Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Frailty is strongly associated with increased risk of recurrent falls among older HIV-infected adults

Tassiopoulos, Katherinea; Abdo, Monab; Wu, Kunlingb; Koletar, Susan L.c; Palella, Frank J. Jrd; Kalayjian, Roberte; Taiwo, Babafemid; Erlandson, Kristine M.f

doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001613
Epidemiology and Social
Free

Objective: Both frailty and falls occur at earlier-than-expected ages among HIV-infected individuals, but the contribution of frailty-to-fall risk in this population is not well understood. We examined this association among participants enrolled in AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) A5322.

Design: A prospective, multicenter cohort study of HIV-infected men and women aged at least 40 years.

Methods: Frailty assessment included a 4-m walk, grip strength, and self-reported weight loss, exhaustion, and low physical activity. Multinomial logistic regression assessed the association between baseline frailty, grip, and 4-m walk, and single and recurrent (2+) falls over the next 12 months; logistic regression assessed effect modification by several factors on association between frailty and any (1+) falls.

Results: Of 967 individuals, 6% were frail, 39% prefrail, and 55% nonfrail. Eighteen percent had at least one fall, and 7% had recurrent falls. In multivariable models, recurrent falls were more likely among frail (odds ratio 17.3, 95% confidence interval 7.03–42.6) and prefrail (odds ratio 3.80, 95% CI 1.87–7.72) than nonfrail individuals. Significant associations were also seen with recurrent falls and slow walk and weak grip. The association between frailty and any falls was substantially stronger among individuals with peripheral neuropathy.

Conclusion: Aging HIV-infected prefrail and frail individuals are at significantly increased risk of falls. Incorporation of frailty assessments or simple evaluations of walk speed or grip strength in clinical care may help identify individuals at greatest risk for falls. Peripheral neuropathy further increases fall risk among frail persons, defining a potential target population for closer fall surveillance, prevention, and treatment.

aHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology

bHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Center for Biostatistics in AIDS Research, Boston, Massachusetts

cOhio State University, Department of Internal Medicine; Columbus, Ohio

dNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Department of Medicine; Chicago, Illinois

eMetroHealth and Louis Stokes Cleveland Veterans Administration Medical Center, Department of Medicine; Cleveland, Ohio

fUniversity of Colorado-Anschutz Medical Campus, Department of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

Correspondence to Katherine Tassiopoulos, DSc, MPH, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, 677 Huntington Ave., Kresge 817B, Boston, MA 02115, USA. Tel: +1 617 432 3265; e-mail: ktassiop@hsph.harvard.edu

Received 12 June, 2017

Revised 25 July, 2017

Accepted 28 July, 2017

Back to Top | Article Outline

Introduction

Falls are a significant risk factor for health-related complications and mortality in older adults, and are associated with a substantial healthcare burden and cost [1]. The likelihood of injuries resulting from falls increases with age; these injuries can exacerbate already existing problems of physical inactivity and weakness [2]. The prevalence of both frailty and falls increase with age, and the association between these two common age-associated morbidities has been extensively documented in community-dwelling and institutionalized populations [3,4]. Among middle-aged and older HIV-infected individuals, including those with well suppressed infection, frailty, and impairments in physical function are common [5–8], and one study found that the prevalence of falls among middle-aged HIV-infected adults with a mean age of 52 years paralleled that of HIV-uninfected adults 65 years or older [9]. Whereas the number of older HIV-infected adults in the United States continues to rise because of enhanced survival and life expectancy, research into risk factors for falls in HIV-infected individuals remains limited [10–12]. Only one study to date has considered the association between frailty and falls; frailty was found to be strongly associated with recurrent (two or more) falls in the prior 12 months in a cross-sectional analysis of 359 HIV-infected men and women 45 to 65 years of age, with exhaustion being the frailty component with the strongest association [9].

The AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) A5322 study is a prospective observational study of 1035 HIV-infected adults 40 years of age and older. In this analysis, our specific aims were to determine the proportion of A5322 participants who experienced falls over a 12-month period, overall and by frailty status; to summarize the number and proportion of falls resulting in medical treatment or a bone fracture; to examine the association between frailty status and incidence of single and recurrent falls; and to assess several factors (sex, age, comorbidities, peripheral neuropathy, and neurocognitive impairment) as potential effect modifiers of the association between frailty and any falls.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Methods

Participants

The ACTG A5322 study examines long-term health outcomes of older HIV-infected men and women. All participants received their initial antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimen through an ACTG clinical trial and were previously followed long-term after their trial participation in another ACTG observational study – A5001 [13]. A5322 participants were enrolled at one of 32 clinical research sites in the United States, including Puerto Rico, between November 2013 and July 2014. Ongoing visits every 6 months include medical chart abstraction, targeted physical examinations, fasting laboratory tests, repository biological specimen collection, interviews and self-administered questionnaires for collection of behavioral information, and evaluations of frailty, neurocognitive function, and instrumental activities of daily living. All participants signed a written informed consent before enrollment, and A5322 study has been approved by local institutional review boards at each site.

The current analysis is a prospective evaluation of the association between baseline (A5322 entry) frailty and self-reported falls occurring over the subsequent two study visits (6 and 12 months). All A5322 participants who underwent a complete frailty evaluation at baseline and had information available regarding falls over one or both of the two subsequent study visits were included in this analysis.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Outcome

Falls are assessed at every visit, beginning with the 6-month visit, using self-reported responses obtained through interview-administered questionnaires. During the interview, participants are instructed that a fall is defined as an unexpected event in which an individual loses balance and lands on the floor, ground, or a lower level, or hits an object. Events resulting from a major medical event such as a stroke or an overwhelming external hazard such as being pushed are not considered falls. Participants are asked about occurrence of falls (1, 2, 3–5, >5) in the past 6 months. For participants who report a fall, the need for medical attention and the occurrence of bone fracture are also reported. In this analysis, the number of falls was calculated across both time points for participants who completed both the 6 and 12-month falls interview. For persons who completed only one interview, the total number of falls reported at that visit was included. Participants with missing information regarding falls at either 6 or 12 months were assumed to not have had any falls during the relevant time period.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Exposure

In A5322, frailty is assessed using a modified version of the Fried's frailty assessment [14], as previously described [15], which consists of five components: grip strength (the average of three grip assessments using a dynamometer), gait speed (4-m timed walk), and self-reported unintentional weight loss (≥10 lbs over the prior year), exhaustion, and limitations in vigorous physical activities. In this analysis, the baseline frailty assessment was used. Participants were categorized as frail (3–5 components), prefrail (1 or 2 components), or nonfrail (no components). The individual frailty components of gait speed (≤1 m/s vs. >1 m/s) and grip strength (cut-offs for weak grip strength based on sex and BMI) were also examined as exposures [14].

Back to Top | Article Outline

Confounders

Potential confounders of the association between frailty and falls were identified based on previous literature [16–18]. We evaluated these variables using a directed acyclic graph (DAG) [19] to identify a minimally sufficient list of variables to include in the multivariable models. Each potential confounder was added one at a time to the univariable model, and any variable that changed the coefficient (log odds) for any category of the effect of the frailty measure (3-category frailty, grip strength, or gait speed) on falls by a least 15% was kept in the multivariable model. The baseline variables considered as potential confounders were: age (continuous; 40–49, 50–59, 60+ years); sex; race/ethnicity (white non-Hispanic, black non-Hispanic, Hispanic/other); education (<high school, high school, >high school); medical insurance (no coverage, Medicare/Medicaid, private insurance/other); BMI (underweight (<18.5 kg/m2), normal weight (18.5–<25 kg/m2), overweight (25–30 kg/m2), obese (>30 kg/m2); waist circumference cut-off (men >102 cm, women >88 cm); use of antihypertensive medication; use of antidepressant/anxiolytic medication; comorbidities established via chart abstraction [diabetes mellitus, hypertension, kidney disease, liver disease, cardiovascular disease, stroke, chronic hepatitis C virus infection (positive antibody), cancer (within past 5 years)]; recreational substance use (marijuana, cocaine, heroin, amphetamines, other nonprescribed drugs); alcohol use (heavy/binge, moderate, light or none); cigarette smoking (current/prior/never); peripheral neuropathy (absent or hypoactive ankle reflexes bilaterally or mild, moderate, or severe loss in vibration perception bilaterally) [20]; any history of didanosine, stavudine, or zalcitabine use; physical activity (≥3 or more days in past 7 of moderate/vigorous activity vs. <3 days); history of AIDS-defining conditions (any/none); and neurocognitive function (continuous; impaired). Neurocognitive function is assessed with the A5001 Neuroscreen [21], which uses normalized, age, sex, and race/ethnicity-adjusted z-scores of the Trail-Making A, Trail-Making B, and Digit Symbol tests. One overall continuous score is obtained from the average of the three z-scores. Impairment is defined as having at least one z-score two standard deviations (SDs) below the mean or at least two z-scores one SD below the mean on two separate tests.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Effect modifiers

