Prevalence of and progression to abnormal noninvasive markers of liver disease (aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index and Fibrosis-4) among US HIV-infected youth : AIDS

Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

CLINICAL SCIENCE

Prevalence of and progression to abnormal noninvasive markers of liver disease (aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index and Fibrosis-4) among US HIV-infected youth

Kapogiannis, Bill G.; Leister, Erin; Siberry, George K.; Van Dyke, Russell B.; Rudy, Bret; Flynn, Patricia; Williams, Paige L. for the REACH Study and the PACTG 219219C Study

Author Information
AIDS 30(6):p 889-898, March 27, 2016. | DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001003

Abstract

Introduction

Combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) has led to a reduction in AIDS-associated morbidities and mortality, but a parallel rise in illnesses and deaths from non-AIDS causes including cardiovascular, hepatic, and renal disease has emerged in adults [1] and children [2,3]. Preliminary data suggest that HIV infection and ensuing inflammation may play a significant role in this process. HIV infection is associated with many hepatobiliary disorders, including hepatomegaly, steatosis, and elevated serum liver enzymes [4–7]. There is evidence to suggest that HIV interacts directly with multiple liver cell types [8–17]. Furthermore, some studies in adults have shown an association between control of HIV replication and favorable effect on liver fibrosis either by histopathology [18], or by novel approaches such as transient elastography [19], leading to speculation that these findings may be partly explained by interactions between hepatic stellate cells and HIV glycoproteins resulting in stimulation of collagen production [20].

Concomitant hepatitis B and C virus infections significantly increase the risk of progressive liver dysfunction and end-stage liver outcomes such as cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma and death in HIV-infected patients [21,22]. The risks and low acceptability of liver biopsy for histopathologic diagnosis and monitoring of liver disease and fibrosis have prompted exploration of alternative noninvasive approaches. Noninvasive markers of liver disease such as the Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) score [based on the serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT), the platelet count, and patient age] and the AST-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), have both been validated for identifying liver fibrosis and cirrhosis in adults with viral hepatitis [23–31]. While experience with these makers is extensive in adults, only a single study has compared APRI and liver biopsy in children [28] and there is little experience with these markers in children with HIV infection [32,33].

We undertook this study to evaluate and characterize noninvasive biomarkers of liver fibrosis among HIV-uninfected and HIV-infected youth. We hypothesized that there would be differences in these markers by HIV status and by route of infection among youth with HIV.

Methods

Study population

Reaching for Excellence in Adolescent Care and Health (REACH) was a prospective observational cohort study aimed at improving the understanding and management of HIV disease progression and comorbidities in HIV-infected and uninfected at-risk youth adolescents 12–18 years old in which sequential behavioral and biomedical assessments, including biological specimens, were obtained every 6 months from March 1996 through November 1999. Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group (PACTG) 219/219C was a prospective, multicenter cohort study designed to assess the long-term consequences of HIV-1 infection and its treatment in infants, children, and adolescents, and of in utero and neonatal exposure to antiretroviral therapy (ART) drugs in HIV-1 exposed but uninfected infants born to women enrolled in PACTG clinical trials to prevent mother-to-child HIV-1 transmission. PACTG 219/219C also performed serial biomedical assessments and collected biological specimens from April 1993 through May 2007. This analysis included four separate cohorts for comparison: uninfected youth from REACH; behaviorally HIV-infected youth from REACH; behaviorally HIV-infected youth from P219/219C; and perinatally HIV-infected youth from P219/219C, with all four cohorts including only those with liver biomarker measurements available between the ages of 15 and 20 years. Individuals with known hepatitis B or C infection were excluded from this analysis, though routine testing was not required by the study protocols.

Determination of Fibrosis-4 and aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index scores

The FIB-4 index is calculated as follows:

The APRI is calculated as follows.

