Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Increased risk of HIV-1 transmission in pregnancy: a prospective study among African HIV-1-serodiscordant couples

Mugo, Nelly R.a,b,c; Heffron, Reneec,d; Donnell, Deborahg; Wald, Annad,e,f,h; Were, Edwin O.i; Rees, Helenj; Celum, Conniec,d,e; Kiarie, James N.a,b,c; Cohen, Craig R.k; Kayintekore, Kayitesil; Baeten, Jared M.c,d,efor the Partners in Prevention HSVHIV Transmission Study Team

doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32834a9338
EPIDEMIOLOGY AND SOCIAL
Free
SDC

Background: Physiologic and behavioral changes during pregnancy may alter HIV-1 susceptibility and infectiousness. Prospective studies exploring pregnancy and HIV-1 acquisition risk in women have found inconsistent results. No study has explored the effect of pregnancy on HIV-1 transmission risk from HIV-1-infected women to male partners.

Methods: In a prospective study of African HIV-1-serodiscordant couples, we evaluated the relationship between pregnancy and the risk of HIV-1 acquisition among women and HIV-1 transmission from women to men.

Results: Three thousand three hundred and twenty-one HIV-1-serodiscordant couples were enrolled, 1085 (32.7%) with HIV-1 susceptible female partners and 2236 (67.3%) with susceptible male partners. HIV-1 incidence in women was 7.35 versus 3.01 per 100 person-years during pregnant and nonpregnant periods [hazard ratio 2.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.33–4.09]. This effect was attenuated and not statistically significant after adjusting for sexual behavior and other confounding factors (adjusted hazard ratio 1.71, 95% CI 0.93–3.12). HIV-1 incidence in male partners of infected women was 3.46 versus 1.58 per 100 person-years when their partners were pregnant versus not pregnant (hazard ratio 2.31, 95% CI 1.22–4.39). This effect was not attenuated in adjusted analysis (adjusted hazard ratio 2.47, 95% CI 1.26–4.85).

Conclusion: HIV-1 risk increased two-fold during pregnancy. Elevated risk of HIV-1 acquisition in pregnant women appeared in part to be explained by behavioral and other factors. This is the first study to show that pregnancy increased the risk of female-to-male HIV-1 transmission, which may reflect biological changes of pregnancy that could increase HIV-1 infectiousness.

aDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Kenyatta National Hospital

bDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya

cDepartment of Global Health

dDepartment of Epidemiology

eDepartment of Medicine

fDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington

gStatistical Center for HIV/AIDS Research and Prevention

hVaccine and Infectious Disease Institute, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA

iDepartment of Reproductive Health, Moi University, Eldoret, Kenya

jReproductive Health and HIV Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

kDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA

lRwanda-Zambia HIV Research Group, Kigali, Rwanda.

Correspondence to Nelly R. Mugo, MBChB, MMed, MPH, University of Nairobi Institute of Tropical and Infectious Diseases (UNITID), Kenyatta National Hospital, Ngong Road, P.O. Box 19865-00202, Nairobi, Kenya. Tel: +254 20 2736744; e-mail: rwamba@u.washington.edu

Received 15 March, 2011

Revised 15 June, 2011

Accepted 5 July, 2011

The preliminary results were presented at the Microbicides 2010; 22–25 May 2010; Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA (abstract 8).

Back to Top | Article Outline

Introduction

In sub-Saharan Africa, women account for 60% of HIV-1-infected adults [1]. Many African countries with high HIV-1 prevalence also have high fertility rates, and women are pregnant for a substantial portion of their adult years. Physiologic changes during gestation – including high levels of progesterone that could induce systemic or genital mucosal immunologic changes [2,3] – may increase the risk for women to acquire HIV-1 during pregnancy and pregnant HIV-1-infected women to transmit to their sexual partners. Unprotected sex associated with efforts to conceive and continued during pregnancy may also increase HIV-1 risk.

High HIV-1 incidence during pregnancy has been reported among women from several populations [4–7], but prospective studies exploring pregnancy and HIV-1 acquisition risk in women have found inconsistent results: one documented a two-fold increased risk [8] and two found no increased risk [9,10]. Acute infection of women during pregnancy carries a high rate of HIV-1 transmission to infants [11]; thus, clear evidence of increased HIV-1 acquisition in women during pregnancy may promote policies for repeat HIV-1 testing in late pregnancy in high prevalence settings [12]. Among HIV-1-infected women, one study found increased HIV-1 shedding in genital secretions during pregnancy, suggesting increased infectiousness [13]; however, no prospective study has directly explored pregnancy as a risk factor for female-to-male HIV-1 transmission.

