Secondary Logo

Journal Logo



Kravitz, Len R. Ph.D., CSCS

Author Information
ACSM's Health & Fitness Journal: 1/2 2019 - Volume 23 - Issue 1 - p 9-15
doi: 10.1249/FIT.0000000000000450
  • Free


We are a species made to move. Physical activity is a part of our daily lives. Looking retrospectively, Harvard evolutionary biologist Dr. Daniel Lieberman (1) states humans have evolved and adapted for a wide range of diverse physical activities, such as long-distance running and walking in the heat, carrying, digging, and throwing objects. Yet we now face a unique challenge as fitness professionals and educators. The urbanization and industrial shifts in Western society, along with our remarkable technological advances, have helped to create chair-based environments where we sit for the greater part of our waking day (2). Excessive sitting lifestyles have inspired a new science of sedentary behavior to better understand the deleterious effects and to develop strategies to thwart the perils of “sitting disease” (2). However, we currently have the most compelling of research studies that denote regular participation in aerobic exercise and resistance training is health promoting and successful in disease management and prevention for people of all ages. What’s more, in a recent 2018 systematic review and meta-analysis (a statistical approach to combine the results from multiple studies) that analyzed data from 2 million women and men, the researchers concluded, “Higher levels of upper- and lower-body muscular strength are associated with a lower risk of mortality in adult populations, regardless of age and follow-up period” (3). In addition, youth exercise programs that enhance muscular strength and fundamental movement skill performance early in life will build the foundation for an active lifestyle later in life (4). Therefore, the aim of this paper is twofold: 1) to substantiate the evidence-based health benefits of resistance training and 2) to provide a structure and basis for developing a lifelong resistance training program.

Humans have evolved and adapted for a wide range of unique physical activities, such as long-distance running and walking in the heat, carrying, digging, and throwing objects.


Resistance training is a method of conditioning where individuals work against a broad range of resistive loads (e.g., body weight, weight machines, free weights, elastic bands, and medicine balls) to enhance fitness level, health, and/or sports performance (4). In a very well-documented review (5), Dr. Wayne L. Westcott, who directs exercise programs and the fitness research at Quincy College, has summarized the fact-based health benefits of resistance training. Westcott submits solid evidence that shows regular, progressively challenging resistance training can improve bone density, percent body fat, resting metabolism, muscle mass, glycemic control, blood pressure, blood lipids, physical function, and mental health. Relatedly, Borde et al. (6) report that recent studies support an emerging hypothesis that lifelong resistance training may be an important nonpharmaceutical intervention to slow and even counteract the age-related loss of neuromuscular function. Furthermore, resistance training is particularly important in the fifth and sixth decade of life to control and help reverse the age-associated losses of muscle size (7). Three vital benefits of resistance training that warrant further discussion in this paper are the improvements in bone density, body fat, and glycemic control.

The increase and/or preservation of bone mass is paramount, particularly to women as they age. Women are at higher risk because their bone loss quickens after the onset of menopause. During menopause, the loss of bone mass may lead to osteoporosis. According to the World Health Organization (8), the lifetime risk for osteoporotic fractures in women is at least 30%, and possibly closer to 40%. In men, the risk is only 13% (8). In their systematic review, Gómez-Cabello et al. (9), researchers from universities in Spain, state that resistance training is a powerful stimulus to maintain and improve bone mass during the ageing process.

In his research review, Westcott (5) cites several studies that show resistance training programs lead to a decrease in fat weight and an increase in muscle mass. In another review, Strasser and Schobersberger (10), from the Institute for Sports Medicine in Tirol, Austria, highlight that resistance training programs have been shown to be effective in reducing visceral fat. Visceral fat obesity is highly associated with the development of hypertension, high blood lipids, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease (10). The researchers draw attention to studies that show muscle mass is inversely associated with all-cause (i.e., harmful diseases) mortality and the prevalence of metabolic syndrome. Thus, an important case is made, and perhaps needs more attention in the consumer media, for the evidence relating to the positive impact of resistance training in reducing major cardiovascular disease risk factors.

