HPV 6/11, 16, 18 Seroprevalence in Men in Two US Cities

Dunne, Eileen F. MD*; Nielson, Carrie M. PHD†‡; Hagensee, Michael E. MD§; Papenfuss, Mary R. MPH¶; Harris, Robin B. PHD‡; Herrel, Nicholas BS§; Gourlie, Jennifer BS§; Abrahamsen, Martha MPH¶; Markowitz, Lauri E. MD*; Giuliano, Anna R. PHD¶

doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181bc094b

Background: A vaccine to prevent human papillomavirus (HPV) 6, HPV 11, HPV 16, or HPV 18 and associated diseases is licensed for females, and it may be licensed for men in the future. There are limited data on HPV 6/11, 16, and/or 18 seroprevalence in men.

Methods: A total of 490 men aged 18 to 40 years were enrolled in a study of HPV in men in Tucson, AZ, and Tampa, FL. Enrolled men completed a self-administered questionnaire, and HPV serology was performed using HPV 6/11, 16, and 18 VLP assays.

Results: Overall, seroprevalence to HPV 16 was 12.1%, HPV 6/11 was 9.7%, and to HPV 18 was 5.4%. Seroprevalence to HPV 6/11, 16, and/or 18 was 21% and was highest among 35 to 40 year olds (48%); prevalence in this age group was significantly higher compared to the 18 to 24 year olds (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 6.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.7, 12.8). Independent predictors of seropositivity to HPV 6/11, 16, and/or 18 were older age, greater number of female sex partners in the past 3 months, and current smoking.

Conclusions: HPV vaccine-type seroprevalence was highest in 35 to 40 year old men. These data on the epidemiology of HPV seroprevalence in men are useful for discussions regarding recommendations for HPV vaccine if licensed for use in men.

A study of men in 2 cities in the United States found HPV 6/11, HPV 16, or HPV 18 seroprevalence was associated with older age, number of sex partners, and current smoking.

From the *Division of STD Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA; †Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; ‡Arizona Cancer Center and Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, Tucson, AZ; §Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA; and ¶H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida

The authors thank the staff members of the University of Arizona Health Research Clinic, Tucson; the Men’s Research Clinic at Lifetime Cancer Screening and Prevention Center, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa; and the Pima County Theresa Lee Health Center, Tucson. The authors are also grateful to Digene Corporation (Gaithersburg, MD) for donating reagents and supplies. The authors would also like to thank Maya Sternberg for assistance with data analysis, Katherine Stone for the assistance with the concept and study design, and Jim Braxton for assistance with data analysis.

Supported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention through the Association of American Medical Colleges, grants U36/CCU319276, AAMC ID number MM-0579–03/03. Publication and report contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the AAMC or the CDC.

Correspondence: Eileen F. Dunne, MD, 1600 Clifton Rd, MS E-02, Atlanta, GA 30030. E-mail: dde9@cdc.gov.

Received for publication January 29, 2009, and accepted May 5, 2009.

Article Outline

Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is one of the most common sexually transmitted infections and causes cancers in men and women. Over 40 HPV types are known to infect the genital tract, at least 13 of which are considered oncogenic.1 Although infection is most often asymptomatic and transient, persistent infection with oncogenic HPV types is strongly associated with cervical and other anogenital cancers and a subset of head and neck cancers in both men and women.2 Nononcogenic HPV types cause genital warts, other benign lesions, and recurrent respiratory papillomatosis. Serologic assessments measuring antibodies to HPV provide a measure of cumulative exposure to HPV, as antibodies may indicate past infection among those who have no history or current signs of HPV disease. However, at least one important limitation to serologic assessment is that many people with incident or persistent infection do not develop antibodies; in one study, between 54% and 69% of women were found to develop type specific HPV antibodies 18 months after incident HPV infection3; In addition, HPV antibodies may wane over time.3

