Hepatitis A virus (HAV) is a common infection in HIV-infected patients and in patients at risk of HIV infection, including men who have sex with men (MSM) and injection drug users [1–6] . Hepatitis A vaccine has been available since 1995 and is recommended for HIV patients, especially MSM, injection drug users and individuals with chronic liver disease [7,8] . A recent study suggested that a minority of eligible patients receive hepatitis A vaccine [9] . Several studies have concluded that HIV patients may have a poorer response to hepatitis A vaccine, but these studies were carried out before the HAART era [10,11] . More recent studies evaluating the response to hepatitis A vaccine were carried out, but the effect of HAART was not evaluated [12–14] . Factors determining a poor response to vaccine have not been well defined in the HAART era.
The HIV Program has followed all HIV-infected patients seen at the Atlanta VA Medical Center since 1982. We have prospectively collected demographic, clinical and laboratory data on all patients as part of the HIV Atlanta VA Cohort Study (HAVACS). Since 1992, 1319 patients have been tested for hepatitis A antibody (anti-HAV IgG). Positive anti-HAV was found in 583 patients before vaccination, documenting the high prevalence of hepatitis A in these patients. Of those testing anti-HAV negative, 659 were vaccinated with two doses of inactivated hepatitis A vaccine (HAVRIX) between 1996 and 2003.
All anti-HAV testing was done as part of the routine clinical care for these patients. A decision to measure the post-vaccination response was made by the individual providers.
Of the vaccinated patients, 214 were subsequently tested for anti-HAV IgG to evaluate the response using the ETI-AB-HAVK PLUS assay (DiaSorin SpA, Saluggia, Italy). Although the total HAV antibody test has not previously been recommended post-vaccination because of a high limit of detection of 100 mIU/ml using previous methods, this assay has been shown to have a lower limit of only 20 mIU/ml, similar to the level needed for protection from natural disease [8] .
We determined the effect of demographic, clinical and laboratory factors on the response to vaccine by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Statistical significance was determined on the basis of an alpha level of 0.05.
Overall, 130 out of 214 vaccinated individuals (60.7%) developed a positive anti-HAV IgG antibody. Response to vaccination was directly related to the CD4 cell count at vaccination (Fig. 1 ). The higher the CD4 cell count, the higher the likelihood of detectable anti-HAV IgG. By univariate analysis, a lower CD4 cell count at the time of vaccination, a lower nadir CD4 cell count and a higher HIV viral load were associated with a lack of response to vaccine. Age, race, HIV risk factor, the use of HAART and the presence of hepatitis C virus infection were not associated with the response. In a multivariate analysis, only the CD4 cell count at the time of vaccination was associated with an absence of response (P < 0.0001). A dose response was seen with a higher CD4 cell count at vaccination being associated with higher response rates to vaccination independent of the nadir CD4 cell count and viral load level. Patients with a CD4 cell count less than 200 cells/μl were 16 times more likely to be non-responders; a CD4 cell count of 200–500 cells/μl was associated with a 2.5 increased risk of non-response.
Fig. 1: Response to hepatitis A vaccine by CD4 cell count at vaccination.
We found that the CD4 cell count at the time of vaccination is the critical determinant of response to hepatitis A vaccine. Regardless of the nadir CD4 cell count, our data suggest that patients will respond to vaccine after HAART-associated immunological reconstitution. Early reports suggested that HIV-infected patients did not respond well to hepatitis A vaccine. A study carried out in patients with hemophilia demonstrated that seroconversion rates and antibody titers were significantly lower than in non-HIV-infected patients [15] . Two studies performed in MSM in the pre-HAART era suggested that HIV infection was associated with a lower rate of seroconversion than in non-infected men [10,11] . Three additional studies were carried out in patients receiving HAART, but few factors were evaluated with respect to the response rate. Valdez et al . [12] evaluated 31 patients receiving a ritonavir-containing regimen and found that 11 out of 15 patients (73%) responded to vaccine. Kemper et al . [13] studied 133 patients in a prospective, placebo-controlled trial during the HAART era, but they did not collect information on treatment. They found that patients with a CD4 cell count greater than 200 cells/μl had a 68% seroconversion rate compared with only 9% in patients with CD4 cell counts less than 200 cells/μl. Wallace et al . [14] studied 90 patients in the navy; 77% were on protease inhibitors. They found that 100% of patients with a CD4 cell count greater than 300 cells/μl seroconverted, compared with only 87% of patients with a CD4 cell count less than 300 cells/μl [14] .
Two recent unpublished studies add further data. Weissman et al . [16] found that only 50% of HIV-positive patients responded to hepatitis A vaccine. Responders had higher CD4 cell counts and were more likely to be women. Overton et al . [17] reported that only the suppression of viral replication (viral load < 1000 copies/ml) at the time of vaccination was independently associated with the response to vaccination; they found no independent association with a nadir CD4 cell count or the CD4 cell count at the time of vaccination. We have no explanation for the different results in this last study compared with our results.