We evaluated the relationship between pregnancy and risk of HIV-1 acquisition in women and HIV-1 transmission from women to men in a prospective study of African HIV-1-serodiscordant couples.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Methods

Population and procedures

Between November 2004 and April 2007, 3408 HIV-1-serodiscordant couples from seven African countries (Botswana, Kenya, Rwanda, South Africa, Tanzania, Uganda, and Zambia) were enrolled in the Partners in Prevention HSV/HIV Transmission Study, a randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial of acyclovir herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) suppressive therapy for the prevention of HIV-1 transmission [14]. Acyclovir did not decrease HIV-1 risk within the couples [hazard ratio versus placebo 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60–1.41] [15]. This report is a secondary analysis of data from this prospective study.

Eligible couples were at least 18 years of age, reported at least three episodes of vaginal intercourse during the 3 months prior to screening, and intended to remain as a couple. HIV-1-infected partners were seropositive for HSV-2, had a CD4 cell count of at least 250 cells/μl, and were not taking antiretroviral therapy (ART). HIV-1-infected women who were pregnant at screening were excluded from the study and enrolled women who became pregnant during follow-up interrupted study medication use until the completion of pregnancy. Pregnant HIV-1-uninfected women were eligible for enrollment, as they did not receive study medication, and those who became pregnant during follow-up continued usual study procedures.

Participants were followed for up to 24 months, with all participants completing the study by October 2008. HIV-1-infected partners were seen monthly and HIV-1-uninfected partners quarterly. Data on sexual behavior – specifically, number of sexual acts with and without condoms within the partnership and with external partners – were collected at each visit on standardized case report forms using face-to-face interviews in local languages. Plasma for HIV-1 RNA quantification was collected at baseline and months 3, 6, 12, and study exit, and CD4 cell counts were performed every 6 months. HIV-1-infected persons who met national guidelines for initiation of ART, as a result of CD4 cell decline or clinical status, were referred to local HIV-1 care clinics. HIV-1-infected women who became pregnant were referred for prevention of mother-to-child transmission services. HIV-1-uninfected partners were seen quarterly for HIV-1 serologic testing. Contraceptive use was recorded at each study visit.

Participants received comprehensive HIV-1 prevention services including HIV-1 risk-reduction counseling (both individual and as a couple), quarterly syndromic sexually transmitted infection (STI) treatment, and provision of free condoms. The study protocol was approved by the University of Washington Human Subjects Review Committee and ethics review boards at each study site. Participants provided written informed consent.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Laboratory procedures

HIV-1 serologic testing was by rapid HIV-1 antibody tests, with positive results confirmed by HIV-1 western blot [15]. For initially HIV-1-uninfected partners who seroconverted to HIV-1, analysis of HIV-1 env and gag gene sequences from both members of the couple was used to determine whether transmission was genetically linked within the partnership [15,16]. Serologic testing for HSV-2 and nucleic acid amplification testing for STIs (Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis) was done at study enrollment [14]. CD4 cell quantification was performed using standard flow cytometry. Plasma HIV-1 RNA was quantified using the COBAS TaqMan real-time HIV-1 RNA assay, version 1.0 (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA).

Back to Top | Article Outline

Pregnancy procedures and definition of pregnancy exposure

Urine pregnancy tests were performed at screening and quarterly follow-up visits for HIV-1-infected women. For HIV-1-uninfected women, urine pregnancy tests were done on the basis of the report of missed menses. Date of last menstrual period (LMP), estimated date of delivery, and pregnancy outcome were collected for all pregnancies. We defined the start of pregnancy as the date of LMP and the end of pregnancy as the date of delivery or pregnancy loss. Complete data on LMP and date of delivery were available for 96% of pregnancies observed during the study; for the remaining 4% of pregnancies that were missing either of these parameters, we estimated start and end dates using the reported duration of the pregnancy (based on maternal history) and either LMP or date of delivery. We defined HIV-1-uninfected women and male partners of HIV-1-infected women as ‘pregnancy exposed’ during the period between LMP and 6 weeks following the end of pregnancy, thus including the early postpartum period as pregnancy-exposed time; inclusion of the early postpartum period is consistent with other studies of pregnancy as a risk factor for HIV-1 acquisition and reflects physiologic changes of pregnancy that persist in the early postpartum period [17–19].

