Several observational studies suggest that low vitamin D status, particularly in older adults, has been associated with reduced muscle mass, strength and performance, and an increased risk of falls (6,46). Furthermore, a number of intervention studies have shown that supplementation with vitamin D increases appendicular muscle strength and performance and reduces the risk of falls mostly in older individuals with a low baseline vitamin D status (8,34). Although studies have been less consistent in younger populations, studies on vitamin D supplementation in younger vitamin D-deficient adults has suggested muscle-related benefits (38,45).
The mechanism by which vitamin D exerts these beneficial effects in skeletal muscle has not been established definitively but has been under extensive investigation in the last several years. The actions of vitamin D on skeletal muscle may, in part, be indirect by way of vitamin D’s effect on calcium and phosphate homeostasis possibly via mechanisms mediated by intestinal absorption. A study in vitamin D-deficient rats found muscle weakness only in animals with concomitant hypophosphatemia and reported improvements in muscle strength only in the animals that had resolution of hypophosphatemia with vitamin D supplementation (37). However, recent data suggest that the actions of vitamin D on skeletal muscle also occur via a direct mechanism — the receptor for 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin-D3 (vitamin D receptor (VDR)). Research by Srikuea et al. (40) localized VDR and CYP27B1 (1-α-hydroxylase) expression in C2C12 myoblasts and adult muscle cells in rodents using various techniques. Work from our laboratory, as well as those of others, also has identified VDR in human muscle biopsies (7,13) (Pojednic, R.M., et al., unpublished observations, 2013) and has shown an increase in VDR concentration and single cross-sectional muscle fiber size after vitamin D supplementation (15).
We hypothesize that vitamin D acts, at least in part, on skeletal muscle tissue through the VDR in myocytes, and it may influence several key biological pathways essential to skeletal muscle function. This review summarizes current evidence for a direct biomolecular role of vitamin D in skeletal muscle. Specifically, we will examine studies focused on the localization and role of the VDR in skeletal muscle, the recent identification and significance of CYP27B1 (1-α-hydroxylase) in skeletal muscle, and the potential skeletal muscle biological pathways influenced by vitamin D.
VITAMIN D METABOLISM
Vitamin D is regarded traditionally as a regulator of bone metabolism through the homeostatic control of calcium and phosphate. Vitamin D3, the prohormone, is produced in the skin after exposure to sunlight and is acquired less commonly through a limited selection of dietary sources. Bound to a vitamin D binding protein, vitamin D3 is transported to the liver where it is hydroxylated to 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25OHD3), the major circulating form of vitamin D and biomarker of vitamin D status. 25OHD3 is further hydroxylated to the active hormone, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25(OH)2D3), primarily via activity of the enzyme, 1-α-hydroxylase, encoded by the gene CYP27B1 in the kidney and also in several other tissues including the placenta, macrophages, and monocytes (18). Notably, a recent study was able to clone the full-length CYP27B1 mRNA transcript from C2C12 myotubes and found evidence of constitutive expression of CYP27B1 protein in both the cytoplasm and mitochondria of C2C12 myoblasts and the cytoplasm of C2C12 myotubes (40). The report also localized increased CYP27B1 protein expression in BaCl2-induced regenerating fibers of mouse tibialis anterior muscle. These data provide support for the concept that skeletal muscle is a target organ of vitamin D action (Fig. 1).
Characterization of the VDR
The biologically active 1,25(OH)2D3 binds to a classic steroid receptor, also known as the VDR. As described with other steroid receptors, the VDR principally acts as a nuclear transcription factor; however, a nonnuclear receptor mediating nongenomic actions also has been described (18). Within the nucleus, the VDR heterodimerizes with the retinoid x receptor (RXR) and the VDR/RXR complex binds to the VDR response element, resulting in the expression of genes involved in several components of cellular metabolism and function (17). The characterization and mechanism of action of the putative nonnuclear VDR have not been established definitively; however, binding of 1,25(OH)2D3 to a nonnuclear VDR is proposed to initiate the formation of a second messenger or phosphorylation of intracellular proteins resulting in rapid cellular effects occurring within seconds to minutes. Some have proposed it to be a novel membrane receptor (33), whereas others have suggested a membrane-associated calcium-binding protein that functions as a calcium-specific ion channel (2). However, more recent studies have characterized the nonnuclear VDR as the nuclear VDR itself, which translocates from the nucleus to the plasma membrane within cholesterol and sphingolipid-rich caveolae microdomains that concentrate components of certain signal transduction pathways (9,12,26). Garcia et al. (26) also used immunofluorescent analysis of VDR protein at 1 and 4 d after 1,25(OH)2D3 administration in C2C12 skeletal muscle cells and showed both a reduction in cytoplasmic fluorescent staining and a corresponding increase in nuclear staining from days 1 to 4, implicating translocation of the VDR to the myonucleus.
