Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Which Cutoffs for Secondary V˙O2max Criteria Are Robust to Diurnal Variations?

KNAIER, RAPHAEL1; NIEMEYER, MAX2; WAGNER, JONATHAN1; INFANGER, DENIS1; HINRICHS, TIMO1; KLENK, CHRISTOPHER1; FRUTIG, SABRINA1; CAJOCHEN, CHRISTIAN3,4; SCHMIDT-TRUCKSäSS, ARNO1

Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise: May 2019 - Volume 51 - Issue 5 - p 1006–1013
doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001869
APPLIED SCIENCES
Buy
SDC

Purpose The aim was to determine the minimum maximum oxygen uptake (V˙O2max) criteria cut-offs in highly trained athletes (i.e., maximum RER [RERmax], maximum HR [HRmax], maximum RPE [RPEmax], and maximum blood lactate concentration [BLmax]) necessary to determine maximum oxygen uptake (V˙O2max) during cardiopulmonary exercise tests (CPET), by balancing type I and type II errors. A further aim was to investigate if the defined cutoffs would be robust to diurnal and to day-to-day variations.

Methods Data from two CPET studies involving young athletes were analyzed. In the first study, 70 male participants performed one CPET until exhaustion to define cutoffs. In the second study, eight males and five females performed one CPET on seven consecutive days at six different times of day (i.e., diurnal variation). The time of the CPET was identical on the sixth and seventh days (i.e., day-to-day variation). To ensure comparability both studies were carried out under the same conditions.

Results Participants’ mean V˙O2max was 63.0 ± 5.3 mL·kg−1·min−1. RERmax ≥1.10 was reached by 100%, HRmax ≥95% of age-predicted HRmax by 99%, RPEmax ≥19 by 100%, and BLmax ≥8 mmol·L−1 by 100% of participants, respectively. Regarding the intraday variations, latter cutoffs were not reached in two cases for RERmax and in one case for HRmax and BLmax. Intraclass correlations for the day-to-day variability were r = 0.823 for RERmax, r = 0.828 for HRmax, and r = 0.380 for BLmax, respectively.

Conclusions The proposed high cut-off values for secondary criteria provide some assurance that V˙O2max may have been achieved in athletes without increasing type II errors. However, type I errors may still occur indicating that further methods such as V˙O2-plateau or V˙O2-validation may be required.

1Department of Sport, Exercise and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, SWITZERLAND;

2Department Medicine, Training and Health, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, GERMANY;

3Centre for Chronobiology, Psychiatric Hospital of the University of Basel, Basel, SWITZERLAND; and

4Transfaculty Research Platform Molecular and Cognitive Neurosciences, University of Basel, Basel, SWITZERLAND

Address for correspondence: Raphael Knaier, Ph.D., Departement für Sport, Bewegung und Gesundheit, Universität Basel, Birsstrasse 320B, 4052 Basel, Switzerland; E-mail: raphael.knaier@unibas.ch.

Submitted for publication August 2018.

Accepted for publication December 2018.

© 2019 American College of Sports Medicine