Journal Logo

EPIDEMIOLOGY

Cardiorespiratory Fitness, Waist Circumference, and Alanine Aminotransferase in Youth

TRILK, JENNIFER L.1; ORTAGLIA, ANDREW2; BLAIR, STEVEN N.2; BOTTAI, MATTEO3; CHURCH, TIMOTHY S.4; PATE, RUSSELL R.2

Author Information
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise: April 2013 - Volume 45 - Issue 4 - p 722-727
doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31827aa875
  • Free

Abstract

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a significant public health issue in youth, because NAFLD can lead to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, both of which increase mortality risk in adults (29). In addition, NAFLD is considered the liver component of the metabolic syndrome (24,31) and is strongly associated with type 2 diabetes and multiple cardiovascular risk factors in overweight and obese youth and adults (39). Therefore, prevention and treatment of pediatric NAFLD are significant public health aims.

The European Youth Heart Study demonstrated that cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is inversely correlated to the metabolic syndrome (33). In a smaller study in youth, Wittmeier et al. (39) demonstrated that CRF also is inversely associated with magnetic resonance spectroscopy–assessed hepatic triglyceride content, independent of total body and visceral fat mass (39). However, other studies in youth and adults have found that body fat mediates these associations (9,32). Because CRF also is inversely associated with lower body weight and central adiposity (15), changes in CRF may directly and/or indirectly affect NAFLD with or without changes in body fat.

The gold standard for diagnosis of NAFLD is via liver biopsy, but because this diagnostic sometimes is not feasible, ultrasound and magnetic resonance spectroscopy also have been used. However, all of these diagnostic methods are impractical in large-scale studies because of cost and subject burden. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), the enzyme most closely related to liver fat accumulation (38) and a blood biomarker for NAFLD (3,19), is easily available and low cost, making it the most widely used surrogate marker for NAFLD in epidemiologic studies (13). Associations between CRF and ALT have been examined in adults (9); however, only two smaller studies have examined these associations in 12-yr-old youth who were obese (N = 241) (3) or in 12- to 18-yr-old youth (N = 95) who were categorized into normal weight/obese subgroups with/without the metabolic syndrome (19). To our knowledge, no study has examined the association of CRF, waist circumference (WC), and ALT in a large sample of youth of different CRF, age, race, sex, and WC.

The purpose of this study was to comprehensively examine associations between CRF, WC, and ALT in a nationally representative sample of US youth.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present study used data obtained from the 2001–2002 and 2003–2004 US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). NHANES is a complex, multistage probability design that is weighted to represent the US Census civilian noninstitutionalized population (e.g., a method to measure the number of people in the population represented by that sample person); it combines household interviews with standardized physical examinations and blood testing and is designed to assess the health and nutritional status of the US population (13).

NHANES obtains written informed consent from all participants who undergo in-home interviews and health examinations. Ambulatory children age 12–19 yr at the time of the examination who had complete data for demographic and anthropometric characteristics, CRF, and comprehensive blood biomarkers related to NAFLD were assessed. Adolescents who tested positive for hepatitis B and C and autoimmune hepatitis and girls who were pregnant or may be pregnant were excluded. A total of 4272 male and female adolescents completed examination procedures. Of those, n = 4233 were negative for hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis B core antibody, and hepatitis C antibody; n = 4020 had complete data for ALT values, n = 3572 had WC measures, and n = 2844 had complete data for estimated V˙O2max. Therefore, analyses were performed on n = 2844 youth. The University of South Carolina’s Institutional Review Board approved of the data analysis from NHANES.

Medical examination and questionnaires.

The medical examination/questionnaire protocol in NHANES is explained in Survey Operations Manuals, Brochures, Consent Documents for 2003–2004 (6) (pp. 3–20 to 3–29). Briefly, standing height, weight, and WC were measured by a physician during the medical examination, and children 12 yr and older were asked to provide a blood sample for blood chemistry analysis. ALT was analyzed using an enzymatic rate method. Tests for hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis B core antibody, and hepatitis C antibody were performed in duplicate using a standard procedure described in NHANES laboratory protocols (7,8).

CRF.

