Share this article on:

From HIV prevention to non-communicable disease health promotion efforts in sub-Saharan Africa: A Narrative Review

Juma, Kennetha; Reid, Michaelb; Roy, Monikab; Vorkoper, Susanc; Temu, Tecla M.d; Levitt, Naomi S.e; Oladepo, Oladimejif; Zakus, Davidg; Yonga, Geraldh

doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001879
Supplement Article

Objective: To synthesize published literature on noncommunicable disease (NCD) behavior change communication (BCC) interventions in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) among persons living with HIV (PLHIV) and in the general population to inform efforts to adopt similar HIV and NCD BCC intervention activities.

Methods: We conducted a literature review of NCD BCC interventions and included 20 SSA-based studies. Inclusion criteria entailed describing a BCC intervention targeting any four priority NCDs (cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, cervical cancer, and depression) or both HIV and any of the NCDs. The RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) framework was used to assess potential public health impact of these studies. We also solicited expert opinions from 10 key informants on the topic of HIV/NCD health promotion in five SSA countries.

Results: The BCC interventions reviewed targeted multiple parts of the HIV and NCD continuum at both individual and community levels. Various strategies (i.e. health education, social marketing, motivational interviewing, mobile health, and peer support) were employed. However, few studies addressed more than one dimension of the RE-AIM framework. Opinions solicited from the key informants supported the feasibility of integrating HIV and NCD BCC interventions in SSA potentially improving access, service provision and service demand, especially for marginalized and vulnerable populations.

Conclusion: Although HIV/NCD integration can improve effectiveness of preventive services at individual and community levels, potential public health impact of such approaches remain unknown as reach, adoptability, and sustainability of both integrated and nonintegrated NCD BCC approaches published to date have not been well characterized.

aAga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya

bUniversity of California, San Francisco

cFogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland

dDepartments of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA

eUniversity of Cape Town and Chronic Disease Initiative for Africa, South Africa

fUniversity of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria

gDivision of Clinical Public Health, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

hUniversity of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.

Correspondence to Kenneth Juma, Agha Khan University, P.O. Box 39340–00623, Nairobi, Kenya. E-mail:

Received 1 November, 2017

Revised 9 April, 2018

Accepted 23 April, 2018

Back to Top | Article Outline


Health promotion interventions, in particular behavior change communication (BCC) strategies (which utilize different communication channels to promote positive health behaviors at individual and community levels), have been widely applied in developed settings to motivate demand for and adoption of preventive and promotive health practices [1]. The goals of BCC interventions not only include improving disease awareness and uptake of treatment but also promoting adherence to various risk reduction and pharmacologic treatment interventions [2]. Strategies such as school-based programs to reduce risky sexual behavior, work-place programs to improve physical activity, or diabetes-education programs to improve disease self-management are commonly employed in developed country settings to reduce the risk and complications of noncommunicable disease (NCDs) like cancer, cardiovascular disease (CVD), diabetes mellitus and obesity, as well as communicable diseases like HIV. Although data on effectiveness of these strategies in developed country settings has been mixed, there is strong evidence to support some BCC interventions aimed at tobacco cessation and increased physical activity [3].

Data on the effectiveness of BCC interventions in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), which have historically been focused on HIV prevention, is limited. Considerable investment in information-education-communication (IEC) and subsequent BCC strategies in the 1990s had little impact on reported sexual risk behaviors [4]. This led to calls to re-examine the theories and models of behavior change and consider socioeconomic and cultural determinants, such as poverty, sex inequality, sexual identity, stigma, and lack of access to HIV services, that undermine people's abilities to act on prevention advice. As a consequence, HIV prevention interventions have increasingly focused on combining behavioral strategies with biomedical and structural approaches within a broader framework [5], such as the combination of safe-sex counseling and use of preexposure prophylaxis (PreP). Combination approaches that adapt to cultural contexts, populations being addressed, and stage of epidemic, may also be more effective for NCDs [6]. Previously, the HIV response, including BCC activities were organized as ‘vertical’ disease oriented programs [7]. This approach was believed to have yielded more rapid results in weak health systems, but may have aggravated healthcare advances by diverting resources from more holistic preventive approaches [8].

