Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

EPIDEMIOLOGY AND SOCIAL

Risk factors, barriers and facilitators for linkage to antiretroviral therapy care

a systematic review

Govindasamy, Darshinia; Ford, Nathanb,c; Kranzer, Katharinad

Author Information
doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3283578b9b

Abstract

Introduction

Scale-up of antiretroviral therapy (ART) over the last decade has been impressive, with 6.6 million receiving ART in low and middle-income countries [1]. But, overall ART coverage in sub-Saharan Africa remains low, at 49%, with major disparities between the eastern and southern region (56%) compared with the western and central region (30%), which is largely attributable to the difference in economic stability, effectiveness of HIV/AIDS programmes and domestic and donor support [2]. HIV-positive patients continue to delay entry to care, and consequently almost a quarter of patients die in their first year of treatment [3]. Hence, identification of interventions that can enrol more patients into care, earlier in their disease progression, is essential [3].

Data on the number of patients lost to follow-up prior to ART-initiation is not routinely collected and thus, it is challenging for national HIV/AIDS control programmes to provide accurate data on the extent of this problem [4]. However, one recent systematic review quantified the losses occurring between HIV testing and ART initiation in sub-Saharan Africa [5]. This study showed that patient attrition was highest in the pre-ART phase, with under half (46%) of individuals not yet eligible for ART retained in pre-ART care and just over two-thirds (68%) of ART-eligible individuals initiating ART [5]. Although such attrition is widely acknowledged as a major problem, risk factors for attrition are less well described, and few interventions have been evaluated to improve linkage to care. Given the current economic crisis, international AIDS donors need to invest strategically, particularly in areas with a potentially high economic return [6] such as linkage and retention in care [7]. This review summarizes the characteristics of patient and programme level factors associated with retention in care during the pre-ART period and linkage to ART care in sub-Saharan Africa.

Methods

We sought all studies reporting on risk factors, barriers and facilitators of retention (number of patients remaining in care), attrition (number of patients reported dead, lost to follow-up or who discontinued care) in the pre-ART period and linkage to care at three steps: ART eligibility assessment, pre-ART care, and ART initiation. Studies were omitted if they exclusively examined steps downstream from ART initiation such as retention or adherence, were done in the private healthcare sector, reported unsystematic observations (case reports and case series), or were secondary data sources (editorials and viewpoints). Studies were also excluded if they were of poor quality (i.e. outcome definition unclear, no adjustment of confounders, unreliable measurement tool used and no discussion of potential limitations). The search was limited to quantitative and qualitative studies conducted within sub-Saharan Africa, published in English between 01 January 2000 (the time when ART first became available in this region) [2] and 31 May 2011.

Two electronic databases (MEDLINE and Global Health) were searched using a compound search strategy (Web Appendix 1, https://links.lww.com/QAD/A239). Keywords were also searched in Africa-Wide Information and Google Scholar. Bibliographies of potentially eligible full text publication were searched. Conference abstracts were sought only for the years that abstract databases were available online [i.e. Conference on HIV Pathogenesis and Treatment of the International AIDS Society (IAS, 2001–2011), the Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI, 2006–2011), the International AIDS Conference (AIDS, 2001–2008) and AIDS Education Global Information System (AEGIS)]. Finally, experts in the field were contacted for recommended literature.

Potentially eligible studies were downloaded into RefWorks, and titles and abstracts were searched by two reviewers (D.G. and K.K.) according to the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Screening of articles taken through to full review was also performed in duplicate (D.G., K.K.). Conference abstracts were screened by title and full text. The data extraction and quality assessment form was adapted from the STROBE statement checklist [8].

Results

The search yielded a total of 768 citations, among which 32 were retained for review (Web Appendix 2, https://links.lww.com/QAD/A239). The majority of studies were conducted in South Africa (n = 16); the remainder were conducted in Uganda (n = 7), Kenya (n = 5), Malawi (n = 3), Ethiopia (n = 2), Tanzania (n = 2), Zambia (n = 2), Rwanda (n = 1), Swaziland (n = 1), Mozambique (n = 1), South Africa and Zimbabwe (n = 1) and South Africa and Kenya (n = 1). Most were semi-qualitative studies (n = 19); the remainder used either purely quantitative (n = 17) or qualitative (n = 6) methods.

