Secondary Logo

Share this article on:

HIV lipodystrophy: risk factors, pathogenesis, diagnosis and management

Carr, Andrew

HIV lipodystrophy: risk factors, pathogenesis, diagnosis and management

HIV lipodystrophy is a heterogeneous syndrome, which has yet to be objectively defined, comprising peripheral lipoatrophy, central fat accumulation and lipomata, along with hyperlipidaemia, insulin resistance and lactic acidaemia. Both nucleoside analogues and protease inhibitors are involved, but there are also host factors that probably place some patients at greater risk. The pathogenesis is increasingly understood, with evidence of interference of several regulatory proteins such as sterol regulatory enhancer binding protein-1, the proteasome, mitochondrial DNA polymerase gamma and GLUT-4. Along with the issues of cosmesis and stigmatization, a principal clinical concern that arises with lipodystrophy is a possible increased risk of accelerated atherosclerosis. A variety of therapeutic interventions, designed to limit these risks, are under evaluation, but none is conclusively shown to be of value.

From the HIV, Immunology and Infectious Diseases Clinical Services Unit, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

Requests for reprints to Associate Professor Andrew Carr, HIV, Immunology and Infectious Diseases Clinical Services Unit, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney 2010, Australia. Tel: +61 2 8382 3359; fax: +61 2 8382 3893; e-mail: acarr@stvincents.com.au

Back to Top | Article Outline

Clinical and metabolic features

Lipodystrophy affecting HIV-infected patients was first described 4 years ago. The main clinical features are peripheral lipoatrophy of the face, limbs and buttocks, and central fat accumulation [within the abdomen, breasts and over the dorso-cervical spine (so-called ‘buffalo hump'), as well as other lipomata] [1–6]. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and abdominal computerized tomography have objectively confirmed these clinical findings, demonstrating peripheral fat loss, increased visceral fat, overall fat loss, and preserved lean body mass.

The overall prevalence of at least one physical abnormality is about 50% in otherwise healthy outpatients [1,7–19]. The differences between these prevalence rates (which ranged from 18 to 83%) may also have been confounded by patient sex, age, and type and duration of antiretroviral therapy, and the lack of an objective and validated case definition. Two prospective studies of previously antiretroviral-naive adults found a prevalence of 20 and 35% at 18 and 12 months of protease inhibitor-containing therapy, respectively, suggesting clinical variability in diagnosis may be another confounding factor [20,21].

Metabolic features significantly associated with lipodystrophy include hypertriglyceridaemia, hypercholesterolaemia, low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, insulin resistance (elevated C-peptide and insulin), type 2 diabetes mellitus, lactic acidaemia and elevated hepatic transaminases [1,11,12,14–26]. Protease inhibitor therapy has been linked mainly to insulin resistance and hypercholesterolaemia, and nucleoside analogues to lactic acidaemia. These metabolic abnormalities are more profound in those with more severe physician-assessed lipodystrophy [1,9,14]. Lipodystrophy has been associated in one study with low serum testosterone, but not with significant differences in sex hormone binding globulin, prolactin, cortisol, complement or tumour necrosis factor-alpha levels, all of which are involved in adipocyte homeostasis. Leptin levels are low, consistent with reduced fat mass [1].

Dyslipidaemia at levels associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease occurs in about 70% of patients, although this occurrence is probably not totally a result of lipodystrophy [1,15,17,27]. Hypertriglyceridaemia and low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol are seen in untreated HIV infection, and there is also very probably a background level due to genes, diet and pre-morbid body habitus.

The prevalence of diabetes mellitus is about 8–10%, with most cases identified after oral glucose loading [1,9,22–26]. Few cases appear to have symptoms such as polyuria, blurred vision or weight loss, and ketoacidosis is rare. A further 15% of patients have impaired glucose tolerance. Most diabetes has been identified in protease inhibitor recipients, but a causal relationship has not been established. No risk factor for developing diabetes in protease inhibitor recipients has been identified. Why diabetes is less common than the physical changes and dyslipidaemia is unclear, although development of type 2 diabetes usually involves both insulin resistance and impaired insulin secretion.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Potential risk factors

Several large cross-sectional studies and two prospective cohort studies have identified factors associated with lipodystrophy (Table 1). Factors seen consistently in cohorts include increasing age, current use and total duration of antiretroviral therapy, including nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) and of protease inhibitors, but not non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Less clear associations include gender, AIDS diagnosis, greater CD4 lymphocyte and HIV RNA responses to antiretroviral treatment, low body weight pre-therapy, elevated C-peptide and triglyceride levels after about 1 year of therapy, use of the dual protease inhibitor combination ritonavir–saquinavir, and use of the thymidine analogues, particularly stavudine. Whether there is a definite hierarchy of responsible drugs is not clear as this has not been disentangled from the duration of therapy with each drug and class.

