Letters to the Editor
To the Editor:
The article by Dr. Alam and colleagues1 based on a comparison of the rate and nature of offences that received disciplinary action between North American medical graduates (NAMGs) and international medical graduates (IMGs) was of interest to me as an IMG. The authors offered an explanation for causal criteria of disciplinary actions, including discrimination, language barriers, and cultural differences, all of which include certain variability. Other contributing factors not discussed by Dr. Alam and colleagues could include socioeconomic criteria, which could be due to transition periods characterized by no income, no housing, a totally new environment, isolation, and other challenges faced by IMGs,2 which could cause mental stress leading to poor performance and, ultimately, disciplinary action. Additional issues such as heavy workload, which can lead to adverse outcomes, like emotional exhaustion, physical fatigue, and cognitive weariness, affect IMGs and NAMGs alike and can negatively affect quality of care.3
Considering the limitations of the data, the authors were unable to determine when the physicians in their sample began practicing in Canada. Further, there was no discussion of information bias; that is, Alam and colleagues did not explain the main causes of the disciplinary ac tions, nor any actions IMGs took to remedy the situations. It would have been helpful to report location of training, which could have influenced the results. If physicians were trained according to Canadian requirements, that might affect the findings as well. Other studies have described confounding adjustments for disciplinary actions.
Newly qualified NAMGs and IMGs alike improve their skills through the organizational culture of training environment along with regular training, as they are skilled in medicine but unable to look after patients’ safety and care.4 The standard of care can get better through different strategies like orientation programs, through which practical challenges are overcome for both IMGs and NAMGs.5 Additionally, mentorship to all graduates through teaching, supervision, guidance, and regular performance assessment allows IMGs to integrate more easily into their new communities,6 which alleviates transitional challenges. Particular courses designed to meet the needs of IMGs with respect to overcoming barriers like language, culture, socialization, and hospital environment can also help.7 Alam and colleagues should have explored these and other potential contributors to their findings.
Sadia Hyder, MSc
Research student, Memorial University of Newfoundland Faculty of Medicine, St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada; firstname.lastname@example.org.
1. Alam A, Matelski JJ, Goldberg HR, Liu JJ, Klemensberg J, Bell CM. The characteristics of international medical graduates who have been disciplined by professional regulatory colleges in Canada: A retrospective cohort study. Acad Med. 2017;92:244–249.
2. Chen PG, Curry LA, Bernheim SM, Berg D, Gozu A, Nunez-Smith M. Professional challenges of non-U.S.-born international medical graduates and recommendations for support during residency training. Acad Med. 2011;86:1383–1388.
3. Shirom A, Nirel N, Vinokur AD. Overload, autonomy, and burnout as predictors of physicians’ quality of care. J Occup Health Psychol. 2006;11:328–342.
4. Aron DC, Headrick LA. Educating physicians prepared to improve care and safety is no accident: It requires a systematic approach. Qual Saf Health Care. 2002;11:168–173.
5. Harris A, Delany C. International medical graduates in transition. Clin Teach. 2013;10:328–332.
6. Maudsley RF. Assessment of international medical graduates and their integration into family practice: The Clinician Assessment for Practice Program. Acad Med. 2008;83:309–315.
7. Hoekje BJ. Medical discourse and ESP courses for international medical graduates (IMGs). Engl Specif Purposes. 2007;26(3):327–343.