The latest WHO guidelines recommend efavirenz treatment throughout pregnancy, including during the first trimester [1,2]. Despite evidence for teratogencity in animal models , a meta-analysis found no evidence of an increased risk of overall or central nervous system congenital anomalies associated with first-trimester exposure to efavirenz .
Therapeutic levels of antiretrovirals must be maintained throughout pregnancy to ensure maximal viral suppression to prevent vertical transmission. During pregnancy, temporal changes in hepatic drug-metabolizing enzymes and other physiological changes might affect the metabolism of efavirenz. . Trans-placental passage of antiretrovirals has also been evaluated to assess foetal drug exposure. Efavirenz is primarily metabolized by the hepatic cytochrome 2B6 isoenzyme (CYP2B6); single nucleotide polymorphisms in the CYP2B6 gene significantly efavirenz clearance  and have been associated with early efavirenz treatment discontinuation .
In nonrandomized cohort studies, low efavirenz plasma concentrations have not only been associated with higher virological failure rates but may also have been linked to poor adherence [8,9]. By contrast, the randomized ENCORE-1 study showed equivalent virological efficacy of a lower 400 mg once-daily dose for first-line treatment, than the standard 600 mg dose . The Phase 2 DMP-005 trial also showed similar levels of efficacy for efavirenz at doses of 200, 400 and 600 mg daily .
We searched Medline and EMBASE from 2000 to 2013 for studies of efavirenz pharmacokinetics in pregnancy. Table 1 summarizes the results from the five studies identified, which included 235 pregnant women treated with efavirenz 600 mg once daily [12–17].
In the IMPAACT P1026s study , intensive steady-state 24-h blood sampling was performed during the third trimester and 6–12 weeks postpartum. Antepartum assessment of efavirenz pharmacokinetics was performed at a median (range) gestational age of 33 (30–39) weeks. During pregnancy, the mean efavirenz C 24h was 1.6 mg/l [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.23–8.13], with 12% of mothers having C 24h below the recommended efficacy threshold of 1.0 mg/l; 6–12 weeks postpartum, the mean efavirenz C 24h was 2.05 mg/l (95% CI 0.31–8.43), with 8% of mothers having C 24h below 1.0 mg/l. There was no significant difference in efavirenz AUC or C max between the women during pregnancy and postpartum. However, efavirenz C 24h was significantly lower in the third trimester versus 6–12 weeks postpartum (P = 0.01). One of the 25 infants was vertically infected with HIV. The efavirenz C 24h level in the mother was 1.6 mg/l at 32 weeks gestational age, maternal viral load was 238 copies/ml at delivery and efavirenz was detectable in the cord blood. Efavirenz was able to cross the placenta: at the time of delivery, the median concentration of efavirenz in cord blood was 1.05 mg/l, compared with 2.24 mg/l in maternal blood. The median ratio of cord blood to maternal delivery efavirenz concentration was 0.49 (0.37–0.74).
In the TSHEPISO study , at week 37 of pregnancy, the estimated efavirenz C min was 1.4 mg/l (95% CI 0.99–1.89), with 25.4% of mothers having a C min below 1.0 mg/l. Six weeks postpartum, the estimated efavirenz C min was 1.68 mg/l (95% CI 1.22–2.78), with 20% of mothers having a C min below 1.0 mg/l. There was no significant difference in efavirenz C min between women during pregnancy and postpartum; maternal body weight and CYP2B6 genotype were the most significant predictors of efavirenz plasma concentrations.
In the PROMOTE study , efavirenz pharmacokinetics were evaluated from dried blood spot samples taken during pregnancy and postpartum. Estimates of pharmacokinetics parameters were made using a nonlinear mixed effects pharmacokinetics model. There was no effect of pregnancy on the clearance of efavirenz. In a subsequent study, efavirenz was found to transfer from the mother to the infant in utero, and also during breastfeeding .
In the AMATA study , 13 women received two nucleoside analogues along with efavirenz, starting from week 28 of gestation. Blood samples were collected 3–4 h after the last drug intake. The mean (range) efavirenz concentration in maternal plasma was 6.55 (1.62–14.43) mg/l.
In a French study , seven women received efavirenz for the entire duration of pregnancy, seven only during the first trimester, one during the first two and one during the last two trimesters. The median C min was 2.25 mg/l (range undetectable to 12 mg/l). No difference in efavirenz C min was observed between trimesters. Of the 25 efavirenz C min levels measured, 21 were in the predefined therapeutic range of 1–4 mg/l, one was above 4 mg/l and three were undetectable, suggesting adherence difficulties.