The protocol to assess CRF in NHANES is explained in the cardiovascular fitness procedures manual (27), (pp. 1–42). Briefly, a trained health or medical technician administered one of eight submaximal treadmill tests dependent upon age, body mass index (BMI), and self-reported level of physical activity. Each protocol included a 2-min warm-up, two 3-min exercise stages, and a 2-min cool down period. The protocol goal was to elicit a heart rate that was approximately 75% of the age-predicted maximum (220−age) by the end of the test. Heart rate was monitored throughout the test, and blood pressure was measured at the end of each stage. Rate of perceived exertion was obtained from the participants using the Borg scale. Maximal oxygen uptake (V˙O2max) was estimated using a calculation that extrapolated the measured heart rate responses to known levels of exercise workloads, assuming the relation between heart rate and oxygen consumption is linear during exercise (27). Estimated V˙O2max (mL·kg−1·min−1) was then categorized based on the sex-specific FITNESSGRAM® CRF categories for youth and young adults 12–19 yr (10). FITNESSGRAM® is a criterion-referenced standard for youth that is used to link CRF to health outcomes. “Low” level of (cardiorespiratory) CV fitness is defined as an estimated V˙O2max below the 20th percentile of the Aerobics Center Longitudinal Study data of the same sex and age group; “moderate” fitness is defined as a value between the 20th and 59th percentile, and “high” fitness is defined as at or above the 60th percentile (27).

Statistical analyses.

Logistic regression was used to examine youth’s level of CRF and WC with the odds of having an elevated ALT, whereas quantile regression was used to examine the youth’s level of CRF and WC across ALT percentiles to obtain a more complete description of the associations (particularly at the tails of the ALT distribution). Because V˙O2max was estimated and because the assumption of linearity cannot be made between V˙O2max and ALT, categorical CRF was used based on the criteria used in the youth FITNESSGRAM® program. Categories of “low, moderate, and high” CRF were dichotomized into “low” and “adequate” CRF, with adequate CRF used as the reference (27). This categorization was performed because youth age 12–19 yr in the “low” category failed to meet the levels of CRF deemed appropriate by experts for health.

For logistic regression, each observation for ALT was dichotomized and the odds of observing ALT >30 U·L−1 were modeled using SURVEYLOGISTIC in SAS® 9.2 (SAS, Cary, NC). Although some investigators have used a cutoff point of 40 U·L−1 for adult men, others have used a cutoff of 30 U·L−1 (11,30,34,35,37). A cutoff of ALT >30 U·L−1 was used in this study of adolescent boys and girls because Fraser et al. (13) found that a cutoff of 30 U·L−1 was significantly associated with WC and insulin resistance in a nationally representative sample of youth (NHANES 1999–2004). In addition, Strauss et al. (36) used the cutoff of 30 U·L−1 that was consistent of the 97th percentile for youth in NHANES III. Finally, new cut-points to define healthy ranges for serum ALT are suggested to be lower for men and women (12,23). A preliminary analysis was conducted to assess possible interactions between activity level and sex. No statistical significance was found; therefore, logistic regression for ALT >30 U·L−1 was performed on the pooled sexes. In addition, because some have argued for a lower cut-point of 19 U·L−1 for women (22,30), a separate logistic regression was performed on girls only, with an ALT >19 U·L−1 used as the threshold for elevated ALT. Variables with previously reported associations with ALT (age, race, sex, and WC) were a priori included in the models. The statistical significance was set at 0.05.

Quantile regression was used to assess the associations of CRF and WC across adjusted ALT percentiles. The survey package in the statistical software “R,” version 2.12.2, was extended to accommodate quantile regression and used to account for the complex NHANES survey design (25), because the QUANTREG procedure in SAS is not appropriate for survey data. Variables with previously reported associations with ALT (age, race, sex, and WC) were a priori included in the models. For the independent categorical variable, the regression coefficients represent the difference between the adjusted percentiles of the outcome variable between groups. For percentiles from 10th to 90th, a 95% confidence interval was calculated and interpreted. To assess the need for stratifying by sex, a separate analysis was performed to examine the interaction between activity level and sex. No significant interaction was detected. As a result, the main effects model adjusted for sex described above was used.

