Share this article on:

Maternal and child psychological outcomes of HIV disclosure to young children in rural South Africa: the Amagugu intervention

Rochat, Tamsen J.a,b,c; Arteche, Adriane X.d; Stein, Alanc,e; Mitchell, Joaniea,b; Bland, Ruth M.a,e,f

doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000000668
Open Access Icon

Objectives: Increasingly, HIV-infected parents are surviving to nurture their children. Parental HIV disclosure is beneficial, but disclosure rates to younger children remain low. Previously, we demonstrated that the ‘Amagugu’ intervention increased disclosure to young children; however, effects on psychological outcomes have not been examined in detail. This study investigates the impact of the intervention on the maternal and child psychological outcomes.

Method: This pre-post evaluation design enrolled 281 HIV-infected women and their HIV-uninfected children (6–10 years) at the Africa Centre for Health and Population Studies, in rural South Africa. The intervention included six home-based counselling sessions delivered by lay-counsellors. Psychological outcomes included maternal psychological functioning (General Health Questionnaire, GHQ12 using 0,1,2,3 scoring); parenting stress (Parenting Stress Index, PSI36); and child emotional and behavioural functioning (Child Behaviour Checklist, CBCL).

Results: The proportions of mothers with psychological distress reduced after intervention: GHQ threshold at least 12 (from 41.3 to 24.9%, P < 0.001) and GHQ threshold at least 20 (from 17.8 to 11.7%, P = 0.040). Parenting stress scores also reduced (Pre M = 79.8; Post M = 76.2, P < 0.001): two subscales, parental distress and parent–child relationship, showed significant improvement, while mothers’ perception of ‘child as difficult’ was not significantly improved. Reductions in scores were not moderated by disclosure level (full/partial). There was a significant reduction in child emotional and behavioural problems (CBCL Pre M = 56.1; Post M = 48.9, P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Amagugu led to improvements in mothers’ and children's mental health and parenting stress, irrespective of disclosure level, suggesting general nonspecific positive effects on family relationships. Findings require validation in a randomized control trial.

aAfrica Centre for Health and Population Studies, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban

bDepartment of Psychology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa

cSection of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

dDepartment of Psychology, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre, Brazil

eSchool of Public Health, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

fInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, and Royal Hospital for Sick Children, University of Glasgow, UK.

Correspondence to Michael Richards E-mail:

Received 12 March, 2015

Revised 13 March, 2015

Accepted 13 March, 2015

Back to Top | Article Outline


Sub-Saharan Africa has seen many advances in HIV treatment and prevention over the last decade. The scale-up of antiretroviral treatment (ART) and prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) programmes have changed the face of HIV for HIV-infected parents and their children [1,2]. Children of HIV-infected mothers are now often born uninfected in areas with functioning HIV programmes, including many parts of Africa [3–6]. In this era of improved treatment access, new challenges arise, as an increasingly large population of parents are surviving, supporting families and raising children [7,8]. Families affected by HIV face many psychosocial challenges [9] and are known to have elevated psychological and social stressors [10].

Disclosure of one's own HIV status, whether to partner, children or families, not only presents many psychosocial challenges but also offers potential to increase support for oneself [11]. Available evidence [12–14] shows that disclosure of a mother's HIV status to her HIV-uninfected children results in improvements in family communication and is associated with mental health benefits for mothers, children and families. In 2011, the WHO published Guidelines on Disclosure to Children, encouraging disclosure of parental HIV status to HIV-uninfected children aged 6–12 years [11]. Despite these reported benefits, largely demonstrated in high-income countries [15], rates of disclosure remain relatively low globally [14,16] and there is a paucity of interventions appropriate to low-resource, HIV endemic settings.

Where household burden of HIV is high [17], children are likely to be socially exposed to HIV at much younger ages than in nonepidemic areas, and there is evidence that nondisclosure may have negative effects on them [14].

TRACK, a maternal disclosure intervention, was tested in a randomized controlled trial [18] in the United States with 69 families with children aged 6–12 years. The intervention comprised three home visits, telephone support and educational materials, and found that mothers were four times more likely to disclose than controls (33 vs. 7%). This indicated that interventions could target HIV disclosure with younger children and had benefits for children's mental health. However, no studies, apart from the Amagugu intervention [19], have reported on maternal HIV disclosure interventions in rural regions in Africa.

Amagugu was designed specifically for use in low-resource, endemic HIV settings, and targets young children (6–10 years) [20]. In a nonexperimental evaluation with 281 families [19], Amagugu was found to be effective in supporting maternal disclosure. Encouragingly, all mothers undertook some level of disclosure, with 61% of mothers fully disclosing their HIV status (using the words HIV), and 39% undertaking partial disclosure, without saying the words HIV. We showed general improvements in maternal mental and child mental health.

