Taylor, Melanie M. MD, MPH*; Aynalem, Getahun MD, MPH†; Olea, Leanne M. BA*†; He, Peter MD, MPH†; Smith, Lisa V. MS, DrPH†; Kerndt, Peter R. MD, MPH†
From the *Division of STD Prevention, National Center for HIV, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia; and †Los Angeles County STD Program Control, Department of Public Health, Los Angeles, California
Presented in part as Abstract D7C at the 2006 National STD Prevention Conference, May 2006, Jacksonville, FL.
Correspondence: Melanie Taylor MD, MPH, Arizona Department of Health Services, Office of Infectious Disease Services, 150 N. 18th Avenue, Suite 140, Phoenix, AZ 85007-3237. E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org.
Received for publication June 21, 2007, and accepted December 4, 2007.
Conflict of interest: None of the authors of this manuscript have a commercial or other association that might pose a conflict of interest.
The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
A portion of this dataset was used in a multi-city analysis of neurosyphilis incidence. This analysis was published in: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Symptomatic early neurosyphilis among HIV-positive men who have sex with men—Four cities, United States, January 2002–June 2004. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2007;56:625–628.
MANY LARGE URBAN AREAS in the United States are experiencing increases in syphilis rates among men who have sex with men (MSM). Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coinfection ranges from 48% to 75% among these cases.1–5 Neurosyphilis (NS) diagnoses have likewise increased, with many affected persons experiencing significant and sometimes persistent manifestations, particularly those with HIV infection.6,7
National surveillance programs do not track trends in NS, thus increasing numbers of this serious manifestation may occur with minimal public health knowledge or response during periods of increased syphilis morbidity. Some public health surveillance programs have traditionally considered NS as a late manifestation of syphilis infection and thus not counted codiagnosis of NS with early syphilis (ES) in order to prioritize field investigation. However reports of NS occurring during early stages of syphilis have increased during the period of increasing HIV rates8 and MSM syphilis epidemics6,7 indicating the need for better surveillance of this manifestation of syphilis to inform populations at risk. Providers caring for persons with syphilis with or without HIV infection should be aware of the clinical manifestations and current NS screening recommendations to provide adequate care to persons at risk. Public health departments in areas of high syphilis morbidity among MSM should consider the need for heightened surveillance for this manifestation of syphilis.
Because of local field reports of large numbers of syphilis patients experiencing neurologic sequelae during an epidemic of syphilis occurring mainly among MSM in Los Angeles, we performed medical chart reviews to evaluate the epidemiology, clinical presentations (symptomatic vs. asymptomatic), and laboratory findings of NS cases.
Syphilis is a reportable infectious disease in California. Medical providers as well as laboratories are required to report cases of syphilis within 24 hours of diagnosis or receipt of positive laboratory result. Based on standardized annual surveys, laboratory reporting of ES cases in Los Angeles County during the years 2002–2004 was 100% (http://lapublichealth.org/std/reports.htm). To identify NS, syphilis cases and positive laboratory values reported to the health department were reviewed for diagnosis of NS, positive and negative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) venereal disease research laboratory (VDRL) results, and/or treatment for NS. Syphilis cases with available nonreactive CSF VDRL results were reviewed for symptoms of NS and elevated CSF leukocyte counts and protein levels.
Medical chart review was performed for all confirmed and probable cases using a standardized data extraction form to collect data regarding clinical symptoms, laboratory values, treatment information, syphilis stage, and reason for performing a lumbar puncture. Demographic information was obtained from health department databases and medical chart review and included race/ethnicity, age, stage of syphilis, HIV status, and sexual orientation. NS cases older than 65 and congenital syphilis cases were not included in this review to better define NS occurring as a result of the ongoing ES epidemic among MSM.
Medical records were reviewed from the site of the NS diagnosis and/or the site where the patient received clinical follow-up. The diagnosing provider was discerned from the reporting form. The medical record reviews were performed by an infectious disease physician and/or 4 public health nurses. All completed forms were reviewed by the infectious disease physician.
Disease surveillance, data collection, evaluation, and analysis are ongoing public health surveillance activities and thus are not subject to review by institutional review boards or HIPAA regulations.
