acquisition was MSM (59.6%). Where known, white ethnicity was most common (70.2%) with 20.6% Black and 4.2% Asian ethnicities (further details in Tables S1 and S2,

Unadjusted incidence rates of virological failure and ART interruption according to years since initial viral suppression are shown in Fig. 1a and b. For these analyses (counting only the first event), there were 2655 (13.6%) virological failure events and 1521 (7.8%) treatment interruption events, and median (interquartile range) follow-up was 3.7 (2.0–5.6) years. For analyses restricted to those remaining on EFV + TDF + FTC/3TC, incidence rates are shown in Fig. 1c and d: there were 1879 (9.6%) virological failure outcomes and 1062 (5.4%) treatment interruption outcomes. Results in supplementary material show rates of switching from EFV + TDF + FTC/3TC to any other ART regimen, the combined incidence of ‘virological failure or treatment interruption’ (Fig. S2,, and cumulative incidence functions for virological failure and ART interruption (Fig. S3,

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

Fifty-five PLWHIV with transfusion-acquired HIV and 262 with ‘other’ acquisition were excluded from multivariable analyses. Adjusted associations of patient characteristics with virological failure and treatment interruption are shown in Table 1. MSM had lowest rates of virological failure and treatment interruption while IDU had markedly higher rates of treatment interruption. Black ethnicity was associated with higher rates of virological failure and treatment interruption. A prior AIDS diagnosis was associated with higher rates of virological failure but lower rates of treatment interruption. Baseline CD4+ cell count more than 200 cells/μl was associated with lower rate of virological failure, but those with baseline CD4+ above 500 cells/μl had higher rates of treatment interruption. Rates of virological failure increased with increasing baseline viral load, but there was little evidence that baseline viral load was associated with treatment interruption. Rates of both virological failure and treatment interruption declined in later compared with earlier calendar years of starting ART. Age below 35 years was associated with a higher rate of virological failure and of treatment interruption.

Table 1

Table 1

Back to Top | Article Outline


Amongst PLWHIV enrolled in a large collaboration of European cohort studies starting first-line EFV + TDF + FTC/3TC, rates of virological failure and treatment interruption declined over 3 years following initial virological suppression before stabilizing at low levels: the subsequent combined incidence rate of virological failure or treatment interruption was below 4/100 person-years for PLWHIV remaining on ART, and was below 3.5/100 person-years considering only those on the EFV + TDF + FTC/3TC regimen.

The regimen included in this analysis, EFV + TDF + FTC/3TC, is no longer preferred first-line ART in most patients: WHO now recommends dolutegravir-based ART [2] following evidence that this has improved efficacy and reduced side effects [10]. Tenofovir alafenamide may also have a better side effect profile than TDF in some combinations [11]. However, whilst agreements are in place to provide dolutegravir-based ART at low cost in LMICs [4], EFV + TDF + FTC/3TC is available as a low-cost generic option worldwide and there is not strong evidence for an individual-level benefit of switching off this regimen in virologically suppressed patients [4]. At present, there are also concerns regarding the use of dolutegravir in women who may become pregnant [12].

We found lower rates of both virological failure and treatment interruption for PLWHIV on first-line EFV + TDF + FTC/3TC in comparison to UK patients starting any 3 + drug ART [5], for whom a combined incidence of around 12.5/100 person-years was reported in the first year from baseline (c. 9.0/100 person-years) dropping to less than 6/100 person-years beyond 3 years (c. <4/100 person-years). Long-term studies have not yet been published regarding the durability of viral suppression on first-line dolutegravir-based ART, but as there is evidence from trials of superior viral suppression on dolutegravir vs. EFV at 48, 96 and 144 weeks [13] it is likely that our results reflect an upper limit on the virological failure rates that would be expected for equivalent patients on dolutegravir-based ART.

Black ethnicity was associated with virological failure and treatment interruption, which is consistent with the findings of O’Connor et al.[5] for the United Kingdom. Non-MSM groups were also at higher risk of these events, with particularly strong associations for IDUs as found previously [14]. Rates of virological failure among non-white and non-MSM individuals may vary between countries and healthcare settings, but these findings reinforce the need to identify subpopulations with worse outcomes on ART [15] and understand the underlying causes. Both ethnicity and mode of acquisition are associated with social and economic factors which themselves may vary between cohorts. Age less than 35 was associated with higher rates of virological failure and treatment interruption, consistent with previous findings in both high income [5,14] and LMIC [16] settings. Differences in rates of virological failure between demographic groups are likely to be driven by adherence [17].