In the United States, the quadrivalent HPV vaccine is recommended for girls 11 and 12 years of age and girls/women through age 26 years can be vaccinated if they have not received or completed the vaccination series.4 Clinical trials of an HPV vaccine are being completed in men, and results may soon support FDA approval for use in men.5 Although studies have been published on HPV-16 seroprevalence in men in several countries and from different settings including STD clinics, general population, and university clinics,6 few studies have evaluated HPV 6, HPV 11, HPV 16, and/or HPV 18 seroprevalence.7,8,9 Although there are limitations to using seroprevalence for evidence of exposure to vaccine type HPV infection, seroepidemiology in men from various populations can provide important evidence of exposure to these HPV types by age; this information may prove useful in the consideration of HPV vaccine recommendations in men.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Men aged 18 to 40 years in 2 cities, Tucson, AZ, and Tampa, FL, were enrolled into a cross-sectional study of HPV infection, as described in detail by Nielson et al.10 Men were eligible to enroll if they had had sexual intercourse with a woman within the past year, had no history of genital warts, penile, or anal cancer, and no current symptoms or diagnosis of a sexually transmitted disease. All participants gave informed consent, and all procedures were approved by the University of Arizona Human Subjects Protection Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Institutional Review Board, United States Department of Defense, and the University of South Florida Institutional Review Board.

Back to Top | Article Outline

HPV Serum Antibodies

The study clinician collected 13 mL of venous blood from enrolled men. These specimens were aliquoted and stored at −20°C. HPV antibody status was assessed using techniques previously described. Antibodies against HPV types 6/11 were detected by a combined assay, and HPV 16 and HPV 18 by individual assays performed at Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center. Monoclonal antibodies specific for conformational epitopes on the relevant HPV type were used to detect antibodies by Capture ELISA. The monoclonal antibodies were H11.B10-HPV 6 and 11 (for HPV 6/11), H16.V5-HPV-16 (for HPV 16), and H18.J4-HPV-18 (for HPV 18). Monoclonal antibodies were provided by Dr. N. Christensen (Pennsylvania State Medical Center, Hershey, PA). Participant sera were tested at a 1:100 dilution and tested in triplicate with antigen (HPV capsids and in triplicate without capsids). The log transformation of the median of 3 wells with capsids was subtracted from the median of the 3 wells without capsids to provide the adjusted optical density (aOD). The serological cutpoint was determined from tested negative control sera (children less than 10 years old with no prior history of any warts) and using the average plus 2 standard deviations as the cutpoint.

Use of the negative control sera was approved by Louisiana State University Protocol Detection of antibodies against HPV and by the Institutional Review Board at the Children’s Hospital, where the control-sample blood was collected.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Statistical Analyses

The cutpoint for serum HPV-16 antibody positivity was an aOD of 0.134, for HPV-6/11 antibody positivity was an aOD of 0.367, and for HPV-18 antibody positivity was an aOD of 0.309. All analyses used the cut point to describe seroprevalence. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the associations between demographic and behavioral characteristics of men and the outcome of HPV 6/11, 16, and/or 18 seropositivity. A multivariable model was generated starting with all variables with a P value ≤0.2 in bivariate analysis and then using a backwards elimination approach. All analyses were completed using SAS version 9.0 (Cary, NC).

Back to Top | Article Outline


Of 499 men enrolled in the study who returned for sample collection at the second visit, 498 (99.7%) had results from HPV 6/11, HPV 16, or HPV 18 antibody testing; 462 (92.8%) men had information on age and other covariates and were included in this analysis.

The 462 men were primarily recruited from Tucson, AZ (77.5%), were aged 18 to 24 years (49.8%), predominantly non-Hispanic (82.9%), white (69.9%), and single (70.6%). Most (84.0%) men were circumcised as reported by the provider.

Overall, seroprevalence to HPV 16 was 12.1%, to HPV 6/11 was 9.7%, and to HPV 18 was 5.4%. Ninety-five (20.6%) men were seropositive to HPV 6/11, HPV 16, and/or HPV 18; 13 (2.6%) men were seropositive to both HPV 16 and HPV 18, 3 (0.6%) were seropositive to both HPV 6/11 and HPV 18, and 5 (1%) were seropositive to HPV 6/11 and HPV 16; only 5 (1%) men were seropositive to all types (data not shown).

Seropositivity increased by age group, and was significantly associated with increasing age group for HPV 16 and HPV 18 (Fig. 1). Overall, HPV 16 seropositivity was 5.7% among 18 to 24 year olds and 35.4% among 35 to 40 year olds.

