Sexually Transmitted Diseases

Skip Navigation LinksHome > September 2008 - Volume 35 - Issue 9 > Viral Sexually Transmitted Infections and Bacterial Vaginosi...
Sexually Transmitted Diseases:
doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181788301

Viral Sexually Transmitted Infections and Bacterial Vaginosis: 2001–2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Data

Allsworth, Jenifer E. PhD*; Lewis, Vanessa A. BA†; Peipert, Jeffrey F. MD, PhD*

Free Access
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

From the *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and †Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri

This research was supported in part by a Midcareer Investigator Award in Women’s Health Research (Peipert, K24 HD01298). Dr. Allsworth is supported by Grant KL2RR024994/5K12RR023249 from the National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and NIH Roadmap for Medical Research.

Correspondence: Jenifer E. Allsworth, PhD, Division of Clinical Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, Campus Box 8219, 4533 Clayton Avenue, Suite 100, St. Louis, Missouri 63110. E-mail:

Received for publication November 15, 2007, and accepted March 21, 2008.

Collapse Box


Background: Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a common condition believed to be associated with sexually transmitted infection (STI) susceptibility. Most studies of BV and STIs have come from treatment-seeking or high-risk populations. This study examines the association between 5 viral STIs, human papilloma virus (HPV), HIV, herpes simplex viruses types 1 and 2 (HSV-1 and HSV-2), and Hepatitis C (HCV), and BV among women in the general US population.

Methods: Data from the 2001 and 2003–2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys were combined. Crude and adjusted relative risks and 95% confidence intervals were estimated from logistic regression analyses for rare outcomes (<10%) and from Poisson regression with robust error variance for common outcomes. Complex survey design was taken into consideration using the survey functions in Stata.

Results: Crude analyses found an association between BV and the prevalence of all 5 STIs. After adjustment for important confounders, only HSV-1 and HSV-2 were significantly associated with the presence of BV. Moreover, crude analyses stratified by race/ethnicity suggested that associations between BV and viral STIs may not be consistent across race/ethnicity subgroups.

Conclusion: This population-based study found that BV was significantly associated with the prevalence of HSV-1 and HSV-2 and potentially associated with HIV and HPV. Given the frequency of BV in US women, small increases in STI susceptibility may have important impacts on STI transmission.

Bacterial vaginosis (BV), the main cause of abnormal vaginal discharge, is one of the most common and recurrent lower genital tract infections in women of reproductive age. BV is a sexually associated condition that is common in the general population affecting from 20% to as many as 50% of reproductive-aged women and varies dramatically by race/ethnicity.1 It is characterized by the replacement of lactobacilli, the predominant vaginal flora, with an overgrowth of Gardnerella vaginalis, Mycoplasma organisms, and other anaerobic bacteria. In women without BV hydrogen peroxide producing lactobacilli dominate vaginal flora.2 These lactobacilli are thought to protect against pathogens through the maintenance of a low pH.3 The microorganisms responsible for BV increase mucin-degrading enzymes, which may play a role in the degradation of the gel layer that coats the vaginal and cervical epithelium and endocervical mucus.4–7 BV-associated microorganisms also produce cytokines and inflammatory mediators,8–10 which have been linked to pregnancy complications11 and may increase susceptibility to sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Specifically, in clinical studies BV has been found to be associated with genital tract infections, such as pelvic inflammatory disease,12,13 and the prevalence and incidence of multiple STDs including chlamydia, gonorrhea, herpes, HIV, and trichomoniasis.14–20

Although many studies have attempted to assess the association between BV and HIV, there is little information describing the association between BV and other viral STIs among women in the general population. In this study we describe the prevalence of five viral STIs [human papilloma virus (HPV), HIV, herpes simplex viruses Types 1 and 2 (HSV-1 and HSV-2), and Hepatitis C (HCV)] among women with and without BV between the ages of 20 and 49 years who reside in the United States using the population-based National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). We also examined the association between BV and individual viral STIs.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Design and Study Population

We used data from NHANES samples for the combined intervals 2001–2002 and 2003–2004 to estimate the prevalence of BV among women in the civilian, noninstitutionalized US population. NHANES, conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, was designed to obtain nationally representative information on the health and nutritional status of the population of the United States through interviews and direct physical examinations. Methods describing this national survey have been published elsewhere.21 This study submitted to the Washington University School of Medicine Human Subjects Committee for approval was classified as exempted because it is a population-based study devoid of individual identifiers.