Consistent with previous literature [5,18] viral load before starting treatment was associated with rates of virological failure on treatment, whilst baseline CD4+ cell count more than 200 cells/μl was associated with a lower rate of virological failure on treatment [19]. PLWHIV with the highest baseline CD4+ cell counts (>500 cells/μl) had highest rate of treatment interruption, consistent with previous studies [19,20], which could reflect differences in behaviour and clinical counselling for PLWHIV at lower immediate risk of HIV-related morbidity. Most data in this analysis were from the period before European guidelines recommended starting ART in all PLWHIV irrespective of CD4+ cell count.

Rates of virological failure and treatment interruption for PLWHIV declined in later compared with earlier calendar years of ART initiation. This may be linked to a reduction in pill count as combination tablets became available [21], but a limitation of our analysis is that we do not have detailed information on combination dosing (e.g. number of pills/day). Another limitation is that we cannot determine whether treatment switching from first-line regimen was driven by side effects.

We have quantified long-term virological suppression achieved using first-line EFV + TDF + FTC/3TC across a large multinational cohort collaboration. This regimen remains in use worldwide, so the low failure rate with sustained virological suppression for up to a decade on treatment is encouraging. The substantial differences in rates of virological failure and treatment interruption according to demographic and clinical characteristics may be useful for targeted monitoring and adherence interventions.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Contribution of working group members: A.P., D.D. and J.S. developed the research question and study design. D.B. coordinated collaboration between cohorts for the project. O.S. performed the statistical analyses and drafted the initial text of the article. All other working group members contributed data to the analysis, and all working group members were involved in the interpretation of results and final text of the article.

The Long-Term Virological Suppression Working Group: Oliver T. Stirrup1, Jonathan Sterne2, David T. Dunn1, Katharina Grabmeier-Pfistershammer3, Vasileios Papastamopoulos4, Marie-Anne Vandenhende5,6, Ferdinand Wit7, Kholoud Porter1, Barbara Gunsenheimer-Bartmeyer8, Inma Jarrin9, Federico Garcia10, Gerd Fätkenheuer11, Niels Obel12, Anna Schultze13, Andrea Antinori14, Francesca Ceccherini-Silberstein15, Cristina Mussini16, Geneviève Chêne5,17, Bastian Neesgaard18, Antonella Castagna19, Roger Kouyos20, Stéphane De Wit21, Anders Sönnerborg22, Caroline Sabin1, Dolores Merino23, Diana Barger5,17, Andrew Phillips1.

1Institute for Global Health, University College London, London; 2Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK; 3Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; 4Evaggelismos General Hospital, Athens, Greece; 5University Bordeaux, Inserm, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, U1219; 6Bordeaux University Hospital, Hôpital Saint-André, Bordeaux, France; 7Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 8Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany; 9Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid; 10Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Unit, Hospital Universitario San Cecilio, Instituto de Investigación Ibs. Granada, Granada, Spain; 11University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany; 12Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; 13University College London, London, UK; 14INMI, Lazzaro Spallanzani; 15Department of Experimental Medicine and Surgery, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome; 16Clinic of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy; 17ISPED, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France; 18CHIP, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; 19Clinic of Infectious Diseases, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; 20Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland; 21Department of Infectious Diseases, St Pierre University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium; 22Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; 23Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Complejo Hospitalario de Huelva, Huelva, Spain.

