Share this article on:

M1 polarization of human monocyte-derived macrophages restricts pre and postintegration steps of HIV-1 replication

Cassetta, Lucaa,d; Kajaste-Rudnitski, Annab,f; Coradin, Tizianab,e; Saba, Elisaa; Della Chiara, Giuliaa,g; Barbagallo, Marialuisaa; Graziano, Francescaa,c; Alfano, Massimoa; Cassol, Edanaa,h; Vicenzi, Elisab; Poli, Guidoa,c

doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e328361d059
Basic Science

Objective: Functional polarization of human monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs) into M1 cells leads to inhibition of R5 HIV-1 replication and viral DNA synthesis in comparison to control, unpolarized cells together with CD4 downregulation from the cell surface and upregulation of CCR5-binding chemokine secretion. We here investigated whether a postentry restriction of virus replication is also induced by M1 polarization of MDM.

Design: MDM were first polarized to M1 cells by 18 h stimulation with interferon-γ and tumor necrosis factor-α; the cytokines were then removed and the cells were infected with vesicular stomatitis virus G-protein pseudotyped enhanced green fluorescence protein HIV-1 (HIV-GFP) generating a single-round infection cycle.

Methods: HIV-1 expression was monitored in terms of eGFP expression by fluorescence activated cell sorter (FACS) analysis and real-time PCR analysis of total HIV-1 gag DNA, 2-long terminal repeat DNA, proviral DNA, and multiply spliced RNA transcripts. Expression of apolipopoprotein B mRNA-editing, enzyme-catalytic, polypeptide-like 3G (APOBEC3G), and APOBEC3A was tested by western blotting and FACS analysis.

Results: Inhibition of HIV-GFP expression was observed in M1-MDM along with impaired viral DNA synthesis, delayed proviral integration, and reduced proviral transcription. Although APOBEC3G levels were similar in M1 and unpolarized MDM, APOBEC 3A was selectively expressed only by M1 cells.

Conclusion: M1 polarization of in-vitro differentiated primary MDM determines a transient, but profound restriction of HIV-1 replication affecting multiple (entry and postentry) steps in the virus life cycle likely involving the upregulated expression of APOBEC3A.

aAIDS Immunopathogenesis Unit

bViral Pathogens and Biosafety Unit, Division of Immunology, Transplantation and Infectious Diseases, San Raffaele Scientific Institute

cUniversità Vita-Salute Salute San Raffaele, School of Medicine, Milan, Italy

dDepartment of Developmental and Molecular Biology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA

eCentre for Integrative Biology, University of Trento, Mattarello, Trento

fSan Raffaele Telethon Institute for Gene Therapy, San Raffaele Scientific Institute

gDepartment of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy

hDepartment of Cancer Immunology and AIDS, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Correspondence to Professor Guido Poli, P2-P3 Laboratories, DIBIT-1, Via Olgettina n. 58, 20132 Milan, Italy. Tel: +39 02 2643 4909; fax: +39 02 2643 4905; e-mail:

Received 13 January, 2012

Revised 6 March, 2013

Accepted 29 March, 2013

Back to Top | Article Outline


In analogy to the Th1/Th2 functional subdivision of CD4+ T-helper lymphocytes, mononuclear phagocytes can also be transiently and reversibly polarized along with pro-inflammatory (M1) or alternatively activated, anti-inflammatory (M2) pathways [1–6]. M1 macrophages express high levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, secrete reactive oxygen and nitrogen intermediates, and their presence has been associated to protection from viral infections and to some tumors [1–3]. In contrast, M2 polarization gears macrophages toward wound repair, tissue remodeling, and neoangiogenesis, and their presence has been correlated to tumor progression [7]. In addition, M2 macrophages may contribute to the maintenance of a balanced microenvironment in anatomical sites under constant microbial assault such as the gut mucosa [6,8].

