Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

RESEARCH LETTERS

Proviral HIV-DNA predicts viral rebound and viral setpoint after structured treatment interruptions

Yerly, Sabinea; Günthard, Huldrych Fd; Fagard, Catherineb; Joos, Bédad; Perneger, Thomas Vc; Hirschel, Bernardb; Perrin, Luca and the Swiss HIV Cohort Study

Author Information
  • Free

In HIV-1-infected patients with long-term undetectable viraemia on highly active antiretroviral treatment (HAART), we found that pre-HAART plasma viraemia and the baseline proviral DNA level were significantly associated with the viraemia setpoint during scheduled treatment interruptions. In long-term treated patients, pre-HAART viraemia may not be available, and in these circumstances proviral DNA, measured at the time of scheduled treatment interruption, can help to identify patients likely to reach a low viraemia setpoint after treatment interruption.

The long-term toxicity of antiretroviral therapy [1], the emergence of HIV-1 drug-resistance [2,3] and the cost of long-term treatment have driven new strategies of antiretroviral treatment including the delay of initiation of treatment [4], structured treatment interruptions [5–8] or simplified maintenance therapy [9–11]. In several clinical trials intermittent or simplified treatment has failed in a relatively high proportion of patients, whereas others have benefitted [5–11]. Such patients maintained stable CD4 cell counts and low viraemia off therapy. The predictors of virological failure in such studies were previous mono or bi-therapy, baseline drug resistance mutation(s) and high HIV-1-RNA levels [5–11]. The selection of patients who may benefit from treatment interruption or simplified therapy may be improved by taking into account treatment history, the detection of baseline resistance mutation(s) and an evaluation of the pool of infected cells by the quantitation of proviral DNA.

We have previously reported that in the Swiss–Spanish intermittent treatment trial (SSITT), which enrolled chronically infected patients with undetectable viraemia, only a low proportion of patients (17%) achieved a sustained viraemia level of less than 5000 copies/ml after long-term treatment interruption [8]. In that investigation, the viraemia level before the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) was the best predictor of virological response. We now assess whether baseline proviral DNA levels predict virological response in all Swiss patients included in the SSITT.

In the SSITT, enrolled patients had been on HAART without previous failure and had undetectable viraemia for at least 6 months. Their HAART was interrupted for 2 weeks and restarted for 8 weeks. After four of these cycles, treatment was definitively interrupted at week 40. Virological failure was defined for the 0–40 week period by HIV-1-RNA levels greater than 50 copies/ml after 8 weeks of re-treatment [8,12]. The quantification of cell-associated proviral DNA was performed as previously described, with a detection limit of 3 copies/106 peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) [13]. The Cox regression model was used to analyse the relative risk of virological failure.

Baseline PBMC samples were available at baseline for 87 out of 97 of the Swiss patients (90%) enrolled in the SSITT. At the time of initiation of HAART, the median CD4 cell count was 361 cells/mm3 (range 1–1035) and the median viraemia was 4.53 log10 RNA copies/ml (range 2.23–6.18). The median time on HAART before inclusion in the protocol was 27 months (range 9–45). All patients had detectable proviral DNA with a median of 2.25 log10 copies/106 PBMC (range 0.48–2.96). The proviral DNA level was associated with the pre-HAART CD4 cell count and viraemia (Spearman correlation R = −0.43 and 0.42; P < 0.001, respectively), whereas no correlation was found with the duration of viral suppression on HAART or baseline CD4 cell counts.

During the first 40 weeks, 26 out of 87 patients (30%) failed to decrease viraemia to less than 50 copies/ml after 8 weeks of re-treatment and were considered to be in virological failure. In univariate analysis, virological failure was significantly associated with pre-HAART viraemia, pre-HAART CD4 cell count and proviral DNA at baseline, but not with the baseline CD4 cell count (P = 0.48). In multivariate analysis, pre-HAART viraemia was the only independent predictor of virological failure (Table 1). No discriminating proviral DNA threshold for virological failure was observed.

T1-11
Table 1:
Predictors of virological failure to week 40.