For these analyses, women between the ages of 20 and 49 with complete information regarding BV status were used for evaluation. The final sample included data from 2326 women, who when weighted, represent the experience of 55,840,143 noninstitutionalized women residing in the United States.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Bacterial Vaginosis

Female participants in the NHANES study between the ages of 14 and 49 years were tested for BV. Self-collected vaginal swabs were used for the evaluation of BV. Smears were allowed to air dry before shipment to the processing and analysis laboratory at Magee-Women’s Hospital (Pittsburgh, PA). BV score for Gram staining was calculated by Nugent’s method.22 Scores of 7 or higher were considered positive for bacterial vaginosis, whereas those between 4 and 6 were considered intermediate. BV scores from self-collected swabs have been found to be reliable compared with provider collected samples.23–25 Additional details on laboratory procedures have been published elsewhere.26–30 Prevalence was estimated for the 3 levels of BV: positive, negative, and intermediate. For logistic regression analyses, the outcome was defined as BV confirmed (positive) or not (negative and intermediate).

Back to Top | Article Outline
Viral STIs

Self-collected vaginal swabs were evaluated for the presence of HPV. The HPV polymerase chain reaction assay used HPV L1 consensus PCR with biotinylated PGMY09/11 primer sets and β-globin as an internal control for sample amplification. The primer mix amplifies essentially all HPV types found in the genital tract. The amplicons were evaluated by gel electrophoresis for the presence of the 450 bp HPV amplicon. Positive samples were typed by hybridization to the Roche protype line probe typing strips followed by colorimetric detection. The strip was a linear array of probes specific for 37 HPV types (6, 11, 16, 18, 26, 31, 33, 35, 39, 40, 42, 45, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 58, 59, 61, 62, 64, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 81, 82, 83, 84, IS39, and 89) and for the positive β-globin control as well. Types were read by comparing the reaction pattern to the typing template.28,31,32 In addition to examining any HPV in our analyses we also examined common subtypes previously associated with genital warts (6 and 11) and cervical cancer (16 and 18).

Back to Top | Article Outline

Specimens were tested for HIV-1 and HIV-2 antibodies using the synthetic peptide enzyme immunoassay (EIA; Genetic Systems HIV-1/HIV-2 Peptide EIA). Any specimens that reacted in the initial test were duplicated. Specimens that were reactive in both tests were tested with the Cambridge Biotech HIV-1 Western Blot Kit (Calypte Biomedical Corporation, Rockville, MD). If the EIA was negative and the Western Blot positive, the specimen was coded as positive. If the EIA was positive and the Western Blot negative, the specimen was coded as negative. If the EIA was positive or indeterminate and the Western Blot was indeterminate, the specimen was coded as indeterminate.29

Back to Top | Article Outline
HSV-1 and HSV-2.

Viral glycoproteins specific for HSV-2 (designated gG-2) and HSV-1 (designated gG-1) have been identified. Monoclonal antibodies and affinity chromatography were used to purify these glycoproteins and thus provide antigens for type-specific herpes serologic assays. Solid-phase enzymatic immunodot assays were used to detect antibodies reactive to these antigens,33 which has demonstrated good sensitivity and discriminates HSV-1 and HSV-2.34 Serum samples testing positive for HSV-2 in the immunodot assay were further confirmed by a gG-2 monoclonal antibody inhibition assay.35

Back to Top | Article Outline

Human antibodies directed against hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) in human serum or plasma were measured using direct solid-phase enzyme immunoassay with the anti-HCV screening ELISA. Results were expressed as “positive,” “negative,” or indeterminate for anti-HCV. Positive specimens are repeated in duplicate according to the same procedure. Repeatedly positive specimens were tested supplementally using the Chiron RIBA Processor System (Chiron Corporation, Inc.). Samples where the RIBA result was positive were reported as confirmed positive for antibody to HCV. Samples where the recombinant immunoblot assay result was negative or indeterminate were reported as negative or indeterminate, respectively.30

