Share this article on:

Impact of NRTIs on lipid levels among a large HIV-infected cohort initiating antiretroviral therapy in clinical care

Crane, Heidi Ma; Grunfeld, Carlb; Willig, James Hc; Mugavero, Michael Jc; Van Rompaey, Stephena; Moore, Richardd; Rodriguez, Benignoe; Feldman, Betsy Ja; Lederman, Michael Me; Saag, Michael Sc; Kitahata, Mari Ma

doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e328341f925
Clinical Science

Objective: To assess the associations between nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and change in lipid levels among a large cohort of HIV-infected patients in routine clinical care initiating their first potent antiretroviral regimen.

Design: Longitudinal observational cohort study from the Centers for AIDS Research Network of Integrated Clinical Systems (CNICS) cohort.

Methods: We used generalized estimating equations to examine the association between NRTIs and lipids accounting for within-patient correlations between repeated measures and key clinical and demographic characteristics including other antiretroviral medications.

Results: Among 2267 individuals who started their first antiretroviral regimen, tenofovir with emtricitabine or lamivudine was associated with lower levels for total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), triglycerides, non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and HDL, compared with other NRTI pairs in adjusted analyses. LDL levels were highest among patients receiving didanosine/lamivudine. Triglyceride levels were highest in stavudine/lamivudine users. HDL levels were highest among patients receiving didanosine/stavudine. Hepatitis C infection and younger age were also associated with lower lipid levels.

Conclusion: We found clinically important heterogeneity within the NRTI class of antiretroviral medications regarding their effect on lipid levels over time. Although the lipid profile of tenofovir with emtricitabine or lamivudine appeared to be less pro-atherogenic in this large longitudinal study of HIV-infected patients in routine clinical care, there was no association with beneficial HDL levels. In general, the change in lipid levels associated with most antiretroviral agents, particularly those NRTI combinations currently in common use, are relatively modest. Additional studies are needed to understand the long-term implications of these findings on cardiovascular disease risk.

aUniversity of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA

bUniversity of California, San Francisco, California, USA

cUniversity of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama, USA

dJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

eCase Western Reserve University, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Received 26 August, 2010

Revised 25 October, 2010

Accepted 26 October, 2010

Correspondence to Heidi M. Crane, MD, M.P.H., Center for AIDS and STD Research, University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center, Box 359931, 325 9th Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104, USA. Tel: +1 206 744 6649; fax: +1 206 744 3693; e-mail:

Back to Top | Article Outline


Dyslipidemia is an important risk factor for development of cardiovascular disease, the leading cause of death and morbidity in the general population in the US [1] and an important cause of death among HIV-infected individuals [2]. Abnormal lipid levels were evident among HIV-infected patients prior to the introduction of antiretroviral therapy (ART) [3,4]. After ART initiation, increases in total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL), and triglyceride levels were noted among HIV-infected patients [5–8], possibly attributed in part to a return to preinfection levels [5].

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have examined the effect of a limited number of antiretroviral medications or regimens on lipids [9–20]; however, it is not feasible that any RCT will examine the effects of all antiretroviral medications in the context of combination therapy. Observational cohort studies can complement information from RCTs, yet many prior studies often included small samples [6,7,21–30], and were cross-sectional or had limited follow-up [22,23,25–28,31–34]. Furthermore, cohort studies often examined only class effects, and/or did not examine the contribution of each medication in a regimen, in particular not examining nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) [21–25,27,30,33–38].

We conducted this longitudinal study of a large cohort of HIV-infected patients in routine care initiating their first potent ART regimen to examine the associations between NRTI pairs and changes in lipid levels controlling for entire ART regimens.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Study setting

The observational cohort study was conducted among patients from the Centers for AIDS Research Network of Integrated Clinical Systems (CNICS) cohort. CNICS is a longitudinal observational study of HIV-infected patients at eight clinical sites receiving primary care after 1 January 1995 to the present [39]. The CNICS cohort is a large and diverse population of HIV-infected patients [39]. Patients from four sites [University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), University of Washington, Johns Hopkins University (JHU), and Case Western Reserve University (CWRU)] were included in these analyses.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Study participants

All HIV-infected patients 18 years of age or older who were protease inhibitor and nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-naive when they enrolled in primary continuity HIV care at a participating site and initiated potent combination ART before 2 January 2008 were eligible for inclusion. Patients were required to have more than 2 months of follow-up after initiating ART, which was defined as regimens containing at least three drugs including either a protease inhibitor or NNRTI, and to have at least one set of serum lipid levels while receiving their initial potent regimen. Patients who started regimens with three or more NRTIs without a protease inhibitor or NNRTI, or whose regimen contained amprenavir, or included saquinavir or ritonavir as a single protease inhibitor were excluded due to small numbers. Patients were eligible if they had prior single or dual NRTI exposure; however, they must not have been receiving NRTIs in the 3 months prior to initiating their first potent regimen. Patients were followed until discontinuation or change in their initial potent regimen, loss to follow-up, or 4 January 2008, whichever occurred first. The study received Institutional Review Board approval.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Data sources

The CNICS data repository captures longitudinal data on the CNICS cohort and was the data source for this study. The data repository integrates comprehensive clinical data from all outpatient and inpatient encounters including standardized HIV-related information collected at enrollment (initial clinic visit) regarding a patient's prior ART history. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and medication data are obtained from each site's electronic health record and other institutional data sources. Medication data are entered into the electronic health records by clinicians or prescription fill/refill data are uploaded directly from Pharmacy Systems and verified through medical record review.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Measurement of lipid levels

We examined serum lipid levels over time including TC, LDL, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL), triglycerides, and non-HDL values (calculated by subtracting HDL from TC values) [40]. Lipid values were measured as part of routine care, except LDL, which is either measured or calculated using the Friedewald equation [41].