The relevant clinical thresholds suggestive of fibrosis have been previously validated in adults: FIB-4 scores more than 1.45 and more than 3.25 and APRI scores of more than 0.5 and more than 1.5 are suggestive of mild-to-moderate and advanced fibrosis, respectively [26–28,30,31]. Because both FIB-4 and APRI are functions of AST/platelets, a direct numerical relationship between the two measures can be expressed as FIB-4 = K × APRI, where K = (Age × AST ULN)/(100 × √ALT).

Statistical analysis

The majority of HIV-uninfected youth in the REACH cohort had only a single measurement of liver biomarkers and the uninfected youth from P219/219C were too young to meet eligibility criteria. Thus, we first conducted a cross-sectional comparison of FIB-4 and APRI measures across all four cohorts defined by study, HIV infection status, and route of infection. Because the 219C perinatally HIV-infected (PHIV) youth (cohort D) tended to be younger than other groups, we based this cross-sectional comparison on the latest available measurement before or at age 20 years in this cohort, and the earliest measurement at age 15 years or older in the other three cohorts. FIB-4 and APRI measures were log-transformed for all analyses to more closely approximate a normal distribution.

Secondly, among HIV-infected youth, an analysis of the longitudinal measures between ages 15 and 20 years was conducted using repeated measures mixed effect linear regression models to estimate trends in log-transformed scores, adjusting for age, sex, exposure (behavioral or perinatal route of infection) category, and body mass index z-score (BMIZ). Specifically, this objective was addressed by fitting a model for each liver biomarker (FIB-4 and APRI) as a function of age at visit, with a random effect for participant to account for within-subject correlations. The slope of the age coefficient was evaluated via a Wald test to determine whether there was a significant increase (or decrease) in each liver biomarker over time. Interaction terms between age and route of exposure were added to the model to evaluate whether the trends over age differed between perinatally vs. behaviorally infected youth.

Because FIB-4 and APRI have not traditionally been used in children under 18 years of age, two analyses were conducted to evaluate the internal consistency and agreement between these measures in a younger population. Concordance between the log-transformed FIB-4 and APRI scores was assessed by calculating Pearson correlation coefficients, overall and for each year of age between 15 and 20 years, and additional evaluation of these two biomarkers for this age range was conducted by evaluating within-person correlations for each separate liver biomarker to assess reproducibility. For the purposes of this longitudinal analysis, ‘baseline’ is defined as the earliest visit available for participants between ages 15 and 20 years.

Among HIV-infected youth with 2 or more visits, in those with low baseline scores (APRI ≤ 0.5 or FIB ≤ 1.5), we estimated and compared incidence rates of progression with higher scores during follow-up using Poisson regression models. In addition, the effect of cART on liver score progression was evaluated by fitting a mixed effect linear regression model similar to that described above. This model included an effect for cART initiation as a time-varying covariate, reflecting current use of cART at the time of liver biomarker measurement. These models were also employed to evaluate the association of CD4+ cell count and viral load with longitudinally measured FIB-4 and APRI scores, again including a random effect of participant and a fixed effect of age to reflect trends over time. To evaluate the clinical utility of FIB-4 and APRI scores, Cox proportional hazards models were fit with the liver biomarkers as predictors (based on the earliest measure) of time to death or clinical progression, where clinical progression was based on transitioning to a CDC Class C [34] among those without such prior classifications. All models were fit using SAS version 9.2 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA).

Results

Population characteristics and correlation study

Of 4088 potential participants, 1785 met criteria for inclusion (Fig. 1). Characteristics of the subgroups at the time the liver function tests (LFTs) were obtained are shown in Table 1. The REACH cohorts had a higher percentage of women than did the 219/219C cohorts, with higher mean BMIZ. PHIV youth in PACTG 219/219C were more often on protease inhibitor-containing cART than the other groups, and had the best virologic and immunologic parameters.

F1-8
Fig. 1:
Study population determination for liver biomarker analysis.
T1-8
Table 1:
Demographic and HIV-related characteristics among Reaching for Excellence in Adolescent Care and Health and Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group 219/219C participants with liver function tests between age 15 and 20 years.

