Secondary Logo

Journal Logo


Weight and lean body mass change with antiretroviral initiation and impact on bone mineral density

Erlandson, Kristine M.a; Kitch, Douglasb; Tierney, Camlinb; Sax, Paul E.c; Daar, Eric S.d; Tebas, Pabloe; Melbourne, Kathleenf; Ha, Belindag; Jahed, Nasreen C.h; McComsey, Grace A.i

Author Information
doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e328361d25d
  • Free



Body weight is considered a key determinant of bone mineral density (BMD), however the body weight component among lean mass, peripheral fat mass or visceral adipose tissue with the greatest impact on bone mass is debated [1,2]. Lean body mass (LBM) augments BMD through mechanical load forces and LBM is associated with lower risk of bone fractures [3,4]. Fat mass can have a positive interaction on bone through skeletal loading and adipocyte hormone production, but inflammatory cytokines produced in visceral adipose tissue may exacerbate bone loss [5]. Furthermore, the impact of total fat mass and total LBM on BMD may differ by age, sex, race, and skeletal site [6].

Low BMD is reported across multiple cohorts of both men and women with HIV-infection, with a strong association between lower baseline weight and both lower baseline BMD [7,8] and a greater decline in BMD with antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation [9–11]. Prior to initiating ART, individuals with HIV infection have lower BMD than the general population [12]. Lower weight appears to mediate a significant proportion of the BMD differences [13]. The initiation of ART is often characterized by weight gain [14–17], and it is hypothesized that these changes in weight help to stabilize BMD after the initial loss in BMD observed with ART initiation [13]. Changes in central and peripheral fat with ART initiation and ART regimens are also well described, however a gain in adiposity could be associated with a myriad of other health problems [18–20]. Despite a strong association between greater muscularity and lower mortality [21,22], comparisons of the role of individual ART on LBM and the contribution of body composition components on BMD have not been well defined.

We have previously presented data on changes after ART initiation in BMD, peripheral fat, and visceral adipose tissue from AIDS Clinical Trials Group A5224s, a sub-study of A5202, in which HIV-infected treatment-naive participants were randomized in a double-blinded fashion to abacavir/lamivudine (ABC/3TC) or tenofovir DF/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) with open-label efavirenz (EFV) or atazanavir–ritonavir (ATV/r) [20,23]. Briefly, randomization to TDF/FTC led to a greater decrease in spine and hip BMD, less gain in limb fat, and no significant difference in change in visceral fat compared with ABC/3TC [20,23]. Assignment to ATV/r led to greater losses in spine but not hip BMD, and was associated with significantly greater increase in limb fat and a trend towards greater increase in visceral fat compared with EFV. Here, we compare the changes in weight, BMI, and LBM between the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) components and the nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor/protease inhibitor (NNRTI/PI) components from A5224s. We also explore the association of changes in BMI, LBM, and fat mass with changes in BMD.


A5224s was a sub-study of AIDS Clinical Trials Group A5202, in which ART-naive persons aged at least 16 years and with an HIV-1 RNA load greater than 1000 copies/ml received TDF/FTC or ABC/3TC, with EFV or ATV/r at standard doses. The primary analyses of both A5202 and A5224s have been presented previously [20,23–26]. Specific A5224s exclusion criteria were uncontrolled thyroid disease or hypogonadism; endocrine diseases, including Cushing's syndrome, diabetes mellitus, and the use of growth hormone, anabolic steroids, glucocorticoids, or osteoporosis medications (calcium and/or vitamin D were not included); or the intent to start these treatments known to influence BMD. The duration of the study was 96 weeks after the last A5202 participant enrolled.

Any participant enrolling in A5202 at one of the AIDS Clinical Trials Group sites participating in A5224s and meeting criteria for A5224s was eligible to enroll in the sub-study; A5202 randomization was stratified by willingness to enroll into the sub-study. Each participant signed a written informed consent before enrollment. The study was approved by the local institutional review board at each site.

At baseline, a complete history was obtained and participants underwent a physical examination, including standardized measurement of height and weight. Substudy evaluations, regardless of antiretroviral treatment status, included whole-body dual-energy absorptiometry (DXA) and site-specific (hip and lumbar spine) bone DXA at baseline and at weeks 24, 48, 96, and every 48 weeks until the end of follow-up, as well as a single-slice abdomen computed tomography (CT) scan at the L4-L5 level at baseline and week 96. LBM was defined as fat-free, bone-free mass as measured by DXA in the anteroposterior view (using Hologic or Lunar scanners). Hip BMD, lumbar spine BMD (from L1 to L4), and limb fat were measured by DXA. Technicians were instructed to scan the same hip of each participant for all BMD measurements and to use the same DXA machine on the same participant throughout the study. CT was used to quantify visceral adipose tissue. All DXAs and CT scans were standardized at the participating sites, then centrally read (Tufts) by blinded personnel.