Back to Top | Article Outline

Statistical analysis

Twenty-seven couples in which the HIV-1-infected partner's baseline serology did not confirm both HIV-1 and HSV-2 infection were excluded from the analysis, as were 60 couples in which the HIV-1-uninfected participant did not complete any follow-up visits for assessment of HIV-1 seroconversion.

Pregnancy was assessed as a time-varying exposure, with each participant's time divided into quarterly intervals corresponding to a period between study visits and each interval coded as pregnancy exposed or unexposed. We compared participant characteristics during pregnancy-exposed versus unexposed intervals using generalized estimating equations. We calculated pregnancy incidence by dividing the number of incident pregnancies by follow-up time when women were at risk to become pregnant.

The primary outcome was HIV-1 seroconversion. We analyzed the association between pregnancy and HIV-1 using Cox proportional hazards regression. For female-to-male HIV-1 transmission, we restricted HIV-1 seroconversions to those events that were genetically linked within the partnership, to reduce misclassification bias; men who acquired HIV-1 from a different partner contributed follow-up until HIV-1 seroconversion and were censored thereafter. For HIV-1 acquisition in women, our primary analysis did not restrict to linked transmissions, as the exposure (pregnancy) and outcome (HIV-1 seroconversion) were present in the same individuals (i.e., HIV-1 at-risk women); however, we performed a sensitivity analysis restricting to linked transmissions. We performed analyses classifying the pregnancy–exposure intervals as ‘early’ (defined as up until the first HIV-1 test occurring during a pregnancy, thus capturing HIV-1 transmission at or close to the time of conception) or ‘late’ (all HIV-1 tests occurring after the first test during pregnancy).

To assess potential confounding of the relationship between pregnancy and HIV-1 risk, we performed multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis controlling for demographic, clinical, and behavioral factors. Variables assessed for potential confounding included the following baseline variables: randomization arm of the HIV-1-infected partner (acyclovir versus placebo), age of the HIV-1-uninfected partner, region (east versus southern Africa), number of living children, STIs (in either partner), HSV-2 serostatus in the HIV-1-uninfected partner, and circumcision status of the male partner, as well as the following time-dependent variables: highly effective contraceptive use during past month (any oral, injectable, or implantable method, intrauterine device, or surgical sterilization), any unprotected sex with the study partner in the past month, any additional sex partners during the past month, total number of sex acts and unprotected sex acts during the past month, CD4 cell count of the HIV-1-infected partner, plasma HIV-1 RNA concentrations in the HIV-1-infected partner, and ART use by the HIV-1-infected partner during the past 3 months. Confounding factors that altered the hazard ratio of the effect of pregnancy on HIV-1 risk by at least 10% were included in the final multivariate model. Age of the HIV-1-uninfected partner, recent contraceptive use by the female partner, and any unprotected sex during the prior month were the only factors that confounded the relationship between pregnancy and HIV-1 and, thus, these were included in the final multivariate models.

We also analyzed our data using a case-crossover approach [20]. The case-crossover design minimizes unmeasured confounding by restricting the analysis to those who experience the study outcome (i.e., HIV-1 seroconversion). For this analysis, we included only those participants who acquired HIV-1, and we compared the probability of pregnancy exposure in follow-up intervals during which HIV-1 seroconversion occurred (the case period) to intervals before HIV-1 transmission occurred (control periods). Thus, each seroconverter in the case-crossover analysis served as their own control. Separate analyses were performed for male-to-female and female-to-male HIV-1 transmission. Conditional logistic regression was used, and adjusted models controlled for contraceptive use and unprotected sex as time-varying covariates.

Data were analyzed using SAS version 9.2 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USA).

Back to Top | Article Outline

Results

Population

A total of 3321 couples were included in this analysis: 1085 (32.7%) in which the man was infected with HIV-1 and 2236 (67.3%) in which the woman was HIV-1 infected (Table 1). Most couples were married and cohabitating. Among HIV-1-infected participants, the median CD4 cell count was 461 cells/μl and median plasma HIV-1 RNA concentration was 4.1 log10 copies/ml.