Although there is increasing interest in utilizing BCC interventions to tackle the rising burden of NCDs [9], little is known about the effectiveness or adoptability of NCD BCC interventions in this setting [10,11]. Interest in NCD BCC interventions is increasing commensurate with rising NCD burden: CVD deaths have nearly doubled over the last two decades with an estimated one million deaths in 2013. This burden is magnified among persons living with HIV (PLHIV) who have 50% increased risk of experiencing a CVD event, even after controlling for traditional CVD risk factors [12,13]. Given the substantial resources deployed and health systems developed during the roll out of the global antiretroviral treatment (ART), leveraging lessons from the HIV response, and integrating HIV and NCD care have been suggested as approaches, to better address HIV control and the enormous rise of NCDs in general [14,15].

In this review, we narratively synthesize literature that addresses BCC interventions for NCDs among PLHIV and in the general population in an attempt to further inform the feasibility of integrated HIV/NCD BCC approaches. We apply the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) framework to evaluate the public health impact of various BCC interventions [16]. This approach, which assesses five dimensions of an intervention (reach, efficacy, adoption, implementation, and maintenance), is an expeditious strategy for evaluating the potential public health impact of interventions intended for wide-scale dissemination (Table 1). In addition, we performed key informant interviews with HIV and NCD experts in SSA, in order to highlight gaps in BCC knowledge and identify research priorities.

Table 1

Table 1

Back to Top | Article Outline


We undertook a narrative review of literature between 1970 and 2017, on NCDs and dual HIV/NCD health promotion interventions within SSA. We defined BCC intervention as ‘an interactive process of working with individuals and communities through different communication channels to promote positive health behaviors and support behavior change to maintain health’ [17]. We targeted BCC interventions related to four priority NCDs (CVD, diabetes mellitus, cervical cancer, and depression) and those targeting HIV and any priority NCD. We searched the ‘Awareness, Education & Dissemination’ database – an Endnote folder compiled by a librarian in the HIV/NCD Integration Project, and PubMed utilizing the following search terms; ‘health promotion,’ ‘behavior change communication,’ ‘HIV,’ ‘noncommunicable disease,’ and ‘sub-Saharan Africa’ to identify studies meeting our inclusion criteria. Studies eligible for inclusion were those peer-reviewed, described a BCC intervention or were a synthesis or meta-analyses of target BCC intervention(s), reported at least one BCC outcome, conducted in SSA, and published in English. We excluded studies that did not focus on the health promotion aspects of an intervention. Articles were independently screened for eligibility by two authors based on title and abstract review and then rated as ‘for inclusion,’ ‘potentially eligible,’ or ‘for exclusion.’ Full text articles rated ‘for inclusion’ or ‘potentially eligible’ were reviewed independently by two authors to determine final inclusion in the review.

Data from included studies were extracted separately by four researchers who were blinded to each other's work. Extracted data were then compared for agreement and reconciled through group consensus. Data included basic study characteristics (setting, population, description of intervention and comparator groups, and types of outcomes reported) and completeness of reporting of RE-AIM framework elements as developed by Glasgow et al. [16] (Table 2 ). The RE-AIM model provides a useful framework for determining the public health impact of health promotion interventions, such as those included in this review. The ability of an intervention to have public health impact is dependent not only on intervention effectiveness but also its ability to reach those most in need, ability of institutions/individuals to adopt the intervention, extent to which it can be implemented in various settings as designed, and extent to which it can be maintained over time in resource constrained settings. In our analysis we sought to evaluate the extent of completeness of reporting on each RE-AIM dimension (i.e. whether studies did or did not address the RE-AIM dimensions; Table 1), and to narratively synthesize these dimensions in our study results and conclusions. To highlight the various types of BCC interventions that have been used, we grouped all studies into seven strategy types (Table 3), and presented a synthesis of literature for each main BCC intervention type.

Table 2

Table 2

Table 2

Table 2

Table 3

Table 3

In addition, we conducted a total of 10 key informant interviews (KIIs) with HIV/NCD specialists and program managers (five in HIV and five in NCDs) from five countries in SSA (Kenya, Uganda, Ethiopia, Cameroon, and South Africa). The KIIs solicited perceptions of these experts on the feasibility, opportunities, and challenges of implementing integrated HIV/NCDs BCC interventions using a semi-structured interview guide. Interviews were recorded and later transcribed and analyzed using the ATLAS.ti version 8.0 inductively using grounded theory to identify emergent themes. We conclude this review by presenting a set of priority research questions within the integration of HIV/NCD BCC domain (Table 4).