In conclusion, these five studies of 235 women treated with efavirenz during pregnancy reported that efavirenz drug concentrations were not significantly affected and high rates of HIV RNA suppression in the mothers at the time of delivery. The overall results suggest that pregnancy has limited, if any clinically important effects, on efavirenz pharmacokinetics.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
4. Ford N, Mofenson L, Shubber Z, Calmy A, Andrieux-Meyer I, Vitoria M, et al. Safety of efavirenz in the first-trimester of pregnancy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
5. Colbers A, Greupink R, Burger D. Pharmacological considerations on the use of antiretrovirals in pregnancy
. Curr Opin Infect Dis
6. Burger D, van der Helden I, la Porte C, van der Ende M, Groeneveld P, Richter C, et al. Interpatient variability in the pharmacokinetics of the HIV nonnucleoside reverse transciptase inhibitor efavirenz: the effect of gender, race and CYP2D6 polymorphism
. Brit J Pharmacol
7. Wyen C, Hendra H, Siccardi M, Platten M, Jaeger H, Harrer T, et al. Cytochrome P450 2B6 (CYP2B6) and constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) polymorphisms are associated with early discontinuation of efavirenz-containing regimens
. J Antimicrob Chemother
8. Marzolini C, Telenti A, Decosterd LA, Greub G, Biollaz J, Buclin T, et al. Efavirenz plasma levels can predict treatment failure and central nervous system side effects in HIV-1 infected patients
9. Gunda D, Kasang C, Kidenya B, Kabangila R, Mshana S, Kidola J, et al. EFV drug levels ref plasma concentrations of efavirenz and nevirapine among HIV-infected patients with immunological failure attending a tertiary hospital in North-Western Tanzania
. PLoS One
10. Puls R, the ENCORE-1 study group. A daily dose of 400 mg efavirenz (EFV) is noninferior to the standard 600 mg dose: week 48 data from the ENCORE-1 study, a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled noninferiority trial [abstract WELBB01]. 7th International AIDS Society Conference on HIV Pathogenesis, Treatment and Prevention; July 2013; Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
11. Haas D, Hicks C, Seekins D, Cooper R, Gallant J, Carpenter C, et al.A phase II, double blind, placebo controlled, dose-ranging study to assess the antiretroviral activity and safety of efavirenz (DMP-266) in combination with open-label zidovudine with lamivudine at 24 weeks (DMP 266-005) [abstract 698]. 5th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections; February 1998; Chicago.
12. Cressey T, Stek A, Capparelli E, Bowonwatanuowng C, Prommas S, Sirivatanapa P, et al. IMPAACT P1026s TeamEfavirenz pharmacokinetics during the third trimester of pregnancy and postpartum
. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr
13. McIlleron H, Martinson N, Denti P, Mashabela F, Hunt J, Shembe S, et al.the TSHEPISO Study Team. Efavirenz (EFV) concentrations in pregnant women taking EFV-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) with and without rifampin-containing tuberculosis (TB) treatment [Abstract no. MOAB0303]. 19th International AIDS Conference; July 2012; Washington DC.
14. Bartelink IH, Savic RM, Mwesigwa J, Achan J, Clark T, Plenty A, et al. Pharmacokinetics of lopinavir/ritonavir and efavirenz in food insecure HIV-infected pregnant and breastfeeding women in Tororo, Uganda
. J Clin Pharmacol
2013; [Epub ahead of print].
15. Gandhi M, Mwesigwa J, Aweeka F, Plenty A, Charlbois E, Ruel T, et al. Hair and plasma data show that lopinavir,ritonavir and efavirenz all transfer from mother to infant in utero, but only efavirenz transfers via breastfeeding
. J Acq Immune Defic Syndr
16. Schneider S, Peltier A, Gras A, Arendt V, Karasi-Omes C, Mujawamariwa A, et al. Efavirenz in human breast milk, mothers and newborns’ plasma
. J Aquir Immune Defic Syndr
17. Cassard B, Roualt A, Damond F, Pattyn A, Batallan A, Legac S, et al. Plasma concentrations of efavirenz (EFV) in pregnant HIV-infected women treated with EFV containing regimen [Abstract no. WePe3.2C12]. 3rd IAS Conference on HIV Pathogenesis and Treatment; July 2005; Rio De Janeiro, Brazil.