On 18 February 2008, after a median follow-up of 97 weeks (range 0–124 weeks; Q1–Q3 58–108 weeks), the Data Safety and Monitoring Board recommended unblinding the NRTI component of the study for participants with screening HIV-1 RNA levels at least 100 000 copies/ml because of excess virological failures associated with ABC/3TC; participants receiving ABC/3TC were permitted to modify their NRTI regimen [24].

Statistical analysis

The current study was a posthoc, exploratory analysis to compare changes from baseline to week 96 in weight, BMI, and LBM between pooled, randomized NRTI components (ABC/3TC vs. TDF/FTC) and NNRTI/PI components (ATV/r vs. EFV). All analyses were initially performed using the intent-to-treat principle based on randomized treatment assignment in which all available data were included and modifications to randomized treatment were ignored; no imputations were made for missing values. Supplemental as-treated analyses were performed in which values were censored after a change in the randomized NRTI component (when comparing NRTI components) or NNRTI/PI component (when comparing NNRTI/PI components). Comparisons used a factorial analysis approach in which, after assessing for treatment effect modification by the other component, the NRTI effect was analyzed by combining EFV and ATV/r arms and vice versa. The assessment of treatment effect modification (interaction) of each ART component with screening HIV-1 RNA stratum (<100 000 or ≥100 000 copies/ml) was prespecified.

Changes from baseline within study arm or regimen component used one-sample t-tests. Comparisons between regimen components used two-sample t-tests. There was no evidence of an interaction between the NRTI and NNRTI/PI components on 96 week change in weight, BMI, or LBM (all P ≥0.30). Analyses that adjusted for baseline and postbaseline factors and explored associations with baseline and postbaseline factors used linear regression; all multivariable models were adjusted for both ART components. Univariate associations with a P-value less than 0.20 were included in a multivariable model which utilized backwards selection and only factors with a P-value less than 0.05 were retained. Analyses were performed using SAS, version 9.1.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA).


Participant characteristics

A total of 271 participants from 37 AIDS Clinical Trials Group sites in the United States and Puerto Rico were randomized to receive ART; two participants were excluded from the analysis for eligibility violations. Sixty-nine participants were randomized to receive EFV and TDF/FTC, 70 to EFV and ABC/3TC, 65 to ATV/r and TDF/FTC, and 65 to ATV/r and ABC/3TC. Baseline characteristics are summarized in Table 1 and were balanced across study arms. The median age of the participants was 38 years, 85% were men, and 47% were white non-Hispanics. The mean weight was 78.0 kg, BMI was 24.9 kg/m2, CD4+ cell count was 233 cells/μl, plasma HIV-1 RNA was 4.6 log10 copies/ml, and 80% had an HIV-1 RNA less than 100 000 copies/ml at study entry.

Table 1
Table 1:
Baseline characteristics of study participants.

Sixty-six (25%) of A5224s participants prematurely discontinued study follow-up, four (1%) died, and 45% modified the randomized treatment regimen. These details have been previously published [20,23].

Change in weight

Among all participants, weight increased from baseline by a mean of 4.8 kg at week 96 (P < 0.001). The mean changes in weight for each study arm are shown in Fig. 1a. Although ABC/3TC had a trend towards greater weight gain compared with TDF/FTC by intent-to-treat analyses at week 96, this difference was not statistically significant (Fig. 1a). Results in the as-treated analysis were similar [Δ = 1.43 kg; 95% confidence interval (CI) −0.97, 3.83 kg; P = 0.24]. ATV/r assignment resulted in significantly greater weight gain in both intent-to-treat (Fig. 1a) and as-treated analyses (Δ = 3.34 kg; 95% CI 0.97, 5.71 kg; P = 0.006) compared with EFV.

Fig. 1
Fig. 1:
Absolute changes in total weight, BMI, and lean body mass by treatment arms.Mean and 95% confidence intervals are represented by symbols and error bars; P-value from comparison between arms at 96 weeks; TDF/FTC, tenofovir-emtricitabine; ABC/3TC, abacavir-lamivudine; EFV, efavirenz; ATV/r, atazanavir-ritonavir. (a) Changes in total weight between the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) and nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor/protease inhibitor (NNRTI/PI) components. (b) Changes in BMI between NRTI and NNRTI/PI components. (c) Changes in lean body mass between NRTI and NNRTI/PI components.

