Secondary Logo

Share this article on:

Neurocognition and quality of life after reinitiating antiretroviral therapy in children randomized to planned treatment interruption

Ananworanich, Jintanat; Melvin, Diane; Amador, Jose T.R.; Childs, Tristan; Medin, Gabriela; Boscolo, Valentina; Compagnucci, Alexandra; Kanjanavanit, Suparat; Montero, Samuel; Gibb, Diana M.on behalf of the PENTA 11 Study Group

doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001011

Objective: Understanding the effects of antiretroviral treatment (ART) interruption on neurocognition and quality of life (QoL) are important for managing unplanned interruptions and planned interruptions in HIV cure research.

Design: Children previously randomized to continuous (continuous ART, n = 41) vs. planned treatment interruption (PTI, n = 47) in the Pediatric European Network for Treatment of AIDS (PENTA) 11 study were enrolled. At study end, PTI children resumed ART. At 1 and 2 years following study end, children were assessed by the coding, symbol search and digit span subtests of Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (6–16 years old) or Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (≥17 years old) and by Pediatrics QoL questionnaires for physical and psychological QoL. Transformed scaled scores for neurocognition and mean standardized scores for QoL were compared between arms by t-test and Mann–Whitney U test, respectively. Scores indicating clinical concern were compared (<7 for neurocognition and <70 for QoL tests).

Results: Characteristics were similar between arms with a median age of 12.6 years, CD4+ of 830 cells/μl and HIV RNA of 1.7 log10copies/ml. The median cumulative ART exposure was 9.6 in continuous ART vs. 7.7 years in PTI (P = 0.02). PTI children had a median of 12 months off ART and had resumed ART for 25.2 months at time of first assessment. Neurocognitive scores were similar between arms for all tests. Physical and psychological QoL scores were no different. About 40% had low neurocognitive and QoL scores indicating clinical concern.

Conclusion: No differences in information processing speed, sustained attention, short-term memory and QoL functioning were observed between children previously randomized to continuous ART vs. PTI in the PENTA 11 trial.

aThe HIV Netherlands Australia Thailand Research Collaboration, The Thai Red Cross AIDS Research Center, Bangkok, Thailand

bImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

cHospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain

dMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK

eClinica Pediatrica, University of Padova, Padova, Italy

fInserm-ANRS SC10-US19, Villejuif, France

gNakornping Hospital, Chiang Mai, Thailand

*Present address: U.S. Military HIV Research Program, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement, of Military Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

Present address: Public Health England, London, USA.

Correspondence to Jintanat Ananworanich, U.S. Military HIV Research Program, 6720A Rockledge Drive, Suite 400, Bethesda, Maryland, 20817, USA. E-mail:

Received 8 April, 2015

Revised 8 December, 2015

Accepted 16 December, 2015

Back to Top | Article Outline


Severe forms of HIV-associated brain insult or HIV encephalopathy have fortunately become less common since the widespread use of antiretroviral therapy (ART). However, milder but static forms of neurocognitive impairment (NCI) afflict up to half of children living with HIV [1–3], and may compromise their successful transition into adulthood. Advanced HIV disease and unsuppressed HIV viremia are predictors of poor neurocognition as well as quality of life (QoL) [4–6]. Therefore, ART interruption may negatively impact these factors.

Here we capitalize on the unique opportunity to assess neurocognition and QoL in children who were randomized to continuous ART vs. CD4+-guided planned treatment interruption (PTI) in the Pediatric European Network for Treatment of AIDS (PENTA) 11 trial [7]. At the end of the trial, PTI children were advised to reinitiate ART and after 2 years of ART resumption, similar clinical, immunological, and virological outcomes were observed between arms [8]. However, neurocognition and QoL have not yet been compared. As the Strategies for Management of Antiretroviral Therapy study in adults showed excessive risks for adverse outcomes with PTI even after ART was reinitiated [9], we conducted this substudy to compare neurocognition and QoL at 1 and 2 years following the end of the PENTA 11 study. Although PTI is not a recommended treatment strategy, this study is relevant to the treatment of HIV-infected children because unplanned ART interruption is not infrequent, particularly in adolescents [10], and treatment interruption may be a critical component of future HIV cure research [11]. Understanding the effects of ART interruption on neurocognition and QoL could inform monitoring and intervention of these children.

