Secondary Logo

CD4 cell-guided scheduled treatment interruptions in HIV-infected patients with sustained immunologic response to HAART

Maggiolo, Francoa,b; Airoldi, Monicaa,b; Callegaro, Annapaolac; Martinelli, Caniod; Dolara, Albertoe; Bini, Teresaf; Gregis, Giampietroa,b; Quinzan, Giampaoloa,b; Ripamonti, Diegoa,b; Ravasio, Veronicaa; Suter, Fredya

doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e328321b75e

Objective: To compare continuous HAART with a CD4 cell-driven scheduled treatment interruption (STI) strategy.

Methods: LOng Term Treatment Interruption study is a randomized, controlled, prospective trial. Patients with CD4 cell counts more than 700 cells/μl were eligible, and the immunologic threshold to resume HAART was 350 cells/μl. The primary end point was the development of an opportunistic disease, death from any cause or the occurrence of diseases, other than opportunistic, requiring hospital admission. Secondary end points were major adverse effects, virologic failures and therapeutic costs.

Results: Three hundred and twenty-nine patients were randomized 1: 1. Total follow-up was 1388 person-years (mean 4.2 years). Patients in the STI group stopped therapy for a total of 241 STI cycles, their mean off-therapy period was 65.3% of the follow-up. The primary end point occurred in 12.1% of patients on STI and in 11.6% of controls [odds ratio 1.05; 95% confidence interval 0.54–2.05]. A higher proportion of patients in the STI arm were diagnosed with pneumonia (P = 0.037), whereas clinical events influencing the cardiovascular risk of patients were significantly (P < 0.0001) more frequent among controls. Eight patients (4.8%) in the STI group and 11 (6.7%) controls developed viral resistance [odds ratio 0.79, 95% confidence interval 0.27–1.81]. The mean daily therapeutic cost was €20.29 for controls and dropped to €9.07 in the STI arm (P < 0.0001).

Conclusion: The two strategies may be considered clinically equivalent. CD4 cell-guided STIs seem a possible alternative for chronically infected individuals responding to HAART provided that CD4 cell decrements would be steadily maintained above a safe threshold.

aDivision of Infectious Diseases, Italy

bUnit of Antiviral Therapy, Italy

cMicrobiology and Virology Laboratory, Ospedali Riuniti, Bergamo, Italy

dDivision of Infectious Diseases, Azienda Ospedaliera Careggi, Firenze, Italy

eDivision of Infectious Diseases, General Hospital, Monza, Italy

fDivision of Infectious Diseases, Ospedale San Paolo University of Milano, Milan, Italy.

Received 24 June, 2008

Revised 14 August, 2008

Accepted 6 September, 2008

Correspondence to Dr Franco Maggiolo, Divisione di Malattie Infettive, Ospedali Riuniti, Largo Barozzi 1, 24128 Bergamo, Italy. Tel: +39 035269893; fax: +39 035253382; e-mail:

Back to Top | Article Outline


As the current regimens cannot eradicate HIV infection [1], persons living with HIV are recommended to stay on life-long medication therapy. Pill fatigue, adverse effects and resistance continue to limit the effectiveness of HAART [2,3]. Scheduled treatment interruptions (STIs) have emerged as a possible strategy to ameliorate these problems [4,5]. Theoretically, STIs may decrease the cumulative time a patient is exposed to antiretroviral agents, thus improving quality of life, reducing the emergence of drug-related adverse effects and the chance of selecting for drug-resistant viruses, and may reduce therapeutic cost for patients or the healthcare system. However, the role of STIs within the modern management of HAART remains controversial [6]. Although several experiences have documented that CD4 cell-guided STIs may be virologically [7,8] and immunologically [9,10] safe among chronically infected patients responding to HAART, the benefit and risks of STIs can best be determined by long-term, controlled studies intended and powered not only to evaluate the risk of resistance or the immunologic response, but also to compare clinical outcomes including disease progression, AIDS, major toxicities and survival [11].