Localization of VDR in Human Skeletal Muscle
The VDR has been isolated in several human tissues (18), including skeletal muscle (7,13,20). Costa et al. (20) initially identified the VDR in cloned human skeletal muscle cells. Bischoff et al. (7) demonstrated intramyonuclear staining for the VDR using VDR antibody 97A (Affinity BioReagents) in frozen cross sections of human skeletal muscle by means of immunohistochemistry. Yet the isolation of the VDR in skeletal muscle tissue has not been consistent across all studies. A recent report questioned the selectivity of the VDR antibody 97A because it was reacting with proteins on Western blot not related to the VDR, even in a VDR knockout mouse model (44). However, more recent studies using multiple alternate VDR antibodies lend support to the presence of VDR in skeletal myocytes (13,15,27,40) (Pojednic, R.M., et al., unpublished observations, 2013). A study in older women detected VDR in frozen muscle cross sections by Western blot using multiple commercial antibodies to the VDR, including a monoclonal VDR antibody D-6 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), which is reported to have the best specificity for VDR protein because it is not detected in muscle of VDR knockout mice and C57BL/6 mice by immunohistochemistry and Western blot (13). A study by Srikuea et al. (40) combined the use of Western blot, immunocytochemistry, polymerase chain reaction cloning, and DNA sequencing to validate the expression and concentration of the VDR in the C2C12 mouse cell line and adult mouse skeletal muscle cells. Of note, this study found VDR protein primarily expressed in the nucleus of myoblasts and adult mouse muscle cells and in the cytoplasm of C2C12 myotubes. Although this last study did not use human muscle cells, the authors used multiple analytic techniques to localize the presence of VDR in skeletal muscle cells. Most recently, Girgis and colleagues (27) demonstrated that C2C12 cells express VDR, CYP27B1 (1-α-hydroxylase), CYP24A1, and vitamin D binding protein at the transcript level. The study also showed increased expression of VDR mRNA after 48 h of treatment with 1,25(OH)2D3 with concomitant increases in CYP24A1, a classic VDR target gene.
With regard to human tissue, Pojednic et al. (unpublished observations, 2013) used Western blot and polymerase chain reaction techniques to isolate both gene and protein expression of VDR in human primary myoblasts and human biopsied vastus lateralis muscle. In addition to VDR localization in skeletal muscle, this study also was able to demonstrate an association between serum 25OHD and alterations in VDR expression and concentration in human muscle tissue.
EVIDENCE FOR VDR-MEDIATED VITAMIN D ACTION IN SKELETAL MUSCLE
Cell and Animal Studies
Based on data in the VDR-knockout mouse model, cell culture, and other rodent studies, it has been proposed that the effects of vitamin D on skeletal muscle may, at least in part, be mediated by the VDR (Fig. 2). The VDR-knockout mouse model, for example, has muscle fibers that are approximately 20% smaller and more variable in size than those in wild-type mice, and its muscle expresses increased levels of myogenic differentiation factors including Myf5, E2A, and myogenin compared with that in the wild type (24). In addition, the VDR-null mutant mice have lower body size and weight and impaired motor coordination compared with wild-type animals. These findings were noted in animals that were corrected for metabolic and electrolyte abnormalities, particularly in calcium and phosphate.