Both circulating monocytes [9,10] and, in particular, tissue macrophages [11], in addition to CD4+ T cells, are main targets of HIV-1 infection. Unlike T lymphocytes, macrophage infection by HIV-1 does not lead to their depletion, either in vivo or in vitro, rendering these cells a potential major viral reservoir even in the presence of effective combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) [11]. Concerning the potential role of macrophage polarization in HIV-1 infection, in-vitro infected human primary monocyte-derived macrophages (MDM) polarized to either M1 or M2 showed a potent, though transient, inhibition of CCR5-dependent (R5) HIV-1 replication in comparison to unpolarized cells. This inhibitory effect was more potent in M1-MDM than in M2-MDM, although it was rapidly lost when M1-MDM were infected 3 days after removal of the polarizing cytokines, that is, interferon-γ (IFN-γ) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α). The M1-dependent inhibition of virus replication was associated with a strong downregulation of CD4 from the cell surface, an increased secretion of CCR5-binding chemokines, and a significant decrease in viral DNA and protein synthesis [8]. These findings indicated that M1 polarization likely imposes a major restriction to HIV-1 infection at the level of virus entry. In partial contrast, the M2a-dependent inhibition was longer-lasting than that of M1-MDM and did not involve decreased HIV DNA synthesis or viral protein expression, suggesting interference at later steps in the viral life cycle [8,12].

In order to investigate whether postentry restriction events were triggered by M1 polarization of MDM, we infect them with an integration-competent vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV)-G pseudotyped vector controlling enhanced green fluorescence protein (eGFP) expression establishing a single round of infection. Our results support the hypothesis that, in addition to impairing HIV-1 entry, M1 polarization of macrophages creates a hostile postentry environment for HIV-1 replication in these cells.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Materials and methods


The following reagents were purchased: human, endotoxin-free recombinant cytokines (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA), bovine serum albumin (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, Missouri, USA), Ficoll-Hypaque (Amersham Biosciences Europe, Milan, Italy), Percoll (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA), Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM), phosphate buffered saline, fetal bovine serum (FBS), normal human serum (NHS), penicillin, streptomycin, and glutamine (Lonza, Cologne, Germany).

Back to Top | Article Outline

Vesicular stomatitis virus-G enhanced green fluorescence protein pseudotyped HIV-1 (HIV-green fluorescence protein)

The HIV-1 vector and plasmid used in this study have been described previously [13]. HIV-GFP virus (in which nef was replaced with the eGFP reporter gene) was produced by cotransfection with a ratio of 1 : 7 of pMD2.G together with pNL4–3_GFP_R-Env- [14]. Both plasmids were obtained from the NIH AIDS Research and Reference Program, Division of AIDS, NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. Vector containing supernatants were harvested 48 h after cell transfection, cleared by centrifugation, filtered by a 0.45 μm filter (MILLEX-HV PVDF; Millipore, Carrigtwohill, County Cork, Ireland), and stored at −80°C.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Isolation of human monocytes, differentiation into monocyte-derived macrophages, and infection with replication-competent HIV-1

Monocyte-enriched peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated from the buffy coats of healthy HIV-1-seronegative blood donors by Ficoll-Hypaque and then by Percoll density gradient centrifugation [8,15]. The cells were then washed, resuspended in DMEM with heat-inactivated FBS (10%) and 5% heat-inactivated NHS (complete medium), and seeded at 2.5 × 105 cells/well into 48-well plastic plates (Falcon; Becton Dickinson Labware, Lincoln Park, New Jersey, USA). Monocytes were cultivated for 7–8 additional days at 37°C in 5% CO2 to promote their full differentiation into MDM [16]. These cells (>95% CD14+) were then stimulated or not (Control) for 18 h with either TNF-α and IFN-γ or with IL-4 to induce either M1 or M2a polarization [3,8,12]. At the end of the 18-h period, cells were washed, resuspended in complete medium, and infected with the laboratory-adapted CCR5-dependent (R5) strain HIV-1BaL (multiplicity of infection, MOI, of 0.1). Aliquots of culture supernatants were collected over a 5-week period and stored at −20°C to measure the levels of virion-associated reverse transcriptase activity [17].

Back to Top | Article Outline

HIV-green fluorescence protein infection of monocyte-derived macrophages and green fluorescence protein detection by cytofluorometry

Both control and M1-MDM were infected with serial dilutions of HIV-GFP viral stock. After 6 days of culture, the MDM (7.5 × 105 cells/condition) were scraped, spun, and their pellet was resuspended in a fixing solution containing 2% paraformaldehyde (PFA). Flow cytometry for GFP expression was performed using a Gallios instrument (Beckman Coulter, Jersey City, New Jersey, USA), and the results were analyzed with the FlowJo software version 8.4.3 (Tree Star, Ashland, Oregon, USA).