Twenty studies examined predictors for retention and linkage in the pre-ART period (Table 1) [9–31]. These studies were conducted among home-based testers [9], female sex workers [10], patients accessing a mobile HIV testing service [15] and patients accessing public healthcare facilities [11–14,16–18,21–29,31]. The most common predictors for enrolling into HIV care were disclosing one's HIV-positive status [9,15], perceived poor health [9], and low CD4 count [15]. Commonly reported correlates for attrition between CD4 count testing and ART initiation included distance to a testing centre [13,16], cost of transport [29], male sex [16–18,23,24,27,31], younger age [18,19,22,25,31], having advanced immunodeficiency [20,22,24,26,27] and having lower levels of education [21,28].

T1-8
Table 1-a:
Factors influencing the patient continuum of HIV care.
T2-8
Table 1-b:
Factors influencing the patient continuum of HIV care.

Twenty-five studies examined barriers to accessing and remaining in HIV care (Web Appendix 3, https://links.lww.com/QAD/A239[32]), which were categorized into psychosocial, economic, health systems and medical barriers. The main reported psycho-social barriers were stigma and fear of disclosure [9,15,27,33–43], and fear of drug toxicities [15,27,34,36,39,41,42] (Table 2). Transport costs [14,27,34,35,37,38,40,42,44–47], distance to health facility [14,15,36,38,42,44,48], food shortage [36,37,39,41,44], patient-related time constraints [14,38] and employed patients unable to take time off work for clinic appointments [14,15,38,40,47,49] were the main reported economic barriers. Long clinic waiting times [33–36,38,44,45] and shortage of healthcare workers (HCWs) [36,43,44] were the main reported health systems barriers. The main medical barrier was having to complete TB therapy. Only one study, from Tanzania, examined facilitators to care and showed that the provision of referral letters to patients together with transport vouchers, community escorts and supportive counselling facilitated their linkage to care [37,50].

T3-8
Table 2:
Areas for intervention.

Discussion

There is a clear need to implement and evaluate interventions to retain patients in the period before they have started treatment, yet to date few such studies have been published. This literature review identified three major areas that are amenable to intervention and thus provide direction for future research for the exploration or validation of interventions to support patient retention along the care cascade.

We found that transport costs and distance were the main factors that impeded on a patient's continuity in HIV care. Transport vouchers, transport re-imbursements and a free patient transport system are viable methods to avert out-of-pocket payments for travel [51–53]. Integration [54,55] and decentralization [56–62] of ART care has been shown to be beneficial for patients receiving ART and may also improve access to care for pre-ART patients. In particular, the use of mobile units providing pre-ART services such as CD4 count monitoring and home-delivered ART [63] have been found to improve linkage to care.

The current study also found that lack of human resources was both a predictor and barrier to care and was reported by several studies. Task-shifting [56,57,64–68] has been shown to be effective in resource-constrained settings and thus may partially address staff shortages. Furthermore, financial incentives, career development programmes, enhanced management, personal recognition and improved working conditions are critical for retaining and sustaining HCWs in the public-sector in order to have the human resources to retain patients in care [69,70]. This review showed that long waiting times was a commonly reported barrier to care. These could be potentially eliminated through a systematic patient appointment system, less frequent patient visits, and less frequent dispensing schedules, including community-based dispensing which has been found to reduce patient attrition on ART [71]. Results from several studies have shown that most patients who undergo CD4 count testing fail to return to their healthcare facility for their results [11–14] and this is mainly to avoid accruing transports costs and waiting in long clinic queues [38,44]. Recent data has shown that point-of-care (POC) CD4 count technology is effective in reducing losses associated with CD4 count testing completion in both South Africa [72] and Mozambique [73] as this reduces the number of visits a patient has to make to the healthcare facility. Moreover, a study conducted in a mobile clinic setting in South Africa showed that patients receiving rapid CD4 count results were more likely to link to care in comparison to those who did not [74].

Disclosure was positively associated with enrolment into HIV care and uptake of ART in two studies conducted in Kenya [9,30]. Of note, stigma and fear of disclosure was the most commonly reported psycho-social barriers to care. These findings highlight the need for stronger posttest counselling, community escorts, patient support groups and empowerment programmes for people living with HIV/AIDS to improve linkage to care. Fear of drug toxicity was the second most commonly reported psycho-social barrier which underscores the need for newer drugs with better safety profiles such as switching from stavudine to tenofovir-based first-line regimens [75–77] and for improving treatment literacy programmes to assist in patient acceptance and compliance of ART.

