Skip Navigation LinksHome > September 2009 - Volume 36 - Issue 9 > Phase 1 Dose-Ranging Safety Trial of Lactobacillus crispatus...
Sexually Transmitted Diseases:
doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181a74924
Articles

Phase 1 Dose-Ranging Safety Trial of Lactobacillus crispatus CTV-05 for the Prevention of Bacterial Vaginosis

Hemmerling, Anke MD, MPH*; Harrison, William MPH*; Schroeder, Adrienne BA*; Park, Jeanna BA*; Korn, Abner MD*; Shiboski, Stephen PHD†; Cohen, Craig R. MD, MPH*

Free Access
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

From the Departments of *Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences; and †Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco

The authors thank all participants, the study clinicians performing the clinical visits, the staff of the CTSI Clinical Research Center at the San Francisco General Hospital, the data management team at DF/Net Research in Seattle, and the study sponsor Osel Inc. of Santa Clara, CA.

Supported by a grant from Osel Inc. Jeanna Park was supported by the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation Clinical Research Fellowship at UCSF. In addition, this study was supported by grant number UL1 RR024131-01 from the National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and NIH Roadmap for Medical Research.

Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of NCRR or NIH. Information on NCRR is available at http://www.ncrr.nih.gov/. Information on Re-engineering the Clinical Research Enterprise can be obtained from http://nihroadmap.nih.gov/clinicalresearch/overview-translational.asp.

Correspondence: Anke Hemmerling, MD, MPH, UCSF Department of Ob/Gyn and RS, 50 Beale St, Suite 1200, San Francisco, CA 94105. E-mail: ahemmerling@globalhealth.ucsf.edu.

Received for publication October 15, 2008, and accepted March 26, 2009.

Collapse Box

Abstract

Background: Bacterial vaginosis is a very common vaginal infection. The lack of endogenous lactobacilli and overgrowth of pathogens facilitate numerous gynecological complications.

Methods: A phase I dose-ranging safety trial tested the safety, tolerability, and acceptability of Lactobacillus crispatus CTV-05 (LACTIN-V) administered by vaginal applicator. Twelve healthy volunteers were enrolled in 3 blocks of 4 (5 × 108, 1 × 109, and 2 × 109 cfu/dose). Each block was randomized in a 3:1 ratio of active product to placebo. Participants used study product for 5 consecutive days, returned for follow-up on days 7 and 14, and had phone interviews on days 2 and 35.

Results: All 12 participants took 5 doses and completed study follow-up.

Overall, 45 adverse events (AEs) occurred, of which 31 (69%) were genitourinary (GU) AEs. GU AEs appeared evenly distributed between the 3 treatment blocks and between LACTIN-V and placebo arms. The most common GU AEs were vaginal discharge in 5 subjects (42%), abdominal pain in 4 subjects (33%), metrorrhagia in 4 subjects (33%), vulvovaginitis in 4 subjects (33%), vaginal candidiasis in 3 subjects (25%), and vaginal odor in 3 subjects (25%). Forty-one (91%) AEs were mild (grade 1) in severity. All 4 moderate AEs (grade 2) were unrelated to product use. No grade 3 or 4 AEs or serious adverse events (SAE) occurred. Laboratory parameters and colposcopy findings were within normal limits or clinically insignificant. The product was well-tolerated and accepted.

Conclusion: All 3 dose levels of LACTIN-V appeared to be safe and acceptable in healthy volunteers.

Bacterial vaginosis (BV), characterized by an imbalanced vaginal flora deficient in naturally occurring hydrogen peroxide-producing lactobacilli is one of the most frequent vaginal infections and affects about 15% to 50% of reproductive aged women globally.1–5 Although symptoms of BV consist of a thin, homogeneous discharge and a strong vaginal odor, most women with BV are unaware of their condition. However, BV has been associated with significant gynecologic and obstetric complications including pelvic inflammatory disease,6,7 endometritis,8 and postoperative infections including postpartum endometritis.9,10 Strong associations have also been reported between BV and preterm delivery, miscarriage,11,12 and amniotic fluid infections.13,14 Recent studies have also linked BV with increased susceptibility to HIV infection.4,15–17 Furthermore, 20% to 30% of women with BV relapse within 1 to 3 months after standard antibiotic treatment.18,19 These sequelae clearly justify investigational studies of agents like probiotics20 that may be effective in the improved treatment and/or prevention of BV.