Back to Top | Article Outline
Sociodemographic Characteristics

Self-reported sociodemographic characteristics included in these analyses included age, race/ethnicity, highest level of education received, and poverty/income ratio. Age was categorized by decade (20–29, 30–39, and 40–49). Race/ethnicity was categorized as white non-Hispanic; black non-Hispanic, Mexican American; or other race/other Hispanic. Three levels of education were evaluated: less than High School, completed High School (or GED), or more than High School. Poverty/income ratio (PIR) was the ratio of the individual’s family household income to the federal poverty level and was categorized as less than the federal poverty level (PIR <1), at or above the federal poverty level (PIR 1 to <2), or twice the federal poverty level (PIR ≥2).

Back to Top | Article Outline
Reproductive and Sexual History

In this analysis, we examined a number of reproductive history variables. Age at first menstruation was categorized as 7 to 11 years, 12 to 14 years, 15 years or later, or unknown. Douching within the past 6 months was defined as yes, no, or unknown.

Women between the ages of 14 and 49 also completed a sexual history questionnaire that included questions on history of sexual intercourse, and number of lifetime and last year sexual partners. However, because of confidentiality concerns, sexual history data for individuals between the ages of 14 and 19 years are only available at the National Center for Health Statistics Research Data Center. Therefore, all analyses were limited to women between the ages of 20 and 49 years.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Statistical Methods

Categorical data were compared using χ2 tests. Crude and adjusted odds relative risks were estimated using logistic regression for rare STIs (HPV subtypes, HIV and HCV) and Poisson regression for common STIs (HPV, HSV-1, and HSV-2).36 All analyses adjusted for the complex sampling design of NHANES. Specifically, using the svyset command in Stata we specified the individual weight, primary sampling unit, and stratum. The 2-year individual weights estimated by the National Center of Health Statistics and made available as part of the NHANES dataset are adjusted to the entire US population based on 2000 Census information. To accommodate the joining of 2001–2002 and 2003–2004 datasets—each adjusted to the US population—the weight for each individual was divided by 2 to provide a single estimate for the entire US population. Statistical analyses were conducted using Stata (version 9.2).37

Back to Top | Article Outline


One third of the women in this sample were positive for BV at the time of their NHANES examination. BV was significantly more common among black and Mexican American women compared with white women (53.7% and 31.9% vs. 24.3%, respectively), among women living below or at the federal poverty level compared with those living at greater than two times the poverty level (36.1% and 29.7% vs. 24.4%, respectively), and slightly more common among women with earlier ages at first intercourse. The number of lifetime sexual partners was associated with BV prevalence and ranged from a low of 15.6% among women with no reported sexual partners to a high of 35.5% among those with 11 or more lifetime sexual partners. BV prevalence was also associated with number of partners in the past year and recent douching (see Table 1).

Table 1
Table 1
Image Tools

In bivariate analyses BV was strongly associated with all 5 viral STIs examined, including any HPV, HIV, HSV-1, HSV-2, and HCV (see Table 2). BV was significantly associated with 2 oncogenic subtypes (HPV 16 and HPV 18) and positively correlated, but not significantly so, for 2 common subtypes associated with genital warts (HPV 6 and HPV 11). For all STIs, other than HPV (HPV 16, HPV 18), the prevalence was highest among those positive for BV. The relationship for HPV (HPV 6, HPV 11) and HCV increased with Nugent category, whereas for HIV, HSV-1, and HSV-2 the prevalence was similar for those in the intermediate and negative categories and highest among those positive for BV.

Table 2
Table 2
Image Tools

We examined the relative risk of each viral STI adjusting for potential confounders, including sociodemographic characteristics, sexual behavior, and douching practice (see Table 3). In crude analyses, BV was associated with increased risk of HIV, HSV-1, and HSV-2. After adjustment for race/ethnicity, number of sexual partners in the past year, and douching in the past month, only HSV-1 and HSV-2 were significantly associated with the presence of BV. There were positive, yet nonsignificant associations between BV and HPV (subtypes 6 and 11) HIV, and HCV. Adjusting for lifetime number of sexual partners did not alter the findings (data not shown).