The results from this review indicate that multiple interventions are required to cater to various groups of individuals at risk for attrition. Inconvenient clinic hours make it difficult for the working population to access public healthcare facilities, underscoring the need for scale-up of after-hour clinics or workplace programmes [78]. Men and younger patients were shown to be at risk for attrition in the pre-ART period, with similar results reported from ART programs [79–81], and point to the need for dedicated clinics and support programmes for men and adolescents. The possibility of expanding ART initiation criteria in the coming years could result in large numbers of ART-eligible patients being added onto an already weakened HIV care pathway and consequently higher rates of attrition [4], thus strengthening of the cascade is fundamental [82]. Universal testing and treatment yields large long-term dividends [83]. However, the benefits of this strategy have been shown to double by increasing linkage to care and preventing patient attrition [84]. Furthermore, strategies to prevent loss to follow-up such as transport reimbursements and improving HCW training has been shown to be cost-effective [85]. In light of the global financial crisis, it is evident that investment in these strategies could possibly result in substantial savings in the long-run [7].

There are several limitations to the evidence base. Considerable variability in outcome definitions made it challenging to compare data between studies. The sample size of some studies was small [15,21,22]. The majority of studies were from South Africa, potentially limiting generalizability of some findings. It was difficult to amalgamate data as some were focused on specific groups (i.e. female sex workers [10], home-based testers [9], mobile clinic testers [15] and pregnant women [30]) and others on specific settings (i.e. semi-private hospitals [23,24] and paediatric ART clinics [43]). Most studies obtained data retrospectively, resulting in substantial missing data. Finally, certain findings may have been prone to social desirability bias as some studies were based on self-reports only [9,22].

There are also two major limitations to the conduct of our review. First, programme experiences from resource-constrained settings may be less likely to be published (particularly if the results are not favourable), or more likely to be published in local journals that are not indexed in major databases [86]. Such potential publication bias may explain why most evidence comes from South Africa, a better-resourced country with a substantial research capacity. Second, our search strategy was restricted to publications only in English. This is unlikely to be a major limitation given our geographical scope, but may explain the paucity of studies from Francophone and Lusophone Africa. The strengths of this review are that an extensive search strategy was employed; only peer-reviewed published studies were included; conference abstracts were included; and both qualitative and quantitative studies were reviewed.

This review provides some direction for the piloting of interventions that could improve linkage to HIV and ART care and reduce attrition in the pre-ART period. In particular, future studies should examine interventions that could potentially reduce out-of pocket payment for transport and minimize the travel to clinics for patients. The results from this review further underscore the need for task-shifting, decentralization of care, and integration of services to alleviate current health system barriers (i.e. shortage of health personnel and long waiting queues). Stigma and fear of disclosure was found to among the main psycho-social barriers to care and thus urgent interventions such as support groups and intense posttest counselling are warranted.

In conclusion, no single intervention is likely going to be sufficient to solve the high rates of attrition that are currently being reported by ART programmes in sub-Saharan Africa. Rather, a combination of interventions may be needed to respond to different contexts and support specific groups of patients who are at particularly high risk of defaulting from care.

Acknowledgements

D.G. and K.K. performed the electronic search, identified eligible studies as well as collated and analysed the data. N.F. assisted in analysing and interpreting the data. D.G. wrote the first draft. All authors contributed to subsequent drafts. All authors have read and approved the final draft.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