In regard to the effects of resistance training to improve glycemic control, the American Diabetes Association (ADA) Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes — 2018 reports that there is supportive evidence from well-conducted cohort studies that persons with diabetes should engage in resistance exercise 2 to 3 times per week on nonconsecutive days (11). In addition, the ADA report highlights that higher levels of exercise intensity are associated with greater improvements in A1c (i.e., A1c or HbA1c is the form of hemoglobin measured to identify the 3-month average of blood glucose concentration). Ishiguro et al. (12), from the Department of Hematology, Endocrinology, and Metabolism from Niigata University in Japan, provide other useful suggestions from their systematic review and meta-analysis. Their research revealed that there is a much better outcome with A1c reduction in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients when patients did resistance training programs consisting of 21 or more sets per session of training. For example, in a program of 7 different upper- and lower-body exercises, 3 sets of 7 exercises would be 21 total sets. In another major finding from the review, the researchers indicate that resistance training has a better glycemic control effect when it is introduced in people who have had type 2 diabetes for 6 years or less. A third important finding of this research reveals that resistance training has a more pronounced effect in persons whose body mass index (BMI) is from 22.3 to 38.8 kg/m2, which are BMI classifications of normal to obese, respectively.

Higher levels of exercise intensity are associated with greater improvements in A1c.

The findings discussed in the previous paragraphs present impressive evidence why resistance training is vital for overall health. In the next sections, a plan for a lifelong resistance training program is discussed for youth and adults.


The term “youth” is a broadly defined term that encompasses children and adolescents (13). Children, also defined as preadolescents, refers to girls (up to age 11) and boys (up to age 13) who have not developed secondary sex characteristics. Adolescence depicts a period of time between childhood and adulthood. For instance, adolescence for girls is approximately between 12 and 18 years and for boys it is between 14 and 18 years (13).

There is now worldwide acceptance by scientists that resistance training in youth will lead to significant improvements of muscular strength, muscular endurance, power production, running velocity, change-of-direction speed, and motor skills and functional performance if the training is under the supervision and guidance of a qualified fitness instructor (4,13,14). In addition, resistance training in children has been shown to helpfully alter body composition, reduce fat, and improve insulin sensitivity in adolescents who are overweight (4). Interestingly, data now show that youth with low muscular fitness are at increased risk of maintaining a low muscular fitness level into adulthood (15). Supportively, in boys and girls, resistance training also may lead to a positive attitude by increasing self-esteem and confidence levels. However, for all of these convincing results to be realized and achieved for participation in resistance training, Lloyd et al. (4) state that for children to succeed, they must be able to demonstrate that they are emotionally mature enough to follow directions.

Importantly, data now show that youth with low muscular fitness are at increased risk of maintaining a low muscular fitness level into adulthood.

A very popular way to introduce youth to resistance training is with body weight exercises. Initially teaching children pushups (or wall pushups), squats, lunges, pull-ups, dips, bridges, and inverted rows (from a bar or rings) will help them learn more about the muscular control it takes to move the body. As their interest progresses, begin adding exercises with resistance bands, medicine balls, dowel rods, and light dumbbells. All resistance exercises should be performed with appropriate progressions in training using proper technique. For a sustained and hopefully the start of a lifelong resistance training program, develop a program that is challenging and always changing. The updated position paper on youth resistance training from the National Strength and Conditioning Association (14) provides several helpful general resistance training guidelines, which are summarized:

  1. Ensure a safe exercise environment that is free of hazards.
  2. Begin training sessions with a 5- to 10-minute dynamic warm-up.
  3. Start the training with relatively light loads; the focus should be on learning the exercises with proper form and performing the exercises with a moderate velocity. As the youth progresses, incorporating different velocities of movement, such as plyometric exercises, may be introduced.
  4. Develop the resistance program with the goal of attaining symmetrical muscular development with satisfactory muscular strength balance around the movable joints.
  5. Perform 1 to 3 sets of 6 to 15 repetitions 2 to 3 times per week (nonconsecutive days). With power development, 1 to 3 sets of 3 to 6 repetitions can be employed.
  6. A gradual progression (5% to 10% increase) for each participant should be based on his or her ability, needs, and goals.
  7. Always include a cool-down consisting of light-intensity calisthenics and static stretching.

In boys and girls, resistance training also may lead to a positive attitude by increasing self-esteem and confidence levels.

For lifelong maintenance of resistance training, education on healthy lifestyles is encouraged including discussions on hydration and the importance of rest and sleep. Although many youths may choose to start resistance training for purposes of enhancing sport performance, fitness pros should always remind them of the health-related benefits they also are attaining. For the improvement of youth muscular strength, which Borde et al. (6) encourage as a lifelong goal, the National Strength and Conditioning Association recommendations for novice, intermediate, and advanced levels of youth resistance training programs are synthesized in Table 1. Moreover, Table 2 provides movement competencies for implementing youth resistance training programs.

