Journal Article: PDF OnlyAnonymity and pseudonymity in whistleblowing to the U.S. Office of Research IntegrityPrice, A R Author Information Division of Research Investigations, Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD 20852, USA. Created Date: 25 June 1998; Completed Date: 25 June 1998; Revised Date: 02 August 2002 Academic Medicine 73(5):p 467-72, May 1998. Free Abstract Given the concerns expressed by members of the academic and legal community about whether (and how) to handle anonymous and pseudonymous allegations of scientific misconduct, this paper summaries the experiences of the Office of Research Integrity and its predecessor from 1989 through 1997. Although the record shows that research institutions and the ORI have treated such allegations seriously, the fraction of complainants to the ORI who remain anonymous is small (8% of 986 allegations); few anonymous complaints are sufficiently substantive to be pursued (4% of the 357 formal cases opened in the ORI); and only 1 of these 13 cases resulted in an ORI finding of scientific misconduct. © 1998 Association of American Medical Colleges
