Secondary Logo

Growing-up just like everyone else: key components of a successful pediatric HIV disclosure intervention in Namibia

Brandt, Lauraa; Beima-Sofie, Kristinb; Hamunime, Ndapewac; Shepard, Marka; Ferris, Larissaa; Ingo, Paulinaa; John-Stewart, Graceb,d,e,f; O’Malley, Gabrielleb

doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000000667

Objectives: To facilitate replication and adaptation of pediatric HIV disclosure interventions, we identified key components of a child-friendly cartoon book used to guide Namibian caregivers and healthcare workers (HCWs) through a gradual, structured disclosure process.

Design: Qualitative interviews were conducted with caregivers and HCWs from four high-volume pediatric HIV clinics in Namibia.

Methods: Semi-structured in-depth interviews with 35 HCWs and 64 caregivers of HIV+ children aged 7–15 were analyzed using constant comparative and modified grounded theory analysis. Major barriers to disclosure were compared to accounts of intervention success, and themes related to key components were identified.

Results: The disclosure book overcomes barriers to disclosure by reducing caregiver resistance, increasing HIV and disclosure knowledge, and providing a gradual, structured framework for disclosure. The delayed mention of HIV-specific terminology overcomes caregiver fears associated with HIV stigma, thus encouraging earlier uptake of disclosure initiation. Caregivers value the book's focus on staying healthy, keeping the body strong, and having a future ‘like other kids’, thus capitalizing on evidence of the positive benefits of resilience and hopefulness rather than the negative consequences of HIV. The book's concepts and images resonate with children who readily adopt the language of ‘body soldiers’ and ‘bad guys’ in describing how important it is for them to take their medicine. Discussion cues ease communication between HCWs, caregivers, and pediatric patients.

Conclusion: Given the urgent need for available pediatric HIV disclosure interventions, easily implementable tools like the Namibian disclosure book should be evaluated for utility in similar settings.

aInternational Training and Education Center for Health, Namibia

bDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington

cMinistry of Health and Social Services, Namibia

dDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington

eDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Washington

fDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Washington.

Correspondence to Gabrielle O’Malley, 901 Boren, Suite 1100, Seattle, WA 98105, USA. E-mail:

Received 12 March, 2015

Revised 13 March, 2015

Accepted 13 March, 2015

Back to Top | Article Outline


Despite WHO recommendations that HIV-infected school-aged children be fully informed of their HIV diagnosis, disclosure rates in sub-Saharan Africa remain extremely low [1–3]. Although healthcare workers (HCWs) and caregivers believe disclosure to be important, significant barriers prevent or delay disclosure from occurring in practice. Caregivers are reluctant to disclose because they lack knowledge about how to discuss HIV, have guilt regarding transmission, worry about the child's possible negative reactions or questions the child may ask, or are concerned with HIV stigma [1,4–10]. In addition, many high-volume pediatric HIV clinics do not have dedicated resources or systematic processes for disclosure, affecting HCW confidence and ability to reliably perform or facilitate parent-led disclosure counseling [10–12]. Nondisclosure has been shown to be associated with lower adherence, poorer psychological adjustment, and increased morbidity [1,13–19]. In addition, delayed disclosure increases the likelihood that the child will learn his/her status accidentally or in an emotionally traumatic way [10,17,20,21], or that the child will maintain a false understanding of illness, including the belief that he/she will be cured [21].

Few studies present disclosure interventions being used in practice and there are currently no published results from randomized control trials testing effects of pediatric HIV disclosure interventions [11,20,22,23]. In addition, cross-sectional and longitudinal studies evaluating health outcomes in children following disclosure interventions are minimal [12]. Programmatic evaluations of pediatric disclosure interventions are too few to generate empirically-based best practices through comparative analysis. Yet, the dangers of delaying disclosure to children necessitate widespread implementation of support programs while evidence accrues.