The HIV-infected cohorts were followed for a median of 2 years. On the basis of evaluation of the repeated measurements from ages 15 to 20 years, the within-subject correlations for FIB-4 and APRI were 0.60 and 0.56, respectively, indicating similar repeatability of each liver biomarker over time. In addition, and as expected given their proportional relationship, there was a high correlation between the log-transformed APRI and FIB-4 measures (r = 0.85), which did not vary by age (data not shown).

Association of HIV infection with Fibrosis-4 and aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index scores

The cross-sectional analysis characterizing the distribution of FIB-4 and APRI scores by relevant clinical thresholds indicated that a higher percentage of HIV-infected than uninfected youth had APRI scores more than 0.5, suggesting at least mild-to-moderate fibrosis (13 vs. 3%, P < 0.001) (Table 1). Elevated FIB-4 was less common in both infected and uninfected youth (2 vs. 1%, P = 0.42). In adjusted models, among the entire sample, being HIV-infected, men, and having a low BMIZ were each associated with an APRI more than 0.5 (each P < 0.02); among only HIV-infected participants, male gender, low CD4+ cell count (<350 cells/μl) and unsuppressed viral load (VL) (>400 copies/ml) were each associated with APRI more than 0.5 (each P < 0.02).

In the cross-sectional analysis exploring the associations of HIV infection and other covariates with continuous (log-transformed) FIB-4 and APRI scores (Table 2), being HIV-infected and PHIV were each associated with significantly higher scores for both log APRI and log FIB-4. These differences also persisted after adjustment for potential confounders, including calendar year. Youth of older age, male gender, nonwhite race, low BMIZ, low CD4+ cell count, unsuppressed viral load, and prior or current didanosine use had significantly higher log FIB-4 scores; these findings also held for log APRI scores except that age, race, or BMIZ were not significantly associated with APRI scores. Finally, prior or current stavudine use was not associated with either log FIB-4 or APRI scores.

T2-8
Table 2:
Adjusted geometric means for noninvasive serum biomarkers within specific subgroups, based on cross-sectional analysis.a

Progression to Fibrosis-4 and aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index scores suggestive of fibrosis more common than expected among this HIV-infected youth cohort

During the study, the incidence of progression to FIB-4 scores suggesting mild-to-moderate fibrosis was 1.6 cases [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2, 2.2] per 100 person-years, whereas the incidence for progression to APRI scores suggesting mild-to-moderate fibrosis was 7.5 cases (95% CI 6.5, 8.7) (Supplemental Table 1 https://links.lww.com/QAD/A859). The incidence of progression to more advanced levels of fibrosis was 0.3 (95% CI 0.2, 0.6) for FIB-4 (defined as FIB-4 > 3.25) and 1.4 cases per 100 person-years (95% CI 1.0, 1.9) for APRI (defined as APRI > 1.5). Having a CD4+ cell count of less than 350 cells/μl at the first visit between ages 15 and 20 years was associated with higher incidence rates of progression for each threshold evaluated for FIB-4 and APRI, with incidence rate ratios ranging from 2 to over 7 (Supplemental Table 1 https://links.lww.com/QAD/A859). Incidence rates did not vary by any of the four subcohorts or baseline viral load (data not shown).

Predicted mean log Fibrosis-4 and aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index increased over time but were attenuated by improvements in measures of HIV disease activity

Longitudinal trends in mean log-transformed FIB-4 (Fig. 2) and APRI scores (Fig. 3) were estimated, adjusting for potential confounders. The mean log FIB-4 scores, which are a function of age, increased by 6% per year of age, regardless of exposure category (P < 0.001) (Fig. 2a). In contrast, the mean log APRI scores only increased significantly among those with perinatal HIV infection, by 2% per year of age (P = 0.007) (Fig. 3a). For both biomarkers, there was no association with calendar year and increases with age persisted after adjustment for calendar year.

