Pathways from sexual stigma to incident HIV and sexually transmitted infections among Nigerian MSM : AIDS

Secondary Logo

Journal Logo


Pathways from sexual stigma to incident HIV and sexually transmitted infections among Nigerian MSM

Rodriguez-Hart, Cristinaa,b; Nowak, Rebecca G.a; Musci, Rashelleb; German, Danielleb; Orazulike, Ifeanyic; Kayode, Blessinga; Liu, Hongjied; Gureje, Oyee; Crowell, Trevor A.f,g; Baral, Stefanh; Charurat, Mana for the TRUST/RV368 Study Group

Author Information
doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001637
  • Free



Sexual stigma is the cooccurrence of the following four components within a power imbalance: labeling, stereotyping, separation, and status loss and discrimination specific to sexual minorities because of same-sex practices [1]. Although sexual stigma has been found to be associated with HIV prevalence and with avoidance of seeking health care [2,3], it remains unknown whether sexual stigma drives onward transmission of HIV and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among Nigerian MSM. Psychological processes resulting from sexual stigma may maintain or exacerbate poor mental health, ultimately influencing behaviors that put MSM at risk of new infections [4–6]. Understanding the mental health processes in these pathways may allow an intervention point to prevent further transmission.

A number of studies have shown a direct relationship between sexual stigma and suicidal ideation [4–7] and there is growing evidence that suicidal ideation is a significant problem for MSM across Sub-Saharan Africa [8–10]. Suicidal ideation is often associated with cognitive processes including hopelessness, pessimism, negative self-perceptions, and poor problem-solving skills that may hinder protective health behavior [11,12].

Sexual stigma has also been found to be associated with condomless sex among MSM across a variety of settings outside of Nigeria [13–16]. This relationship may be mediated by psychological processes that include distress, anxiety, depressive symptoms, and suicidality [4,15,17]. Individuals experiencing poor mental health as a result of sexual stigma may use condoms less frequently because of lowered self-esteem [18,19], feelings of hopelessness, or fatalism [20,21], a need for validation or emotional contact [22,23], and sexual sensation seeking [18]. Each of these may become barriers to the development of positive attitudes and intentions that foster protective behavior.

Very few studies have linked sexual stigma to HIV/STIs by way of both mental health and sexual risk behavior and studies assessing sexual stigma's association with HIV and STIs have used prevalence [24–26]. Studies assessing mental health as a mediator of the stigma-HIV/STI association have not assessed suicidal ideation as an indicator of mental health. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to assess: if sexual stigma toward Nigerian MSM is associated with incident HIV/STI infection and if the sexual stigma HIV/STI acquisition association is mediated by suicidal ideation and condomless sex.


Study design

The Network-Based Recruitment of MSM into HCT, Care, Treatment and Prevention Services at Trusted Community-based Venues (TRUST/RV368) study utilizes respondent-driven sampling to recruit MSM into a prospective cohort at two sites in Nigeria as previously described [27,28]. Eligibility criteria included male sex assigned at birth and at least 16 years of age in Abuja or 18 years in Lagos. All participants provide written informed consent and approval for the study was obtained by the Federal Capital Territory Health Research Ethics Committee, the University of Maryland Baltimore Institutional Review Board, and the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research Institutional Review Board.

From March 2013 to February 2016, 1480 participants completed a baseline questionnaire and were provided with HIV testing and counselling using a parallel algorithm of Determine (Alere, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) and Uni-gold (Trinity Biotech, County Wicklow, Ireland), with STAT-PAK (Chembio, New York, New York, USA) as the tiebreaker, upon enrollment and every 3 months thereafter. Urine and rectal swab specimens were tested for Chlamydia tachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoea using the Aptima Combo 2 assay (Hologic, Bedford, Massachusetts, USA) every 3 months. Incident infections were defined by a first positive diagnosis after a previously negative diagnosis. The proportion of individuals with an incident HIV and/or STI infection were pooled as a composite measure for the outcome variable. Variables other than HIV and STIs included in the analysis were assessed only at study enrollment: ever experienced sexual stigma, ever disclosed same-sex practices to family, ever experienced suicidal ideation, condomless sex with casual sex partners in the past 12 months (versus inconsistent condom use or no sexual acts with casual sex partners). Analyses were conducted using STATA Version 13 (Statacorp, College Station, Texas, USA) and MPlus Version 7.4 [29].


