The Neurologist

Skip Navigation LinksHome > May 2009 - Volume 15 - Issue 3 > Telemedicine Versus Telephone for Remote Emergency Stroke Co...
Neurologist:
doi: 10.1097/NRL.0b013e3181a4b79c
Critically Appraised Topics

Telemedicine Versus Telephone for Remote Emergency Stroke Consultations: A Critically Appraised Topic

Capampangan, Dan J. MD*; Wellik, Kay E. MLS, AHIP†; Bobrow, Bentley J. MD‡§; Aguilar, Maria I. MD¶; Ingall, Timothy J. MD, PhD¶; Kiernan, Terri-Ellen NP¶; Wingerchuk, Dean M. MD, MSc, FRCP(C)*; Demaerschalk, Bart M. MD, MSc, FRCP(C)¶

Collapse Box

Abstract

Background: The rate of patients being treated with thrombolytic therapy is low, in part, due to a shortage of vascular neurologists, especially in rural communities. Two-way audio-video communication through telemedicine has been demonstrated to be a reliable method to assess neurologic deficits due to stroke and maybe more efficacious in determining thrombolytic therapy eligibility than telephone-only consultation.

Objective: To determine the efficacy of telemedicine versus telephone-only consultations for decision making in acute stroke situations.

Methods: The objective was addressed through the development of a structured, critically appraised topic. Participants included consultant and resident neurologists, clinical epidemiologists, medical librarian, and clinical content experts in the fields of vascular neurology, emergency medicine, and telemedicine. Participants started with a clinical scenario and a structured question, devised search strategies, located and compiled the best evidence, performed a critical appraisal, synthesized the results, summarized the evidence, provided commentary, and declared bottom-line conclusions.

Results: A single randomized, blinded, prospective trial comparing telephone-only consultations to telemedicine consultations for acute stroke was selected and appraised. Correct acute stroke treatment decisions were made more often in the telemedicine group versus the telephone-only group (98% vs. 82%, [number needed to assess = 6]). Stroke telemedicine when compared with telephone-only consultations was more sensitive (100% vs. 58%), more specific (98% vs. 92%), had a more favorable positive likelihood ratio (LR: 41 vs. 7) and negative likelihood ratio (LR: 0 vs. 0.5), and had higher predictive values (positive predictive value 94% vs. 76%, and negative predictive value 100% vs. 84%) for the determination of thrombolysis eligibility.

Conclusion: Stroke telemedicine when compared with telephone-only consultations is an effective method to determine thrombolysis eligibility for acute stroke patients who do not have immediate access to a stroke neurologist.

© 2009 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Login

Article Tools

Share

Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.