Recent data have reported alterations in expression and concentration of the VDR in skeletal muscle cells after administration of 1,25(OH)2D3. Previous studies in classical VDR target tissues, intestine and bone (21,30), have indicated that the content of VDR in these target tissues is associated positively with the level of biological activity in response to vitamin D administration. Therefore, an increase in VDR content in skeletal muscle cells after vitamin D administration would lend support to the concept that there may be effects on muscle metabolism and/or function. Three separate laboratories independently reported that VDR mRNA expression increased in C2C12 myoblasts (26,27,40). Garcia et al. (26) and Srikuea et al. (40) demonstrated a more than fivefold increase of VDR after 4 d of 1,25(OH)2D3 administration compared with that in control. The increased expression was further confirmed by Western blot analyses using whole-cell culture homogenates and immunofluorescence studies under similar conditions. Two of the three studies noted similar effects on VDR expression after treatment with 25OHD3, suggesting a common mechanism (27,40). Srikuea et al. (40) also examined regenerating mouse skeletal muscle in vivo and found that murine regenerating muscle fibers had greater expression of VDR compared with that in nonregenerating fibers, suggesting a link between muscle cell regeneration and activation of VDR.
A recent study by Tanaka and colleagues (43) demonstrated that silencing VDR in C2C12 and G8 murine cells via siRNA resulted in decreased myosin heavy-chain mRNA and protein levels, as well as decreased myogenin mRNA expression and MyoD protein concentration. These authors suggest that skeletal muscle may indeed require VDR-mediated signaling for successful myoblast differentiation into myocytes.
Little is known about the regulation or action of the VDR in human skeletal muscle. Aging may decrease expression of the VDR in skeletal muscle, as was suggested by a previous report (5). A recent study in older adults (Pojednic, R.M., et al., unpublished observations, 2013) found a positive association between serum 25OHD and VDR concentration in skeletal muscle tissue biopsies. Furthermore, similar to recent cell culture studies (27,40), Pojednic et al. (unpublished observations, 2013) found an increase in VDR mRNA in human primary myoblasts treated with 1,25(OH)2D3. Finally, a randomized study in 14 older vitamin D-insufficient women found that supplementation with vitamin D3 increased intramyonuclear VDR concentration by 30% compared with that with placebo during a 4-month period (15). Despite this recent work, studies that examine actions downstream of the VDR in human muscle are lacking.
In humans, there have been a number of studies on VDR polymorphisms, or subtle alterations in the DNA sequence of the VDR gene, and the possible impact on muscle function. Polymorphisms of the VDR have been associated with variations in muscle strength in young women (28) and elderly men (1). In addition, older Japanese men and women, with varying VDR polymorphisms, demonstrated disparate increases in functional assessment of activities of daily living after a strength training intervention (32). The mechanisms by which these polymorphisms interact with skeletal muscle are yet unclear.
POTENTIAL EFFECTS OF VITAMIN D ON BIOLOGICAL PATHWAYS IN MUSCLE
Muscle Contraction and Function
Administration of 1,25(OH)2D3 in muscle cell culture regulates the expression of genes that affect cell calcium handling, which is important in muscle contraction (23,25,26). 1,25(OH)2D3 is thought to modulate muscle cell calcium flux by altering the activity of calcium pumps via a calcium binding protein, D9K, located in the sarcoplasmic reticulum and sarcolemma, thereby impacting muscle contraction (48). 1,25(OH)2D3 also may influence muscle cell contractility by increasing the synthesis of calmodulin, a calcium binding protein that, among several other actions, regulates muscle contraction (23).
In addition, a recent intervention study in vitamin D-deficient humans found that supplementation with vitamin D augmented maximal mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation after exercise, suggesting improvements in skeletal muscle function (38).
Muscle Cell Proliferation
Treatment of C2C12 murine skeletal muscle cells with 1,25(OH)2D3 decreases cellular proliferation. Garcia et al. (26) reported a 75% reduction in proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) expression after a 7-d incubation with 1,25(OH)2D3. PCNA is a protein expressed in the nuclei of cells during DNA synthesis and, thus, is a marker of cellular proliferation. In a similar study, Srikuea et al. (40) and Girgis et al. (27) noted a significant reduction in BrdU incorporation in C2C12 skeletal myoblasts after 2 d of treatment with both 25OHD3 and 1,25(OH)2D3. BrdU is a thymidine analog that is incorporated into the DNA of replicating cells and is another indicator of cellular proliferation. Interestingly, in C2C12 cells, both 1,25(OH)2D3 as well as 25OHD seem to inhibit myoblast proliferation in a similar manner (27,40).