1. UNAIDS. World AIDS Day report 2011. http://www.unaids.org/en/media/unaids/contentassets/documents/unaidspublication/2011/JC2216_WorldAIDSday_report_2011_en.pdf. [Accessed on 27 January 2012].
2. Global HIV/AIDS Response. Progress Report 2011. http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/progress_report2011/hiv_full_report_2011.pdf. [Accessed on 13 March 2012].
3. Lawn SD, Harries AD, Anglaret X, Myer L, Wood R. Early mortality among adults accessing antiretroviral treatment programmes in sub-Saharan Africa. AIDS 2008; 22:1897–1908.
4. WHO. Retention in HIV programmes. Defining the challenges and identifying solutions. Meeting Report. 2011. http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/meetingreports/retention_programmes/en/index.html. [Accessed on 12 June 2012].
5. Rosen S, Fox M. Retention HIV care between testing and treatment in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review.PLoS Medicine 2011; 8:e1001056.
6. Schwartländer B, Stover J, Hallett T, Atun R, Avila C, Gouws E, et al. Towards an improved investment approach for an effective response to HIV/AIDS. Lancet 2011; 377:2031–2041.
7. Bisson GP, Stringer JSA. Lost but not forgotten – the economics of improving patient retention in AIDS treatment programs.PLoS Medicine 2009; 6:e1000174.
8. Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiolgy (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Bull World Health Organ 2007; 85:867–872.
9. Amolloh M, Medley A, Owuor P, Audi B, Sewe M, Multai H, et al.Factors associated with early uptake of HIV care and treatment services after testing HIV-positive during home based testing and counseling (HBTC) in rural Western Kenya. 18TH Conference of Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections. Boston, USA; 2011. Abstract no. 1077.
10. Braunstein SL, Umulisa MM, Veldhuijzen NJ, Kestelyn E, Ingabire CM, Nyinawabega J, et al. HIV diagnosis, linkage to HIV care, and HIV risk behaviors among newly-diagnosed HIV positive female sex workers in Kigali, Rwanda. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2011; 57:70–76.
11. Kranzer K, Zeinecker J, Ginsberg P, Orrell C, Kalaw NN, Lawn SD, et al. Linkage to HIV care and antiretroviral therapy in Cape Town, South Africa. PLoS One 2010; 5:e13801.
12. Larson BA, Brennan A, McNamara L, Long L, Rosen S, Sanne I, et al. Early loss to follow up after enrolment in pre-ART care at a large public clinic in Johannesburg, South Africa. Trop Med Int Health 2010; 151:43–47.
13. Losina E, Bassett IV, Giddy J, Chetty S, Regan S, Walensky RP, et al. The ‘ART’ of linkage: pretreatment loss to care after HIV diagnosis at two PEPFAR sites in Durban, South Africa. PLoS One 2010; 5:e9538.
14. Naidoo N, Faal M, Venter F, Osih R. Patient retention – reasons why patients do or do not come back to care after HIV testing. 18TH International AIDS conference. Vienna, Austria; 2010. Abtract no. 1076.
15. Govindasamy D, van Schaik N, Kranzer K, Wood R, Mathews C, Bekker LG. Linkage to HIV care from a mobile testing unit in South Africa by different CD4 count strata. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2011; 58:344–352.
16. Ingle SM, May M, Uebel K, Timmerman V, Kotze E, Bachmann M, et al. Outcomes in patients waiting for antiretroviral treatment in the Free State Province, South Africa: prospective linkage study. AIDS 2010; 24:2717–2725.
17. Nakigozi G, Makumbi F, Reynolds S, Galiwango R, Kagaayi J, Nalugoda F, et al.Nonenrolment into a free HIV care program: findings from a population-based study in Rakai, Uganda. XVIII International AIDS Conference. Vienna, Austria; 2010. Abstract no. WEPE0769.
18. Lessells RJ, Mutevedzi PC, Cooke GS, Newell ML. Retention in HIV care for individuals not yet eligible for antiretroviral therapy: rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2011; 56:e79–e86.
19. Evangeli M, Newell ML, Richter L, Marchant T, McGrath NM. Stigma and attrition within an HIV treatment and care programme in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. 19th International AIDS Conference, Rome, Italy; 2011. Abstract no. MOPE47.