Confirmed NS was defined as a case of syphilis at any stage in which a reactive VDRL from the CSF was obtained. A probable case of NS was defined as syphilis of any stage with a negative CSF VDRL and both an elevated CSF protein (>50 mg/dL) or CSF leukocyte count (>5 cells/μL) in the absence of other known causes of these abnormalities, and clinical symptoms or signs consistent with NS in the absence of other known causes for these clinical abnormalities.9 Cases that were defined and reported by the medical provider as NS, and that did not meet criteria for confirmed or probable cases were not included in this review.
ES consisted of all reported primary, secondary, and early latent syphilis cases. The diagnosis of primary syphilis was made by the presence of 1 or more ulcers at the site of exposure and the demonstration of exposure to Treponema pallidum by a reactive serologic test for syphilis. Secondary syphilis was diagnosed by the presence of characteristic dermatologic lesions and a reactive nontreponemal test (titer ≥1:4). The diagnosis of early latent syphilis was made in asymptomatic persons with evidence of having acquired the infection within the previous 12 months demonstrated by 1 or more of the following: documented negative test or a 4-fold or greater increase in titer of a nontreponemal test or a history of symptoms consistent with primary or secondary syphilis, a history of sexual exposure to a partner who had independently confirmed ES, or had their only possible exposure during this time period. The diagnosis of late latent syphilis was made in asymptomatic persons with evidence of having acquired the infection >12 months previously. The diagnosis of syphilis of unknown duration was made in asymptomatic persons when the date of infection could not be established as having occurred within the previous year and the patient's age was between 13 and 35 years and the patient's nontreponemal titer was ≥32.9 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) syphilis surveillance case definitions were used for classification of latent syphilis cases with NS as if the NS was not present to reflect the timing of NS diagnosis and duration of syphilis infection.
Public health databases were used to collect rapid plasmin reagin (RPR) and CSF VDRL titers, and syphilis confirmatory testing information. CSF laboratory values including protein, glucose, and leukocyte and erythrocyte counts were collected from public health databases and from medical chart review. HIV viral loads and CD4 counts were collected from medical chart review if they were performed within 12 months of NS diagnosis.
Data were analyzed using SPSS version 12 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Univariate correlates of symptomatic infection were determined by χ2. Statistical analysis of medians was performed using Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric test.
Denominator data for unknown HIV status and sexual orientation among total ES cases were extrapolated by multiplying the number of unknown cases by the proportion of cases with available information of HIV status and sexual orientation and adding this product back to the totals for that group.
Demographics of Syphilis Cases
A total of 7083 cases of syphilis were reported to the Los Angeles County Department of Health during January 2001 to December 2004 (Table 1); 2883 of these were early cases. Of the ES cases, 1505 (52%) had primary or secondary syphilis and 1378 (48%) had early latent syphilis. One thousand eighty-two (38%) of ES cases were white, 469 (16%) were black, and 1147 (40%) were Hispanic. The ages were as follows: 81 (3.0%) <20 years of age; 647 (23%) 20 to 29 years of age, 1174 (41%) 30 to 39 years of age; and 750 (26%) 40 to 49. HIV status was available for 77% of the ES cases. Fifty-six percent (N = 1250) of these ES cases reported being HIV positive. One thousand nine hundred forty-nine (68%) ES cases occurred among MSM; 1149 (59%) of these MSM reported being positive.
Demographics of NS Cases
One hundred twenty-three cases of NS were reported during 2001–2004. One hundred nine cases of confirmed (N = 94, 86%) or probable (N = 15, 14%) NS occurred in persons <65 years of age and were identified for this review. Twenty cases of NS were identified from 2001, 21 from 2002, 37 from 2003, and 31 from 2004. The diagnosis of NS was made by the clinician in 108 (99%) of the cases. NS cases were diagnosed in various clinical settings that included: emergency department 28% (N = 31), hospital 7% (N = 8), private provider office 41% (N = 45) (includes HIV clinics), walk-in clinic 2% (N = 2), STD clinic 0.9% (N = 1), ophthalmology clinic 4% (N = 4), health maintenance organization 10% (N = 11), psychiatric facility 2% (N = 2), information not obtained 5% (N = 5).
The median age of NS cases was 41, 94% were male and 80% of cases were white. Of the male cases (n = 103), 71 (69%) reported having sex with other males (MSM). Thirty-seven (34%) of NS cases were classified as secondary stage, 22 (21%) as early latent stage, 49 (45%) as late latent, and 1 (0.9%) as latent unknown duration (Table 2).