A subset of the above variables (sex, age, comorbidities, peripheral neuropathy, neurocognitive impairment) was examined to explore whether the association between the frailty measures and any falls differed between categories of any of these variables.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Statistical analyses

For descriptive analyses and to examine the association between frailty measures and falls, participants were categorized into one of three fall categories: no falls reported over 12 months, single fall, and recurrent falls (≥2). In the effect modification analyses, the outcome was defined as any falls (≥1) versus no falls to avoid the problem of sparse data.

The number and proportion of individuals with falls over the 12-month period after baseline was calculated, overall and by frailty status, and also the proportion of participants who sought medical attention for a fall and the proportion of participants who experienced a fracture as a result of a fall. Participant characteristics by fall group were compared using chi-square tests for categorical variables and Kruskal–Wallis tests for continuous variables.

Associations between the three frailty measures and single and recurrent falls over the 12-month period were assessed using separate multinomial logistic regression models. Multinomial logistic regression was used rather than ordinal logistic regression because the score test statistics were significant for all three ordinal logistic regression models (frailty and falls: χ2 = 18.26, P < 0.0001; gait speed and falls: χ2 = 28.40, P < 0.0001; and grip strength and falls: χ2 = 9.85, P = 0.0017), indicating that the proportional odds assumption of ordinal logistic regression is not met.

To examine potential effect modification by sex, age, comorbidities, neuropathy, and neurocognitive function on the association between frailty and falls, we first reviewed cross-tabulations of frailty and falls stratified by categories of each potential effect modifier. When there was qualitative evidence of effect modification based on the stratified tables, models with an interaction term between the potential effect modifier and the frailty variable (three-category frailty, gait speed, or grip strength) were evaluated [22].

Using sensitivity analyses, we explored the reasonableness of our assumption that individuals with missing falls information at either the 6 or 12-month visit had no falls. In these sensitivity analyses, we repeated model-building for the association between frailty and falls, and for effect modification on frailty and falls, restricted to individuals with falls information at both visits. All analyses were conducted using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USA).

Back to Top | Article Outline

Results

Nine hundred and sixty-seven of the 1035 A5322 participants (93%) had a frailty assessment at baseline and a falls interview at either the 6-month or 12-month visit, and were therefore included in these analyses. Eighty-four percent of individuals completed falls interviews at both visits – 9.1% at the 6-month visit only and 6.5% at 12 months only.

Of the 967 individuals, 174 (18%) had at least one fall over the 12-month period, with 106 (11%) reporting one fall and 68 (7%) recurrent falls. Fifty-nine percent of the recurrent fallers fell three or more times. Twenty-one percent of participants who reported any fall sought medical attention for a fall, and 5% sustained a fracture as a result of the fall. Selected demographic, clinical, and behavioral characteristics, stratified by number of falls (0, 1, and 2+), are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1

Table 1

Overall, 59 participants (6%) were classified as frail, and 373 (39%) as prefrail. Figure 1 shows the proportion of individuals with falls by frailty status. Twelve percent of nonfrail, 22% of prefrail, and 49% of frail individuals had one or more falls.

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

Back to Top | Article Outline

Association between frailty and falls

As shown in Fig. 2, compared to nonfrail participants, recurrent falls were more likely among prefrail [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 3.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.87, 7.72) and frail (aOR 17.3, 95% CI 7.03, 42.6) participants. There was increased odds of single falls among both prefrail (aOR 1.54, 95% CI 0.96, 2.48) and frail participants (aOR 2.36, 95% CI 0.89, 6.28), although these associations did not reach statistical significance. Regarding individual components of the frailty assessment, participants with weak grip strength had a higher odds of recurrent falls than those without weak grip strength (aOR 3.77, 95% CI 2.17, 6.54). Similarly, participants with slow gait speed were more likely than those without slow gait to experience recurrent falls (aOR 2.93, 95% CI 1.59, 5.38). Neither gait speed nor grip strength was associated with single falls.