Back to Top | Article Outline

Statistical analysis

We examined the association between lipid levels and antiretroviral medications categorized into mutually exclusive groups. A NRTI variable categorized patients by their pair of NRTIs. Patients receiving emtricitabine were grouped with patients taking lamivudine. Patients whose regimen contained more than two NRTIs were categorized by the pair of NRTIs other than lamivudine. A separate protease inhibitor/NNRTI variable categorized patients by their individual protease inhibitors and NNRTIs. Patients receiving boosted protease inhibitor regimens were grouped by their nonritonavir protease inhibitor. We also created a separate variable for boosting doses of ritonavir (≤400 mg/day). Nonpotent ART regimens (single or dual NRTIs in the prepotent ART era) were captured by a separate variable from potent ART regimens.

We also evaluated demographic characteristics (age, HIV transmission risk factor, race, sex, and site) and clinical characteristics [CD4+ cell count nadir, baseline HIV-1 RNA level, hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection indicated by either presence of HCV antibody or HCV RNA; hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection indicated by presence of HBVe or surface antigen or HBV DNA, diabetes mellitus, smoking status, history of opportunistic infection at ART initiation, and body mass index (BMI)]. We examined secular trends in care using calendar period of ART initiation by year and as a binary variable (1999 and before vs. 2000 and after). For the small subset of individuals for whom baseline height was missing, we used an imputed height based on age, race, and sex. We calculated BMI using the traditional Quetelet index: weight divided by height squared (kg/m2) [42].

We used generalized estimating equations with an exchangeable correlation structure and robust standard errors to assess differences in lipid levels associated with antiretroviral medications accounting for within-patient correlations between repeated measures and confounding covariates [43]. Separate models were conducted for each outcome: TC, LDL, HDL, triglyceride, and non-HDL values. Final models were adjusted for age, race, sex, NRTI pairs, protease inhibitors/NNRTIs, boosted ritonavir, prior nonpotent ART (NRTI) exposure, HCV status, HBV status, CD4+ cell count nadir, smoking status, diabetes mellitus, history of opportunistic infection, time on ART, calendar period, and site. We conducted sensitivity analyses using natural log-transformed triglyceride values to address a skewed distribution.

We expected that patients would have lipid level changes associated with improvement in health status following ART initiation and these changes would be consistent across regimens. Nevertheless, we conducted sensitivity analyses that also incorporated change in CD4+ cell count and BMI in the initial 6 months of ART to evaluate if differences in lipid values associated with antiretroviral medications could be due to differential improvement in health status following ART initiation.

Additional sensitivity analyses adjusted for lipid-lowering medication data were available from three sites (University of Washington, UAB, and CWRU). We categorized lipid-lowering medications into two categories: 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (‘statins’) and other lipid-lowering medication (niacin, fibrates, fish oil, ezetimibe).

Back to Top | Article Outline


There were 2267 patients who met study criteria and had lipid values measured while on their initial ART regimen with 10 641 TC values, 1341 patients with 4538 HDL values, 1332 patients with 4352 LDL values, 1872 patients with 8754 triglyceride values, and 1340 patients with 4530 non-HDL values. Mean age at ART initiation was 38 years (SD 9), 75% were men, mean CD4+ cell count was 173 cells/μl, and 54% had a peak viral load greater than 100 000 copies/ml (Table 1).

Table 1

Table 1

Antiretroviral therapy regimens were evenly divided between patients receiving protease inhibitor (N = 1082, 48%) and NNRTI-based regimens (N = 1185, 52%) (Tables 2 and 3). Patients were on their initial regimen for a mean of 1.7 years (SD 1.7). There were 1706 patients (75%) on their ART regimen for more than 6 months, and 1223 (54%) for more than 12 months. Statin and other lipid-lowering medication use increased with ART duration; approximately half as many patients were receiving statins (N = 49) or other lipid-lowering medication (N = 21) after 1 year of ART vs. the number of patients on statins (N = 98) or other lipid-lowering medication (N = 45) after 3 years of ART (or end of the initial regimen, whichever came first).

Table 2

Table 2

Table 3

Table 3

Back to Top | Article Outline

Adjusted analyses

Women had higher mean TC, LDL, and HDL values, and lower triglyceride values compared with men in adjusted analyses (Table 4). African-American individuals had higher mean TC, LDL, triglyceride, and non-HDL values, and lower HDL values compared with white individuals. Older age was associated with higher TC, LDL, HDL, triglyceride, and non-HDL values. HCV was associated with lower TC, LDL, triglyceride, and non-HDL values (Table 4). CD4+ nadir was associated with higher TC levels. There were no significant associations between patients with HBV, prior nonpotent ART (NRTIs), or opportunistic infections and lipid levels.

Table 4

Table 4

Mean lipid levels were higher at all follow-up time periods compared with baseline. In general, lipid levels increased most rapidly during the first 2 months and then either reached a plateau or continued to increase much more slowly (Table 5).