Change in BMI

Among all participants, BMI increased by a mean of 1.5 kg/m2 at week 96 (P < 0.001). The mean changes in BMI across study arms are shown in Fig. 1b. No significant differences in BMI were detected between ABC/3TC and TDF/FTC by intent-to-treat (Fig. 1b) or as-treated analyses (Δ = 0.53 kg/m2; 95% CI −0.25, 1.31 kg/m2; P = 0.18). Participants randomized to ATV/r experienced a 0.88 kg/m2 greater increase in BMI compared with EFV in the intent-to-treat analysis (Fig. 1b). BMI increase was also higher in the ATV/r compared with EFV by as-treated analysis (Δ = 1.08; 95% CI 0.31, 1.86 kg/m2; P = 0.007).

Change in lean body mass

Across all treatment arms, LBM increased significantly by a mean 1.4 kg at week 96 (P < 0.001). Mean changes in LBM across study arms are shown in Fig. 1c. No significant differences in LBM gain were seen between ABC/3TC and TDF/FTC by intent-to-treat (Fig. 1c) or as-treated analyses (Δ = −0.20 kg; 95% CI −0.80, 1.20 kg; P = 0.70). In comparison to those receiving EFV, participants randomized to ATV/r did not have a significantly different LBM change by intent-to-treat analysis (Fig. 1c) but the difference did approach statistical significance by as-treated analysis (Δ = 1.03 kg; 95% CI −0.03, 1.96 kg; P = 0.056).

A prespecified intent-to-treat subgroup analysis detected a significant interaction between the NNRTI/PI components and screening HIV-1 RNA stratum (P = 0.053), indicating that the treatment effect differed by RNA level. Participants with screening HIV-1 RNA at least 100 000 copies/ml had a significantly greater mean gain in LBM with ATV/r (n = 38) compared with EFV (n = 43; Δ = 1.75 kg; 95% CI 0.18, 3.33; P = 0.029). Differences between ATV/r (n = 56) and EFV (n = 66) in LBM gain were not seen among participants with HIV-1 RNA less than 100 000 copies/ml (Δ = −0.06 kg; 95% CI −1.15, 1.03 kg; P = 0.91).

Baseline associations with change in total body mass, BMI, and lean body mass

In both univariate and multivariable analyses of variables associated with body composition change, higher baseline HIV-1 RNA level and lower CD4+ cell count were associated with a greater gain in total body mass, BMI, and LBM at week 96 after adjusting for treatment arm (Table 2).

Table 2
Table 2:
Univariate and multivariable linear regression to assess the association between baseline factors and change in measures of body mass, adjusted for treatment arm.

Multivariable linear regression analyses

Univariate and multivariable analyses assessed baseline and postbaseline factors associated with week 96 change in hip and lumbar spine BMD. Compared with TDF/FTC, assignment to ABC/3TC was associated with less percentage loss in hip BMD from week 0 to week 96 (mean Δ 1.35; 95% CI 0.18, 2.53; P = 0.02; results previously presented [23]). The change in hip BMD between ATV/r and EFV arms was not statistically significant (mean Δ −0.31; 95% CI −1.50, 0.89; P = 0.61). For hip BMD, in addition to the significant TDF/FTC effect, lower baseline weight, higher increase in CD4+ cell count over 96 weeks, lesser increase in LBM at 96 weeks, and history of fracture were independently and significantly associated with less increase in hip BMD at 96 weeks after adjusting for treatment arm.

Compared with TDF/FTC, assignment to ABC/3TC was associated with less percentage loss in lumbar spine BMD from week 0 to 96 (mean Δ 2.00; 95% CI 0.66, 3.33; P = 0.004) while ATV/r was associated with significantly greater percentage loss in lumbar spine BMD compared with EFV (mean Δ −1.46; −2.82, −0.10; P = 0.035; results previously presented [23]). In multivariable analyses, higher baseline HIV-1 RNA, lower baseline CD4+ cell count, and lack of HIV-1 RNA suppression less than 50 copies/ml at week 96 were independently and significantly associated with less increase in lumbar spine BMD at 96 weeks after adjusting for treatment arm (Table 3).

Table 3
Table 3:
Linear regression identifying significant variables in BMD change with antiretroviral initiation, adjusted for treatment arm.


Our study presents the first longitudinal assessment of changes in LBM after the initiation of ART and the first longitudinal assessment of body fat, visceral fat, and LBM on the change on bone density with current first-line ART initiation. In the setting of a large, randomized trial of antiretroviral initiation among treatment-naive participants, we demonstrated an increase in body weight and BMI across all treatment arms, consistent with prior studies [14–16,18]. A significantly greater gain in total body mass and BMI was observed in the ATV/r arm compared with the EFV arm. Lower baseline CD4+ cell count and higher HIV-1 RNA had a strong association with a positive gain in total body mass, BMI and LBM. These findings likely reflect HIV disease severity and cachexia prior to ART initiation and the return to health phenomenon in patients with more advanced disease.