Fig. 2

Fig. 2

Three hundred and seventy-three participants (38.6%) had peripheral neuropathy. Fifty-five (14.7%) had moderate to severe loss of vibration bilaterally and 278 (74.5%) had absent or hypoactive reflexes bilaterally (35 had both moderate/severe vibration loss and absent/hypoactive reflexes bilaterally). Most of the others had mild loss of vibration bilaterally with normal reflexes. Among individuals with peripheral neuropathy, frail participants were significantly more likely to experience falls (aOR 17.7, 95% CI 6.89, 45.5) than nonfrail individuals, whereas among those without peripheral neuropathy, the association between frailty and falls was weaker and not significant (aOR 2.16, 95% CI 0.76, 6.11; P value for interaction term = 0.003) (Fig. 3). The effect modification of peripheral neuropathy was observed only for frailty and not for prefrailty, grip strength, or gait speed. There was some qualitative evidence of effect modification by sex on the association between frailty and falls, but this interaction was not statistically significant (frail vs. nonfrail: aOR for males 7.82, 95% CI 3.69, 16.6; aOR for females 3.66, 95% CI 0.95, 14.1; P value for interaction = 0.21). There was no evidence of effect modification by age, comorbidities, or neurocognitive impairment on the associations between any of the frailty measures and falls.

Fig. 3

Fig. 3

In the sensitivity analyses restricted to persons with falls information at both the 6 and 12-month visits, our results were essentially the same, with the following exceptions: the OR for frailty and single falls was larger than in the primary analysis and statistically significant (aOR 3.03, 95% CI 1.09, 8.39), and the OR for grip strength and single falls, although similar to that in the primary analysis, did not reach statistical significance (aOR 1.45, 95% CI 0.81, 2.62).

Back to Top | Article Outline

Discussion

We identified a strong association between frailty and recurrent falls in this cohort of older HIV-infected men and women. Frail individuals had substantially higher odds of falling two or more times over the subsequent 12-month period. Also, ours is the first study to report upon an association between prefrailty and falls in HIV-infected adults, although several previous studies of HIV-uninfected individuals have identified this association [4,5,23]. In particular, the two objectively measured components of frailty – weak grip strength and slow 4-m walk – were associated with significantly higher odds of recurrent falls.

The association between frailty and fall occurrence was substantially stronger for recurrent than for single falls. Recurrent fallers and persons who fall less frequently likely comprise very different groups in terms of overall health status. Occasional fallers may be more physically active and their falls more likely due to accidents, whereas recurrent fallers are more likely to have impaired balance and strength, reduced reaction time, and diminished functional reserve capacity [18,24]. The majority of recurrent fallers (59%) in our study reported falling three or more times over the 12-month follow-up period, indicating a relatively high frequency of falls.

The magnitude of the overall association we identified between frailty and falls is substantially greater than previously observed in studies of older HIV-uninfected individuals. In a review and meta-analysis of prospective studies that assessed risk of future falls among community-dwelling individuals 60 years of age and older, the ORs for frailty and recurrent falls ranged from 1.38 to 3.56, and for prefrailty and falls from 0.90 to 1.62 [4]. Our findings are more consistent with those observed in a previous study of HIV-infected individuals [9]. In this study and in ours, the effect sizes were substantially larger, despite the fact that the individuals being evaluated were on average almost 10 years younger. The reason for this difference in effect size is likely multifactorial. One explanation could be that a large proportion of our study population – over 80% – was male. We found that the association between frailty and falls was more pronounced among men than women, although this difference was not statistically significant. The aforementioned meta-analysis of HIV-uninfected older individuals attributed the high heterogeneity of effect sizes between frailty status and falls largely to differences in the proportion of men in these studies, and it was also noted that the association between frailty and falls seemed stronger among men than women [4].