Reconstituting a normal Lactobacillus-predominant vaginal flora has been promoted for many years to provide a microbial defense against genital colonization by pathogens. LACTIN-V developed by Osel, Inc. (Santa Clara, CA) contains a naturally occurring human vaginal strain of Lactobacillus crispatus CTV-05 (LACTIN-V). This product is designed to replenish the vaginal lactobacilli population in women with BV after conventional antibiotic treatment with metronidazole gel (0.75%). Previous formulations of LACTIN-V at lower concentrations administered in a gelatin capsule appeared to be safe in clinical trials when tested for prevention of BV and recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI).21 However, the gelatin capsules dissolved slowly in the vagina, probably impeding vaginal colonization by LACTIN-V, which reached 40% and was below expectation (Osel Inc. Unpublished data. 2006). Consequently, Osel Inc. increased the product dose and designed a novel applicator to facilitate delivery of the powder formulation directly into the vagina in an attempt to improve vaginal colonization of the product. The objective of this phase 1 trial was to assess the safety, tolerability, and acceptability of 3 different doses of this new LACTIN-V formulation using the new vaginal delivery device in healthy volunteers.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Materials and Methods

Design

This was a phase 1, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging, randomized, double blind study in sexually abstinent women conducted at the Clinical Translational Science Institute Clinical Research Center at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), California. The study protocol and informed consent form were approved by the Committee on Human Research at UCSF (43476–30970-02A). Safety oversight was provided by a Safety Monitor. This trial is registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00537576). The trial was conducted from December 2007 through April 2008.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Objectives

The primary objective of this study was to assess the safety, tolerability, and acceptability of vaginal applicators prefilled with 3 doses (5 × 108, 1 × 109, and 2 × 109 colony forming units (cfu)/dose) of LACTIN-V versus placebo when applied vaginally once daily for 5 consecutive days.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Outcomes

Safety was assessed by comparing the incidence of adverse events (AE), including genitourinary (GU) clinical signs and symptoms, colposcopic findings of the genital tract, renal, and liver function among participants randomized to LACTIN-V and those randomized to placebo. The DAIDS Toxicity Table Addendum for Vaginal Microbicide Studies (November 2007) was used to grade GU abnormalities,22 the definition of colposcopic findings was based on the 2004 WHO/CONRAD colposcopy manual,23 and the DAIDS Adult Toxicity Table (December 2004)24 was used to grade serum chemistry, hematology, and other abnormalities. Clinical signs and symptoms were evaluated at enrollment, and 2, 7, 14, and 35 days after initiation of product use; vaginal microflora was assessed at enrollment and 7 and 14 days after initiation of product use; and blood samples for serum chemistry and hematology were collected at enrollment and 14 days after initiation of product use. Tolerability was evaluated by comparing the number of participants in the LACTIN-V and placebo arms who prematurely discontinued themselves from product use due to an AE. Acceptability was assessed using a self-administered questionnaire.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Participants

Volunteers were recruited through advertising in health centers, educational institutions, community bulletin boards, and online forums. They were eligible if they were 18 to 40 years of age and in good health, had regular menstrual cycles of 21 to 35 days in length, were sexually experienced, and willing to abstain from the use of other vaginal products, as well as willing to be sexually abstinent 72 hours before enrollment and until the last clinical visit on day 14. Volunteers who met any of the following criteria were not enrolled: pregnant or within 2 months after pregnancy, currently breastfeeding, clinically detectable genital epithelial disruption, UTI, HIV antibodies, history of recurrent genital herpes, syphilis, vaginal candidiasis, sytic BV as diagnosed per Nugent score ≥7 at screening visit, Trichomonas vaginalis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, or Chlamydia trachomatis at screening visit, abnormal cervical cytology (Pap smear), significantly abnormal serum chemistry or hematology test results, allergy to any known component of study product or latex, initiation of a new long-acting treatment (e.g., depomedroxyprogesterone) within the past 3 months, history of recurrent vaginal infections (≥2 in past 6 months), active uncontrolled medical condition, and use of a new investigational drug within 30 days or an immunosuppressive drug within 60 days before using the study product. Women who met all eligibility criteria were consented before enrollment.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Study Procedures