In the present study, we demonstrated an average increase in LBM among all participants by 96 weeks, with no significant difference between NRTIs but a trend towards greater gain in those assigned to ATV/r compared with EFV. Prior studies of ART initiation or change in ART found an increase in LBM when using older treatment regimens (primarily zidovudine or stavudine based) [14,16,27,28] despite the potential for the thymidine NRTIs to induce mitochondrial toxicity in the muscle tissue [29,30]. Our randomized study reports an increase in LBM for the first time with contemporary first-line ART regimens [31]. Observational cohorts including both ART-treated and ART-naive populations demonstrate stable [32] or increased LBM over time, particularly among those on ART [33–35]. However, these findings have not been consistent across observational cohorts as other studies have demonstrated a decrease in LBM [36,37].

Low BMD and its resultant bone fractures are more prevalent in HIV-infected participants on ART compared with HIV-uninfected populations [38]. The cause of low BMD is unclear but is likely multifactorial. In cross-sectional and longitudinal data of older, HIV-uninfected individuals (primarily women), greater LBM and fat mass are associated with greater BMD [1,6,39]. Furthermore, cross-sectional studies suggest that total body mass may be one of the most significant determinants of BMD of HIV-infected persons [9,10,13]. A cross-sectional study of 221 HIV-infected men (85% on ART) found that weight, LBM, total fat mass, and limb fat were significantly higher among men with normal BMD; older age, lower LBM, and greater stavudine exposure were independently associated with lower BMD in multivariate regression [40]. A recent publication from the Women's Interagency HIV Study cohort (83% on ART) measuring change in BMD over a 5-year period found that among both HIV-infected and uninfected women, higher LBM was associated with increased BMD at the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck and that higher total body fat was associated with increased BMD at the total hip and femoral neck [41].

Consistent with these studies, we demonstrate for the first time in a randomized ART-initiation study that the increase in LBM over 96 weeks was associated with an increase in hip BMD. Surprisingly, we found that increased LBM was associated with greater bone loss at the lumbar spine, although this association was not seen in the multivariable analyses. Furthermore, increased visceral fat over 96 weeks was associated with increased BMD at the hip but associated with decreased BMD at the lumbar spine. The association of visceral fat on hip BMD that we observed may be the result of the mechanical loading effect. Indeed, other studies have demonstrated an increased hip BMD among both men and women with central obesity [42–44]. Similarly, these studies and others found no correlation or a negative correlation between direct or surrogate markers (waist circumference) of visceral adipose tissue and lumbar spine BMD [44–46]. The negative association of adipose tissue with lumbar spine BMD is hypothesized to be the result of pro-inflammatory cytokines [47].

As demonstrated in the Table 3 univariate analyses, week 96 changes in weight, BMI, and LBM were significantly associated with week 96 changes in both hip and lumbar spine BMD. Furthermore, randomization to TDF/FTC led to a greater percentage decrease in both hip and lumbar spine BMD at 96 weeks compared with ABC/3TC, and ATV/r led a greater percentage decrease in lumbar spine BMD change at 96 weeks compared with EFV (previously published [23]). Because of these findings and the significant difference between ATV/r and EFV on week 96 change in weight and BMI presented here, we feel that the effect of the NNRTI/PI component on lumbar spine BMD change may be mediated through changes in weight, BMI, LBM or another factor associated with both weight and BMD change. In addition to the body composition factors presented here, additional metabolic and HIV-related factors could be incorporated using structural equation models or causal mediation analysis to fully assess direct and indirect effects of regimen components.

The study has several limitations. First, the duration of follow-up for bone endpoints was relatively short and the impact of ART or body composition changes on BMD could take several years. Second, the study population was relatively young for bone measures and results may not be applicable to older HIV-infected populations. Third, assignment of ATV/r vs. EFV was not blinded and changes in the NRTI backbone occurred relatively frequently. However, the intent-to-treat results were consistent with the as-treated results, suggesting that changes in the backbone regimens do not explain our results. The A5224s study did not collect smoking, alcohol, menopause status, or physical activity data, which could affect body composition measures, but it is likely that these were evenly distributed at baseline between treatment arms given the randomized study design. Finally, a large number of analyses were performed without adjustment, increasing the probability of committing one or more type I errors, and therefore results should be interpreted with caution. However, this was an exploratory analysis and it will be important for our findings to be confirmed in other studies.

In summary, our study shows that assignment to ATV/r leads to greater gain in body weight and BMI than EFV. Although overall gain in LBM was observed, there were no significant differences in LBM gain between NRTI or NNRTI/PI components. Furthermore, we found both an independent effect of NRTIs and a positive association of increased LBM with change in hip BMD. These findings support the role of lifestyle interventions such as resistance exercise and nutrition to increase lean mass in order to potentially attenuate the initial decline in BMD observed with ART initiation. Prospective studies are needed to assess the role of such lifestyle interventions.


