Working with clients who display controlled reasons to exercise: Clients who are predominantly motivated by controlled motivation are subject to pervasive internal or external pressures, which can inhibit the establishment of a connection between the person and the exercise behavior. Clients who hold controlled reasons for exercise may look at exercise behavior as a “chore” that they have to complete; thus, it is especially important to help these clients find personal meaning associated with exercising. However, it is not enough to simply explain the benefits of regular exercise because this will only have a marginal impact; there also must be an individualized rationale for exercising provided. For example, if a client struggles with poor sleeping patterns (insomnia), highlighting that exercise has proven benefits for sleep quality will be more helpful than offering the full range of benefits. An important strategy in this regard will be helping the client establish a meaningful connection between what is important to him or her, what he or she values, and what he or she wants to accomplish (not only in terms of health but also for life in general). For example, if a client states that he or she was offered a new job position involving a lot of responsibility, simply raising the question “In what way can going to the gym help you with this new challenge?” can induce important reflections regarding the role of exercise, helping him or her to attach new meaning to exercise (“it would help me to manage the stress”; “It allows me to think” etc.). Inviting clients to experience different types of exercise also can be important. Sometimes, people have very little previous experience with exercise, thus they cannot know which exercises they prefer, and neither can they know the quality of their experience. Inviting the client to experiment with a certain catalogue of different activities could be beneficial for novice exercisers.
The aforementioned strategies will make it more likely that a client chooses to exercise because of more autonomous, self-determined reasons (e.g., identified regulation), which increases the willingness and readiness to exercise. As such, the motivational quantity and, most importantly, quality will have improved in that the client exercises not because one has to but because one wants to. Furthermore, to be able to value exercise, the client needs to feel competent enough to engage in a given exercise. Perceived competence can be achieved by setting realistic goals collaboratively with the client and by reflecting what the client may expect in terms of exercise-related outcomes (11). Furthermore, instructors should build on the abilities that their clients already have before introducing new challenges. A client who enjoys cycling can be challenged by prolonging his or her route and by cycling uphill. Furthermore, clients should be able to acquire new skills, such as learning to observe their progress (self-monitoring) by tracking their behavior through smart watches or other wearables. Finally, teaching clients how to deal effectively with barriers (e.g., when it is raining, wear waterproof clothes or go indoor cycling instead) as well as providing informational feedback (e.g., on goal progress) and instrumental skill training enables the client to feel more effective.
Working with clients who identify with exercising but still do not really enjoy it: Clients who identify with the benefits of exercising are already heading in the right direction because they have found some personal meaning in the exercise behavior. To make exercise more enjoyable for them, it is important to identify not only which exercise activities the client already enjoys and finds compatible with their other values but also other activities that the client would look forward to engaging in. Fortunately, the exercise context offers numerous opportunities to satisfy one’s basic needs, for example, by offering choices and providing optimal challenges in terms of exercise goals or type of exercise and also regarding the context and social interactions (e.g., meeting new people, new trails, new classes, new devices to track exercise, new cities to visit by foot, etc.). Nonetheless, and despite the fact that enjoyment (intrinsic motivation) is a strong predictor of continuous exercise adherence, it is not an absolute prerequisite. Research has shown that autonomous regulations, in general, increase and are sustained over time (leading to sustained behavioral adherence (10,12,15). It seems that having highly integrated reasons for exercising (even without the fun and enjoyment components) are enough to keep an individual engaged with his or her chosen behavior (10) (e.g., I don’t absolutely enjoy going to the gym, but it is important for me because it allows me to be fit enough to play football twice a week with my friends without incurring injury, which is something that I really value! I´ve done this for the last 3 years and I realize that is something worth keeping).
Working with clients who enjoy exercising: Clients who truly enjoy exercising can still be encouraged to challenge themselves and to make exercise continuously interesting for themselves and others. Challenges (e.g., starting a new class, training for a marathon, running/walking on a new track) might help them to further appreciate being physically active and support both their need for competence and autonomy. Furthermore, the use of digital devices (e.g., smart watches, wearables) offers the user the option of using applications for games, such as story running (interactive audio books in which the runner has a mission to accomplish and obstacles to overcome), or to follow friends’ workouts and goal progress, which can make exercising more entertaining. In addition, creating exercise groups can bring in new dynamics, not least because exchanging and sharing ideas, tips, and experiences helps people to stay motivated. Similarly, teaming up with an exercise buddy may support continued physical activity because of the enjoyment and meaning of social interaction or by positive comparison also while allowing clients to see how others, similar to them, overcome barriers.
Lastly, it should be emphasized that the ultimate goal is not necessarily to get everyone shifted toward intrinsic motivation when it comes to exercise. The literature has shown that identified regulation plays a prominent role for the regulation of potentially challenging behaviors like physical activity and exercise, underlining the importance of internalizing behavior-related values (13). Because some people are never going to “love exercise,” instructors are simply encouraged to help clients find meaningfulness in exercising because as long as exercising suits the clients’ daily routines and feels valuable and acceptable, it is likely that it will be sustained. Furthermore, although some exercise activities might be highly recommended for everyone (e.g., core stabilization exercises), instructors cannot expect excitement and enjoyment on the part of the client in every activity because of the monotonous nature of some forms of exercise. In these cases, it is important to help the client understand their importance and support him or her in finding value in them (i.e., identified regulation), rather than aiming for fun and enjoyment.