NSCA Recommendations for Progression in Youth Strength Training
Movement Competencies for Youth Resistance Training


As with youth, one of the meaningful keys for adults to succeed with a lifelong, effective resistance training program is to ensure that it is developed and supervised by a qualified professional. Educate participants that a program that gradually progresses will help confirm the many documented health benefits associated with resistance training. Because many adults will be transitioning from a sedentary lifestyle to their first introduction to resistance training, perhaps a circuit weight training (CWT) program would be most appropriate to introduce. Circuit weight training is a sequence of 6 to 12 (or more) resistance exercises performed in a rotational order with light-to-moderate intensity loads (40% to 60% one-repetition maximum) using limited to no rest between exercises (16). This type of training has been implemented in programs involving healthy younger and older adults, as well as in programs involving clinical populations such as people with hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and heart disease. Moreover, CWT programs are time-efficient programs that have been shown to improve muscular strength and endurance, flexibility, body composition, and health-related enhancements such as resting blood pressure, hemoglobin A1c, and aerobic capacity (16). Common exercise selections for CWT, as well as traditional resistance training, include exercises for the chest (e.g., bench press, decline dumbbell bench press), shoulder (e.g., standing dumbbell side lateral, seated shoulder press), upper/middle back (e.g., latissimus dorsi pulldown, seated pulley row, upright row), core (e.g., plank hold, physioball crunch, and physioball back extension), biceps (e.g., standing barbell curl, alternating incline dumbbell curl), triceps (e.g., decline triceps extensions, overhead rope triceps extensions), thigh/hip/gluteals (e.g., leg press, lunges, standing leg curls, leg extensions), and calves (e.g., seated and standing calf raises). Start with one circuit and gradually progress up to four circuits, resting 1 to 3 minutes after the completion of each circuit.

To maximize a lifelong resistance training program for adults, an individualized program design approach is encouraged. In ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription (17), it is suggested that an optimal resistance training program acutely manipulates the following variables: 1) intensity (i.e., loading); 2) volume, which is the number of sets and repetitions; 3) exercises selected; 4) order of the exercises; 5) rest intervals between sets; 6) velocity of contraction; and 7) frequency of exercise.

For a lifelong resistance training program, progressive overload, specificity, and variation of training should be addressed (18). With progressive overload, the key is to advance gradually, increasing the task on the body’s musculoskeletal system. Resistance training is most effective for improving long-term muscular fitness and health when the human body is regularly challenged to exert a force to meet a higher physiological demand (18). Specificity refers to several key training points, including the velocity of the movement, the muscle groups trained, the range of motion of the exercise, the intensity and volume of the training, and the energy system involved with the exercises (18). Dr. William Kraemer et al. (18) underscore that the most successful resistance training programs individualize all of these specificity variables to each person’s fitness level and training goals. For lifelong progression in resistance training, variation, or a systematic alternation of the program, is needed. If a person applies the same stressor on the muscular fitness system of the body, this may result in an undesirable plateau in health benefits because the body has adapted to the same repetitive training stimulus. With resistance training, variation can easily be implemented by regularly changing the exercises, performing the exercises in a different sequence, and performing the movements at different tempos. Table 3 summarizes the resistance training guidelines from ACSM (17), and Table 4 is a generic resistance training program design template that you can individualize for all healthly and clinical populations of boys and girls and men and women.

Resistance Exercise Recommendations for Adults
Template for an Individualized Resistance Training Program Design for All Persons

For lifelong progression in resistance training, variation, or a systematic alternation of the program, is needed.


In a systematic scientific review study, Latham et al. (20) recap that progressive resistance training has been shown to meaningfully and significantly increase strength in older adults. It also has an advantageous effect on improving several functional limitations associated with aging. Importantly, for a higher level of movement function, the researchers recommend that resistance training programs need to be combined with other forms of exercise such as balance training. The researchers suggest that practitioners need to always consider any disabilities and health factors for each client in the design of resistance training programs. Latham et al. encourage clinicians to carefully monitor participants for any adverse effects, particularly those who are frail or have been ill recently. In addition, practitioners also should be aware of the special issues of this population, such as barriers to exercise and self-esteem issues that may be a result of a disability and/or disease.


Exercise that is enjoyable can improve adoption of and adherence to exercise programs. Lieberman (1) submits we need to devise ways to make physical activity more enjoyable in schools, workplaces, and other environments. The dedicated professional practitioners, educators, and researchers in the fitness industry, who have helped resistance training evolve to our present level, need to now champion innovative ways to help people start, progress, and maintain lifelong resistance training for all people. As we progress into this next chapter of lifelong resistance training for all, perhaps we all need to continually affirm this author's philosophical slogan, “with every repetition, we all get stronger and healthier.”


In the following video clips, you will find practical tutorials on how to teach and progress the following exercises.