This study investigates in detail whether the intervention had effects on maternal psychological functioning, parenting stress and children's psychological functioning, and whether any effects on these outcomes were moderated by the level of disclosure.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Materials and methods


The research was undertaken at the Africa Centre for Health and Population Studies in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa (2010–2012). This area has one of the highest population-based HIV prevalence rates worldwide [21,22]. Two successful HIV programmes have been rolled out: a Prevention of Mother-to-Child Transmission of HIV programme, implemented in 2001, followed by a decentralised HIV Treatment programme in 2004 [2,23]. This population has high levels of household exposure to HIV [17], wide access to ART treatment [24] and consequent improvements in life expectancy [25] and quality of life [1].

Back to Top | Article Outline

The intervention

The ‘Amagugu’ intervention is documented in detail elsewhere [20] and summarized in Fig. 1, which illustrates the three intervention stages, the working hypothesis for each, along with the purpose and tools for each session. It was delivered to mothers at home and provided printed materials and child-friendly activities supporting age-appropriate disclosure. The disclosure training content addressed maternal preparation for children's emotional reactions, and questions following disclosure [20]. Although structured, the intervention was flexible enough for mothers to adjust content to suit their personal circumstances, level of readiness and family needs. Lay-counsellors did not intervene directly with children; instead, training and support were provided to the mother, to communicate with her child independently, thus enabling skills transference and parent empowerment.

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

The conceptual framework of this intervention is based on well established evidence that the quality of the parent–child relationship is important for children's psychological wellbeing [26]. The mother's HIV infection, and her lack of openness with the child about it, especially in HIV-endemic regions, can lead to psychological stress. By not disclosing, the mother practices a form of avoidant/passive coping, whereby stress related to the parental HIV infection is reduced through distancing from the problem, often motivated by a desire to safeguard children from psychological distress. Parents may have concerns about stigma and fear that the child may disclose to others. Even if children are not explicitly informed, they are often aware from their parents’ mood or behaviour that something is wrong, or that their parents have concerns that they are not conveying [27,28]. Thus, they may blame themselves, internalize their emotions or exhibit behavioural difficulties [29]. This in turn increases pressure on the parenting role, at a time when HIV illness and other disease-related stressors are common. The intervention supports mothers to address these challenges within the parent–child relationship and strengthens the family and healthcare support network around mother and child (see Fig. 1). The intervention shifts maternal parenting behaviours to an active coping style, provides training for disclosure, facilitates health promotion and custody planning, and trains mothers to use play to increase communication with their children. By dealing with HIV directly, the mother experiences improved mental health, lowered parenting stress and children experience less psychological distress. Through play for communication [Play for communication is adapted, with permission, from the Play for Communication Training Module designed by Dlandlanathi (], the quality of the parent–child relationship is strengthened.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Counsellor selection, training and supervision

The intervention was delivered by female and male lay-counsellors, all high school graduates with several years’ experience as counsellors. The 2-week training used a standardized Amagugu training manual and video, including practical exercises and competency testing. Counsellors were seen fortnightly for supervision and managed between 15 and 25 families concurrently.

Back to Top | Article Outline


This was a pre and post-intervention evaluation. Amagugu was initially tested in a small pilot study (24 families) and found to be acceptable [20]. However, there were few data available to inform larger-scale feasibility and acceptability issues, and potential risks associated with a disclosure intervention in a rural African HIV epidemic setting. A non-experimental evaluation design was chosen to explore whether this intervention approach was feasible, acceptable and increased rates of disclosure, and to examine factors associated with disclosure in the local context, prior to designing a randomized controlled trial. The design followed the guidelines for complex interventions [30] using validated measures, including multiple data collection points, and qualitative data, to inform the development of a randomized controlled trial protocol (currently underway R01HD07426-01).

Back to Top | Article Outline


Amagugu enrolled a nested sub-sample of eligible families, all of whom had previously been part of the Africa Centre Vertical Transmission Study (VTS) [31], a large prospective HIV and infant feeding study conducted between 2001 and 2006 [32]. Women were included in the Amagugu sub-sample if they were known to be HIV-infected with an HIV-negative child at the end of VTS (see Fig. 2). VTS mothers had tested for HIV during pregnancy, received antenatal and postnatal counselling, were assessed for 2 years postnatal and consented to be recontacted for future studies. Inclusion criteria for Amagugu further required that the VTS child was HIV-uninfected and aged 6–10 years at enrolment; mother and child were in reasonable physical and mental health; mother was living in the study area with her child, and if migrant, resident with the child for at least two nights per week, to ensure adequate support during the disclosure period. Written informed consent from mothers and assent from children was obtained. The Biomedical Ethics Committee of the University of KwaZulu-Natal (BF 144/010) gave ethics approval.

Fig. 2

Fig. 2

Back to Top | Article Outline

Outcome measures

The primary outcome of the original intervention study was disclosure (full/partial/none). On the basis of guidance in the literature [14], HIV disclosure was defined as ‘full’ if the mother used the words HIV, or ‘partial’ if she described being infected with a virus, without naming HIV. Psychological outcomes included maternal psychological functioning, parenting stress and child emotional and behavioural functioning.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Maternal psychological functioning

Maternal psychological functioning was measured using the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) [33], consisting of 12 items covering the past 4 weeks, using a four-point scale (from 0 to 3). Although the scale measures depression, anxiety and social dysfunction, there is consensus that it is a unidimensional measure of psychological functioning [34]. The GHQ is not a diagnostic instrument but is used more as a screening tool.