F2-8
Fig. 2:
Predicted log aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index scores over time among HIV-infected youth aged 15–20 years old, by various risk factors including route of HIV infection, sex, BMI z score, CD4+ cell count, HIV RNA viral load level, and antiretroviral (ARV) treatment status.Predicted scores were based on mixed effect models with a random effect for each participant to account for within-subject correlation over time. APRI scores were estimated to increase by 2% per year for perinatally infected youth only, were 24% higher for men than women, 21% higher for those with CD4+ less than 350 vs. more than 350 cells/μl, 23% higher for those with viral load more than 400 copies/ml vs. less than 400 copies, and 17% higher for those on no ARVs vs. on ARVs. APRI, aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index.
F3-8
Fig. 3:
Predicted log FIB-4 scores over time among HIV-infected youth aged 15–20 years old, by various risk factors including route of HIV infection, sex, BMI z score, CD4+ cell count, HIV RNA viral load level, and antiretroviral treatment (ARV) status.Predicted scores were based on mixed effect models with a random effect for each participant to account for within-subject correlation over time. APRI scores were estimated to increase by 6% per year, were 13% higher for men than women, 19% higher for those with CD4<350 vs. >350 cells/ul, 17% higher for those with VL>400 copies/mL vs. <400 copies, and 12% higher for those on no ARVs vs. on ARVs. APRI, aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index.

When FIB-4 and APRI score trajectories were further evaluated longitudinally by the demographic and clinical characteristics described, there were clear and statistically significant differences among all parameters but BMIZ (Figs 2c and 3c). FIB-4 score trajectories were, on average, higher by about 13% in men (P < 0.001) (Fig. 2b), 19% in those with CD4+ cell counts less than 350 cells/μl (P < 0.001) (Fig. 2d), 17% in those with unsuppressed VL (P < 0.001) (Fig. 2e) and 12% in those not on any antiretrovirals (P < 0.001) (Fig. 2f). APRI score trajectories were, on average, higher by about 24% in men (P < 0.001) (Fig. 3b), 21% in those with CD4+ cell counts less than 350 cells/μl (P < 0.001) (Fig. 3d), 23% in those with unsuppressed VL (P < 0.001) (Fig. 3e) and 17% in those not on any antiretrovirals (P < 0.001) (Fig. 3f). No interactions were observed between any of these characteristics and increasing individual age.

Progression to CDC class C disease and/or death was associated with lower BMIZ, higher HIV viral load and lower CD4+ cell counts in unadjusted models, with an approximate 2-fold higher risk of progression for each log increase in either baseline FIB-4 or APRI score (Supplemental Table 2 https://links.lww.com/QAD/A859). However, once adjusted for BMIZ, CD4+ cell count, viral load, and receipt of ART (variables that are more tightly associated with disease activity) these associations were attenuated and no longer significant.

Discussion

We demonstrate, in the largest cohort of its kind and in a young population likely free of liver comorbidities such as viral hepatitis, diabetes, and substance use, that HIV infection is an important and independent contributor to liver fibrosis score elevation and progression, and that factors associated with uncontrolled HIV replication were predictive of higher APRI and FIB-4 scores over time.

Our findings were generally consistent with those from other studies [23,25,29]. In their evaluation of FIB-4 markers in HIV-monoinfected women, the associations of low CD4+ cell count, detectable viral load, and ART use in the study of Blackard et al.[23] were consistent with our findings. Among those who evaluated specific ART backbones, DallaPiazza et al.[25] did not find an association between either stavudine or didanosine use and an elevated APRI among HIV-monoinfected adults, in contrast to our finding of an association with didanosine but not stavudine; however, small numbers may contribute to these findings. The association of higher APRI scores in men has also been previously reported [29,35,36] and includes attribution to possible greater alcohol use among men than women, as well as other biological, environmental and psychosocial influences. Our study is limited in exploring this as our larger subcohort (PACTG 219/C) did not systematically collect data on substance use. Finally, the association of higher FIB-4 scores with low BMIZ probably reflects underlying poor control of HIV disease activity, though this should be interpreted cautiously as it was not consistently found with APRI scores.

