Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

A modeling framework to inform preexposure prophylaxis initiation and retention scale-up in the context of ‘Getting to Zero’ initiatives

Khanna, Aditya S.a,b,*; Schneider, John A.a,b,*; Collier, Nicholsonc; Ozik, Jonathanc; Issema, Rodala,b; di Paola, Angelad; Skwara, Abigaila,b; Ramachandran, Arthia,b; Webb, Jeannettea,b; Brewer, Russella,b; Cunningham, Williame; Hilliard, Charlesf; Ramani, Santhoshinia,b; Fujimoto, Kayod; Harawa, Ninaf,g for the BARS Study Group and Getting to Zero IL Research Evaluation and Data (RED) Committee

doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000002290
EPIDEMIOLOGY AND SOCIAL
Buy
SDC

Objective(s): ‘Getting to Zero’ (GTZ) initiatives aim to eliminate new HIV infections over a projected time frame. Increased preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uptake among populations with the highest HIV incidence, such as young Black MSM, is necessary to accomplish this aim. Agent-based network models (ABNMs) can help guide policymakers on strategies to increase PrEP uptake.

Design: Effective PrEP implementation requires a model that incorporates the dynamics of interventions and dynamic feedbacks across multiple levels including virus, host, behavior, networks, and population. ABNMs are a powerful tool to incorporate these processes.

Methods: An ABNM, designed for and parameterized using data for young Black MSM in Illinois, was used to compare the impact of PrEP initiation and retention interventions on HIV incidence after 10 years, consistent with GTZ timelines. Initiation interventions selected individuals in serodiscordant partnerships, or in critical sexual network positions, and compared with a controlled setting where PrEP initiators were randomly selected. Retention interventions increased the mean duration of PrEP use. A combination intervention modeled concurrent increases in PrEP initiation and retention.

Results: Selecting HIV-negative individuals for PrEP initiation in serodiscordant partnerships resulted in the largest HIV incidence declines, relative to other interventions. For a given PrEP uptake level, distributing effort between increasing PrEP initiation and retention in combination was approximately as effective as increasing only one exclusively.

Conclusion: Simulation results indicate that expanded PrEP interventions alone may not accomplish GTZ goals within a decade, and integrated scale-up of PrEP, antiretroviral therapy, and other interventions might be necessary.

aChicago Center for HIV Elimination

bDepartment of Medicine

cConsortium for Advanced Science and Engineering, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois

dCenter for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), Houston, Texas

eDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of California, Los Angeles

fDepartment of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Charles R. Drew University

gDepartment of Epidemiology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Correspondence to Aditya S. Khanna, Chicago Center for HIV Elimination, The University of Chicago, 5837 S Maryland Ave, MC 5065, Chicago, IL 60637, USA. Tel: +1 773 834 5635; fax: +1 773 702 8998; e-mail: akhanna@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu

Received 4 December, 2018

Revised 13 March, 2019

Accepted 15 March, 2019

Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text and are provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal's Website (http://www.AIDSonline.com).

Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.