We conducted a multicentre, controlled, prospective and randomized trial on a cohort of chronically HIV-infected individuals on effective HAART to address most of these open questions [LOng Term Treatment Interruption study (LOTTI)]. We chose to apply an individualized pulse therapy strategy, driven by CD4 cell count, and to compare it with conventional continuous HAART.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Study design and patients

The LOTTI study design was based on a previous clinical experience [10]. It is a randomized, open-label, controlled trial that compares two different treatment strategies. The patients, recruited from several centres in Northern Italy, had to be older than 18 years, with laboratory documentation of HIV-1 infection, a confirmed (at least two consecutive tests) CD4 cell count above 700 cells/μl, a confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA level lower than 50 copies/ml and a stable HAART defined as the same (at least three) drugs constantly assumed for at least the previous 6 months. Patients were excluded if they had ever received any immunomodulatory drug, presented a CD4 nadir lower than 200 cells/μl, were HBsAg positive and if they were pregnant or breast-feeding women. Eligible consecutive patients were randomly assigned (according to a centralized, computer generated random list) in a 1: 1 ratio to continue their ongoing treatment or to stop it. Patients randomized in the STI arm stopped their HAART drugs altogether [no differed discontinuation was implemented for patients receiving nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)] and were kept off therapy until their CD4 cell count dropped to or below 350 cells/μl (single determination), irrespective of their viral load. Once their CD4 cell count declined to this limit, they resumed HAART until their CD4 cell count was again above 700 cells/μl (single measure) and their viral load below 50 copies/ml. Another interruption of therapy was proposed at this time point. STIs were, therefore, individualized with the aim to keep CD4 cell count above 350 cells/μl with the shortest possible exposure to drugs.

Patients in the STI arm generally resumed the same regimen they had stopped. For all patients, a modification of HAART treatment was permitted at any time after randomization in the event of drug-associated toxicity or clinical progression of HIV disease (according to the US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention 1993 revised classification system for HIV infection) [12] or to comply with new indications (preferred regimens) of international guidelines for the management of HIV infection [13].

All patients provided their informed consent, and the trial was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of each hospital.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Outcome measures

The scope of the study was to analyse efficacy and safety of a pulse therapy strategy based on CD4 cell-guided STIs compared to a continuous, conventional HAART. The primary end point of the study was clinical and defined as death from any cause, progression of HIV infection because of the occurrence of any opportunistic disease [12] or development of any clinical condition (other than AIDS-defining events) requiring hospital admission. The trial power was calculated on this end point. Secondary clinical end points included symptomatic diseases requiring medical intervention, but not leading to hospital admission and the occurrence of grade 3 or 4 adverse events according to the toxicity table of the Division of AIDS of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). Data on lower-grade toxic effects were not recorded.

Secondary objectives of the study were to verify the dynamics of CD4 cell loss, HIV replication and resistance-conferring mutations selection after treatment interruption and to evaluate the economic impact of the STI strategy.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Monitoring, laboratory testing and data collection

Consecutive HIV-infected patients who met the enrolment criteria entered the study. Patients were followed up after 1, 2, 4 months and every 4 months afterwards, with clinical assessment and laboratory monitoring including haematology, biochemistry, triglycerides, cholesterol, CD4+ cell counts and HIV-RNA plasma levels. Unscheduled visits and laboratory tests were performed according to the clinical needs (i.e. evidence of adverse events or viral rebound or rapid immunologic decline).

The number of CD4+ lymphocytes was measured by flow cytometry. Plasma HIV-RNA was measured through a quantitative assay (HIV-RNA 3.0 bDNA; Chiron, Emeryville, California, USA) with a lower limit of quantification of 50 copies/ml. All other variables were measured by means of standard laboratory tests.

A genotypic analysis of the reverse transcriptase and protease gene was performed in patients of the STI arm within 2 months from each treatment interruption and in all patients with viral rebound more than 400 copies/ml while receiving HAART.

The possibility for the selection of resistance-inducing mutations was tested by means of reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of the reverse transcriptase and protease gene. PCR products were sequenced using ViroSeq-HIV-1 genotyping system and analysed by means of genotyping system software, version 2.5 (ViroSeq-HIV-1; Applied Biosystem, Foster City, California, USA) [14].