Table 5

Table 5

Patients receiving tenofovir/lamivudine (or tenofovir/emtricitabine) had lower lipid levels than other NRTI pairs. Specifically, TC levels were significantly higher among patients who received any other NRTI pair compared with tenofovir/lamivudine (+10–22 mg/dl, P values <0.001–0.002) (Table 6). Mean triglyceride values were higher among patients receiving any other NRTI pair compared with tenofovir/lamivudine in adjusted analyses; however, most of these increases did not reach statistical significance. Compared with patients on tenofovir/lamivudine, receiving stavudine/lamivudine, didanosine/lamivudine or zidovudine/lamivudine was associated with higher non-HDL levels. A similar effect cannot be ruled out for other NRTI pairs although they did not reach statistical significance. In comparison to tenofovir/lamivudine, patients receiving any other NRTI pair had higher HDL levels in adjusted analyses (+3–11 mg/dl, P values <0.001–0.02) (Table 6).

Table 6

Table 6

Regimens containing didanosine/lamivudine had the greatest impact on LDL levels (+12 mg/dl, P = 0.03). Didanosine/stavudine was associated with similarly higher LDL levels as didanosine/lamivudine (+14 mg/dl), although this did not reach statistical significance in the main model, it was significant in sensitivity analyses (see below).

Triglyceride analyses were repeated using natural log-transformed values in order to address the skewed distribution. In addition to the findings in the main model (Table 6), elevated triglyceride values were also associated with zidovudine/lamivudine (P = 0.01) compared with tenofovir/lamivudine.

We conducted sensitivity analyses that included change in CD4+ cell count as a measure of health status improvement. There were 1533 patients (68%) with change in CD4+ cell count available at 6 months (±3 months) on ART. Change in CD4 cell count was associated with higher TC, LDL, and non-HDL levels (0.2 mg/dl per 10 cells/μl, P values = 0.008–0.05) but not HDL or triglyceride levels. Associations between antiretroviral medications and change in lipid levels were essentially unchanged in models that also adjusted for change in CD4+ cell count over 6 months compared with the main models.

In addition, we conducted sensitivity analyses that included change in BMI among 823 patients with change in BMI available at 6 months (±3 months). Change in BMI was associated with higher TC (1.9 mg/dl per kg/m2, P = 0.02), LDL (1.5 mg/dl per kg/m2, P = 0.006), triglycerides (5.7 mg/dl per kg/m2, P = 0.03), and non-HDL values (2.1 mg/dl per kg/m2, P = 0.009) but not HDL levels. Associations between antiretroviral medications and change in lipid levels were virtually unchanged in models that also adjusted for change in BMI over 6 months compared with the main models except didanosine/stavudine use was also associated with increased LDL (+14 mg/dl, 95% CI 1–28, P = 0.04), triglyceride (+128 mg/dl, 95% CI 13–244, P = 0.03), and non-HDL values (+29 mg/dl, 95% CI 10–49, P = 0.003).

We examined the impact of statins and other lipid-lowering medications on our findings in sensitivity analyses among patients from three sites with information regarding these medications. Findings were similar to the main models after also adjusting for statins and other lipid-lowering medications.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Findings from this large longitudinal study of HIV-infected patients in routine care demonstrated that patients whose initial regimen contained tenofovir/lamivudine (or tenofovir/emtricitabine) had the smallest increase in lipid levels for all lipid outcomes including not only pro-atherogenic lipids, but also HDL in adjusted analyses. Didanosine/lamivudine was associated with greater increases in LDL values. This study demonstrated the importance of comparing antiretroviral medications within classes and not just focusing on class effects. This study also demonstrated that HCV infection and younger age are associated with lower lipid levels among HIV-infected individuals following the initiation of ART.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors

We found smaller increases in lipids among patients who received tenofovir/lamivudine vs. other NRTI pairs in adjusted analyses. Prior studies on the association of NRTIs and lipids have had conflicting results. Whereas several studies have suggested there are differences associated with particular NRTIs [11,44–52], a few have not [9,28,53]. Switch studies have demonstrated decreases in lipid levels among those who changed other NRTIs to tenofovir [46–51,54,55]; however, these differences have sometimes waned over time [56], and did not necessarily include HDL [46,51,56,57]. In addition, switch studies are often small, and examine only one particular comparison. A meta-analysis of 48-week data from clinical trial patients found smaller increases in TC, LDL, and triglyceride levels among patients on tenofovir/emtricitabine than other NRTIs (stavudine, zidovudine, and abacavir with lamivudine); however, the other NRTIs were combined in one group and not compared separately [12]. A large cross-sectional study suggested tenofovir was associated with lower triglyceride levels compared with those not receiving tenofovir [32]. Our findings differed from the Swiss cohort study results that found that increasing exposure to abacavir may be associated with a decline in triglyceride levels [58]. However, that study combined tenofovir with abacavir for analysis making interpretation of the impact of either drug difficult.

We found smaller increases in HDL levels among those who initiated tenofovir/lamivudine than those who started other NRTI pairs. This stands in contrast to a prior clinical trial that did not detect differences in HDL levels at 144 weeks among those on tenofovir/lamivudine vs. zidovudine/lamivudine [44]. This difference in findings may be due to the small absolute difference in HDL levels. Our findings also differ from those of another RCT conducted among treatment-naive patients starting efavirenz, lamivudine, and either tenofovir or stavudine which found smaller increases in TC, LDL, and triglyceride values among patients on tenofovir, but larger increases in HDL [59]. A prior large cross-sectional study among HIV-infected women found that use of didanosine or lamivudine was associated with higher HDL levels; however, that study was not limited to individuals on their initial ART regimen [32]. A simplification trial of patients changed to abacavir/lamivudine vs. tenofovir/emtricabine suggested that patients who received tenofovir/emtricitabine had lower lipid levels including HDL; however, they also were more ART-experienced and slightly more likely to be receiving lipid-lowering medication thereby complicating interpretation [60]. An RCT of patients on zidovudine or stavudine switched to abacavir or tenofovir found significantly greater decreases in mean TC, LDL, and triglycerides for patients switched to tenofovir than among those switched to abacavir, but differences in HDL levels were not significantly different [47]. Few large longitudinal studies have evaluated differences in HDL levels associated with particular NRTIs or NRTI pairs among naive patients in routine care, which is addressed by the current study thereby providing complementary data to clinical trial results.