A final note should be devoted to the exercise professional’s motivation and factors that influence their own motivation because these factors also will determine the way that the instructor will motivate his or her clients and the motivational strategies he or she uses. In this regard, Silva et al. (16) analyzed a chain-like spillover effect: a pressuring work context (e.g., gym policies) caused exercise professionals to pressure their own clients, and, as a result, professionals became emotionally exhausted themselves. In contrast, work contexts that facilitate the satisfaction of the needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness were associated with greater use of need-supportive strategies not only when working with clients but also with greater work-related personal accomplishment in the professional. Results supported the widespread proposition that “what goes around, comes around,” something that is true for the exercise professional, their work environment, and those who most influence it (e.g., managers or directors of a gym). An organizational focus along with policies from the gym or exercise facilities that target the support of clients’ autonomy, competence, and relatedness, also while considering the professionals’ needs, represent important working conditions that should be considered in future.
Case study: Paul, 54: “I thought I got this, but now it’s pushing and pulling again”
The following case study describes the story of Paul and how he managed to deal with his conflicting motivation to become more active. This case study illustrates how the quality of motivation to exercise changes over the course of behavior change.
Paul is a teacher in his fifties. He has returned to exercise after a long period of being physically inactive just a year ago. Paul has a family history of heart disease, which has been preying on his mind in recent years. Having experienced symptoms of weakness, dizziness, and shortness of breath last year, he decided that it was time to make some major changes. He now goes to the local gym a couple of times a week and is trying, fairly successfully, to go swimming on a regular basis. He gave up smoking at around the same time that he started exercising and felt much better, both mentally and physically, after just a few weeks. Paul never particularly enjoyed exercising and usually needed to push and remind himself that he cannot risk a heart attack. Certainly, he knew that he had to provide for his family, but his wife also kept complaining that he had put on weight and should exercise a little more. Despite these pressures, he had never felt energized before and was convinced that if he continued to try hard and push himself, he could keep up his exercise regimen.
A month ago, he had a cold and needed to take a break from exercising. He felt the same physical weakness that he had experienced a year ago when he was not exercising. At around the same time, he started experiencing nagging doubts, causing him to question why he was doing the exercises if he still felt the same as last year. Why should he go to the gym next time if, in the end, all of his effort was not going to pay off? Even though he was aware of these mind games, he couldn’t prevent them…
Why is Paul now experiencing this motivational setback? It seems that not all of Paul’s personal reasons are truly self-chosen but rather self- or other-imposed. Paul started exercising partly because he was afraid of experiencing a heart attack, but more because he wanted to reassure his wife (i.e., external regulation). His main motivation was, therefore, predominantly based on the avoidance of external pressures (blame from his wife) rather than the expectation of positive outcomes through exercise (e.g., improved well-being). Furthermore, Paul knew that he was not taking good care of his health, and that he needed to make some changes to his lifestyle. He also might have experienced feelings of shame and guilt as he was not taking responsibility for acting health-consciously (i.e., introjected regulation). Thus, Paul’s motivation was predominantly “controlled” by external or internal pressures, which might have prevented him from establishing a personal, meaningful connection with exercising, making him unlikely to maintain it.
To overcome his ambivalence toward exercise, Paul decided to talk to an exercise instructor. He told the instructor about his situation and his conflicting motivation. To help Paul get back on track, the instructor realized that it would be essential to encourage Paul to find personal meaning in exercise and to help him understand the reasons why he was doing certain exercises (i.e., giving a clear and individualized rationale). To achieve this, the instructor asked Paul what he would expect from exercising on a regular basis and in what way exercise could help him to achieve his goal of becoming healthier. These questions evoked important self-reflections in Paul regarding the role exercise plays for him: he started realizing that he could sleep much better after working out, that he felt more energized and capable, and that he started to enjoy having some “alone time” at the gym. Step by step, these reflections helped Paul to attach a new personal meaning to exercise and prompted him to make lasting changes to his lifestyle. At this point, Paul experienced a shift in his motivational focus. Even though it took some time, Paul felt in “good hands” and is now back on track.
BRIDGING THE GAP
People exercise for a wide variety of reasons that may fluctuate from exercise initiation to prolonged adoption depending on the behavioral context they are in. To understand exercise behavior, both the quantity and quality of motivation need to be taken into account. This article reviews how health and fitness instructors can better understand their clients’ motivation quality, and how they can help their clients to reframe their externally imposed reasons for exercise into reasons that are more self- and personally determined.
The authors thank Matthew J. Watson for professionally proofreading the English language of the manuscript before submission.