Reported syphilis was associated with confirmed or probable NS in 1.5% of cases (109 of 7083). Symptomatic NS was present in 1.2% of reported syphilis cases (86 of 7083). The incidence of symptomatic NS occurring during early stages of syphilis was 1.5% (42 of 2883). The incidence of symptomatic NS occurring among HIV infected and HIV noninfected persons with ES was 2.1% and 0.6%, respectively. The incidence of asymptomatic NS among HIV-infected persons with ES was 1.1%.
HIV Among Persons With NS
Seventy-four (67%) of the total NS cases were HIV positive. In comparison, the HIV prevalence in overall syphilis cases (primary, secondary, early latent, late latent, and latent unknown duration) without NS was 19%. However, HIV status was not available for 61% of overall syphilis cases. The HIV prevalence in ES cases without NS was 41%. Fifty-one (79%) of these HIV-positive NS cases were symptomatic; 23 (21%) were asymptomatic. The median viral load near the time of diagnosis was 30,165 copies/mL (range <50–>750,000); the median CD4 count was 321 cells/mm3 (range 2–1393). Thirty (41%) of HIV-infected cases were receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy at the time of NS diagnosis (Table 3). Sixty-three (85%) of these HIV-infected cases were MSM. The median CSF white blood cell counts were significantly higher (P = 0.01) and the CD4 counts were significantly lower (P = 0.01) among symptomatic HIV-infected NS cases when compared with asymptomatic HIV-infected cases. The median viral load was somewhat higher among symptomatic HIV-infected NS cases (P = 0.07). There were no significant differences in serum RPR or CSF VDRL titers by highly active antiretroviral therapy status.
Symptomatic and Asymptomatic NS
Eighty-six cases (78%) had neurologic signs or symptoms of NS. Forty-two (49%) of the symptomatic cases occurred during secondary (N = 28) or early latent (N = 14) syphilis. Among NS cases diagnosed during early stages of syphilis, 51 (86%) occurred among HIV-infected patients when compared with 23 (46%) cases diagnosed during late latent syphilis or syphilis of unknown duration.
One hundred percent of the 23 asymptomatic cases were white and HIVpositive. The median RPR value for asymptomatic cases was 1:256 (range 1:2–1:2048). Only 2 (9%) asymptomatic cases had RPR values <1:32.
One hundred six (97%) of NS cases received treatment with a CDC-recommended or CDC recommended alternative course of therapy10: 88 (81%) with aqueous penicillin (PCN) G, 13 (12%) with intramuscularly procaine PCN G and 5 (5%) were treated with intravenously ceftriaxone. Non-CDC-recommended therapies included intravenously ampicillin (N = 1), 3 intramuscular doses of benzathine PCN (N = 1). One patient had no treatment information available. Thirteen of the cases that received aqueous PCN G, 2 of the cases that received procaine PCN, and 3 of the patients that received ceftriaxone received 3 intramuscular injections of benzathine PCN after the initial treatment regimen.
History of Previous Diagnosis and Treatment for Syphilis
Seventeen percent of cases (N = 19) of NS had a health department-reported history of syphilis by health department record review. Thirteen of these cases had been diagnosed and treated for syphilis within 2 years of the current NS diagnosis. Ten of these 13 were HIV positive; 6 of the 13 did not receive a recommended treatment regimen appropriate for the stage of syphilis. One of these 6 had received 1.2 million units of procaine PCN/1.2 million units of benzathine PCN (Bicillin CR).11 Five of the 13 cases had experienced neurologic symptoms at the time of the previous syphilis diagnosis; 8 did not have neurologic symptoms. Only 3 of these 5 were treated with a CDC-recommended regimen for NS.10 Of the 8 without neurologic symptoms, 7 (88%) had an RPR titer at the time of previous diagnosis of ≥1:32. Five of the 13 cases diagnosed and treated for syphilis within 2 years of the current NS diagnosis were suggestive of treatment failure in which they did not report additional sexual exposure (reinfection) and they received a CDC-recommended regimen of treatment appropriate for the stage of syphilis infection. All of these cases were HIV positive representing 7% of HIV-infected NS cases.