Didanosine/lamivudine use was associated with the greatest increase in LDL levels and didanosine/stavudine was associated with greater increases in lipid levels in sensitivity analyses that also accounted for BMI. Accounting for BMI may be particularly important in evaluating the association between lipids and NRTIs such as didanosine/stavudine, which have been shown to have a very different impact on body fat changes than other NRTIs such as abacavir/lamivudine [61]. Whether the increased LDL associated with didanosine/lamivudine contributes to the suggested association between recent didanosine and risk of myocardial infarction [62] has yet to be established.

Back to Top | Article Outline


We found the greatest lipid level increases in the first 2 months after starting ART and that individual lipid levels continued to increase for different time periods. Our findings expand on prior studies that found the largest increases in lipid levels during the first 6 months of ART but did not examine the time early after ART initiation [7] or look beyond 12 months [30,63,64]. Our findings differs from a Ugandan study of patients on NNRTI-based regimens which found TC and HDL levels increased during the first year and then plateaued, LDL increased over 2 years, and triglyceride levels dropped and then returned to baseline at 24 months [53]. We did not note an initial decline in triglyceride levels. These differences in triglyceride level results may be due to differences in health status among patients initiating ART in Uganda vs. the US.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Hepatitis C virus

Several prior studies have suggested an association between HCV and low TC [22,65–73] and LDL levels [22,67,69] among HIV-infected individuals. Conflicting results have been reported regarding a possible association between HCV and lower triglyceride levels among HIV-infected patients with some studies suggesting an association [65,69,74,75] and others not [22,66,67,73,76]. We found that HCV is associated with lower TC, LDL, non-HDL and triglyceride levels in adjusted analyses. Notably, despite having more favorable pro-atherogenic lipid profiles, HCV co-infected patients recently were shown to have higher rates of cardiovascular events among a study of US veterans [77].

Back to Top | Article Outline

Health status

Improved immune status and restoration to good health may play a role in the changes in lipid levels seen with ART [8,22]. Part of the increase in lipid levels, particularly LDL, is likely a return to prebaseline levels with ART initiation and improvement in immune status [5,22,78]. It seems unlikely, however, that this would result in a differential impact on lipid levels by antiretroviral medications. We conducted sensitivity analyses that included changes in CD4+ cell count or BMI over 6 months to see if differential improvement in health status or weight could be affecting results. Increases in CD4+ cell count were associated with small increases in TC, LDL, and non-HDL values, whereas increases in BMI were associated with large increases in TC, LDL, triglyceride, and non-HDL values. Although more limited due to smaller sample size, these sensitivity analyses demonstrated that changes in CD4+ or BMI did not explain all of the differences in the impact of individual antiretroviral medications on lipid levels.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Lipid-lowering medication

We found that use of lipid-lowering medications increased over time, as has been seen previously [79]. This could confound the associations between lipid levels and antiretroviral medications; however, sensitivity analyses that included adjustment for statins and other lipid-lowering medication revealed similar findings as in the main model. The overall consistency of the various analyses provides additional reassurance of the robustness of the findings.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Lipid values were measured in routine care so we could not confirm fasting status and there are different numbers of values for each lipid class. Patients were not randomized to their antiretroviral medications. As with any observational study, there may be confounding factors for which adjustment is not possible. Too few naive patients initiated ART with medications used less commonly in first regimens such as amprenavir, maraviroc, tipranavir, or darunavir to include patients on these regimens in the analyses; however, data continue to accrue. Due to small numbers, lipid-lowering medications were categorized into two classes, rather than examined individually. Finally, the study lacks information regarding genetic factors, diet, and exercise; however, we would not expect these factors to vary by particular regimen.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Strengths of this study include comprehensive clinical data and large patient numbers. Comprehensive data allowed us to censor lipid values after changes had been made to antiretroviral regimens. It has been suggested that excluding those on lipid-lowering medication would result in a biased estimate of lipid levels because these medications are most likely to be used in those with the highest serum lipid levels [8]. However, the comprehensive data allowed us to examine the impact of lipid-lowering medications rather than simply excluding those patients. Studies have provided information on individual protease inhibitor and NNRTI agents; however, many fewer studies have examined the impact of NRTI backbones. The large sample size facilitated inclusion of over 500 women allowing us to expand on prior studies, which focused only on men [5,7,8].

Additional strengths of this study are the longitudinal study design and inclusion of only patients naive to potent ART. This is not the first study to examine the association between medications and lipid levels; however, many of the prior studies were cross-sectional in nature [31,32], and did not limit patients to their initial regimen increasing concerns about confounding in comparisons between patients by antiretroviral medications. Although inclusion of only potent ART-naive patients may limit generalizability to all HIV-infected patients, it eliminates the potential confounding due to duration or number of prior regimens [31]. An additional strength is the inclusion of non-HDL which was not examined in many early studies and has been shown to be an important consideration in cardiovascular risk assessment, particularly in the setting of elevated triglycerides, a common problem in HIV-infected individuals.

