Home Current Issue Previous Issues For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > September 2005 - Volume 20 - Issue 3 > Five-Strand Hamstring Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruct...
You could be reading the full-text of this article now...
If you have access to this article through your institution, you can view this article in OvidSP.
Techniques in Orthopaedics:
September 2005 - Volume 20 - Issue 3 - pp 192-193
Articles

Five-Strand Hamstring Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Presentation of a New Technique With Better Stability at 7- to 9-Year Follow Up Than 4 Strand

Prodromos, Chadwick M.D.; Joyce, Brian B.A.

Collapse Box

Abstract

Summary: Even in the highest stability four-strand hamstring (4HS) or BTB ACL reconstruction series, KT 1000 side-to-side differences of ≥2mm are generally seen in at least a third of all knees. We hypothesized that a stronger, stiffer five-strand HS graft using three-strand-Semitendinosus/two-strand-Gracilis, would result in higher stability rates than 4HS using two-strand-Semitendinosus/two-strand-Gracilis.

Materials and Methods: 20 consecutive patients had 5HS ACL reconstruction using 3ST/2Gr. 18 returned for evaluation 89-112 months postoperatively. Results were compared with a previously reported cohort of 133 knees reconstructed by the same surgeon using four-strand HS grafts evaluated at 24-104 months postoperatively. Both had suspensory-cortical- femoral and whip-stitch-cortical-screw tibial fixation. KT-1000, Noyes, Lysholm and SANE ratings were performed.

Results: All 5HS and 4HS knees were clinically stable, with no graft failures or reinjuries. Average KT-1000 side-to-side difference was 0.44mm for 5HS vs. 1.0mm for 4HS for (p = 0.01). A reconstructed knee laxity increase of ≤1mm versus the normal knee was found in 89% of 5HS vs. 66% of 4HS (p = 0.03); of 2-3mm in 11% 5HS vs. 31% 4HS; of 4mm in 0% 5HS vs. 3% 4HS; and of >4mm in 0% 5HS and 4HS. 5HS/4HS clinical ratings were high and did not significantly differ.

Conclusions: 5HS ACLR had higher stability than a high stability 4HS cohort. Since sufficient ST graft is usually available to fashion a 3strand-ST instead of 2strand-ST graft to combine with the 2strand-Gr, we believe 5HS is preferable to 4HS for ACL reconstruction, especially for double bundle techniques.

© 2005 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Login




Help

Forgot Password?

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.