Back to Top | Article Outline

PCR-based quantification of HIV-1 gag DNA, 2-long terminal repeat circles, and integrated HIV-1 DNA

Both control and M1-MDM were infected with DNAse-treated HIV-GFP (stock dilution 1 : 10) and were then cultivated at 106 cells/ml of complete medium for 2 days. Cells were then washed, lysed, and treated with proteinase K (Sigma-Aldrich) at 65°C for 2 h and then at 95°C for 15 min [18]. An amount of lysate corresponding to 2.5 × 104 cells was used in the PCR reactions together with a HIV-1 gag gene primer pair and probe [19]. The number of HIV-1 DNA copies was determined by interpolating a reference standard curve (showing a linear distribution, r = 0.99, between 101 and 107 copies) after normalization for human glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) DNA copy number by an external standard curve, as published [20].

For quantitation of 2-long terminal repeat (2-LTR) DNA circles, genomic DNA was isolated from cells according to the published procedure [18]; the MH535 and MH536 primers and the MH603 probe were used to identify 2-LTR circles formation [21]. All reactions were performed in a volume of 25 μl containing 1 × TaqMan Universal Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, USA), and 300 nmol/l of forward primer, reverse primer, and 100 nmol/l of molecular probe. The reaction was run by the Applied Biosystems 7500 Fast Real-time PCR system and 7500 Fast System Software. The thermal program started with 2 min at 50°C, followed by a 15-min hot start at 95°C. This was followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s and 60°C for 60 s; GAPDH was used as normalization control.

The levels of integrated proviral DNA were estimated adopting the published Alu-PCR protocol, involving a nested PCR-based assay with two sets of Alu-LTR primers and a probe, with minor modifications [22]. Genomic DNA (100 ng) was first amplified with AccuPrime Taq DNA Polymerase High Fidelity (Life Technologies Italia, Monza, Italy) in a DNA thermal cycler (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA). Then, a real-time PCR was performed with an aliquot equivalent to 1/10th of the 25th cycle PCR product with the second-round LTR primers and TaqMan probe. For control, all samples were also amplified with a primer pair and probe targeting mitochondrial DNA. Standard curves for both target and normalizer were obtained by nested PCR, as described above, using serially diluted genomic DNA (from 500 to 0.4 ng). The levels of proviral DNA, calculated from the standard curves, were expressed as ng of integrated provirus normalized to those of a mitochondrial DNA standard curve.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Quantification of HIV-1 RNA transcripts

Total cellular RNA was obtained with the TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies) and the PureLink Micro-to-Midi Total RNA Purification System (Ambion Life science, Austin, Texas, USA). The RNA (1 μg) was incubated with DNase I (Roche Diagnostics Co.) and the cDNA synthesis was carried out using SuperScriptII and random hexamers (Life Technologies) [23]. As negative control, the same samples were processed in the same conditions in the absence of SuperScript II.

Both unspliced (us) and multiply spliced (ms) Tat/Rev HIV-1 RNAs were quantified using 50 ng of cDNA by TaqMan assay in an ABI 7700 Prism instruments (Applied Biosystems), as published [24]. To correct for inter-sample variations in real-time PCR efficiency and errors in sample quantification, a set of 18S PCR reactions (18S primer pair and probe from Applied Biosystems) was performed as invariant endogenous control in the assay. The usHIV-1 RNA was quantified from the cDNA with the same primer pair and probe used for the quantification of the HIV-1 DNA described above.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Western blot analysis of APOBEC3G (A3G) and A3A expression

MDM were scraped from the plastic surface with a rubber policeman and lysed in buffer C (106 cells/100 μl). Cellular proteins were denatured, separated on a 10% SDS-PAGE gel, and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (Hybond ECL; Amersham Biosciences) by electroblotting. For A3G detection, blotting membranes were incubated with an anti-A3G rabbit polyclonal antibody, kindly provided by Dr Klaus Strebel, LMM, NIAID, NIH, at 1 : 500 dilution in 20 mmol/l TrisHCl, pH 7.6, 137 mmol/l NaCl, and 0.2% Tween 20 (tBST) buffer for 30 min at room temperature. For A3A, the membranes were directly incubated with a rabbit polyclonal antibody (1 : 500 dilution) against A3A/B (cat n. sc-86289; Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Santa Cruz, California, USA) in tBST buffer for 30 min at room temperature. Antibody binding was visualized by using horseradish peroxydase (HRP)-conjugated antirabbit antibodies and electro-chemical luminescence (ECL; Amersham Biosciences).