Table 1

Table 1

Back to Top | Article Outline

Follow-up and HIV-1 incidence

Median follow-up for HIV-1 seropositive and HIV-1 seronegative partners was 20.9 [interquartile range (IQR) 15.6–24.1] and 19.9 months (IQR 14.3–23.9), respectively. For HIV-1 seronegative partners, 5141 person-years of follow-up (1695 among HIV-1 seronegative women and 3446 among HIV-1 seronegative men) were accrued for assessment of HIV-1 seroincidence, during which 151 HIV-1 seroconversions occurred (61 in women and 90 in men). Among women, overall HIV-1 incidence was 3.60 cases per 100 person-years. Of the 90 incident HIV-1 infections in men, 58 (64.4%) were determined by viral sequencing to be genetically linked within the partnership for an incidence of linked transmission of 1.68 cases per 100 person-years.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Pregnancy during follow-up

At enrollment, 94 (8.7%) HIV-1-uninfected women and no HIV-1-infected women were pregnant, as pregnancy in HIV-1-infected women was a study exclusion criterion. An additional 226 pregnancies occurred among HIV-1-uninfected women after enrollment (incidence of 15.3 per 100 person-years, with1480 person-years of follow-up at risk for pregnancy), and 503 pregnancies (all detected after enrollment) occurred among HIV-1-infected women (incidence 16.0 per 100 person-years, with 3147 person-years of follow-up at risk for pregnancy). Twenty-seven HIV-1-uninfected and 27 HIV-infected women experienced two pregnancies; one HIV-1-infected woman was pregnant three times. Of the 320 total pregnancies in HIV-1-uninfected women, the median duration of pregnancy was 40 weeks (IQR 37–40), and 191 (59.7%) ended in live births, 32 (10.0%) in pregnancy losses, and 13 (4.1%) in unknown outcomes; 84 women (26.3%) were pregnant at study exit and pregnancy outcome information was not available. Of 503 pregnancies in HIV-1-infected women, the median duration of pregnancy was 38 weeks (IQR 21–40), and 216 (42.9%) ended in live births, 143 (28.4%) in pregnancy losses [119 of these 143 (83.2%) before 20 weeks’ gestation, in part reflecting ‘chemical pregnancies’ that were detected because of scheduled quarterly pregnancy testing in the study protocol), 14 (2.8%) in unknown outcomes, and 128 (25.5%) were ongoing at study exit. Overall, 13.6% of total person-years among HIV-1-uninfected women (988 of 7591 quarterly follow-up intervals) and 10.1% among HIV-1-uninfected men were defined as ‘pregnancy exposed.’ Couples who became pregnant were younger and more likely to report unprotected sex during pregnancy-exposed follow-up intervals (Table 2). Plasma HIV-1 concentrations and CD4 cell counts in HIV-1-infected partners were not significantly different during pregnant versus nonpregnant periods.

Table 2

Table 2

Back to Top | Article Outline

Effect of pregnancy on HIV-1 acquisition in women

Of the 61 HIV-1 seroconversions among women, 17 (27.9%) occurred during pregnancy (Table 3). The incidence of HIV-1 during pregnancy was 7.35 per 100 person-years compared with 3.01 per 100 person-years during nonpregnant intervals (hazard ratio 2.34, P = 0.003). HIV-1 risk was elevated during both early (hazard ratio 3.55, P = 0.007) and late pregnancy (hazard ratio 2.10, P = 0.02). In multivariate analysis, the effect of pregnancy on HIV-1 risk was attenuated and was no longer statistically significant (adjusted hazard ratio 1.71, P = 0.08). In a sensitivity analysis of the 49 HIV-1 seroconversions in women that were genetically linked to their male partner, the results were similar to those for all seroconversions in women: hazard ratio 2.44 (95% CI 1.31–4.53, P = 0.005) and adjusted hazard ratio 1.81 (95% CI 0.93–3.52, P = 0.08).

Table 3

Table 3

Back to Top | Article Outline

Effect of pregnancy on female-to-male HIV-1 transmission

Of the 58 HIV-1 transmissions to men, 12 (20.7%) occurred during pregnancy. The incidence of female-to-male HIV-1 transmission was 3.46 per 100 person-years during pregnancy compared with 1.58 per 100 person-years when the female partner was not pregnant. This effect was statistically significant (hazard ratio 2.31, P = 0.01) and remained statistically significant after adjustment for confounding factors (adjusted hazard ratio 2.47, P = 0.01). Subgroup analysis suggested increased HIV-1 transmission risk during both early (adjusted hazard ratio 2.64, P = 0.05) and late pregnancy (adjusted hazard ratio 2.37, P = 0.04), although there were small numbers of seroconversions in these subcategories (N = 5 and 7, respectively).