To understand the clinical relevance of our findings, we evaluated the prevalence of liver marker score elevation among our cohort using thresholds previously established by others to be suggestive of varying degrees of fibrosis. Congruent with our above findings, the prevalence of evidence of at least mild-to-moderate fibrosis or worse (APRI > 0.5 or FIB-4 > 1.45) was also consistently higher among HIV-infected participants compared with their uninfected counterparts, though only statistically significant for APRI. Our prevalence rate of APRI more than 0.5 and more than 1.5 was 10 and 2%, respectively, which was comparable to another domestic study of HIV-infected children whose rates were 6.5 and 0.8% [33], respectively, and slightly lower compared with a Latin American study of HIV-infected children whose rate of APRI more than 1.5 was 3.2% [32]. The smaller evaluable sample for FIB-4 showed a similar trend that did not achieve statistical significance. Only male gender, low CD4+ cell count, and detectable HIV viral load were found to be independently associated with achievement of an APRI score suggestive of mild-to-moderate fibrosis or worse, which is consistent with findings from the Latin American pediatric cohort with perinatally transmitted HIV-infection [32].

Few studies have evaluated the incidence of progression of noninvasive markers of liver disease over time [29,33] and only one was in HIV-infected children. This pediatric study only evaluated APRI and, while their rate of progression to an APRI more than 0.5 was comparable to ours, that of APRI more than 1.5, which is suggestive of significant and advanced fibrosis, was almost threefold higher among our cohort. FIB-4 has not been previously evaluated in children. Among the Italian adult cohort, the rates of progression to APRI more than 0.5 and more than 1.5, and to FIB-4 more than 1.45 and more than 3.25 were very comparable to our findings for APRI but were several fold higher for FIB-4 among the adult group [29]. This latter difference may be in part because of the age factor in the FIB-4 formula, something that is currently being evaluated as part of a separate analysis. The finding that a low CD4+ T-cell count, but not a detectable HIV viral load, at the first visit between age 15 and 20 years, was predictive of progression to higher APRI and FIB-4 scores probably reflects the greater contribution of a more stable measure of HIV disease activity such as CD4+ cell count than would be of a more dynamic indicator like viral load.

Finally, no studies have examined the longitudinal trajectories of APRI or FIB-4. After adjustments, the predicted mean log-transformed scores significantly increased over time for APRI and FIB-4; however, the magnitude of the increase was lower for APRI than FIB-4 and only significant among the perinatal cohort for APRI, which again suggests that the age in the FIB-4 formula may be playing a role in these differences. When looking at these scores by demographic and clinical characteristics, the predicted trajectories for the mean log APRI and FIB-4 scores were, on average, 13–28% higher for parameters mainly associated with poor control of HIV disease activity. Taken together all of these data suggest that active, uncontrolled HIV replication for prolonged periods that leads to immunodepletion and worsening of disease activity, results in increased surrogate markers of liver disease and that ART receipt mitigates these outcomes.

Our study does have some notable limitations. Liver histopathology was unavailable to validate our results. We could not ascertain any potential contribution of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease [37], although it is reassuring that the only association we found was among those with the lowest BMIZ and higher FIB-4. Also, the experience with FIB-4 markers has been limited to adult patients with liver disease and/or HIV infection and has not been evaluated or validated in children. Additionally, FIB-4 and APRI depend on platelet counts which, in general, are not as affected in our younger population (e.g., in contrast to longstanding advanced liver disease and cirrhosis seen in adults) and thus, the scores in our study may potentially underestimate the histopathologic severity of fibrosis. Data on the presence of diabetes and substance use were also not available. Finally, the absence of routine hepatitis virus surveillance could also be a potential limitation; However, given that routine liver function testing has been a standard of care for HIV-infected children (e.g. every 3 months), it would be unusual that a diagnosis of subclinical hepatitis infection would have been missed among an otherwise highly scrutinized research cohort.

In conclusion, the PACTG 219/219c and REACH studies have provided a unique opportunity to conduct an extensive, longitudinal evaluation of APRI and FIB-4 in a large cohort of children. Future studies might include liver stiffness assessments, novel biochemical markers, and validation with biopsy, to determine cause/effect relationships associated with therapeutic interventions or confounding variables and their impact on clinical outcomes. The validation of these noninvasive markers for identifying and monitoring liver disease would be particularly important for youth with perinatally acquired HIV infection who face a lifetime of HIV, ART and other potential risk factors for liver disease.

