Skip Navigation LinksHome > March 2014 - Volume 29 - Issue 2 > Dual-energy Computed Tomography in the Assessment of Vascula...
Journal of Thoracic Imaging:
doi: 10.1097/RTI.0000000000000061
Original Articles

Dual-energy Computed Tomography in the Assessment of Vascular and Parenchymal Enhancement in Suspected Pulmonary Hypertension

Ameli-Renani, Seyed MBBS, FRCR*; Ramsay, Laurie BM*; Bacon, Jenny L. BM, MRCP; Rahman, Farzana MBBS, FRCR*; Nair, Arjun MBChB, FRCR*; Smith, Veronica MBChB, MRCP; Baskerville, Kate BSc*; Devaraj, Anand MD, FRCR*; Madden, Brendan MD, FRCP; Vlahos, Ioannis MRCP, FRCR*

Collapse Box

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate quantitative differences in central pulmonary artery (PA) and pulmonary global and regional enhancement in patients with and without pulmonary hypertension (PH) using dual-energy computed tomography (DECT).

Materials and Methods: We retrospectively studied 391 thoracic DECT studies and identified 89 patients with PA pressure (PAP) data and a pulmonary angiogram. PH was defined as a mean PAP of ≥25 mm Hg on right heart catheterization (RHC) (n=19) or a systolic PAP of ≥40 mm Hg on echocardiography (n=20). PH absence was defined by entirely normal echocardiography or RHC (n=50). PA enhancement (PAenh) was calculated from DECT iodine images. Volumetric enhancement of each whole lung (WLenh), 6 standard lung regions (RLenh), and 24 two-dimensional standardized regions of interest (ROIenh) was performed in each patient using pulmonary blood volume analysis.

Results: Mean PAenh was greater in PH patients compared with controls (272 vs. 252 HU, P<0.05), with a reciprocal reduction in mean WLenh (27 vs. 32 HU, P<0.01). Mean ROIenh (n=2058) confirmed lower parenchymal enhancement in PH (27 vs. 32 HU, P<0.001), with greater mean ROIenh standard deviation (10.5 vs. 9.3, P<0.001). Mean intrapatient pulmonary enhancement variability was greater in PH patients than in controls for 6 RLenh (variance 37 vs. 22, P=0.02) and 24 ROIenh measures (variance 188 vs. 130, P=0.04). RLenh and ROIenh variance correlated with RHC pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) (r=0.44, 0.48; P=0.04, 0.03, respectively). A ratio of PAenh/WLenh distinguished PH from non-PH patients (10.9 vs. 8.4, P<0.001) and correlated best with PVR (r=0.59, P=0.004).

Conclusions: PH patients demonstrate increased PAenh with a reciprocal reduction and greater variation in parenchymal enhancement; a DECT ratio of central to parenchymal enhancement correlates with PVR and may help identify PH.

© 2014 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Login

Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.