Back to Top | Article Outline


This is a substudy of the PENTA 11 trial (ISRCTN36694210) in which virally suppressed HIV-infected children were randomized to either 72 weeks of continuous ART vs. PTI as previously described [7]. At trial end in May 2008, ART was reinitiated in PTI children and routine HIV care data were collected in both arms for 5 years as part of the long-term cohort study [8]. In addition, children were offered enrollment in this substudy with annual neurocognitive and QoL assessments; here we include data from years 1 and 2. The neurocognitive measures were three subscales (coding, symbol search, and digit span) from either the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC IV for those aged 6 to <17 years old) or the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS IV for those aged ≥17 years old). Scaled scores rather than raw scores are reported as these are corrected for age and are comparable for the WISC and WAIS scales. The coding and symbol search subscales assess speed of information processing and sustained attention, whereas digit span assesses short-term memory. These tests were selected because they evaluate cognitive domains that have been reported as most vulnerable to the effects of HIV (short-term memory, attention, and processing speed) and they depend less on verbal or language comprehension, therefore, maximizing data fidelity across ethnic and language contexts. Additionally, participating sites had experience administering these tests.

Children and carers were also separately asked to complete Pediatrics Quality of Life (PedsQL) questionnaires [12]. These scales contain 23 items about physical, emotional, social, and school functions. There are age appropriate versions from 5 to more than 18 years old. All items were rated on a 5-point rating scale and scores were then standardized on 100-point scale in which higher scores reflected better QoL. Carers gave their consent and consent/assent was obtained from children according to local practices. The study was approved by Ethics Committees for all participating sites.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Data Analysis

The neurocognitive raw scores were transformed into normative scaled scores; means on each scale were computed and the number of children with a scaled score below seven was obtained. This cutoff represents scores significantly below the test mean compared with others of the same age. On the PedsQL, overall mean scores for physical and psychosocial functions were computed, as were scores of 70 or less on any scale. This cutoff has been used to indicate clinical concern [13].

Differences between mean continuous ART and PTI arm scores were tested for each neurocognitive test and QoL assessment score, using an independent samples t-test and Mann–Whitney U test, respectively. This outcome was analyzed using exact logistic regression to test for differences between the two arms, with the analysis adjusted for sex, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) class C status, nadir CD4%, and continent. An identical sensitivity analysis was also performed by excluding children with HIV encephalopathy.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Of 101 children (51 continuous ART and 50 PTI) from the PENTA 11 trial who were eligible for inclusion, 88 children from seven countries participated in this substudy (41 continuous ART and 47 PTI). Table 1 shows the characteristics of the children at time of their first assessment 1 year after the main trial ended. Both the continuous ART and PTI groups were similar in age, sex, ethnicity, and HIV-related factors except that there tended to be more CDC grade C illnesses in the continuous ART arm (P = 0.05) and CD4% was slightly lower in PTI arm although very similar at 2 years [8]. Two continuous ART children had HIV encephalopathy but none in the PTI arm. The cumulative time on ART was longer in the continuous ART arm. The PTI children had about 1 year of ART interruption and had been back on ART for about 2 years at the time of their first neurocognitive and QoL assessment.

Table 1

Table 1

Table 2 shows the neurocognitive and PedsQL outcomes. The mean scaled scores and the proportion with low scaled scores for all three neurocognitive tasks were not significantly different between arms for both years 1 and 2. In year 1, 38% had scaled score below seven on at least one test, with low scores observed in 18% for symbol search, 20% for coding, and 20% for digit span. In year 2, the scaled scores and proportion of children with low scores were similar between arms. There were no significant changes between year 1 and 2 for all neurocognitive subscales except for a trend toward fewer children having low scores in year 2 for symbol search and digit span.