During the follow-up, AIDS-defining events, other clinical events and adverse events were looked for systematically at all scheduled and unscheduled visits. AIDS was diagnosed according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) classification system for HIV infection. Other clinical events were classified as ‘major’ if requiring hospital admission or ‘minor’ if manageable without hospitalization.

At each visit, the current use of drugs was recorded. Costs of the therapeutic strategy were calculated by adding the costs of individual drugs (as paid by the hospital pharmacy) with the costs of additional laboratory tests required to safely monitor STI (as indicated in the protocol) or to manage clinical and adverse events, to the costs of hospitalizations. Costs of the latter two variables were calculated according to the National Health System reimbursement wages that include all costs related to the care of a defined disease according to a predefined set of diagnosis [diagnosis-related group (DRG)].

Back to Top | Article Outline

Statistical analysis

The STI and control groups were compared according to the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle.

Descriptive results are presented as means ± standard deviation (SD), medians with interquartile range (IQR) and percentages with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Inferential statistics using either parametric or nonparametric tests was used, as appropriate for the data type. χ 2 or Fisher's exact test were used to analyse all categorical variables. Time-dependent variables were analysed using Kaplan–Meier product-limit estimates. The log-rank test was used to assess the difference between the survival curves. Analysis of variation (ANOVA) test and Student's t-test were used to analyse continuous variables. All tests were two sided, and a P value inferior to 0.05 was regarded as significant.

The trial power was calculated to assess equivalence between the two strategies under the assumption that, in the control arm, the primary end point would be observed in a proportion of patients less than 7% and that the same proportion in the STI arm would not exceed 10% with a maximum allowed 95% CI of 12%. According to the Blackwelder approach [15], 320 patients had to be enrolled for alpha value of 5% and 1-beta value of 80%.

All analyses were performed with the SPSS statistical software package for Windows, version 13.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA).

Back to Top | Article Outline


Baseline characteristics and patients' disposition

Three hundred and twenty-nine patients were randomized: 165 in the STI arm and 164 in the control group.

Table 1 summarizes key baseline characteristics. Treatment groups were well balanced at entry.

Table 1

Table 1

The total follow-up time was 689 person-years in the STI group and 699 person-years in the control group, with a mean follow-up time of 4.2 and 4.3 years, respectively. On average, patients in the STI group received antiretroviral therapy during 34.7% (mean 515 days) of the follow-up time; in the control group, the same value raised to 98.3% (mean 1530 days).

Back to Top | Article Outline

Immunologic results

Patients in the STI group interrupted therapy between one and five times. One hundred and nine patients stopped therapy only once either because they never reached the CD4 cell threshold to resume therapy (45 patients) or did not achieve the baseline CD4 cell level of 700 cells/μl after restarting therapy (64 patients). In the latter case, however, nine patients presented a short (<6 months) on-therapy follow-up at the moment the analysis was performed. Furthermore, 42 patients stopped therapy twice; nine for three times, four for four times and one for five times for an overall total of 241STI cycles. The mean duration of an STI cycle was 821 days (95% CI 721–919 days). CD4 cell counts in the control group fluctuated within a 200 cells/μl range (Fig. 1) indicating a ceiling effect due to the long mean HAART period (more than 5.5 years) (Table 1). HAART interruption induced in the STI group a constant decrement of CD4 cell counts (Fig. 1). At all time points, the mean CD4 cell value in the STI group was statistically different from the analogue value in the control group (P < 0.0001, Student's t-test). As a consequence of the individualized HAART intake in the STI group, throughout the follow-up, the CD4 cell count was, on average, 206 cells/μl lower than in the control group. However, the lower limit of the 95% CI for CD4 cell counts in the STI group was never inferior to 550 cells/μl. As a consequence, patients in the STI group, on average, spent 4.1% (59 days) of the follow-up at a CD4 cell level less than 350 cells/μl and 0.5% (8 days) at a CD4 cell level less than 250 cells/μl that was reached just sporadically.