A lack of child disclosure interventions prompted the Namibian Ministry of Health and Social Services (MOHSS) to develop an intervention aimed at improving the number of children who knew their status, children's understanding of HIV and antiretroviral medication adherence. In addition, the intervention aimed to make the disclosure process easier for caregivers, and to facilitate discussions between HCWs, caregivers, and pediatric patients with HIV. The intervention was developed in collaboration with HCWs in busy HIV clinics in Namibia and responded to recommendations in the literature to develop resources that support disclosure as an ongoing process [8,24–26]. The intervention addresses barriers to disclosure and supports primary caregivers and HCWs in a structured disclosure process that includes assessing caregiver and child readiness for disclosure, and guiding children and their caregivers through the disclosure process. The centerpiece of the intervention is a colorful, child-friendly cartoon book organized into five chapters (Fig. 1). Chapter 1 describes how medicines keep ‘body soldiers’ strong and protect the child from getting sick, so he can grow up to be a successful adult. Chapter 2 describes the ‘bad guy’ who can make them sick by attacking their body soldiers. Chapter 3 describes the importance of taking medicine regularly to keep the ‘bad guys’ asleep and thus allow the body soldiers to be strong and numerous. Chapter 4 describes how the ‘bad guy’ can wake up if medicines are not taken correctly. Chapter 5 leads to full disclosure by explaining that the ‘bad guy’ is named HIV, that ‘body soldiers’ are CD4 cells, and the medicines are called antiretrovirals. The book contains prompts to assist HCWs in assessing the child's comprehension and emotional readiness to move to the next chapter, and eventually for full disclosure. The number of months or years spent reviewing chapters varies with the child's age and understanding. The intervention has been integrated into routine outpatient HIV care country-wide and is targeted to begin at age 6 with a goal of achieving full disclosure by age 10.

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

Understanding how and why existing interventions work is critical for replicating and adapting them to other settings with high pediatric HIV prevalence [12,23,27–32]. An evaluation of the Namibian disclosure intervention in 2013 provided a detailed description of multiple components of the intervention implementation, demonstrated its success in supporting HCWs, caregivers and children with HIV in the disclosure process, and found that it was also perceived to improve children's adherence [33]. This study explicitly evaluates the cartoon book's facilitation in overcoming specific barriers to pediatric HIV disclosure. We then identify implicit theories underlying the book's success.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Study design and population

We performed a cross-sectional evaluation of the disclosure intervention at four of the highest volume pediatric HIV clinics in Namibia: Onandjokwe, Oshakati, Engela, and Katutura [33]. All HCWs providing pediatric HIV outpatient services were interviewed, including doctors (9), nurses (17), and community counselors (9). HCWs reported having between 2 and 9 years of experience at their respective clinics. Purposive sampling was used to interview 16 caregivers per site (N = 64) to reach phenomenal variation and informational redundancy related to the disclosure experience [34]. Caregivers were recruited at the clinic during pediatric outpatient days. Patient charts were pre-screened on the day of clinic visit and caregivers of patients aged 7–15 were flagged and recruitment proceeded sequentially. Caregivers were at least 18 years of age and accompanied by an HIV-positive child on antiretroviral therapy (ART) to clinic that day. Caregivers were mostly the biological mother (59%) or aunt (21%) of the child. At the time of the interview, caregivers reported that approximately half of the children knew their status (54%).

The evaluation protocol was approved by the Namibian MOHSS ethics review committee. Because the intervention is implemented nationally as part of the routine pediatric patient care, the University of Washington Institutional Review Board determined that the evaluation was not human subjects research. Both HCWs and caregivers provided written informed consent for the interview.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Data collection

During May and June of 2013, semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted exploring the nuances and depth of opinions and experiences with pediatric HIV disclosure in general, and with the HIV disclosure intervention components in particular. Interviews were conducted in English or Oshivambo, depending on the interviewee preference. All interviews were digitally recorded and later translated (if applicable) and transcribed.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Data analyses

Initial codes were applied independently by three investigators to a subset of transcripts, and additional codes were created when new themes emerged. Coded transcripts were compared and differences were discussed and resolved. Investigators then independently coded a portion of the transcripts and reviewed and second-coded transcripts initially coded by other investigators so that all transcripts were coded by at least two investigators. Disagreements with codes were noted and resolved in group discussions [35–37].