Table 2

Table 2

The mean scores on the physical or psychological scales of the PedsQL were similar for those in the continuous ART and PT arms for the carer reports for years 1 and 2; physical but not psychological scores for the child were lower in the PTI arm in year 2 only (Table 2). The proportions of children with low scores, that is, less than 70, on either the physical or the psychological scale were not different between arms. Combining the two arms found the percentage of all children scoring less than 70 in year 1 to be 14% for the physical scale and 28% for the psychosocial scale; results were similar in year 2 (Table 2). Carers reported a higher level of concern in most areas than the children. The neurocognitive and QoL outcomes did not change when children with HIV encephalopathy were excluded.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Although continuous ART is the standard of care, adherence to ART is not easy and clinicians are faced with managing unplanned ART interruptions in children and teenagers [10,14]. The randomized PENTA 11 study offers a unique opportunity to evaluate if ART interruption guided by CD4+ had adverse neurocognitive and QoL consequences. Here we demonstrated that children who had interrupted ART for about a year and subsequently resumed ART for an average of 2 years performed similarly on information processing speed, sustained attention and short-term memory compared with those who had not interrupted therapy. Almost 40% had scores below those of healthy children, illustrating the chronic stable NCI that continues to be prevalent in children living with HIV [1,3]. QoL scores were also similar between randomized arms but approximately one-third of children had scores in the range that indicate clinical concern.

HIV affects the brain directly by infecting resident macrophages and astrocytes, and indirectly, by triggering inflammatory responses – both processes could be more pronounced in the immature brain [15,16]. HIV proteins such as gp120, Tat, Nef, and Vpr can also be neurotoxic by causing neuronal cell death when released from HIV-infected cells, possibly leading to functional impairment [17]. Consequently, the magnitude and duration of HIV viremia predicts NCI [18] leading to our concern of adverse consequences in the interrupted arm of this study. No studies have investigated the effects of ART interruption on neurocognition and QoL but inferences could be drawn from those that evaluate timing of ART on these factors. The Pediatric Randomized to Early versus Deferred Initiation in Cambodia and Thailand study randomized children who were about 6 years old to initiating ART at CD4+ 15–24% vs. deferring until CD4+ less than 15% and did not find differences in intelligent quotients and psychomotor performance nor QoL scores after 3 years [19,20]. However, the Children with HIV Early Antiretroviral Therapy study observed poorer neurocognitive outcomes in infants who were randomized to defer ART until CD4+ ∼25% vs. those who initiated before 3 months of age [21]. These data suggest that brain insult from HIV likely occurs early during infancy [22,23]; therefore, delayed ART or ART interruption might not have an apparent effect on brain functioning in older children. A consistent finding across studies remains that a significant proportion of children with HIV perform poorer on neurocognitive and QoL tests [4–6]. The impaired information processing, sustained attention and short-term memory observed in our patients could potentially have long-term adverse consequences on school and social functioning [24]. This is further supported by the low scores on these subscales of the QoL in our children (data not shown).

Our study is limited by the lack of assessment at baseline or during ART interruption; therefore, any prior differences between arms cannot be accounted for. Because a comprehensive battery of assessments was not performed, subtle differences between arms could have been missed. Importantly, psychosocial and environmental data relevant to neurocognition and QoL were not collected. The duration of follow-up was relatively short, and NCI may become apparent later when children are older and required to engage in complex tasks. More of the continuous ART arm children were in the CDC C advanced HIV stage at the beginning of the main trial (64 vs. 32% in PTI), and fewer (73%) participated in the neurocognitive substudy compared with 84% of PTI children. This may have contributed to the favorable outcome observed in the PTI arm. However, both arms experienced no deaths or CDC C events during the entire follow-up duration.

The HIV field was reinvigorated with the news of HIV remission in the Mississippi baby [25], which sadly turned out not to be sustained [26]. In HIV cure research, intensively monitored antiretroviral pause (iMAP) is being employed as the ultimate test for a cure. iMAP is defined as a pause in ART that is accompanied by frequent monitoring for viral load rebound followed by a prompt resumption of treatment if rebound occurs [27]. Several studies involving administration of therapeutic vaccines with and without iMAP are being planned [28,29]. Our study provides reassuring information that no short-term neurocognitive and QoL effects from treatment interruption were observed. However, as these cure studies progress and include early treated children who may have preserved cognitive function, the effects of treatment interuption on neurocognition should be closely observed.