Table 3
Table 3
Image Tools

Finally, we also stratified by race/ethnicity to evaluate for the presence of effect modification given the documented association with BV and STIs.38 For these analyses, we collapsed intermediate and negative Gram stain scores into a non-BV category. In the combined univariate analyses, BV was systematically associated with viral STIs; however, this association may be modified by race/ethnicity (data not shown). In the stratified analyses, there was little absolute difference in the prevalence of HPV by BV status among white women (27.1% vs. 26.8%, P = 0.07), yet there were substantial, yet nonsignificant differences among black (30.3% vs. 44.0%, P = 0.18) and Mexican American women (19.8% vs. 32.3%, P = 0.12). HSV-2 was more common among women with BV for both white (18.3% vs. 28.6%, P = 0.01) and black (53.3% vs. 66.0%, P = 0.02) women, but this association was not found among Mexican American women (17.5% vs. 18.7%, P = 0.86). Similarly, HSV-1 and HCV were more common among white and black women with BV, but slightly less common in Mexican American women with BV.

Back to Top | Article Outline


In this nationally representative sample, we found an association between HSV-1 and HSV-2 with the presence of BV. The risk of concurrent HSV-2 infection was 32% higher and the risk of concurrent HSV-1 was 8% higher among women with BV than among women without BV after adjusting for race/ethnicity, sexual partners in the past year, and douching in the past month. Whether this association applies across categories of race/ethnicity is not clear. Our crude analyses found the prevalence of HSV-2 was associated with BV only among white, non-Hispanic, and black non-Hispanic women. Among Mexican American women the prevalence was approximately 18% in both the BV categories.

The relationship between BV and HSV-2 may be bidirectional. A recent clinic study found that current, but not past, BV was found to predict disease HSV-2 seropositivity.20 The presence of BV has also been linked to increased frequency of genital tract shedding of HSV-2 and its reactivation from latency.39 Conversely, HSV-2 seropositivity has been found to be associated with the incidence of BV,40,41 and BV has been found to increase acquisition of HSV-2 in comparison with those with normal vaginal flora.42

BV was associated with a modest, but statistically significant, increase in the risk for HSV-1. Given that HSV-1 was determined through serologic testing that does not allow for the isolation of infection site or transmission pathway, the current estimate is likely an underestimate of the true association. Although HSV-1 has been traditionally considered to result from nonsexual transmission, recent studies have found that an increasing proportion of genital herpes infections, particularly among adolescents and those in industrialized countries, are attributable to HSV-1.43–47 Roberts et al.43 examined the incidence of genital herpes attributable to HSV-1 among college students and detected a significant shift from 31% of infections in 1993 to 78% in 2001. Similarly, a study from an academic medical center that included participants of all ages reported that the proportion of genital herpes infections attributable to HSV-1 increased from 24% to 45% from 1994 to 1999.45 As with HSV-2, there is some evidence that HSV-1 seropositivity may also increase the acquisition of BV.41 A longitudinal study by Cherpes et al. examined whether women with serum antibodies for HSV-1 were more likely to develop BV and found a modest association in crude analyses, but no effect after adjusting for potential confounders.

We found that BV was associated with a 5-fold higher risk of HIV among women with BV; however, these findings were attenuated significantly after adjusting for race/ethnicity, recent sexual partners, and douching in the past month (RR = 2.10, 95% CI, 0.48–9.15). Previous studies have correlated the presence of BV with increased HIV infection and shedding of HIV,18,48–50 but it is possible that the lack of significant finding in this sample is the result of inadequate sample size resulting from the low prevalence of HIV. When additional waves of NHANES data become available this finding can be confirmed.

This study did not confirm other studies that have found a correlation between BV and increased risk of HPV infection. A recent study found that BV is associated with an increased risk of prevalent and incident HPV infection, but not with duration or development of squamous intraepithelial lesion even when adjusted for lifetime and current partners.51 Another study performed a time lag analysis of HPV DNA detection and clinical diagnosis of BV and found that HPV DNA detection usually preceded the presence of BV.52 Although we did not find a significant association for either any HPV type or HPV (HPV 6, HPV 11) the adjusted relative risk for HPV (HPV 16, HPV 18) was approximately 2.7, suggesting a potentially important risk, which should be investigated further. Whether this lack of statistical association is due to inadequate sample size or some other influence, such as spontaneous clearance of HPV infection,53 is not known.