A second coding process was then undertaken by two investigators to more specifically understand ‘how’ the cartoon book influenced HCW and caregiver willingness and capacity to engage in the disclosure process. First, scientific literature was reviewed to identify common barriers preventing or delaying disclosure (Fig. 2 ). Second, a constant comparative approach was used to identify whether these barriers were also identified by the Namibian population and whether any novel barriers emerged. Data were synthesized to generate a graphical representation of the common barriers to disclosure (Fig. 3). On the basis of this graphical representation, additional codes were developed that identified whether and how the cartoon book addressed specifically identified barriers. An inductive approach was used to identify themes and patterns emerging from the data relevant to the key components of success. Specifically, we sought to identify important facility contexts, perceived intervention effects, and motivations of caregivers and HCWs to engage in the disclosure process that might moderate uptake of the intervention. Concordance between HCW and caregiver (CG) views was also analyzed. Findings were contextualized within the health communication, resilience, and implementation science literature.

Fig. 2

Fig. 2

Fig. 2

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 3

Back to Top | Article Outline


The disclosure cartoon book is a communication tool that successfully addressed disclosure barriers in four health facilities in Namibia by addressing child, caregiver, and HCW barriers to disclosure (Fig. 2 ). Barriers identified in the literature [1,4–12,21] were explicitly mentioned in interviews with HCWs and caregivers in Namibia. In addition, one novel barrier – inconsistent caregivers accompanying the child to clinic visits – was mentioned by HCWs as a significant challenge to disclosure initiation. Barriers were grouped under three broad categories, including: caregiver resistance to disclosure, lack of knowledge about HIV and how to talk with children about their HIV status, and a lack of specialized staff (psychologists, social workers) and resources to address sensitive disclosure issues. The disclosure book specifically overcomes these barriers to disclosure by: allaying fears of stigma and psychological harm, using accessible and acceptable language, and being easy to implement in low-resource settings.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Allays fears of stigma and psychological harm by focusing on medication use to keep body strong rather than HIV disease

The disclosure book was perceived to reduce caregiver resistance to disclosure by targeting health behavior (i.e. taking medicine), rather than focusing on a highly stigmatized disease. The focus on medication behavior reduces caregiver fears of potential psychological harm and negative child reactions.

When you ask those [resistant caregivers], ‘Does your child know why she or he is taking medication, do you want us to tell the child?’ they used to say ‘no,’ but now when you bring in that book, you tell them at first we are not going to talk about HIV, everyone says I like that kind of book, so really they are appreciating that. P44: HCW

Caregivers appreciated how the book normalizes taking medicine and frames disclosure as a hopeful, future-oriented process that supports the child to become a normal, healthy, successful adult.

[Taking ARVs] is not a problem because it's the same as taking any other medication. But, ….because the ART ones are taken for the rest of someone's life then it must be explained to the child that they should take medication in order for them to grow and also to be able to complete school like other children and get a job so you can buy and drive a car of your own one day. That will help the child to take medication correctly until he reaches a stage where he understands what the medication is for. P38: mother of 8-year-old boy

The HCWs had similar perspectives on the importance of a future-oriented approach.

[The book is] Very helpful…kids… easily forget why they are taking medications … and decide not to, but if you bring in the book, you will see that it will come back to them that yes, I have to drink my medication and like that book you will see there is a picture of when you grow up, what do you want to do? You know they get so excited, so they say I have to go to school, I have to play with my friends, I want to be a teacher, whatever, that is when they will decide, ok, I will drink my medication from now onwards. P44: HCW

Rather than causing psychological harm, caregivers and HCWs saw the disclosure book empowering children through increasing their understanding of the importance of and motivation to take their medication to strengthen and increase numbers of body soldiers. Following exposure to the book, caregivers and HCWs described children as having confidence in their actions to stay healthy and keep their body strong.

[E]ven when you ask them why they are taking the medication, that child will tell you that ‘there are some bad guys in my body and I want my anti bodies to be strong and destroy these bad guys.’ P19: HCW

Improved understanding and motivation led children to take responsibility for better adherence.

There is a change in his behavior, before he used to be forced to take his medication but now he runs very fast to go take his medication if he is told and sometimes he even remind himself. P39: mother of 14-year-old boy

Some caregivers reported children's increased attention to their clinic dates, as well.

