Secondary Logo


Seifert, J G; Burke, E R (FACSM)*; Bacharach, D W (FACSM)

Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise: May 1999 - Volume 31 - Issue 5 - p S281
Annual Meeting Abstracts

Human Performance Lab, SCSU, St. Cloud, MN 56301. *Dept of Biology, UCCS, Colorado Springs, CO.

(sponsor: D Bacharach, FACSM)

    Abstract 1381

    The purpose of this field study was to compare the physiological responses of riding a tandem bicycle (TB) to riding a single bicycle (SB). Nine pairs of experienced, recreational tandem cyclists rode a TB or their SB in a random order, crossover design. Cyclists rode for 5 min at each velocity of 19, 23, 26, 29 kph (12, 14, 16, 18 mph) on a flat, paved surface. Environmental conditions were similar between trials. Heart rate (HR), RPE, and lactic acid (LA) were collected after each interval. Results: Statistical analyses revealed that riding a TB resulted in statistically lower HR, RPE, and LA mean values than when riding a SB. Mean (± SD) HR, RPE, and LA for TB and SB were 126 (20.7) bpm, 10.1 (1.7), and 1.46 (1.0) mM/l vs. 142 (20.1) bpm, 11.3 (2.6), and 2.36 (1.7) mM/l, respectively. No statistical differences were observed between the captain (front position) and the stoker (rear position) when both were cycling together on a TB. When cycling separately on a SB, however, captains exhibited statistically lower HR, RPE, and LA values compared to stokers. Conclusions: 1) At the same velocities, cycling on a TB results in lower energy expenditure patterns than on a SB, 2) at similar energy expenditures, cyclists were able to ride from 3 to 4 mph faster on a TB than on a SB, and 3) even though a tandem pair may be mismatched physically, as observed by SB results, each rider can still attain the benefits of exercise when cycling as a pair on a TB.

    Burley Design Cooperative funded this study.

    Section Description

    American College of Sports Medicine; 46th Annual Meeting; Washington State; Convention & Trade Center; June 2-5, 1999

    The abstracts contained herein were prepared by the authors and then printed by photo-offset without correction. The accuracy, form of citation, designation, nomenclature, and the like, all remain the responsibility of the author. Readers should note that the appearance of an abstract does not imply future publication of a regular scientific manuscript.


    © 1999 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.