Demographic and behavioral characteristics significantly associated (P < 0.05) with seropositivity to HPV 6/11, HPV 16, and/or HPV 18 in bivariate analysis included age group, race, marital status, history of STD, greater lifetime number of sex partners, greater number of sex partners in the previous 3 months, and current smoking (Table 1). Only 6 men had a wart diagnosis in clinic, and this was not associated with seropositivity to HPV 6/11, HPV 16, and/or HPV 18.

In multivariable analysis, factors independently associated with HPV 6/11, HPV 16, and/or HPV 18 seropositivity were older age (35 to 40 year olds vs. 18 to 25 year olds, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 6.8 (95% CI, 3.7, 12.8), greater number of female partners in the last 3 months (1 vs. 0, aOR: 4.5 [95% CI, 1.6, 12.6] or >1 vs. 0, aOR: 5.3 [95% CI, 1.8, 15.8]) and current smoking (aOR: 1.9 [(95% CI, 1.1, 3.2]) (Table 2).

Back to Top | Article Outline


In this study of men who had sex with a woman in the past year, 21% were seropositive to HPV 6/11, 16 and/or 18, and seropositivity was highest in the oldest age group (35–40 years). Few men were seropositive to all 4 HPV vaccine-types.

Most studies of HPV seroprevalence in men have reported information on HPV-16. HPV-16 seroprevalence ranges from 3% to 52% in the United States, depending on the population evaluated.6,12–15 Studies in STD clinics have described HPV seroprevalence of 18.7% to 38%,6,14 while studies of the general population have found lower estimates. An assessment in a representative sample of the United States population found that HPV 16 seroprevalence among men was 7.9% (95% CI 6.4, 9.8).12 In a subsequent study using a different serologic assay, HPV 16 seroprevalence was 5.1% (95% CI 4.3, 6.1).9 The seroprevalence in our study (12.1%) was higher than the general population estimates but lower than that found in STD clinics.

Few studies have published information on HPV 6, 11, and 18 seroprevalence in large population based samples,7,8,9 and among men.6,7,9,11–15 Our study found that HPV 6/11 seropositivity was 9.7% and HPV 18 seropositivity was 5.4%. A recently published assessment in a representative sample of the U.S. population evaluated seropositivity to HPV 6, 11, 16 and 18 among male and female participants.9 This study found HPV 6 seropositivity among males was 6.3%, HPV 11 seropositivity was 2.0%, and HPV 18 seropositivity was 1.5%;9 peak seropositivity to HPV 6, 11, 16 or 18 was 18% among 50–59 year olds and varied by HPV type.9 Another study from Australia reported HPV 6 seropositivity among males was 9.1%, HPV 11 seropositivity was 5.2%, and HPV 18 seropositivity was 3.9%. Our study found higher seropositivity compared with the population-based study in the U.S., although it is difficult to compare as these assessments used different serologic methods.

Our study found that current smoking, older age and greater numbers of recent sex partners were independently associated with vaccine-type HPV seropositivity. Sexual behavior and older age have been consistently associated with HPV seroprevalence in men11–16; most studies have evaluated these factors in association with HPV 16 seroprevalence. The finding that recent rather than lifetime sex partners was associated with seropositivity could suggest recent exposure is important for antibody detection in men or that HPV antibody wanes over time. Stone et al reported increasing years of sexual activity and younger age at sexual debut were independently associated with HPV 16 seropositivity.12 Stone et al also reported that older age was a risk factor for HPV 16 seropositivity with peak seroprevalence among men 30 to 39 years of age. Finally, smoking is a well described risk factor for incident and persistent HPV infection, as well as cervical precancers,16,17 but has not been consistently described as a risk factor for HPV seropositivity.

There are several limitations to our findings. Our population included men who were sexually active with at least 1 lifetime sex partner from 2 cities, and who had no current sexually transmitted infection and no history of genital warts; this cohort of men may not represent all men in the general population. Also, this assessment was cross-sectional and could not assess determinants of development of antibodies to HPV 6/11, HPV 16, or HPV 18 after exposure. Finally, our study was restricted to men aged 18 to 40 years, therefore we could not characterize seropositivity in men younger than 18 years or older than 40 years. A limitation in interpretation of all HPV seropositivity data are that seropostivity may underestimate cumulative exposure as antibodies may wane over time, and not all exposures result in seroconversion.

