Share this article on:

Symptom: Failed Cochlear Implant

Djalilian, Hamid R. MD

doi: 10.1097/01.HJ.0000525532.02173.88
Clinical Consultation

Dr. Djalilian is the director of neurotology and skull base surgery and a professor of otolaryngology and biomedical engineering at the University of California, Irvine.

A 60-year-old woman comes in to discuss the revision of her left cochlear implant. She had a re-implant in 1990 and a revision in 2014. She recalls getting limited benefit from the implant prior to the 2014 surgery. However, she still did not experience any improvement after the revision, and her minimal speech understanding gradually diminished. She wants to know her options and their benefits. A CT scan of the patient's temporal bones is on the right.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Diagnosis: Kinked Electrode

Poor performance after cochlear implantation is uncommon. When it does occur, the problem is often related to the device. Overall, about five to seven percent of children and one to three percent of adults will experience device failure, which can be categorized as a hard or soft failure. Since the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) considers cochlear implants class III high-risk devices, all failed devices are returned. In fact, manufacturers need to track every device from the time it is shipped out until it is returned due to a device failure or when the patient passes away. For an explanted device, the manufacturer needs to perform an analysis, then submit a report to the FDA and the cochlear implant team that removed the device.

Back to Top | Article Outline

HARD FAILURES

A hard failure occurs when the device completely fails to function. This can be an electronic malfunction resulting from a blow to the device or from a loss of hermiticity, particularly when body liquids enter the device, causing a short circuit. Hard failures can also occur when electrodes are shaved off due to the device's micro-motions. This can also happen when there is significant kinking of the electrode during the insertion process, which can eventually lead to serious electrode damage. Prior to explantation, an integrity test is performed by the manufacturer representative. If a hard failure is confirmed, explantation and re-implantation are planned.

Back to Top | Article Outline

SOFT FAILURE

A soft failure is when a device does not fail the manufacturer's integrity test but exhibits some problems. When a user feels that the device is not functioning as well as it used to, a thorough investigation of the implant and external components are performed by the audiology team. This includes switching the cables, using different programs on the processor, and having the patient demonstrate how to use the device. Once a technical issue has been ruled out, the device manufacturer is contacted to perform an integrity test on the device. Integrity tests include a thorough assessment of the internal receiver and stimulator and an evaluation of the stimulation rate and intra-cochlear electrodes using common ground testing. Once these processes are found to be normal, imaging is obtained to evaluate the position of the electrode.

In our clinic, we prefer the use of a CT scan, which can determine the exact location of the electrode and the number of contact points inside and outside of the cochlea. Some clinics use x-rays to evaluate the electrode's position. While x-rays show if the electrode is curled in the cochlea, they do not show if some of the electrodes are outside of the cochlea. In addition, the electrode can rarely be curled in the superior semicircular canal, which can be misinterpreted as a correct placement. The primary advantage of the x-ray over the CT is the lower radiation exposure for the patient. If the imaging shows that the electrode is fully within the cochlea, a final check is done with the manufacturer representative to confirm if the device is a soft failure. After this confirmation, the revision process can begin.

Back to Top | Article Outline

EXPLANTATION AND REIMPLANTATION

In surgery, great care should be taken to protect the explanted device. If the device is damaged, detailed notes of the intra-operative damage should be made to inform the manufacturer of the damages before and during the surgery. The explanted device, along with the notes, are placed in a special container and sent to the manufacturer for testing.

In our practice, most of the surgical process is generally performed under a microscope to prevent any inadvertent damage to the cochlear implant. After an initial incision, the wound is dissected slowly under the microscope until the electrode is found. In children, this process is more difficult because of the regrowth of the mastoid cortex. Sometimes the implant electrode may weave in and out of the regrown mastoid cortex in a child. The electrode and device body should be dissected gently. The device body and ground electrode (if present) are removed, and a new device body is placed in the subcutaneous pocket. The electrode is then removed from the cochlea and immediately replaced with the electrode of the new device. This process must be done quickly to make sure that new electrode is placed into the cochlea's fibrous pocket, which contained the previous electrode, before it collapses. Thus, the new electrode must be placed as soon as the explanted electrode is removed. The surgery is followed by intraoperative testing with impedance and neural response telemetry.

The patient's CT scan showed that the electrode was primarily in the basal turn and had not penetrated the second turn (Fig. 2). There appeared to be an unusual bend or kink in the electrode in the basal turn. Four to five electrodes were outside of the cochlea (Fig. 3). We decided to advance the electrode further into the patient's cochlea, or replace the device if this is not possible.

Intraoperatively, we found that the electrode was very difficult to advance in this patient. As such, we decided to remove it, as the patient's CT scan was highly suspicious of a kinked electrode. With some force, we were able to remove the electrode, which indeed turned out to be kinked (Fig. 4). We then attempted to place a slim straight (an electrode with a smaller diameter), but it would not pass through the fibrous scar tissue that developed at the junction of the basal and second turns. Finally, we performed a scala vestibule cochleostomy and placed the electrode without difficulty. We later obtained a good neural response telemetry.

Back to Top | Article Outline

iPad Exclusive!

Back to Top | Article Outline

BONUS VIDEOS: VISUAL DIAGNOSIS

Read this month's Clinical Consultation case, then watch the accompanying videos from Hamid R. Djalilian, MD, to review the patient's imaging for yourself.

* Video 1. Axial CT (horizontal) of the left temporal bone showing the kinked electrode in the basal turn.

* Video 2. Axial CT of the right temporal bone demonstrating the cochlear implant electrode in the cochlea reaching the second turn.

* Video 3. Coronal CT of the right temporal bone showing the normal penetration of the electrode as seen on imaging.

* Video 4. Coronal (vertical) CT of the left temporal bone showing the kinked electrode in the cochlea.

* Video 5. Sagittal (outside in) CT of the right temporal bone showing the normal configuration of the electrode and its relationship to the facial nerve.

* Video 6. Sagittal (outside in) CT of the left temporal bone showing the electrode kinking in the basal turn.

These exclusive features are only available in the September iPad issue.

Download the free The Hearing Journal app today at http://bit.ly/AppHearingJ .

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.