Table 4

Table 4

Back to Top | Article Outline


Description of included studies

A total of 238 peer reviewed articles were retrieved. Of these, 216 (91%) were excluded for the reasons specified in Fig. 1, resulting in 20 unique studies that met the inclusion criteria (summarized in Table 2 ). Of the 20, 4 (20%) focused on dual HIV/NCDs whereas 16 (80%) focused on NCDs alone. Only four (20%) studies specified a behavior change model or theory as the basis for the intervention and its theoretical mechanism of effect.

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

The greatest number of studies reviewed were conducted in South Africa 6/20 (30%). All studies targeted both sexes, women made up 46.3% (740/1600) of participants in the randomized trials combined. Most of the studies targeted adults 85% (17/20), and the majority of interventions were community-based 65% (13/20).

Back to Top | Article Outline

Completeness of reporting Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance framework elements

There were 15 different combinations of reporting on RE-AIM dimensions; 50% (10) of the articles reported solely on one dimension, 25% (5) reported on two dimensions, 20% (4) reported on three dimensions, 5% (1) reported on four dimensions, and none reported on all five dimensions of the framework. Effectiveness was the most frequently reported dimension (47.2%), followed by implementation (25%), reach (19.4%), maintenance (5.6%), and adoption (2.8%; Table 2 ).

Back to Top | Article Outline

Behavior change communication strategies used for health promotion of noncommunicable diseases

Health education interventions

Nine studies sought to prevent NCDs through health education in health facilities, communities, faith-based settings, or at home. Most health education interventions were targeted at patients, but some targeted health workers and/or policy makers. Cappuccio et al. [23] described a community program to reduce salt intake and blood pressure (BP) levels in Ghana. Population-wide, intensive education sessions open to all villagers, were delivered over a 6-month period. Using a standard health education package from Ghana Health Services, community health workers (CHWs) delivered health promotion messages on major public health issues. Intervention villages received additional lessons on dietary prevention of HTN and advice to limit salt intake. The six intervention villages showed significant reductions in SBP [2.54 mmHg (1.45–6.54)] and DBP [3.95 mmHg (0.78–7.11), P = 0.015] compared with six control villages. There was no change in urinary sodium concentration. The results show that community-level education promoting dietary recommendations can lead to community-level reductions in average salt intake, which can result in significant, albeit small, reductions in individuals’ BP levels.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Social marketing interventions

One intervention [26], assessed the potential use of social marketing to prevent childhood obesity in Western Cape, South Africa utilizing print, radio, television, internet, outdoor media (i.e. billboards, community acting), or a combination of these. The study interviewed school representatives to understand the family, social, nutrition, and physical activity environments of children attending school. Nutrition and physical activity environments at family and community levels were highly complex and characterized by security concerns, lack of organized markets, and inadequate resources for physical activity. The study identified key components of community outreach and mass media to deliver multichannel messaging that would change social norms around food choices and social desirability of exercise. Several opportunities exist for marketing healthy lifestyle to parents of school-going children, including a preference for print, radio, and educational entertainment; use of social role models and opinion leaders to deliver interpersonal messages; and outdoor advertising such as murals.

Back to Top | Article Outline

mHealth interventions

We found three examples of mHealth applications used to target patients or health workers. These include mobile telemedicine for the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of women at risk of cervical cancer [42], mobile phones to facilitate phone-based home glucose monitoring for diabetic patients [22], and mobile learning (mLearning) to provide online training to physicians in remote settings [43]. Littman-Quinn et al. [31] reported on the use of mobile telemedicine to improve access to specialized cervical cancer screening and diagnosis among HIV-positive women, using VIA [42]. Cervical images for 95 HIV-positive women were taken with a mobile phone and transmitted by multimedia messaging service to an off-site gynecologist for remote evaluation using photographic inspection with acetic acid. Results suggest that mobile telemedicine is useful in improving access to cervical cancer screening utilizing the VIA ‘see-and-treat’ approaches among women in remote areas. Similar mHealth initiatives aimed at cervical cancer prevention have been applied to the general populations in Zambia [44] and Cameroon [45].