G.A.M developed and led the study protocol. P.E.S, E.S.D., P.T., B.H., K.M., N.J., D.K., and C.T. assisted with study development and implementation. D.K. and C.T. conducted the data analysis. K.M.E. assisted in the data analysis plan and wrote the first article draft. All authors reviewed and edited the article.

Members of the A5224s sub-study include:

Sadia Shaik, MD and Ruben Lopez, MD, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center (Site 603) CTU Grant #:AI0694241, UL1-RR033176. Susan L. Koletar, MD and Diane Gochnour, RN, The Ohio State University Medical Center (Site 2301) CTU Grant # AI069474. Geyoul Kim, RN and Mark Rodriguez, RN, Washington University (Site 2101) CTU Grant #:U01AI069495; GCRC Grant: UL1 RR024992. Elizabeth Lindsey, RN and Tamara James, BS, Alabama Therapeutics CRS (Site 5801) CTU Grant #: U01 AI069452. Ann C. Collier, MD and Jeffrey Schouten, MD, JD, University of Washington (Site 1401) CTU Grant #: AI069434; UL1 RR025014. Jorge L. Santana Bagur, MD and Santiago Marrero MD, Puerto Rico-AIDS Clinical Trials Unit (Site 5401) CTU Grant # 5 U0I AI069415-03. Jenifer Baer, RN, BSN and Carl Fichtenbaum, MD, University of Cincinnati (Site 2401) CTU Grant # AI069513. Patricia Walton, BSN, RN and Barbara Philpotts, BSN, RN, Case Western Reserve (Site 2501) CTU Grant #: AI69501. Princy Kumar, MD and Joseph Timpone, MD, Georgetown University (Site 1008) CTU Grant#: AIDS Clinical Trials Group grant # 5U01AI069494. Donna Pittard, RN, BSN and David Currin, RN, University of North Carolina (Site 3201) CTU Grant #: 5-U01 AI069423–03; UNC CFAR #: P30 AI050410(-11); UNC CTRC #: UL 1RR 025747. Julie Hoffman, RN and Edward Seefried, RN, San Diego Medical Center UC (Site 701) CTU Grant # AI69432. Susan Swindells, MBBS and Frances Van Meter, APRN, University of Nebraska (Site 1505) CTU Grant #: AI 27661. Deborah McMahon, MD and Barbara Rutecki, MSN, MPH, CRNP, University of Pittsburgh (Site 1001) CTU Grant #: 1 U01 AI069494-01. Michael P. Dube, MD and Martha Greenwald, RN, MSN, Indiana University (Site 2601) CTU Grant #: 5U01AI025859; GCRC #: M01 RR00750. Ilene Wiggins, RN and Eric Zimmerman, RN, Johns Hopkins University (Site 201) CTU Grant #: AI27668; CTSA Grant # UL1 RR025005. Judith Aberg, MD and Margarita Vasquez, RN, New York University/NYC HHC at Bellevue Hospital Center (Site 401) CTU Grant #: AI27665, New grant number: AI069532. Martin McCarter and M. Graham Ray, RN, MSN, Colorado AIDS Clinical Trials Unit, (Site 6101) CTU Grant # AI69450; RR025780. Mamta Jain, MD, PI and Tianna Petersen, MS, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (Site 3751) CTU Grant #: 3U01AI046376–05S4. Emily Stumm, BS and Pablo Tebas, MD, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (Site 6201) CTU Grant #: P30-AI0450008–11; CFAR Grant #: UO1-AI069467-04. Mary Albrecht, MD and Neah Kim, NP, Beth Israel Deaconess (Partners/Harvard) CRS (Site 103) CTU Grant # U01 AI069472-04. Paul Edward Sax, MD and Joanne Delaney, RN, Brigham and Women's Hospital (Site 107) CTU Grant # UOI AI 069472. Christine Hurley, RN and Roberto Corales, DO, AIDS Care (Site 1108) CTU Grant #: U01AI069511–02 (as of 2/12/08); GCRC: UL1 RR 024160. Keith Henry, MD and Bette Bordenave, RN, Hennepin County Medical Center (Site 1502) CTU Grant #: N01 AI72626. Wendy Armstrong, MD and Ericka R. Patrick, RN, MSN, CCRC, Emory University HIV/AIDS Clinical Trails Unit (Site 5802) CTU Grant #: UO1Al69418–01/CFAR Grant Number: P30Al050409. Jane Reid, RNC, MS and Mary Adams RN, MPh, University of Rochester (Site 1101) CTU Grant #: U01AI069511–02 (as of 2/12/08); GCRC: UL1 RR 024160. Gene D. Morse, PharmD, FCCP, BCPS, SUNY - Buffalo, Erie County Medical Ctr. (Site 1102) CTU Grant # AI27658. Michael P. Dube, MD and Martha Greenwald, RN, MSN, Wishard Memorial Hospital Indiana University (Site 2603) CTU Grant #: 5U01AI025859; GCRC #: M01 RR00750. Kimberly Y. Smith, MD, MPH and Joan A. Swiatek, APN, Rush University Medical Center (Site 2702) CTU Grant #: U01 AI069471. Nancy Hanks, RN and Debra Ogata-Arakaki, RN, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Leahi Hospital (Site 5201) CTU Grant # AI34853. Ardis Moe, MD and Maria Palmer, PA-C- UCLA Medical Center (Site 601) CTU Grant 1U01AI069424-01. Jeffery Meier, MD and Jack T. Stapleton, MD, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics (Site 1504) CTU Grant #: UL1RR024979. Gary Matthew Cox, MD and Martha Silberman, RN, Duke University Medical Center Adult CRS (Site 1601) CTU Grant # 5U01 AI069 484-02 2705 - Cook County Hospital. Gerianne Casey, RN and William O’Brien, MD, University of Texas, Galveston (Site 6301) CTU Grant # AI32782. Valery Hughes, FNP and Todd Stroberg, RN, Cornell CRS (Site 7803, 7804) – CTU Grant#: U01 AI069419; CTSC #: UL1 RR024996. Nyef El-Daher, MD McCree McCuller Wellness Center at the Connection (Site 1107) CTU Grant #: U01AI069511–02 (as of 2/12/08); GCRC: UL1 RR 024160. Rebecca J. Basham, BS and Husamettin Erdem, MD, Vanderbilt Therapeutics CRS (Site 3652) CTU Grant #: AI46339–01; MO1 RR 00095.