Table 1

Table 1

Back to Top | Article Outline

Pathogenesis

The pathogenesis of HIV lipodystrophy is unknown. Risk factors identified in cohort studies, and several in vitro studies of adipocytes, skeletal muscle and hepatocytes, suggest a complex model to explain the pathogenesis of HIV lipodystrophy, involving antiretroviral therapies, and host and environmental factors (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Lipodystrophy

Lipodystrophy secondary to protease inhibitors may be due to inhibition of lipid and adipocyte regulatory proteins that have partial homology to the catalytic site of HIV-1 protease, to which all protease inhibitors bind [28]. In vitro studies have demonstrated that protease inhibitors can inhibit lipogenesis [29–35] by inhibiting the differentiation of proliferating pre-adipocytes to mature adipocytes, which have substantially lower levels of the transcription factors sterol regulatory element binding protein (SREBP)-1 and peroxisome proliferator activating factor-γ, with obvious defective maturation of SREBP-1 [33]. Indinavir did not affect pre-adipocyte growth or insulin responsiveness, nor the initial step of adipocyte cell differentiation. Cells that did develop were insulin resistant, which implies their capacity to store triglyceride would be impaired. Nevertheless, rosiglitazone, a peroxisome proliferator activating factor-γ agonist, can reverse these effects of indinavir.

Several lines of evidence suggest that some lipodystrophy may represent a mitochondrial toxicity caused by NRTI. Nucleoside analogues also inhibit adipogenesis and promote lipolysis, and may exert strong synergistic toxicity with protease inhibitors in vitro [36]. Second, lipoatrophy and buffalo hump have been reported in patients who have received only NRTI [13–16], and both can occur in HIV-uninfected patients with mitochondrial defects [37]. Third, lipoatrophy is linked with lactic acidaemia and, indeed, the presence of lactic acidaemia is associated with a higher risk for subsequent lipoatrophy [14,16]. Also, stavudine can deplete mitochondrial DNA in white fat of obese, but not lean, mice [38]. Finally, lipoatrophic men receiving NRTI show evidence of mitochondrial DNA depletion (but not mutation [39,40]). However, short-term adipocyte culture in the presence of a NRTI does not cause mitochondrial depletion or reduced adenosine triphosphate production [36].

It is less likely that the syndrome is a direct effect of HIV. Lipodystrophy is almost exclusive to patients receiving antiretroviral therapy, and has not been observed in patients with long-term, non-progressive HIV infection. Lipodystrophy has not been reported in untreated patients, even in the presence of high plasma HIV RNA load, and yet can occur in patients who receive antiretroviral therapy after primary HIV infection [41]. Also, visceral fat accumulation and lipoatrophy can improve after protease inhibitor and NRTI switching, respectively, without change in viral load [42,43]. Finally, most cohorts have found either a negative association between increasing HIV RNA and lipodystrophy or no association at all.

Growth hormone levels are significantly lower in lipodystrophic HIV-infected patients with visceral adiposity, as is seen in growth hormone deficiency [44]. Paradoxically, insulin-like growth factor type 1 levels were not increased, as would be expected with true growth hormone deficiency.

There are other unlikely mechanisms. Although many features of lipodystrophy are suggestive of Cushing's syndrome, this appears to have been excluded [4]. Fat accumulation could be a refeeding effect associated with improved appetite in the setting of suppression of HIV-1 replication; this would not explain lipoatrophy, however.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Hyperlipidaemia

Ritonavir therapy for 2 weeks in HIV-uninfected adults resulted in increased cholesterol, triglycerides, lipoprotein(a) and apolipoprotein B, with evidence of increased lipid production [45], establishing that these abnormalities can occur independently of HIV infection.

In hepatocyte cell lines, protease inhibitors interfere with the cholesterol synthesis, perhaps by inhibition of the proteasome, which regulates apolipoprotein B production. Interestingly, SREBP-1 is important in hepatic very-low-density lipoprotein production [46], and it has been hypothesized that SREBP-1 inhibition is the cause of increased hepatic lipid production [47]. In keeping with these data, a polymorphism in the SREBP type 1c gene is significantly associated with the presence of hypercholesterolaemia on protease inhibitor therapy, suggesting that this pathway is interrupted by protease inhibitors both within adipocytes (fat storage) and the liver (fat synthesis) [48].