Back to Top | Article Outline


The longitudinal study examined the association between different antiretroviral medications and lipids among a large cohort of ART-naive HIV-infected patients in routine care. Patients who initiated regimens containing tenofovir/lamivudine (or tenofovir/emtricitabine) had the smallest increases in lipid levels, including HDL. The long-term implications of these findings on cardiovascular disease risk are not yet known. Findings from this study demonstrate that comparisons of dyslipidemia and cardiovascular disease risk factors associated with antiretroviral medications should focus on individual agents rather than on class effects. This study provides additional evidence that the metabolic impact of most antiretroviral agents, particularly those used more commonly in initial regimens in the current ART era, are relatively modest.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Funding/support: This work was supported by grants from the Mentored Patient-Oriented Research Career Development Award NIAID Grant (AI-60464), the American Heart Association Grant-in-Aid Grant (09050129G), the AHRQ grant (R21HS019516), the CNICS grant (R24 AI067039), and the University of Washington Center for AIDS Research NIAID Grant (AI-27757). The funding agreements ensured the authors' independence in designing the study, interpreting the data, writing, and publishing the report.

H.M.C., M.M.K., and C.G. contributed to study design; M.M.K., M.S.S., R.M., M.M.L. contributed to data collection; H.M.C., S.V.R., B.J.F., and M.M.K. contributed to data quality and analyses; all authors contributed to manuscript development and have reviewed the manuscript.

This work was presented in part at 12th International Workshop on HIV Observational Databases, in Malaga, Spain.