Finally, millions of children with HIV around the world are entering adolescence. Future research should focus on understanding their development of executive function including decision-making, planning, and self-regulation by taking into account the psychosocial and environmental contexts [30,31]. It will be important to leverage opportunities to study neurocognitive functioning in the context of treatment trials including pediatric cure trials to optimize performance and successful transition of youth with HIV into the work force.

Back to Top | Article Outline


We thank all the children, families, and staff from the centers participating in the PENTA 11 (TICCH) trial.

Sources of support: PENTA is a coordinated action of the European Commission/European Union, supported by the seventh framework programme (FP7/2007–2013) under the Eurocoord grant agreement number 260694, the sixth framework contract number LSHP-CT-2006-018865, the fifth framework programme contract number QLK2-CT-2000-00150, and by the PENTA Foundation.

Disclaimer: The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be construed to represent the positions of the US Army or the Department of Defense.

Back to Top | Article Outline

PENTA 11 (TICCH) Trial Committees

PENTA Steering Committee: J.-P. Aboulker, J. Ananworanich, A. Babiker, E. Belfrage, S. Bernardi, R. Bologna, D. Burger, K. Butler, G. Castelli-Gattinara, H. Castro, P. Clayden, A. Compagnucci, T. Cressey, J.H. Darbyshire, M. Debré, R. de Groot, M. della Negra, A. di Biagio, A. De Rossi, D. Duicelescu (deceased), A. Faye, C. Giaquinto (chairperson), V. Giacomet, D.M. Gibb, I. Grosch-Wörner, M. Hainault, N. Klein, M. Lallemant, J. Levy, H. Lyall, M. Marczynska, L. Marques, M. Mardarescu, M.J. Mellado Peña, D. Nadal, E. Nastouli, L. Naver, T. Niehues, C. Peckham, D. Pillay, J. Popieska, J.T. Ramos Amador, P. Rojo Conejo, L. Rosado, R. Rosso (deceased), C. Rudin, H.J. Scherpbier, M. Sharland, M. Stevanovic, C. Thorne, P.A. Tovo, G. Tudor-Williams, A. Turkova, N. Valerius, A. Volokha, A.S. Walker, S. Welch, U. Wintergerst.

PENTA 11 Executive Committee: J.P. Aboulker, A. Babiker, D.M. Burger, A. Compagnucci, J.H. Darbyshire, M. Debré, C. Giaquinto, D.M. Gibb, H. Green, L. Harper, N. Klein, M. Lallemant, H. Lyall, L. Mofenson, J. Moye, D. Nadal, Y. Saïdi.

PENTA 11 Pharmacology Group: D.M. Burger, T.R. Cressey, E. Jacqz-Aigrain, S. Khoo, M. Regazzi, J.M. Tréluyer.

PENTA 11 Immunology/Virology Group: A. De Rossi, N. Klein, J. Moye, N. Ngo-Giang-Huong, M.A. Muñoz Fernandez, D. Pillay.

PENTA 11 Data Safety and Monitoring Committee: C. Hill (chair until 2009), P. Lepage, A. Pozniak (Chair 2009), S. Vella, G. Chêne, T. Vesikari.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Trials centers

INSERM SC10, France: J.P. Aboulker, A. Compagnucci, G. Hadjou, S. Léonardo, Y. Riault, Y. Saïdi.

MRC Clinical Trials Unit, UK: A. Babiker, J. Bleier, L. Buck, H. Castro, J.H. Darbyshire, T. Duong, L. Farrelly, S. Forcat, D.M. Gibb, L. Harper, L. Harrison, J. Horton, D. Johnson, S. Montero, C. Taylor, A.S. Walker.

PHPT, Thailand: S. Chalermpantmetagul, T.R. Cressey, R. Peongjakta, W. Khamjakkaew, K. Than-in-at, S. Chailert, G. Jourdain, M. Lallemant, S. Le Coeur, N. Ngo-Giang-Huong.

Clinical sites: Pharmacists (P), Virologists/immunologists (L) Psychologists (PS).