Another potential explanation for the strong association we observed between frailty and falls is that HIV-infected individuals in our cohort have multiple comorbid conditions that may affect their risk of falls through different mechanisms (such as weakness, impaired balance, neuropathy, and polypharmacy). In particular, over a third of our cohort reported peripheral neuropathy. In the previously published analysis of frailty and falls among HIV-infected individuals, a similar proportion (38%) had peripheral neuropathy [9]. Indeed, we found strong evidence for effect modification by peripheral neuropathy on the association between frailty and falls; among individuals with peripheral neuropathy, the association was very strong, whereas among those without peripheral neuropathy, it was more modest and also more in line with effect sizes observed in HIV-uninfected populations. Peripheral neuropathy and frailty can affect fall risk through overlapping yet distinct mechanisms of action, such that their combined effect is larger than the sum of their individual effects. Peripheral neuropathy, manifested in part through sensory loss, has deleterious effects on gait, balance, and postural stability [25]. Frail individuals, who are defined by their limited reserves, lower limb weakness, and diminished ability to respond to stressors, are likely unable to recover quickly after losing their balance. Future studies comparing HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected individuals are needed to confirm the stronger association among HIV-infected individuals between frailty and falls, and to examine reasons for this effect modification.

The protective association of slow walk speed on the incidence of single falls was unexpected. However, in a population-based cohort study of community-dwelling older individuals, those who were classified as normal to slow walkers had a lower overall risk of falling than did individuals classified as fast walkers [26], and may suggest that the former category of individuals have already employed compensatory mechanisms to minimize fall risk.

Among our study's strengths is its large sample size, which allowed us to examine both prefrailty and frailty, individual components of frailty, and effect modification while adjusting for important confounding variables. Ours is the first prospective study to evaluate frailty and falls among HIV-infected individuals. There was a relatively short recall period required for falls, which may have reduced the likelihood of underestimating falls [2]. There are also several limitations to mention. This A5322 cohort of middle-aged and older men and women currently has a relatively small number of frail individuals, and also recurrent fallers, resulting in some imprecise effect estimates. The small number of frail persons studied precluded examination of effect modification on frailty and recurrent falls. We assumed those with missing falls information at a visit experienced no falls, which could have underestimated the incidence of falls in the cohort. Additionally, this cohort is comprised of a group of participants who have a history of long-term voluntary participation in both clinical trials and observational studies, and the results of this study may therefore not be generalizable to all HIV-infected older adults in the United States.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Conclusion

Aging HIV-infected prefrail and frail individuals are at significantly increased risk of falls compared to nonfrail HIV-infected individuals, and this association appears to be stronger than previously observed in HIV-uninfected individuals. Incorporation of frailty assessments or simple evaluations of 4-m walk speed or grip strength in routine clinical care may help identify individuals at greatest risk for falls and, hence, those who would benefit most from falls prevention interventions. Peripheral neuropathy further increases fall risk among frail persons, and this may define a potential target population for closer fall surveillance, prevention, and treatment.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Acknowledgements

Authors’ contributions: K.T. and K.M.E. designed the study. M.A. was the primary statistical analyst, under the supervision of K.T. K.W. also conducted statistical analyses. K.T. wrote the article. All authors contributed to interpretation of results, critically reviewed the article, and approved the final version.

We thank the study volunteers who participated in A5322, all the ACTG clinical units that enroll and follow participants, and the ACTG.

Funding: This work was supported by the following institutes of the National Institutes of Health: the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) [AI068636, AI069432, AI068634, AI069423, AI069452, AI067039, AI106701 (and AI069494 to S.L.K.)], the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), and the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR), and also by the National Institute of Aging (NIA) [K23AG050260; R01AG054366] to K.M.E. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. This research was also supported by the Veterans Administration: VISN10 Geriatric Research Educational and Clinical Centers, Louis Stokes Cleveland Veterans Administration Medical Center and the CWRU Center for AIDS Research P30 AI036219 to R.C.K. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Conflicts of interest

R.C.K. receives grant support from Gilead Sciences, and F.J.P. is a consultant and/or on the speakers bureau for Gilead Sciences, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Merck and Co. and Bristol Myers Squibb. B.T. has received honoraria and/or grant support to Northwestern University from ViiV Healthcare, Gilead Sciences, Glaxo Smith Kline, and Janssen. K.M.E. has received grant support from Gilead Sciences and has served as a consultant for Theratechnologies.