Steering Committee – Contributing Cohorts: Ali Judd (AALPHI), Robert Zangerle (AHIVCOS), Giota Touloumi (AMACS), Josiane Warszawski (ANRS CO1 EPF/ANRS CO11 OBSERVATOIRE EPF), Laurence Meyer (ANRS CO2 SEROCO), François Dabis (ANRS CO3 AQUITAINE), Murielle Mary Krause (ANRS CO4 FHDH), Jade Ghosn (ANRS CO6 PRIMO), Catherine Leport (ANRS CO8 COPILOTE), Linda Wittkop (ANRS CO13 HEPAVIH), Peter Reiss (ATHENA), F.W. (ATHENA), Maria Prins (CASCADE), Heiner Bucher (CASCADE), Diana Gibb (CHIPS), G.F. (Cologne-Bonn), Julia Del Amo (CoRIS), N.O. (Danish HIV Cohort), Claire Thorne (ECS, NSHPC), Amanda Mocroft (EuroSIDA), Ole Kirk (EuroSIDA), Christoph Stephan (Frankfurt), Santiago Pérez-Hoyos (GEMES-Haemo), Osamah Hamouda (German ClinSurv), B.G.-B. (German ClinSurv), Nikoloz Chkhartishvili (Georgian National HIV/AIDS), Antoni Noguera-Julian (CORISPE-cat), A.A. (ICC), Antonella d’Arminio Monforte (ICONA), Norbert Brockmeyer (KOMPNET), Luis Prieto (Madrid PMTCT Cohort), Pablo Rojo Conejo (CORISPES-Madrid), Antoni Soriano-Arandes (NENEXP), Manuel Battegay (SHCS), R.K. (SHCS), C.M. (Modena Cohort), Jordi Casabona (PISCIS), Jose M. Miró (PISCIS), A.C. (San Raffaele), Deborah Konopnick (St. Pierre Cohort), Tessa Goetghebuer (St Pierre Paediatric Cohort), A.S. (Swedish InfCare), Carlo Torti (The Italian Master Cohort), C.S. (UK CHIC), Ramon Teira (VACH), Myriam Garrido (VACH), David Haerry (European AIDS Treatment Group).

Executive Committee: S.D.W. (Chair, St. Pierre University Hospital), Jose Mª Miró (PISCIS), Dominique Costagliola (FHDH), Antonella d’Arminio-Monforte (ICONA), A.C. (San Raffaele), Julia del Amo (CoRIS), Amanda Mocroft (EuroSida), Dorthe Raben (Head, Copenhagen Regional Coordinating Centre), G.C. (Head, Bordeaux Regional Coordinating Centre). Paediatric Cohort Representatives: Ali Judd, Pablo Rojo Conejo.

Regional Coordinating Centres: Bordeaux RCC: D.B., Christine Schwimmer, Monique Termote, Linda Wittkop; Copenhagen RCC: Casper M. Frederiksen, Dorthe Raben, Rikke Salbøl Brandt.

Project Leads and Statisticians: Juan Berenguer, Julia Bohlius, Vincent Bouteloup, Heiner Bucher, Alessandro Cozzi-Lepri, François Dabis, Antonella d’Arminio Monforte, Mary-Anne Davies, Julia del Amo, Maria Dorrucci, D.T.D., Matthias Egger, Hansjakob Furrer, Marguerite Guiguet, Sophie Grabar, Ali Judd, Ole Kirk, Olivier Lambotte, Valériane Leroy, Sara Lodi, Sophie Matheron, Laurence Meyer, Jose Mª Miró, Amanda Mocroft, Susana Monge, Fumiyo Nakagawa, Roger Paredes, A.P., Massimo Puoti, Eliane Rohner, Michael Schomaker, Colette Smit, J.S., Rodolphe Thiebaut, Claire Thorne, Carlo Torti, Marc van der Valk, Linda Wittkop.

The COHERE study group has received unrestricted funding from Agence Nationale de Recherches sur le SIDA et les Hépatites Virales (ANRS), France; HIV Monitoring Foundation, The Netherlands; and the Augustinus Foundation, Denmark. The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013) under EuroCoord grant agreement no 260694. The group has also received project-specific funding from UK Medical Research Council (Award Number 164587). A list of the funders of the participating cohorts can be found at

Back to Top | Article Outline

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Back to Top | Article Outline