The project described was supported by Award Numbers U01AI068636, AI068634, AI38855 from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, UL1 RR 025005 from the National Center for Research Resources and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health supported by National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases or the National Institutes of Health. GlaxoSmithKline and Gilead funded the cost of the DEXA scans. Study medications were provided by Abbott Pharmaceuticals, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, and GlaxoSmithKline.

Conflicts of interest

E.S.D. has received grant support from Abbott, Gilead, Merck, Pfizer and ViiV as well as been consultant/advisor for Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead, Merck, ViiV and Janssen. G.A.McC. has served as a scientific advisor or speaker for Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Merck, and Gilead Sciences, has received research grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, and Gilead Sciences, and is currently serving as the Data Safety and Monitoring Board Chair for a Pfizer-sponsored study. K.M. is an employee of Gilead Sciences. B.H. is an employee of ViiV Healthcare/ GlaskoSmithKline. P.E.S. is a consultant for Abbott, Bristol- Myers Squibb, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Janssen, and receives grant support from Bristol- Myers Squibb, Gilead, Merck, and GlaxoSmithKline. P.T. has served as a consultant for Merck, is currently serving on a Data Safety and Monitoring Board for Cytheris and on an adjudication committee for GlaxoSmithKline. C.T. is a member of a Data Safety and Monitoring Board for a Tibotec/Janssen hepatitis C drug.