Dyslipidaemia may also be a consequence of insulin resistance, of visceral fat accumulation and of lipoatrophy (release of stored lipid, and an inability to take up circulating triglycerides), as is the case in lipodystrophic adults without HIV infection [49].

Back to Top | Article Outline

Insulin resistance

Treatment of HIV-uninfected adults with indinavir resulted in rapid onset of insulin resistance but not hyperlipidaemia or changes in body composition, although treatment was only for 4 weeks [50].

Obesity and lipoatrophy may also play a part. In obesity-related insulin resistance, intra-abdominal fat mass correlates positively with insulin resistance [9,26]; while in lipodystrophies not associated with HIV, there is a correlation between loss of subcutaneous adipose tissue and insulin resistance [49]. Levels of leptin, a hormone secreted by adipocytes, are low in congenital and HIV lipoatrophies, and in mouse models of lipodystrophy, and leptin infusions and fat transplantation improve insulin resistance in such mice [1,49,51–53]. Lipoatrophic patients also have increased intramyocellular lipid in direct proportion to their degree of insulin resistance [53].

Protease inhibitors inhibit insulin-mediated glucose uptake via the GLUT-4, but not the GLUT-1, receptor in skeletal muscle, adipocytes and transfected oocytes [34,54–56]. This may be a result of reduced GLUT-4 translocation to the cell surface. Of note, GLUT-4 knockout mice are also lipoatrophic.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Diagnosis

Lipodystrophy is diagnosed subjectively, generally by the presence of lipoatrophy and/or fat accumulation on physical examination and/or patient report (preferably both). No objective parameter obtained by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry or computerized tomography has been reported to reliably diagnose lipodystrophy, perhaps because of the large natural variability in body fat mass (and also in distribution). In addition, the presence of abdominal obesity, insulin resistance or hyperlipidaemia in isolation are not useful individually for diagnosis, as these are common in the general population.

There is a clear need for objective criteria by which to diagnose lipodystrophy. Such criteria should assist industry, regulators and researchers in the standardization of recruitment to lipodystrophy studies and the reporting of lipodystrophy, in the assessment of drugs, drug combinations, drug classes and of different patient populations, and in the identification of risk factors. Also, such criteria would assist less experienced clinicians in making a diagnosis.

Five working case definitions or classification systems have been proposed [9,10,57–59]. These definitions are limited in that they were generated from studies performed in relatively few sites in selected (mostly male) patients. Furthermore, two studies had no objective body composition data and, importantly, no definition has been validated. One recent study has found that the presence of only one mild lipodystrophy feature identified on patient assessment was not reliable for diagnosis [59]. Although body composition and metabolic parameters differ in subjects with lipodystrophy, no objective physical or metabolic feature has been identified that reliably distinguishes lipodystrophy from healthy HIV-infected subjects. Consensus at the 1st International Workshop on Adverse Drug Reactions and Lipodystrophy in HIV was that the presence of at least one patient-reported physical change confirmed on physical examination may be useful for diagnosis, but it was agreed that this consensus was opinion based rather than evidence based.

Additional factors need to be addressed to develop an objective case definition for HIV lipodystrophy. These include the high variability in normal body composition, the fact that metabolic abnormalities common to lipodystrophy are also common in the general population, and the fact that both NRTI and protease inhibitors are implicated in lipodystrophy. It is also uncertain whether some probable toxicities of antiretroviral therapy (e.g. ingrown toenails, loss of libido, dry skin) are features of lipodystrophy, or represent unrelated, albeit drug-related, events.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Clinical significance

There are several possible sequelae of lipodystrophy. First, adherence to antiretroviral therapy may be compromised because of the cosmetic effects, leading to virological and even clinical failure [60]. Second, lipodystrophy could be stigmatizing in the same way as Kaposi's sarcoma and wasting once were.

