Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

EDITORIAL COMMENTS

Antiretrovirals for safer conception for HIV-negative women and their HIV-1-infected male partners: how safe and how available?

Mastro, Timothy D.a; Cohen, Myron S.b; Rees, Helenc

Author Information
doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32834c4c62

We have entered a new era in which antiretroviral agents have been demonstrated to be highly effective in preventing HIV-1 infection, especially in serodiscordant couples. The HPTN-052 randomized, controlled trial (RCT) of early versus delayed antiretroviral therapy (ART) for the HIV-1-infected persons in sexual partnerships with HIV-negative persons demonstrated at least a 96% reduction in HIV-1 transmission in the 1763 couples studied in Africa, Asia and South America [1]. The Partners PrEP RCT, conducted among 4758 HIV-1-serodiscordant couples in Kenya and Uganda, showed that when used as preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) by the HIV-negative partner, daily tenofovir disproxil fumerate (TDF) and daily TDF/emtricitabine (FTC) were 62 and 73% effective, respectively, in preventing HIV-1 acquisition [2]. These robust effectiveness findings provide a strong basis for the use of antiretroviral agents for prevention, both to reduce the infectiousness of HIV-1-infected persons and to reduce the susceptibility of HIV-negative persons.

In this issue of AIDS, Vernazza et al. [3] described their work with HIV-negative women and their HIV-1-infected male partners who attempted to conceive through intercourse scheduled at the time of maximum fertility, determined by luteinizing hormone measurement. To reduce the risk of HIV-1 transmission during sex, men were treated with ART that led to undetectable HIV RNA in plasma (<50 copies/ml) for at least 6 months and there were no active genital infections. Women were provided two doses of PrEP (either TDF or TDF/FTC) to take 12 and 36 h before intercourse. Couples in this cohort could have multiple episodes of timed intercourse per attempted conception. Altogether, 53 partnerships (including seven couples twice) had 244 documented episodes of vaginal intercourse without barrier methods; no woman became HIV-1-infected. Overall, the successful conception rate was 75%, including 26% for the first attempt and 66% after five attempts. Older women were less likely to conceive.

Antiretroviral therapy has rendered HIV a treatable condition and people on effective therapy can have a life expectancy that approaches that of HIV-uninfected people [4,5]. Not surprisingly, an increasing number of people in HIV-1-discordant partnerships desire conception [6–8]. The current study by Vernazza et al. raises several important issues, two that are especially critical. First, how safe is this method of timed intercourse, employing ART and PrEP to prevent HIV infection; and second, how can these findings be translated to allow safe conception for the growing number of HIV-negative women in the world with HIV-1-infected partners?

The precise risk of HIV-1 acquisition associated with conception under these conditions remains impossible to quantify. However, the 96% reduction in HIV-1 transmission documented in the HPTN 052 RCT provides a strong rationale for this approach [1]. It is important to note that the only HIV-1 transmission event that occurred in HPTN 052 while the index partner was on ART occurred soon after the initiation of ART, before there was complete viral suppression [9]. The Partners PrEP findings of 62 and 73% reductions in HIV acquisition on antiretroviral PrEP strengthen the basis for this approach [2], although the optimal PrEP regimen for safer conception remains to be established. Taken together, these results are reassuring and should give HIV-discordant couples worldwide new options for safer conception.

We must, however, approach this opportunity with transparency and caution. Vernazza et al. [3] described a conception algorithm, not a clinical trial result. As the author indicates, all we can do is provide couples with the best available risk estimations under idealized conditions. Whereas this approach may render conception safer, ongoing intercourse during pregnancy by the female partner or a partner outside the relationship holds considerable risk. Pregnant women appear to have increased susceptibility to HIV-1 [10] and HIV-1 acquisition outside of the primary relationship occurred commonly in other studies of discordant couples [1,11]. Moreover, the suppression of HIV-1 in the male genital tract is incomplete even when blood viral levels are below detection [12]; the importance of such residual virus to HIV transmission is unknown. And finally, it will be very difficult to prove that neither partner has acquired a genital infection during the conception cycle; other sexually transmitted infections increase the risk for HIV-1 transmission [13,14]. Our obligation is to provide this information to discordant couples in a clear and transparent way and to provide counseling and clinical support to allow couples to decide whether or not to use these new tools to make conception as safe as possible.

The current study was conducted in the richly resourced setting of Switzerland [3]. Many challenges must be considered when attempting to translate this approach to the resource-limited countries where the vast majority of HIV-1-discordant couples live. Few clinical settings in such countries, especially in Africa, are currently prepared to provide the support necessary to minimize HIV-1 transmission risk during conception. Meanwhile, clinicians globally require management guidelines that will allow appropriate intervention for HIV-serodiscordant couples [15,16]. In South Africa, fertility guidelines have been developed by the HIV Clinicians Society to assist clinicians in low and medium-resourced settings [17].

