Skip Navigation LinksHome > July 2013 - Volume 28 - Issue 4 > ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Pulmonary Hypertension
Journal of Thoracic Imaging:
doi: 10.1097/RTI.0b013e31829191b5
Web Exclusive Content-ACR Appropriateness Criteria(R) Review

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Pulmonary Hypertension

Brown, Kathleen MD*; Gutierrez, Antonio J. MD*; Mohammed, Tan-Lucien H. MD; Kirsch, Jacobo MD; Chung, Jonathan H. MD§; Dyer, Debra Sue MD§; Ginsburg, Mark E. MD; Heitkamp, Darel E. MD; Kanne, Jeffrey P. MD#; Kazerooni, Ella A. MD**; Ketai, Loren H. MD††; Parker, J. Anthony MD, PhD‡‡; Ravenel, James G. MD§§; Saleh, Anthony G. MD∥∥; Shah, Rakesh D. MD¶¶; Steiner, Robert M. MD##; Suh, Robert D. MD*

Collapse Box

Abstract

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) may be idiopathic or related to a variety of diseases. The diagnosis, accurate assessment of etiology and severity, prognosis, treatment response, and follow-up of PH can be achieved using a diverse set of diagnostic examinations. In this review, the role of imaging in the evaluation of PH as suggested by the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria® Expert Panel on Thoracic Imaging has been discussed. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria® are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The development and review of the guidelines include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.

Copyright © American College of Radiology. Reprinted with permission.

Login

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.