[S]ometimes she is even the one who reminds me when it is close to her next appointment……or she would come to me and tell me that there is not much medication left. P76: mother of 13-year-old girl

The positive and empowering tone of the disclosure book prepares children and their CG for full HIV disclosure to occur.

by using that method most children will understand what is going on with them, even before you get to the word HIV, … prior to the disclosure tools we used to tell the children that you are HIV positive without…explaining much to them, but with these tools, the important thing is for them to understand what is going on in their bodies, it is only then you can tell them they are also HIV-positive, and then they are able to link up everything. P47: HCW

Back to Top | Article Outline

Accessible and acceptable language

Use of the disclosure book provides a common and accessible language for caregivers, children, and HCWs to use.

I think the booklet works quite well because it is in such a simplified way that even for the caregivers it works well. The children will understand, and it is quite encouraging because after you have done that then in subsequent visits you ask the children and most of the time they still remember whatever you discussed before. P42: HCW

The disclosure book outlines very clearly for caregivers what the disclosure process will be, thus developing their confidence that disclosure will not cause a shock, but will influence medicine taking. They respond well to the knowledge that there will be no mention of HIV if the child and caregiver are not ready.

[T]here was a grandma…[who] didn’t know what to do, and then luckily we had that book… So I spoke to that granny, … she was just fearing. She didn’t want us to mention the word HIV. So by letting her know that we don’t just start telling the child ‘HIV.’ This is how we start, slowly, she agreed….. P91: HCW

Caregivers reported learning from the book as well and adopting the language of the book.

My reaction was positive, we… were shown these pictures, and there are these people surrounding him [the child] and those are the body soldiers, if there is only one person around you it means that your defense system is weak, but if you have a lot of soldiers surrounding you, it means that you are well protected. P53: mother of 12-year-old male

Once the child is told his HIV status, the caregiver and child can revisit the common language to reinforce important adherence behavior.

[W]hen you go to chapter 5 you have to be really specific and show the patient's file and show the child, that when you say CD4, its body soldiers and it's how much, and the viral load, the bad guy, is how much…What you need to do now is work hard, take your medication that we can improve on this, so next time lets work on this and see whether there can be an improvement….Next time the child comes in they can even ask, ‘I have taken blood last time, how is it now?’ P67: HCW

By providing a simple narrative the book helps build relationship between the HCW and CG.

_ …if you show the book with the parent there you will see they will understand better, especially if it comes to the issue where you don’t take your medication on time, the virus comes out of the blanket and wakes up, now if they see that picture of it waking up, one could see it really touches them, it helps them take the medication seriously… P70: HCW

Back to Top | Article Outline

Easy to implement in low-resource settings

The book content and instructions are simple enough to be used by non-specialized HCWs. Any available HCW can use it at the health facilities. Caregivers reported ease with using the disclosure book themselves.

We talked about when a child takes medication correctly they can be healthy, and that if the child wants to be healthy she needs to take his medication. She was even shown pictures about children that looks healthy. We even asked her to choose which child he would like to look like and then he chose a child who looks healthy. P38: mother of 8-year-old boy

An added benefit in the Namibian setting, where many children come to the clinic without a caregiver, is that the book can be read without mentioning HIV, similar to adherence counselling one would do with any medication.

[If] we see that the child is always coming alone we than go through the booklet with the child alone and show him the importance of taking medication without doing a full disclosure (mentioning HIV). P72: HCW

Back to Top | Article Outline


Caregivers and HCWs described a reduction of disclosure barriers resulting from the Namibian disclosure book's guided narrative. Given limited information on pediatric disclosure interventions scalable in low-resource settings, situating our findings within the context of relevant theoretical literature can help generalize knowledge by identifying explanatory mechanisms for how the intervention works [27,29–31,38].

One of the key features of the disclosure book is its use of metaphor to explain the importance of taking medicine without having to mention HIV. This focus on impacting specific behavior (adherence) rather than the disease itself is consistent with evidence of effective adherence communication strategies [31]. The persuasive power of metaphor results from both cognitive and affective responses [39–43]. Metaphor is frequently used in medical education to clarify complex scientific and medical phenomena because it facilitates information processing by rendering the unfamiliar more understandable and manageable [42,44,45]. Studies have demonstrated that affective response is an important determinant of information acceptance [42] and that negative emotions lead to less careful message processing [46]. Children and their caregivers readily adopt the language of ‘body soldiers’ and ‘bad guys’ in describing the importance of antiretroviral medication adherence. Establishment of a degree of conceptual congruence among actors can strengthen the physician–patient relationship by transcending the barriers between them [47]. Productive interactions between the provider and the patient can improve the patient understanding and foster positive coping mechanisms and behaviors [12,31,38,48].