For the 216 pregnancies among HIV-1-infected women that ended in live births, 176 (81.5%) received antiretroviral medications, either short-course single or dual-agent therapy at the time of delivery (n = 102) or combination ART during the pregnancy (n = 74). For the 12 female-to-male HIV-1 transmissions that occurred during pregnancy, nine (75.0%) women received antiretrovirals during pregnancy, although only two when HIV-1 transmission occurred: one was in a couple for whom transmission coincided with the HIV-1-infected woman's use of short-course zidovudine during labor and the other, as previously reported [21], was in a couple in which the HIV-1-infected woman initiated combination ART early in the pregnancy and her partner seroconverted shortly thereafter. Further adjustment of the relationship between pregnancy and male-to-female HIV-1 transmission risk for antiretroviral use during pregnancy did not substantially change the risk estimate in Table 3 (adjusted hazard ratio 2.30, 95% CI 1.15–4.61, P = 0.02).

Back to Top | Article Outline

Case-crossover analysis

To further explore unmeasured confounding between women who experienced versus did not experience pregnancy, we performed case-crossover analyses, which were restricted to persons who acquired HIV-1 during follow-up. The association between pregnancy and HIV-1 acquisition in women was statistically significant in unadjusted [odds ratio (OR) 1.40, 95% CI 0.45–4.38, P = 0.56) and adjusted analysis (adjusted OR 1.33, 95% CI 0.42–4.25, P = 0.63). In contrast, the association between pregnancy and female-to-male HIV-1 transmission was statistically significant in both unadjusted analysis (OR 5.62, 95% CI 1.18–26.89, P = 0.03) and after adjusting for unprotected sex and contraceptive use (adjusted OR 13.63, 95% CI 1.60–116.22, P = 0.02). Thus, the case-crossover results were consistent with those obtained in multivariate Cox regression analysis.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Discussion

In this prospective study of more than 3300 African heterosexual HIV-1-serodiscordant couples, pregnancy was associated with increased incidence of HIV-1 acquisition in women and HIV-1 transmission from women to men. Elevated risk of HIV-1 acquisition in pregnant women appeared to be in part explained by behavioral and other factors, as the relationship between pregnancy and HIV-1 acquisition risk was not statistically significant after controlling for sexual behavior and other confounding variables. The finding that pregnancy increases the risk of female-to-male HIV-1 transmission two-fold is novel and has important public health implications for reducing HIV-1 transmission in high HIV-1 prevalence settings. These findings should stimulate new strategies to strengthen family planning and maternal health services for women with and at risk for HIV-1 in order to reduce unwanted pregnancies and avert HIV-1 transmission to pregnant women and from pregnant HIV-1-infected women to their infants and partners. In addition, our results strengthen the argument for initiation of combination ART in HIV-1-infected women during early pregnancy [12] to suppress maternal HIV-1 viral load and, thereby, reduce the risk of both perinatal and sexual transmission of HIV-1.

Increased HIV-1 risk during pregnancy could reflect a higher frequency of unprotected sexual activity among women who become pregnant versus those who do not become pregnant or could be caused by biologic changes in pregnancy and the postpartum period, such as immunologic changes affecting both the adaptive and innate immune systems [19,22], that may facilitate HIV-1 transmission. We found the risk for female-to-male transmission was statistically significant after adjustment for confounding factors and may, thus, primarily reflect biological changes of pregnancy that may increase HIV-1 infectiousness. High progesterone states, such as pregnancy, increase shedding of HIV-1 in female genital secretions and increase levels of HIV-1 coreceptors (e.g., CCR-5-expressing cells) in the genital mucosa, suggesting a possible mechanism for pregnancy to increase the infectiousness of women with HIV-1 [2,3,23]. One prior study found a 4.5-fold increased shedding of HIV-1-infected cells in genital secretions in pregnant compared with nonpregnant HIV-1-infected women [13].

In contrast to our female-to-male HIV-1 transmission results, we found the effect of pregnancy on HIV-1 acquisition risk in women was attenuated in multivariate analysis that controlled for age, contraceptive use, and unprotected sex and was no longer statistically significant, suggesting these factors in part accounted for increased HIV-1 risk for pregnant women. Both HIV-1 acquisition and pregnancy require unprotected sex, and elevated risk of HIV-1 acquisition during pregnancy may, thus, be largely due to behavioral risk differences of women who become pregnant versus not.

In our subset analysis, HIV-1 transmission risks were elevated during both early and late pregnancy, with slightly higher risk estimates during early pregnancy, perhaps reflecting unprotected sex leading to pregnancy and HIV-1 acquisition. Sociocultural pressure for a couple to conceive may outweigh the desire to prevent HIV-1 transmission within HIV-1-serodiscordant couples, and in the absence of techniques for conception that reduce HIV-1 transmission potential, couples may choose to risk unprotected sex [24]. We observed high incidences of pregnancy among both HIV-1-infected and uninfected women in this cohort.