The metabolic effects could lead to an increase in cardiovascular disease, and there are now several case reports of premature coronary artery disease in patients with few or no risk factors that were receiving protease inhibitor therapy [61–64]. However, a causal link has not been demonstrated and there are no data estimating prevalence or risk factors of cardiovascular disease in patients receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy. Some cases have developed in patients with very brief protease inhibitor therapy and may represent a prothrombotic effect of therapy rather than an atherosclerotic effect. The increase in risk has been estimated from available metabolic data using the Framingham equations to be 1.4 cardiac events per thousand years of therapy [65], although the risks will probably also depend on the presence and severity of other cardiac risk factors [66]. A global cohort study sponsored by pharmaceutical industry and the European Medicines Evaluation Agency is currently addressing this issue.

One further risk of occasionally severe hypertriglyceridaemia (levels > 20 mmol/l) seen with protease inhibitor therapy may be pancreatitis, but this association remains unproven [67].

Patients with diabetes mellitus or impaired glucose tolerance are at increased risk of microvascular diabetic disease such as retinopathy, neuropathy and nephropathy over the medium to long term. Whether it is appropriate to monitor patients on long-term protease inhibitor therapy for these conditions is not clear at present.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Management

There is no clinically proven therapy for any feature of lipodystrophy (Table 2). Factors that would affect a decision to treat any feature would include presence of symptoms, the status of HIV disease, the likelihood that a particular antiretroviral regimen would be long term, the severity of any feature, and the presence of one or more cardiovascular risk factors. In particular, it should be remembered that the efficacy and safety of metabolic interventions designed to prevent cardiovascular disease cannot be extrapolated at this time from studies of healthy adults. It may be that non-HIV lipodystrophy is a more relevant model, in which lipid-lowering and diabetic therapies tend to be far less effective, probably because of the lipoatrophy and central obesity that underlie these disorders.

Table 2

Table 2

Increased exercise can reduce central fat accumulation, but at the expense of increased peripheral fat wasting [68]. The role of diet has not been evaluated. Certainly, no diet should interfere with antiretroviral drug absorption or overall patient well-being. Gemfibrozil treatment in a randomized, placebo-controlled study resulted in a modest reduction in triglyceride levels, but without change in cholesterol, and appeared safe [69]. Atorvastatin may be safe and have some efficacy in lowering lipids, although pravastatin may be a better alternative in protease inhibitor recipients as it is not metabolized by cytochrome P450 3A4 [70,71]. Statins such as simvastatin that are metabolized by P450 3A4 should be avoided. Treatment of lipids alone may not affect cardiovascular risk, however, if diabetes is not also addressed (and vice versa). Metformin effectively improves insulin sensitivity and reduces visceral adiposity, without appearing to aggravate lactic acidaemia but also reduced peripheral fat [72,73].

Some agents may be inappropriate. Anabolic steroids are anabolic for muscle not fat, although increased muscle mass may partially disguise fat loss. Subcutaneous or intralesional growth hormone can reduce intra-abdominal adiposity and the size of buffalo humps, respectively, but if given parenterally may worsen lipoatrophy or precipitate diabetes [74–76]. Some statins and glitazones (insulin sensitizers and possible peripheral adipocyte growth factors) are metabolized by cytochrome P450 3A4, and their use with protease inhibitors could therefore increase the risks for myositis and hepatitis, respectively. Studies with rosiglitazone, which is not P450 metabolized, are underway.

Surgery (excision or liposuction) has been performed on some patients with severe fat accumulation, although fat may re-accumulate within months [77]. There is no report of implant surgery for fat wasting, an approach used for some forms of congenital lipodystrophy.

One theoretical treatment option is withdrawal or substitution of protease inhibitors or NRTI. Again, data suggest that protease inhibitor substitution with nevirapine, efavirenz, or abacavir, and stavudine withdrawal or cessation for at least 6 months may improve fat accumulation and/or insulin resistance (protease switching) and lipoatrophy (stavudine), respectively [42,43,78–81]. Nevertheless, lipoatrophy did not resolve some patients’ experienced virological rebound and it is unclear whether metabolic parameters can normalize. Furthermore, given the other issues that lead to virological failure, such as other adverse effects and human behaviour, it would seem probable that most patients will receive all antiretrovirals at some stage.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Conclusion

There has been significant progress in understanding the pathogenesis of HIV lipodystrophy. A case definition should be available shortly. The area of greatest need remains therapy and prevention.