Creation of three stigma subgroups

Nine sexual stigma indicators were chosen that are representative of stigma prevalent in the United States, Western Africa, and Southern Africa [30], and were utilized to create three latent stigma classes using latent class analysis. The nine questions asking about stigma as a result of having sex with men included: family made discriminatory remarks, rejection from friends, refusal from police to protect them, verbal harassment, blackmail, physical violence, rape, fear of seeking health care, and fear of walking in public. The analyses were conducted using modal class [31]. Thus, the latent stigma class variable was converted into a manifest variable with three categories of low (n = 633), medium (n = 663), and high (n = 184) stigma.

Bivariate associations

Chi-square goodness of fit testing was used to determine if the proportions of the following variables differed by stigma subgroup: disclosure of same-sex practices, suicidal ideation, condomless sex, and incident HIV/STI infection.

Mediation model

Path analysis is a form of structural equation modeling that is recommended when researchers have hypotheses regarding causal associations between measured variables. A strength of this analysis is that it allows the inclusion of multiple mediators and outcomes, testing direct and indirect effects, and assessing model fit [32]. We tested whether a sexual stigma-HIV/STI incidence association was partially mediated by suicidal ideation and condomless sex, adjusting for disclosure of same-sex practices, age, education, having had a female sex partners in the past 12 months, and sex position (insertive, receptive, both). A test of whether a larger model (with the direct association between stigma and HIV/STI acquisition included) was a better fit than a smaller model (without the direct association) was conducted using a robust χ2 model difference test [29]. The path analysis produced standardized probit regression estimates. A positive coefficient means that an increase in the predictor leads to an increase in the predicted probability. A negative coefficient means that an increase in the predictor leads to a decrease in the predicted probability. The model was clustered by city using a sandwich procedure that calculates robust errors [29]. Model fit was assessed using the following standard criteria: χ2 goodness of fit test P value more than 0.05, root mean square error of approximation less than 0.05, comparative fit index more than 0.90, and Tucker-Lewis Index more than 0.90.


The sample consisted of participants who were primarily under 25 years of age (60%), had completed high school or less education (70%), identified their sex as male (82%), had never disclosed their same-sex practices to a family member (83%), engaged in both insertive and receptive anal sex with male partners in the past 12 months (53%), and approximately half had a female sex partner in the past 12 months. Bivariate analysis revealed that increasing sexual stigma was associated with increasing incident HIV and/or STI infections in a dose–response association (low: 10.6%, medium: 14.2%, high 19.0%, P = 0.008; Fig. 1).

Fig. 1:
Direct associations between stigma classes and other variables in the mediation model in a sample of Nigeria MSM.Differences are significant at P value less than 0.05 for all variables except condomless sex. Four participants were missing answers to the question on suicidal ideation and three participants were missing answers to the question on condomless sex with causal sex partners. STI, sexually transmitted infection.

The larger model with a direct relationship between stigma and HIV/STI acquisition in addition to the indirect associations had a better fit than the smaller model (P < 0.001). Figure 2 presents the final path model. The model had good fit across all fit statistics (χ2P = 0.387, root mean square error of approximation = 0.007, comparative fit index = 0.998, and Tucker-Lewis Index = 0.996). There was a significant total effect of stigma on HIV/STI acquisition (standardized estimate 0.159, standard error (SE) 0.047, P-value = 0.001), consisting of a significant direct effect (standardized estimate of direct effect 0.152, SE 0.047, P-value = 0.001) and a significant indirect effect (standardized estimate of indirect effect 0.006, SE 0.001, P-value < 0.001).

Fig. 2:
Path analysis of the association between sexual stigma and incident HIV and/or sexually transmitted infection among a sample of Nigerian MSM: standardized regression estimates and standard errors.Stigma and condomless sex with casual sex partners were also adjusted by several characteristics not depicted in the model but which retained significance at P < 0.05. Stigma was adjusted by: age, education, having female sex partners in the past 12 months, and sex position. Condomless sex with casual sex partners was adjusted by: education, having female sex partners in the past 12 months, and sex position. STI, sexually transmitted infection.


The path analysis model revealed that MSM who were in higher stigma classes at baseline were more likely to contract HIV/STIs over the course of the study, and this was partially explained by stigma's association with suicidal ideation, suicidal ideation's association with condomless sex with casual sex partners, and condomless sex's association with HIV/STI acquisition. The current study extends the literature by assessing newly acquired infections rather than existing infections (i.e. prevalence) and identifies mediating processes that partially help to explain the association between stigma and HIV/STI acquisition. The direct association between stigma and incident HIV/STI infection remained significant in the model, suggesting the existence of other unmeasured factors that need further exploration.