Our study had several strengths. Our large sample size and multinational cohort make this the largest, most diverse sampling of HIV-1-serodiscordant couples reported. An important aspect of our study is that we determined genetic viral linkage of transmitted HIV-1 within partnerships, which minimized misclassification in our analysis of female-to-male HIV-1 transmission [15]. We performed additional analyses using a case-crossover approach, which controls for unmeasured confounders between persons, which yielded similar results to our proportional hazards analysis, lending further credibility to our findings. All HIV-1-infected participants in our study were coinfected with HSV-2, which is true of approximately 80% of HIV-1-infected persons in sub-Saharan Africa [25], and thus this is unlikely to limit the generality of our findings.

To reduce risk for HIV-1 acquisition and transmission during pregnancy, couples HIV-1 testing with targeted risk reduction for HIV-1-serodiscordant couples, promotion of condom use, and family planning to prevent unwanted pregnancy should be prioritized. For HIV-1-serodiscordant couples who desire fertility, preconception counseling, timed unprotected sex, combination ART use by the infected partner [21,26], and potentially antiretroviral preexposure prophylaxis may offer complementary options for meeting reproductive goals [27].

Recent studies have recognized high HIV-1 incidence in women during pregnancy and the early postpartum period [4–7]. However, in many antenatal clinics focused on prevention of mother-to-child HIV-1 transmission, little attention is paid to counseling of women found to be HIV-1 seronegative during routine antenatal testing. Our results render further support for wider implementation of repeat HIV-1 testing in pregnancy [12].

In many settings, ART for pregnant HIV-1-infected women is limited to short-course, mono-agent or dual-agent therapy given only during the peripartum period to reduce mother-to-child HIV-1 transmission; this approach results in residual HIV-1 risk for infants and likely has limited effects for reducing transmission to male partners during pregnancy. Early initiation of combination ART to maximally suppress HIV-1 levels for all HIV-1-infected pregnant women should be considered as a public health intervention to decrease HIV-1 transmission risk [12], not only to infants but also to sexual partners [26,28,29]. Male involvement in antenatal care settings is often very low [30], but male participation has been associated with increased uptake of perinatal prevention strategies and reduced infant HIV-1 transmission [31,32].

This study provides strong evidence that pregnancy is a high-risk period for HIV-1 transmission, both to women and from HIV-1-infected women to their male partners. Increased HIV-1 risk from pregnant HIV-1-infected women to male partners is novel and requires further studies to understand the possible biologic mechanisms that many explain this finding. Similarly, behavioral factors related to pregnancy appear important in increasing HIV-1 acquisition risk for women. Prenatal couples HIV-1 counseling and testing, implementation of repeat HIV-1 testing in pregnancy, and earlier initiation of combination ART should become part of routine antenatal care to protect mothers, infants, and male partners from HIV-1.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Acknowledgements

This study was supported through research grants from the US National Institutes of Health (R03 HD-068143, R01 AI-083034, and K24 AI-071113) and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (grant ID #26469).

The authors designed and executed the study, had full access to the raw data, performed all analyses, wrote the manuscript, and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication. The funder had no role in design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, or writing of the report.

Data management was provided by DF/Net Research Inc. (Seattle, USA) and site laboratory oversight was provided by Contract Lab Services (University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa).

The authors gratefully acknowledge the contributions of the HIV-1-serodiscordant couples who participated in this study and thank the teams at the study sites and at the University of Washington.

Members of the Partners in Prevention HSV/HIV Transmission Study Team:

University of Washington Coordinating Center and Central Laboratories, Seattle, USA: C.C. (principal investigator), A.W. (protocol co-chair), Jairam Lingappa (medical director), J.M.B., Mary S. Campbell, Robert W. Coombs, Lawrence Corey, James P. Hughes, Amalia Magaret, M. Juliana McElrath, Rhoda Morrow, and James I. Mullins.