Clinical Trials Registration: NCT00118898


1. Liu-Ambrose T, Kravetsky L, Bailey D, Sherar L, Mundt C, Baxter-Jones A, et al. Change in lean body mass is a major determinant of change in areal bone mineral density of the proximal femur: a 12-year observational study. Calcified Tissue Int 2006; 79:145–151.
2. Macdonald HM, New SA, Campbell MK, Reid DM. Influence of weight and weight change on bone loss in perimenopausal and early postmenopausal Scottish women. Osteoporosis Int 2005; 16:163–171.
3. Ilich-Ernst J, Brownbill RA, Ludemann MA, Fu R. Critical factors for bone health in women across the age span: how important is muscle mass?. Medscape Women's Health 2002; 7:2.
4. Zhang Z, Shen X, Zhang H, Li S, Zhao H, Wu X, et al. The relationship between body composition and fracture risk using the FRAX model in central south Chinese postmenopausal women. Clin Endocrinol 2012; 77:524–530.
5. Russell M, Mendes N, Miller KK, Rosen CJ, Li H, Klibanski A, et al. Visceral fat is a negative predictor of bone density measures in obese adolescent girls. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010; 95:1247–1255.
6. Gnudi S, Sitta E, Fiumi N. Relationship between body composition and bone mineral density in women with and without osteoporosis: relative contribution of lean and fat mass. J Bone Mineral Metab 2007; 25:326–332.
7. Mulligan K, Harris DR, Harris DR, Fielding RA, Worrell C, Kapogiannis BG, et al. Low bone mass in behaviorally HIV-infected young men on antiretroviral therapy: adolescent trials network study 021B. Clin Infect Dis 2012; 55:461–468.
8. Haskelberg H, Hoy JF, Amin J, Ebeling PR, Emery S, Carr A, et al. Changes in bone turnover and bone loss in HIV-infected patients changing treatment to tenofovir-emtricitabine or abacavir-lamivudine. PLoS One 2012; 7:e38377.
9. Sharma A, Cohen HW, Freeman R, Santoro N, Schoenbaum EE. Prospective evaluation of bone mineral density among middle-aged HIV-infected and uninfected women: association between methadone use and bone loss. Maturitas 2011; 70:295–301.
10. Dolan SE, Kanter JR, Grinspoon S. Longitudinal analysis of bone density in human immunodeficiency virus-infected women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006; 91:2938–2945.
11. Bolland MJ, Wang TK, Grey A, Gamble GD, Reid IR. Stable bone density in HAART-treated individuals with HIV: a meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011; 96:2721–2731.
12. Brown TT, Qaqish RB. Antiretroviral therapy and the prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis: a meta-analytic review. AIDS 2006; 20:2165–2174.
13. Bolland MJ, Grey AB, Gamble GD, Reid IR. CLINICAL Review#: low body weight mediates the relationship between HIV infection and low bone mineral density: a meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007; 92:4522–4528.
14. Mallon PW, Miller J, Cooper DA, Carr A. Prospective evaluation of the effects of antiretroviral therapy on body composition in HIV-1-infected men starting therapy. AIDS 2003; 17:971–979.
15. Silva M, Skolnik PR, Gorbach SL, Speigelman D, Wilson IB, Fernandez-Difranco MG, et al. The effect of protease inhibitors on weight and body composition in HIV-infected patients. AIDS 1998; 12:1645–1651.
16. Shikuma CM, Zackin R, Sattler F, Mildwan D, Nyangweso P, Alston B, et al. Changes in weight and lean body mass during highly active antiretroviral therapy. Clin Infect Dis 2004; 39:1223–1230.
17. Gupta V, Biswas A, Sharma SK. Metabolic and body composition changes after six months of highly active antiretroviral therapy in northern Indian patients. Int J STD AIDS 2011; 22:46–49.
18. Shlay JC, Sharma S, Peng G, Gibert CL, Grunfeld C. The effect of individual antiretroviral drugs on body composition in HIV-infected persons initiating highly active antiretroviral therapy. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2009; 51:298–304.
19. Mulligan K, Parker RA, Komarow L, Grinspoon SK, Tebas P, Robbins GK, et al. Mixed patterns of changes in central and peripheral fat following initiation of antiretroviral therapy in a randomized trial. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2006; 41:590–597.
20. McComsey GA, Kitch D, Sax PE, Tebas P, Tierney C, Jahed NC, et al. Peripheral and central fat changes in subjects randomized to abacavir-lamivudine or tenofovir-emtricitabine with atazanavir-ritonavir or efavirenz: ACTG Study A5224s. Clin Infect Dis 2011; 53:185–196.
21. Toss F, Wiklund p, Nordstrom P, Nordstrom A. Body composition and mortality risk in later life. Age Ageing 2012; 41:677–681.
22. Scherzer R, Heymsfield SB, Lee D, Powderly WG, Tien PC, Bacchetti P, et al. Decreased limb muscle and increased central adiposity are associated with 5-year all-cause mortality in HIV infection. AIDS 2011; 25:1405–1414.
23. McComsey GA, Kitch D, Daar ES, Teirney C, Jahed NC, Tebas P, et al. Bone mineral density and fractures in antiretroviral-naive persons randomized to receive abacavir-lamivudine or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-emtricitabine along with efavirenz or atazanavir-ritonavir: Aids Clinical Trials Group A5224s, a substudy of ACTG A5202. J Infect Dis 2011; 203:1791–1801.