Squat: see Supplemental Digital Content 1, Video,

Hip hinge: see Supplemental Digital Content 2, Video,

Horizontal push: see Supplemental Digital Content 3, Video,

Horizontal pull: see Supplemental Digital Content 4, Video,

Vertical press: see Supplemental Digital Content 5, Video,

Vertical pull: see Supplemental Digital Content 6, Video,

Carry teach: see Supplemental Digital Content 7, Video,


Humans have evolved and adapted for a wide range of unique physical activities. Excessive sitting lifestyles have inspired a new science on sedentary behavior to better understand the deleterious outcomes of too much sitting and ways to thwart it. We now have the most compelling of research studies that indicate regular participation in resistance training is health promoting and successful in disease prevention and management for youth, adults, and older adults. Following established evidence-based guidelines of resistance training provides practitioners with the directions for individualized progressive resistance training guidelines for each person's fitness level, goals, and needs. Periodic variation of a resistance training program is necessary to prevent plateaus in training and to motivate clients to continue forward in their training for lifelong healthy living.


Special thanks to Zachary Mang, M.S., doctoral student in Exercise Science at the University of Mexico for creating the instructional videos to accompany this article.


1. Lieberman DE. Is exercise really medicine? An evolutionary perspective. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2015;14(4):313–9.
2. Levine JA. Sick of sitting. Diabetologia. 2015;58:1751–8.
3. García-Hermoso A, Cavero-Redondo I, Ramírez-Vélez R, et al. Muscular strength as a predictor of all-cause mortality in an apparently healthy population: a systematic review and meta-analysis of data from approximately 2 million men and women. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;99(10):2100–13.e5. doi: 10.1016/ j.apmr.2018.01.008
4. Lloyd RS, Faigenbaum AD, Stone MH, et al. Position statement on youth resistance training: the 2014 International Consensus. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48:498–505.
5. Westcott WL. Build muscle, improve health: benefits associated with resistance exercise. ACSMs Health Fit J. 2015;19(4):22–7.
6. Borde R, Hortobágyi T, Granacher U. Dose–response relationships of resistance training in healthy old adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2015;45(12):1693–720.
7. Csapo R, Alegre LM. Effects of resistance training with moderate vs heavy loads on muscle mass and strength in the elderly: a meta-analysis. Scand J Med Sci Sport. 2016;26(9):995–1006.
8. World Health Organization (WHO). Nutrition for older persons. 2018. [cited 2018 Mar 30]. Available from:
9. Gómez-Cabello A, Ara I, González-Agüero A, Casajús J, Vicente-Rodríguez G. Effects of training on bone mass in older adults: a systematic review. Sports Med. 2012;42(4):301–25.
10. Strasser B, Schobersberger W. Evidence for resistance training as a treatment therapy in obesity. J Obes. 2011;2011: Article ID 482564, 9 pages. doi:10.1155/2011/482564.
11. American Diabetes Association. Lifestyle management: standards of medical care in diabetes — 2018. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(Suppl 1):S38–50.
12. Ishiguro H, Kodama S, Horikawa C, et al. In search of the ideal resistance training program to improve glycemic control and its indication for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2016;46:67–77.
13. Behm DG, Faigenbaum AD, Falk B, Klentrou P. Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology position paper: resistance training in children and adolescents. Appl Physiol Nut Metab. 2008;33(3):547–61.
14. Faigenbaum AD, Kraemer WJ, Blimkie CJ. Youth resistance training: updated position statement paper from the National Strength and Conditioning Association. J Strength Cond Res. 2009;23(5 Suppl):S60–79.
15. Fraser BJ, Schmidt MD, Huynh QL, et al. Tracking of muscular strength and power from youth to young adulthood: longitudinal findings from the Childhood Determinants of Adult Health Study. J Sci Med Sport. 2017;20(10):927–31.
16. Nunez TP, Amorim FT, Janot JM, et al. Circuit weight training: acute and chronic effects on health and clinical populations. J Sport Human Perf. 2017;5(3):1–21.
17. American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. 10th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Wolters Kluwer; 2018.
18. Kraemer WJ, Ratamess NA, French DN. Resistance training for health and performance. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2002;1(3):165–71.
19. Sorace P, Ronai P, Churilla JR. Resistance training and metabolic syndrome: muscles do matter. ACSMs Health Fit J. 2014;18(6):24–9. doi: 10.1249/FIT.0000000000000074
20. Latham NK, Bennett DA, Stretton CM, Anderson CS. Systematic review of progressive resistance strength training in older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004;59(1):48–61.

Resistance Training; Weight Training; Exercise; Health

Supplemental Digital Content

Copyright © 2019 by American College of Sports Medicine.