Scholars describing the importance of a gradual disclosure process have drawn on Piagerian theory of developmental stages and absorptive capacity of children [11,31,49]. Current guidelines and recommendations have focused on age as a key indicator for disclosure. However, studies have shown that other factors in addition to age may play an important role in determining readiness for disclosure. With the disclosure book, moving from the metaphor of ‘bad guys’ and ‘soldiers’ to the medical names of CD4, antiretroviral medicine, and HIV is based on both the cognitive and emotional readiness of the child rather than a specific age. The flexibility and reliance on caregiver and HCW assessment may facilitate a sense of ownership and agency in implementing the intervention [32].

Researchers have identified the need for interventions that promote resilience in HIV-infected and affected children and adolescents, rather than focus on ‘pathologies’, in order to identify potentially modifiable processes [12,50–52]. Resilience is defined as the capacity for successful coping despite challenging circumstances [12,52–54] and is correlated with better mental health outcomes and desirable health behaviors, including adherence [12,50–52,55–61]. Studies indicate that individual characteristics strongly associated with resilience include having a sense of purpose, belief in a positive future, hopefulness, not feeling alone, and self-efficacy/empowerment [12,50–52,55–58,60,61]. In alignment with these characteristics, the cartoon book taps into the desire to be healthy, lead a normal life, and have a future ‘like other kids’. Caregivers and HCWs reported the disclosure book positively affected children's motivation to take their medicine and increased their sense of responsibility in tracking their clinical appointment schedules, evidence of children's sense of empowerment to take control of their own health and future. Studies have shown that patients experience comfort in understanding their condition and participating in their own care [12,21], and that long-term, chronic disease management requires pediatric patients to learn to care for themselves [31,62].

The disclosure intervention fits within both ecological and constructivist approaches to understanding resilience. Social ecological perspectives of resilience draw attention away from single influences and acknowledge a complex interaction between the child, family, and the larger environment [52,63]. The cartoon book facilitates this interaction through strengthening communication between caregiver, HCW, and child. Constructivist perspectives on resilience build on strength-based approaches to empowerment [64–67], and emphasize that how people talk about and think about taking their medication has important implications for adherence [57,68]. The cartoon book encourages feelings of self-efficacy and empowers the child with agency to take the medicine to keep the bad guys sleeping and strengthen the body soldiers,

Back to Top | Article Outline

Strengths and limitations/conclusions

The cross-sectional evaluation does not have the generalizability of a randomized control trial, nor can it yet draw from clinical outcomes to assess intervention effectiveness. Our findings rely on self-reports by healthcare workers and caregivers, and our analysis does not include objective measures of disclosure rates. There are no comparable disclosure intervention evaluations from which to draw to help provide comparative context for our findings. However, triangulating data from healthcare workers, caregivers, and the published literature is a common practice in implementation research and strengthens the reliability of our findings.

Back to Top | Article Outline


We would like to thank the caregivers and HCWs who participated in the evaluation. We would also like to thank UCCB for their assistance in conducting and translating interviews, and the Namibia Ministry of Health and Social Services Study Group for providing ongoing consultation to ensure the programmatic relevance of this evaluation.

Sponsorship: This evaluation was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) research grant 1R21HD074071-01.

Contributions: L.B., G.O., M.S., N.H. P.I., and G.C.J. conceptualized the evaluation. L.B. and N.H. led the development of the intervention. G.O., K.M.B., and L.F. conducted the analysis with help from L.B., M.S., N.H., and P.I. G.O. and K.M.B. drafted the manuscript and all authors contributed to the final manuscript. G.O. supervised the project and provided financial support for the study.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Conflicts of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Back to Top | Article Outline