Each volunteer was seen at 4 scheduled visits, and underwent 2 telephone interviews. At the first visit (screening), informed consent was obtained as well as a medical history. A urine sample was taken to test for β-hCG and for urine dipstick analysis. A urinalysis including urine culture was performed if dipstick analysis revealed abnormalities greater than trace. HIV and STI counseling was performed, and a blood sample was collected to test for HIV, syphilis, as well as testing for hematology, liver, and renal function. A physical examination including pelvic examination followed. The pelvic examination included direct visual inspection, vaginal pH testing, vaginal wet mount for candidiasis, BV by Amsel’s criteria and Nugent’s Gram stain testing, as well as cervicovaginal swabs specimens for T. vaginalis, N. gonorrhoeae, C. trachomatis testing, and a Pap smear. The volunteer was instructed not to use vaginal products and to abstain from sexual intercourse during the 72 hours before the enrollment visit and for the first 14 days of the study.

Qualified subjects were further evaluated for enrollment into the study on their second visit (study day 1), which was scheduled 5 to 14 days after the first day of the next menses and within 30 days after the screening visit. Participants were provided with post-test counseling and screening test results. Eligibility criteria were reviewed and a urine specimen was taken for pregnancy testing and dipstick urinalysis. A review of symptoms was conducted, and a pelvic exam including direct visual inspection, colposcopy, vaginal pH, and vaginal wet mount were performed. If the volunteer still met the eligibility criteria, she was enrolled and a blood sample was collected for hematology, liver, and renal function testing.

Participants received 5 identical, prefilled, single-use applicators containing LACTIN-V or placebo. The first 4 participants received applicators filled with 5 × 108 cfu/dose (150 mg) of LACTIN-V or 150 mg placebo; the next 4 participants received 1 × 109 cfu/dose (300 mg) of LACTIN-V or 300 mg placebo; and the final 4 participants received applicators filled with 2 × 109 cfu/dose (600 mg) of LACTIN-V or 600 mg placebo. The first application of study product was supervised in the clinic. The participant was instructed to insert the study product once daily for the first 4 days of the study and to place the used applicator back into the overwrap and plastic envelope, and to return them to the study clinic at the next visit. The participant was again instructed not to use any other vaginal products and to abstain from sexual intercourse. She was given a diary card on which to record the date and time of product application, as well as any symptoms experienced (e.g., genital tract itching, vaginal odor, abnormal vaginal discharge, nausea, cramping, headache, constipation, diarrhea, common cold symptoms, etc.).

A follow-up telephone call on day 2 inquired about experiences with the product and possible symptoms. Participants returned to the clinic for follow-up visits on day 7 and day 14 after the enrollment visit. During follow-up visits, study staff collected used applicators, which were tested for exposure to vaginal mucus using trypan blue staining technique.25 A review of symptoms, a pelvic exam including direct visual inspection and colposcopy, and collection of vaginal samples for pH and Gram stain were performed at each follow-up visit. Additionally, a urine specimen was taken for pregnancy testing and dipstick urinalysis. During the day 14 follow-up visit, a blood sample was collected for hematology, liver, and renal function testing. A questionnaire evaluating acceptability was completed. A final follow-up telephone call on day 35 assessed possible symptoms, recent medical history, and menstruation since the last clinical visit.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Lab Methods

Pregnancy was tested by rapid urine β-hCG assays (QuickVue+ Pregnancy Test, Quidel Corporation, San Diego, CA). Urine was evaluated by urine dipstick for evidence of UTI (Chemstrips, Roche Diagnostics Limited, West Sussex, UK). HIV antibody testing was conducted using an ELISA (Genetic Systems HIV-1/HIV-2 Plus O EIA, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) with confirmatory Western Blot (Genetic Systems Reflex Western Blot by Bio-Rad) for ELISA positives. Syphilis was assessed by rapid plasma reagin (Becton-Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ) for screening with a confirmatory agglutination test (Fujirebio Serodia T. pallidum Passive Particle Agglutination, Fujirebio Diagnostics, Malvern, PA). BV was diagnosed through the evaluation of Gram stained vaginal smears using Nugent’s criteria.26 Cervicovaginal swabs were evaluated for T. vaginalis, N. gonorrhoeae, and C. trachomatis using nucleotide amplification tests (Gen-Probe Aptima Combo 2 assay by Gen-Probe Inc., San Diego, CA). Pap smears were conducted on cervical specimens (ThinPrep pap test, Cytyc Corporation, Marlborough, MA). Returned used applicators were assessed for exposure to vaginal mucus using 1% trypan blue staining technique.25 Serum was tested for liver and kidney function and whole blood was used for complete blood counts and differentials.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Randomization

