Skip Navigation LinksHome > October 2002 - Volume 29 - Issue 10 > NAAT–Identified and Self-Reported Gonorrhea and Chlamydial I...
Sexually Transmitted Diseases:
Article

NAAT–Identified and Self-Reported Gonorrhea and Chlamydial Infections: Different At-Risk Population Subgroups?

ROGERS, SUSAN M. PhD*; MILLER, HEATHER G. PhD*; MILLER, WILLIAM C. MD, PhD, MPH†; ZENILMAN, JONATHAN M. MD‡; TURNER, CHARLES F. PhD*§

Free Access
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

From the *Program in Health and Behavior Measurement, Research Triangle Institute, Washington, DC; †School of Medicine and Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; ‡School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; and §City University of New York, Queens College and Graduate Center, Flushing, New York

The authors thank Dr. Jonathan Ellen for his review of an earlier version of the manuscript.

Supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants R01-HD31067 and RO1-MH56318 (to Dr. Turner); the Research Triangle Institute; grant RR00046 from the Clinical Associate Physician Program of the General Clinical Research Center, Division of Research Resources, NIH (to Dr. W. Miller); and NIH grants K24AI01633 and UI9AI38533 (to Dr. Zenilman). Abbott Laboratories donated some of the LCR test kits used in this study.

Reprint requests: Susan M. Rogers, PhD, Program in Health and Behavior Measurement, Research Triangle Institute, 1615 M Street NW, Washington, DC 20036. E-mail: smr@rti.org

Received for publication September 21, 2001,

revised December 19, 2001, and accepted December 26, 2001.

Collapse Box

Abstract

Background: Information on the characteristics and behaviors of persons at high risk for gonorrhea and chlamydial infection has typically been derived from studies of sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinic populations. The Baltimore STD and Behavior Survey (BSBS) used urine-based nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) to assess the prevalence and behavioral correlates of gonorrhea and chlamydial infection in a population-based cross-sectional survey of adults in Baltimore, Maryland.

Goal: The goal of this study was to examine the demographic characteristics and behavioral markers of gonorrhea and chlamydial infection as reported by adults with a self-reported history of gonorrhea and chlamydial infection and to compare these to the characteristics and behaviors of individuals with current NAAT-identified gonorrhea and/or chlamydial infection.

Study Design: A probability sample of adults aged 18 to 35 years residing in Baltimore was evaluated with collection of urine specimens and administration of a health and behavior survey. Data and specimens were collected between January 1997 and September 1998.

Results: Respondents with NAAT-detected gonorrhea and/or chlamydial infection (7.9%) did not report a history of high-risk behaviors or more recent occurrences of those behaviors, and the majority were asymptomatic. However, adults in our study who self-reported a history of infection (26.0%) were more likely than those with no history of infection to report multiple partners, paid sex, partners with prior STDs, and STD symptoms—a pattern consistent with findings described in previous clinic-based reports.

Conclusion: The risk profile generated from studies of clinic populations, with a focus on symptomatic disease, may not characterize the broader population with current, untreated, largely asymptomatic infection.

BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS to prevent the acquisition and transmission of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) focus on modifying sexual and health behaviors. Information on the behaviors of individuals at greater risk of exposure and transmission has typically been generated from studies of STD, family planning, or other clinic populations. Clinic-based studies, which include diagnostic STD testing, have identified correlates of infection such as recent symptoms, young age, multiple sex partners, new partners, and inconsistent condom use. Results of these studies, however, may not be generalizable beyond the defined clinic population. Furthermore, individuals with asymptomatic infection or limited access to health care may not be adequately represented.

Population-based studies permit inferences to a broader population and may provide insights into the epidemiology of STDs that complement our understanding of infection prevalence and transmission behaviors from clinic studies. 1–3 However, because of the costs and logistical difficulties associated with obtaining clinical measures of current infection status, most population-based studies have involved assessment of self-reports of previously diagnosed STDs and associated risk behaviors.

Self-reports of previous STDs underestimate the true prevalence of infection. Many infections are asymptomatic. Clinicians outside of public health STD clinics frequently fail to evaluate their patients routinely for these infections and rarely assess patients’ risk for STDs. 4 The social stigma attached to sexually transmitted infections may inhibit some individuals from seeking health care or reporting a diagnosis in a survey. 5 Furthermore, respondents may not recall or may misunderstand a previous diagnosis. Among 905 adult patients attending an STD clinic in Baltimore during 2000 to 2001, for example, 18.6% reported they had heard of genital phlemoria, a fictitious disease, and two patients reported a history of this disease (unpublished data). Consequently, our knowledge of the distribution of sexually transmitted infections (both symptomatic and asymptomatic) in the general population and of the behaviors that cause their transmission is far from complete.