All other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Back to Top | Article Outline

References

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US). Important facts about falls. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/homeandrecreationalsafety/falls/adultfalls.html. [Accessed 12 April 2017]
2. Cummings SR, Nevitt MC, Kidd S. Forgetting falls. The limited accuracy of recall of falls in the elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc 1988; 36:613–616.
3. Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S, Rikkert MO, Rockwood K. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet 2013; 381:752–762.
4. Kojima G. Frailty as a predictor of future falls among community-dwelling older people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2015; 16:1027–1033.
5. Gustafson DR, Shi Q, Thurn M, Holman S, Minkoff H, Cohen M, et al. Frailty and constellations of factors in aging HIV-infected and uninfected Women: the Women's Interagency HIV Study. J Frailty Aging 2016; 5:43–48.
6. Levett TJ, Cresswell FV, Malik MA, Fisher M, Wright J. Systematic review of prevalence and predictors of frailty in individuals with human immunodeficiency virus. J Am Geriatr 2016; 64:1006–1014.
7. Erlandson KM, Schrack JA, Jankowski CM, Brown TT, Campbell TB. Functional impairment, disability, and frailty in adults aging with HIV infection. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep 2014; 11:279–290.
8. Brothers TD, Kirkland S, Guaraldi G, Falutz J, Theou O, Johnston BL, et al. Frailty in people aging with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. J Infect Dis 2014; 210:1170–1179.
9. Erlandson KM, Allshouse AA, Jankowski CM, Duong S, MaWhinney S, Kohrt WM, et al. Risk factors for falls in HIV-infected persons. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2012; 61:484–489.
10. Erlandson KM, Plankey MW, Springer G, Cohen HS, Cox C, Hoffman HJ, et al. Fall frequency and associated factors among men and women with or at risk for HIV infection. HIV Med 2016; 17:740–748.
11. Ruiz MA, Reske T, Cefalu C, Estrada J. Falls in HIV-infected patients: a geriatric syndrome in a susceptible population. J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care 2013; 12:266–269.
12. Sharma A, Hoover DR, Shi Q, Holman S, Plankey MW, Wheeler AL, et al. Falls among middle-aged women in the Women's Interagency HIV Study. Antivir Ther 2016; 21:697–706.
13. Smurzynski M, Collier AC, Koletar SL, Bosch RJ, Wu K, Bastow B, et al. AIDS clinical trials group longitudinal linked randomized trials (ALLRT): rationale, design, and baseline characteristics. HIV Clin Trials 2008; 9:269–282.
14. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2001; 56:M146–156.
15. Erlandson KM, Wu K, Koletar SL, Kalayjian RC, Ellis RJ, Taiwo B, et al. frailty and components of the frailty phenotype are associated with modifiable risk factors and antiretroviral therapy. J Infect Dis 2017; 15:933–937.
16. Masud T, Morris RO. Epidemiology of falls. Age Ageing 2001; 30 (suppl 4):3–7.
17. Rubenstein LZ. Falls in older people: epidemiology, risk factors and strategies for prevention. Age Ageing 2006; 35 (suppl 2):ii37–ii41.
18. Deandrea S, Lucenteforte E, Bravi F, Foschi R, La Vecchia C, Negri E. Risk factors for falls in community-dwelling older people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Epidemiology 2010; 21:658–668.
19. Greenland S, Pearl J, Robins JM. Causal diagrams for epidemiologic research. Epidemiology 1999; 10:37–48.
20. Evans SR, Ellis RJ, Chen H, Yeh TM, Lee AJ, Schifitto G, et al. Peripheral neuropathy in HIV: prevalence and risk factors. AIDS 2011; 25:919–928.
21. Ellis RJ, Evans SR, Clifford DB, Moo LR, McArthur JC, Collier AC, et al. Clinical validation of the NeuroScreen. J Neurovirol 2005; 11:503–511.
22. Rothman KJ, Greenland S. Modern epidemiology. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven Publishers; 1998.
23. Samper-Ternent R, Karmarkar A, Graham J, Reistetter T, Ottenbacher K. Frailty as a predictor of falls in older Mexican Americans. J Aging Health 2012; 24:641–653.
24. Lord SR, Ward JA, Williams P, Anstey KJ. Physiological factors associated with falls in older community-dwelling women. J Am Geriatr 1994; 42:1110–1117.
25. Pan X, Bai J-j. Balance training in the intervention of fall risk in elderly with diabetic peripheral neuropathy: A review. Int J Nursing Sci 2014; 1:441–445.
26. Quach L, Galica AM, Jones RN, Procter-Gray E, Manor B, Hannan MT, et al. The nonlinear relationship between gait speed and falls: the Maintenance of Balance, Independent Living, Intellect, and Zest in the Elderly of Boston Study. J Am Geriatr 2011; 59:1069–1073.
Keywords:

aging; falls; frailty; HIV-infected; peripheral neuropathy

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.