The randomization scheme was developed by a UCSF pharmacist not otherwise directly involved with study participants. Subjects were randomized in a 3:1 LACTIN-V to placebo ratio in blocks of 4 corresponding to each dosing group. Individual assignments were concealed in sequentially numbered, sealed study drug kits. The placebo contained the same amount of preservation matrix as the active product, and the participants, investigators, sponsor, and study staff did not know which product a participant received.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Statistical Analyses

The sample size of 12 subjects was chosen based on safety and clinical considerations. Because of the small sample the results are descriptive in nature. Data were entered and managed using the DataFax Clinical Database Management System (version 3.7) and was exported to R (version 2.61) for analysis. The analysis sample was defined as participants who were randomized, and received at least one dose of study product, irrespective of whether they completed the study. AEs were classified after a standard toxicity table.22 Analyses for primary safety study end points were based on treatment group-specific summaries of frequency, severity, and relationship to product use of AEs within each of the 3 dosing blocks. AEs were tabulated both as frequencies and proportions of participants experiencing at least one event, and overall frequency of observed events pooled over participants.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Results

Adherence to Study Protocol

All 12 subjects attended all visits and reported to have inserted all 5 vaginal applicators within the allowable time windows. The mean age was 29.1 (SD = 7.0) years in the LACTIN-V arm versus 27.3 (SD = 1.2) years in the placebo arm. Ten of the 12 participants were white. Lifetime number of sexual partners was 9.9 (SD = 6.8) and 13 (SD = 8.5), and the number of sexual partners in the last 6 months was 1.2 (SD = 1.2) and 1.0 (SD = 1.0) in the LACTIN-V and placebo arms, respectively.

No participant discontinued study product herself or was discontinued from study product by study staff due to an AE (Fig. 1). All applicators were used and returned by study participants. Ninety-three percent of the LACTIN-V applicators and 100% of the placebo applicators stained positive for exposure to vaginal mucus.

Figure 1
Figure 1
Image Tools
Back to Top | Article Outline
Adverse Events

By definition AEs occurred any time after the first applicator was administered and within 35 days of enrollment. All 12 randomized subjects (100%) reported at least one AE. AEs reported in 2 or more subjects included: vaginal discharge (5 subjects, 42%), abdominal pain (4 subjects, 33%), metrorrhagia (4 subjects, 33%), vulvovaginitis (4 subjects, 33%), vaginal candidiasis (3 subjects, 25%), vaginal odor (3 subjects, 25%), and UTI (2 subjects, 17%). AEs were mostly mild in severity (41 of 45 total AEs, 91%) and occurred among 11 subjects. Four of 45 total AEs (9%) were moderate in severity, occurred among 4 subjects, and were determined to be unrelated or probably unrelated to study product: in the LACTIN-V arm one woman suffered from gastroenteritis and another woman had a UTI while in the placebo arm one woman reported ear pain and another woman experienced an upper respiratory tract infection (Table 1). One unexpected AE occurred at the highest dose when an applicator tip separated from the barrel during product administration; this event was not associated with any clinical signs or symptoms. No grade 3 or 4 severity AEs or SAEs occurred during the study.

Table 1
Table 1
Image Tools

Twenty-three AEs (51%) occurred between enrollment and the day 7 visit (i.e., dosing phase), 9 AEs (20%) were reported between day 7 and day 14 (postdosing phase), and 13 AEs (29%) occurred between day 14 and the telephone interview on day 35. About half of the AEs occurred during the first 7 days of follow-up, which included the 5-day dosing phase; the other half took place between days 8 and 35.

Of the 45 AEs in the study, 31 (69%) occurred among the 9 participants (75% of all participants) receiving LACTIN-V at 3 different dose levels. Of these, 22 AEs (71%) were possibly, probably, or definitely related with study product use. The 3 subjects receiving placebo at 3 different dose levels (25% of all participants) experienced 14 AEs (31%), of which 6 (43%) were possibly, probably, or definitely related with study product use.