On the other hand, baseline proviral DNA was significantly associated with the peak of viraemia rebound during the short period of interruption at weeks 2, 12, 22 and 32 (Spearman R = 0.51, 0.42, 0.53 and 0.44, respectively; all P < 0.001). The viraemia rebounds at week 2, 12, 22 and 32 were also significantly associated with the pre-HAART CD4 cell count (R = −0.51, −0.44, −0.42; P < 0.001 and R = −0.33, P = 0.008, respectively) and pre-HAART viraemia (R = 0.50, 0.49, 0.51, 0.39, respectively; P = 0.001).

Among the 56 patients who completed the four cycles and underwent the long-term interruption starting at week 40, pre-HAART viraemia (Spearman R = 0.66; P < 0.001) and baseline proviral DNA (R = 0.41; P = 0.002) were associated with the viraemia level after 12 weeks of final treatment interruption.

In previous studies, proviral DNA has been found to be a predictor of disease progression and virological outcome on HAART [14–19], and to predict the level of residual viraemia after HAART [20,21]. In this investigation, we have assessed the predictive value of proviral DNA in the context of treatment interruption in patients with undetectable viraemia on HAART. We found that proviral DNA predicted the failure to reach undetectable viraemia after re-treatment during short-term interruptions or the level of viraemia after long-term interruption. However, in multivariate analysis the pre-HAART plasma HIV-1-RNA level had a better predictive value than baseline proviral DNA. In clinical practice pre-HAART plasma HIV RNA corresponding to the viraemia setpoint is not always available either in the context of long-term treated patients or in patients treated at the time of primary HIV infection. In these circumstances, proviral DNA levels can be used as a surrogate marker of plasma HIV-1 RNA, and can therefore help to identify patients likely to reach low viraemia setpoints after treatment interruption. Such patients may potentially represent a group in whom the strategy of simplified maintenance therapy might be revisited.

Swiss HIV Cohort Study

The members of the above study are: M. Battegay, E. Bernasconi, H. Bucher, Ph. Bürgisser, M. Egger, P. Erb, W. Fierz, M. Fischer, M. Flepp (Chairman of the Clinical and Laboratory Committee), P. Francioli (President of the SHCS, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, CH-1011- Lausanne), H.J. Furrer, M. Gorgievski, H. Günthard, P. Grob, B. Hirschel, L. Kaiser, C. Kind, Th. Klimkait, B. Ledergerber, U. Lauper, M. Opravil, F. Paccaud, G. Pantaleo, L. Perrin, J.-C. Piffaretti, M. Rickenbach (Head of Data Center), C. Rudin (Chairman of the Mother and Child Substudy), J. Schupbach, R. Speck, A. Telenti, A. Trkola, P. Vernazza (Chairman of the Scientific Board), Th. Wagels, R. Weber, S. Yerly.

Sponsorship: This work was supported by the Swiss National Research Foundation (grant no. 3345-64120.00) and by the Swiss HIV Cohort Study (Swiss National Science Foundation, grant no. 3345-062041).