The GHQ-12 can be scored using the GHQ weighted scoring method (0–0–1–1) [33] or the Likert weighted scoring (0–1–2–3) [35]. For this analysis, we used the Likert weighted scoring (0–1–2–3) to generate a total score ranging from 0 to 36, with higher scores indicating more psychological problems. This scoring approach is useful in research, providing a wider and smoother score distribution with which to assess severity [35,36]. The GHQ-12 has been used in Africa [37], with HIV-positive women in South Africa [38] and HIV-infected adults at the Africa Centre [39]. In this research, the GHQ-12 had good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha pre α = 0.84; post α = 0.88).

Recommended cut-offs differ widely by country; in a multicountry analysis of 5438 patients [35], using Likert weighted scoring, a threshold of at least 12 produced the best sensitivity (79%) and specificity (77%) against the gold standard. Some literature recommends a higher threshold (≥20) for research on disability or chronic disease [37,40]. In this analysis, main results are presented using mean scores, and we also provide binary results using both the lower (≥12) and higher threshold (≥20) to distinguish mild from more severe distress states, in particular, as this may be informative for future intervention development [41].

Back to Top | Article Outline

Parenting stress

Parenting stress was measured using the Parenting Stress Index, Short Form (PSI-36), a measure of stress related to parenting roles, designed for parents of children under 12 years of age [42]. It consists of 36 statements, scored 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree), and has three subscales of 12 items each:

  1. Parental Distress Subscale measures perceptions of parenting competence, conflict with the child's other parent, social support and depression.
  2. Parent-Child Dysfunction Interaction Subscale (P-CDI) measures the extent to which parent–child interactions are satisfying, whether the child is seen as a disappointment or the parent feels rejected by, or alienated from, the child.
  3. Difficult Child Subscale measures the extent to which the parent finds it hard to gain the child's cooperation and/or manage the child's behaviour.

Each sub-scale score ranges from 12 to 60; the PSI-36 Total Stress score is a composite score of the three sub-scales (scores range 36–180), with higher scores indicating higher parental stress [43]. The PSI-36 has been used widely internationally [44], with HIV-infected mothers in South Africa [38] and in the current research demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha pre α = 0.92; post α = 0.93).

Back to Top | Article Outline

Child emotional and behavioural disorders

Children's emotional and behavioural functioning was measured using the parent-reported Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) [45]. The CBCL is a widely used measure of children's emotional and behavioural problems, validated across multiple cultural settings [46]. The researchers were granted a translation license (#512-10-29-10) and the CBCL was translated, back translated and approved by the test developers.

In this analysis, CBCL scores were normed using the multicultural rating-to-score (RTS) norming software [47] developed by the authors of the CBCL, which produce normed t-scores for the total score, internalizing and externalizing sub-scales and for six Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) childhood mental disorders. The CBCL has been used in South Africa [48], among HIV-affected populations [49], and achieved good reliability in the current research (Cronbach's alpha pre α = 0.94; post α = 0.92).

Back to Top | Article Outline

Data analysis

Data were analysed using SPSS version 21. Missing data for individual scales were found for 20 participants (7% of data) and were imputed using the mean series for the individual participant for that particular scale. All continuous variables met normality criteria (skewness ≤1.5). One-way repeated measures (analysis of covariances, ANCOVAs) were conducted to examine the effects of the intervention and the moderating effect of disclosure type on continuous scores of maternal psychological morbidity (GHQ), parenting stress (PSI) and children's emotional and behavioural disorders (CBCL). The effects of intervention on the percentage change on the GHQ (using low ≥12 and high ≥20 thresholds) were explored through Z-tests for differences between proportions. Characteristics potentially associated with higher maternal psychological morbidity and parenting stress continuous scores at pre test were examined using analysis of variances (ANOVAs). Using a theoretical model developed previously [19], we examined maternal age, education, employment, income, CD4+ cell count, HIV treatment status and hospitalization, and child age, sex, father involvement and prior hospitalizations.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Of an available pool of 525 VTS mothers, 136 (26%) were ineligible (death, relocation) and 14 (3%) were untraceable. Of the remaining 375 women approached to participate, 56 (15%) did not meet inclusion criteria (see Fig. 2 for reasons), while 28 (7%) refused and 291 (78%) enrolled. Amongst enrolees, 10 (3%) withdrew during the course of the study and 281 completed follow-up.

Data from a separate follow-up of VTS in 2013–2014 show that the 53 Amagugu nonparticipators (refusals and not available for participation, Fig. 2) were significantly more likely to be younger than participators (M 34.7 years; M 37.0 years, P = 0.003) although the mean difference was marginal. No other significant differences were found on maternal intelligence quotient (IQ), education, employment, relationship status, ART and child age or sex.

The majority of participating mothers (n = 281) had completed at least primary education, were on ART, had no regular income source, and were in a current partnership, many with a partner who was also HIV-positive (see Table 1).