Back to Top | Article Outline

Flow cytometric analysis of intracellular A3A expression

MDM were washed and detached from the plastic plates by scraping with a rubber policeman. The cells (1.5 × 106 per condition) were centrifuged (1500 rpm for 5 min at 4°C) and then fixed and permeabilized using a Fix&Perm kit (Life Technology); incubation with cold methanol allowed the permeabilization of both plasma and nuclear membranes. A3A expression was evaluated with the same antibody used for western blotting and a secondary antirabbit FITC-conjugated antibody. Flow cytometry was performed using a LSRII instrument (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, California, USA) and the results were analyzed with the FlowJo 8.4.3 software (Tree Star).

Back to Top | Article Outline

Statistical analysis

All statistical analysis was performed using the Prism GraphPad software v. 5.0 (GraphPad Software, Comparison between two groups was performed using paired or unpaired, two-tailed t-test, whereas one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare three or more groups.

Back to Top | Article Outline


M1 polarization of monocyte-derived macrophages inhibits R5 HIV-1BaL replication and proviral transcription

We have previously reported that M1 polarization of MDM resulted in a profound inhibition of R5 HIV-1 replication, as shown in Fig. 1a[8]. We here demonstrate that infection of M1-MDM with a replication-competent R5 HIV-1BaL strain is also characterized by an impaired proviral transcription of usRNA (full length) RNA (Fig. 1b), as measured 5 days postinfection, whereas the levels of msRNA were undetectable even by real-time PCR (data not shown).

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

Back to Top | Article Outline

Inhibition of HIV-green fluorescence protein expression in M1-monocyte-derived macrophages

In order to investigate whether the M1 restriction could be exclusively accounted for by a reduced entry of HIV-1 into MDM [8], we infected either M1-MDM or control MDM with HIV-GFP, a vector in which the VSV-G envelope protein allows fusion of the virion and cell membranes bypassing the requirement of engaging CD4 and CCR5 [13].

MDM cultures were established from 19 independent donors and were then either left unpolarized or were polarized to become M1 cells before infection with HIV-GFP (0.1 log10 dilution); eGFP expression was assessed by cytofluorimetric analysis 6 days postinfection. The percentage of eGFP+ positive cells of one infection representative of 19 independently performed is shown in Fig. 2a. Indeed, HIV-GFP expression was inhibited in M1-MDM in comparison to control, unpolarized cells. Similar levels of inhibition were observed when cells were infected with either 1 or 0.1 log10 dilutions of the viral stock, whereas an additional 10-fold dilution did not result in significant levels of eGFP expression in either polarized or control cells (Fig. 2b).

Fig. 2

Fig. 2

Back to Top | Article Outline

Inhibition of HIV-green fluorescence protein DNA synthesis, delayed proviral integration, and impaired proviral transcription in M1-monocyte-derived macrophages

We next investigated whether the inhibition of HIV-GFP single-round infection was correlated with decreased levels of HIV DNA synthesis. Indeed, 2 days after infection, M1 polarization consistently led to a marked decrease in the accumulation of HIV-1 DNA copies vs. control cells (Fig. 3a; n = 3; P = 0.055) and this effect was partially observed 7 days after infection when the levels of total DNA decreased significantly likely as a consequence of DNA degradation.

Fig. 3

Fig. 3

M1 polarization led to a significant reduction of both episomal 2-LTR DNA circles and of integrated proviral DNA, as measured by Alu-PCR, in comparison to control cells 2 days postinfection (P = 0.027 and P = 0.039, respectively, n = 3; Fig. 3b and c). However, these differences were not observed when the levels of both DNA forms were quantified 7 days postinfection (Fig. 3b and c). Unlike what was observed with quantification of gag DNA, both 2-LTR and integrated proviral DNA did not decrease in control MDM; however, it should be underscored that these DNA forms represent only a fraction of the total HIV DNA (Fig. 3a). Thus, M1 polarization of MDM seems to result in a transient inhibition of HIV-1 DNA synthesis and delayed kinetics of proviral integration, but not in an absolute impairment of retroviral integration. This interpretation was supported by the observation that R5 HIV-1 infection of M1-MDM was still inhibited when an HIV integrase inhibitor (Indole) was added to the culture 3 days after infection, when infection of control MDM was no longer inhibited by this agent (data not shown).

As for HIV-1 DNA synthesis, and in analogy to what was observed with replication-competent R5 HIV-1 (Fig. 1b), inhibition of HIV-GFP msRNA was significantly reduced 2 days postinfection (P = 0.033; Fig. 3d), although this inhibitory effect was greatly lost 7 days after infection.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Selective upregulation of A3A, but not of A3G, in M1-monocyte-derived macrophages

Searching for potential molecular determinants of the postentry restriction the HIV life cycle imposed by M1 polarization of MDM, we focused on the APOBEC family of restriction factors that encompasses A3G, a very potent inhibitor of HIV-1 replication in different cell types, including macrophages [25].