24. Sax PE, Tierney C, Collier AC, Fischl MA, Mollan K, Peeples L, et al. Abacavir-lamivudine versus tenofovir-emtricitabine for initial HIV-1 therapy. N Engl J Med 2009; 361:2230–2240.
25. Daar ES, Tierney C, Fischl MA, Sax PE, Mollan K, Budhathoki C, et al. Atazanavir plus ritonavir or efavirenz as part of a 3-drug regimen for initial treatment of HIV-1. Ann Intern Med 2011; 154:445–456.
26. Sax PE, Tierney C, Collier AC, Daar ES, Mollan K, Budhathoki C, et al. Abacavir/lamivudine versus tenofovir DF/emtricitabine as part of combination regimens for initial treatment of HIV: final results. J Infect Dis 2011; 204:1191–1201.
27. Thompson V, Medard B, Taseera K, Chakera AJ, Andia I, Emenyonu N, et al. Regional anthropometry changes in antiretroviral-naive persons initiating a Zidovudine-containing regimen in Mbarara, Uganda. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 2011; 27:785–791.
28. Dube MP, Qian D, Edmondson-Melancon H, Sattler FR, Goodwin D, Martinez C, et al. Prospective, intensive study of metabolic changes associated with 48 weeks of amprenavir-based antiretroviral therapy. Clin Infect Dis 2002; 35:475–481.
29. McComsey GA, Paulsen DM, Lonergan JT, Hessenthaler SM, Hoppel CL, Williams VC, et al. Improvements in lipoatrophy, mitochondrial DNA levels and fat apoptosis after replacing stavudine with abacavir or zidovudine. Aids 2005; 19:15–23.
30. McComsey GA, Walker UA. Role of mitochondria in HIV lipoatrophy: insight into pathogenesis and potential therapies. Mitochondrion 2004; 4:111–118.
31. Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in HIV-1-infected adults and adolescents. Department of Health and Human Services. Available at: [Accessed on 10 December 2012].
32. Yarasheski KE, Scherzer R, Kotler DP, Dobs AS, Tien PC, Lewis CE, et al. Age-related skeletal muscle decline is similar in HIV-infected and uninfected individuals. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2011; 66:332–340.
33. McDermott AY, Terrin N, Wanke C, Skinner S, Tchetgen E, Shevitz AH. CD4+ cell count, viral load, and highly active antiretroviral therapy use are independent predictors of body composition alterations in HIV-infected adults: a longitudinal study. Clin Infect Dis 2005; 41:1662–1670.
34. McDermott AY, Shevitz A, Knox T, Roubenoff R, Kehayias J, Gorbach S. Effect of highly active antiretroviral therapy on fat, lean, and bone mass in HIV-seropositive men and women. Am J Clin Nutr 2001; 74:679–686.
35. Bolland MJ, Grey A, Horne AM, Briggs SE, Thomas MG, Ellis-Pegler RB, et al. Stable bone mineral density over 6 years in HIV-infected men treated with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Clin Endocrinol 2012; 76:643–648.
36. Kolta S, Flandre P, Van PN, et al. Fat tissue distribution changes in HIV-infected patients treated with lopinavir/ritonavir. Results of the MONARK trial. Curr HIV Res 2011; 9:31–39.
37. Boyd MA, Carr A, Ruxrungtham K, et al. Changes in body composition and mitochondrial nucleic acid content in patients switched from failed nucleoside analogue therapy to ritonavir-boosted indinavir and efavirenz. J Infect Dis 2006; 194:642–650.
38. McComsey GA, Tebas P, Shane E, et al. Bone disease in HIV infection: a practical review and recommendations for HIV care providers. Clin Infect Dis 2010; 51:937–946.
39. Ho-Pham LT, Nguyen ND, Lai TQ, Nguyen TV. Contributions of lean mass and fat mass to bone mineral density: a study in postmenopausal women. BMC Musculoskeletal Disord 2010; 11:59.
40. Carr A, Miller J, Eisman JA, Cooper DA. Osteopenia in HIV-infected men: association with asymptomatic lactic acidemia and lower weight preantiretroviral therapy. AIDS 2001; 15:703–709.
41. Sharma A, Tian F, Yin MT, Keller MJ, Cohen M, Tien PC. Association of regional body composition with bone mineral density in HIV-infected and uninfected women: women's interagency HIV study.J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2012; 61:469–476.
42. Kinjo M, Setoguchi S, Solomon DH. Bone mineral density in adults with the metabolic syndrome: analysis in a population-based U.S. sample. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007; 92:4161–4164.
43. Szulc P, Varennes A, Delmas PD, Goudable J, Chapurlat R. Men with metabolic syndrome have lower bone mineral density but lower fracture risk: the MINOS study. J Bone Mineral Res 2010; 25:1446–1454.
44. von Muhlen D, Safii S, Jassal SK, Svartberg J, Barrett-Connor E. Associations between the metabolic syndrome and bone health in older men and women: the Rancho Bernardo Study. Osteoporosis Int 2007; 18:1337–1344.
45. Jankowska EA, Rogucka E, Medras M. Are general obesity and visceral adiposity in men linked to reduced bone mineral content resulting from normal ageing? A population-based study. Andrologia 2001; 33:384–389.
46. Blaauw R, Albertse EC, Hough S. Body fat distribution as a risk factor for osteoporosis. South Afr Med J 1996; 86:1081–1084.
47. Sheu Y, Cauley JA. The role of bone marrow and visceral fat on bone metabolism. Curr Osteoporosis Rep 2011; 9:67–75.

antiretroviral therapy; body composition; body weight; bone mineral density; HIV; lean body mass; randomized clinical trial

© 2013 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.