RESULTS

Demographic and anthropometric characteristics of the 2844 youth were weighted to account for the complex survey design and are displayed in Table 1. The majority of youth (93%) had a normal ALT (≤30 U·L−1). Mean (SE) of ALT was 18.8 (0.2) U·L−1 with a median (SE) of 16.0 (0.1) U·L−1. Of the total weighted sample, 7% had an ALT >30 U·L−1. Of the girls studied, 17% had ALT >19 U·L−1. Sixty-two percent of youth met the FITNESSGRAM® standards for CRF, whereas 38% failed to meet the levels of CRF deemed appropriate by experts for health (Table 1). Significant differences were observed between boys and girls for age, ALT, other liver enzymes (aspartate aminotransferase and γ-glutamyltransferase), estimated V˙O2max, and WC (P < 0.05).

T1-15
TABLE 1:
Participant characteristics, demographics, and CRF (N = 2844, weighted total sample N = 20,054,593).

Table 2 displays the results of the regression coefficients for the logistic and quantile regression models that examined the associations between the independent variables (CRF and WC) and the dependent adjusted ALT variable. The results from the logistic regression suggest that youth with low CRF had 1.5 times the odds of having ALT >30 as compared with youth with adequate CRF; however, it was not statistically significant (P = 0.09). Similarly, the results of the quantile regression suggest that youth with low CRF tend to have higher ALT values, as compared with those with adequate CRF, with the magnitude of the effect increasing as the percentiles increase (Fig. 1) and becoming significant at the 80th, 85th, and 90th percentiles of ALT (+1.04, +1.05, and +2.57 U·L−1, respectively). Finally, for girls only, the odds of having an ALT >19 U·L−1 are significantly increased (adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 1.6, P = 0.03) for girls with low CRF as compared with girls with adequate CRF.

T2-15
TABLE 2:
OR (with P values) in the multivariable models of logistic regression (ALT30 and ALT19; N = 2844, weighted total sample N = 20,054,593).
F1-15
FIGURE 1:
Quantile regression coefficients (with 95% confidence interval) for the association of CRF across adjusted ALT percentiles. Percentile difference adjusted for age, race, and WC. The gray area corresponds to the 95% confidence interval. CRF: dichotomous variable, reference category was youth with adequate CRF.

A positive association was found between WC and the adjusted ALT for both models. The logistic regression model suggests that youth are 1.06 times as likely to have ALT >30 for each 1-cm increase in WC (P < 0.001 from Table 2). Similarly, girls are 1.05 times as likely to have ALT >19 for each 1-cm increase in WC (P < 0.001 from Table 2). The quantile regression model also indicated a strong positive significant association for WC in youth across the entire distribution of adjusted ALT percentiles, with the strength of the association increasing as percentiles increased (Fig. 2).

F2-15
FIGURE 2:
Quantile regression coefficients (with 95% confidence interval) for the association of WC across adjusted ALT percentiles. Percentile difference adjusted for age, race, and CRF. The gray area corresponds to the 95% confidence interval.

DISCUSSION

This is the first study to examine associations between CRF, WC, and ALT in a large nationally representative sample of US youth. Positive associations between youth with low CRF, WC, and an ALT were observed in both models. These results suggest that low CRF may be a risk factor for pediatric NAFLD independent of age, race, and central adiposity, particularly at the upper tail of the ALT distribution. WC seems to be a stronger risk factor for pediatric NAFLD, as indicated by the increasing magnitude of association with increasing ALT percentiles.

Very little information comparing CRF and ALT is available in youth. Of the existing studies, the associations seem consistent with the current findings. In 12-yr-olds, Bougle et al. (3) found a significant inverse association between laboratory-measured V˙O2max and ALT in overweight girls (n = 135, P = 0.012) and a nonsignificant trend in overweight boys (n = 106, P = 0.065). Kelishadi et al. (19) observed that CRF had the highest inverse correlation with ALT in 12- to 18-yr olds (N = 95) regardless if they were of normal weight or overweight, were metabolically normal, or had metabolic disorder. In adults, Church et al. (9) found significant inverse associations between CRF and ALT; however, the association was attenuated after adjusting for WC. In adults with differing severity of the disease, Krasnoff et al. (21) found that all patients demonstrated below average age-predicted CRF as assessed by V˙O2peak. The current study adds to the literature that CRF plays an important role in NAFLD in addition to other chronic diseases.