France: Hôpital Femme-Mère-Enfant, Lyon/Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon: S. Corradini, D. Floret, P. Costanzo (PS) T.T. Le Thi (L); Hôpital de.

l’Archet, Nice: F. Monpoux, S. Mellul (L), I. Caranta (PS); Hôpital Cochin Port-Royal, Paris: N. Boudjoudi, G. Firtion, M. Denon, E. Charlemaine (Ps), F. Picard (L); Hôpital Robert Debré, Paris: A. Faye, E. Hellier (Ps), C. Heuninck (PS), F. Damond (L); G. Alexandre (L); Hôpital Purpan, Toulouse: J. Tricoire, M. Antras, C. Lachendowier (PS), F. Nicot (L); Hôpital Saint-Vincent de Paul, Paris: A. Krivine (L); D. Rivaux.

Germany: Universitäts-kinderkliniken, Munich: U. Wintergerst, G. Notheis, G. Strotmann, S. Schlieben.

Italy: Università di Padova: C. Giaquinto, O. Rampon, V. Boscolo (PS), M. Zanchetta (L); Università di Genova: R. Rosso*, F. Ginocchio, C. Viscoli, A. di Biagio; Ospedale Bambino Gesù, Rome: G. Castelli-Gattinara, S. Bernardi, A. Martino, G. Pontrelli, S. Baldassar (PS), C. Concato (L); Ospedale S. Chiara, Trento: A. Mazza, V. Boscolo (PS), G. Rossetti (L).

Poland: Medical University of Warsaw/Regional Hospital of Infectious Diseases, Warsaw: M. Marczynska, S. Dobosz, A. Oldakowska, J. Popielska, M. Kaflik, J. Stanczak (L), G. Stanczack (L), T. Dyda (L), M. Kruk (PS).

Spain: Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid: M.I. González Tomé, P. Rojo Conejo, R. Delgado García (L), M.T. Fernandez Gonzalez, G. Medin (PS); Hospital Carlos III, Madrid: M. José Mellado Peña, P. Martín Fontelos, M.I. Garcia Mellado, A.F. Medina, B. Ascencion (L); Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Madrid: J.T. Ramos Amador, I. Garcia Bermejo (L); Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid: D.M.L. Navarro Gomez, J. Saavedra, C. Prieto (L), J.L. Jimenez (L), M.A. Muñoz-Fernandez (L), A. Garcia Torre (L); Hospital Infantíl La Paz, Madrid: M.I. de José Gómez, M.C. García Rodriguez; Hospital Materno-Infantil, Málaga: D. Moreno Pérez, E. Núñez Cuadros; Hospital Infantil La Fe, Valencia: F. Asensi-Botet, C. Otero Reigada, M.D. Pérez Tamarit, R. Vilalta (PS), J.M. Molina Moreno (L).

Switzerland: University Chidren's Hospital, Zurich: D. Nadal, Truninger Rainer (PS); National Laboratory for Retrovirus, Zurich: J. Schupbach, M. Rutishauser.

Thailand: HIV-NAT, the Thai Red Cross AIDS Research Centre, Bangkok: T. Bunupuradah, J. Ananworanich, O. Butterworth, C. Phasomsap, W. Prasitsuebsai, T. Chuanjaroen, T. Jupimai, S. Ubolyam (L), P. Phanuphak, T. Puthanakit, C. Pancharoen; Nakornping Hospital, Chaing Mai: S. Kanjanavanit, T. Namwong, W. Punsakoon, S. Payakachat, D. Chutima, M. Raksasang, W. Punsakoon (PS), S. Payakachat (PS).

UK: Imperial College Hospital Healthcare Trust, London: H. Lyall, G. Tudor-Williams, C. Foster, D. Hamadache, S. Campbell, C. Newbould, C. Monrose, A. Abdulla, A. Walley, D. Melvin (PS), D. Patel (P), S. Kaye (L); Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London: H. Lyall, P. Seery, D. Hamadache, A. Rankin (PS), A. Wildfire (L); Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London: V. Novelli, D.M. Gibb, N. Klein, D. Shingadia, K. Moshal, J. Flynn, M. Clapson, L. Farrelly, A. Allen, L. Spencer, C. Rackstraw, B. Ward, K. Parkes, M. Depala (P), M. Jacobsen (L), H. Poulsom (L), L. Barkley (PS), J. Miah (PS), D. Melvin (PS), P. Lurie (PS), C. Keane (PS); University Hospital of North Staffordshire, Stoke on Trent: P. McMaster, M. Phipps, J. Orendi, C. Farmer; Newham University Hospital: S. Liebeschuetz, O. Sodeinde, D. Shingadia, S. Wong, V. Bostock (PS); Birmingham Heartlands Hospital: S. Welch, Y. Heath, S. Scott, K. Gandhi (P); University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust University Hospital: P. Lewis, J. Daglish, K. Miles, L. Summerhill (PS); Royal Free and University College Medical School, London: D. Pillay (L); Derbyshire Childrens Hospital: B. Subramaniam.