Table 1

Table 1

Back to Top | Article Outline

Maternal psychological morbidity

Using mean scores, there was a significant moderate decrease in maternal psychological morbidity mean scores, measured by the GHQ (Table 2) post-intervention. Disclosure type did not moderate intervention effects significantly.

Table 2

Table 2

Using the at least 12 threshold [35], we investigated whether the intervention significantly decreased the number of mothers with elevated psychological morbidity. At baseline, 41.3% mothers scored above the threshold compared with 24.9% after the intervention. This decrease was significant (see Table 2) and consistent across disclosure types with rates decreasing amongst those who fully and partially disclosed. Using the ‘at least 20’ threshold [40], a similar pattern was observed, 17.8% of mothers preintervention, compared with 11.7% post-intervention. Moderation was not investigated for the high threshold because of small cell counts.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Parenting stress

Using continuous scores, PSI total mean scores postintervention were lower than pre-intervention (Table 3). This decrease was not significantly moderated by disclosure type. PSI sub-scales showed significant decreases from pre to post-intervention for the PSI-Parental Distress and the PSI Parent-Child sub-scales, with no significant disclosure type moderation, but no significant changes on the PSI-Difficult Child sub-scale.

Table 3

Table 3

Back to Top | Article Outline

Association between baseline characteristics, psychological functioning and parenting stress

As described in the Materials and methods section, maternal and child characteristics were investigated as predictors of maternal psychological functioning at baseline. Results revealed a significant effect of increased maternal age (r = 0.13, P = 0.026) and employment status on GHQ scores with unemployed mothers reporting higher scores [employed M = 9.73 (SD = 6.75); unemployed M = 12.10 (SD = 8.43); F(1, 276) = 5.40, P = 0.021, ŋ p 2 = 0.02]. Likewise, compared with those with no income, those with access to income had lower mental health risks [income M = 9.68 (8.11); no income M = 12.05 (8.05), F(1, 279) = 4.66, P = 0.032, n 2 = 0.02]. Mothers who were not in a relationship displayed higher scores than those in a relationship [relationship M = 10.95 (SD = 7.76), no relationship M = 13.79 (SD = 9.40); F(1, 279) = 4.94, P = 0.027, ŋ p 2 = 0.02], and scores of mothers who were on ART were significantly higher than those of mothers not on ART [on ART M = 13.69 (SD = 8.51), not on ART M = 9.58 (SD = 7.46); F(1271) = 18.03, P < 0.001, ŋ p 2 = 0.06]. No child characteristics were significantly associated with maternal psychological functioning, although child hospitalization in the past 12 months showed borderline significance [Hospitalization M = 13.30 (9.24), no hospitalization M = 10.75 (7.66), P = 0.054].

For parenting stress, maternal education had a significant effect on PSI scores [F(3, 274) = 3.08, P = 0.028, ŋ p 2 = 0.03]. Posthoc analyses revealed that mothers with no education or education only to primary school level (M = 83.15, SD = 22.03) reported higher levels of stress (P = 0.010) than those who completed some or all secondary schooling (M = 76.11, SD = 20.36). Unemployment was related to higher stress scores [F(1276) = 6.57, P = 0.01, ŋ p 2 = 0.02; employed M = 74.81 (SD = 21.01), not employed M = 81.78 (SD = 21.31)].

Back to Top | Article Outline

Child psychological functioning

As summarized in Table 4, a marked effect size was observed in the CBCL standardized total score. The magnitude of effects observed in the internalizing and externalizing sub-scales was comparable. Significant decreases were observed across all CBCL scales with children showing 2–4 points decrease in the DSM-orientated sub-scales. The strongest observed effects were on the Conduct and Oppositional DSM sub-scales, although the effects were smallest on the Attention Hyperactivity Deficient Disorder (ADHD) sub-scale. None of these effects were moderated by disclosure type.

Table 4

Table 4

Back to Top | Article Outline


HIV-infected mothers, living in low-resource settings with a limited access to support and services [50], face multiple challenges coping with the stress of caring for their children and living with a chronic, potentially life-threatening disease [51]. In this research, mothers who were unemployed with no access to regular income, not in a partnership, and not on ART had higher mental health risks at baseline. Increasing evidence suggests that adults living with HIV are vulnerable to mental health difficulties [52] that impact on their health outcomes [53] and their ability to care for their children [10,54]. Similarly, parents with chronic health problems, such as HIV, have been shown to have higher levels of parenting stress, which affects their parenting capacity [55,56]. There is an urgent need for culturally acceptable, scalable, low-intensity psychosocial support interventions for this growing population of parents in Africa.

The intervention resulted in high rates of disclosure, and also resulted in significant decreases in maternal and child psychological morbidity and parenting stress. This is important, as avoidant coping has been shown to play a negative role in parenting in other research in South Africa [56] and could impact negatively on adherence behaviours. It is plausible that the decreases in parenting stress may be linked to increases in disclosure, and the concomitant decreases in avoidant coping.