It is not surprising that HIV-infected individuals do not respond as well to hepatitis A vaccine. Several vaccines, including those against influenza, tetanus, pneumococcal infection and hepatitis B, have been found to produce a decreased response in these patients [18–20] . It has previously been suggested that patients should receive vaccinations before immunological deterioration [7] . No specific recommendations have been made about patients presenting with low CD4 cell counts. We would suggest that patients receiving antiretroviral therapy should wait to receive vaccines, in particular hepatitis A vaccine, until immunological reconstitution, indicated by CD4 cell increases to more than 200 cells/μl, has been achieved.
The determination of anti-HAV IgG antibody should be considered in all HIV patients receiving hepatitis A vaccine. A lack of detectable IgG antibody would suggest repeating vaccination, especially if current CD4 cell counts exceed 200 cells/μl. The CD4 cell count at the time of vaccination is the critical determinant of response to HAV vaccine. The absence of an association with a nadir CD4 cell count suggests that patients will respond to vaccine after immunological reconstitution in response to HAART.
References
1. Katz MH, Hsu L, Wong E, Liska S, Anderson L, Janssen RS. Seroprevalence of and risk factors for hepatitis A infection among young homosexual and bisexual men. J Infect Dis 1997; 175:1225–1229.
2. Corey L, Holmes KK. Sexual transmission of hepatitis A in homosexual men. N Engl J Med 1980; 302:435–438.
3. Horvath J, Raffanti SP. Clinical aspects of the interactions between human immunodeficiency virus and the hepatotropic viruses. Clin Infect Dis 1994; 18:339–347.
4. Villano SA, Nelson KE, Vlahov D, Purcell RH, Saah AJ, Thomas DL. Hepatitis A among homosexual men and injection drug users: more evidence for vaccination. Clin Infect Dis 1997; 25:726–728.
5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Hepatitis A vaccination of men who have sex with men – Atlanta, Georgia, 1996–1997. MMWR 1998;
47 :708–711.
6. Ida S, Tachikawa N, Nakajima A, Daikoku M, Yano M, Kikuchi Y,
et al . Influence of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection on acute hepatitis A virus infection. Clin Infect Dis 2002; 34:379–385.
7. Kahn J. Preventing hepatitis A and hepatitis virus infections among men who have sex with men. Clin Infect Dis 2002; 35:1382–1387.
8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Prevention of hepatitis A through active or passive immunization: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR 1999;
48 :1–37.
9. Tedaldi EM, Baker RK, Moorman AC, Wood KC, Fuhrer J, McCabe RE,
et al . Hepatitis A and B vaccination practices for ambulatory patients infected with HIV. Clin Infect Dis 2004; 38:1478–1484.
10. Neilsen GA, Bodsworth NJ, Watts N. Response to hepatitis A vaccination in human immunodeficiency virus-infected and -uninfected homosexual men. J Infect Dis 1997; 176:1064–1067.
11. Hess G, Clemens R, Bienzle U, Schonfeld C, Schunck B, Bock HL. Immunogenicity and safety of an inactivated hepatitis A vaccine in anti-HIV positive and negative homosexual men. J Med Virol 1995; 46:40–42.
12. Valdez H, Smith KY, Landay A, Connick E, Kuritzkes DR, Kessler H,
et al . Response to immunization with recall and neoantigens after prolonged administration of an HIV-1 protease inhibitor-containing regimen. AIDS 2000; 14:11–21.
13. Kemper CA, Haubrich R, Frank I, Dubin G, Buscarino C, McCutchan JA,
et al . Safety and immunogenicity of hepatitis A vaccine in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Infect Dis 2003; 187:1327–1331.
14. Wallace MR, Brandt CJ, Earhart KC, Kuter BJ, Grosso AD, Lakkis H, Tasker SA. Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated hepatitis A vaccine among HIV-infected subjects. Clin Infect Dis 2004; 39:1207–1213.
15. Santagostino E, Gringeri A, Rocin A, Zanetti A, de Biasi R, Mannuncci PM. Patterns of immunogenicity of an inactivated hepatitis A vaccine in anti-HIV positive and negative hemophiliacs. Thromb Haemost 1994; 72:508–510.
16. Weissman S, Feucht C, Moore BA.
Response to hepatitis A vaccine in HIV-positive patients. In:
Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections . San Francisco, CA, 2004 [Abstract no. 830].
17. Overton ET, Nurutdinova DR, Sungkanuparph S, Groger RK, Seyfried W, Powderly WG.
Predictors of successful response to hepatitis A vaccine in HIV-infected persons. In:
Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections . Boston, MA, 2005 [Abstract no. 511].
18. Kroon FP, van Dissell JT, de Jong JC, van Furth R. Antibody response to influenza, tetanus and pneumococcal vaccines in HIV-seropositive individuals in relation to the number of CD4 lymphocytes. AIDS 1994; 8:469–476.
19. Keet IPM, van Doornum G, Safary A, Coutinho RA. Insufficient response to hepatitis B vaccination in HIV-positive homosexual men. AIDS 1992; 6:509–510.
20. Wong EKL, Bodsworth NJ, Slade MA, Mulhall BP, Donovan B. Response to hepatitis B vaccination in a primary care setting: influence of HIV infection, CD4 lymphocyte count, and vaccination schedules. Int J STD AIDS 1996; 7:490–494.