Back to Top | Article Outline

Motivational interviews

Only one study was found to have utilized motivational Interviews. Louwagie et al. [32] reported the efficacy of brief motivational interview by LHCWs in assisting tuberculosis (TB) patients in a setting with high HIV/TB coinfection rates to quit smoking. Newly diagnosed TB patients in South Africa identified as current smokers were randomized to brief MI intervention by a LHCW or brief smoking cessation advice from a TB nurse. Over 6 months, 21.5% of the intervention group reported sustained abstinence versus 9.3% in the control group [relative risk (RR) = 2.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.34–3.92]. Biochemically verified 6-month sustained abstinence was also higher in the intervention group (RR 2.21, 95% CI = 1.08–4.51) who took carbon monoxide testing. Results demonstrated that motivational interviews by LHCWs to promote smoking cessation approximately doubled sustained smoking abstinence for at least 6 months compared with brief advice alone.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Peer group support

Two studies reported use of peer support approaches. Baumann et al. [22] tested the feasibility of peer support groups to improve diabetes self-care behaviors, glycemic control, social support and emotional well being, and linkage to care over the course of 18-months among adults with type 2 diabetes in Uganda. Patients underwent a 1-day diabetes education session and made weekly contacts with each other by phone or in person over 4 months. Results demonstrated that a short-term peer support program was feasible, improved diabetes care, increased healthy eating behaviors, and achieved significant reductions in DBP and HbA1C values. Sustainability was evaluated beyond 18-months postintervention. Khabala et al. [29] reported on early efficacy and outcomes of MACs designed to improve access to chronic HIV/NCD care and support within city slums in Kenya. Results showed strong evidence for feasibility, including offloaded consultations from regular clinic, and found that BP, weight, and laboratory testing were completed correctly in 99% of consultations during MAC attendance.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Multdisease screening campaigns

Five studies reviewed used multidisease campaigns for testing and linkage to care within communities and homes. In the SEARCH study in Uganda, entire communities were invited to community health campaigns. Uptake of screening was high (4282/6844 of residents and 597 for nonresidents), and identified almost half (125/257) of HIV infections as new infections, (18%) 483/2687 of new hypertensive patients, and 2% (63/2672) of new diabetes cases. The SEARCH investigators also provide what little data exists in the published literature on the cost-effectiveness of HIV/NCD integration efforts. In their study, the cost per HIV+ adult identified was $231 ($87–$1245) and the marginal costs of testing for hypertension and diabetes was $1.16/person [46].

Back to Top | Article Outline

Findings from key informants

Interviews with the key informants identified a few emerging themes concerning integration of HIV/NCD BCC interventions including: communication targeting behavior change, perceived feasibility and outcomes of integration, concerns about integration, and facilitators and what is needed for successful integration.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Issues about communication targeting behavior change

Respondents considered communication strategies as critical in an effective BCC intervention. In communication, the kind of information, and how and where it is delivered matters. Multiple communication channels are preferred and should be attractive, sustainable, trustworthy, and adapted to population's preference. Communication channels must deliver messages repeatedly and include a feedback mechanism.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Perceived feasibility and outcomes

Integrating HIV/NCD BCC activities are perceived as feasible for a range of reasons, including similarity in target population, messaging channels, desired outcomes, and existing positive results from pilot studies. There was consensus that integration, if feasible, will require some effort to make it work perfectly. Several potential health system outcomes were cited, including improved effectiveness and efficiency in service delivery and management of HIV/NCD using the same resources, and improved access to services for marginalized populations. Where HIV/NCD is already integrated, achievement of targeted health goals have improved, as compliance and adherence to preventive messages or prescribed care is better.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Integration concerns

Fears exist that integration may compromise existing HIV success and undo the health gains already made. These fears stem from how HIV/NCD integration is perceived. In contrast to the HIV response, NCDs are seen as broad and complicated with low funding support. Exclusivity seen in vertical disease programing where policy, financing, and implementation have unique deliverables limits integration. Concerns of increased workload and levels of NCD knowledge among CHWs working in HIV were also cited.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Facilitators and what is needed for successful integration

Interview participants felt that the biggest facilitator is the number of PLHIV with or at risk of NCDs. They noted that HIV prevention efforts created widespread community structures and a knowledgeable workforce capable of communicating HIV messages that could be used to scale-up integrated HIV/NCD approaches. Positive effectiveness results from integration studies and existing resources like ‘expert patients’ – patients with both HIV/NCD, provided critical support for integration moving forward. Nevertheless, key informants stated that there is need to carefully identify what works in integration, and conduct research to guide new approaches to scale. Following implementation frameworks like RE-AIM that embed the planning and monitoring and evaluation in the early years of implementing integration is important. Suggestions to selectively introduce HIV/NCD integration, starting with the priority NCDs is plausible, and it is important to introduce innovation and creativity that improves outcomes.

Back to Top | Article Outline


BCC interventions in SSA have historically been utilized to address the HIV epidemic and are now beginning to be employed in combating the growing burden of NCDs. This narrative review highlights some of the strategies utilized for NCD health promotion. Although the majority of interventions we identified were targeted only towards NCDs, a small number of studies highlighted the feasibility and effectiveness of integrating HIV and NCD health promotion efforts.

