Journal Logo

A-46 Free Communication/Poster - Injury, Injury Prevention, Recovery, and Rehabilitation Wednesday, May 27, 2020, 9: 30 AM - 12: 00 PM Room: CC-Exhibit Hall

Impaired Ankle Proprioception In Individuals With Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain

364 Board #180 May 27 10:30 AM - 12:00 PM

XU, Xinyi1; Tong, Yujie1; Tian, Xiaochun1; Waddington, Gordon2; Adams, Roger2; Witchalls, Jeremy3; El-ansary, Doal4; Pranata, Adrian4; Lin, Jianhua5; Chen, Peijie1; Han, Jia1

Author Information
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise: July 2020 - Volume 52 - Issue 7S - p 88
doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000670996.89069.c6
  • Free

PURPOSE: Ankle proprioception plays a crucial role in balance control. Previous research indicates that individuals with chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNLBP) rely more on ankle than lumbar proprioception in maintaining balance compared to controls. This study aimed to explore if individuals with CNLBP demonstrated any difference in ankle proprioception compared to healthy controls.

METHODS: Twenty-six participants with no ankle injuries in the last 3 months volunteered in this case-control study. Thirteen CNLBP participants(9 Females, age 29.3±9.6yrs old) and 13 were healthy controls (6 Female, age 25.8±8.2yrs old). The Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire(OMPQ) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were administered for the CNLBP group. Left and right ankle proprioception was assessed by using the Active Movement Extent Discrimination Apparatus (AMEDA) in standing. To assess ankle proprioception, participants were required to actively invert their ankles to a physical stop and to discriminate between 4 possible ankle inversion angles(10°, 12°, 14° and 16°). The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was generated and the mean Area under the ROC Curve (AUC) was calculated to give each participant an ankle proprioceptive acuity score.

RESULTS: The mean proprioceptive discrimination AUC scores for CNLBP and healthy controls were 0.756±0.361 and 0.793±0.04. CNLBP participants demonstrated significantly worse proprioception than healthy controls (p=0.02, 95%CI= [61.70%-89.4] %). In healthy controls, there is significant and strong correlation between left and right ankle proprioception (r=0.747, p=0.003), but not significant in the CNLBP group (r=0.139, p=0.650).

CONCLUSION: The findings of the present study confirm that the ankle proprioception is impaired in individuals with CNLBP. In addition, a common motor program may be used to bilateral ankle movement control in healthy people that demonstrate impairment in people with CNLBP. These findings provide a possible explanation for impaired balance in individuals with CNLBP and may have implications for physiotherapy intervention.

Copyright © 2020 by the American College of Sports Medicine