Share this article on:

Influence of Competition on Performance and Pacing during Cycling Exercise


Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise: March 2012 - Volume 44 - Issue 3 - p 509–515
doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31823378b1
Applied Sciences

Purpose The study’s purpose was to examine the influence of head-to-head (HH) competition on performance, pacing strategy, and bioenergetics during a 2000-m cycling task.

Methods Fourteen participants completed three 2000-m familiarization time trials (TTs) on a Velotron cycle ergometer, before completing an additional TT and a 2000-m simulated HH competition in a counterbalanced order. During the trials, a computer-generated image of the participants completing the 2000-m course was projected onto a screen positioned in front of the participants. Although participants believed they were competing against another individual during the HH competition, they were in fact competing against their best familiarization performance (FAM), replayed on the screen by the Velotron software.

Results Performance was significantly faster in HH than in FAM or TT (184.6 ± 6.2, 187.7 ± 8.2, and 188.3 ± 9.5 s, respectively). Pacing profile in HH initially matched the FAM performance but was better maintained from 1000 m until the end of exercise. The higher power output during the latter part of the test was achieved by a greater anaerobic energy contribution, whereas the aerobic energy yield remained unchanged.

Conclusions HH competition encourages participants to increase their performance. This occurs primarily via an increased anaerobic energy yield, which seems to be centrally mediated, and is consistent with the concept of a physiologic reserve.

1University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UNITED KINGDOM; and 2Deutsche Sporthochschule (German Sport University), Cologne, GERMANY

Address for correspondence: Jo Corbett, Ph.D., Department of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Portsmouth, Spinnaker Building, Cambridge Road, Portsmouth PO1 2ER, United Kingdom; E-mail:

Submitted for publication May 2011.

Accepted for publication August 2011.

©2012The American College of Sports Medicine