Muscle Cell Differention/Myogenesis
1,25(OH)2D3 stimulates muscle cell differentiation through the modulation of several growth factors and inhibitors. Garcia et al. (26) demonstrated that addition of 1,25(OH)2D3 to C2C12 myoblasts enhanced myogenesis by increasing the expression of promyogenic growth factors IGF-2 and follistatin and decreasing the expression of myostatin, a negative regulator of muscle mass. Tanaka et al. (43) found that suppressing VDR expression by RNA interference led to decreased expression of mRNA and protein levels of a variety of myogenic factors including MyoD, myogenin, MRF4, and Myf5 in C2C12 and G8 cell lines. Morphological changes in the myotube formation also were noted. Additional work in C2C12 cells by Garcia et al. (25) revealed that the promyogenic effects of 1,25(OH)2D3 may further involve effects on angiogenesis via increased expression of angiogenic growth factors VEGFα and FGF-1 and decreased angiogenic inhibitors FGF-2 and TIMP-3.
Several studies have examined the effect of vitamin D on known anabolic signaling pathways involved in skeletal muscle growth. Treatment of C2C12 myotubes with 1,25(OH)2D3 sensitized the Akt/mTOR-dependent pathway to the known stimulating effect of leucine and insulin, resulting in a further activation of protein synthesis (35). In rats on an alkali diet, vitamin D3 supplementation enhanced phosphorylated Akt protein concentration, an established component of the skeletal muscle anabolic cascade (14). Lastly, 1,25(OH)2D3 has been shown to upregulate Akt directly through Src, PI3K, and p38 MAPK, which stimulate myogenesis in C2C12 cells (11), potentially through a VDR-dependent mechanism (10).
Notably, further support in the potential role of vitamin D in muscle growth stems from human muscle biopsy studies examining effects at the histological level by measuring changes in muscle fiber size. An uncontrolled study in 11 older osteoporotic women with profound vitamin D deficiency found an increase in Type IIa muscle fiber cross-sectional area after 3 to 6 months of treatment with 1-α-hydroxyvitamin D and calcium (39). A randomized study found that treatment of older Japanese female stroke survivors with 1000 IU of vitamin D2 daily increased the mean Type II muscle fiber diameter by more than 90% during a 2-yr period in the nonparetic limb compared with placebo (36). In these rehabilitated women whose baseline 25OHD3 levels were less than 25 nmol/L, there also was a correlation between serum 25OHD3 level and Type II muscle fiber diameter both at baseline and after 2 yr of follow-up. Finally, a recent intervention study found a 10% increase in total (Types I and II) muscle fiber cross-sectional area after 4 months of vitamin D3 supplementation versus placebo in older mobility-limited and vitamin D-insufficient women (15). This relationship is corroborated in C2C12 cells in vitro, by which myotubes are increased markedly in diameter after 10-d treatment with 1,25(OH)2-D3, as well as 25OHD, potentially through an inhibitory effect of 1,25(OH)2D3 on myostatin (27).
Vitamin D status has been implicated in the regulation of inflammation in nonmuscle tissue. Vitamin D, particularly the active hormone 1,25(OH)2D3, has been shown to suppress the production of several proinflammatory cytokines in serum, including interleukin 6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) (29), as well as reduce nuclear factor-κB (NFκB) expression, binding, and transcriptional activity in human and mouse fibroblasts and dendritic cells (22,31). These actions are thought to be mediated by the VDR, which has been localized in immune cells and fibroblasts. Activation of the VDR on mouse embryonic fibroblasts seems to inhibit NFκB activation and subsequent synthesis of proinflammatory cytokines (42). Furthermore, VDR-null mutant mice have increased markers of intestinal epithelial cell inflammation both intracellularly via NFκB and in serum via IL-6, a well-known NFκB target gene (47).
Based on evidence from nonmuscle tissues and increasing knowledge with regard to skeletal muscle, vitamin D also may play a role in the regulation of pathways of intramuscular inflammation. Vitamin D status has been associated with reduced circulatory inflammatory markers and concomitant impairments in peak power in healthy adults (4). Serum 25OHD also has been implicated in skeletal muscle recovery after exercise and injury (3,16,41). In humans, vitamin D supplementation resulted in an attenuation of exercise-induced muscle weakness compared with control (3). In rats exposed to crush injury, vitamin D supplementation resulted in significant increases in muscle cell regeneration and extracellular matrix proteins and decreases in muscle cell apoptosis (41). In a randomized controlled study in rats, vitamin D influenced exercise-induced muscle damage and inflammation through the modulation of MAPK and NF-κB pathways possibly mediated by VDR (16). Specifically, this latter study found that the skeletal muscle of vitamin D-treated rats exposed to high-intensity exercise demonstrated an increase in skeletal muscle VDR with reduced expression of p38, ERK1/2, IKK, and IκB, key regulatory kinases in the inflammation signaling cascade, and subsequent reductions in proinflammatory TNF-α and IL-6 when compared with that with placebo (16).