Study sites and site principal investigators:

Cape Town, South Africa (University of Cape Town): David Coetzee; Eldoret, Kenya (Moi University, Indiana University): Kenneth Fife, E.O.W.; Gaborone, Botswana (Botswana Harvard Partnership): Max Essex, Joseph Makhema; Kampala, Uganda (Infectious Disease Institute, Makerere University): Elly Katabira, Allan Ronald; Kigali, Rwanda (Rwanda Zambia HIV Research Group, and Emory University): Susan Allen, K.K., Etienne Karita; Kisumu, Kenya (Kenya Medical Research Institute, University of California San Francisco): Elizabeth Bukusi, C.C.; Kitwe, Zambia (Rwanda Zambia HIV Research Group, Emory University): Susan Allen, William Kanweka; Lusaka, Zambia (Rwanda Zambia HIV Research Group, Emory University): Susan Allen, Bellington Vwalika; Moshi, Tanzania (Kilimanjaro Christian Medical College, Harvard University): Saidi Kapiga, Rachel Manongi; Nairobi, Kenya (University of Nairobi, University of Washington): Carey Farquhar, Grace John-Stewart, J.N.K.; Ndola, Zambia (Rwanda Zambia HIV Research Group, Emory University): Susan Allen, Mubiana Inambao; Orange Farm, South Africa (Reproductive Health Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand): Sinead Delany-Moretlwe, H.R.; Soweto, South Africa (Perinatal HIV Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand): Guy de Bruyn, Glenda Gray, James McIntyre; and Thika, Kenya (University of Nairobi, University of Washington): Nelly Rwamba Mugo.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Conflicts of interest

C.C. has received research grant support from GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), which did not include salary support, and has served on an advisory board for GSK. A.W. has received grant support from GSK and Antigenics and has been a consultant for Aicuris and Astellas.