Back to Top | Article Outline


1. Anderson RN, Smith BL. Deaths: leading causes for 2002. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2005; 53:1–89.
2. Aberg JA. Cardiovascular complications in HIV management: past, present and future. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2009; 50:54–64.
3. Grunfeld C, Pang M, Doerrler W, Shigenaga JK, Jensen P, Feingold KR. Lipids, lipoproteins, triglyceride clearance, and cytokines in human immunodeficiency virus infection and the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1992; 74:1045–1052.
4. Shor-Posner G, Basit A, Lu Y, Cabrejos C, Chang J, Fletcher M, et al. Hypocholesterolemia is associated with immune dysfunction in early human immunodeficiency virus-1 infection. Am J Med 1993; 94:515–519.
5. Riddler SA, Smit E, Cole SR, Li R, Chmiel JS, Dobs A, et al. Impact of HIV infection and HAART on serum lipids in men. J Am Med Assoc 2003; 289:2978–2982.
6. Tsiodras S, Mantzoros C, Hammer S, Samore M. Effects of protease inhibitors on hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia, and lipodystrophy: a 5-year cohort study. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160:2050–2056.
7. Riddler SA, Li X, Chu H, Kingsley LA, Dobs A, Evans R, et al. Longitudinal changes in serum lipids among HIV-infected men on highly active antiretroviral therapy. HIV Med 2007; 8:280–287.
8. Riddler SA, Li X, Otvos J, Post W, Palella F, Kingsley L, et al. Antiretroviral therapy is associated with an atherogenic lipoprotein phenotype among HIV-1-infected men in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2008; 48:281–288.
9. Joly V, Flandre P, Meiffredy V, Leturque N, Harel M, Aboulker JP, Yeni P. Increased risk of lipoatrophy under stavudine in HIV-1-infected patients: results of a substudy from a comparative trial. AIDS 2002; 16:2447–2454.
10. Fisac C, Virgili N, Ferrer E, Barbera MJ, Fumero E, Vilarasau C, Podzamczer D. A comparison of the effects of nevirapine and nelfinavir on metabolism and body habitus in antiretroviral-naive human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients: a randomized controlled study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003; 88:5186–5192.
11. Dube MP, Parker RA, Tebas P, Grinspoon SK, Zackin RA, Robbins GK, et al. Glucose metabolism, lipid, and body fat changes in antiretroviral-naive subjects randomized to nelfinavir or efavirenz plus dual nucleosides. AIDS 2005; 19:1807–1818.
12. Hill A, Sawyer W, Gazzard B. Effects of first-line use of nucleoside analogues, efavirenz, and ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors on lipid levels. HIV Clin Trials 2009; 10:1–12.
13. Cahn PE, Gatell JM, Squires K, Percival LD, Piliero PJ, Sanne IA, et al. Atazanavir: a once-daily HIV protease inhibitor that does not cause dyslipidemia in newly treated patients: results from two randomized clinical trials. J Int Assoc Physicians AIDS Care (Chic Ill) 2004; 3:92–98.
14. Shlay JC, Bartsch G, Peng G, Wang J, Grunfeld C, Gibert CL, et al. Long-term body composition and metabolic changes in antiretroviral naive persons randomized to protease inhibitor-, nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-, or protease inhibitor plus nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based strategy. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2007; 44:506–517.
15. Podzamczer D, Ferrer E, Sanchez P, Gatell JM, Crespo M, Fisac C, et al. Less lipoatrophy and better lipid profile with abacavir as compared to stavudine: 96-week results of a randomized study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2007; 44:139–147.
16. Moyle G, Higgs C, Teague A, Mandalia S, Nelson M, Johnson M, et al. An open-label, randomized comparative pilot study of a single-class quadruple therapy regimen versus a 2-class triple therapy regimen for individuals initiating antiretroviral therapy. Antivir Ther 2006; 11:73–78.
17. Kumar PN, Rodriguez-French A, Thompson MA, Tashima KT, Averitt D, Wannamaker PG, et al. A prospective, 96-week study of the impact of Trizivir, Combivir/nelfinavir, and lamivudine/stavudine/nelfinavir on lipids, metabolic parameters and efficacy in antiretroviral-naive patients: effect of sex and ethnicity. HIV Med 2006; 7:85–98.
18. Jemsek JG, Arathoon E, Arlotti M, Perez C, Sosa N, Pokrovskiy V, et al. Body fat and other metabolic effects of atazanavir and efavirenz, each administered in combination with zidovudine plus lamivudine, in antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected patients. Clin Infect Dis 2006; 42:273–280.
19. Tashima KT, Bausserman L, Alt EN, Aznar E, Flanigan TP. Lipid changes in patients initiating efavirenz- and indinavir-based antiretroviral regimens. HIV Clin Trials 2003; 4:29–36.
20. Molina JM, Andrade-Villanueva J, Echevarria J, Chetchotisakd P, Corral J, David N, et al. Once-daily atazanavir/ritonavir compared with twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir, each in combination with tenofovir and emtricitabine, for management of antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected patients: 96-week efficacy and safety results of the CASTLE study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2010; 53:323–332.
21. Smith JH, Martin GJ, Decker CF. Hyperlipidemia associated with the use of protease inhibitors. Clin Infect Dis 2000; 31:207–208.
22. Floris-Moore M, Howard AA, Lo Y, Arnsten JH, Santoro N, Schoenbaum EE. Increased serum lipids are associated with higher CD4 lymphocyte count in HIV-infected women. HIV Med 2006; 7:421–430.
23. Rose H, Woolley I, Hoy J, Dart A, Bryant B, Mijch A, Sviridov D. HIV infection and high-density lipoprotein: the effect of the disease vs. the effect of treatment. Metabolism 2006; 55:90–95.
24. Manfredi R, Chiodo F. Disorders of lipid metabolism in patients with HIV disease treated with antiretroviral agents: frequency, relationship with administered drugs, and role of hypolipidaemic therapy with bezafibrate. J Infect 2001; 42:181–188.
25. Bernal E, Masia M, Padilla S, Gutierrez F. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol in HIV-infected patients: evidence for an association with HIV-1 viral load, antiretroviral therapy status, and regimen composition. AIDS Patient Care STDS 2008; 22:569–575.
26. Bergersen BM, Tonstad S, Sandvik L, Bruun JN. Low prevalence of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level < 1 mmol/L in nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor recipients. Int J STD AIDS 2005; 16:365–369.