Acknowledgements

We are indebted to the Pediatric HIV/AIDS Cohort Study (PHACS) that provided support for the conduct of this analysis (Dr George Seage, PI of Data and Operations Center, U01HD052102, and Dr Russell Van Dyke, PI of Clinical Coordinating Center, U01HD052104). REACH was supported by U01HD32842 through the Adolescent Medicine HIV/AIDS Research Network (AMHARN). The authors thank investigators and staff [listed in J Adolesc Health Sept 2001, Vol 29, Issue 3 (supplement 1): 5–6] of AMHARN (1994–2001) and the youth who participated in the REACH project for their valuable contributions. PACTG 219/219C was supported through the following cooperative agreements: Overall support for the International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Group (IMPAACT) was provided by U01AI068632. The Statistical and Data Analysis Center at Harvard School of Public Health was supported under cooperative agreement U01AI41110 with the PACTG and under U01 AI068616 with the IMPAACT Group. Support of the sites was provided by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver NICHD International and Domestic Pediatric and Maternal HIV Clinical Trials Network funded by NICHD (contract number N01-DK-9-001/HHSN267200800001C). The authors thank investigators and staff [listed in AIDS July 2013, Vol 27, Issue 12: 1959–1970] of the Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group (PACTG) 219/219C protocols (1993–2007) and the youth who participated in these protocols for their valuable contributions. We also would like to thank all investigators from the Adolescent Medicine Trials Network for HIV/AIDS Interventions (ATN), PHACS, and IMPAACT who were involved in the review of this study for their invaluable expertise and input.

This work was supported by the following main entities: PACTG 219/219C.

Overall support for the International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Group (IMPAACT) was provided by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [U01 AI068632] and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) International and Domestic Pediatric and Maternal HIV Clinical Trials Network supported by the NICHD [contract N01-3-3345 and HHSN267200800001C]. Additional support was provided by the Statistical and Data Analysis Center at Harvard School of Public Health, under the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases cooperative agreement #5 U01 AI41110 with the Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group (PACTG) and #1 U01 AI068616 with the IMPAACT Group.

The REACH and PACTG 219/219C studies received support from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) and the National Institutes of Health.

REACH: The Reaching for Excellence in Adolescent Care and Heath cohort was supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [U01HD32842] through the Adolescent Medicine HIV/AIDS Research Network (AMHARN).

PHACS: The analyses for this work were funded by the Pediatric HIV/AIDS Cohort Study (PHACS), which was supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) with cofunding from the National Institute on Drug Abuse, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, the Office of AIDS Research, the National Institute of Mental Health, the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, and the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, through cooperative agreements with the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health [HD052102] and the Tulane University School of Medicine [HD052104].

R.B.V.D. NIH-funded investigator in PHACS and IMPAACT networks, including support to travel to network meetings; P.F. NIH-funded investigator in PHACS and IMPAACT networks; also receives support for consultancy to Merck's Safety Monitoring Committee and royalties for the publication of UpToDate; E.L., P.L.W. NIH-funded Data and Operations center for the Pediatric HIV/AIDS Cohort Study and IMPAACT, under cooperative agreements U01 HD052102 and #1 U01 AI068616, respectively. The remaining authors had nothing to declare.