Peer support approaches have been widely deployed to improve HIV outcomes for PLHIV in SSA [47], and studies in this review suggest that similar approaches could be used to support health promotion strategies for NCDs. Similarly, mHealth strategies are increasingly used among PLHIV and there is considerable interest in leveraging such strategies to address NCDs in SSA given that mHealth interventions are relatively democratized, have low barriers to entry and capitalize on the mobile phones already owned and existing data platforms. However, to date, such applications have not always shown impact at scale [48]. Although the mHealth studies in this review demonstrated feasibility and early effectiveness in a variety of NCD diseases and settings, more data on wide-spread implementation and sustainability is needed. In contrast, there is less experience with educational and social marketing interventions. These approaches, although theoretically providing ample reach, have less data to support their effectiveness. The cost-effectiveness of a community-based education approach to reduce blood pressure [23], and the effectiveness of a multilevel marketing strategy to reduce childhood obesity [26] are unknown. Motivational interview, which is ‘a counselling style of guiding to elicit/strengthen personal motivation for behavior change’ [49], has been effectively used to bring about long-term changes in smoking cessation programs in developed countries [50]. However, in our review, we found only one study addressing the role of motivational interview in mitigating NCD risk factors among PLHIV in SSA. Although theoretically a promising strategy, questions remain about how to scale up motivational interview training programs for healthcare workers while ensuring that motivational interview techniques are contextually relevant so that front-line providers in SSA (facing competing demands and limited time) can incorporate these approaches into their clinical practice. Finally, community-based screening interventions, such as the SEARCH study, are among few examples we found that demonstrated both impact at scale and the feasibility of integrating both HIV and NCD health promotion efforts.

In addition, few studies reported on the reach, adoption, or maintenance dimensions of the RE-AIM framework, highlighting ongoing gaps in knowledge of intervention impact and sustainability at scale. Reporting of all RE-AIM dimensions is critical in providing a balanced assessment of internal and external validity, and to address key issues important for dissemination and implementation [16]. For instance, unlike other BCC interventions, which are facility-based or targeting those already in care, community-based screenings have a broader reach to undiagnosed individuals who may be vulnerable or marginalized populations having limited access to care.

Studies reviewed highlighted, however, how implementation of integrated BCC interventions may be more cost-effective and enhance health system effectiveness, particularly in resource-limited settings [51]. Likewise, studies discussed how use of existing HIV CHWs to do community-based NCDs screening, health education, or peer support was likely to improve program sustainability as these workers had close ties to the community and are integrated in the health system [35]. As outlined in the article by Nugent et al. [52] the incremental cost of adding NCD screening (such as for diabetes and hypertension) is small compared with the cost of HIV testing. Furthermore, strategies targeting common sociocultural norms impacting both HIV and NCD-related behaviors may have synergistic effects in driving healthy behavior. For instance, social marketing messaging addresses multiple risks at multiple levels to achieve more than just awareness, but also, social capital and community mobilization, while eliminating barriers to adoption of healthy lifestyles [53].

Opinions solicited from the key informants supported the feasibility of integrating HIV and NCD BCC interventions in SSA and noted that this approach may improve access, service provision and service demand, especially for marginalized and vulnerable populations. Fears that integrating HIV/NCD may interfere with gains made in HIV were cited. However, there was consensus that potential outcomes far outweigh its risks and that several opportunities exist to strengthen integration for both diseases. Nevertheless, there are unique challenges that only apply to HIV or to NCDs (i.e. industry promotion of food, tobacco, and alcohol), and risk factors for communicable diseases and NCD differ. These differences may limit the extent to which BCC interventions can be integrated.

Limitations of this review included the overall small number of integrated HIV-NCD studies in existence, the heterogeneity of the included studies, lack of quantification of study quality, and the paucity of studies reporting on most REACH dimensions, which precluded comparisons between strategies or conclusions regarding the potential impact of HIV/NCD health promotion integration.

In conclusion, although data on integration of HIV/NCD health promotion efforts is limited, our review found a fair amount of evidence to support the feasibility of integrating HIV/NCD within multidisease screening campaigns in Uganda [31,54], Kenya [24,31,35], and South Africa [28]. More generally, strategies already employed in the HIV global response (including peer support and mHealth) have provided program developers and policy makers with the initial experience, tools, and platforms potentially useful in planning NCD health promotion programs. There is a pressing need for more quality research addressing the best way to scale NCD health promotion interventions in high HIV burden settings and the need for more rigorous research methods to characterize important implementation science dimensions that have not been evaluated by the studies included in our survey of the subject.

