A 70-year-old woman presented to the emergency department with acute onset odynophagia after ingestion of a diphenhydramine 25 mg tablet. On initial presentation, she noted spontaneous resolution of her symptoms, tolerated oral intake, and was discharged home with ambulatory follow-up. Five days later, she presented to the gastroenterology clinic with progressive odynophagia, dysphagia with solid foods, and a 24-hour history of fever. She tolerated liquids and oral secretions without issue. Physical examination was unrevealing. A non-contrast computed tomography of the neck and chest identified a metallic foreign body lodged in the esophagus with a possible esophageal perforation at the level of the aortic arch (Figure 1). Esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed a metallic foreign body 20 cm from the mouth (Figure 2). Rat-toothed forceps were used to retrieve the object, which was identified as a medication blister pack containing an intact diphenhydramine 25 mg tablet (Figure 3). Removal of the blister pack revealed a contained esophageal perforation. The patient was treated with empiric ampicillin/sulbactam, intravenous fluid hydration, and nil per os for several days. Follow-up esophagram demonstrated interval healing of the perforation. Her symptoms resolved, and her diet was advanced without complications.
Foreign body ingestion is a relatively common clinical presentation, although less than 1 percent of cases result in gastrointestinal tract perforation. A systematic review identified 15 case reports of gastrointestinal perforation due to medication blister packs, most commonly occurring at the ileum and esophagus. Most patients presented with odynophagia, retrosternal chest pain, abdominal pain, or fever.1 Plain film or barium-contrasted radiographs may be sufficient for diagnosis of a retained blister pack, but computed tomography scan may be more useful to identify the level and extent of injury while visualizing the characteristic appearance of the metallic backing and air-filled capsule containing the medication.2 Complete esophageal perforation has a mortality rate of >20% because of the potential for necrotic mediastinitis. Complete perforation classically requires surgical consultation for primary closure, esophagectomy, or cervical exclusion along with mediastinal or peritoneal washout and antibiosis.3 Alternatively, the use of fully covered self-expandable metal stents has been demonstrated at a case series level for successful treatment of spontaneous, iatrogenic, or other causes of esophageal perforation in select patient populations.4 Alternatively, contained esophageal perforations can be treated with endoscopic retrieval of any inciting foreign body, broad-spectrum antibiotics to prevent mediastinitis, and esophageal rest.5 Follow-up imaging for healing or sequelae is recommended.2
Author contributions: AJ Horton wrote the manuscript. SB Clayton edited the mansucript and is the article guarantor.
Financial disclosure: None to report.
Previous Presentation: This case was presented as a poster at the World Congress of Gastroenterology at ACG 2017 Meeting; October 13–18, 2017; Orlando, Florida.
Informed consent was obtained for this case report.
1. Yao S, Matsui Y, Shiotsu S. An unusual case of duodenal perforation caused by a blister pack: A case report and literature review. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2015;14:129–32.
2. Tai AW, Sodickson A. Foreign body ingestion of blister pill pack causing small bowel obstruction. Emerg Radiol. 2007;14:105–8.
3. Brinster CJ, Singhal S, Lee L, Marshall MB, Kaiser LR, Kucharczuk JC. Evolving options in the management of esophageal perforation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77(4):1475–83.
4. Sharma P, Kozarek R. ACG Practice Guidelines: Role of esophageal stents in benign and malignant diseases. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010(2):258.
5. Sudo T, Sueyoshi S, Fujita H, et al. Esophageal perforation caused by a press through pack. Dis Esophagus. 2003;26:169–72.