Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Share this article on:

A community trial of the impact of improved sexually transmitted disease treatment on the HIV epidemic in rural Tanzania: 2. Baseline survey results

Grosskurth Heiner; Mosha, Frank; Todd, James; Senkoro, Kesheni; Newell, James; Klokke, Arnoud; Changalucha, John; West, Beryl; Mayaud, Philippe; Gavyole, Awena; Gabone, Reverianus; Mabey, David; Hayes, Richard
Epidemology and Social: PDF Only

ObjectivesTo determine baseline HIV prevalence in a trial of improved sexually transmitted disease (STD) treatment, and to investigate risk factors for HIV. To assess comparability of intervention, and comparison communities with respect to HIV/STD prevalence, and risk factors. To assess adequacy of sample size.

SettingTwelve communities in Mwanza Region, Tanzania: one matched pair of roadside communities, four pairs of rural communities, and one pair of island communities. One community from each pair was randomly allocated to receive the STD intervention following the baseline survey.

MethodsApproximately 1000 adults aged 15–54 years were randomly sampled from each community. Subjects were interviewed, and HIV, and syphilis serology performed. Men with a positive leucocyte esterase dipstick test on urine, or reporting a current STD, were tested for urethral infections.

ResultsA total of 12 534 adults were enrolled. Baseline HIV prevalences were 7.7% (roadside), 3.8% (rural), and 1.8% (islands). Associations were observed with marital status, injections, education, travel, history of STD, and syphilis serology. Prevalence was higher in circumcized men, but not significantly after adjusting for confounders. Intervention, and comparison communities were similar in the prevalence of HIV (3.8 versus 4.4%), active syphilis (8.7 versus 8.2%), and most recorded risk factors. Within-pair variability in HIV prevalence was close to the value assumed for sample size calculations.

ConclusionsThe trial cohort was successfully established. Comparability of intervention, and comparison communities at baseline was confirmed for most factors. Matching appears to have achieved a trial of adequate sample size. The appartent lack of a protective effect of male circumcision contrasts with other studies in Africa.

© Lippincott-Raven Publishers.