Back to Top | Article Outline


K.J. was involved in study planning, implementation, data collection, data analysis, and drafting the initial manuscript. M.R. and M. Roy were involved in the study planning, implementation, data analysis, and manuscript writing. G.Y. was involved in the conceptualizing, planning, and writing the manuscript. D.Z. was involved in the selection of the key informants. S.V., T.M.T., N.S.L., O.O., and D.Z. were involved in writing manuscript sections and manuscript editing. K,J., M.R., M. Roy, S.V., T.M.T., N.S.L., O.O., D.Z., and G.Y. approved the final version of the article.

Source of support: this article as part of the Research to Guide Practice: Enhancing HIV/AIDS Platform to Address Non-Communicable Diseases in sub-Saharan Africa was supported by the U.S. National Institutes of Health Fogarty International Center.

Funding: HIV/NCD Integration Project supported data collection for this review.

DISCLAIMER: The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the funding agencies.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Back to Top | Article Outline


1. Vermund SH, Mallalieu EC, Van Lith LM, Struthers HE. Health communication and the HIV continuum of care. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2017; 74 (Suppl 1):S1–S4.
2. Storey D, Seifert-Ahanda K, Andaluz A, Tsoi B, Matsuki JM, Cutler B. What is health communication and how does it affect the HIV/AIDS continuum of care? A brief primer and case study from New York city. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2014; 66 (Suppl 3):S241–S249.
3. McGinnis JM, Williams-Russo P, Knickman JR. The case for more active policy attention to health promotion. Health Aff (Millwood) 2002; 21:78–93.
4. Merson MH, Dayton JM, O’Reilly K. Effectiveness of HIV prevention interventions in developing countries. AIDS 2000; 14 (Suppl 2):S68–84.
5. Sepúlveda J, Smits H, Carpenter C, Curran J, Holzemer WL, Bertozzi SM, et al. PEPFAR implementation: progress and promise. 2007: Washington, D.C.
6. Hankins CA, de Zalduondo BO. Combination prevention: a deeper understanding of effective HIV prevention. AIDS 2010; 24 (Suppl 4):S70–S80.
7. Kharsany ABM, Karim QA. HIV infection and AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa: current status, challenges and opportunities. Open AIDS J 2016; 10:34–48.
8. Reich MR, Takemi K, Roberts MJ, Hsiao WC. Global action on health systems: a proposal for the Toyako G8 summit. Lancet 2008; 371:865–869.
9. Arena R, Guazzi M, Lianov L, Whitsel L, Berra K, Lavie CJ, et al. Healthy lifestyle interventions to combat noncommunicable disease-a novel nonhierarchical connectivity model for key stakeholders: a policy statement from the American Heart Association, European Society of Cardiology, European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation, and American College of Preventive Medicine. Eur Heart J 2015; 36:2097–2109.
10. Stephani V, Opoku D, Quentin W. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials of mHealth interventions against noncommunicable diseases in developing countries. BMC Public Health 2016; 16:572.
11. Palmer M, Sutherland J, Barnard S, Wynne A, Rezel E, Doel A, et al. The effectiveness of smoking cessation, physical activity/diet and alcohol reduction interventions delivered by mobile phones for the prevention of noncommunicable diseases: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0189801.
12. Silverberg MJ, Leyden WA, Xu L, Horberg MA, Chao CR, Towner WJ, et al. Immunodeficiency and risk of myocardial infarction among HIV-positive individuals with access to care. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2014; 65:160–166.
13. Freiberg MS, Chang CC, Kuller LH, Skanderson M, Lowy E, Kraemer KL, et al. HIV infection and the risk of acute myocardial infarction. JAMA Intern Med 2013; 173:614–622.
14. Rabkin M, Nishtar S. Scaling up chronic care systems: leveraging HIV programs to support noncommunicable disease services. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2011; 57 (Suppl 2):S87–S90.
15. Rabkin M, El-Sadr WM. Why reinvent the wheel? Leveraging the lessons of HIV scale-up to confront noncommunicable diseases. Glob Public Health 2011; 6:247–256.
16. Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health 1999; 89:1322–1327.
17. FHI. Behavior change communication (BCC) for HIV/AIDS: a strategic framework. 2002.