Back to Top | Article Outline

References

1. Carr A, Samaras K, Burton S, et al. A syndrome of peripheral lipodystrophy, hyperlipidaemia and insulin resistance in patients receiving HIV protease inhibitors. AIDS 1998, 12:F51–F58.
2. Viraben R, Aquilina C. Indinavir-associated lipodystrophy. AIDS 1998, 12:F37–F39.
3. Miller KD, Jones E, Yanovski JA, Shankar R, Feuerstein I, Falloon J. Visceral abdominal-fat accumulation associated with use of indinavir. Lancet 1998, 351:871–875.
4. Lo JC, Mulligan K, Tai VW, Algren H, Schambelan M. `Buffalo hump’ in men with HIV-1 infection. Lancet 1998, 351:867–870.
5. Hengel RL, Watts NB, Lennox JL. Multiple symmetrical lipomatosis associated with protease inhibitors. Lancet 1997, 350:1596. [Letter]
6. Roth VR, Kravcik S, Angel JB. Development of cervical fat pads following therapy with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease inhibitors. Clin Infect Dis 1998, 27:65–67.
7. Gervasoni C, Ridolfo AL, Trifirò G, et al. Redistribution of body fat in HIV-infected women undergoing combined antiretroviral therapy. AIDS 1999, 13:465–472.
8. Falutz J, Turcot D. Considerations in the development of a case definition for HIV/HAART-associated lipodystrophy syndrome. 1st International Workshop on Adverse Drug Reactions and Lipodystrophy in HIV. San Diego, June 1999 [abstract 21].
9. Carr A, Samaras K, Thorisdottir A, Kaufmann G, Chisholm DJ, Cooper DA. Diagnosis, prediction and natural course of HIV protease inhibitor-associated lipodystrophy, hyperlipidaemia and diabetes mellitus. Lancet 1999, 353:2893–2899.
10. Lichtenstein KA, Ward DJ, Moorman AC, et al. Clinical assessment of HIV-associated lipodystrophy in an ambulatory population. AIDS 2001, 15:1389–1398.
11. Rozenbaum W, Gharakhanian, Salhi Y, et al. Clinical and laboratory characteristics of lipodystrophy in a French cohort of HIV-infected patients treated with protease inhibitors. 1st International Workshop on Adverse Drug Reactions and Lipodystrophy in HIV. San Diego, June 1999 [abstract 12].
12. APROCO Study Group on Metabolic Complications. A cross-sectional study of metabolic disorders and lipodystrophy in HIV-infected patients treated with antiretroviral combination therapy including protease inhibitors (PI) within a phase IV cohort study of PI: APROCO-ANRS EP11. 1st International Workshop on Adverse Drug Reactions and Lipodystrophy in HIV. San Diego, June 1999 [abstract 23].
13. Saint-Marc T, Partisani M, Poizot-Martin I, et al. A syndrome of peripheral fat wasting (lipodystrophy) in patients receiving long-term nucleoside analogue therapy. AIDS 1999, 13:1659–1667.
14. Carr A, Miller J, Law M, Cooper DA. A syndrome of lipoatrophy, lactic acidaemia and liver dysfunction associated with HIV nucleoside analogue therapy: contribution to protease inhibitor-related lipodystrophy syndrome. AIDS 2000, 14:F25–F32.
15. Miller JE, Emery S, French M, Baker D, Cooper DA. The Australian prevalence survey of lipodystrophy syndrome. Seventh Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections. San Francisco, January 2000 [abstract 201].
16. Boubaker K, Sudre P, Flepp M, et al. Hyperlactatemia and antiretroviral therapy in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study. Seventh Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections. San Francisco, January 2000 [abstract 57].
17. Thiebaut R, Daucourt V, Mercie P, et al. Lipodystrophy, metabolic disorders, and human immunodeficiency virus infection: Aquitaine Cohort, France, 1999. Clin Infect Dis 2000, 31:1482–1487.
18. Galli M, Veglia F, Angarano G, et al. Metabolic and morphological alterations under antiretroviral therapy: preliminary results of Lipodystrophy Italian Multicentre Study (LIMS). AIDS 2000, 14(suppl 4):S54. [Abstract]
19. Heath K, Hogg RS, Chan KJ, et al. Lipodystrophy-associated morphological, cholesterol and triglyceride abnormalities in a population-based HIV/AIDS treatment database. AIDS 2001, 15:231–240.