1. Vreeman RC, Gramelspacher AM, Gisore PO, Scanlon ML, Nyandiko WM. Disclosure of HIV status to children in resource-limited settings: a systematic review. J Int AIDS Soc 2013; 16:18466.
2. John-Stewart GC, Wariua G, Beima-Sofie KM, Richardson BA, Farquhar C, Maleche-Obimbo E, et al. Prevalence, perceptions, and correlates of pediatric HIV disclosure in an HIV treatment program in Kenya. AIDS Care 2013; 25:1067–1076.
3. Vreeman RC, Scanlon ML, Mwangi A, Turissini M, Ayaya SO, Tenge C, Nyandiko WM. A cross-sectional study of disclosure of HIV status to children and adolescents in western Kenya. PLoS One 2014; 9:e86616.
4. Wiener L, Mellins CA, Marhefka S, Battles HB. Disclosure of an HIV diagnosis to children: history, current research, and future directions. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2007; 28:155–166.
5. Domek GJ. Debunking common barriers to pediatric HIV disclosure. J Trop Pediatr 2010; 56:440–442.
6. DeMatteo D, Wells LM, Salter Goldie R, King SM. The ’family’ context of HIV: a need for comprehensive health and social policies. AIDS Care 2002; 14:261–278.
7. Klitzman R, Marhefka S, Mellins C, Wiener L. Ethical issues concerning disclosures of HIV diagnoses to perinatally infected children and adolescents. J Clin Ethics 2008; 19:31–42.
8. Vreeman RC, Nyandiko WM, Ayaya SO, Walumbe EG, Marrero DG, Inui TS. The perceived impact of disclosure of pediatric HIV status on pediatric antiretroviral therapy adherence, child well being, and social relationships in a resource-limited setting. AIDS Patient Care STDS 2010; 24:639–649.
9. Bunupuradah T, Kosalaraksa P, Vibol U, Hansudewechakul R, Sophonphan J, Kanjanavanit S, et al. Impact of antiretroviral therapy on quality of life in HIV-infected Southeast Asian children in the PREDICT study. AIDS Patient Care STDS 2013; 27:596–603.
10. Beima-Sofie K, John-Stewart G, Shah B, Wamalwa D, Maleche-Obimbo E, Kelley M. Using health provider insights to inform pediatric HIV disclosure: a qualitative study and practice framework from Kenya. AIDS Patient Care STDS 2014; 28:555–564.
11. Cantrell K, Patel N, Mandrell B, Grissom S. Pediatric HIV disclosure: a process-oriented framework. AIDS Educ Prev 2013; 25:302–314.
12. Amzel A, Toska E, Lovich R, Widyono M, Patel T, Foti C, et al. Promoting a combination approach to paediatric HIV psychosocial support. AIDS 2013; 27:S147–S157.
13. Xu T, Wu Z, Rou K, Duan S, Wang H. Quality of life of children living in HIV/AIDS-affected families in rural areas in Yunnan, China. AIDS Care 2010; 22:390–396.
14. Santamaria EK, Dolezal C, Marhefka SL, Hoffman S, Ahmed Y, Elkington K, Mellins CA. Psychosocial implications of HIV serostatus disclosure to youth with perinatally acquired HIV. AIDS Patient Care STDS 2011; 25:257–264.
15. Fetzer BC, Mupenda B, Lusiama J, Kitetele F, Golin C, Behets F. Barriers to and facilitators of adherence to pediatric antiretroviral therapy in a sub-Saharan setting: insights from a qualitative study. AIDS Patient Care STDS 2011; 25:611–621.
16. Battles HB, Wiener LS. From adolescence through young adulthood: psychosocial adjustment associated with long-term survival of HIV. J Adolesc Health 2002; 30:161–168.
17. Bikaako-Kajura W, Luyirika E, Purcell DW, Downing J, Kaharuza F, Mermin J, et al. Disclosure of HIV status and adherence to daily drug regimens among HIV-infected children in Uganda. AIDS Behav 2006; 10 (4 Suppl):S85–93.
18. Oberdorfer P, Louthrenoo O, Puthanakit T, Sirisanthana V, Sirisanthana T. Quality of life among HIV-infected children in Thailand. J Int Assoc Physicians AIDS Care (Chic Ill) 2008; 7:141–147.
19. Ferris M, Burau K, Schweitzer AM, Mihale S, Murray N, Preda A, et al. The influence of disclosure of HIV diagnosis on time to disease progression in a cohort of Romanian children and teens. AIDS Care 2007; 19:1088–1094.
20. Blasini I, Chantry C, Cruz C, Ortiz L, Salabarría I, Scalley N, et al. Disclosure model for pediatric patients living with HIV in Puerto Rico: design, implementation, and evaluation. Dev Behav Pediatr 2004; 25:181–189.