The levels of suicidal ideation found in this sample were much higher for all stigma classes as compared with the prevalence estimates in a nationally representative sample of Nigerian adults (3.2% with a third subsequently attempting suicide) [33]. The proportion reporting suicidal ideation among the low stigma class alone was 5.3 times that of the nationally representative sample. Suicidal ideation is predictive of suicide, one of the leading causes of death worldwide [34]. Therefore, our findings highlight the need to incorporate mental health issues of MSM in HIV and STI programming in Nigeria. One option would be to adopt WHO's Mental Health Gap Action Programme intervention, that addresses mental, neurological, and substance use disorders with trauma-informed care approaches, within nonstigmatizing venues that serve MSM [35].

Addressing poor mental health is also important for preventing sexual behavior that increases the risk of HIV and STIs. Hatzenbuehler et al.'s [36] psychological mediation framework posits that sexual stigma causes or exacerbates poor mental health through psychological processes, such as hopelessness. Intervention strategies that counteract psychological processes associated with suicidal ideation could include: improving problem solving skills and appraisal to bolster feelings of control and self-worth [37]; organizing peer support groups that are available to counsel MSM clients to alleviate feelings of social isolation and loneliness [38]; and adapting cognitive behavioral therapy interventions successful in high-income settings at reducing condomless sex among MSM to the Nigerian context [39–42].

There are several limitations with these analyses. The latent class analysis that produced the three stigma classes had moderate entropy, which means that some people may have been misclassified [43]. The analyses could have been strengthened by indicators of internalized stigma and other measures of mental health, such as depressive and anxiety symptoms, but which were not collected in the cohort. Our sample size for incident HIV infection was small, limiting our ability to assess the model for HIV and STI separately. Several variables in the model were asked as lifetime experiences, making the temporal ordering unclear and causality difficult to establish. It is possible that stigma did not precede suicidal ideation or condomless sex for some participants. Lastly, the methodology precluded accounting for variation in observation time for different participants and for potential variability in the model variables following enrollment.

Rarely have studies included robust measures of new infections collected from an MSM cohort and explicated a pathway by which to understand how sexual stigma may promote onward transmission of HIV/STIs. These findings call for a meaningful integration of stigma mitigation strategies, mental health services, and psychosocial support as a standard of care, as well as including resiliency-based strategies to build self-efficacy. Together these strategies will minimize deficits in problem-solving skills and overcome feelings of hopelessness among Nigerian MSM.


We are grateful to the individuals who participated in this study, despite the sexual stigma they have experienced, as well as to the study staff who have remained dedicated to the mission of TRUST/RV368 throughout.

M.C., S.B., and I.O. designed the study. R.G.N. and B.K. collected and managed data. C.R-H., R.G.N., M.C. and D.G. conceived the analyses. C.R-H. analyzed data with input from R.M., R.G.N., D.G., M.C., and S.B. C.R-H., D.G., R.G.N., S.B., and M.C. drafted the manuscript and R.M., T.A.C., H.L., and O.G. provided critical review and editing. All authors have seen and approved the article.

The TRUST/RV368 Study Group is constituted as follows: Principal investigator: Man Charurat (IHV, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA).

Co-investigators: Alash’le Abimiku, Sylvia Adebajo, Julie Ake, Senate Amusu, S.B., T.A.C., Charlotte Gaydos, H.L., Jennifer Malia, Nelson Michael, R.G.N, Helen Omuh, I.O., Sheila Peel, Merlin Robb, C.R-H., Sheree Schwartz.

The work was supported by a cooperative agreement (W81XWH-11-2-0174) between the Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., and the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD). This study is also supported by funds from the US National Institutes of Health under Award No. R01MH099001 and R01AI120913 and training grant T32 A1050056-12, the US Military HIV Research Program (Grant No. W81XWH-07-2-0067), Fogarty AITRP (D43TW01041), and the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief through cooperative agreement U2G IPS000651 from the HHS/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Global AIDS Program with IHVN.

The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be construed to represent the positions of the U.S. Army or the Department of Defense or the Department of Health and Human Services.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.