The Baltimore STD and Behavior Survey (BSBS) used urine-based nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) for Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection and Chlamydia trachomatis infection to assess prevalence of current infection in a population-based study while simultaneously collecting information on health, STD-related risk behaviors, and previous STD history. We examined correlates of gonorrhea and chlamydial infection as reported by respondents with a self-reported history of gonorrhea and chlamydial infection and compared these with the characteristics and behaviors of individuals with a current NAAT-identified infection.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Data and Methods

Study Population

The target population for the BSBS was defined as English-speaking adults 18 to 45 years of age residing in households in the city of Baltimore, Maryland. 6,7 The sample was derived from a probability sample of residences selected from a real estate property registry compiled by the city for tax purposes. Interviewers successfully screened 2727 (85.7%) of the 3182 eligible households. Of the 1224 adults between the ages of 18 and 45 years identified as eligible for interviewing, 1014 consented to participate and to complete the survey questionnaire. According to study protocol, respondents aged 18 to 35 years were also asked to provide a urine sample for NAAT testing for gonorrhea and chlamydial infection; 579 (79.5%) of the 728 age-eligible respondents completed the survey questionnaire and provided a urine specimen, 119 (16.3%) refused to provide a urine specimen, and 30 (4.1%) provided a specimen that was untested because of inadequate volume or logistical complications.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Survey Administration

Verbal and written consent was obtained from all subjects aged 18 to 45 years who completed the survey interview. The questionnaire collected information on sexual behavior, STD history, STD symptoms, drug and alcohol use, and individual background characteristics. Survey data were collected by a trained interviewer in a private location in the respondent's home. Respondents were randomly assigned to receive either an audio computer-assisted self-interview (audio-CASI) or computer-assisted personal interview (CAPI) that included some questions to be completed on a self-administered questionnaire. 8 For the current analyses, data are aggregated from both interview modes. The entire survey was designed to take approximately 30 minutes to complete.

Additional details of the sample design and survey execution are published elsewhere. 6

Back to Top | Article Outline
Urine Collection and STD Testing

Individuals between the ages of 18 and 35 years who completed the interview were asked to provide a urine specimen to be tested for gonorrhea and chlamydial infection. In this second stage of the informed consent process, it was made explicit that the urine was not to be used for drug testing and that, in compliance with state law, specimens found positive for gonorrhea and/or chlamydial infection would be reported to the Baltimore City Health Department.

Urine specimens were processed at The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. Ligase chain reaction (LCR) assays for both pathogens were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL). For nearly all positive tests, results were confirmed by means of retesting of the same assay. Retest findings were not available for three persons who initially tested positive; these cases were considered positive on the basis of the initial testing.

Respondents were provided a telephone number to call to learn of their test results. Study staff members successfully contacted 69% of positive respondents (via telephone or registered letter signed by respondent). If telephone contact was not made and a registered letter was returned undelivered, a first class letter was sent. Free treatment at one of the city's public health STD clinics was offered to all contacted participants.

The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Research Triangle Institute and the Joint Committee on Clinical Investigations of the Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Data Analysis

We compared the sexual and health-related risk behaviors associated with two primary gonorrhea/chlamydial infection outcomes: current NAAT-identified infection and a self-reported history of infection. Current gonorrhea/chlamydial infections were identified at the time of participation in the survey by the urine LCR assay. History of gonorrhea/chlamydial infection was determined from self-reported information gathered on the survey questionnaire. Specifically, respondents were asked, “Have you ever heard of a disease called gonorrhea?” and if so, “Has a doctor or nurse ever told you that you had gonorrhea, or ‘clap’?” An identical set of questions was asked for chlamydial infection. For each infection recognized, respondents were asked to provide information on the number of times an infection had been detected, when the most recent infection occurred (within the past week, between 1 and 4 weeks ago, between 1 and 6 months ago, between 7 and 12 months ago, or >1 year ago) and whether medical treatment was obtained. From these responses, it was possible to generate self-reported estimates of previous gonorrhea and/or chlamydial infection, as well as to determine when the most recent diagnosis had been made (and thus when treatment had occurred). In deriving these estimates, we assumed that respondents who had never heard of the disease had never had it diagnosed. Alternatively, we could have assumed that infection rates were equivalent between respondents who had and had not heard of the infection. This alternative procedure—treating the information from respondents who had never heard of gonorrhea and chlamydia as missing in our analyses—produced nearly identical results in our statistical analyses. Tabulations derived from this procedure are not presented.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Statistical Procedures