The link between parental mental health, parenting behaviours and child outcomes is well established [57,58], with children of depressed, anxious or highly stressed mothers known to be at an increased risk of psychological, educational and behavioural problems [56,59,60]. Our findings demonstrate significant overall improvements in maternal psychological functioning, as measured by the GHQ, with mean scores decreasing substantially pre-post regardless of disclosure level. This is an important finding, not only because of established benefits for children but also because improvements in mental health symptoms have been shown to have a significant impact on improved HIV treatment adherence [61].

It is of interest that the intervention effect on maternal mental health appeared to be stronger for women who scored above the GHQ threshold of at least 12, than for those at the higher threshold (≥20) at baseline. Although the women with high levels of psychological morbidity do show improvements, it is likely that they require therapeutic interventions that Amagugu did not provide because it is not designed as treatment for clinical depression or anxiety, for which more established therapeutic interventions exist [62,63]. This is important given recent calls to advance intervention science through a better understanding of the distinction between milder distress states (which can be successfully addressed through low-intensity psychosocial support models delivered by lay professionals, such as Amagugu) from probable clinical level distress requiring specialist healthcare interventions [41].

A recent systematic review on HIV-affected children [10] found that preadolescent children affected by HIV were at an increased risk of internalizing and externalizing problems, noting however that almost no research has been conducted with primary school aged children in Africa, and highlighting the scarcity of interventions that may ameliorate these effects for HIV-affected children in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Therefore, our finding that the intervention had significant positive effects on children's psychological wellbeing suggests that this age group can benefit from these kinds of intervention.

Although the mean CBCL scores were below the clinical threshold at baseline, there were significant reductions following intervention. Improvements were most substantial on oppositional and conduct disorders and there was a considerable improvement on somatic scores. In other LMIC settings, somatization has been associated with later depression and anxiety in children [64,65], and in Europe and the United States, early conduct problems predict poor behaviour and educational outcomes in adolescents and adults [66]; hence, improvements in these domains may have preventive benefits for children.

Notably, within the Parenting Stress Index, although parental distress and the parent–child relationship were significantly improved, parental perceptions of their child being difficult were not. Another parenting intervention in South Africa has also found that aspects of parental stress persist despite improvements in parental reports of children's behaviour [56]. More sociocultural research is needed to better understand parent perceptions of children's difficult behaviours, although factors associated with parenting stress at baseline (low education, unemployment) are similar to those in the literature [67]. Parents who find it difficult to gain their child's cooperation may require education on behavioural techniques [68], which fall outside the scope of Amagugu.

The positive effects on children's psychological functioning were not moderated by the extent of disclosure, suggesting that the intervention had positive nonspecific effects on family relationships and communication. Engaging family support around parental responsibilities and offering encouragement of the important role HIV-infected parents play in their children's lives likely contributed to such improvements, as has been demonstrated in other family strengthening intervention research in Africa [69].

Lastly, the finding that Amagugu had a positive impact on both the primary outcome (maternal disclosure) and secondary intervention targets is important for two reasons: interventions targeting parental disclosure as an isolated endpoint are unlikely to be cost-effective at scale; and improving rates of disclosure without improvements in family functioning, principally parenting and parent/mother and child mental health, is unlikely to be worthwhile. Our findings from this nonexperimental intervention are broadly in line with mental health benefits of interventions tested in HIC [18] and to higher intensity interventions that aimed to build resilience in children of HIV- infected parents in low-resource settings [70]. Mental health interventions, which do not directly help parents to deal with HIV disclosure to their children, may have disadvantages within the family context [71–73], particularly in HIV endemic regions.

Limitations of this research include that data were mother-reported; however, young children do not report reliably on their psychological symptoms, and further, it was deemed too sensitive to question the children directly, and thus adult report was used. Maternal psychological morbidity may influence mothers’ reports, although there is little evidence to support this in the literature [74,75]. The main limitation is that this evaluation had no control group, hence although the changes in maternal and child mental health are plausibly attributed to the intervention, this needs to be formally tested using a randomized controlled design.

This intervention used a relatively low-intensity lay-counsellor approach feasible for scale-up in low-resource settings, which led to increased disclosure and improved mental health. If these results are replicated in a randomized controlled trial, Amagugu could provide a sustainable home-based intervention targeting families with young HIV-exposed children.

Back to Top | Article Outline


We are grateful to all the mothers who generously participated in this study, to the study staff (Samukelisiwe Dube, Bonakele Gumede, Philani Sithole, Hlengiwe Mtolo) whose hard work made this all possible, data entry staff (Zanele Msane, Zodwa) and data extraction team (Siyabonga Nxumalo, Dickman Gareta).

The study was generously funded by the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA) (Grant No: ZA/A033520/3/8). Tamsen Rochat received salary support from CIDA and the Wellcome Trust. The Africa Centre is funded by the Wellcome Trust (Grant No: 097410/Z/11/Z).