20. Martinez E, Mocroft A, Garcia-Viejo MA, et al. Risk of lipodystrophy in HIV-1-infected patients treated with protease inhibitors: a prospective cohort study. Lancet 2001, 357:592–598.
21. Bogner JR, Vielhauer V, Beckmann RA et al. Stavudine versus zidovudine and the development of lipodystrophy. J AIDS 2001, 27:237–244.
22. Lumpkin MM. Reports of diabetes and hyperglycemia in patients receiving protease inhibitors for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus infection. FDA Public Health Advisory, 11 June 1997.
23. Dube MP, Johnson DL, Currier JS, Leedom JM. Protease inhibitor-associated hyperglycaemia. Lancet 1997, 350:713–734.
24. Walli R, Herfort O, Michl GM, et al. Treatment with protease inhibitors associated with peripheral insulin resistance and impaired glucose tolerance in HIV-1-infected patients. AIDS 1998, 12:F167–F174.
25. Yarasheski KE, Tebas P, Sigmund C, et al. Insulin resistance in HIV protease inhibitor-associated diabetes. J Acquir Immun Defic Syndrom 1999, 21:209–216.
26. Hadigan C, Meigs J, Corcoran C, et al. Metabolic abnormalities and cardiovascular disease risk factors in adults with human immunodeficiency virus infection and lipodystrophy. Clin Infect Dis 2001, 32:130–139.
27. Grunfeld C, Pang M, Doerrler W, Shigenaga JK, Jensen P, Feingold KR. Lipids, lipoproteins, triglyceride clearance, and cytokines in human immunodeficiency virus infection and the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Clin Endocrinol Metab 1992, 74:1045–1052.
28. Carr A, Samaras K, Chisholm DJ, Cooper DA. Pathogenesis of HIV protease inhibitor-associated syndrome of peripheral lipodystrophy, hyperlipidaemia and insulin resistance. Lancet 1998, 351:1881–1883.
29. Lenhard JM, Weiel JE, Paulik MA, et al. HIV protease inhibitors block adipogenesis and increase lipolysis in vitro. Antiviral Res 2000, 47:121–129.
30. Zhang B, MacNaul K, Szalkowski D, Li Z, Berger J, Moller DE. Inhibition of adipocyte differentiation by HIV protease inhibitors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1999, 84:4274–4277.
31. Lenhard J, Weiel JE, Paulik MA, Furfine ES. Stimulation of vitamin A1 acid signaling by the HIV protease inhibitor indinavir. Biochem Pharmacol 2000, 59:1063–1068.
32. Wentworth JM, Burris TP, Chatterjee VKK. HIV protease inhibitors block human preadipocyte differentiation, but not via the PPARγ/RXR heterodimer. J Endocrin 2000, 164:R7–R10.
33. Caron M, Auclair M, Vigouroux C, Glorian M, Forest C, Capeau J. The HIV protease inhibitor indinavir impairs sterol regulatory element-binding protein-1 intranuclear localization, inhibits preadipocyte differentiation, and induces insulin resistance. Diabetes 2001, 50:1378–1388.
34. Rudich A, Vanounou S, Riesenberg K et al. The HIV protease inhibitor nelfinavir induces insulin resistance and increases basal lipolysis in 3TC-L1 adipocytes. Diabetes 2001, 50:1425–1431.
35. Dowell P, Flexner C, Kwiterovich PO, Lane MD. Suppression of preadipocyte differentiation and promotion of adipocyte death by HIV protease inhibitors. J Biol Chem 2000, 275:41325–41332.
36. Parker RA, Meyers DS, Andrews BA, Flint OP, Durham SK. Effects of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and HIV protease inhibitors on adipogenesis and adipocyte metabolism. 2nd International Workshop on Adverse Drug Reactions and Lipodystrophy in HIV. Toronto, September 2000 [abstract O4].
37. Brinkman K, Smeitink JA, Romijn JA, Reiss P. Mitochondrial toxicity induced by nucleoside-analogue reverse-transcriptase inhibitors is a key factor in the pathogenesis of antiretroviral-therapy-related lipodystrophy. Lancet 1999, 354:1112–1125.
38. Gaou I, Malliti M, Guimont MC, et al. Effects of stavudine on mitochondrial genome and fatty acid oxidation in lean and obese mice. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2001, 297:516–523.
39. Shikuma C, Hu N, Milne C, et al. Mitochondrial DNA decrease in subcutaneous adipose tissue of HIV infected individuals with peripheral lipoatrophy. AIDS 2001, 15:1801–1809.