20. Mulissa Z, Jerene D, Lindtjorn B. Patients present earlier and survival has improved, but pre-ART attrition is high in a six-year HIV cohort data from Ethiopia. PLoS One 2010; 5:e13268.
21. Karcher H, Omondi A, Odera J, Kunz A, Harms G. Risk factors for treatment denial and loss to follow-up in an antiretroviral treatment cohort in Kenya. Trop Med Int Health 2007; 12:687–694.
22. Tayler-Smith K, Zachariah R, Massaquoi M, Manzi M, Pasulani O, van den Akker T, et al. Demographic characteristics and opportunistic diseases associated with attrition during preparation for antiretroviral therapy in primary health centres in Kibera, Kenya. Trop Med Int Health 2011; 16:579–584.
23. Bassett IV, Regan S, Chetty S, Giddy J, Uhler LM, Holst H, et al. Who starts antiretroviral therapy in Durban, South Africa?... not everyone who should. AIDS 2010; 24:37–44.
24. Bassett IV, Wang B, Chetty S, Mazibuko M, Bearnot B, Giddy J, et al. Loss to care and death before antiretroviral therapy in Durban, South Africa. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2009; 51:135–139.
25. Kaplan R, Orrell C, Zwane E, Bekker LG, Wood R. Loss to follow-up and mortality among pregnant women referred to a community clinic for antiretroviral treatment. AIDS 2008; 22:1679–1681.
26. Lawn SD, Myer L, Harling G, Orrell C, Bekker LG, Wood R. Determinants of mortality and nondeath losses from an antiretroviral treatment service in South Africa: implications for program evaluation. Clin Infect Dis 2006; 43:770–776.
27. Amuron B, Namara G, Birungi J, Nabiryo C, Levin J, Grosskurth H, et al. Mortality and loss-to-follow-up during the pretreatment period in an antiretroviral therapy programme under normal health service conditions in Uganda. BMC Public Health 2009; 9:1–6.
28. McGrath N, Glynn JR, Saul J, Kranzer K, Jahn A, Mwaungulu F, et al. What happens to ART-eligible patients who do not start ART? Dropout between screening and ART initiation: a cohort study in Karonga, Malawi. BMC Public Health 2010; 10:1–8.
29. Zachariah R, Harries AD, Manzi M, Fitzerland M, Labana S, Chinji C, et al. Acceptance of antiretroviral therapy among patients infected with HIV and tuberculosis in rural Malawi is low and associated with cost of transport. PLoS One 2006; 1:e121.
30. Nolan M, Gips A, Phillips L, Kweyu N, Simba M, Gwarinda S. Mothers2mothers – Kenyan clients who are supported to disclose their status and access support have improved PMTCT outcomes towards achieving virtual elimination of pediatric HIV/AIDS. 19th International AIDS Conference, Rome, Italy; 2011. Abstract no. TUPE302.
31. Pepper DJ, Marais S, Wilkinson RJ, Bhaijee F, de Azevedo V, Meintjes G. Barriers to initiation of antiretroviral therapy during tuberculosis therapy in Africa. PLoS One 2011; 6:e19484.
32. Akello M, Muldoon K, Achan E, Muzaaya G, Birungi J, Shannon K. Gender-based violence as a critical barrier to antiretroviral treatment access and adherence among HIV-positive women in Gulu, Northern Uganda. 19th International AIDS Conference, Rome, Italy; 2011. Abstract no. CDD227.
33. Luseno W, Wechsberg W, Middlesteadt-Ellerson R, Gumula W. Linkages and barriers to care for high-risk South African women testing positive for HIV. AIDS 2008 – XVII International AIDS Conference. Mexico City, Mexico; 2008. Abstract no. TUPE0209.
34. McGuire M, Munyenyembe T, Szumilin E, Heinzelmann A, Le Paih M, Bouithy N, et al. Vital status of pre-ART and ART patients defaulting from care in rural Malawi. Trop Med Int Health 2010; 151:55–62.
35. Duff P, Kipp W, Wild TC, Rubaale T, Okech-Ojony J. Barriers to accessing highly active antiretroviral therapy by HIV-positive women attending an antenatal clinic in a regional hospital in western Uganda. J Int AIDS Soc 2010; 13:1–9.
36. Kunihira N, Nuwaha F, Mayanja R, Peterson S. Barriers to use of antiretroviral drugs in Rakai district of Uganda. Afr Health Sci 2010; 10:120–129.