Tamsen Rochat and Ruth Bland contributed to the design, acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data, drafted and critically revised the manuscript. Adriane X. Arteche and Alan Stein contributed to the analysis and interpretation of data, drafted and critically revised the manuscript. Joanie Mitchell contributed to the coding and analysis of data, the interpretation of data, and critically revised the manuscript.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Back to Top | Article Outline


1. Bor J, Herbst AJ, Newell M-L, Bärnighausen T. Increases in adult life expectancy in rural South Africa: valuing the scale-up of HIV treatment. Science 2013; 339:961–965.
2. Tanser F, Bärnighausen T, Grapsa E, Zaidi J, Newell M-L. High coverage of ART associated with decline in risk of HIV acquisition in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Science 2013; 339:966–971.
3. McNally LM, Hadingham J, Archary D, Moodley R, Coovadia HM. HIV-exposed but uninfected children: why are they vulnerable?. Vulnerable Child Youth Stud 2006; 1:139–148.
4. Filteau S. The HIV-exposed, uninfected african child. Trop Med Int Health 2009; 14:276–287.
5. Rochat TJ, Bland R, Coovadia H, Stein A, Newell M-L. Towards a family-centered approach to HIV treatment and care for HIV-exposed children, their mothers and their families in poorly resourced settings. Future Virol 2011; 6:687–696.
6. UNAIDS. Global report: UNAIDS report on the global AIDS epidemic. Geneva: UNAIDS; 2013.
7. Granich RM, Gilks CF, Dye C, De Cock KM, Williams BG. Universal voluntary HIV testing with immediate antiretroviral therapy as a strategy for elimination of HIV transmission: a mathematical model. Lancet 2009; 373:48–57.
8. Hosegood V. The demographic impact of HIV and AIDS across the family and household life-cycle: implications for efforts to strengthen families in sub-Saharan Africa. AIDS Care 2009; 21:13–21.
9. Richter L. An introduction to family-centred services for children affected by HIV and AIDS. J Int AIDS Soc 2010; 13 (Suppl 2):1–6.
10. Sherr L, Cluver L, Betancourt T, Kellerman S, Richter L, Desmond C. Evidence of impact: health, psychological and social effects of adult HIV on children. AIDS 2014; 28 (Suppl 3):251–259.
11. WHOGuideline on HIV disclosure counselling for children up to 12 years of age. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2011.
12. Hawk ST. Disclosures of maternal HIV infection to seronegative children: a literature review. J Soc Pers Relat 2007; 24:657–673.
13. Murphy DA. HIV-positive mothers’ disclosure of their serostatus to their young children: a review. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry 2008; 13:105–122.
14. Qiao S, Li X, Stanton B. Disclosure of parental HIV infection to children: a systematic review of global literature. AIDS Behav 2013; 17:369–389.
15. Mkwanazi NB, Rochat TJ, Imrie J, Bland RM. Disclosure of maternal HIV status to children: considerations for research and practice in sub-Saharan Africa. Future Virol 2012; 7:1159–1182.
16. Krauss BJ, Letteney S, De Baets AJ, Baggaley R, Okero FA. Caregiver's HIV disclosure to children 12 years and under: a review and analysis of the evidence. AIDS Care 2013; 25:415–429.
17. Bor J, Bärnighausen T, Newell C, Tanser F, Newell M-L. Social exposure to an antiretroviral treatment programme in rural KwaZulu-Natal. Trop Med Int Health 2011; 16:988–994.
18. Murphy DA, Armistead L, Marelich WD, Payne DL, Herbeck DM. Pilot trial of a disclosure intervention for HIV+ mothers: the TRACK program. J Consult Clin Psych 2011; 79:203–214.
19. Rochat TJ, Arteche AX, Stein A, Mkwanazi N, Bland RM. Maternal HIV disclosure to young HIV-uninfected children: an evaluation of a family-centred intervention in South Africa. AIDS 2014; 28 (Suppl 3):331–341.
20. Rochat TJ, Mkwanazi N, Bland R. Maternal HIV disclosure to HIV-uninfected children in rural South Africa: a pilot study of a family-based intervention. BMC Public Health 2013; 13:147.
21. Bärnighausen T, Tanser F, Newell M-L. Lack of a decline in HIV incidence in a rural community with high HIV prevalence in South Africa, 2003–2007. AIDS Res Hum Retrov 2009; 25:405–409.
22. Zaidi J, Grapsa E, Tanser F, Newell M-L, Bärnighausen T. Dramatic increase in HIV prevalence after scale-up of antiretroviral treatment. AIDS 2013; 27:2301–2305.
23. Houlihan CF, Bland RM, Mutevedzi PC, Lessells RJ, Ndirangu J, Thulare H, et al. Cohort profile: Hlabisa HIV treatment and care programme. Int J Epidemiol 2011; 40:318–326.
24. Tanser F, Bärnighausen T, Grapsa E, Zaidi J, Newell M-L. High coverage of ART associated with decline in risk of HIV acquisition in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Science 2013; 339:966–971.
25. Ndirangu J, Newell M-L, Tanser F, Herbst AJ, Bland R. Decline in early life mortality in a high HIV prevalence rural area of South Africa: evidence of HIV prevention or treatment impact?. AIDS 2010; 24:593–602.