Beginning at the 50th percentile of ALT, a positive (nonsignificant) association was observed between youth who had low CRF and ALT, with the association becoming significant at the 80th percentile of ALT. Because ALT levels are relatively healthy in stable individuals, it is reasonable to conclude that CRF may not affect ALT levels within normal limits. However, youth above the 50th percentile may particularly benefit from higher intensity physical activity and/or exercise training to improve CRF and subsequently prevent incidence of NAFLD. Johnson et al. (18) observed that 4 wk of aerobic exercise training increased V˙O2max by 13% and decreased hepatic triglyceride concentration by 21% independent of changes in body weight. Improvements in muscle quality and CRF include improved muscle mitochondrial quality, number and function, increased muscle capillarization and blood flow, increased muscle postreceptor insulin signaling, glucose uptake, and subsequently, enhanced insulin sensitivity (4). These cardiometabolic improvements can increase muscle fatty acid metabolism and decrease circulating triglycerides and subsequent liver triglyceride accumulation. Given that NAFLD is now identified as the liver component of the metabolic syndrome, these mechanistic adaptations demonstrate the importance of higher intensity physical activity or exercise training and subsequent improvement of CRF for the prevention or management of the metabolic syndrome and NAFLD.

A strong positive association between WC and ALT was found in both models. Some studies demonstrate a strong correlation between obesity/WC and NAFLD (2,13,28), and interventions that prioritized weight loss have found decreases in liver fat and ALT (16,17). However, rapid weight loss (e.g., from severe caloric restriction or gastric surgery) is contraindicated, because it has been shown to increase inflammation and promote steatohepatitis (1,26). In addition, lifestyle weight loss interventions usually observe modest and often not sustained body weight change, with many individuals returning to baseline weight after 1–3 yr (12). However, improving CRF through increasing physical activity may decrease NAFLD and improve other cardiometabolic factors independent of weight loss (18). Indeed, regardless of body fatness, individuals who have high CRF have been shown to have lower cardiovascular and metabolic risk than individuals of the same body fatness who are less fit (23). In addition to the mechanisms mentioned above, exercise training improvements in NAFLD can be independent of a weight loss intervention by increasing muscle fatty acid metabolism, which cannot be achieved through energy restriction (14).

Assessing associations in health sciences is commonly performed using logistic regression (for categorical outcome variables) or linear regression (for continuous outcome variables); however, performing analyses on the mean of the outcome variable may overlook associations at the tails of the distribution, such as with elevated ALT levels. In addition, in cases in which the distribution of ALT is skewed (13), the median is a better measure of central tendency as compared with the mean. Traditionally used in econometrics, quantile regression (20) was used in this study because by modeling many ALT percentiles, it allowed the investigators to differentiate associations across the entire adjusted ALT distribution, which provided a comprehensive description of the association between CRF, WC, and ALT. These properties, along with the freedom from any distributional assumptions, made quantile regression an attractive method for assessing CRF and WC in youth across percentiles of ALT.

Strengths of the study include using a nationally representative sample of adolescents to assess associations, using an objectively measured laboratory measurement of CRF, and assessing WC instead of BMI to estimate body fatness and, in particular, central obesity. Also, use of quantile regression provided a more detailed description of the associations between CRF, WC, and ALT. One limitation to this study was using a proxy measure (ALT) to assess NAFLD. ALT is the most closely related enzyme to liver fat accumulation (38). However, Burgert et al. (5) questioned the sensitivity and specificity of ALT as a diagnostic tool for pediatric NAFLD, because they found that one half of their patients with normal ALT had a magnetic resonance imaging–assessed hepatic fat fraction >5.5%, the cutoff for NAFLD diagnosis. In addition, neither ALT nor another biomarker can predict the degree of the disease or progression to cirrhosis. Therefore, a direct link between elevated ALT and NAFLD diagnosis should be made with caution. Another limitation was not excluding for possible alcohol consumption. However, when examining prevalence of elevated ALT in the same cohort of >adolescents (NHANES 2003–2006), Fraser et al. (13) found no statistical difference in results when analyses were limited to 12- to 15-yr-olds. Finally, this study was cross-sectional, and therefore, causality cannot be assumed.