The analyses are based on cross-sectional data from the 579 respondents who completed the survey questionnaire and provided a urine specimen for gonorrhea and chlamydial infection testing. Analyses examined demographic and behavioral risk factors separately for each gonorrhea/chlamydial infection outcome, i.e., current NAAT-detected infection and self-reported treated infection. Independent variables analyzed as possible predictors of infection included sexual risk practices, partner selection, STD-related symptoms, condom use, and health care behaviors, including antibiotic use. Prevalence odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% CIs were obtained for each bivariate relationship. We subsequently calculated adjusted ORs by means of multiple logistic regression to control for demographic characteristics (race, sex, education, marital status, and age) and interview mode. Additional multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to model the likelihood of each outcome measure, on the basis of a range of sociodemographic and behavioral predictors collected in the survey interview.

Our household survey utilized a complex sample design that oversampled subpopulations known to have higher rates of infection. Poststratification adjustments were applied to align the survey estimates with the 1997 census population estimates (by age, sex, and race). Sample weights were then used during analysis to adjust for the differing probabilities of sample selection and survey nonresponse. In all bivariate tests and multivariate regression analyses, we used software (Stata 6.0; Stata Corp., College Station, TX) 9 that adjusts the variances of our survey estimates to take into account our complex sample design.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Results

The study population was predominantly African American and had an approximately equal distribution of males and females (Table 1). The majority of respondents were never married, and a substantial proportion of respondents reported some education beyond high school.

Table 1
Table 1
Image Tools

Of the 579 respondents, 49 were positive by urine-based LCR for gonorrhea or chlamydial infection, yielding an overall weighted prevalence estimate of 7.9% (SE = 1.6). Of the 49 positive assays, 33 were positive for N gonorrhoeae (5.3%; SE = 1.4), 18 were positive for C trachomatis (3.0%; SE = 0.8), and 2 were positive for both gonorrhea and chlamydial infection (0.4%; SE = 0.3).

The estimate of self-reported lifetime gonorrhea or chlamydial infection, as determined by interview, was 26.0% (SE = 2.5). Previous gonococcal infections were reported by 15.2% of respondents (SE = 2.2); 15.1% reported prior chlamydial infection (SE = 1.9). More respondents had heard of gonorrhea (89.7%) than had heard of chlamydial infection (79.7%;P < 0.001). Only 4.1% of adults in our sample had never heard of either infection.

Twelve respondents with a positive NAAT assay also reported prior gonorrhea and/or chlamydial infection. One respondent with a currently identified chlamydial infection reported previous gonorrhea, diagnosed within the past 6 months; for the remaining 11 subjects, previous infections with a different pathogen occurred >1 year ago. Reinfections were more common among those with current gonorrhea (n = 9) than among those with current chlamydial infection (n = 3).

Race, marital status, and education were significantly associated with self-reported infection. Race and sex were associated with NAAT-identified infections. Age and interview mode were not associated with our gonorrhea/chlamydial infection outcomes in this sample of study respondents.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Correlates of Prior Treated Infection

In comparison with respondents who reported no prior infection, adults with a self-reported history of gonorrhea and/or chlamydial infection were more likely to report several classic STD risk behaviors (Table 2). Nearly two thirds of respondents (61.8%) with a prior gonorrhea/chlamydial infection reported six or more lifetime partners, compared with 45.8% of those who had never had one of these infections (adjusted OR = 1.8; 95% CI, 1.0–3.1). Respondents with a history of gonorrhea/chlamydial infection were also more likely to report having a main partner with an STD than were those with no such previous infection (adjusted OR = 4.7; 95% CI, 1.9–11.3). Self-reported gonorrhea and/or chlamydial infection was positively associated with several measures of risky sexual practices. Compared with respondents without a prior infection, respondents with a previously detected infection were significantly more likely to report anal sex (adjusted OR = 2.3; 95% CI, 1.2–4.3), a one-night stand (adjusted OR = 2.8; 95% CI, 1.5–5.0), forced sex (adjusted OR = 2.5; 95% CI, 1.4–4.5), and paid sex (adjusted OR = 3.7; 95% CI, 1.9–7.4).