Therefore, we performed western blot analysis for A3G expression in both control and M1-MDM lysates prepared at the time of HIV-1 infection (i.e. 18 h postpolarization). However, M1-MDM expressed levels of A3G comparable to those of both control and M2a-MDM in all the five donors tested (Fig. 4a). In contrast, whereas both control and M2a-MDM showed barely detectable levels of A3A, M1-MDM expressed significant levels of this protein that were comparable to those of freshly isolated monocytes (Fig. 4a and b). We further confirmed this observation by an intracellular staining and fluorescence activated cell sorter (FACS) analysis of control, M1-MDM, and M2a-MDM for A3A expression. Approximately, 50% of M1-MDM vs. 10% of control and M2a-MDM were positive for A3A expression (Fig. 4c). However, as western blotting did not reveal detectable levels of A3A expression in either control or M2a-MDM (Fig. 4a and b), it is likely that the weak positivity shown by control and M2a-MDM was due to the described cross-reactivity of the antibody for A3B (data not shown).

Fig. 4

Fig. 4

Back to Top | Article Outline

A3A expression correlates with HIV-1 restriction in M1-monocyte-derived macrophages

In order to substantiate the potential role of A3A in M1-induced restriction of virus replication, western blotting was performed with lysates of both control and M1-MDM prepared 18, 72, and 168 h postpolarization. M1-MDM, but not control, MDM expressed detectable levels of A3A 18 and 72 h after polarization, whereas its expression was almost undetectable in either cell type 168 h postpolarization (Fig. 5a). No differences in the expression of A3G between control and M1-MDM were observed at all time points (data not shown).

Fig. 5

Fig. 5

The same MDM were also infected with HIV-GFP at the same time points after polarization (i.e., 18, 72, and 168 h) and the percentage of eGFP+ cells was determined by cytofluorimetric analysis 6 days after the infection. The percentage of eGFP+ M1-MDM was significantly lower than that of control MDM when the infection was performed both 18 and 72 h after polarization (Fig. 5b). In contrast and in concomitance with the disappearance of A3A expression, substantially higher levels of eGFP, approaching control levels, were expressed by M1-MDM infected 168 h postpolarization (Fig. 5b).

Back to Top | Article Outline


In the present study, we have demonstrated that HIV-1 replication was significantly impaired in M1-MDM, even when the infection occurred in a CD4/CCR5-independent manner by an HIV-GFP vector leading to a single-round replication, as revealed by eGFP expression. As observed with R5 HIV-1, the M1-dependent restriction of single-round infection was associated with a decreased synthesis of HIV DNA, both total gag and 2-LTR episomal circles, delayed proviral integration, and reduced transcription of msRNA after 2 days of infection. A clear-cut upregulation of A3A to levels observed in freshly isolated monocytes, but not of A3G, was observed in M1-MDM. Disappearance of A3A expression after 7 days of culture was paralleled by a greatly restored capacity of M1-MDM to sustain HIV-1 replication.

M1 polarized macrophages activate host defense programs against intracellular pathogens, including viruses, upregulate the expression of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I and class II antigens, and secrete complement factors that facilitate phagocytosis [3]. Conversely, M2a-MDM are specialized in wound healing and tissue repair [6,7]. Unlike CD4+ T cells, M1/M2 macrophage polarization is reversible within a few days after cytokine stimulation, as we also demonstrated in the context of in-vitro HIV-1 infection [8]. In particular, a more potent inhibition of R5 HIV-1 replication vs. M2-MDM was observed in M1-MDM. This observation was correlated to a profound downregulation of CD4 from the cell surface, increased secretion of CCR5-binding chemokines, and decreased synthesis of HIV-1 DNA [8,12]. This restriction profile strongly suggested that M1 polarization impedes R5 HIV-1 entry; however, our present study indicates that additional, postentry steps in the HIV-1 life cycle are also impaired upon M1 polarization of MDM. In fact, a reduced HIV-1 DNA synthesis was also observed with an HIV-GFP vector bypassing the requirement for CD4-CCR5-dependent entry. This effect was associated with a delayed integration of HIV-GFP proviral DNA that, however, reached levels comparable to those of control MDM 7 days after infection. These observations suggest that M1 polarization causes a decreased efficiency of the reverse transcription and proviral integration processes. In this regard, a potential role in M1 restriction could be played by Pin1, a TNF-inducible [26] prolyl-isomerase enzyme that catalyzes a conformational modification of integrase and was previously shown to regulate HIV-1 integration in activated T lymphocytes [27].