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

Back to Top | Article Outline

Virologic and genotypic results

STIs were invariably associated with a rapid increment of HIV-RNA blood levels; however, patients promptly responded to the reintroduction of HAART. Two months after reintroduction of HAART, 76.3% of them presented a HIV-RNA level less than 400 copies/ml and this proportion raised to 97.4% after 4 months. HIV-RNA declined in all patients but one (see below) to less than 50 copies/ml within 8 months.

Eight patients (4.8%) in the STI group and 11 (6.7%) in the control group developed resistance-conferring mutations during the follow-up period. The 95% CI for this difference lies within 3.1 and 6.9%. Being the CI within ± the 10% limit, the two strategies may be considered, with this respect, equivalent [odds ratio (OR) 0.79; 95% CI 0.27–1.81].

As far as specific mutations are concerned, M184V/I alone was selected in one patient in the STI group and in two controls. Three patients in the STI group were selected for NNRTI resistance-conferring mutations alone (either K103N or Y181C), whereas the association of M184V/I and NNRTI mutations was observed in three patients in the STI group and in four controls. Thymidine analogue mutations (TAMs) were selected in two patients in the STI group and in four controls. The most common TAMs resulted in K70R (five cases), K219Q (three cases) and M41L (two cases). Finally, three patients in the control group were selected for primary protease mutations.

Only one of the patients, in the STI group, was selected for resistance-conferring mutations during the induction phase of a new HAART period. In the remaining seven cases, the development of mutations occurred after the complete suppression of viral replication (HIV-RNA <50 copies/ml) was already achieved, that is, during a maintenance period. All patients selecting for mutations responded to a new genotypic-based HAART.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Clinical results (primary end point)

There were 39 patients who reached the primary end point of the study (Table 2). The Kaplan–Meier estimates for the cumulative probability of occurrence of the primary end point were 0.006 after 12 months, 0.018 after 24, 0.061 after 36 and 0.074 after 48 months in the STI group, whereas the same values in the control group were 0.006, 0.055, 0.089 and 0.107, respectively. The difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.854, log-rank test). Overall, 0.5% more patients in the STI group reached the primary end point of the study; the 95% CI for this difference laid well within the ± 10% limit for equivalence (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.54–2.05) (Table 2).

Table 2

Table 2

All deaths were due to fatal myocardial infarction, and the only observed AIDS-defining event (progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy) occurred in a patient who steadily refused to restart therapy despite having reached the protocol-defined CD4 cell threshold to reintroduce HAART.

At the moment the primary clinical end point was diagnosed, 11 out of 20 patients in the STI group were off therapy. Their last CD4 cell count in all cases, but two, was above the 350 cell/μl threshold (mean 557; SD 177 cell/μl). In the control group, the clinical events were diagnosed in patients having a mean CD4 cell count of 891 cell/μl (SD 320 cell/μl).

Several other clinical events requiring medical care, but not leading to hospital admission, were observed (Table 3). The most common events were infective (namely herpes zoster, sexually transmitted infections, pneumonia and acute hepatitis), observed in 22 patients in the STI group and in 15 controls. Overall, the occurrence of infections was not different between the two groups (Table 2); however, a higher proportion of patients in the STI arm were diagnosed with pneumonia (P = 0.037). On the contrary, diabetes and hypertension (six cases each), both requiring drug therapy, were frequently diagnosed among controls and in only two patients in the STI arm. As a whole clinical events influencing the cardiovascular risk of patients, as defined by the American Heart Association guidelines for the prevention of cardiovascular diseases and stroke [16], were significantly (P < 0.0001) more frequent among patients in the control group (Tables 2 and 3).

Table 3

Table 3

Back to Top | Article Outline

Laboratory safety results

Both therapeutic strategies were well tolerated; however, a greater proportion of patients on continuous HAART (27.4%) showed a grade 3 or 4 alteration of laboratory parameters during the observational period. The same proportion among patients in the STI group was 20.6%. The difference was not statistically significant (95% CI for the difference −0.18 to 16.0).