Table 2
Table 2
Image Tools

Douching after sex (adjusted OR = 2.3; 95% CI, 1.2–4.3) was more frequently reported by women with a history of gonorrhea/chlamydial infection than by women who did not report such a history. A history of pelvic inflammatory disease (adjusted OR = 3.3; 95% CI, 1.0–11.1) was marginally associated with self-reported gonorrhea or chlamydial infection after adjustments for respondent characteristics and interview mode. Recent use of antibiotics and use of alcohol or drugs (data not shown) were not significantly associated with a history of gonorrhea and/or chlamydial infection. Nearly three fourths (74%) of respondents with previous gonorrhea or chlamydial infection reported a history of dysuria or discharge, versus 33% of those with no previous infection (adjusted OR = 6.6; 95% CI, 3.5–12.3).

Back to Top | Article Outline
Multivariate analyses.

African American men and women and individuals with less than a high school education were more likely to report a history of gonorrhea and/or chlamydial infection when other risk factors or markers were controlled for in multivariate analyses (Table 3, Model 1). Respondents (1) whose main sexual partner within the past year had a previous STD infection, (2) who had engaged in paid sex, and (3) who had symptoms of infection, dysuria, or discharge were also significantly associated with self-reported infection in multivariable models.

Table 3
Table 3
Image Tools
Back to Top | Article Outline
Multiple self-reported infections.

To assess further the associations between reported risk behaviors and previous infections, we examined the behavioral characteristics of respondents reporting a history of multiple (two or more) episodes of gonorrhea and/or chlamydial infection. Multiple or repeated STDs may indicate persistent risky sexual behaviors. We compared estimates of reported risk behaviors among respondents with two or more previous gonococcal or chlamydial infections to those for persons who reported a single previous diagnosis. Among respondents with a history of infection, 35 (26.8%) reported at least two diagnoses and treatments for gonorrhea and/or chlamydial infection. In comparison with respondents with a single previous infection, respondents with multiple previous infections were more likely to report paid sex (OR = 4.1; 95% CI, 1.5–11.4), forced sex (OR = 3.1; 95% CI, 1.2–8.3), and antibiotic use within the past 6 months (OR = 3.2; 95% CI, 1.2–8.3). No differences were observed in reports of number of sex partners, other sexual practices, or related symptoms.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Correlates of Current NAAT-Identified Infection

In contrast to findings from the analysis of self-reported infections, current NAAT-diagnosed infections were not associated with classic risk behaviors or more recent such behaviors in bivariate analyses (Table 4). Multiple partners, new partners within the past year, and other measures of recent sexual practices were not significantly associated with current infection, after statistical adjustments for mode of interview and demographic characteristics. Recent use of antibiotics was less frequently reported by respondents with a current infection, although the difference was of borderline significance (adjusted OR = 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2–1.1).

Table 4
Table 4
Image Tools

The majority (94.7%) of NAAT-identified infections were asymptomatic. Only 2.1% of subjects with a current infection reported dysuria (adjusted OR = 0.2; 95% CI, 0.04–1.1), and only 3.2% reported discharge within the past 6 months (adjusted OR = 0.3; 95% CI, 0.1–1.3). Recent symptoms were reported by respondents with current gonorrhea only; all of the respondents with a current chlamydial infection were asymptomatic within the past 6 months. Nearly 9 in 10 respondents (88.7%) with current NAAT-identified infections reported no symptoms within the past year.

A history of dysuria or discharge was negatively associated with a positive NAAT assay (adjusted OR = 0.5, 95% CI = 0.2–1.0). One possible explanation of this finding is that respondents with symptoms are more likely to seek treatment and therefore would be less likely to test positive by the NAAT assay.

Adding controls for measures of recent behavioral risk had no discernible impact on the detection of a current, untreated infection in multivariate analyses (Table 3, Model 2). The protective effect of recent antibiotic use remained of borderline significance (OR = 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2–1.1), a finding suggesting that the use of antibiotics may have inadvertently treated or cured an asymptomatic or undiagnosed infection.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Recently treated infections.