Regarding the potential role of the APOBEC cytidine deaminase family of intracellular proteins, both IFN-α and IFN-γ are known to upregulate the expression of this protein in a variety of cells, including human MDM, resulting in an improved resistance to HIV-1 infection [25]. In particular, A3G exerts a potent anti-HIV activity by different mechanisms [28–30], including the impairment of the reverse transcription step; as countermeasure, HIV-1 encodes the accessory protein Vif that targets A3G for proteasomal degradation [29,31]. In MDM, siRNA-mediated silencing of A3G resulted in significant blockade of IFN-induced anti-HIV activity [25]. However, M1-polarized MDM demonstrated only a modest upregulation of A3G levels without any evident correlation with HIV-GFP kinetics of expression. In contrast, we observed a clear-cut association between the pattern of HIV-1 restriction in M1-MDM and the expression of A3A.

A3A shares sequence and functional homology with A3G and it is a potent inhibitor of adeno-associated virus and parvoviruses infections [32] as well as of retrotransposons [33]. A potential role of cell-associated A3A has been hypothesized as responsible for the infrequent editing of HIV-1 reverse transcripts [34], although others concluded that this protein alone was not a restriction factor for HIV-1 [35]. Unlike A3G, nascent virions did not package A3A due to lack of its interaction with Vif [35].

A3A was recently shown to be a myeloid-specific protein upregulated by HIV-1 infection of MDM and interfering with the early phases of HIV-1 infection [36]. In this regard, both IFN or CpG DNA stimulation of macrophages upregulated A3A expression leading to cytidine to uridine deamination of foreign double-stranded DNA and DNA degradation [37,38]. A3A is constitutively expressed in monocytes, cells characterized by a significantly restricted HIV-1 replication, whereas its expression was lost during macrophage differentiation and it was rescued by IFN-α stimulation [39]. Thus, A3A can be considered a potential anti-HIV restriction factor expressed by monocytes and M1-polarized MDM. Whether A3A and A3G (nonetheless expressed in both M1-MDM and control cells) could physically or functionally interact is currently unknown, although both A3A-Vpr and AG-3A chimeras inhibited efficiently HIV-1 replication [35,40].

In conclusion, M1 polarization of macrophages in vitro induces a transient state of relative resistance to HIV-1 infection, involving reduced entry and reverse transcription, delayed integration of proviral DNA, and transcriptional repression. These results highlight the plasticity of macrophages in response to environmental signals, such as cytokines, that, in the case of M1 polarization, may lead to multistep restriction of HIV-1 replication while enhancing their antigen-presenting capacity, thus potentiating the adaptive immune response to the infection. Our study supports the concept that investigating macrophage polarization in vivo may not only allow a better understanding of the immune response to HIV (and to other viral infections), but also contribute to the development of more effective strategies for preventing infections by means of vaccines and microbicides.

Back to Top | Article Outline


L.C., E.S., G.D.C., and F.G. performed this study as partial fulfilment of their PhD in Cellular and Molecular Biology (L.C.) and in Molecular Medicine, Section of Basic and Applied Immunology, respectively, of the Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, School of Medicine, Milan, Italy.

This study was supported by the CARIPLO grant 2008-2230 (to G.P.) and by the grants n. 40H76, 40H18 ,and 40H11 (to G.P., E.V., and M.A., respectively) of the Program of AIDS research 2009–2010 of the Ministry of Health, Italy.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Back to Top | Article Outline