Whereas ART and PrEP are promising tools for safer conception for HIV-serodiscordant couples, their effective use will require an understanding of the social dynamics of women in diverse settings as well as specialized facilities and programs in healthcare systems. Such systems will include couples’ HIV counseling and testing, fertility counseling and comprehensive HIV prevention services preconception and postconception. The promise of safe conception for HIV-serodiscordant couples provides yet another good reason for people to learn their HIV status and, if HIV-infected, access prevention, care and treatment programs.

The era of antiretroviral agents for prevention offers great hope for our ability to limit HIV transmission and end the pandemic [18]. Safe conception is the desire and dream of many women in communities affected by HIV including those in known discordant partnerships. ART and PrEP can contribute greatly to safer conception; however, we have much to do to learn how best to employ these powerful tools and strengthen the systems in resource-limited settings to allow women and couples to benefit maximally.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Ward Cates, Laneta Dorflinger and Kavita Nanda for review of the manuscript.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

1. Cohen MS, Chen YQ, McCauley M, Gamble T, Hosseinipour MC, Kumarasamy N, et al.Prevention of HIV-1 infection with early antiretroviral therapy.N Engl J Med 2011; 265:493–505.
2. Baeten J, Donnell D, Celum C. Preexposure prophylaxis with antiretroviral drugs in men and women in Africa. In: The 6th IAS Conference on HIV Pathogenesis, Treatment and Prevention; Rome, Italy; 18 July 2011.
3. Vernazza PL, Graf I, Sonnenberg-Schwan U, Geit M, Meurer A. Preexposure prophylaxis and timed intercourse for HIV-discordant couples willing to conceive a child.AIDS 2011; 25:2005–2008.
4. Gulick RM. Antiretroviral treatment 2010: progress and controversies. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2010; 55 (Suppl 1):S43–S48.
5. Walensky RP, Wood R, Ciaranello AL, Paltiel AD, Lorenzana SB, Anglaret X, et al. Scaling up the 2010 World Health Organization HIV Treatment Guidelines in resource-limited settings: a model-based analysis. PLoS Med 2010; 7:e1000382.
6. Schwartz SR, Mehta SH, Taha TE, Rees HV, Venter F, Black V. High pregnancy intentions and missed opportunities for patient-provider communication about fertility in a South African cohort of HIV-positive women on antiretroviral therapy.AIDS Behav 2011 [Epub ahead of print].
7. McClellan MK, Patel R, Kadzirange G, Chipatod T, Katzenstein D. Fertility desires and condom use among HIV-positive women at an antiretroviral roll-out program in Zimbabwe. Afr J Reprod Health 2010; 14:27–35.
8. Homsy J, Bunnell R, Moore D, King R, Malamba S, Nakityo R, et al. Reproductive intentions and outcomes among women on antiretroviral therapy in rural Uganda: a prospective cohort study. PLoS One 2009; 4:e4149.
9. Cohen MS. HPTN 052. In The 6th IAS Conference on HIV Pathogenesis, Treatment and Prevention; Rome, Italy; 18 July 2011.
10. Mugo NR, Med M, Heffron R, Donnell D, Wald A, Were EO, et al.Increased risk of HIV-1 transmission in pregnancy: a prospective study among African HIV-1 serodiscordant couples.AIDS 2011 [Epub ahead of print].
11. Celum C, Wald A, Lingappa JR, Magaret AS, Wang RS, Mugo N, et al. Acyclovir and transmission of HIV-1 from persons infected with HIV-1 and HSV-2. N Engl J Med 2010; 362:427–439.
12. Baeten JM, Kahle E, Lingappa JR, Coombs RW, Delany-Moretlwe S, Nakku-Joloba E, et al. Genital HIV-1 RNA predicts risk of heterosexual HIV-1 transmission. Sci Transl Med 2011; 3:77ra29.
13. Fleming DT, Wasserheit JN. From epidemiological synergy to public health policy and practice: the contribution of other sexually transmitted diseases to sexual transmission of HIV infection. Sex Transm Infect 1999; 75:3–17.
14. Galvin SR, Cohen MS. The role of sexually transmitted diseases in HIV transmission. Nat Rev Microbiol 2004; 2:33–42.
15. Matthews LT, Baeten JM, Celum C, Bangsberg DR. Periconception preexposure prophylaxis to prevent HIV transmission: benefits, risks, and challenges to implementation. AIDS 2010; 24:1975–1982.
16. Lampe MA, Smith DK, Anderson GJ, Edwards AE, Nesheim SR. Achieving safe conception in HIV-discordant couples: the potential role of oral preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in the United States.Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 204:488.e1–8.
17. Bekker L-G, Black V, Myer L, Rees H, Cooper D, Mall S, et al. Guidelines on safer conception in fertile HIV-infected individuals and couples. S African J HIV Med 2011; 31–44.
18. Karim SS, Karim QA. Antiretroviral prophylaxis: a defining moment in HIV control.Lancet 2011 July 17 [Epub ahead of print].
Keywords:

conception; discordant couples; preexposure prophylaxis; sexual transmission; therapy

© 2011 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.