In summary, this study found that many sexually active men, especially with increasing age, had evidence of exposure to at least 1 vaccine-type HPV infection. Few men had antibodies to all 4 vaccine types. This information could be useful when considering HPV vaccine use in men. Recently presented data suggest high efficacy of the HPV vaccine for prevention of persistent infection and external genital lesions in men.5 As in females, a prophylactic HPV vaccine would optimally be given to males before sexual debut, before exposure to HPV is highly probable. Ongoing natural history studies in men, and seroprevalence from a nationally representative survey of men in the United States will also contribute to the considerations of HPV vaccine in men.9

Back to Top | Article Outline


1. Munoz N, Bosch FX, de Sanjose S, et al. Epidemiologic classification of human papillomavirus types associated with cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 2003; 348:518–527.
2. Parkin DM. The global health burden of infection-associated cancers in the year 2002. Int J Cancer 2006; 118:3030–3044.
3. Carter JJ, Koutsky LA, Hughes JP, et al. Comparison of human papillomavirus types 16, 18, and 6 capsid antibody responses following incident infection. J Infect Dis 2000; 181:1911–1919.
4. Markowitz LE, Dunne EF, Saraiya M, et al. Quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine: Recommendations of the advisory committee on immunization practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep 2007; 56:1–24.
5. Giuliano A, Palefsky J; on behalf of the male quadrivalent HPV vaccine efficacy trial study group. The efficacy of quadrivalent HPV (Types 6/11/16/18) vaccine in reducing the incidence of HPV infection and HPV-related genital disease in young men. Abstract presented at: EUROGIN; 2008; Paris, France.
6. Dunne EF, Nielson CM, Stone KM, et al. Prevalence of HPV infection among men: A systematic review of the literature. J Infect Dis 2006; 194:1044–1057.
7. Newall AT, Brotherton JM, Quinn HE, et al. Population seroprevalence of human papillomavirus types 6, 11, 16, and 18 in men, women, and children in Australia. Clin Infect Dis 2008; 46:1647–1655.
8. Jit M, Vyse A, Borrow R, et al. Prevalence of human papillomavirus antibodies in young female subjects in England. Br J Cancer 2007; 97:989–991.
9. Markowitz Le, Sternberg LM, Dunne EF, McQuillan G, et al. Seroprevalence of human papillomavirus types 6, 11, 16 and 18 in the United States: National Health and Nutrician Examination Survey 2003–2004. J Infect Dis 2009; 105:9–67.
10. Nielson CM, Flores R, Harris RB, et al. Human papillomavirus prevalence and type distribution in male anogenital sites and semen. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007; 16:1107–1114.
11. Slavinsky J, Kissinger P, Burger L, et al. Seroepidemiology of low and high oncogenic risk types of human papillomavirus in a predominantly male cohort of STD clinic patients. Int J STD AIDS 2001; 12:516–523.
12. Stone KM, Karem KL, Sternberg MR, et al. Seroprevalence of human papillomavirus type 16 infection in the United States. J Infect Dis 2002; 186:1396–1402.
13. Hagensee ME, Kiviat N, Critchlow CW, et al. Seroprevalence of human papillomavirus types 6 and 16 capsid antibodies in homosexual men. J Infect Dis 1997; 176:625–631.
14. Thompson DL, Douglas JM Jr, Foster M, et al. Seroepidemiology of infection with human papillomavirus 16, in men and women attending sexually transmitted disease clinics in the United States. J Infect Dis 2004; 190:1563–1574.
15. Svare EI, Kjaer SK, Nonenmacher B, et al. Seroreactivity to human papillomavirus type 16 virus-like particles is lower in high-risk men than in high-risk women. J Infect Dis 1997; 176:876–883.
16. Strickler HD, Kirk GD, Figueroa JP, et al. HPV 16 antibody prevalence in Jamaica and the United States reflects differences in cervical cancer rates. Int J Cancer 1999; 80:339–344.
17. Castellsague X, Munoz N. Chapter 3: Cofactors in human papillomavirus carcinogenesis–role of parity, oral contraceptives, and tobacco smoking. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2003; 31:20–28.
© Copyright 2009 American Sexually Transmitted Diseases Association