1. Goerdt S, Politz O, Schledzewski K, Birk R, Gratchev A, Guillot P, et al. Alternative versus classical activation of macrophages. Pathobiology 1999; 67:222–226.
2. Mills CD, Kincaid K, Alt JM, Heilman MJ, Hill AM. M-1/M-2 macrophages and the Th1/Th2 paradigm. J Immunol 2000; 164:6166–6173.
3. Mantovani A, Sica A, Sozzani S, Allavena P, Vecchi A, Locati M. The chemokine system in diverse forms of macrophage activation and polarization. Trends Immunol 2004; 25:677–686.
4. Gordon S, Taylor PR. Monocyte and macrophage heterogeneity. Nat Rev Immunol 2005; 5:953–964.
5. Porcheray F, Viaud S, Rimaniol AC, Leone C, Samah B, Dereuddre-Bosquet N, et al. Macrophage activation switching: an asset for the resolution of inflammation. Clin Exp Immunol 2005; 142:481–489.
6. Martinez FO, Gordon S, Locati M, Mantovani A. Transcriptional profiling of the human monocyte-to-macrophage differentiation and polarization: new molecules and patterns of gene expression. J Immunol 2006; 177:7303–7311.
7. Mantovani A, Locati M. Orchestration of macrophage polarization. Blood 2009; 114:3135–3136.
8. Cassol E, Cassetta L, Rizzi C, Alfano M, Poli G. M1 and M2a polarization of human monocyte-derived macrophages inhibits HIV-1 replication by distinct mechanisms. J Immunol 2009; 182:6237–6246.
9. Zhu T, Muthui D, Holte S, Nickle D, Feng F, Brodie S, et al. Evidence for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 replication in vivo in CD14(+) monocytes and its potential role as a source of virus in patients on highly active antiretroviral therapy. J Virol 2002; 76:707–716.
10. Xu Y, Zhu H, Wilcox CK, van’t Wout A, Andrus T, Llewellyn N, et al. Blood monocytes harbor HIV type 1 strains with diversified phenotypes including macrophage-specific CCR5 virus. J Infect Dis 2008; 197:309–318.
11. Cassol E, Alfano M, Biswas P, Poli G. Monocyte-derived macrophages and myeloid cell lines as targets of HIV-1 replication and persistence. J Leukoc Biol 2006; 80:1018–1030.
12. Cassol E, Cassetta L, Rizzi C, Gabuzda D, Alfano M, Poli G. Dendritic cell-specific ICAM-3 grabbing nonintegrin mediates HIV-1 infection of and transmission by M2a-polarized macrophages in vitro. AIDS 2013; 27:707–716.
13. Neagu MR, Ziegler P, Pertel T, Strambio-De-Castillia C, Grutter C, Martinetti G, et al. Potent inhibition of HIV-1 by TRIM5-cyclophilin fusion proteins engineered from human components. J Clin Invest 2009; 119:3035–3047.
14. He J, Choe S, Walker R, Di Marzio P, Morgan DO, Landau NR. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 viral protein R (Vpr) arrests cells in the G2 phase of the cell cycle by inhibiting p34cdc2 activity. J Virol 1995; 69:6705–6711.
15. Cassetta L, Fortunato O, Adduce L, Rizzi C, Hering J, Rovere-Querini P, et al. Extracellular high mobility group box-1 inhibits R5 and X4 HIV-1 strains replication in mononuclear phagocytes without induction of chemokines and cytokines. AIDS 2009; 23:567–577.
16. Cota M, Mengozzi M, Vicenzi E, Panina-Bordignon P, Sinigaglia F, Transidico P, et al. Selective inhibition of HIV replication in primary macrophages but not T lymphocytes by macrophage-derived chemokine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000; 97:9162–9167.
17. Fernie BF, Poli G, Fauci AS. Alpha interferon suppresses virion but not soluble human immunodeficiency virus antigen production in chronically infected T-lymphocytic cells. J Virol 1991; 65:3968–3971.
18. Monini P, Colombini S, Sturzl M, Goletti D, Cafaro A, Sgadari C, et al. Reactivation and persistence of human herpesvirus-8 infection in B cells and monocytes by Th-1 cytokines increased in Kaposi's sarcoma. Blood 1999; 93:4044–4058.
19. Vicenzi E, Panina-Bodignon P, Vallanti G, Di Lucia P, Poli G. Restricted replication of primary HIV-1 isolates using both CCR5 and CXCR4 in Th2 but not in Th1 CD4(+) T cells. J Leukoc Biol 2002; 72:913–920.
20. Collin M, Gordon S. The kinetics of human immunodeficiency virus reverse transcription are slower in primary human macrophages than in a lymphoid cell line. Virology 1994; 200:114–120.