40. Walker UA, Bickel M, Lütke-Volksbeck SI, et al. Decrease of mitochondrial DNA content in adipose tissue of HIV-infected patients treated with NRTIs. 2nd International Workshop on Adverse Drug Reactions and Lipodystrophy in HIV. Toronto, September 2000 [abstract O6].
41. Miller J, Carr A, Emery S, Law MG, Grey P, Smith D, Cooper DA. Lipodystrophy following antiretroviral therapy of primary HIV infection. AIDS 2000, 14:2406–2407.
42. Carr A, Hudson J, Chuah J, et al. HIV protease inhibitor substitution in patients with lipodystrophy: a randomised, multicentre, open-label study. AIDS 2001, 15:1811–1822.
43. Saint-Marc T, Touraine J-L. The effects of discontinuing stavudine therapy on clinical and metabolic abnormalities in patients suffering from lipodystrophy. AIDS 1999, 13:2188–2189.
44. Rietschel P, Hadigan C, Corcoran C, et al. Assessment of growth hormone dynamics in human immunodeficiency virus-related lipodystrophy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001, 86:504–510.
45. Purnell J, Zambon A, Knopp R, et al. Effect of ritonavir on lipids and post-heparin lipase activities in normal subjects. AIDS 2000, 14:51–57.
46. Distler O, Cooper DA, Deckelbaum RJ, Sturley SL. Hyperlipidemia and inhibitors of HIV protease. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2001, 4:99–103.
47. Mooser V, Carr A. Antiretroviral therapy-associated hyperlipidaemia in HIV disease. Curr Opin Lipidol 2001, 12:313–319.
48. Miserez AR, Barella L, Muller PY, et al. Hyperlipoproteinemia in HIV patients is linked to Sterol-Regulatory Elemnt Binding Protein (SREBP) 1c. Eighth Conference on Retrovirus and Opportunistic Infections. Chicago, February 2001 [abstract 500].
49. Garg A. Lipodystrophies. Am J Med 2000, 108:143–152.
50. Noor MA, Lo JC, Mulligan K, et al. Metabolic effects of indinavir in healthy HIV-seronegative men. AIDS 2001, 15:F11–F18.
51. Shimomura I, Hammer RE, Ikemoto S, Brown MS, Goldstein JL. Leptin reverses insulin resistance and diabetes mellitus in mice with congenital lipodystrophy. Nature 1999, 401:73–76.
52. Gavrilova O, Marcus-Samuels B, Graham D, et al. Surgical implantation of adipose tissue reverses diabetes in lipoatrophic mice. J Clin Invest 2000, 105: 271–278.
53. Gan SK, Samaras K, Thompson CH, et al. Relationship of visceral and muscle cell lipid with insulin sensitivity in HIV-1-infected men with and without protease inhibitor-related lipodystrophy. Diabetes (in press).
54. Nolte LA, Yarasheski KE, Kawanaka K, Fisher J, Le N Holloszy J. The HIV protease inhibitor indinavir decreases insulin-and contraction-stimulated glucose transport in skeletal muscle. Diabetes 2001, 50:1397–1401.
55. Murata H, Hruz PW, Mueckler M. The mechanism of insulin resistance caused by HIV protease inhibitor therapy. J Biol Chem 2000, 275:20251–20254.
56. Schutt M, Meier M, Meyer M, Klein J, Areis SP, Klein HH. The HIV-1 protease inhibitor indinavir impairs insulin signaling in HepG2 hepatoma cells. Diabetologia 2000, 43:1145–1148.
57. Kingslet L, Smit E, Riddler S, et al. Prevalence of lipodystrophy and metabolic abnormalities in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (MACS). Eighth Conference on Retrovirus and Opportunistic Infections. Chicago, February 2001 [abstract 538].
58. Saint-Marc T, Partisani M, Poizot-Martin I, et al. Fat distribution evaluated by computed tomography and metabolic abnormalities in patients undergoing antiretroviral therapy: preliminary results of the LIPOCO study. AIDS 2000, 14:37–49.
59. Belloso W, Ivalo S, Perman M, et al. Associated features of lipodystrophy may change significantly with definition criteria. 1st IAS Conference on HIV Pathogenesis and Treatment. Buenos Aires, June 2001 [abstract 507].
60. Montaner J. Current controversies in antiretroviral therapy and potential solutions: translating science into action. 1st IAS Conference on HIV Pathogenesis and Treatment. Buenos Aires, June 2001 [abstract PL2].
61. Henry K, Melroe H, Huebsch J, et al. Severe premature coronary artery disease with protease inhibitors. Lancet 1998, 351:1328. [Letter]