There are a number of strengths of the current analysis. Clinical studies of BV and STIs are limited in generalizability to comparable patient populations. This nationally representative sample of noninstitutionalized women of reproductive age, however, is generalizable to women in the general population. Moreover, the NHANES sample is not subject to many of the selection forces that limit participation in clinical studies including ability to pay for health care and proximity to health care facilities. Finally, the measurement of BV and viral STIs use objective biologic specimens with well regarded testing procedures.

There are a number of limitations that should be considered when evaluating these findings. First, the viral STIs studied here are not currently curable and may persist in the body for long periods. Second, for HSV-1, HSV-2, and HCV there are sexual and nonsexual modes of transmission, and for HSV-1 and HSV-2 serologic results also reflect nongenital infections. Collapsing sexual and nonsexual modes of transmission and genital and nongenital infections may have led us to underestimate the association between BV and sexually transmitted genital HSV. Moreover, the use of NHANES data limited the information about confounding variables, and the sample size limited the analyses that could be conducted including multivariable models stratified by race/ethnicity potentially resulting in incomplete confounding, especially by sexual activity. Finally, this is a cross-sectional study and does not imply causality or ensure temporality. Moreover, it is plausible that BV increases risk of viral infections and that viral infections may increase the risk of BV40,41; therefore, it is not possible in a cross-sectional study to disentangle or quantify the possible bidirectional relationship. Additional prospective research is needed to estimate the relative contribution of BV to viral STIs.

In this study, we found a statistically significant association between HSV-1, HSV-2 and BV among women in the general population. Whether this finding can be extended to all race/ethnicity groups is not known, but should be explored in future studies. Given that BV may be an important risk factor for STIs, additional research exploring whether these findings are a reflection of differences in biologic susceptibility, differences in risk behaviors, or a consequence of preceding STI needs to be elucidated. Additional prospective research is needed to estimate the relative contribution of BV to the incidence of viral STIs.

Back to Top | Article Outline


1. Allsworth JE, Peipert JF. Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis: 2001–2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109:114–120.

2. Eschenbach DA, Davick PR, Williams BL, et al. Prevalence of hydrogen peroxide-producing Lactobacillus species in normal women and women with bacterial vaginosis. J Clin Microbiol 1989; 27:251–256.

3. Wylie JG, Henderson A. Identity and glycogen-fermenting ability of lactobacilli isolated from the vagina of pregnant women. J Med Microbiol 1969; 2:363–366.

4. McGregor JA, French JI, Jones W, et al. Bacterial vaginosis is associated with prematurity and vaginal fluid mucinase and sialidase: Results of a controlled trial of topical clindamycin cream. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 170:1048–1059; discussion 1059–1060.

5. Roberton AM, Wiggins R, Horner PJ, et al. A novel bacterial mucinase, glycosulfatase, is associated with bacterial vaginosis. J Clin Microbiol 2005; 43:5504–5508.

6. Olmsted SS, Meyn LA, Rohan LC, et al. Glycosidase and proteinase activity of anaerobic gram-negative bacteria isolated from women with bacterial vaginosis. Sex Transm Dis 2003; 30:257–261.

7. Cauci S, Culhane JF, Di Santolo M, et al. Among pregnant women with bacterial vaginosis, the hydrolytic enzymes sialidase and prolidase are positively associated with interleukin-1beta. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 198:132.

8. Goepfert AR, Varner M, Ward K, et al. Differences in inflammatory cytokine and Toll-like receptor genes and bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193:1478–1485.

9. Yudin MH, Landers DV, Meyn L, et al. Clinical and cervical cytokine response to treatment with oral or vaginal metronidazole for bacterial vaginosis during pregnancy: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102:527–534.

10. Cauci S, Driussi S, Guaschino S, et al. Correlation of local interleukin-1beta levels with specific IgA response against Gardnerella vaginalis cytolysin in women with bacterial vaginosis. Am J Reprod Immunol 2002; 47:257–264.