1. World Health Organization. Consolidated guidelines on the use of antiretroviral drugs for treating and preventing HIV infection. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2013.
2. World Health Organization. Updated recommendations on first-line and second-line antiretroviral regimens and postexposure prophylaxis and recommendations on early infant diagnosis of HIV: interim guidance. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2018.
3. Raffi F, Pozniak AL, Wainberg MA. Has the time come to abandon efavirenz for first-line antiretroviral therapy?. J Antimicrob Chemother 2014; 69:1742–1747.
4. Vitoria M, Hill A, Ford N, Doherty M, Clayden P, Venter F, et al. The transition to dolutegravir and other new antiretrovirals in low-income and middle-income countries: what are the issues?. AIDS 2018; 32:1551–1561.
5. O’Connor J, Smith C, Lampe FC, Johnson MA, Chadwick DR, Nelson M, et al. Durability of viral suppression with first-line antiretroviral therapy in patients with HIV in the UK: an observational cohort study. Lancet HIV 2017; 4:e295–e302.
6. Chêne G, Phillips A, Costagliola D, Sterne JAC, Furrer H, del Amo J, et al. Cohort profile: Collaboration of Observational HIV Epidemiological Research Europe (COHERE) in EuroCoord. Int J Epidemiol 2017; 46:797–797n.
7. Allignol A, Schumacher M, Wanner C, Drechsler C, Beyersmann J. Understanding competing risks: a simulation point of view. BMC Med Res Methodol 2011; 11:86.
8. Royston P, White IR. Multiple imputation by chained equations (MICE): implementation in Stata. J Stat Softw 2011; 45:1–20.
9. White IR, Royston P, Wood AM. Multiple imputation using chained equations: issues and guidance for practice. Stat Med 2011; 30:377–399.
10. Kanters S, Vitoria M, Doherty M, Socias ME, Ford N, Forrest JI, et al. Comparative efficacy and safety of first-line antiretroviral therapy for the treatment of HIV infection: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Lancet HIV 2016; 3:e510–e520.
11. Hill A, Hughes SL, Gotham D, Pozniak AL. Tenofovir alafenamide versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate: is there a true difference in efficacy and safety?. J Virus Erad 2018; 4:72–79.
12. Nakkazi E. Changes to dolutegravir policy in several African countries. Lancet 2018; 392:199.
13. Rutherford GW, Horvath H. Dolutegravir plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors versus efavirenz plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors as initial antiretroviral therapy for people with HIV: a systematic review. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0162775.
14. Tanner Z, Lachowsky N, Ding E, Samji H, Hull M, Cescon A, et al. Predictors of viral suppression and rebound among HIV-positive men who have sex with men in a large multisite Canadian cohort. BMC Infect Dis 2016; 16:590.
15. Dharan NJ, Cooper DA. Long-term durability of HIV viral load suppression. Lancet HIV 2017; 4:e279–e280.
16. Fox MP, Cutsem GV, Giddy J, Maskew M, Keiser O, Prozesky H, et al. Rates and predictors of failure of first-line antiretroviral therapy and switch to second-line ART in South Africa. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2012; 60:428–437.
17. O’Connor JL, Gardner EM, Mannheimer SB, Lifson AR, Esser S, Telzak EE, et al. Factors associated with adherence amongst 5295 people receiving antiretroviral therapy as part of an international trial. J Infect Dis 2013; 208:40–49.
18. Santoro M, Armenia D, Alteri C, Flandre P, Calcagno A, Gori C, et al. Impact of pretherapy viral load on virological response to modern first-line HAART. Antivir Ther 2013; 18:867–876.
19. Jose S, Quinn K, Dunn D, Cox A, Sabin C, Fidler S, et al. Virological failure and development of new resistance mutations according to CD4 count at combination antiretroviral therapy initiation. HIV Med 2016; 17:368–372.
20. Abgrall S, Ingle S, May M, Costagliola D, Mercie P, Cavassini M, et al. Durability of first ART regimen and risk factors for modification, interruption or death in HIV-positive patients starting ART in Europe and North America 2002–2009. AIDS 2013; 27:803–813.
21. Nachega JB, Parienti J-J, Uthman OA, Gross R, Dowdy DW, Sax PE, et al. Lower pill burden and once-daily antiretroviral treatment regimens for HIV infection: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Infect Dis 2014; 58:1297–1307.

* A list of the members of The Long-Term Virological Suppression Working Group is provided in the Acknowledgements.


antiretroviral therapy; viral failure; viral rebound; viral suppression; virological control

Supplemental Digital Content

Back to Top | Article Outline
Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.