Thirty-one of the 45 AEs (69%) were GU AEs. Of these 31 GU AEs, 26 (84%) were classified to be either possibly, probably, or definitely related to the investigational product. GU AEs were evenly distributed between the treatment blocks as well as between the LACTIN-V and placebo arms (Table 2). Four women experienced 5 GU tract infections during the study. One woman receiving placebo (block II) was diagnosed with asymptomatic candidiasis at visit 2 (day 7); another participant receiving LACTIN-V (block III) reported symptomatic candidiasis at visit 2 (day 7), which was confirmed by wet mount. A third participant receiving LACTIN-V (block II) had asymptomatic candidiasis at visit 3 (day 14) and also experienced an asymptomatic UTI with positive results per urine dipstick confirmed by urine culture (>100,000 cfu/mL) at visit 2 (day 7). During the day 35 telephone interview one woman receiving LACTIN-V (block II) reported a UTI that had already resolved.

Table 2
Table 2
Image Tools
Back to Top | Article Outline
Colposcopy Findings

Colposcopy was performed at the enrollment visit (day 1), visit 2 (day 7), and visit 3 (day 14). Colposcopic findings were evenly distributed between the treatment blocks as well as between the LACTIN-V and placebo arms. No deep epithelial disruption was detected by colposcopy (Table 3).

Table 3
Table 3
Image Tools
Back to Top | Article Outline
Laboratory Findings

Blood for additional assessment of safety was drawn at the screening visit, enrollment visit, and final visit at day 14. The changes in hematology and serum chemistry results were minor and clinically insignificant.

Only women with a Nugent Score of <7 were eligible to participate in the study. At the screening visit, 11 of 12 randomized participants (92%) had Nugent Scores of 0 to 3 (normal vaginal flora) and one had an intermediate Nugent Score of 4 to 6 (8%). At the day 14 visit all 12 subjects (100%) had a Nugent Scores consistent with normal vaginal flora.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Tolerability and Acceptability

No participant prematurely discontinued the trial due to AEs. Ten of 12 women (83%) agreed or strongly agreed with statements regarding the overall satisfaction with the study product and the comfort of using the study product.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Discussion

This small phase I study was designed to assess the safety and acceptability of LACTIN-V in healthy women using a new delivery system and at a higher dose than previously tested in other studies (Osel Inc. unpublished data. 2006).21 No grade 3 or 4 severity AEs or SAEs occurred.

The reported AEs were evenly distributed between treatment blocks and study arms. Forty-one of the 45 AEs were graded as mild and 28 AEs were classified as related to product use. A third of all AEs occurred among placebo users who represented a quarter of all study participants. Vaginal discharge was the most common adverse event. The highest dose of 600 mg required more forceful ejection of study product, which led to the disengagement of the applicator tip in a single occasion. After this incident, the applicator was redesigned for future trials.

In summary, the data collected in this study suggest that vaginal administration of LACTIN-V administered once daily by a vaginal applicator for 5 days, at a dose level up to 2 ×109 cfu/dose, is safe and well-tolerated in premenopausal healthy women.

The authors recognize the limitations of the small sample size in this trial that enrolled healthy women. The assessment of product safety in women with BV is an important objective in ongoing and planned future trials of LACTIN-V.

A high recurrence rate of BV after conventional antibiotic treatments18,19 illustrates the need for enhanced therapy to prevent recurrent BV. LACTIN-V was designed to facilitate the repopulation of normal vaginal Lactobacillus strains. Previous formulations of lower dose LACTIN-V had good safety outcomes, but the rates of LACTIN-V colonization were lower than expected. We hypothesize that the administration of the higher dose LACTIN-V by a vaginal applicator will lead to increased colonization of LACTIN-V after treatment of BV and thereby could reduce the risk of BV recurrence. A phase 2 trial to continue the assessment of product safety and determine the colonization efficiency of LACTIN-V at 2 × 109 cfu/dose in women with BV after metronidazole gel (0.75%) treatment is underway.

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. Pastore LM, Thorp JM Jr, Royce RA, et al. Risk score for antenatal bacterial vaginosis: BV PIN points. J Perinatol 2002; 22:125–132.

2. Gibney L, Macaluso M, Kirk K, et al. Prevalence of infectious diseases in Bangladeshi women living adjacent to a truck stand: HIV/STD/hepatitis/genital tract infections. Sex Transm Infect 2001; 77:344–350.

3. Goldenberg RL, Klebanoff MA, Nugent R, et al; for Vaginal Infections and Prematurity Study Group. Bacterial colonization of the vagina during pregnancy in four ethnic groups. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 174:1618–1621.