18. Gaglio B, Shoup JA, Glasgow RE. The RE-AIM framework: a systematic review of use over time. Am J Public Health 2013; 103:e38–e46.
    19. Abanilla PK, Huang K-Y, Shinners D, Levy A, Ayernor K, de-Graft Aikins A, et al. Cardiovascular disease prevention in Ghana: feasibility of a faith-based organizational approach. Bull World Health Organ 2011; 89:648–656.
      20. Ahmed ME, Abdelrhan SH. The role of medical students in patient education to promote home management of diabetes mellitus in Wad Medani town, Sudan 2003. J Family Community Med 2006; 13:41–46.
        21. Assah FK, Atanga EN, Enoru S, Sobngwi E, Mbanya JC. Community-based peer support significantly improves metabolic control in people with Type 2 diabetes in Yaounde, Cameroon. Diabet Med 2015; 32:886–889.
          22. Baumann LC, Frederick N, Betty N, Jospehine E, Agatha N. A demonstration of peer support for Ugandan adults with type 2 diabetes. Int J Behav Med 2015; 22:374–383.
          23. Cappuccio FP, Kerry SM, Micah FB, Plange-Rhule J, Eastwood JB. A community programme to reduce salt intake and blood pressure in Ghana [ISRCTN88789643]. BMC Public Health 2006; 6:13.
          24. Chamie G, Kwarisiima D, Clark TD, Kabami J, Jain V, Geng E. Leveraging rapid community-based HIV testing campaigns for noncommunicable diseases in rural Uganda. PLoS One 2012; 7:e43400.
          25. Chigbu CO, Onyebuchi AK, Onyeka TC, Odugu BU, Dim CC. The impact of community health educators on uptake of cervical and breast cancer prevention services in Nigeria. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2017; 137:319–324.
            26. Evans WD, Blitstein J, Lynch C, De Villiers A, Draper C, Steyn N, et al. Childhood obesity prevention in South Africa: media, social influences, and social marketing opportunities. Soc Mark Q 2009; 15:22–48.
            27. Gessler N, Labhard ND, Stolt P, Manga E, Balo JR, Boffolo A, et al. The lesson of Monsieur Nouma: effects of a culturally sensitive communication tool to improve health-seeking behavior in rural Cameroon. Patient Educ Couns 2012; 87:343–350.
              28. Govindasamy D, Kranzer K, van Schaik N, Noubary F, Wood R, Walensky RP, et al. Linkage to HIV, TB and noncommunicable disease care from a mobile testing unit in Cape Town, South Africa. PLoS One 2013; 8:e80017.
              29. Khabala KB, Edwards JK, Baruani B, Sirengo M, Musembi P, Kosgei RJ, et al. Medication Adherence Clubs: a potential solution to managing large numbers of stable patients with multiple chronic diseases in informal settlements. Trop Med Int Health 2015; 20:1265–1270.
              30. Kotwani P, Balzer L, Kwarisiima D, Clark TD, Kabami J, Byonanebye D, et al. SEARCH Collaboration. Evaluating linkage to care for hypertension after community-based screening in rural Uganda. Trop Med Int Health 2014; 19:459–468.
                31. Littman-Quinn R, Mibenge C, Antwi C, Chandra A, Kovarik CL. Implementation of m-health applications in Botswana: telemedicine and education on mobile devices in a low resource setting. J Telemed Telecare 2013; 19:120–125.
                32. Louwagie GM, Okuyemi KS, Ayo-Yusuf OA. Efficacy of brief motivational interviewing on smoking cessation at tuberculosis clinics in Tshwane, South Africa: a randomized controlled trial. Addiction 2014; 109:1942–1952.
                33. MakkiAwouda FO, Elmukashfi TA, Hag Al-Tom SA. Effects of health education of diabetic patient's knowledge at Diabetic Health Centers, Khartoum State, Sudan: 2007–2010. Glob J Health Sci 2014; 6:221–226.
                  34. Muchiri JW, Gericke GJ, Rheeder P. Effect of a nutrition education programme on clinical status and dietary behaviours of adults with type 2 diabetes in a resource-limited setting in South Africa: a randomised controlled trial. Public Health Nutr 2016; 19:142–155.
                    35. Pastakia SD, Ali SM, Kamano JH, Akwanalo CO, Ndege SK, Buckwalter VL, et al. Screening for diabetes and hypertension in a rural low income setting in western Kenya utilizing home-based and community-based strategies. Global Health 2013; 9:21.
                    36. Pastakia SD, Karwa R, Kahn CB, Nyabundi JS. The evolution of diabetes care in the rural, resource-constrained setting of Western Kenya. Ann Pharmacother 2011; 45:721–726.
                      37. Rossouw JE, Jooste PL, Chalton DO, Jordaan ER, Langenhoven ML, Jordaan PC, et al. Community-based intervention: the Coronary Risk Factor Study (CORIS). Int J Epidemiol 1993; 22:428–438.