27. Calza L, Manfredi R, Farneti B, Chiodo F. Incidence of hyperlipidaemia in a cohort of 212 HIV-infected patients receiving a protease inhibitor-based antiretroviral therapy. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2003; 22:54–59.
28. Matthews GV, Moyle GJ, Mandalia S, Bower M, Nelson M, Gazzard BG. Absence of association between individual thymidine analogues or nonnucleoside analogues and lipid abnormalities in HIV-1-infected persons on initial therapy. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2000; 24:310–315.
29. Leitner JM, Pernerstorfer-Schoen H, Weiss A, Schindler K, Rieger A, Jilma B. Age and sex modulate metabolic and cardiovascular risk markers of patients after 1 year of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Atherosclerosis 2006; 187:177–185.
30. Segerer S, Bogner JR, Walli R, Loch O, Goebel FD. Hyperlipidemia under treatment with proteinase inhibitors. Infection 1999; 27:77–81.
31. Fontas E, van Leth F, Sabin CA, Friis-Moller N, Rickenbach M, d'Arminio Monforte A, et al. Lipid profiles in HIV-infected patients receiving combination antiretroviral therapy: are different antiretroviral drugs associated with different lipid profiles? J Infect Dis 2004; 189:1056–1074.
32. Anastos K, Lu D, Shi Q, Tien PC, Kaplan RC, Hessol NA, et al. Association of serum lipid levels with HIV serostatus, specific antiretroviral agents, and treatment regimens. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2007; 45:34–42.
33. Chang ES, Tetreault DD, Liu YT, Beall GN. The effects of antiretroviral protease inhibitors on serum lipid levels in HIV-infected patients. J Am Diet Assoc 2001; 101:687–689.
34. Friis-Moller N, Weber R, Reiss P, Thiebaut R, Kirk O, d'Arminio Monforte A, et al. Cardiovascular disease risk factors in HIV patients–association with antiretroviral therapy. Results from the DAD study. AIDS 2003; 17:1179–1193.
35. Periard D, Telenti A, Sudre P, Cheseaux JJ, Halfon P, Reymond MJ, et al. Atherogenic dyslipidemia in HIV-infected individuals treated with protease inhibitors. The Swiss HIV Cohort Study. Circulation 1999; 100:700–705.
36. Levy AR, McCandless L, Harrigan PR, Hogg RS, Bondy G, Iloeje UH, et al. Changes in lipids over twelve months after initiating protease inhibitor therapy among persons treated for HIV/AIDS. Lipids Health Dis 2005; 4:4.
37. Thiebaut R, Dequae-Merchadou L, Ekouevi DK, Mercie P, Malvy D, Neau D, Dabis F. Incidence and risk factors of severe hypertriglyceridaemia in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy: the Aquitaine Cohort, France, 1996-99. HIV Med 2001; 2:84–88.
38. Mulligan K, Grunfeld C, Tai VW, Algren H, Pang M, Chernoff DN, et al. Hyperlipidemia and insulin resistance are induced by protease inhibitors independent of changes in body composition in patients with HIV infection. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2000; 23:35–43.
39. Kitahata MM, Rodriguez BG, Haubrich R, Boswell S, Mathews WC, Lederman MM, et al. Cohort profile: the Centers for AIDS Research (CFAR) Network of Integrated Clinical Systems (CNICS). Int J Epidemiol 2008; 37:948–955.
40. Hoenig MR. Implications of the obesity epidemic for lipid-lowering therapy: non-HDL cholesterol should replace LDL cholesterol as the primary therapeutic target. Vasc Health Risk Manag 2008; 4:143–156.
41. Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem 1972; 18:499–502.
42. National Institutes of Health (1998) Appendix 6. Body mass index: how to measure obesity. Clinical Guidelines on the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity In Adults: The Evidence Report. Bethesda, MD: NIH; (NIH Publication #98-4083), pp. 139–140.
43. Diggle P, Heagerty P, Liang K, Zeger S. Analysis of longitudinal data. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002.
44. Arribas JR, Pozniak AL, Gallant JE, Dejesus E, Gazzard B, Campo RE, et al. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, emtricitabine, and efavirenz compared with zidovudine/lamivudine and efavirenz in treatment-naive patients: 144-week analysis. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2008; 47:74–78.
45. Gallant JE, DeJesus E, Arribas JR, Pozniak AL, Gazzard B, Campo RE, et al. Tenofovir DF, emtricitabine, and efavirenz vs. zidovudine, lamivudine, and efavirenz for HIV. N Engl J Med 2006; 354:251–260.
46. Madruga JR, Cassetti I, Suleiman JM, Etzel A, Zhong L, Holmes CB, et al. The safety and efficacy of switching stavudine to tenofovir df in combination with lamivudine and efavirenz in hiv-1-infected patients: three-year follow-up after switching therapy. HIV Clin Trials 2007; 8:381–390.
47. Moyle GJ, Sabin CA, Cartledge J, Johnson M, Wilkins E, Churchill D, et al. A randomized comparative trial of tenofovir DF or abacavir as replacement for a thymidine analogue in persons with lipoatrophy. AIDS 2006; 20:2043–2050.
48. Llibre JM, Domingo P, Palacios R, Santos J, Perez-Elias MJ, Sanchez-de la Rosa R, et al. Sustained improvement of dyslipidaemia in HAART-treated patients replacing stavudine with tenofovir. AIDS 2006; 20:1407–1414.
49. Milinkovic A, Martinez E, Lopez S, de Lazzari E, Miro O, Vidal S, et al. The impact of reducing stavudine dose versus switching to tenofovir on plasma lipids, body composition and mitochondrial function in HIV-infected patients. Antivir Ther 2007; 12:407–415.
50. Claas GJ, Julg B, Goebel FD, Bogner JR. Metabolic and anthropometric changes one year after switching from didanosine/stavudine to tenofovir in HIV-infected patients. Eur J Med Res 2007; 12:54–60.
51. Gerschenson M, Kim C, Berzins B, Taiwo B, Libutti DE, Choi J, et al. Mitochondrial function, morphology and metabolic parameters improve after switching from stavudine to a tenofovir-containing regimen. J Antimicrob Chemother 2009; 63:1244–1250.
52. Lafeuillade A, Jolly P, Chadapaud S, Hittinger G, Lambry V, Philip G. Evolution of lipid abnormalities in patients switched from stavudine- to tenofovir-containing regimens. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2003; 33:544–546.
53. Buchacz K, Weidle PJ, Moore D, Were W, Mermin J, Downing R, et al. Changes in lipid profile over 24 months among adults on first-line highly active antiretroviral therapy in the home-based AIDS care program in rural Uganda. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2008; 47:304–311.
54. Valantin MA, Bittar R, de Truchis P, Bollens D, Slama L, Giral P, et al. Switching the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor backbone to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate + emtricitabine promptly improves triglycerides and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in dyslipidaemic patients. J Antimicrob Chemother 2010; 65:556–561.