Respondents with a history of recently diagnosed and treated infection may be more likely to report recent symptoms or behaviors associated with that infection than those with no history of infection. To control for this possibility, we examined the relationship between reported risk behaviors and NAAT-identified infections, excluding from the tabulations any persons receiving treatment for gonorrhea and/or chlamydial infection within the past year (n = 559). Adjusted ORs were similar to those presented in Table 4 and are not shown. None of the behavioral characteristics we measured were significantly associated with current untreated infection in these analyses.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Discussion

This study is one of the first to assess the performance of classic STD risk factors in predicting the prevalence of NAAT-identified gonococcal and chlamydial infections in a probability sample of the general population. Our results suggest that the risk profile generated from clinic studies may not characterize the broader population with current, untreated, largely asymptomatic gonorrhea and chlamydial infection. Studies of clinic or other high-risk populations typically include individuals seeking care for symptoms of recently acquired infection. 10,11 In those studies, recent at-risk behaviors have been associated with symptomatic disease. Our data suggest that respondents with NAAT-detected infections did not have a history of high-risk behaviors, nor did they report more recent occurrences of those behaviors, and very few reported symptoms. Nearly 95% of adults with NAAT-identified infection reported no symptoms within the past 6 months. Only 11.3% reported dysuria or discharge within the past year. The absence of a history of risk and symptoms leaves few—if any—cues to stimulate treatment-seeking behavior. In contrast, self-reports of past infection were associated with multiple partners, paid sex, partners with prior STDs, and STD symptoms–a pattern consistent with previous clinic-based reports. These data suggest that there are at least two adult populations that we need to target to better understand factors contributing to the sustained prevalence of C trachomatis and N gonorrhoeae in American communities.

Empirical data on the duration of untreated asymptomatic infection are limited, but some untreated gonorrhea and chlamydial infections are believed to persist for months, or even years, particularly in women. 12–14 Without knowing the duration of infection, recent behaviors may or may not be indicative of risk for asymptomatic infections currently detected by NAAT in cross-sectional analyses. One possible interpretation of our results is that some infections identified by NAAT may reflect persistent infections. The lack of symptoms and the insignificant correlation between the likelihood of NAAT-identified infection and recent risk behaviors support this possibility. It is conceivable that such infections may be associated with low organism burden or perhaps amplifiable DNA from previous infections that have not been cleared. This interpretation is derived from the same factors that account for the increased sensitivity of the assay—extremely low limits of detection (approximately 1–10 organisms in a milliliter of sample) and the ability to detect DNA from nonviable organisms. Alternatively, undetected asymptomatic infection may suggest partial resolution or incomplete clearance of infection associated with suppression of an immune response 15 or infection by a particular organism strain that produces symptoms less often. 16

Whether these results may be replicated in other populations with different characteristics, STD risk, and levels of infection remains to be determined. Our study was restricted to data collection in one city, and results must be confirmed in other urban populations. Data from the 1995 National Survey of Adolescent Males (NSAM), however, tend to corroborate our findings. The NSAM collected both urine specimens for gonorrhea and chlamydial testing and self-reported STD and behavioral data on a representative sample of young men in the United States. 3 In that study, 3.1% of young males aged 18 to 19 years and 4.5% of those aged 22 to 26 years tested positive for chlamydial infection on the basis of urine-based polymerase chain reaction. Ninety-two percent of infected subjects reported no symptoms in the past year. Preliminary analyses of NSAM suggest that the behavioral determinants of infection were clearly different for respondents testing positive for chlamydial infection and respondents with a self-reported history of STD infection. Among males not living with a partner, certain factors (having frequent and more recent one-night stands, multiple partners, concurrent partnerships in the past year, and STD symptoms) were significantly associated with a previous STD but were not associated with NAAT-identified chlamydial infection in multivariate analyses. 17

The intervals chosen for assessing behavioral contributions to the risk of gonorrhea and chlamydial infection may have influenced the associations we observed in this study. We attempted to minimize effects of differences between the timing of a reported behavior and the timing of infection by restricting our assessment of potential risk factors to behaviors occurring within the past year or, if such measurements were available, the past 6 months. Ideally, measures would have been collected on behaviors occurring within the recent past, i.e., 1 to 2 years, when some of the NAAT-identified infections may have occurred. It also was not possible to examine multivariable models of behavioral risk among respondents with infection diagnosed and treated within the past year, because we were limited by small sample sizes.

Given a larger sample, it may have been possible to investigate differences in reported behaviors for gonorrhea and chlamydial infections separately. It is generally believed that chlamydial infections are more often asymptomatic than gonorrhea. None of the respondents with an NAAT-identified chlamydial infection in our sample reported symptoms within the past 6 months.