21. Vaz LM, Eng E, Maman S, Tshikandu T, Behets F. Telling children they have HIV: lessons learned from findings of a qualitative study in sub-Saharan Africa. AIDS Patient Care STDS 2010; 24:247–256.
22. Nicastro E, Continisio GI, Storace C, Bruzzese E, Mango C, Liguoro I, et al. Family group psychotherapy to support the disclosure of HIV status to children and adolescents. AIDS Patient Care STDS 2013; 27:363–369.
23. Lowenthal ED, Marukutira TC. Disclosure of HIV status to HIV-infected children in areas with high HIV prevalence. J Ped Infect Dis 2013; 2:144–146.
24. Domek GJ. Debunking common barriers to pediatric HIV disclosure. J Trop Pediatr 2010; 56:440–442.
25. Kouyoumdjian F, Meyers T, Mtshizana S. Barriers to Disclosure to Children with HIV. J Trop Ped 2005; 51:285–287.
26. Vaz L, Corneli A, Dulyx J, Rennie S, Omba S, Kitetele F, et al. The process of HIV status disclosure to HIV-positive youth in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo. AIDS Care 2008; 20:842–852.
27. Davies P, Walker A, Grimshaw J. A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations. Implement Sci 2010; 5:14.
28. Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q 2004; 82:581–629.
29. Cane J, O’Connor D, Michie S. Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implement Sci 2012; 7:37.
30. Kitson AL. The need for systems change: reflections on knowledge translation and organizational change. J Adv Nurs 2009; 65:217–228.
31. DiMatteo R. Patient education and counseling. Patient Educ Counsel 2004; 55:339–344.
32. Damschroder L, Aron D, Keith R, Kirsh S, Alexander J, Lowery J. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci 2009; 4:50.
33. O’Malley G, Beima-Sofie K, Feris L, Shepard-Perry M, Hamunime N, John-Stewart G, et al. If I take my medicine, I will be strong: evaluation of a pediatric HIV disclosure intervention in Namibia. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2015; 68:e1–e7.
34. Sandelowski M. Focus on qualitative methods: sample size in qualitative research. Res Nurs Health 1995; 18:179–183.
35. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1998.
36. Miles M, Huberman A. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1994.
37. Patton M. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Third ed.Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2002.
38. Kitson AL, Rycroft-Malone J, Harvey G, McCormack B, Seers K, Titchen A. Evaluating the successful implementation of evidence into practice using the PARiHS framework: theoretical and practical challenges. Implement Sci 2008; 3:1.
39. Lakoff G, Johnson M. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press; 1880.
40. Krathwohl DR, Bloom BS, Masia BB. Taxonomy of educational objectives, the Classification of educational goals. Handbook II: Affective domain. New York: David McKay Co., Inc.; 1973.
41. Talley J. Metaphor, narrative and the promotion of public health. Genre 2011; 44:405–423.
42. Krieger JL, Parrott RL, Nussbaum JF. Metaphor use and health literacy: a pilot study of strategies to explain randomization in cancer clinical trials. J Health Commun 2011; 16:3–16.
43. Bloom BS. Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals. New York: David McKay; 1956.
44. Routledge, Harvey K, Koteyko N. Exploring Health Communication: Language in Action. 2012.
45. Periyakoil VS. Using metaphors in medicine. J Palliat Med 2008; 11:842–844.
46. Nabi RL. A cognitive-functional model for the effects of discrete negative emotions on information processing, attitude change, and recall. Commun Theory 1999; 9:292–320.
47. Fuks A, Kreiswirth m, Bourdreau D, Sparks T. Narratives, mataphors, and the clinical relationship. Genre 2011; 4:201–313.
48. Goudge J, Gilson L, Russell S, Gumede T, Mills A. Affordability, availability and acceptability barriers to healthcare for the chronically ill: longitudinal case studies from South Africa. BMC Health Serv Res 2009; 9:
49. Lesch A, Swartz L, Kagee A, Moodley K, Kafaar Z, Myer L, Cotton M. Paediatric HIV/AIDS disclosure: towards a developmental and process-oriented approach. AIDS Care 2007; 19:811–816.
50. Skovdal M. Pathologising healthy children? A review of the literature exploring the mental health of HIV-affected children in sub-Saharan Africa. Transcultural Psychiatry 2012; 49:461–491.
51. Sherr L, Cluver LD, Betancourt TS, Kellerman SE, Richter LM, Desmond C. Evidence of impact: health, psychological and social effects of adult HIV on children. AIDS 2014; 28 (Suppl 3):S251–259.
52. Betancourt TS, Meyers-Ohki SE, Charrow A, Hansen N. Annual research review: mental health and resilience in HIV/AIDS-affected children: a review of the literature and recommendations for future research. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2013; 54:423–444.
53. Eloff I, Finestone M, Makin JD, Boeving-Allen A, Visser M, Ebersöhn L, et al. A randomized clinical trial of an intervention to promote resilience in young children of HIV-positive mothers in South Africa. AIDS 2014; 28 (Suppl 3):S347–357.
54. Murphy DA, Marelich WD. Resiliency in young children whose mothers are living with HIV/AIDS. AIDS Care 2008; 20:284–291.
55. Bhana A, Mellins CA, Petersen I, Alicea S, Myeza N, Holst H, et al. The VUKA family program: piloting a family-based psychosocial intervention to promote health and mental health among HIV infected early adolescents in South Africa. AIDS Care 2014; 26:1–11.
56. Seeley J, Russel S. Social rebirth and social transformation? Rebuilding social lives after ART in rural Uganda. AIDS Care 2010; 22 (Suppl 1):44–50.
57. Curran K, Ngure K, Shell-Duncan B, Vusha S, Mugo NR, Heffron R, et al. ’If I am given antiretrovirals I will think I am nearing the grave’: Kenyan HIV serodiscordant couples’ attitudes regarding early initiation of antiretroviral therapy. AIDS 2014; 28:227–233.
58. Casale M, Wild L, Kuo C. They give us hope: HIV-positive caregivers’ perspectives on the role of social support for health. AIDS Care 2013; 25:1203–1209.
59. Mutwa PR, Van Nuil JI, Asiimwe-Kateera B, et al. Living situation affects adherence to combination antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected adolescents in Rwanda: a qualitative study. PLoS One 2013; 8:e60073.
60. Russell S, Seeley J, Ezati E, Wamai N, Were W, Bunnell R. Coming back from the dead: living with HIV as a chronic condition in rural Africa. Health Policy Plan 2007; 22:344–347.
61. Peterson I, Bhana A, Myeza N, Alicea S, John S, Holst H, et al. Psychosocial challenges and protective influences for socio-emotional coping of HIV+ adolescents in South Africa: a qualitative investigation. AIDS Care 2010; 22:970–978.
62. Swendeman D, Ingram BL, Rotheram-Borus MJ. Common elements in self-management of HIV and other chronic illnesses: an integrative framework. AIDS Care 2009; 21:1321–1334.
63. Stein A, Desmond C, Garbarino J, Van I, Jzendoorn MH, Barbarin O, et al. Predicting long-term outcomes for children affected by HIV and AIDS: perspectives from the scientific study of children's development. AIDS 2014; 28 (Suppl 3):S261–268.
64. Greene GJ, Lee MY, Hoffpauir S. The language of empowerment and strengths in clinical social work: a constructivist perspective. Fam Soc 2005; 86:267–277.
65. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 1977; 84:191–215.
66. Unger M. Resilience across cultures. Br J Soc Work 2008; 38:218–235.
67. Unger M. A constructionist discourse on resilience multiple contexts, multiple realities among at-risk children and youth. Youth Soc 2004.
68. Ezekiel MJ, Talle A, Juma JM, Klepp KI. When in the body, it makes you look fat and HIV negative’: the constitution of antiretroviral therapy in local discourse among youth in Kahe, Tanzania. Soc Sci Med 2009; 68:957–964.

adherence; disclosure; HIV/AIDS; pediatric HIV; stigma

Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.