The most frequently altered laboratory test was γ-glutamyltranspeptidase (γGT), followed by alanine aminotranferase (AST)/apartate aminotranferase (ALT) and triglycerides. In the STI arm, a grade 3 or 4 alteration of γGT was observed in 27 patients, AST/ALT were altered in 18, whereas a triglyceride increment was detected in one patient. Among controls, 33 patients showed a grade 3 or 4 increment of γGT, seven of AST/ALT and six of triglycerides.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Economic evaluation

The economic evaluation of the two therapeutic strategies was performed calculating a daily total cost taking into account the costs of drugs, laboratory exams to monitor the patient's status or to manage adverse events and clinical events and the cost of hospitalizations. To safely monitor patients in the STI group, virologic and immunologic laboratory tests were performed more frequently than currently recommended, increasing the total costs in this group. However, savings related to drug discontinuation overwhelmed these adjunctive expenses. As a consequence, considering the whole follow-up period, the STI strategy was significantly less costly than continuous HAART (P < 0.0001). The mean per patient daily total cost for continuous HAART was €20.29 (SD €4.73) and it dropped to €9.07 (SD €6.82) in the STI arm. This means that each patient on the STI programme induces a saving of approximately €4500 per year of follow-up.

Back to Top | Article Outline


In the last few years, the view that HAART must be lifelong has been questioned [17,18].

More recently, the strategies for management of antiviral therapy (SMART) study [11], a very large, randomized trial, has evaluated hard end points, such as the clinical outcome, disease progression or survival in patients undergoing CD4 cell count-guided STIs. According to the findings of this study, the episodic antiretroviral strategy, guided by CD4 cell counts, was found to be deleterious exposing patients to a 2.6 times greater risk of opportunistic diseases or death.

The SMART study is a cornerstone of the clinical experience on STI strategies, and any new data on CD4 cell-guided STIs must be discussed considering the strength of its results.

The results of LOTTI indicate that the long-term clinical outcome of a CD4 cell-guided STI strategy might be equivalent to continuous HAART. The discrepancies between our results and previously published data [11] may find an explanation in some of the experimental features of the two trial designs.

In the drug conservation arm of the SMART trial, the CD4 cell threshold to stop HAART was set to 350 cells/μl and that to resume it to 249 cells/μl. In the STI arm of this study, the same thresholds had quite different values: 700 and 350 cells/μl, respectively. Furthermore, over time, the mean CD4 cell count difference between the viral suppression and the drug conservation arms of both studies was similar (206 cells/μl). This does not surprise, the drug exposure in patients undergoing an STI being very similar in the two studies: 33.4% of follow-up (SMART) and 34.7% of the follow-up (LOTTI). However, being the starting point different, the consequences of this reduction in CD4 cell counts were also quite different. In our study, the lower limit of the 95% CI of this difference was never below an absolute value of 550 cells/μl and patients in the STI arm spent 95.9% of the follow-up time above the 350 cells/μl threshold. In the SMART trial, patients in the drug conservation arm spent only 67.9% of the follow-up above this threshold and spent 8.6% of follow-up below 250 cells/μl [11]. The latter level was only sporadically reached by patients in the LOTTI study who, on average, remained below the 250 cells/μl threshold only for the 0.5% of the follow-up (8 days).

These differences may explain the clinical outcomes observed in this study and in the SMART study. If viral replication and the inflammatory events linked to it are the triggering force of clinical events in the STI arm (e.g. cardiovascular diseases), the influence of immunological status on the final outcome may result determinant.

Not surprisingly, findings by the SMART researchers indicate that the interruption of antiretroviral therapy with CD4 cell count thresholds higher than those they used may result in lower risk of opportunistic infections or death from any cause. In the same study, after adjusting for the latest CD4 cell count and viral load measure, the hazard ratio for this end point was lowered from 2.6 to 1.5 (95% CI 1.0–2.1) [11,19].

Although, in most cases, not adequately powered to detect clinical differences, several other trials on CD4 cell-guided treatment interruptions may support these findings. The Trivacan study [20] used a CD4 cell threshold to restart HAART of 250 cells/μl (equal to SMART) and saw an increment in serious morbidity in the STI arm. Four other studies [7,10,21,22] used a CD4 cell count restart threshold of at least 350 cells/μl and did not report an increased risk of serious morbidity for patients treated according an STI strategy.