Similarly, it must be recognized that our ability to detect differences in behavioral risk could be related to the statistical power available. Because the prevalence of gonorrhea and chlamydial infection within the general population is low, the statistical power to detect an association between our modeled behavioral variables and current, NAAT-identified infection status is attenuated. We note, however, that most of the estimated ORs in analyses of current infection are opposite in direction from those found for past infection status, and the remaining ORs are clustered around 1.0 (range, 0.2–1.6).

The BSBS collected limited information on respondents’ sex partners. Although information was obtained on the number of partners and a respondent's relationship with the most recent partner, survey data did not indicate whether the respondent's partners had current or recent gonorrhea or chlamydial infection, nor did the survey investigate the partners’ sexual activities. Ideally, urine specimens would have been collected and tested and behavioral information (on their own sexual and STD history) would have been gathered from the partners.

Although the enhanced diagnostic capabilities of amplification tests are well-recognized, 18 the epidemiologic significance of certain infections detected by NAAT remains less well understood. As use of NAAT becomes more widespread, our knowledge of the behavioral epidemiology associated with risk for these infections will undoubtedly improve. Understanding the significance of infections detected by nucleic acid amplification has important public health implications, including defining the burden of disease within a community and refining our efforts to detect and treat infection beyond clinical settings that rely on symptomatic individuals to seek diagnosis and treatment.

Back to Top | Article Outline

References

1. Turner CF, Miller HG, Moses LE. AIDS, Sexual Behavior, IV Drug Use. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1989.

2. Miller HG, Turner CF, Moses LE, eds. AIDS. The Second Decade. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1990.

3. Ku L, St. Louis M, Farshy C, et al. Risk behaviors, medical care, and chlamydial infection among young men in the United States. Am J Public Health 2002; 92: 1140–1143.

4. Institute of Medicine. The Hidden Epidemic: Confronting Sexually Transmitted Diseases. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1996.

5. Brandt A. No Magic Bullet. New York: Oxford University Press, 1987.

6. Turner CF, Rogers SM, Miller HG, et al. Untreated gonococcal and chlamydial infection in a probability sample of Baltimore adults. JAMA 2002; 287: 726–733.

7. Turner CF, Gribble JN, Al-Tayyib AA, Chromy JR. Falsification in epidemiologic surveys: detection and remediation. Presented at the ORI-NIH-AAAS-AAMC-NSF Conference on Research Integrity, Bethesda, MD, November 18–20, 2000.

8. Al-Tayyib A, Rogers SM, Gribble JN, Villarroel M, Turner CF. Effect of low medical literacy on health survey measurements. Am J Public Health. In press.

9. Stata Corp. Stata Statistical Software, Release 6.0. College Station, TX: Stata Corporation, 1999.

10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV prevention through early detection and treatment of other sexually transmitted diseases: United States. MMWR Morb Mortal Weekly Rep 1998; 47 (RR-12):1–24.

11. Irwin DE, Thomas JC, Spitter CE, et al. Self-treatment patterns among clients attending sexually transmitted disease clinics and the effect of self-treatment on STD symptom duration. Sex Transm Dis 1997; 24 (6): 372–377.

12. Dean D, Suchland RJ, Stamm WE. Evidence for long-term cervical persistence of Chlamydia trachomatis by omp1 genotyping. J Infect Dis 2000; 182: 909–916.

13. Hook EW, Handsfield HH. Gonococcal infections in the adult. In: KK Holmes, PF Sparling, P Mardh, et al, eds. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1999:451–466.

14. Stamm WE. Chlamydia trachomatis infections of the adult. In: KK Holmes, PF Sparling, P Mardh, et al, eds. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1999:407–422.

15. Parks KS, Dixon PB, Richey CM, Hook EW. Spontaneous clearance of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in untreated patients. Sex Transm Dis 1997; 24: 229–235.

16. Whittington LH, Holmes KK. Unique gonococcal phenotype associated with asymptomatic infection in men and with erroneous diagnosis of nongonococcal urethritis. J Infect Dis 2000; 181: 1044–1048.

17. Gates G, Sonenstein F, Rogers SM, Lindberg LL. Differential risk factors associated with STD infection in young men. Presented at the 2001 meeting of the Population Association of America, March 29–31, 2001, Washington, DC.

18. Schacter J. Chlamydia trachomatis: the more you look, the more you find. How much is there? Sex Transm Dis 1998; 25: 229–231.

© Copyright 2002 American Sexually Transmitted Diseases Association

Login