55. DeJesus E, Ruane P, McDonald C, Garcia F, Sharma S, Corales R, et al. Impact of switching virologically suppressed, HIV-1-infected patients from twice-daily fixed-dose zidovudine/lamivudine to once-daily fixed-dose tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine. HIV Clin Trials 2008; 9:103–114.
56. Fisher M, Moyle GJ, Shahmanesh M, Orkin C, Kingston M, Wilkins E, et al. A randomized comparative trial of continued zidovudine/lamivudine or replacement with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine in efavirenz-treated HIV-1-infected individuals. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2009; 51:562–568.
57. Ribera E, Paradineiro JC, Curran A, Sauleda S, Garcia-Arumi E, Castella E, et al. Improvements in subcutaneous fat, lipid profile, and parameters of mitochondrial toxicity in patients with peripheral lipoatrophy when stavudine is switched to tenofovir (LIPOTEST study). HIV Clin Trials 2008; 9:407–417.
58. Young J, Weber R, Rickenbach M, Furrer H, Bernasconi E, Hirschel B, et al. Lipid profiles for antiretroviral-naive patients starting PI- and NNRTI-based therapy in the Swiss HIV cohort study. Antivir Ther 2005; 10:585–591.
59. Gallant JE, Staszewski S, Pozniak AL, DeJesus E, Suleiman JM, Miller MD, et al. Efficacy and safety of tenofovir DF vs. stavudine in combination therapy in antiretroviral-naive patients: a 3-year randomized trial. JAMA 2004; 292:191–201.
60. Martinez E, Arranz JA, Podzamczer D, Lonca M, Sanz J, Barragan P, et al. A simplification trial switching from nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors to once-daily fixed-dose abacavir/lamivudine or tenofovir/emtricitabine in HIV-1-infected patients with virological suppression. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2009; 51:290–297.
61. Shlay JC, Visnegarwala F, Bartsch G, Wang J, Peng G, El-Sadr WM, et al. Body composition and metabolic changes in antiretroviral-naive patients randomized to didanosine and stavudine vs. abacavir and lamivudine. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2005; 38:147–155.
62. Worm SW, Sabin C, Weber R, Reiss P, El-Sadr W, Dabis F, et al. Risk of myocardial infarction in patients with HIV infection exposed to specific individual antiretroviral drugs from the 3 major drug classes: the data collection on adverse events of anti-HIV drugs (D:A:D) study. J Infect Dis 2010; 201:318–330.
63. Valerio L, Fontas E, Pradier C, Lavrut T, Garraffo R, Dunais B, et al. Lopinavir/ritonavir combination and total/HDL cholesterol ratio. J Infect 2005; 50:229–235.
64. Montes ML, Pulido F, Barros C, Condes E, Rubio R, Cepeda C, et al. Lipid disorders in antiretroviral-naive patients treated with lopinavir/ritonavir-based HAART: frequency, characterization and risk factors. J Antimicrob Chemother 2005; 55:800–804.
65. Lapadula G, Torti C, Paraninfo G, Castelnuovo F, Uccelli MC, Costarelli S, et al. Influence of hepatitis C genotypes on lipid levels in HIV-positive patients during highly active antiretroviral therapy. Antivir Ther 2006; 11:521–527.
66. Torti C, Patroni A, Tinelli C, Sleiman I, Quiros-Roldan E, Puoti M, Castelli F. Influence of hepatitis C virus coinfection on lipid abnormalities in HIV-positive patients after highly active antiretroviral therapy. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2002; 29:315–317.
67. Polgreen PM, Fultz SL, Justice AC, Wagner JH, Diekema DJ, Rabeneck L, et al. Association of hypocholesterolaemia with hepatitis C virus infection in HIV-infected people. HIV Med 2004; 5:144–150.
68. Collazos J, Mayo J, Ibarra S, Cazallas J. Hyperlipidemia in HIV-infected patients: the protective effect of hepatitis C virus co-infection. AIDS 2003; 17:927–929.
69. Cooper CL, Mills E, Angel JB. Mitigation of antiretroviral-induced hyperlipidemia by hepatitis C virus co-infection. AIDS 2007; 21:71–76.
70. Bedimo R, Ghurani R, Nsuami M, Turner D, Kvanli MB, Brown G, Margolis D. Lipid abnormalities in HIV/hepatitis C virus-coinfected patients. HIV Med 2006; 7:530–536.
71. Di Giambenedetto S, Baldini F, Cingolani A, Tamburrini E, Cauda R, De Luca A. The influence of hepatitis C virus coinfection on the risk of lipid abnormalities in a cohort of HIV-1-infected patients after initiation of highly active antiretroviral therapy. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2004; 36:641–642.
72. Patroni A, Torti C, Tomasoni L, Roldan EQ, Bertelli D, Puoti M, et al. Effect of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and hepatitis C Co-infection on hyperlipidemia in HIV-infected patients: a retrospective longitudinal study. HIV Clin Trials 2002; 3:451–461.
73. De Socio GV, Bonfanti P, Ricci E, Orofino G, Madeddu G, Penco G, et al. Cholesterol levels in HIV-HCV infected patients treated with lopinavir/r: results from the SCOLTA project. Biomed Pharmacother 2008; 62:16–20.
74. Bollens D, Guiguet M, Tangre P, Rollinat L, Rachline A, Meynard JL, et al. Major hypertriglyceridemia in HIV-infected patients on antiretroviral therapy: a role of the personal and family history. Infection 2004; 32:217–221.
75. Duong M, Petit JM, Piroth L, Grappin M, Buisson M, Chavanet P, et al. Association between insulin resistance and hepatitis C virus chronic infection in HIV-hepatitis C virus-coinfected patients undergoing antiretroviral therapy. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2001; 27:245–250.
76. Stapleton JT, Bennett K, Bosch RJ, Polgreen PM, Swindells S. Effect of antiretroviral therapy and hepatitis c co-infection on changes in lipid levels in HIV-Infected patients 48 weeks after initiation of therapy. HIV Clin Trials 2007; 8:429–436.
77. Bedimo R, Westfall AO, Mugavero M, Drechsler H, Khanna N, Saag M. Hepatitis C virus coinfection and the risk of cardiovascular disease among HIV-infected patients. HIV Med 2010; 11:462–468.
78. Kotler DP. HIV and antiretroviral therapy: lipid abnormalities and associated cardiovascular risk in HIV-infected patients. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2008; 49(Suppl 2):S79–85.
79. Sabin CA, d'Arminio Monforte A, Friis-Moller N, Weber R, El-Sadr WM, Reiss P, et al. Changes over time in risk factors for cardiovascular disease and use of lipid-lowering drugs in HIV-infected individuals and impact on myocardial infarction. Clin Infect Dis 2008; 46:1101–1110.

antiretroviral therapy; cholesterol; dyslipidemia; HIV; lipid levels; nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors

© 2011 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.