4. Sewankambo N, Gray RH, Wawer MJ, et al. HIV-1 infection associated with abnormal vaginal flora morphology and bacterial vaginosis. Lancet 1997; 350:546–550.

5. Allsworth JE, Peipert JF. Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis: 2001–2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109:114–120.

6. Eschenbach DA, Hillier S, Critchlow C, et al. Diagnosis and clinical manifestations of bacterial vaginosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 158:819–828.

7. Larsson PG, Platz-Christensen JJ, Thejls H, et al. Incidence of pelvic inflammatory disease after first-trimester legal abortion in women with bacterial vaginosis after treatment with metronidazole: a double-blind, randomized study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 166:100–103.

8. Hillier SL, Kiviat NB, Hawes SE, et al. Role of bacterial vaginosis-associated microorganisms in endometritis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 175:435–441.

9. Newton ER, Prihoda TJ, Gibbs RS. A clinical and microbiologic analysis of risk factors for puerperal endometritis. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 75:402–406.

10. Watts DH, Krohn MA, Hillier SL, et al. Bacterial vaginosis as a risk factor for post-cesarean endometritis. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 75:52–58.

11. Hillier SL, Nugent RP, Eschenbach DA, et al; for The Vaginal Infections and Prematurity Study Group. Association between bacterial vaginosis and preterm delivery of a low-birth-weight infant. N Engl J Med 1995; 333:1737–1742.

12. Kurki T, Sivonen A, Renkonen OV, et al. Bacterial vaginosis in early pregnancy and pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 80:173–177.

13. Hillier SL, Martius J, Krohn M, et al. A case-control study of chorioamnionic infection and histologic chorioamnionitis in prematurity. N Engl J Med 1988; 319:972–978.

14. Silver HM, Sperling RS, St Clair PJ, et al. Evidence relating bacterial vaginosis to intraamniotic infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161:808–812.

15. Taha TE, Hoover DR, Dallabetta GA, et al. Bacterial vaginosis and disturbances of vaginal flora: association with increased acquisition of HIV. Aids 1998; 12:1699–1706.

16. Martin HL, Richardson BA, Nyange PM, et al. Vaginal lactobacilli, microbial flora, and risk of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and sexually transmitted disease acquisition. J Infect Dis 1999; 180:1863–1868.

17. Myer L, Denny L, Telerant R, et al. Bacterial vaginosis and susceptibility to HIV infection in South African women: a nested case-control study. J Infect Dis 2005; 192:1372–1380.

18. Bradshaw CS, Morton AN, Hocking J, et al. High recurrence rates of bacterial vaginosis over the course of 12 months after oral metronidazole therapy and factors associated with recurrence. J Infect Dis 2006; 193:1478–1486.

19. Myer L, Kuhn L, Denny L, et al. Recurrence of symptomatic bacterial vaginosis 12 months after oral metronidazole therapy in HIV-positive and -negative women. J Infect Dis 2006; 194:1797–1799.

20. Bolton M, van der Straten A, Cohen CR. Probiotics: potential to prevent HIV and sexually transmitted infections in women. Sex Transm Dis 2008; 35:214–225.

21. Czaja CA, Stapleton AE, Yarova-Yarovaya Y, et al. Phase I trial of a Lactobacillus crispatus vaginal suppository for prevention of recurrent urinary tract infection in women. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 2007; 2007:35387.

22. Division of AIDS. DAIDS Toxicity Table Addendum for Vaginal Microbicide Studies (November 2007). Division of AIDS; 2007.

23. CONRAD/WHO. Manual for the standardization of colposcopy for the evaluation of vaginal products. 2004. Available at: http://www.conrad.org/colpo/Revised_Manual.PDF. Accessed September 19, 2008.

24. Division of AIDS. Table for Grading Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events. 2004. Available at: http://www3.niaid.nih.gov/research/resources/DAIDSClinRsrch/PDF/Safety/DAIDSAEGradingTable.pdf. Accessed September 19, 2008.

25. Wallace A, Thorn M, Maguire RA, et al. Assay for establishing whether microbicide applicators have been exposed to the vagina. Sex Transm Dis 2004; 31:465–468.

26. Nugent RP, Krohn MA, Hillier SL. Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation. J Clin Microbiol 1991; 29:297–301.

© Copyright 2009 American Sexually Transmitted Diseases Association

Login