                        38. Singh A, Owusu-Dabo E, Britton J, Munafo MR, Jones LL. Pictures don’t lie, seeing is believing’: exploring attitudes to the introduction of pictorial warnings on cigarette packs in Ghana. Nicotine Tob Res 2014; 16:1613–1619.
                          39. Srinivas SC, Paphitis SA. Hypertension and diabetes mellitus: a preliminary South African health promotion activity using service-learning principles. J Community Health 2016; 41:557–565.
                            40. Venables E, Edwards JK, Baert S, Etienne W, Khabala K, Bygrave H. They just come, pick and go.’ The acceptability of integrated medication adherence clubs for HIV and non communicable disease (NCD) patients in Kibera, Kenya. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0164634.
                              41. Ahmed M, Abdelrhan S. The role of medical students in patient education to promote home management of diabetes mellitus in wad Medani town, Sudan 2003. J Family Community Med 2006; 13:41–46.
                                42. Quinley KE, Gormley RH, Ratcliffe SJ, Shih T, Szep Z, Steiner A, et al. Use of mobile telemedicine for cervical cancer screening. J Telemed Telecare 2011; 17:203–209.
                                43. Chang AY, Ghose S, Littman-Quinn R, Anolik RB, Kyer A, Mazhani L, et al. Use of mobile learning by resident physicians in Botswana. Telemed J E Health 2012; 18:11–13.
                                44. Mwanahamuntu MH, Sahasrabuddhe VV, Pfaendler KS, Mudenda V, Hicks ML, Vermund SH, et al. Implementation of 'see-and-treat’ cervical cancer prevention services linked to HIV care in Zambia. AIDS 2009; 23:N1–N5.
                                45. DeGregorio GA, Bradford LS, Manga S, Tih PM, Wamai R, Ogembo R, et al. Prevalence, predictors, and same day treatment of positive VIA enhanced by digital cervicography and histopathology results in a cervical cancer prevention program in Cameroon. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0157319.
                                46. Chang W, Chamie G, Mwai D, Clark TD, Thirumurthy H, Charlebois ED, et al. Implementation and operational research: cost and efficiency of a hybrid mobile multidisease testing approach with high HIV testing coverage in East Africa. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2016; 73:e39–e45.
                                47. Bateganya M, Amanyeiwe U, Roxo U, Dong M. The impact of support groups for people living with HIV on clinical outcomes: a systematic review of the literature. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2015; (68 Suppl 3):S368–S374.
                                48. Wyber R, Vaillancourt S, Perry W, Mannava P, Folaranmi T, Celi LA. Big data in global health: improving health in low- and middle-income countries. Bull World Health Organ 2015; 93:203–208.
                                49. Resnicow K, McMaster F. Motivational Interviewing: moving from why to how with autonomy support. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2012; 9:19–119.
                                50. Heckman CJ, Egleston BL, Hofmann MT. Efficacy of motivational interviewing for smoking cessation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tob Control 2010; 19:410–416.
                                51. Nigatu T. Integration of HIV and noncommunicable diseases in healthcare delivery in low- and middle-income countries. Prev Chronic Dis 2012; 9:E93.
                                52. Nugent R, Barnabas RV, Golovaty I, Osetinsky B, Roberts DA, Bisson C, et al. Costs and cost-effectiveness of HIV/noncommunicable disease integration in Africa: from theory to practice. AIDS 2018; 32 (Suppl 1):S83–S92.
                                53. Evans WD, Christoffel KK, Necheles JW, Becker AB. Social marketing as a childhood obesity prevention strategy. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2010; 18 (Suppl 1):S23–S26.
                                54. Chamie G, Kwarisiima D, Clark TD, Kabami J, Jain V, Geng E, et al. Leveraging rapid community-based HIV testing campaigns for noncommunicable diseases in rural Uganda. PLoS One 2012; 7:e43400.

                                behavior change communication; health promotion; HIV/AIDS; integration; noncommunicable disease; RE-AIM; sub-Saharan Africa

                                Copyright © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.