USA: SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse NY: L. Weiner, M. Famiglietti; Howard University Hospital, Washington DC: S. Rana, P. Yu, J. Roa; Children's Diagnostic & Treatment Center, Ft. Lauderdale, FL: A. Puga, A. Haerry.

D.M.G., A.C., and D.M. designed and provided oversight of the study. J.A., J.T.R.A., J.T.C., G.M., V.B., A.C., S.K., S.M., and D.M.G. conducted the study and provided scientific input on the study design and data interpretation. T.C. performed the analysis. D.M. directed the neurocognitive assessment and analysis. J.A. authored the first draft of the manuscript and finalized it with input from all coauthors.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Back to Top | Article Outline


1. Chiriboga CA, Fleishman S, Champion S, Gaye-Robinson L, Abrams EJ. Incidence and prevalence of HIV encephalopathy in children with HIV infection receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). J Pediatr 2005; 146:402–407.
2. Smith R, Malee K, Leighty R, Brouwers P, Mellins C, Hittelman J, et al. Effects of perinatal HIV infection and associated risk factors on cognitive development among young children. Pediatrics 2006; 117:851–862.
3. Walker SY, Pierre RB, Christie CD, Chang SM. Neurocognitive function in HIV-positive children in a developing country. Int J Infect Dis 2013; 17:e862–e867.
4. Nachman S, Chernoff M, Williams P, Hodge J, Heston J, Gadow KD. Human immunodeficiency virus disease severity, psychiatric symptoms, and functional outcomes in perinatally infected youth. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2012; 166:528–535.
5. Smith R, Chernoff M, Williams PL, Malee KM, Sirois PA, Kammerer B, et al. Impact of HIV severity on cognitive and adaptive functioning during childhood and adolescence. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2012; 31:592–598.
6. Storm DS, Boland MG, Gortmaker SL, He Y, Skurnick J, Howland L, et al. Protease inhibitor combination therapy, severity of illness, and quality of life among children with perinatally acquired HIV-1 infection. Pediatrics 2005; 115:e173–e182.
7. PENTA. Response to planned treatment interruptions in HIV infection varies across childhood. AIDS 2010; 24:231–241.
8. Bunupuradah T, Duong T, Compagnucci A, McMaster P, Bernardi S, Kanjanavanit S, et al. Outcomes after reinitiating antiretroviral therapy in children randomized to planned treatment interruptions. AIDS 2013; 27:579–589.
9. El-Sadr WM, Grund B, Neuhaus J, Babiker A, Cohen CJ, Darbyshire J, et al. Smart Study Group. Risk for opportunistic disease and death after reinitiating continuous antiretroviral therapy in patients with HIV previously receiving episodic therapy: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2008; 149:289–299.
10. Siberry GK, Patel K, Van Dyke RB, Hazra R, Burchett SK, Spector SA, et al. CD4+ lymphocyte-based immunologic outcomes of perinatally HIV-infected children during antiretroviral therapy interruption. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2011; 57:223–229.
11. Deeks SG, Autran B, Berkhout B, Benkirane M, Cairns S, Chomont N, et al. International AIDS Society Scientific Working Group on HIV Cure. Towards an HIV cure: a global scientific strategy. Nat Rev Immunol 2012; 12:607–614.
12. Varni JW, Seid M, Kurtin PS. PedsQL 4.0: reliability and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory version 4.0 generic core scales in healthy and patient populations. Med Care 2001; 39:800–812.
13. Schwimmer JB, Burwinkle TM, Varni JW. Health-related quality of life of severely obese children and adolescents. JAMA 2003; 289:1813–1819.
14. Naar-King S, Montepiedra G, Garvie P, Kammerer B, Malee K, Sirois PA, et al. Social ecological predictors of longitudinal HIV treatment adherence in youth with perinatally acquired HIV. J Pediatr Psychol 2013; 38:664–674.