References

1. Carr A, Samaras K, Thorisdottir A, Kaufmann GR, Chisholm DJ, Cooper DA. Diagnosis, prediction, and natural course of HIV-1 protease-inhibitor-associated lipodystrophy, hyperlipidaemia, and diabetes mellitus: a cohort study.Lancet 1999; 353:2093–2099.
2. Richman DD, Bozette S, Morton S, Chien S, Wrin T, Dawson K, et al.The prevalence of antiretroviral drug resistance in the US. In: Abstracts of the 41st Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. Chicago, IL, 16–19 December 2001.
3. Grant RM, Hecht FM, Warmerdam M, Liu L, Liegler T, Petropoulos CJ, et al.Time trends in primary HIV-1 drug resistance among recently infected persons.JAMA 2002; 288:181–188.
4. Yeni PG, Hammer SM, Carpenter CC, Cooper DA, Fischl MA, Gatell JM, et al.Antiretroviral treatment for adult HIV infection in 2002: updated recommendations of the International AIDS Society – USA Panel.JAMA 2002; 288:222–235.
5. Neumann AU, Tubiana R, Calvez V, Robert C, Li TS, Agut H, et al.HIV-1 rebound during interruption of highly active antiretroviral therapy has no deleterious effect on reinitiated treatment. Comet Study Group.AIDS 1999; 13:677–683.
6. Ruiz L, Martinez-Picado J, Romeu J, Paredes R, Zayat MK, Marfil S, et al. Structured treatment interruption in chronically HIV-1 infected patients after long-term viral suppression.AIDS 2000; 14:397–403.
7. Dybul M, Chun TW, Yoder C, Hidalgo B, Belson M, Hertogs K, et al. Short-cycle structured intermittent treatment of chronic HIV infection with highly active antiretroviral therapy: effects on virologic, immunologic, and toxicity parameters.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001; 98:15161–15166.
8. Fagard C, Oxenius A, Gunthard H, Garcia F, Le Braz M, Mestre G, et al. A prospective trial of structured treatment interruptions in human immunodeficiency virus infection.Arch Intern Med 2003; 163:1220–1226.
9. Havlir DV, Marschner IC, Hirsch MS, Collier AC, Tebas P, Bassett RL, et al. Maintenance antiretroviral therapies in HIV infected patients with undetectable plasma HIV RNA after triple-drug therapy. AIDS Clinical Trials Group Study 343 Team.N Engl J Med 1998; 339:1261–1268.
10. Pialoux G, Raffi F, Brun-Vezinet F, Meiffredy V, Flandre P, Gastaut JA, et al. A randomized trial of three maintenance regimens given after three months of induction therapy with zidovudine, lamivudine, and indinavir in previously untreated HIV-1-infected patients. Trilege (Agence Nationale de Recherches sur le SIDA 072) Study Team.N Engl J Med 1998; 339:1269–1276.
11. Opravil M, Hirschel B, Lazzarin A, Furrer H, Chave JP, Yerly S, et al. A randomized trial of simplified maintenance therapy with abacavir, lamivudine, and zidovudine in human immunodeficiency virus infection.J Infect Dis 2002; 185:1251–1260.
12. Fischer M, Hafner R, Schneider C, Trkola A, Joos B, Joller H, et al. HIV-plasma RNA rebounds within days during structured treatment interruptions.AIDS 2003; 17:195–199.
13. Yerly S, Rutschmann OT, Opravil M, Marchal F, Hirschel B, Perrin L and the Swiss HIV Cohort Study. Cell-associated HIV-1 RNA in blood as indicator of virus load in lymph nodes.J Infect Dis 1999; 180:850–853.
14. McDermott JL, Giri AA, Martini I, Bono M, Giacomini M, Campelli A, et al. Level of human immunodeficiency virus DNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells correlates with efficacy of antiretroviral therapy.J Clin Microbiol 1999; 37:2361–2365.
15. Ngo-Giang-Huong N, Deveau C, Da Silva I, Pellegrin I, Venet A, Harzic M, et al. HIV-1 DNA in subjects followed since primary HIV-1 infection who suppress plasma viral load after one year of highly active antiretroviral therapy.AIDS 2001; 15:665-673.
16. Katzenstein TL, Oliveri RS, Benfield T, Eugen-Olsen J, Nielsen C, Gerstoft J, and the Copenhagen AIDS Cohort Study Group. Cell-associated HIV DNA measured early during infection has prognostic value independent nt of serum HIV RNA measured concomitantly.Scand J Infect Dis 2002; 34:529–533.
17. Pellegrin I, Caumont A, Garrigue I, Merel P, Schrive MH, Fleury H, et al. Predictive value of provirus load and DNA human immunodeficiency virus genotype for successful abacavir-based simplified therapy.J Infect Dis 2003; 187:38–46.
18. Tierney C, Lathey JL, Christopherson C, Bettendorf DM, D'Aquila RT, Hammer SM, et al. Prognostic value of baseline human immunodeficiency virus type 1 DNA measurement for disease progression in patients receiving nucleoside therapy.J Infect Dis 2003; 187:144–148.
19. Lafeuillade A, Poggi C, Hittinger G, Counillon E, Emilie D. Predictors of plasma human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA control after discontinuation of highly active antiretroviral therapy initiated at acute infection combined with structured treatment interruptions and immune-based therapies.J Infect Dis 2003; 188:1426–1432.
20. Yerly S, Perneger TV, Vora S, Hirschel B, Perrin L. Decay of cell-associated HIV-1 DNA correlates with residual replication in patients treated during acute HIV-1 infection.AIDS 2000; 14:2805–2812.
21. Fischer M, Joos B, Wong JK, Ott P, Opravil M, Hirschel B, et al. Persistence of attenuated viral transcription in the absence of virion production in lymphatic tissue of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infected patients on potent antiretroviral therapy.J Infect Dis 2004; 189:273–285.
© 2004 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.