In conclusion, clinically meaningful inverse associations between CRF and ALT were found in NHANES youth, particularly in youth above the 80th percentile for ALT. A strong positive association was found between WC and ALT. Future studies should examine whether interventions to improve CRF in NAFLD youth can decrease hepatic fat and liver enzyme concentrations. In addition, using quantile regression allows for a comprehensive analysis of associations regarding CRF and health epidemiology and therefore is warranted.

This work was supported by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development at the National Institutes of Health (grant number F32HD066924).

The authors thank Gaye Groover Christmus for the technical editing of this manuscript.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

The results of the present study do not constitute endorsement by the American College of Sports Medicine.

REFERENCES

1. Andersen T, Gluud C, Franzmann MB, Christoffersen P. Hepatic effects of dietary weight loss in morbidly obese subjects. J Hepatol. 1991; 12 (2): 224–9.
2. Angulo P. Obesity and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Nutr Rev. 2007; 65 (6 Pt 2): S57–3.
3. Bougle D, Zunquin G, Sesboue B, Sabatier JP. Relationships of cardiorespiratory fitness with metabolic risk factors, inflammation, and liver transaminases in overweight youths. Int J Pediatr. 2010. Available from: http://http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijped/2010/580897/cta/. doi:10.1155/2010/580897.
4. Boule NG, Haddad E, Kenny GP, Wells GA, Sigal RJ. Effects of exercise on glycemic control and body mass in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. JAMA. 2001; 286 (10): 1218–27.
5. Burgert TS, Taksali SE, Dziura J, et al.. Alanine aminotransferase levels and fatty liver in childhood obesity: associations with insulin resistance, adiponectin, and visceral fat. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006; 91 (11): 4287–94.
6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. NHANES Survey Operations Manuals, Brochures, Consent Documents for 2003–2004 2004 [cited 2011 Nov 2]. Available from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/nhanes2003–2004/current_nhanes_03_04.htm.
7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. National Health and Nutrition Examination Laboratory Protocols 2001–2002 2001 [cited 2011 Nov 7]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/nhanes2003-2004/lab03_04.htm.
8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. National Health and Nutrition Examination Laboratory Protocols 2003 [cited 2011 Nov 7]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhanes/nhanes_03_04/l40_c_met_alanine_amino_transferase.pdf.
9. Church TS, Kuk JL, Ross R, Priest EL, Biltoft E, Blair SN. Association of cardiorespiratory fitness, body mass index, and waist circumference to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2006; 130 (7): 2023–30.
10. Cureton KJ, Warren GL. Criterion-referenced standards for youth health-related fitness tests: a tutorial. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1990; 61 (1): 7–19.
11. Dunn W, Xu R, Wingard DL, et al.. Suspected nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and mortality risk in a population-based cohort study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008; 103 (9): 2263–71.
12. Franz MJ, VanWormer JJ, Crain AL, et al.. Weight-loss outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of weight-loss clinical trials with a minimum 1-year follow-up. J Am Diet Assoc. 2007; 107 (10): 1755–67.
13. Fraser A, Longnecker MP, Lawlor DA. Prevalence of elevated alanine aminotransferase among US adolescents and associated factors: NHANES 1999–2004. Gastroenterology. 2007; 133 (6): 1814–20.
14. Goodpaster BH, Katsiaras A, Kelley DE. Enhanced fat oxidation through physical activity is associated with improvements in insulin sensitivity in obesity. Diabetes. 2003; 52 (9): 2191–7.
15. Gutin B, Yin Z, Humphries MC, et al.. Relations of body fatness and cardiovascular fitness to lipid profile in black and white adolescents. Pediatr Res. 2005; 58 (1): 78–82.
16. Hickman IJ, Jonsson JR, Prins JB, et al.. Modest weight loss and physical activity in overweight patients with chronic liver disease results in sustained improvements in alanine aminotransferase, fasting insulin, and quality of life. Gut. 2004; 53 (3): 413–9.