This suggests that the CD4 cell threshold selected to reintroduce HAART is important [23]. Whether a 350 cells/μl threshold should be considered of choice or a more conservative limit for restarting therapy (e.g. 400 cells/μl) would further increment the safety of STI strategies is unknown as trials exploring the use of such a threshold [10] were not powered to analyse the clinical outcome.

Besides the SMART trial, LOTTI is the largest controlled trial ever performed on CD4 cell-guided STIs. The total follow-up time was greater than 1300 person-years, and the mean follow-up time of our patients was 51.3 months compared with 20.7 months in the Staccato trial, 20.4 in the Trivacan study and 16 months for SMART. A longer follow-up increased our chances of observing slow to manifest or chronic clinically relevant events.

In this study, the primary end point was a composite clinical outcome comprehensive of the occurrence of opportunistic diseases, death from any cause and diseases or manifestations requiring hospital admission. This choice was based on the fact that the STI strategy, to be considered equivalent to continuous HAART, should not just prevent death or progression to AIDS, but should ensure a good health status, too. According to this end point, we documented that the STI strategy was clinically noninferior to continuous HAART.

Virologically, STIs were invariably associated with a rapid increment of HIV-RNA plasma levels, but all patients (with a single exception) responded to the reintroduction of HAART and HIV-RNA declined less than 50 copies/ml within 8 months. Strictly related to HIV replication is the occurrence of HIV drug resistance, a major concern in STI programmes. Genotypic analysis revealed that newly selected mutations occurred in 4.8% of patients in the STI group and in 6.7% in the control group. The 95% CI for this difference was within ±10% which allowed to consider the two strategies as equivalent [24,25]. Of note, only one of the patients was selected for resistance-conferring mutations during the induction phase of a new HAART period [26]. In the remaining cases, the development of mutations occurring after the complete suppression of viral replication (HIV-RNA < 50 copies/ml) was already achieved, suggests that treatment failure was possibly due to a suboptimal adherence or treatment fatigue, rather than strictly related to the STI strategy.

Tolerability drawbacks of pulse therapy seem to be limited. A reseeding of viral reservoirs is probably the rule during STI, and clinical consequences such as generalized lymphoadenopathy (three cases in our study) may occur, but are generally limited in time and seriousness. According to our data, the risk of grade 3 or 4 laboratory alterations was not significantly different in the two treatment arms.

Finally, STIs induced a marked and significant reduction of management costs, even after correction for additional laboratory costs due to a proper and safe monitoring of patients.

After the results of the SMART trial were made available, most researchers and clinicians thought that the natural conclusion was that once you have started HAART, you never could stop it again [27]. The SMART trial clearly demonstrated that an STI strategy could not be applied to all HIV-infected patients. The divergent results, we obtained, reopen the question whether specific patients' subpopulation or a different management of the STI programmes [28–30] could make this option still practicable. Our results may, also, be useful in the case a clinician would not be willing to implement STI strategies, but would be forced to manage patients who decide, on their own, to stop HAART. Knowing, not only the risks, the prognostic variables, but also the safe limits within which a patient could stay, would help clinicians to advise and manage such patients.

In summary, CD4 cell-guided interruption of antiretroviral treatment seems a possible alternative, strategic option for some chronically infected individuals responding to HAART and showing a high degree of immune reconstruction. According to our results, to make this option valuable, CD4 cell-guided STI programmes should be designed to preserve the immune function when patients are off therapy and to ensure that the CD4 cell counts can constantly be maintained above a safe threshold.

STIs of antiretroviral therapy warrant further careful prospective evaluation especially to investigate virologic and clinical outcomes in the very long period.

Back to Top | Article Outline


We gratefully acknowledge the collaboration and technical assistance of D. Nozza, C. Baldaccini, D. Colombo, J. Cortinovis, M.L. Innocenti, M. Mussetti and M.M. Pini.