62. Behrens G, Schimdt H, Meyer D, et al. Vascular complications associated with HIV protease inhibitors. Lancet 1998, 351:1958. [Letter]
63. Flynn TE, Bricker LA. Myocardial infarction in HIV-infected men receiving protease inhibitors. Ann Intern Med 1999, 131:258. [Letter]
64. Koppel K, Bratt G, Rajs J. Sudden cardiac death in a patient on 2 years of highly active antiretroviral treatment: a case report. AIDS 1999, 13:1993–1994.
65. Grunfeld C. Distribution in lipid metabolism due to HIV infection and its therapy. Sixth Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections. Chicago, February 1999 [abstract S3].
66. Egger M. Metabolic complications of HAART: need for perspective. 2nd International Workshop on Adverse Drug Reactions and Lipodystrophy in HIV. Toronto, September 2000 [abstract O23].
67. Perry RC, Cushing HE, Deeg MA, Prince MJ. Ritonavir, triglycerides, and pancreatitis. Clin Infect Dis 1999, 28:161–162.
68. Roubenoff R, Weiss L, McDermott A, Heflin T, Clouthier GJ, Wood M, Gorbach S. A pilot study of exercise training to reduce trunk fat in adults with HIV-associated fat redistribution. AIDS 1999, 13:1373–1375.
69. Miller J, Carr A, Brown D, Cooper DA. A randomised, double-blind study of gemfibrozil (GF) for the treatment of protease inhibitor-associated hypertriglyceridaemia. Eighth Conference on Retrovirus and Opportunistic Infections. Chicago, February 2001 [abstract 205].
70. Henry K, Melroe H, Huebesch J, et al. Atorvastatin and gemfibrozil for protease inhibitor-related lipid abnormalities. Lancet 1998, 352:1031. [Letter]
71. Baldini F, Di Giambenedetto S, Cingolani A, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of pravastatin for the treatment of HIV-1 protease inhibitor-associated hyperlipidaemia: a pilot study. AIDS 2000, 14:1660–1662.
72. Saint-Marc T, Touraine J-L. Effects of metformin on insulin resistance and central adiposity in patients receiving effective protease inhibitor therapy. AIDS 1999, 13:1000–1002.
73. Hadigan C, Corcoran C, Basgoz N, Davis B, Sax P, Grinspoon S. Metformin in the treatment of HIV lipodystrophy syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2000, 284:472–477.
74. Engelson ES, Glesby M, Sheikhan J, et al. Effect of recombinant human growth hormone in the treatment of visceral fat accumulation in HIV infection: interim analysis. 1st International Workshop on Adverse Drug Reactions and Lipodystrophy in HIV. San Diego, June 1999 [abstract 6].
75. Mauss S, Wolf E, Jaeger H. Reversal of protease inhibitor-related visceral abdominal fat accumulation with recombinant human growth hormone. Ann Intern Med 1999, 131:313–314.
76. Wanke C, Gerrior J, Kantaros J, Coakley E, Albrecht M. Recombinant human growth hormone improves the fat redistribution syndrome (lipodystrophy) in patients with HIV. AIDS 1999, 13:2099–2103.
77. Ponce-de-Leon S, Iglesias M, Ceballos J, Ostrosky-Zeichner L. Liposuction for protease-inhibitor-associated lipodystrophy. Lancet 1999, 353:1244. [Letter]
78. Martinez E, Conget I, Lozano L, Casamitjana R, Gatell JM. Reversion of metabolic abnormalities after switching from HIV-1 protease inhibitors to nevirapine. AIDS 1999, 13: 805–810.
79. Martinez E, Garcia-Viejo MA, Blanco JL, et al. Impact of switching from human immunodeficiency virus type 1protease inhibitors to efavirenz in successfully treated adults with lipodystrophy. Clin Infect Dis 2000, 31:1266–1273.
80. Walli R, Huster K, Bogner JR, et al. Switching from protease inhibitors to abacavir improves insulin sensitivity and fasting lipids – 12 month follow-up. Eighth Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections. Chicago, February 2001 [abstract 672].
81. Ruiz L, Negredo E, Domingo P, et al. Antiretroviral treatment simplification with nevirapine in protease inhibitor-experienced patients with HIV-associated lipodystrophy. J AIDS 2001, 27: 229–236.
Keywords:

HIV; lipdystrophy; complications; lipids; lactate

© 2003 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.