1. Link BG, Phelan JC. Conceptualizing stigma. Annu Rev Sociol 2001; 27:363–385.
2. Adebajo SB, Eluwa GI, Allman D, Myers T, Ahonsi BA. Prevalence of internalized homophobia and HIV associated risks among men who have sex with men in Nigeria. Afr J Reprod Health 2012; 16:21–28.
3. Schwartz S, Nowak R, Orazulike I, Keshinro B, Ake J, Kennedy S, et al. TRUST Study Group. The immediate effect of the same-sex marriage prohibition act on stigma, discrimination, and engagement on HIV prevention and treatment services in men who have sex with men in Nigeria: analysis of prospective data from the TRUST cohort. Lancet HIV 2015; 2:e299–e306.
4. Lea T, de Wit J, Reynolds R. Minority stress in lesbian, gay, and bisexual young adults in Australia: associations with psychological distress, suicidality, and substance use. Arch Sex Behav 2014; 43:1571–1578.
5. Hatzenbuehler ML, Bellatorre A, Lee Y, Finch BK, Muennig P, Fiscella K. Structural stigma and all-cause mortality in sexual minority populations. Soc Sci Med 2014; 103:33–41.
6. Chen H, Li Y, Wang L, Zhang B. Causes of suicidal behaviors in men who have sex with men in China: a national questionnaire survey. BMC Public Health 2015; 15:91.
7. Díaz RM, Ayala G, Bein E. Sexual risk as an outcome of social oppression: data from a probability sample of Latino gay men in three U.S. cities. Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol 2004; 10:255–267.
8. Stoloff K, Joska JA, Feast D, De Swardt G, Hugo J, Struthers H, et al. A description of common mental disorders in men who have sex with men (MSM) referred for assessment and intervention at an MSM clinic in Cape Town, South Africa. AIDS Behav 2013; 17:S77–S81.
9. Risher K, Adams D, Sithole B, Ketende S, Kennedy C, Mnisi Z, et al. Sexual stigma and discrimination as barriers to seeking appropriate healthcare among men who have sex with men in Swaziland. J Int AIDS Soc 2013; 16:18175.
10. Hladik W, Sande E, Berry M, Ganafa S, Kiyingi H, Kusiima J, Hakim A. Men who have sex with men in Kampala, Uganda: results from a bio-behavioral respondent driven sampling survey. AIDS Behav 2017; 21:1478–1490.
11. Dieserud G, Røysamb E, Ekeberg O, Kraft P. Toward an integrative model of suicide attempt: a cognitive psychological approach. Suicide Life Threat Behav 2001; 31:153–168.
12. Beck AT, Steer RA, Beck JS, Newman CF. Hopelessness, depression, suicidal ideation, and clinical diagnosis of depression. Suicide Life Threat Behav 1993; 23:139–145.
13. Choi KH, Hudes ES, Steward WT. Social discrimination, concurrent sexual partnerships, and HIV risk among men who have sex with men in Shanghai, China. AIDS Behav 2008; 12:S71–S77.
14. Ross MW, Berg RC, Schmidt AJ, Hospers HJ, Breveglieri M, Furegato M, et al. European MSM Internet Survey (EMIS) Network. Internalised homonegativity predicts HIV-associated risk behavior in European men who have sex with men in a 38-country cross-sectional study: some public health implications of homophobia. BMJ Open 2013; 3:e001928.
15. Ha H, Risser JM, Ross MW, Huynh NT, Nguyen HT. Homosexuality-related stigma and sexual risk behaviors among men who have sex with men in Hanoi, Vietnam. Arch Sex Behav 2015; 44:349–356.
16. Crosby RA, Salazar LF, Mena L, Geter A. Associations between internalized homophobia and sexual risk behaviors among young black men who have sex with men. Sex Transm Dis 2016; 43:656–660.
17. Tucker A, Liht J, de Swardt G, Jobson G, Rebe K, McIntyre J, Struthers H. Homophobic stigma, depression, self-efficacy and unprotected anal intercourse for peri-urban township men who have sex with men in Cape Town, South Africa: a cross-sectional association model. AIDS Care 2014; 26:882–889.
18. Preston DB, D’Augelli AR, Kassab CD, Starks MT. The relationship of stigma to the sexual risk behavior of rural men who have sex with men. AIDS Educ Prev 2007; 19:218–230.
19. Khan SI, Hussain MI, Gourab G, Parveen S, Bhuiyan MI, Sikder J. Not to stigmatize but to humanize sexual lives of the transgender (hijra) in Bangladesh: condom chat in the AIDS era. J LGBT Heal Res 2008; 4:127–141.
20. Hatzenbuehler ML. How does sexual minority stigma ‘get under the skin’? A psychological mediation framework. Psychol Bull 2009; 135:707–730.
21. Canin L, Dolcini M, Adler NE. Barriers to and facilitators of HIV-STD behavior change: intrapersonal and relationship-based factors. Rev Gen Psychol 1999; 3:338–371.