A growing number of studies have suggested a beneficial effect of vitamin D on skeletal muscle strength and physical performance, particularly in older adults. Emerging evidence from both preclinical and clinical studies has begun to elucidate major molecular mechanisms by which vitamin D acts on skeletal muscle cells. Recent data localizing CYP27B1 (1-α-hydroxylase) and VDR protein expression in skeletal muscle cells provide support for a direct action of vitamin D. In addition, VDR-knockout mouse models and VDR polymorphisms further implicate that the VDR plays a role in skeletal muscle cell development and function. As in classic vitamin D target tissues, administration of vitamin D increases VDR gene and protein expression in muscle, suggesting increased biological activity. Although VDR downstream signaling cascades in skeletal muscle have yet to be well characterized, recent cell culture data suggest that major biological pathways including muscle contraction, cell proliferation, cell differentiation, growth, and inflammation are altered after the administration of vitamin D.
Despite the advances in understanding of the underlying molecular actions of vitamin D in skeletal muscle, there still are many gaps in knowledge that require further investigation. As molecular and cellular mechanisms become better understood, the next step will be to examine how these tissue-level events translate into changes in muscle mass, strength, and function.
The manuscript preparation was supported by funding from an NHLBI predoctoral training grant (T32HL69772) to R.M. Pojednic.
The authors have no known conflicts of interest.
1. Bahat G, Saka B, Erten N, et al. BsmI polymorphism in the vitamin D receptor
gene is associated with leg extensor muscle strength in elderly men. Aging Clin. Exp. Res.
2010; 22 (3): 198–205.
2. Baran DT, Quail JM, Ray R, Honeyman T. Binding of 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) to annexin II: effect of vitamin D
metabolites and calcium. J. Cell Biochem.
2000; 80 (2): 259–65.
3. Barker T, Henriksen VT, Martins TB, et al. Higher serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D
concentrations associate with a faster recovery of skeletal muscle
strength after muscular injury. Nutrients
. 2013; 5 (4): 1253–75.
4. Barker T, Martins TB, Hill HR, et al. Circulating proinflammatory cytokines are elevated and peak power output correlates with 25-hydroxyvitamin D
in vitamin D
insufficient adults. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol.
2013; 113 (6): 1523–34.
5. Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Borchers M, Gudat F, Durmuller U, Stahelin HB, Dick W. Vitamin D receptor
expression in human muscle tissue decreases with age. J. Bone Miner. Res.
2004; 19 (2): 265–9.
6. Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Dawson-Hughes B, Willett WC, et al. Effect of Vitamin D
on falls: a meta-analysis. JAMA
. 2004; 291 (16): 1999–2006.
7. Bischoff HA, Borchers M, Gudat F, et al. In situ
detection of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 receptor in human skeletal muscle
tissue. Histochem. J.
2001; 33 (1): 19–24.
8. Bischoff HA, Stahelin HB, Dick W, et al. Effects of vitamin D
and calcium supplementation on falls: a randomized controlled trial. J. Bone Miner. Res.
2003; 18 (2): 343–51.
9. Buitrago C, Boland R. Caveolae and caveolin-1 are implicated in 1alpha,25(OH)2-vitamin D3–dependent modulation of Src, MAPK cascades and VDR localization in skeletal muscle
cells. J. Steroid Biochem. Molec. Biol.
2010; 121 (1-2): 169–75.
10. Buitrago C, Pardo VG, Boland R. Role of VDR in 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D–dependent non-genomic activation of MAPKs, Src and Akt in skeletal muscle
cells. J. Steroid Biochem. Molec. Biol
11. Buitrago CG, Arango NS, Boland RL. 1Alpha,25(OH)2
-dependent modulation of Akt in proliferating and differentiating C2
C12 skeletal muscle
cells. J. Cell Biochem.
2012; 113 (4): 1170–81.