This article was partially funded by research grants of AIFA program for independent research: grant no. FARM 78J9HM. F.M. has served as a consultant on advisory boards for Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, Tibotec; he has received lecture fees from Abbott, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck Sharp and Dome, Roche and has received research and educational grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Jansen-Cilag and Roche. F.S. has served as a consultant on advisory boards for Bristol-Myers Squibb and Roche; he has also served as speaker for GlaxoSmithKline, Roche and Boehringer Ingelheim and has received research and educational grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Jansen-Cilag and Roche.

F.M. contributed to protocol preparation, enrolling and monitoring patients, statistical analysis, manuscript elaboration; M.A. contributed to protocol preparation, data base management, statistical analysis; A.C. contributed to laboratory analysis, genotyping; C.M. contributed to enrolling and monitoring patients, data input; A.D. contributed to enrolling and monitoring patients, data input; T.B. contributed to enrolling and monitoring patients, data input; G.G. contributed to enrolling and monitoring patients; D.R. contributed to enrolling and monitoring patients; V.R. contributed to enrolling and monitoring patients: F.S. contributed to manuscript review.

Trial registration: identifier: NCT00433056.

Back to Top | Article Outline


1. Finzi D, Blankson J, Siliciano JD, Margolick JB, Chadwick K, Pierson T, et al. Latent infection of CD4+ T-cells provides a mechanism of lifelong persistence of HIV-1, even in patients on effective combination therapy. Nat Med 1999; 5:512–517.
2. D'Arminio Monforte A, Cozzi-lepri A, Rezza G, Pezzotti P, Antinori A, Phillips AN, et al. Insights into the reasons for discontinuation of the first highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimen in a cohort of antiretroviral naive patients. ICONA Study Group. Italian Cohort of Antiretroviral Naive Patients. AIDS 2000; 14:499–507.
3. Maggiolo F, Ravasio L, Ripamonti D, Gregis G, Quinzan G, Arici C, et al. Similar adherence rates favor different virologic outcomes for patients treated with nonnucleoside analogues or protease inhibitors. Clin Infect Dis 2005; 40:158–163.
4. Lisziewicz J, Rosenberg E, Lieberman J, Jessen H, Lopalco L, Siliciano R, et al. Control of HIV despite the discontinuation of antiretroviral therapy. N Engl J Med 1999; 340:1683–1684.
5. Lori F, Maserati R, Foli A, Seminari E, Timpone J, Lisziewicz J. Structured treatment interruptions to control HIV-1 infection. Lancet 2000; 355:287–288.
6. Montaner J, Harris M, Hogg R. Structured treatment interruptions: a risky business. Clin Infect Dis 2005; 40:601–603.
7. Ananworanich J, Siangphoe U, Hill A, Cardiello P, Apateerapong W, Hirschel B, et al. Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) retreatment in patients on CD4-guided therapy achieved similar virologic suppression compared with patients on continuous HAART. The HIV Netherlands Australia Thailand Research Collaboration 001.4 Study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2005; 39:523–529.
8. Guerrero Fernandez ML, Rivas P, Molina M, Garcia R, De Gorgolas M. Long-term follow-up of asymptomatic HIV-infected patients who discontinued antiretroviral therapy. Clin Infect Dis 2005; 41:390–394.
9. International Study group on CD4-monitored treatment interruptions. CD4 cell-monitored treatment interruptions in patients with a CD4 cell count >500 × 10 6 cells/l. AIDS 2005; 19:287–294.
10. Maggiolo F, Ripamonti D, Gregis G, Quinzan G, Callegaro A, Suter F. Effect of prolonged discontinuation of successful antiretroviral therapy on CD4 T cells: a controlled, prospective trial. AIDS 2004; 18:439–446.
11. El-Sadr WM, Lundgren JD, Neaton JD, Gardin F, Abrams D, Arduino RC, et al. CD4+ count-guided interruption of antiretroviral treatment. N Engl J Med 2006; 355:2283–2296.
12. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 1993 revised system for HIV infection and expanded surveillance case definition for AIDS among adolescents and adults. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1992; 41:9–12.
13. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). Guidelines for the use of antiretrovirals agents in HIV-infected adults and adolescents; 10 November 2003. [last accessed June 2008].
14. Larder BA, Kemp SD. Multiple mutations in HIV-1 reverse transcriptase confer high level resistance to zidovudine. Science 1989; 246:1155–1158.
15. Blackwelder WC. Proving the null hypothesis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1982; 3:345–353.
16. Pearson TA, Blair SN, Daniels SR, Eckel RH, Fair JM, Fortmann SP, et al. AHA guidelines for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and stroke: 2002 update: consensus panel guide to comprehensive risk reduction for adult patients without coronary or other atherosclerotic vascular diseases. Circulation 2002; 106:388–391.
17. Deeks SG, Hirscel B. Supervised interruptions of antiretroviral therapy. AIDS 2002; 16(Suppl 4):2981–2987.
18. Miller V. Structured treatment interruption in antiretroviral management for HIV-1. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2001; 145:29–37.
19. The strategies for management of antiviral therapy (SMART) study group. Inferior clinical outcome of the CD4+ cell count-guided antiretroviral treatment interruption strategy in the SMART study: role of CD+ cell counts and HIV RNA levels during follow-up. J Infect Dis 2008; 197:1145–1155.
20. Danel C, Moh R, Anzian A, Ba-Gomis O, Kauga C, Nzunetu G, et al. CD4-guided structured antiretroviral treatment interruption strategy in HIV-infected adults in west Africa (Trivacan ANRS 1269 Trial): a randomized trial. Lancet 2006; 367:1981–1989.
21. Henry K, Katzenstein D, Cherng DW, Valdez H, Powderly W, Vargas MB, et al. A pilot study evaluating time to CD4 T-cell count <350 cells/μL after treatment interruption following antiretroviral therapy ± interleukin 2: results of ACTG A5102. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2006; 42:140–148.
22. Ananworanich J, Gayet-Ageron A, Le Braz M, Prasithsirikul W, Chetchotisakd P, Kiertiburanakul S, et al. CD4-guided scheduled treatment interruptions compared with continuous therapy for patients infected with HIV-1: results of the Staccato randomized trial. Lancet 2006; 368:459–465.
23. Ruiz L, Paredes R, Gomez G, Romeu J, Domingo P, Perel-Alvarez N, et al. Antiretroviral therapy interruption guided by CD4 cell counts and plasma HIV-1 RNA levels in chronically HIV-1-infected patients. AIDS 2007; 21:169–178.
24. EMEA. ICH topic E9. Statistical principles for clinical trials. [last accessed June 2008].
25. Williams RL, Chen M-L, Hauck WW. Equivalence approaches. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2002; 72:229–237.
26. Barreiro P, de Mendoza C, Gonzalez-laboz J, Soriano V. Superiority of protease inhibitors over nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors when highly active antiretroviral therapy is resumed after treatment interruption. Clin Infect Dis 2005; 41:897–900.
27. Ananworanich J, Hirscel B. Intermittent therapy for the treatment of chronic HIV infection. AIDS 2007; 21:123–124.
28. Tebas P, Henry K, Mondy K, Deeks S, Valdez H, Cohen C, Powderly WG. Effect of prolonged discontinuation of successful antiretroviral therapy on CD4+ T cell decline in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients: implications for intermittent therapeutic strategies. J Infect Dis 2002; 186:851–854.
29. Mussini C, Bugarini R, Perno CF, Antinori A, Borghi V, Bertoli A, et al. Kinetics of CD4 cells after discontinuation of antiretroviral therapy in patients with virological failure and CD4 cell count greater than 500 cells/μl. AIDS 2002; 16:1551–1554.
30. Olsen CH, Mocroft A, Kirk O, Vella S, Blaxhult A, Clumeck N, et al. Interruption of combination therapy and risk of clinical disease progression to AIDS or death. HIV Med 2007; 8:96–104.

CD4 cell-guided scheduled treatment interruption; clinical outcome; costs; HAART; resistance

© 2009 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.