Conflicts of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

References

1. El-Sadr WM, Lundgren JD, Neaton JD, Gordin F, Abrams D, Arduino RC, et al. CD4+ count-guided interruption of antiretroviral treatment. N Engl J Med 2006; 355:2283–2296.
2. Brady MT, Oleske JM, Williams PL, Elgie C, Mofenson LM, Dankner WM, et al. Declines in mortality rates and changes in causes of death in HIV-1-infected children during the HAART era. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2010; 53:86–94.
3. Kapogiannis BG, Soe MM, Nesheim SR, Abrams EJ, Carter RJ, Farley J, et al. Mortality trends in the U.S. Perinatal AIDS Collaborative Transmission Study (1986–2004). Clin Infect Dis 2011; 53:1024–1034.
4. Bonacini M. Hepatobiliary complications in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Am J Med 1992; 92:404–411.
5. Ingiliz P, Valantin MA, Duvivier C, Medja F, Dominguez S, Charlotte F, et al. Liver damage underlying unexplained transaminase elevation in human immunodeficiency virus-1 mono-infected patients on antiretroviral therapy. Hepatology 2009; 49:436–442.
6. Kahn JO, Walker BD. Acute human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. N Engl J Med 1998; 339:33–39.
7. Keaveny AP, Karasik MS. Hepatobiliary and pancreatic infections in AIDS: Part one. AIDS Patient Care STDS 1998; 12:347–357.
8. Balasubramanian A, Ganju RK, Groopman JE. Hepatitis C virus and HIV envelope proteins collaboratively mediate interleukin-8 secretion through activation of p38 MAP kinase and SHP2 in hepatocytes. J Biol Chem 2003; 278:35755–35766.
9. Banerjee R, Sperber K, Pizzella T, Mayer L. Inhibition of HIV-1 productive infection in hepatoblastoma HepG2 cells by recombinant tumor necrosis factor-alpha. AIDS 1992; 6:1127–1131.
10. Blackard JT, Sherman KE. HCV/HIV co-infection: time to re-evaluate the role of HIV in the liver?. J Viral Hepat 2008; 15:323–330.
11. Cao YZ, Dieterich D, Thomas PA, Huang YX, Mirabile M, Ho DD. Identification and quantitation of HIV-1 in the liver of patients with AIDS. AIDS 1992; 6:65–70.
12. Cao YZ, Friedman-Kien AE, Huang YX, Li XL, Mirabile M, Moudgil T, et al. CD4-independent, productive human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection of hepatoma cell lines in vitro. J Virol 1990; 64:2553–2559.
13. Donaldson YK, Bell JE, Ironside JW, Brettle RP, Robertson JR, Busuttil A, et al. Redistribution of HIV outside the lymphoid system with onset of AIDS. Lancet 1994; 343:383–385.
14. Housset C, Lamas E, Brechot C. Detection of HIV1 RNA and p24 antigen in HIV1-infected human liver. Res Virol 1990; 141:153–159.
15. Housset C, Lamas E, Courgnaud V, Boucher O, Girard PM, Marche C, et al. Presence of HIV-1 in human parenchymal and nonparenchymal liver cells in vivo. J Hepatol 1993; 19:252–258.
16. Munshi N, Balasubramanian A, Koziel M, Ganju RK, Groopman JE. Hepatitis C and human immunodeficiency virus envelope proteins cooperatively induce hepatocytic apoptosis via an innocent bystander mechanism. J Infect Dis 2003; 188:1192–1204.
17. Vlahakis SR, Villasis-Keever A, Gomez TS, Bren GD, Paya CV. Human immunodeficiency virus-induced apoptosis of human hepatocytes via CXCR4. J Infect Dis 2003; 188:1455–1460.
18. Brau N, Salvatore M, Rios-Bedoya CF, Fernandez-Carbia A, Paronetto F, Rodriguez-Orengo JF, et al. Slower fibrosis progression in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients with successful HIV suppression using antiretroviral therapy. J Hepatol 2006; 44:47–55.
19. Grunhage F, Wasmuth JC, Herkenrath S, Vidovic N, Goldmann G, Rockstroh J, et al. Transient elastography discloses identical distribution of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C between HIV-negative and HIV-positive patients on HAART. Eur J Med Res 2010; 15:139–144.
20. Bruno R, Galastri S, Sacchi P, Cima S, Caligiuri A, DeFranco R, et al. gp120 modulates the biology of human hepatic stellate cells: a link between HIV infection and liver fibrogenesis. Gut 2010; 59:513–520.