Among overall cases of NS in this review, symptomatic NS was frequently diagnosed in early stages of syphilis with a higher incidence seen among HIV-infected persons when compared with HIV noninfected persons in Los Angeles. This review summarizes the epidemiology and clinical and laboratory findings of these NS cases diagnosed in a large urban setting during a syphilis outbreak among MSM. This review suggests the need for awareness on the part of HIV clinical providers as well as public health surveillance personnel regarding the identification and referral for diagnosis and treatment of persons at risk for NS.
The majority of the symptomatic and all of the asymptomatic NS cases in this review were HIV positive and were diagnosed during early stages of syphilis. Limited studies of HIV-infected persons have reported a more rapid progression to NS during ES stages than in HIV noninfected persons.12,13 Some clinical evidence suggests that HIV-infected persons with serum RPR titers of >1:32 and/or CD4 counts <350 may be at greater risk of having laboratory confirmed NS regardless of whether neurologic symptoms are present.14,15 The majority of the asymptomatic NS cases in this review, all of whom were HIV positive, had RPR titers >1:32. High clinical suspicion for NS and/or CSF testing in HIV-infected patients with syphilis and neurologic symptoms is warranted regardless of stage because of the severe manifestations that may result and persist despite treatment. Routine testing of HIV-infected persons for syphilis is recommended as part of routine care with more frequent testing being recommended for HIV-infected persons engaging in sexual risk behaviors.16 HIV providers should maintain high clinical suspicion for NS among patients engaging in sexual risk behaviors that present with neurologic symptoms.
We identified 5 HIV-infected patients that had been diagnosed and treated for syphilis within a year of presentation with NS. Data from public health investigator interviews did not indicate sexual re-exposure in these cases. These patients may have experienced treatment failure, reinfection, or perhaps may have had NS at the time of previous syphilis diagnosis but had not received CSF testing, and thus did not receive treatment adequate for NS. Some data suggests that patients with HIV infection may have a greater likelihood of treatment failure as defined by serologic criteria,17 and clinical relapse.18 Larger studies have not found HIV status to affect syphilis cure rates.19,20 HIV-infected patients may have persistently abnormal CSF findings even after appropriate NS treatment when compared with HIV-negative persons.21 Considering these findings, it is relevant to query the adequacy of current NS screening and treatment recommendations as well as whether abnormal CSF findings are related to syphilis.
Many of the asymptomatic cases were diagnosed during early stages of syphilis, reflecting the high indices of suspicion for NS by many Los Angeles HIV providers caring for patients with syphilis. Controversy persists in the diagnosis of NS because of the low sensitivity of the CSF-VDRL,22 the difficulty in interpreting elevated CSF leukocyte counts in HIV-infected persons,23 and the dilemma of whether to screen for NS in HIV-infected patients with ES and without neurologic symptoms. CDC STD treatment guidelines recommend the performance of a lumbar puncture and CSF examination for patients that are HIV infected and have late latent syphilis, patients with reactive syphilis serology and neurologic symptoms and those with evidence of treatment failure.10 These data reveal that many NS cases both symptomatic and asymptomatic were diagnosed during early stages of syphilis, suggesting the need for more formal guidance for clinicians caring for HIV-infected patients with syphilis regarding the performance of lumbar punctures in asymptomatic patients with ES.
This analysis of notifiable disease surveillance data was subject to several limitations. There was no active case finding; thus these data are subject to reporting biases. Sample selection limited our ability to identify significant correlates of NS diagnosis as we did not compare NS cases to syphilis cases without NS. Sample size limited our ability to identify significant correlates of symptomatic NS. We were not able to make predictions regarding HIV status and clinical presentations of NS as our sample was predominantly HIV positive. An underestimate of NS likely resulted from the exclusion of syphilis cases with neurologic symptoms that did not receive CSF testing (suspect cases) and late stage syphilis cases that had positive CSF findings that were not reported by the laboratory or provider. Denominator values for ES were likely underestimated as well given some cases of syphilis were not identified in early stages. Selection bias may have resulted in an overestimation of NS incidence rates if HIV-infected persons were more likely to have received a lumbar puncture. Also, asymptomatic syphilis patients may not routinely receive CSF testing thus diagnosis of asymptomatic NS reflects variation in clinical practices. Extrapolated values for HIV status and sexual orientation may have biased incidence calculations as these missing values may represent a dissimilar distribution.