37. Mshana GH, Wamoyi J, Busza J, Zaba B, Changalucha J, Kaluvya S, et al. Barriers to accessing antiretroviral therapy in Kisesa, Tanzania: a qualitative study of early rural referrals to the national program. AIDS Patient Care STDS 2006; 20:649–657.
38. Fox MP, Mazimba A, Seidenberg P, Crooks D, Sikateyo B, Rosen S. Barriers to initiation of antiretroviral treatment in rural and urban areas of Zambia: a cross-sectional study of cost, stigma, and perceptions about ART. J Int AIDS Soc 2010; 13:1–11.
39. Murray LK, Semraua K, McCurleya E, Thea DM, Scott N, Mwiya M, et al. Barriers to acceptance and adherence of antiretroviral therapy in urban Zambian women: a qualitative study. AIDS Care 2009; 21:1–14.
40. Nunu RP, Nkambule L, Kamiru H, Vandelanotte J, Preko JP, Mamvura C, et al.Using phone follow-up system to understand barriers to ART initiation at Good Shepherd Hospital in Swaziland. 18th International AIDS Conference, Vienna, Austria; 2010. Abstract no. MOPE0922.
41. Unge C, Johansson A, Zachariah R, Somec D, van Engelgemc I, Ekstrom AM, et al. Reasons for unsatisfactory acceptance of antiretroviral treatment in the urban Kibera slum, Kenya. AIDS Care 2008; 20:146–149.
42. Assefa Y, Van Damme W, Mariam DH, Kloos H. Toward universal access to HIV counseling and testing and antiretroviral treatment in Ethiopia: looking beyond HIV testing and ART initiation. AIDS Patient Care STDS 2010; 24:521–525.
43. Feucht UD, Kinzer M, Kruger M. Reasons for delay in initiation of antiretroviral therapy in a population of HIV-infected South African children. J Trop Pediatr 2007; 53:398–402.
44. Posse M, Baltussen R. Barriers to access to antiretroviral treatment in Mozambique, as perceived by patients and health workers in urban and rural settings. AIDS Patient Care STDS 2009; 23:867–875.
45. Lubega M, Nsabagasani X, Tumwesigaye NM, Wabwire-Mangen F, Ekström AM, Pariyo G, et al. Policy and practice, lost in transition: Reasons for high drop-out from preantiretroviral care in resource poor settings of eastern Uganda. Health Policy 2010; 95:153–158.
46. Parkes R, Namakoola I, Todd J, Kalanzi I, HIarlaithe MO, Mugisha NK, et al.Barriers to rapid initiation of ART in a cohort of HIV positive Ugandan adults with CD4 counts less than 200. 16th International AIDS Conference. Toronto, Canada; 2006. Abstract no. WePE0079.
47. Clouse K, Montgomery ET, Milford C, Watadzaushe C, Nkala B, Fancher H, et al. MIRA Standard of Care program. Establishing a continuum of care between HIV prevention trials and public healthcare systems: The MIRA Standard of Care program. Clin Trials 2010; 7:256–264.
48. Corneli A, McKenna K, Agot K, Ahmed K, Odhiambo J, Skhosana J, et al.Referral care access among participants who seroconvert in a phase III HIV prevention clinical trial. 19th International AIDS Conference, Rome, Italy; 2011. Abstract no. MOPE386.
49. Bianchi F, Ncube S. Tracking pre-ART defaulters in Region F, Johannesburg: understanding why patients are lost-to-initiation while improving a patient follow-up programme. 18th International AIDS Conference, Vienna, Austria; 2010. Abstract no. CDE1188.
50. Nsigaye R, Wringe A, Roura M, Kalluvya S, Urassa M, Busza J, et al. From HIV diagnosis to treatment: evaluation of a referral system to promote and monitor access to antiretroviral therapy in rural Tanzania. J Int AIDS Soc 2009; 12:1–9.
51. Wenkel J, van den Boogard W, O’brian D, Standaert EB, Braker K, Olaiya MA, et al.Adverse consequences of user fees for patients started on antiretroviral therapy (ART) in the governmental HIV-programs in Nigeria. XVI International AIDS conference. Toronto, Canada; 2006.
52. Dahab M, Kielmann K, Charalambous S, Karstaedt AS, Hamilton R, La Grange L, et al. Contrasting reasons for discontinuation of antiretroviral therapy in workplace and public-sector HIV programs in South Africa. AIDS Patient Care STDS 2011; 25:53–59.
53. Geng EH, Bangsberg DR, Musinguzi N, Emenyonu N, Bwana MB, Yiannoutsos CT, et al. Understanding reasons for and outcomes of patients lost to follow-up in antiretroviral therapy programs in Africa through a sampling-based approach. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2010; 53:405–411.