1. Daley AJ, Duda JL. Self-determination, stage of readiness to change for exercise, and frequency of physical activity in young people. Eur J Sport Sci
2. Deci EL, Ryan RM. The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: human needs and self-determination of behavior. Psychol Inq
3. Dishman RK. The problem of exercise adherence: fighting sloth in nations with market economics. Quest
4. Edmunds J, Ntoumanis N, Duda JL. Helping your clients and patients take ownership over their exercise: Fostering exercise adoption, adherence, and associated well-being. ACSMs Health Fit J
5. Hallal PC, Andersen LB, Bull FC, Guthold R, Haskell W, Ekelund U, Lancet Physical Activity Series Working Group. Global physical activity levels: surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects. Lancet
6. Mears J, Kilpatrick M. Motivation for exercise: Applying theory to make a difference in adoption and adherence. ACSMs Health Fit J
7. Patrick H, Williams GC. Self-determination theory
: its application to health behavior and complementarity with motivational interviewing. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act
8. Rodgers WM, Loitz CC. The role of motivation in behavior change: how do we encourage our clients to be active? ACSMs Health Fit J
9. Ryan RM, Williams GC, Patrick H, Deci EL. Self-determination theory
and physical activity: the dynamics of motivation in development and wellness. Hell J Psychol
10. Silva MN, Markland D, Carraça EV, et al. Exercise autonomous motivation predicts 3-yr weight loss in women. Med Sci Sport Exerc
11. Silva MN, Marques MM, Teixeira PJ. Testing theory in practice: the example of self-determination theory
-based interventions. Eur Health Psychol
. 2014:16(5): 171–80.
12. Silva MN, Teixeira PJ. Promotion of and adherence to physical activity. In: Mooren FC, Skinner JS, editors. Encyclopedia of Exercise Medicine in Health and Disease
. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2012, p. 727–31.
13. Teixeira PJ, Carraça EV, Markland D, Silva MN, Ryan RM. Exercise, physical activity, and self-determination theory
: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act
14. Vansteenkiste M, Ryan RM. On psychological growth and vulnerability: basic psychological need satisfaction and need frustration as a unifying principle. J Psychother Integr
15. Wasserkampf A, Kleinert J. Organismic integration as a dynamic process: a systematic review of empirical studies on change in behavioral regulations in exercise in adults. Int Rev Sport Exerc
16. Silva MN, Sánchez-Oliva D, Brunet J, Williams GC, Teixeira PJ, Palmeira AL. “What goes around comes around”: antecedents, mediators, and consequences of controlling vs. need-supportive motivational strategies used by exercise professionals. Ann Behav Med
. 2017; DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12160-017-9894-0
8–10 multiple choice questions (right answer indicated with asterisks)
- 1. The basic psychological need for relatedness means that
- a)People feel to be the origin of their own behavior
- b)People feel related and connected to others***
- c)People feel controlled by others
- d)People feel effective when interacting
- 2. Amotivation reflects
- a)A state of lacking intentions to engage in exercise***
- b)Exercise engagement due to perceived meaningfulness and valuation of exercise-related outcomes
- c)Exercise engagement because the activity itself is inherently interesting
- d)Exercise engagement to obtain external rewards or to avoid punishment
- 3. Internalization means that…
- a)Individual reasons for exercising are controlled by others
- b)Individual reasons for exercising are meaningless to oneself
- c)Individual reasons for exercising are integrated and taken into oneself***
- d)Individual reasons for exercising are unintentional
- 4. Motivational dynamics are best described by
- a)A process in which behavioral regulations to exercise are controlled by rewards
- b)A process in which behavioral regulations to exercise are controlled by others
- c)A process in which behavioral regulations to exercise remain stable over time
- d)A process in which behavioral reasons to exercise change over time***
- 5. Health and fitness instructors are encouraged to
- a)Set deadlines and control their clients
- b)To try to understand their clients’ reasons for exercising***
- c)To pressure their clients when no progress is made
- d)To develop rigid training plans
- 6. A shift toward more autonomous forms of motivation can be achieved when the exercise context is
- a)Need supportive***
- b)Need thwarting
- c)Need frustrating
- d)Need disruptive
- 7. Clients who find exercising important, however, do not find it thrilling and enjoyable can be dealt with by
- a)Providing extremely easy challenges, allowing social interactions, offering choices
- b)Providing no challenges and increasing social interactions
- c)Providing extreme challenges, allowing social interactions, not offering choices
- d)Providing optimal challenges, allowing social interactions, offering choices ***
- 8. Pressuring gym policies
- a)May influence health and fitness instructors to pressure their clients***
- b)May motivate autonomy in the professionals by pressuring them to perform
- c)May facilitate the satisfaction of basic psychological needs
- d)May facilitate the internalization process
- 9. Identified regulation reflects
- a)Exercise engagement to obtain rewards or to avoid punishment
- b)Exercise engagement without intending to achieve an outcome
- c)Exercise engagement because exercising is a part of oneself
- d)Exercise engagement because one values exercise related outcomes***
Keywords:© 2017 American College of Sports Medicine.
Self-determination Theory; Exercise Behavioral Regulations; Motivational Dynamics; Need-Supportive Climate