11. Svare JA, Schmidt H, Hansen BB, et al. Bacterial vaginosis in a cohort of Danish pregnant women: Prevalence and relationship with preterm delivery, low birthweight, and perinatal infections. BJOG 2006; 113:1419–1425.

12. Peipert JF, Montagno AB, Cooper AS, et al. Bacterial vaginosis as a risk factor for upper genital tract infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177:1184–1187.

13. Ness RB, Kip KE, Hillier SL, et al. A cluster analysis of bacterial vaginosis-associated microflora and pelvic inflammatory disease. Am J Epidemiol 2005; 162:585–590.

14. Cu-Uvin S, Hogan JW, Warren D, et al. Prevalence of lower genital tract infections among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-seropositive and high-risk HIV-seronegative women. HIV Epidemiology Research Study Group. Clin Infect Dis 1999; 29:1145–1150.

15. Yen S, Shafer MA, Moncada J, et al. Bacterial vaginosis in sexually experienced and non-sexually experienced young women entering the military. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102(5 Pt 1):927–933.

16. Moodley P, Connolly C, Sturm AW. Interrelationships among human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection, bacterial vaginosis, trichomoniasis, and the presence of yeasts. J Infect Dis 2002; 185:69–73.

17. Royce RA, Thorp J, Granados JL, et al. Bacterial vaginosis associated with HIV infection in pregnant women from North Carolina. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol 1999; 20:382–386.

18. Cohen CR, Duerr A, Pruithithada N, et al. Bacterial vaginosis and HIV seroprevalence among female commercial sex workers in Chiang Mai, Thailand. Aids 1995; 9:1093–1097.

19. Ness RB, Kip KE, Soper DE, et al. Bacterial vaginosis (BV) and the risk of incident gonococcal or chlamydial genital infection in a predominantly black population. Sex Transm Dis 2005; 32:413–417.

20. Evans BA, Kell PD, Bond RA, et al. Predictors of seropositivity to herpes simplex virus type 2 in women. Int J STD AIDS 2003; 14:30–36.

21. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). National Health and Nutrition Examination Analytic and Reporting Guidelines. Available at: Accessed July 14, 2006.

22. Nugent RP, Krohn MA, Hillier SL. Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation. J Clin Microbiol 1991; 29:297–301.

23. Schwebke JR, Morgan SC, Weiss HL. The use of sequential self-obtained vaginal smears for detecting changes in the vaginal flora. Sex Transm Dis 1997; 24:236–239.

24. Strauss RA, Eucker B, Savitz DA, et al. Diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis from self-obtained vaginal swabs. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 2005; 13:31–35.

25. Nelson DB, Bellamy S, Gray TS, et al. Self-collected versus provider-collected vaginal swabs for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis: an assessment of validity and reliability. J Clin Epidemiol 2003; 56:862–866.

26. Laboratory Procedure Manual: Bacterial Vaginosis. National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2006.

27. Trichomonas Vaginalis and Bacterial Vaginosis. Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2006.

28. Human Papillomavirus (HPV) DNA Hybrid Capture, PCR, and Hybridization Results from Vaginal Swab Samples. Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2006.

29. Laboratory Assessment: Lab 3—HIV Antibody Test Result, CD4+ T Lymphocytes, and CD8+ T Cells. National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2006.

30. Hepatitis B Surface Antigen and Hepatitis C Antibody (Confirmed). Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2006.

31. Gravitt PE, Peyton CL, Alessi TQ, et al. Improved amplification of genital human papillomaviruses. J Clin Microbiol 2000; 38:357–361.

32. Gravitt PE, Peyton CL, Apple RJ, et al. Genotyping of 27 human papillomavirus types by using L1 consensus PCR products by a single-hybridization, reverse line blot detection method. J Clin Microbiol 1998; 36:3020–3027.

33. Lee FK, Pereira L, Griffin C, et al. A novel glycoprotein for detection of herpes simplex virus type 1-specific antibodies. J Virol Methods 1986; 14:111–118.

34. Ashley RL, Militoni J, Lee F, et al. Comparison of Western blot (immunoblot) and glycoprotein G-specific immunodot enzyme assay for detecting antibodies to herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 in human sera. J Clin Microbiol 1988; 26:662–667.