26. Stein A, Pearson RM, Goodman SH, Rapa E, Rahman A, McCallum M, et al. Effects of perinatal mental disorders on the fetus and child. The Lancet 2014; 384:1800–1819.
27. Saldinger A, Cain AC, Porterfield K, Lohnes K. Facilitating attachment between school-aged children and a dying parent. Death Stud 2004; 28:915–940.
28. Forrest G, Plumb C, Ziebland S, Stein A. Breast cancer in the family – children's perceptions of their mother's cancer and its initial treatment: qualitative study. BMJ 2006; 332:998–1003.
29. Stein A, Ramchandani P, Murray L. Rutter M, Bishop D, Pine D, Scott S, Stevenson J, Taylor E, Thapar A. Impact of parental psychiatric disorder and physical illness. Rutter's Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 5th ed.Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2008. 407–420.
30. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2008; 337:1655.
31. Bland R, Coovadia H, Coutsoudis A, Rollins N, Newell M. Cohort profile: mamanengane or the Africa centre vertical transmission study. Int J Epidemiol 2010; 39:351–360.
32. Coovadia HM, Rollins NC, Bland RM, Little K, Coutsoudis A, Bennish ML, et al. Mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1 infection during exclusive breastfeeding in the first 6 months of life: an intervention cohort study. Lancet 2007; 369:1107–1116.
33. Goldberg DP, Hillier VF. A scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire. Psychol Med 1979; 9:139–145.
34. Gao F, Luo N, Thumboo J, Fones C, Li S-C, Cheung Y-B. Does the 12-item General Health Questionnaire contain multiple factors and do we need them?. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2004; 2:63.
35. Goldberg DP, Gater R, Sartorius N, Ustun T, Piccinelli M, Gureje O, et al. The validity of two versions of the GHQ in the WHO study of mental illness in general healthcare. Psychol Med 1997; 27:191–197.
36. Martin A, Rief W, Klaiberg A, Braehler E. Validity of the brief patient health questionnaire mood scale (PHQ-9) in the general population. General Hosp Psychiat 2006; 28:71–77.
37. Goldberg D. The value of screening in patient populations with high prevalence of a disorder. BMC Med 2014; 12:14.
38. Richter L, Rotheram-Borus MJ, Van Heerden A, Stein A, Tomlinson M, Harwood JM, et al. Pregnant women living with HIV (WLH) supported at clinics by peer WLH: a cluster randomized controlled trial. AIDS Behav 2014; 18:706–715.
39. Yeji F, Klipstein-Grobusch K, Newell M-L, Hirschhorn LR, Hosegood V, Bärnighausen T. Are social support and HIV coping strategies associated with lower depression in adults on antiretroviral treatment? Evidence from rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. AIDS Care 2014; 26:1482–1489.
40. Cornelius BL, Groothoff JW, van der Klink JJ, Brouwer S. The performance of the K10, K6 and GHQ-12 to screen for present state DSM-IV disorders among disability claimants. BMC Public Health 2013; 13:128.
41. Patel V. Rethinking mental healthcare: bridging the credibility gap. Intervention 2014; 12:15–20.
42. Abidin R. Manual for the parenting stress index. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1995.
43. Haskett ME, Ahern LS, Ward CS, Allaire JC. Factor structure and validity of the parenting stress index-short form. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 2006; 35:302–312.
44. Pritchett R, Kemp J, Wilson P, Minnis H, Bryce G, Gillberg C. Quick, simple measures of family relationships for use in clinical practice and research. A systematic review. Family Prac 2011; 28:172–187.
45. Achenbach TM, Edelbrock CS. Manual for the child behavior checklist and revised child behavior profile. Burlington, VT: T.M. Achenbach; 1983.
46. Rescorla L, Achenbach T, Ivanova MY, Dumenci L, Almqvist F, Bilenberg N, et al. Behavioral and emotional problems reported by parents of children ages 6 to 16 in 31 societies. J Emot Behav Disord 2007; 15:130–142.
47. Achenbach TM, Becker A, Döpfner M, Heiervang E, Roessner V, Steinhausen HC, et al. Multicultural assessment of child and adolescent psychopathology with ASEBA and SDQ instruments: research findings, applications, and future directions. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2008; 49:251–275.
48. Sabet F, Richter LM, Ramchandani PG, Stein A, Quigley MA, Norris SA. Low birthweight and subsequent emotional and behavioural outcomes in 12-year-old children in Soweto, South Africa: findings from birth to twenty. Int J Epidemiol 2009; 38:944–954.
49. Cluver L, Gardner F, Operario D. Psychological distress amongst AIDS-orphaned children in urban South Africa. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2007; 48:755–763.
50. Burgess R, Campbell C. Contextualising women's mental distress and coping strategies in the time of AIDS: a rural South African case study. Transcult Psychiatry 2014; 51:875–903.
51. Blais M, Fernet M, Proulx-Boucher K, Lapointe N, Samson J, Otis J, et al. Family quality of life in families affected by HIV: the perspective of HIV-positive mothers. AIDS Care 2014; 26 (Suppl 1):1–8.
