Ultrasound Quarterly

Skip Navigation LinksHome > March 2014 - Volume 30 - Issue 1 > ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Pretreatment Evaluation and Fo...
Ultrasound Quarterly:
doi: 10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000068
ACR Appropriateness Criteria

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Pretreatment Evaluation and Follow-Up of Endometrial Cancer

Lalwani, Neeraj MD*; Dubinsky, Theodore MD*; Javitt, Marcia C. MD; Gaffney, David K. MD, PhD; Glanc, Phyllis MD§; Elshaikh, Mohamed A. MD; Kim, Young Bae MD; Lee, Larissa J. MD#; Pannu, Harpreet K. MD**; Royal, Henry D. MD††; Shipp, Thomas D. MD‡‡; Siegel, Cary Lynn MD§§; Simpson, Lynn MD∥∥; Wahl, Andrew O. MD¶¶; Wolfson, Aaron H. MD##; Zelop, Carolyn M. MD***

Collapse Box


Abstract: Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic and the fourth most common malignancy in women in the United States. Cross-sectional imaging plays a vital role in pretreatment assessment of endometrial cancers and should be viewed as a complementary tool for surgical evaluation and planning of these patients. Although transvaginal US remains the preferred examination for the screening purposes, MRI has emerged as the modality of choice for the staging of endometrial cancer and imaging assessment of recurrence or treatment response. A combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion weighted MRI provides the highest accuracy for the staging. Both CT and MRI perform equivalently for assessing nodal involvement or distant metastasis. PET-CT is more appropriate for assessing lymphadenopathy in high-grade FDG-avid tumors or for clinically suspected recurrence after treatment. An appropriate use and guidelines of imaging techniques in diagnosis, staging, and detection of endometrial cancer and treatment of recurrent disease are reviewed.

The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria® are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every two years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.

© 2014 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins



Article Tools


Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.