21. Butler SL, Hansen MS, Bushman FD. A quantitative assay for HIV DNA integration in vivo. Nat Med 2001; 7:631–634.
22. Tan W, Dong Z, Wilkinson TA, Barbas CF 3rd, Chow SA. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 incorporated with fusion proteins consisting of integrase and the designed polydactyl zinc finger protein E2C can bias integration of viral DNA into a predetermined chromosomal region in human cells. J Virol 2006; 80:1939–1948.
23. Lusic M, Marcello A, Cereseto A, Giacca M. Regulation of HIV-1 gene expression by histone acetylation and factor recruitment at the LTR promoter. EMBO J 2003; 22:6550–6561.
24. Palmisano I, Della Chiara G, D’Ambrosio RL, Huichalaf C, Brambilla P, Corbetta S, et al. Amino acid starvation induces reactivation of silenced transgenes and latent HIV-1 provirus via down-regulation of histone deacetylase 4 (HDAC4). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012; 109:E2284–2293.
25. Peng G, Lei KJ, Jin W, Greenwell-Wild T, Wahl SM. Induction of APOBEC3 family proteins, a defensive maneuver underlying interferon-induced anti-HIV-1 activity. J Exp Med 2006; 203:41–46.
26. Boussetta T, Gougerot-Pocidalo MA, Hayem G, Ciappelloni S, Raad H, Arabi Derkawi R, et al. The prolyl isomerase Pin1 acts as a novel molecular switch for TNF-alpha-induced priming of the NADPH oxidase in human neutrophils. Blood 2010; 116:5795–5802.
27. Manganaro L, Lusic M, Gutierrez MI, Cereseto A, Del Sal G, Giacca M. Concerted action of cellular JNK and Pin1 restricts HIV-1 genome integration to activated CD4+ T lymphocytes. Nat Med 2010; 16:329–333.
28. Sheehy AM, Gaddis NC, Malim MH. The antiretroviral enzyme APOBEC3G is degraded by the proteasome in response to HIV-1 Vif. Nat Med 2003; 9:1404–1407.
29. Chiu YL, Soros VB, Kreisberg JF, Stopak K, Yonemoto W, Greene WC. Cellular APOBEC3G restricts HIV-1 infection in resting CD4+ T cells. Nature 2005; 435:108–114.
30. Newman EN, Holmes RK, Craig HM, Klein KC, Lingappa JR, Malim MH, et al. Antiviral function of APOBEC3G can be dissociated from cytidine deaminase activity. Curr Biol 2005; 15:166–170.
31. Mangeat B, Turelli P, Caron G, Friedli M, Perrin L, Trono D. Broad antiretroviral defence by human APOBEC3G through lethal editing of nascent reverse transcripts. Nature 2003; 424:99–103.
32. Narvaiza I, Linfesty DC, Greener BN, Hakata Y, Pintel DJ, Logue E, et al. Deaminase-independent inhibition of parvoviruses by the APOBEC3A cytidine deaminase. PLoS Pathog 2009; 5:e1000439.
33. Chen H, Lilley CE, Yu Q, Lee DV, Chou J, Narvaiza I, et al. APOBEC3A is a potent inhibitor of adeno-associated virus and retrotransposons. Curr Biol 2006; 16:480–485.
34. Koning FA, Goujon C, Bauby H, Malim MH. Target cell-mediated editing of HIV-1 cDNA by APOBEC3 proteins in human macrophages. J Virol 2011; 85:13448–13452.
35. Goila-Gaur R, Khan MA, Miyagi E, Kao S, Strebel K. Targeting APOBEC3A to the viral nucleoprotein complex confers antiviral activity. Retrovirology 2007; 4:61.
36. Berger G, Durand S, Fargier G, Nguyen XN, Cordeil S, Bouaziz S, et al. APOBEC3A is a specific inhibitor of the early phases of HIV-1 infection in myeloid cells. PLoS Pathog 2011; 7:e1002221.
37. Thielen BK, McNevin JP, McElrath MJ, Hunt BV, Klein KC, Lingappa JR. Innate immune signaling induces high levels of TC-specific deaminase activity in primary monocyte-derived cells through expression of APOBEC3A isoforms. J Biol Chem 2010; 285:27753–27766.
38. Stenglein MD, Burns MB, Li M, Lengyel J, Harris RS. APOBEC3 proteins mediate the clearance of foreign DNA from human cells. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2010; 17:222–229.
39. Peng G, Greenwell-Wild T, Nares S, Jin W, Lei KJ, Rangel ZG, et al. Myeloid differentiation and susceptibility to HIV-1 are linked to APOBEC3 expression. Blood 2007; 110:393–400.
40. Aguiar RS, Lovsin N, Tanuri A, Peterlin BM. Vpr.A3A chimera inhibits HIV replication. J Biol Chem 2008; 283:2518–2525.

APOBEC3A; APOBEC3G; cytokines; HIV-1; integration; M1 polarization; macrophage; transcription

© 2013 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.