These data suggest the need for providers to consider NS and the performance of a lumbar puncture in early stages of syphilis, specifically in HIV-infected patients. In addition to providers, public health departments with high rates of syphilis among MSM should consider the need for heightened surveillance for NS. Information regarding trends in this manifestation should be disseminated among providers caring for persons with syphilis and/or HIV as well as community-based organizations that provide education to persons at risk for syphilis. Prevention messages related to syphilis should include information regarding NS as a manifestation that may result in neurologic deficits.
1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Trends in primary and secondary syphilis and HIV infections in men who have sex with men—San Francisco and Los Angeles, California, 1998–2002. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2004; 53:575–578.
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Primary and secondary syphilis among men who have sex with men—New York City, 2001. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2002; 51:853–856.
3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Resurgent bacterial sexually transmitted disease among men who have sex with men—King County, Washington, 1997–1999. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1999; 48:773–777.
4. Ciesielski CA. Sexually transmitted disease in men who have sex with men: An epidemiologic review. Curr Infect Dis Rep 2003; 5:145–152.
5. D'Souza G, Lee JH, Paffel JM. Outbreak of syphilis among men who have sex with men in Houston, Texas. Sex Transm Dis 2003; 30:872–873.
6. Wong W, Kent CK, Kohn R, et al. Neurosyphilis—San Francisco, 2002. Abstract 0460. Paper presented at: International Society for Sexually Transmitted Diseases Research Congress; 2003; Ottawa, Canada.
7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Symptomatic early neurosyphilis among HIV-positive men who have sex with men—Four cities, United States, January 2002–June 2004. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2007; 56:625–628.
8. Flood JM, Weinstock HS, Guroy ME, et al. Neurosyphilis during the AIDS epidemic, San Francisco, 1985–1992. J Infect Dis 1998; 177:931–940.
10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Inadvertent use of Bicillin C-R to treat syphilis infection—Los Angeles, 2004; product warning labels instituted. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2005; 54:217–219.
11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually Transmitted Diseases Treatment Guidelines, 2006. MMWR Recomm Rep 2006; 55(RR 11):29.
12. Musher DM, Hamill RJ, Baughn RE. Effect of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection on the course of syphilis and on the response to treatment. Ann Intern Med 1990; 113:872–881.
13. Johns D, Tierney M, Felsenstein D. Alteration in the national history of neurosyphilis by concurrent infection with the human immunodeficiency virus. N Engl J Med 1987; 316:1569–1572.
14. Marra CM, Maxwell CL, Smith SL, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid abnormalities in patients with syphilis: Association with clinical and laboratory features. J Infect Dis 2004; 189:369–376.
15. Libois A, De Wit S, Poll B, et al. HIV and syphilis: When to perform a lumbar puncture. Sex Transm Dis 2007; 34:141–144.
16. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Incorporating HIV. Prevention into the medical care of persons living with HIV: Recommendations of CDC, the Health Resources and Services Administration, the National Institutes of Health, and the HIV Medicine Association of the Infectious Disease Society of America. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2003; 52:1–32.
17. Rolfs RT, Joesoef MR, Hendershot EF, et al. A randomized trial of enhanced therapy for early syphilis in patients with and without human immunodeficiency virus infection. N Engl J Med 1997; 337:307–314.
18. Gordon SM, Eaton ME, George R, et al. The response of symptomatic neurosyphilis to high-dose intravenous pencillin G in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. N Engl J Med 1994; 331:1469–1473.
19. Kiddugavu MG, Kiwanuka N, Wawer MJ, et al. Effectiveness of syphilis treatment using azithromycin and/or benzathine penicillin in Rakai, Uganda. Sex Transm Dis 2005; 32:1–6.
20. Long CM, Klausner JD, Leon S, et al. Syphilis treatment and HIV infection in a population-based study of persons at high risk for sexually transmitted disease/HIV infection in Lima, Peru. Sex Transm Dis 2006; 33:151–155.
21. Marra CM, Maxwell CL, Tantalo L, et al. Normalization of cerebrospinal fluid abnormalities after neurosyphilis therapy: Does HIV status matter? Clin Infect Dis 2004; 38:1001–1006.
22. Marra CM, Tantalo LC, Maxwell CL, et al. Alternative cerebrospinal fluid tests to diagnose neurosyphilis in HIV-infected individuals. Neurology 2004; 63:85–88.
23. Appleman ME, Marshall DW, Brey RL, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid abnormalities in patients without AIDS who are seropositive for the human immunodeficiency virus. J Infect Dis 1988; 158:193–199.