22. Mereish EH, Poteat VP. A relational model of sexual minority mental and physical health: The negative effects of shame on relationships, loneliness, and health. J Couns Psychol 2015; 62:425–437.
23. Bancroft J, Janssen E, Strong D, Carnes L, Vukadinovic Z, Long JS. Sexual risk-taking in gay men: the relevance of sexual arousability, mood, and sensation seeking. Arch Sex Behav 2003; 32:555–572.
24. Stahlman S, Grosso A, Ketende S, Sweitzer S, Mothopeng T, Taruberekera N, et al. Depression and social stigma among MSM in Lesotho: implications for HIV and sexually transmitted infection prevention. AIDS Behav 2015; 19:1460–1469.
25. Stahlman S, Liestman B, Ketende S, Kouanda S, Ky-zerbo O, Lougue M, et al. Characterizing the HIV risks and potential pathways, to HIV infection among transgender women in Cote d’Ivoire Togo and Burkina Faso. J Int AIDS Soc 2016; 19:20774.
26. Wheeler J, Anfinson K, Valvert D, Lungo S. Is violence associated with increased risk behavior among MSM? Evidence from a population-based survey conducted across nine cities in Central America. Glob Health Action 2014; 7:24814.
27. Charurat M, Emmanuel B, Akolo C, Keshinro B, Nowak RG, Kennedy S, et al. TRUST Study Group. Uptake of treatment as prevention and continuum of care among HIV-positive men who have sex with men in Nigeria. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2015; 68:S114–S123.
28. Baral SD, Ketende S, Schwartz S, Orazulike I, Ugoh K, Peel SA, et al. Evaluating respondent-driven sampling as an implementation tool for universal coverage of antiretroviral studies among men who have sex with men living with HIV. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2015; 68:S107–S113.
29. Muthen LK, Muthen B. Mplus User's Guide. Seventh Edition. 2015. [Accessed 1 May 2017]
30. Stahlman S, Sanchez TH, Sullivan PS, Ketende S, Lyons C, Charurat ME, et al. The prevalence of sexual behavior stigma affecting gay men and other men who have sex with men across Sub-Saharan Africa and in the United States. JMIR Public Health Surveill 2016; 2:e35.
31. Goodman LA. On the assignment of individuals to classes. Sociol Methodol 2007; 37:1–22.
32. Lleras C. Kempf-Leonard K. Path analysis. Academic Press, Encyclopedia of social measurement. New York: 2005.
33. Gureje O, Kola L, Uwakwe R, Udofia O, Wakil A, Afolabi E. The profile and risks of suicidal behaviours in the Nigerian survey of mental health and well-being. Psychol Med 2007; 37:821–830.
34. World Health Organization. Preventing suicide: a global imperative. 2014; Geneva: World Health Organization, http://
35. World Health Organization. mhGAP Intervention Guide: for mental, neurological and substance use disorders in nonspecialized health settings. 2016; Geneva: World Health Organization,
36. Hatzenbuehler ML, Nolen-Hoeksema S, Dovidio J. How does stigma ‘get under the skin’?: the mediating role of emotion regulation. Psychol Sci 2009; 20:1282–1289.
37. Dixon WA, Heppner PP, Rudd MD, Anderson WP. Problem-solving appraisal, hopelessness, and suicide ideation: evidence for a mediational model. J Couns Psychol 1994; 41:91–98.
38. Betron M. Screening for violence against MSM and transgenders: report on a pilot project in Mexico and Thailand. 2009; Washington: USAID, http://
39. McKeon R. Suicidal behaviors. Cambridge: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers; 2008.
40. Murray LK, Skavenski S, Kane JC, Mayeya J, Dorsey S, Cohen JA, et al. Effectiveness of trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy among trauma-affected children in Lusaka, Zambia: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatr 2015; 169:761–769.
41. Herbst JH, Raiford JL, Carry MG, Wilkes AL, Ellington RD, Whittier DK. Adaptation and national dissemination of a brief, evidence-based, HIV prevention intervention for high-risk men who have sex with men. MMWR Suppl 2016; 65:42–50.
42. Lelutiu-Weinberger C, Pachankis JE, Gamarel KE, Surace A, Golub SA, Parsons JT. Feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a live-chat social media intervention to reduce HIV risk among young men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav 2015; 19:1214–1227.
43. Collins LM, Lanza ST. Latent class analysis and latent transition analysis. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2010.

HIV infections; incidence; MSM; path analysis; sexually transmitted infections; stigma

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.