54. Topp SM, Chipukuma JM, Giganti M, Mwango LK, Chiko LM, Tambatamba-Chapula B, et al. Strengthening health systems at facility-level: feasibility of integrating antiretroviral therapy into primary healthcare services in Lusaka, Zambia. PLoS One 2010; 5:e11522.
55. Tudor Car L, van-Velthoven MH, Brusamento S, Elmoniry H, Car J, Majeed A, et al.Integrating prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission (PMTCT) programmes with other health services for preventing HIV infection and improving HIV outcomes in developing countries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; 6:CD008741.
56. Cohen R, Lynch S, Bygrave H, Eggers E, Vlahakis N, Hilderbrand K, et al. Antiretroviral treatment outcomes from a nurse-driven, community-supported HIV/AIDS treatment programme in rural Lesotho: observational cohort assessment at two years. J Int AIDS Soc 2009; 12:23.
57. Fatti G, Grimwood A, Bock P. Better antiretroviral therapy outcomes at primary healthcare facilities: an evaluation of three tiers of ART services in four South African provinces. PLoS One 2010; 5:e12888.
58. Brennan A, Long L, Maskew M, Sanne I, Jaffray I, Macphail P, et al. Outcomes of stable HIV-positive patients down-referred from doctor-managed ART clinics to nurse-managed primary health clinics for monitoring and treatment. AIDS 2011; 25:2027–2036.
59. Bedelu M, Ford N, Hilderbrand K, Reuter H. Implementing antiretroviral therapy in rural communities: the Lusikisiki model of decentralized HIV/AIDS care. J Infect Dis 2007; 196:S464–468.
60. Boyles TH, Wilkinson LS, Leisegang R, Maartens G. Factors influencing retention in care after starting antriretroviral therapy in a rural South African programme. PLoS One 2010; 6:e19201.
61. Bemelmans M, van Den Akker T, Ford N, Philips M, Zachariah R, Harries A, et al. Providing universal access to antiretroviral therapy in Thyolo, Malawi through task shifting and decentralization of HIV/AIDS care. Trop Med Int Health 2010; 15:1413–1420.
62. Chan AK, Mateyu G, Jahn A, Schouten E, Arora P, Mlotha W, et al. Outcome assessment of decentralization of antiretroviral therapy provision in a rural district of Malawi using an integrated primary care model. Trop Med Int Health 2010; 15:90–97.
63. Jaffar S, Amuron B, Foster S, Birungi J, Levin J, Namara G, et al. Rates of virological failure in patients treated in a home-based versus a facility-based HIV-care model in Jinja, southeast Uganda: a cluster-randomised equivalence trial. Lancet 2009; 374:2080–2089.
64. Sanne I, Orrell C, Fox MP, Conradie F, Ive P, Zeinecker J, et al. Nurse versus doctor management of HIV-infected patients receiving antiretroviral therapy (CIPRA-SA): a randomised noninferiority trial. Lancet 2010; 376:33–40.
65. Selke HM, Kimaiyo S, Sidle JE, Vedanthan R, Tierney WM, Shen C, et al. Task-shifting of antiretroviral delivery from healthcare workers to persons living with HIV/AIDS: clinical outcomes of a community-based program in Kenya. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2010; 55:483–490.
66. Long L, Brennan A, Fox MP, Ndibongo B, Jaffray I, Sanne I, et al. Treatment Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Shifting Management of Stable ART Patients to Nurses in South Africa: An Observational Cohort. PLoS Med 2011; 8:e1001055.
67. Bolton-Moore C, Mubiana-Mbewe M, Cantrell RA, Chintu N, Stringer EM, Chi BH, et al. Clinical outcomes and CD4 cell response in children receiving antiretroviral therapy at primary healthcare facilities in Zambia. JAMA 2007; 298:1888–1899.
68. Torpey KE, Kabaso ME, Mutale LN, Kamanga MK, Mwango AJ, Simpungwe J, et al. Adherence support workers: a way to address human resource constraints in antiretroviral treatment programs in the public health setting in Zambia. PLoS One 2008; 3:e2204.
69. Willis-Shattuck M, Bidwell P, Thomas S, Wyness L, Blaauw D, Ditlopo P. Motivation and retention of health workers in developing countries: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 2008; 8:247.