35. Herpes I and Herpes II. Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2006.

36. McNutt LA, Wu C, Xue X, et al. Estimating the relative risk in cohort studies and clinical trials of common outcomes. Am J Epidemiol 2003; 157:940–943.

37. Stata [computer program]. Version. College Station, Texas.

38. Peipert JF, Lapane KL, Allsworth JE, et al. Bacterial vaginosis and incident sexually transmitted infections: Does race modify the association. Sex Transm Dis 2008; 35:363–367.

39. Cherpes TL, Melan MA, Kant JA, et al. Genital tract shedding of herpes simplex virus type 2 in women: Effects of hormonal contraception, bacterial vaginosis, and vaginal group B Streptococcus colonization. Clin Infect Dis 2005; 40:1422–1428.

40. Nagot N, Ouedraogo A, Defer MC, et al. Association between bacterial vaginosis and Herpes simplex virus type-2 infection: implications for HIV acquisition studies. Sex Transm Infect 2007; 83:365–368.

41. Cherpes TL, Hillier SL, Meyn LA, et al. A delicate balance: risk factors for acquisition of bacterial vaginosis include sexual activity, absence of hydrogen peroxide-producing lactobacilli, black race, and positive herpes simplex virus type 2 serology. Sex Transm Dis 2008; 35:78–83.

42. Cherpes TL, Meyn LA, Krohn MA, et al. Association between acquisition of herpes simplex virus type 2 in women and bacterial vaginosis. Clin Infect Dis 2003; 37:319–325.

43. Roberts CM, Pfister JR, Spear SJ. Increasing proportion of herpes simplex virus type 1 as a cause of genital herpes infection in college students. Sex Transm Dis 2003; 30:797–800.

44. Xu F, Sternberg MR, Kottiri BJ, et al. Trends in herpes simplex virus type 1 and type 2 seroprevalence in the United States. JAMA 2006; 296:964–973.

45. Ribes JA, Steele AD, Seabolt JP, et al. Six-year study of the incidence of herpes in genital and nongenital cultures in a central Kentucky medical center patient population. J Clin Microbiol 2001; 39:3321–3325.

46. Cowan FM, Copas A, Johnson AM, et al. Herpes simplex virus type 1 infection: a sexually transmitted infection of adolescence? Sex Transm Infect 2002; 78:346–348.

47. Coyle PV, O’Neill HJ, Wyatt DE, et al. Emergence of herpes simplex type 1 as the main cause of recurrent genital ulcerative disease in women in Northern Ireland. J Clin Virol 2003; 27:22–29.

48. Sewankambo N, Gray RH, Wawer MJ, et al. HIV-1 infection associated with abnormal vaginal flora morphology and bacterial vaginosis. Lancet 1997; 350:546–550.

49. Martin HL, Richardson BA, Nyange PM, et al. Vaginal lactobacilli, microbial flora, and risk of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and sexually transmitted disease acquisition. J Infect Dis 1999; 180:1863–1868.

50. Cu-Uvin S, Hogan JW, Caliendo AM, et al. Association between bacterial vaginosis and expression of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA in the female genital tract. Clin Infect Dis 2001; 33:894–896.

51. Watts DH, Fazzari M, Minkoff H, et al. Effects of bacterial vaginosis and other genital infections on the natural history of human papillomavirus infection in HIV-1-infected and high-risk HIV-1-uninfected women. J Infect Dis 2005; 191:1129–1139.

52. Mao C, Hughes JP, Kiviat N, et al. Clinical findings among young women with genital human papillomavirus infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188:677–684.

53. Plummer M, Schiffman M, Castle PE, et al. A 2-year prospective study of human papillomavirus persistence among women with a cytological diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. J Infect Dis 2007; 195:1582–1589.

Cited By:

This article has been cited 1 time(s).

Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Bacterial Vaginosis-Race and Sexual Transmission: Issues of Causation
Allsworth, JE
Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 37(3): 137-139.
PDF (112) | CrossRef
Back to Top | Article Outline

© Copyright 2008 American Sexually Transmitted Diseases Association


Article Tools



Article Level Metrics