Back to Top | Article Outline

References

2. Sheffield JS, Wendel GD Jr, McIntire DD, Norgard MV. The effect of progesterone levels and pregnancy on HIV-1 coreceptor expression. Reprod Sci 2009; 16:20–31.
3. Benki S, Mostad SB, Richardson BA, Mandaliya K, Kreiss JK, Overbaugh J. Cyclic shedding of HIV-1 RNA in cervical secretions during the menstrual cycle. J Infect Dis 2004; 189:2192–2201.
4. Taha TE, Dallabetta GA, Hoover DR, Chiphangwi JD, Mtimavalye LA, Liomba GN, et al. Trends of HIV-1 and sexually transmitted diseases among pregnant and postpartum women in urban Malawi. AIDS 1998; 12:197–203.
5. Leroy V, Van de Perre P, Lepage P, Saba J, Nsengumuremyi F, Simonon A, et al. Seroincidence of HIV-1 infection in African women of reproductive age: a prospective cohort study in Kigali, Rwanda, 1988–1992. AIDS 1994; 8:983–986.
6. Mbizvo MT, Kasule J, Mahomed K, Nathoo K. HIV-1 seroconversion incidence following pregnancy and delivery among women seronegative at recruitment in Harare, Zimbabwe. Cent Afr J Med 2001; 47:115–118.
7. Moodley D, Esterhuizen TM, Pather T, Chetty V, Ngaleka L. High HIV incidence during pregnancy: compelling reason for repeat HIV testing. AIDS 2009; 23:1255–1259.
8. Gray RH, Li X, Kigozi G, Serwadda D, Brahmbhatt H, Wabwire-Mangen F, et al. Increased risk of incident HIV during pregnancy in Rakai, Uganda: a prospective study. Lancet 2005; 366:1182–1188.
9. Morrison CS, Wang J, Van Der Pol B, Padian N, Salata RA, Richardson BA. Pregnancy and the risk of HIV-1 acquisition among women in Uganda and Zimbabwe. AIDS 2007; 21:1027–1034.
10. Reid SE, Dai JY, Wang J, Sichalwe BN, Akpomiemie G, Cowan FM, et al. Pregnancy, contraceptive use, and HIV acquisition in HPTN 039: relevance for HIV prevention trials among African women. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2010; 53:606–613.
11. Dunn DT, Newell ML, Ades AE, Peckham CS. Risk of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 transmission through breastfeeding. Lancet 1992; 340:585–588.
12. World Health Organization. Antiretroviral drugs for treating pregnant women and preventing HIV infections in infants: recommendations for a public health approach – 2010 version. Geneva: WHO Press; 2010. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/9789241599818_eng.pdf. [Accessed July 24 2011]
13. Clemetson DB, Moss GB, Willerford DM, Hensel M, Emonyi W, Holmes KK, et al. Detection of HIV DNA in cervical and vaginal secretions: prevalence and correlates among women in Nairobi, Kenya. JAMA 1993; 269:2860–2864.
14. Lingappa JR, Kahle E, Mugo N, Mujugira A, Magaret A, Baeten J, et al. Characteristics of HIV-1 discordant couples enrolled in a trial of HSV-2 suppression to reduce HIV-1 transmission: the Partners Study. PLoS One 2009; 4:e5272.
15. Celum C, Wald A, Lingappa JR, Magaret AS, Wang RS, Mugo N, et al. Acyclovir and transmission of HIV-1 from persons infected with HIV-1 and HSV-2. N Engl J Med 2010; 362:427–439.
16. Campbell MS, Mullins JI, Hughes JP, Celum C, Wong KG, Raugi DN, et al. Viral linkage in HIV-1 seroconverters and their partners in an HIV-1 prevention clinical trial. PLoS One 2011; 6:e16986.
17. Kinuthia J, Kiarie JN, Farquhar C, Richardson B, Nduati R, Mbori-Ngacha D, John-Stewart G. Cofactors for HIV-1 incidence during pregnancy and postpartum period. Curr HIV Res 2010; 8:510–514.
18. Moodley D, Esterhuizen T, Reddy L, Moodley P, Singh B, Ngaleka L, Govender D. Incident HIV infection in pregnant and lactating women and its effect on mother-to-child transmission in South Africa. J Infect Dis 2011; 203:1231–1234.
19. Elenkov IJ, Wilder RL, Bakalov VK, Link AA, Dimitrov MA, Fisher S, et al. IL-12, TNF-alpha, and hormonal changes during late pregnancy and early postpartum: implications for autoimmune disease activity during these times. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001; 86:4933–4938.
20. Maclure M. The case-crossover design: a method for studying transient effects on the risk of acute events. Am J Epidemiol 1991; 133:144–153.
21. Donnell D, Baeten JM, Kiarie J, Thomas KK, Stevens W, Cohen CR, et al. Heterosexual HIV-1 transmission after initiation of antiretroviral therapy: a prospective cohort analysis. Lancet 2010; 375:2092–2098.
22. Groer M, El-Badri N, Djeu J, Harrington M, Van Eepoel J. Suppression of natural killer cell cytotoxicity in postpartum women. Am J Reprod Immunol 2010; 63:209–213.
23. Reichelderfer PS, Coombs RW, Wright DJ, Cohn J, Burns DN, Cu-Uvin S, et al. Effect of menstrual cycle on HIV-1 levels in the peripheral blood and genital tract. WHS 001 Study Team. AIDS 2000; 14:2101–2107.
24. Beyeza-Kashesya J, Kaharuza F, Mirembe F, Neema S, Ekstrom AM, Kulane A. The dilemma of safe sex and having children: challenges facing HIV sero-discordant couples in Uganda. Afr Health Sci 2009; 9:2–12.
25. Strick LB, Wald A, Celum C. Management of herpes simplex virus type 2 infection in HIV type 1-infected persons. Clin Infect Dis 2006; 43:347–356.
26. Cohen MS, Chen YQ, McCauley M, Gamble T, Hosseinipour MC, Kumarasamy N, et al. for the HPTN 052 Study Team. Prevention of HIV-1 infection with early antiretroviral therapy.N Engl J Med 2011; E-published ahead of print 18 July 2011.
27. Matthews LT, Baeten JM, Celum C, Bangsberg DR. Periconception preexposure prophylaxis to prevent HIV transmission: benefits, risks, and challenges to implementation. AIDS 2010; 24:1975–1982.
28. Chasela CS, Hudgens MG, Jamieson DJ, Kayira D, Hosseinipour MC, Kourtis AP, et al. Maternal or infant antiretroviral drugs to reduce HIV-1 transmission. N Engl J Med 2010; 362:2271–2281.
29. Shapiro RL, Hughes MD, Ogwu A, Kitch D, Lockman S, Moffat C, et al. Antiretroviral regimens in pregnancy and breast-feeding in Botswana. N Engl J Med 2010; 362:2282–2294.
30. Byamugisha R, Tumwine JK, Semiyaga N, Tylleskar T. Determinants of male involvement in the prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV programme in Eastern Uganda: a cross-sectional survey. Reprod Health 2010; 7:12.
31. Aluisio A, Richardson BA, Bosire R, John-Stewart G, Mbori-Ngacha D, Farquhar C. Male antenatal attendance and HIV testing are associated with decreased infant HIV infection and increased HIV-free survival. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2011; 56:76–82.
32. Katz DA, Kiarie JN, John-Stewart GC, Richardson BA, John FN, Farquhar C. Male perspectives on incorporating men into antenatal HIV counseling and testing. PLoS One 2009; 4:e7602.
Keywords:

Africa; heterosexual; HIV-1 transmission; pregnancy; serodiscordant

© 2011 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.