70. Zachariah R, Ford N, Philips M, Lynch S, Massaquoi M, Janssens V, et al. Task shifting in HIV/AIDS: opportunities, challenges and proposed actions for sub-Saharan Africa. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2009; 103:549–558.
71. Decroo T, Telfer B, Biot M, Maikere J, Dezembro S, Cumba LI, et al. Distribution of antiretroviral treatment through self-forming groups of patients in Tete province, Mozambique. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2011; 56:39–44.
72. Faal M, Naidoo N, Makgamatha L, Venter WD, Osih R. Effect of an immediate CD4 result during VCT on patient retention in ART. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2011; 58:54–59.
73. Jani I, Sitoe N, Alfai E, Chongo P, Lehe J, Rocha B, et al. Effect of point-of-care CD4 cell count tests on retention of patients and rates of antiretroviral therapy initiation in primary health clinics: an observational study. Lancet 2011; 378:1572–1579.
74. Larson B, Bistline K, Ndibongo B, Xulu T, Brennan A, Long L, et al.Rapid point-of-care CD4 testing at mobile HIV testing sites to increase linkage to care: an evaluation of a pilot program in South Africa. 6th International AIDS Society Conference on HIV Pathogenesis, Treatment and Prevention. Rome, Italy; 2011. Abstract no. MOAD0103.
75. WHO. WHO rapid advice: antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection in adults and adolescents. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2009. http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/guidelines/artadultguidelines.pdf. [Accessed on 15 March 2012].
76. Ford N, Calmy A. Improving first-line antiretroviral therapy in resource limited settings. Curr Opin HIV AIDS 2010; 5:38–47.
77. Jouquet G, Bygrave H, Kranzer K, Ford N, Gadot L, Lee J. Cost and Cost-Effectiveness of Switching From d4T or AZT to a TDF-Based First-Line Regimen in a Resource-Limited Setting in Rural Lesotho. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2011; 58:68–74.
78. Charalambous S, Grant AD, Day JH, Pemba L, Chaisson RE, Kruger P, et al. Establishing a workplace antiretroviral therapy programme in South Africa. AIDS Care 2007; 19:34–41.
79. Kranzer K, Lewis JJ, Ford N, Zeinecker J, Orrell C, Lawn SD, et al. Treatment interruption in a primary care antiretroviral therapy program in South Africa: cohort analysis of trends and risk factors. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2010; 55:e17–e23.
80. Cornell M, Myer L, Kaplan R, Bekker LG, Wood R. The impact of gender and income on survival and retention in a South African antiretroviral therapy programme. Trop Med Int Health 2009; 14:722–731.
81. MacPherson P, Moshabela M, Martinson N, Pronyk P. Mortality and loss to follow-up among HAART initiators in rural South Africa. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2009; 103:588–593.
82. Gardner EM, McLees MP, Steiner JF, Del Rio C, Burman WJ. The spectrum of engagement in HIV care and its relevance to test-and-treat strategies for prevention of HIV infection. Clin Infect Dis 2011; 52:793–800.
83. Ventelou B, Arrighi Y, Greener R, Lamontagne E. The macroeconomic consequences of renouncing to universal access to antiretroviral treatment for HIV in Africa: a micro-simulation model. PLoS One. 2012; 7:e34101.
84. Bendavid E, Brandeau ML, Wood R, Owens DK. Comparative effectiveness of HIV testing and treatment in highly endemic regions. Arch Intern Med 2010; 170:1347–1354.
85. Losina E, Touré H, Uhler LM, Anglaret X, Paltiel AD, Balestre E, et al.Cost-effectiveness of preventing loss to follow-up in HIV Treatment Programs: a Côte d’Ivoire appraisal. PLoS Medicine. 2009; 6:11:e1000173.
86. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Montori V, Vist G, Kunz R, Brozek J, et al. GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence-publication bias. J Clin Epidemiol 2011; 64:1277–1282.
Keywords:

AIDS; antiretroviral therapy; attrition; continuity of patient care; HIV; lost to follow-up; retention; sub-Saharan Africa

Supplemental Digital Content

© 2012 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.