17. Huang MA, Greenson JK, Chao C, et al.. One-year intense nutritional counseling results in histological improvement in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: a pilot study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005; 100 (5): 1072–81.
18. Johnson NA, Sachinwalla T, Walton DW, et al.. Aerobic exercise training reduces hepatic and visceral lipids in obese individuals without weight loss. Hepatology. 2009; 50 (4): 1105–12.
19. Kelishadi R, Cook SR, Amra B, Adibi A. Factors associated with insulin resistance and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease among youths. Atherosclerosis. 2009; 204 (2): 538–43.
20. Koenker R, Hallock K. Quantile regression. J Econ Perspect. 2001; 15: 143–56.
21. Krasnoff JB, Painter PL, Wallace JP, Bass NM, Merriman RB. Health-related fitness and physical activity in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2008; 47 (4): 1158–66.
22. Kunde SS, Lazenby AJ, Clements RH, Abrams GA. Spectrum of NAFLD and diagnostic implications of the proposed new normal range for serum ALT in obese women. Hepatology. 2005; 42 (3): 650–6.
23. Lee S, Kuk JL, Katzmarzyk PT, Blair SN, Church TS, Ross R. Cardiorespiratory fitness attenuates metabolic risk independent of abdominal subcutaneous and visceral fat in men. Diabetes Care. 2005; 28 (4): 895–901.
24. Love-Osborne KA, Nadeau KJ, Sheeder J, Fenton LZ, Zeitler P. Presence of the metabolic syndrome in obese adolescents predicts impaired glucose tolerance and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Adolesc Health. 2008; 42 (6): 543–8.
25. Lumley T. Complex Surveys: A Guide to Analysis Using R. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley; 2010. pp. 1–46.
26. Luyckx FH, Desaive C, Thiry A, et al.. Liver abnormalities in severely obese subjects: effect of drastic weight loss after gastroplasty. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1998; 22 (3): 222–6.
27. National Center for Health Statistics. The NHANES Cardiovascular Fitness Procedure Manual 2004 [cited 2012 Mar 1]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhanes/nhanes_03_04/cv_99-04.pdf.
28. Ong JP, Elariny H, Collantes R, et al.. Predictors of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and advanced fibrosis in morbidly obese patients. Obes Surg. 2005; 15 (3): 310–5.
29. Ong JP, Pitts A, Younossi ZM. Increased overall mortality and liver-related mortality in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol. 2008; 49 (4): 608–12.
30. Prati D, Taioli E, Zanella A, et al.. Updated definitions of healthy ranges for serum alanine aminotransferase levels. Ann Intern Med. 2002; 137 (1): 1–10.
31. Rector RS, Thyfault JP, Wei Y, Ibdah JA. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and the metabolic syndrome: an update. World J Gastroenterol. 2008; 14 (2): 185–92.
32. Rizzo NS, Ruiz JR, Hurtig-Wennlof A, Ortega FB, Sjostrom M. Relationship of physical activity, fitness, and fatness with clustered metabolic risk in children and adolescents: the European youth heart study. J Pediatr. 2007; 150 (4): 388–94.
33. Ruiz JR, Ortega FB, Rizzo NS, et al.. High cardiovascular fitness is associated with low metabolic risk score in children: The European Youth Heart Study. Pediatr Res. 2007; 61 (3): 350–5.
34. Schwimmer JB, Deutsch R, Kahen T, Lavine JE, Stanley C, Behling C. Prevalence of fatty liver in children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2006; 118 (4): 1388–93.
35. Schwimmer JB, Pardee PE, Lavine JE, Blumkin AK, Cook S. Cardiovascular risk factors and the metabolic syndrome in pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Circulation. 2008; 118 (3): 277–83.
36. Strauss RS, Barlow SE, Dietz WH. Prevalence of abnormal serum aminotransferase values in overweight and obese adolescents. J Pediatr. 2000; 136 (6): 727–33.
37. Tazawa Y, Noguchi H, Nishinomiya F, Takada G. Serum alanine aminotransferase activity in obese children. Acta Paediatr. 1997; 86 (3): 238–41.
38. Westerbacka J, Corner A, Tiikkainen M, et al.. Women and men have similar amounts of liver and intra-abdominal fat, despite more subcutaneous fat in women: implications for sex differences in markers of cardiovascular risk. Diabetologia. 2004; 47 (8): 1360–9.
39. Wittmeier KD, Wicklow BA, Macintosh AC, et al.. Hepatic steatosis and low cardiorespiratory fitness in youth with type 2 diabetes. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2012; 20 (5): 1034–40.
Keywords:

ADOLESCENTS; EXERCISE; METABOLIC SYNDROME X; NONALCOHOLIC FATTY LIVER DISEASE

©2013The American College of Sports Medicine