52. Chibanda D, Benjamin L, Weiss HA, Abas M. Mental, neurological, and substance use disorders in people living with HIV/AIDS in low-and middle-income countries. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2014; 67 (Suppl 1):54–67.
53. Mayston R, Kinyanda E, Chishinga N, Prince M, Patel V. Mental disorder and the outcome of HIV/AIDS in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review. AIDS 2012; 26 (Suppl 2):117–135.
54. Lachman JM, Cluver LD, Boyes ME, Kuo C, Casale M. Positive parenting for positive parents: HIV/AIDS, poverty, caregiver depression, child behavior, and parenting in South Africa. AIDS Care 2014; 26:304–313.
55. Murphy DA, Marelich WD, Armistead L, Herbeck DM, Payne DL. Anxiety/stress among mothers living with HIV: effects on parenting skills and child outcomes. AIDS Care 2010; 22:1449–1458.
56. Allen AB, Finestone M, Eloff I, Sipsma H, Makin J, Triplett K, et al. The role of parenting in affecting the behavior and adaptive functioning of young children of HIV-infected mothers in South Africa. AIDS Behav 2014; 18:605–616.
57. Hoffman C, Crnic KA, Baker JK. Maternal depression and parenting: implications for children's emergent emotion regulation and behavioral functioning. Parent Sci Pract 2006; 6:271–295.
58. Dix T, Meunier LN. Depressive symptoms and parenting competence: an analysis of 13 regulatory processes. Dev Rev 2009; 29:45–68.
59. Stein A, Desmond C, Garbarino J, Van I, Jzendoorn MH, Barbarin O, Black MM, et al. Predicting long-term outcomes for children affected by HIV and AIDS: perspectives from the scientific study of children's development. AIDS 2014; 28 (Suppl 3):261–268.
60. Verkuijl NE, Richter L, Norris SA, Stein A, Avan B, Ramchandani PG. Postnatal depressive symptoms and child psychological development at 10 years: a prospective study of longitudinal data from the South African Birth to Twenty cohort. Lancet Psychiatry 2014; 1:454–460.
61. Sin NL, DiMatteo MR. Depression treatment enhances adherence to antiretroviral therapy: a meta-analysis. Ann Behav Med 2014; 47:259–269.
62. Patel V, Chowdhary N, Rahman A, Verdeli H. Improving access to psychological treatments: lessons from developing countries. Behav Res Ther 2011; 49:523–528.
63. Chowdhary N, Jotheeswaran A, Nadkarni A, Hollon S, King M, Jordans M, et al. The methods and outcomes of cultural adaptations of psychological treatments for depressive disorders: a systematic review. Psychol Med 2014; 44:1131–1146.
64. Weiss B, Dang M, Trung L, Nguyen MC, Thuy NTH, Pollack A. A nationally representative epidemiological and risk factor assessment of child mental health in vietnam. Int Perspect Psychol 2014; 3:139–153.
65. Imran N, Ani C, Mahmood Z, Hassan KA, Bhatti MR. Anxiety and depression predicted by medically unexplained symptoms in Pakistani children: a case-control study. J Psychosom Res 2014; 76:105–112.
66. Kieling C, Baker-Henningham H, Belfer M, Conti G, Ertem I, Omigbodun O, et al. Child and adolescent mental health worldwide: evidence for action. Lancet 2011; 378:1515–1525.
67. Solem MB, Christophersen KA, Martinussen M. Predicting parenting stress: children's behavioural problems and parents’ coping. Infant Child Dev 2011; 20:162–180.
68. Knerr W, Gardner F, Cluver L. Improving positive parenting skills and reducing harsh and abusive parenting in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Prev Sci 2013; 14:352–363.
69. Betancourt TS, Ng LC, Kirk CM, Munyanah M, Mushashi C, Ingabire C, et al. Family-based prevention of mental health problems in children affected by HIV and AIDS: an open trial. AIDS 2014; 28 (Suppl 3):359–368.
70. Eloff I, Finestone M, Makin JD, Boeving-Allen A, Visser M, Ebersöhn L, et al. A randomized clinical trial of an intervention to promote resilience in young children of HIV-positive mothers in South Africa. AIDS 2014; 28 (Suppl 3):347–357.
71. Kennedy C, McIntyre R, Worth A, Hogg R. Supporting children and families facing death of a parent: part 2. Int J Palliat Nurs 2008; 14:230–237.
72. Kennedy C, McIntyre R, Worth A, Hogg R. Supporting children and families facing death of a parent: part 1. Int J Palliat Nurs 2008; 14:162–168.
73. Kennedy DP, Cowgill BO, Bogart LM, Corona R, Ryan GW, Murphy DA, et al. Parents’ disclosure of their HIV infection to their children in the context of the family. AIDS Behav 2010; 14:1095–1105.
74. Maoz H, Goldstein T, Goldstein BI, Axelson DA, Fan J, Hickey MB, et al. The effects of parental mood on reports of their children's psychopathology. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2014; 53:1111–1122.
75. Achenbach TM. Commentary: definitely more than measurement error: but how should we understand and deal with informant discrepancies?. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 2011; 40:80–86.

Africa; children; HIV disclosure; psychological; rural

Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.