15. Churchill M, Nath A. Where does HIV hide? A focus on the central nervous system. Curr Opin HIV AIDS 2013; 8:165–169.
16. Giedd JN, Blumenthal J, Jeffries NO, Castellanos FX, Liu H, Zijdenbos A, et al. Brain development during childhood and adolescence: a longitudinal MRI study. Nat Neurosci 1999; 2:861–863.
17. Nath A. Eradication of human immunodeficiency virus from brain reservoirs. J Neurovirol 2015; 21:227–234.
18. Jeremy RJ, Kim S, Nozyce M, Nachman S, McIntosh K, Pelton SI, et al. Neuropsychological functioning and viral load in stable antiretroviral therapy-experienced HIV-infected children. Pediatrics 2005; 115:380–387.
19. Puthanakit T, Ananworanich J, Vonthanak S, Kosalaraksa P, Hansudewechakul R, van der Lugt J, et al. Cognitive function and neurodevelopmental outcomes in HIV-infected Children older than 1 year of age randomized to early versus deferred antiretroviral therapy: the PREDICT neurodevelopmental study. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2013; 32:501–508.
20. Bunupuradah T, Kosalaraksa P, Vibol U, Hansudewechakul R, Sophonphan J, Kanjanavanit S, et al. Impact of antiretroviral therapy on quality of life in HIV-infected Southeast Asian children in the PREDICT study. AIDS Patient Care STDS 2013; 27:596–603.
21. Laughton B, Cornell M, Grove D, Kidd M, Springer PE, Dobbels E, et al. Early antiretroviral therapy improves neurodevelopmental outcomes in infants. AIDS 2012; 26:1685–1690.
22. Whitehead N, Potterton J, Coovadia A. The neurodevelopment of HIV-infected infants on HAART compared to HIV-exposed but uninfected infants. AIDS Care 2014; 26:497–504.
23. Van Rie A, Dow A, Mupuala A, Stewart P. Neurodevelopmental trajectory of HIV-infected children accessing care in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2009; 52:636–642.
24. Puthanakit T, Aurpibul L, Louthrenoo O, Tapanya P, Nadsasarn R, Insee-ard S, Sirisanthana V. Poor cognitive functioning of school-aged children in thailand with perinatally acquired HIV infection taking antiretroviral therapy. AIDS Patient Care STDS 2010; 24:141–146.
25. Persaud D, Gay H, Ziemniak C, Chen YH, Piatak M Jr, Chun TW, et al. Absence of detectable HIV-1 viremia after treatment cessation in an infant. N Engl J Med 2013; 369:1828–1835.
26. Luzuriaga K, Gay H, Ziemniak C, Sanborn KB, Somasundaran M, Rainwater-Lovett K, et al. Viremic relapse after HIV-1 remission in a perinatally infected child. N Engl J Med 2015; 372:786–788.
27. Li JZ, Smith DM, Mellors JW. The need for treatment interruption studies and biomarker identification in the search for an HIV cure. AIDS 2015; 29:1429–1432.
28. Klein N, Palma P, Luzuriaga K, Pahwa S, Nastouli E, Gibb DM, et al. Early antiretroviral therapy in children perinatally infected with HIV: a unique opportunity to implement immunotherapeutic approaches to prolong viral remission. Lancet Infect Dis 2015; 15:1108–1114.
29. Shiau S, Kuhn L. Antiretroviral treatment in HIV-infected infants and young children: novel issues raised by the Mississippi baby. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2014; 12:307–318.
30. Laughton B, Cornell M, Boivin M, Van Rie A. Neurodevelopment in perinatally HIV-infected children: a concern for adolescence. J Int AIDS Soc 2013; 16:18603.
31. Llorente AM, Brouwers P, Leighty R, Malee K, Smith R, Harris L, et al. An analysis of select emerging executive skills in perinatally HIV-1-infected children. Appl Neuropsychol Child 2014; 3:10–25.

antiretroviral therapy; children; HIV; neurocognition; neurodevelopment; quality of life; treatment interruption

Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.