12. Capiati D, Benassati S, Boland RL. 1,25(OH)2
induces translocation of the vitamin D receptor
(VDR) to the plasma membrane in skeletal muscle
cells. J. Cell. Biochem.
2002; 86 (1): 128–35.
13. Ceglia L, da Silva Morais M, Park LK, et al. Multi-step immunofluorescent analysis of vitamin D receptor
loci and myosin heavy chain isoforms in human skeletal muscle
. J. Molec. Histol.
2010; 41 (2-3): 137–42.
14. Ceglia L, Fau-Rivas DA, Rivas Da Fau-Pojednic RM, Pojednic Rm Fau-Price LL, et al.
Effects of alkali supplementation and vitamin D
insufficiency on rat skeletal muscle
15. Ceglia L, Niramitmahapanya S, Morais MD, et al. A randomized study on the effect of vitamin D3 supplementation on skeletal muscle
morphology and vitamin D receptor
concentration in older women. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.
16. Choi M, Park H, Cho S, Lee M. Vitamin D3 supplementation modulates inflammatory responses from the muscle damage induced by high-intensity exercise in SD rats. Cytokine
. 2013; 63 (1): 27–35.
17. Christakos S, Ajibade DV, Dhawan P, Fechner AJ, Mady LJ. Vitamin D
: metabolism. Endocrinol. Metab. Clin. North Am.
2010; 39 (2): 243–53.
18. Christakos S, Hewison M, Gardner DG, et al. Vitamin D
: beyond bone. Ann. N Y Acad. Sci.
2013; 1287: 45–58.
19. Cianciolo G, La Manna G, Cappuccilli ML, et al. VDR expression on circulating endothelial progenitor cells in dialysis patients is modulated by 25(OH)D serum levels and calcitriol therapy. Blood Purification
. 2011; 32 (3): 161–73.
20. Costa EM, Blau HM, Feldman D. 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3
receptors and hormonal responses in cloned human skeletal muscle
. 1986; 119 (5): 2214–20.
21. Dokoh S, Donaldson CA, Haussler MR. Influence of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3
on cultured osteogenic sarcoma cells: correlation with the 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3
receptor. Cancer Res.
1984; 44 (5): 2103–9.
22. Dong X, Craig T, Xing N, et al. Direct transcriptional regulation of RelB by 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3
and its analogs: physiologic and therapeutic implications for dendritic cell function. J. Biol. Chem.
2003; 278 (49): 49378–85.
23. Drittanti L, de Boland AR, Boland R. Stimulation of calmodulin synthesis in proliferating myoblasts by 1,25-dihydroxy-vitamin D3
. Mol. Cell Endocrinol.
1990; 74 (2): 143–53.
24. Endo I, Inoue D, Mitsui T, et al. Deletion of vitamin D receptor
gene in mice results in abnormal skeletal muscle
development with deregulated expression of myoregulatory transcription factors. Endocrinology
. 2003; 144 (12): 5138–44.
25. Garcia LA, Ferrini MG, Norris KC, Artaza JN. 1,25(OH)(2)vitamin D
(3) enhances myogenic differentiation by modulating the expression of key angiogenic growth factors and angiogenic inhibitors in C(2)C(12) skeletal muscle
cells. J. Steroid Biochem. Molec. Biol.
2013; 133: 1–11.
26. Garcia LA, King KK, Ferrini MG, Norris KC, Artaza JN. 1,25(OH)2 vitamin D3
stimulates myogenic differentiation by inhibiting cell proliferation and modulating the expression of promyogenic growth factors and myostatin in C2
C12 skeletal muscle
. 2011; 152 (8): 2976–86.
27. Girgis CM, Clifton-Bligh RJ, Mokbel N, Cheng K, Gunton JE, Vitamin D
. Signaling regulates proliferation, differentiation and myotube size in C2
C12 skeletal muscle
28. Grundberg E, Brandstrom H, Ribom EL, Ljunggren O, Mallmin H, Kindmark A. Genetic variation in the human vitamin D receptor
is associated with muscle strength, fat mass and body weight in Swedish women. Eur. J. Endocrinol.
2004; 150 (3): 323–8.
29. Gurlek A, Pittelkow MR, Kumar R. Modulation of growth factor/cytokine synthesis and signaling by 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3): implications in cell growth and differentiation. Endocr. Rev.