21. Merwat SN, Vierling JM. HIV infection and the liver: the importance of HCV-HIV coinfection and drug-induced liver injury. Clin Liver Dis 2011; 15:131–152.
22. Thio CL. Hepatitis B and human immunodeficiency virus coinfection. Hepatology 2009; 49:S138–S145.
23. Blackard JT, Welge JA, Taylor LE, Mayer KH, Klein RS, Celentano DD, et al. HIV mono-infection is associated with FIB-4 -- a noninvasive index of liver fibrosis -- in women. Clin Infect Dis 2011; 52:674–680.
24. Cales P, Halfon P, Batisse D, Carrat F, Perre P, Penaranda G, et al. Comparison of liver fibrosis blood tests developed for HCV with new specific tests in HIV/HCV co-infection. J Hepatol 2010; 53:238–244.
25. DallaPiazza M, Amorosa VK, Localio R, Kostman JR, Vincent Lo Re, III. Prevalence and risk factors for significant liver fibrosis among HIV-monoinfected patients. BMC Infect Dis 2010; 10:116.
26. Loko MA, Castera L, Dabis F, Le Bail B, Winnock M, Coureau G, et al. Validation and comparison of simple noninvasive indexes for predicting liver fibrosis in HIV-HCV-coinfected patients: ANRS CO3 Aquitaine cohort. Am J Gastroenterol 2008; 103:1973–1980.
27. Macias J, Gonzalez J, Ortega E, Tural C, Cabrero E, Burgos A, et al. Use of simple noninvasive biomarkers to predict liver fibrosis in HIV/HCV coinfection in routine clinical practice. HIV Med 2010; 11:439–447.
28. McGoogan KE, Smith PB, Choi SS, Berman W, Jhaveri R. Performance of the AST-to-platelet ratio index as a noninvasive marker of fibrosis in pediatric patients with chronic viral hepatitis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2010; 50:344–346.
29. Mendeni M, Foca E, Gotti D, Ladisa N, Angarano G, Albini L, et al. Evaluation of liver fibrosis: concordance analysis between noninvasive scores (APRI and FIB-4) evolution and predictors in a cohort of HIV-infected patients without hepatitis C and B infection. Clin Infect Dis 2011; 52:1164–1173.
30. Sterling RK, Lissen E, Clumeck N, Sola R, Correa MC, Montaner J, et al. Development of a simple noninvasive index to predict significant fibrosis in patients with HIV/HCV coinfection. Hepatology 2006; 43:1317–1325.
31. Wai CT, Greenson JK, Fontana RJ, Kalbfleisch JD, Marrero JA, Conjeevaram HS, et al. A simple noninvasive index can predict both significant fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 2003; 38:518–526.
32. Siberry GK, Cohen RA, Harris DR, Cruz ML, Oliveira R, Peixoto MF, et al. Prevalence and predictors of elevated aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index in Latin American perinatally HIV-infected children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2014; 33:177–182.
33. Siberry GK, Patel K, Pinto JA, Puga A, Mirza A, Miller TL, et al. Elevated aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index in perinatally HIV-infected children in the United States. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2014; 33:855–857.
34. 1993 revised classification system for HIV infection and expanded surveillance case definition for AIDS among adolescents and adults. MMWR Recomm Rep 1992; 41:1–19.
35. Clark JM, Brancati FL, Diehl AM. The prevalence and etiology of elevated aminotransferase levels in the United States. Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98:960–967.
36. Ioannou GN, Weiss NS, Boyko EJ, Kahn SE, Lee SP. Contribution of metabolic factors to alanine aminotransferase activity in persons with other causes of liver disease. Gastroenterology 2005; 128:627–635.
37. Morse CG, McLaughlin M, Matthews L, Proschan M, Thomas F, Gharib AM, et al. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and hepatic fibrosis in HIV-1-monoinfected adults with elevated aminotransferase levels on antiretroviral therapy. Clin Infect Dis 2015; 60:1569–1578.
Keywords:

adolescents; HIV infection; noninvasive liver disease markers

Supplemental Digital Content

Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.