2002; 23 (6): 763–86.
30. Halloran BP, DeLuca HF. Appearance of the intestinal cytosolic receptor for 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3
during neonatal development in the rat. J. Biol. Chem.
1981; 256 (14): 7338–42.
31. Harant H, Wolff B, Lindley IJ. 1Alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3
decreases DNA binding of nuclear factor-kappaB in human fibroblasts. FEBS Lett.
1998; 436 (3): 329–34.
32. Murakami S, Otsuki T, Maeda M, et al. Effects of vitamin D receptor
gene polymorphisms on low-resistance training using exercise machines: the “Power Rehabilitation” program. Int. J. Mol. Med.
2009; 23 (1): 81–8.
33. Nemere I, Schwartz Z, Pedrozo H, Sylvia VL, Dean DD, Boyan BD. Identification of a membrane receptor for 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3
which mediates rapid activation of protein kinase C. J. Bone Miner. Res.
1998; 13 (9): 1353–9.
34. Pfeifer M, Begerow B, Minne HW, Abrams C, Nachtigall D, Hansen C. Effects of a short-term vitamin D
and calcium supplementation on body sway and secondary hyperparathyroidism in elderly women. J. Bone Miner. Res.
2000; 15 (6): 1113–8.
35. Salles J, Chanet A, Giraudet C, et al. 1,25(OH)-vitamin D
enhances the stimulating effect of leucine and insulin on protein synthesis rate through Akt/PKB and mTOR mediated pathways in murine C2
skeletal myotubes. Molec. Nutr. Food Res.
36. Sato Y, Iwamoto J, Kanoko T, Satoh K. Low-dose vitamin D
prevents muscular atrophy and reduces falls and hip fractures in women after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Cerebrovasc. Dis.
2005; 20 (3): 187–92.
37. Schubert L, DeLuca HF. Hypophosphatemia is responsible for skeletal muscle
weakness of vitamin D
deficiency. Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
2010; 500 (2): 157–61.
38. Sinha A, Hollingsworth KG, Ball S, Cheetham T. Improving the vitamin D
status of vitamin D
deficient adults is associated with improved mitochondrial oxidative function in skeletal muscle
. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.
2013; 98 (3): E509–13.
39. Sorensen OH, Lund B, Saltin B, et al. Myopathy in bone loss of ageing: improvement by treatment with 1 alpha-hydroxycholecalciferol and calcium. Clin. Sci. (Lond)
. 1979; 56 (2): 157–61.
40. Srikuea R, Zhang X, Park-Sarge OK, Esser KA. VDR and CYP27B1 are expressed in C2
cells and regenerating skeletal muscle
: potential role in suppression of myoblast proliferation. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.
2012; 303 (4): C396–405.
41. Stratos I, Li Z, Herlyn P, et al. Vitamin D
increases cellular turnover and functionally restores the skeletal muscle
after crush injury in rats. Am. J. Pathol.
2013; 182 (3): 895–904.
42. Szeto FL, Sun J, Kong J, et al. Involvement of the vitamin D receptor
in the regulation of NF-kappaB activity in fibroblasts. J. Steroid Biochem. Molec. Biol.
2007; 103 (3-5): 563–6.
43. Tanaka M, Kishimoto KN, Okuno H, Saito H, Itoi E. Vitamin D receptor
gene silencing effects on differentiation of myogenic cell lines. Muscle Nerve
44. Wang Y, DeLuca HF. Is the vitamin D receptor
found in muscle? Endocrinology
. 2011; 152 (2): 354–63.
45. Ward KA, Das G, Roberts SA, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of vitamin D
supplementation upon musculoskeletal health in postmenarchal females. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.
2010; 95 (10): 4643–51.
46. Wicherts IS, van Schoor NM, Boeke AJ, et al. Vitamin D
status predicts physical performance and its decline in older persons. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.
2007; 92 (6): 2058–65.
47. Wu S, Liao AP, Xia Y, et al. Vitamin D receptor
negatively regulates bacterial-stimulated NF-kappaB activity in intestine. Am. J. Pathol.
2010; 177 (2): 686–97.
48. Zanello SB, Boland RL, Norman AW. cDNA sequence identity of a vitamin D
–dependent calcium-binding protein in the chick to calbindin D-9K. Endocrinology
. 1995; 136 (6): 2784–7.