Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Share this article on:

New Xpress Sexually Transmissible Infection Screening Clinic Improves Patient Journey and Clinic Capacity at a Large Sexual Health Clinic

Knight, Vickie MHSEd*; Ryder, Nathan MPH, TM; Guy, Rebecca PhD; Lu, Heng MComSc*; Wand, Handan PhD; McNulty, Anna MMed

Sexually Transmitted Diseases: January 2013 - Volume 40 - Issue 1 - p 75–80
doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3182793700
The Real World of STD Prevention

Introduction In December 2010, a new “express” testing service (Xpress) was implemented alongside routine clinics at a large sexual health clinic. Xpress involved a computer-assisted self-interview, self-collected samples and enrolled nurse staffing. We evaluated the impact of the service on patient journey, staff costs, and clinical capacity.

Methods In the first 5 months of Xpress, we calculated the median waiting time and length of stay, staff hours and costs, and utilization. We compared these attributes to the same months in the previous year.

Results In the Xpress period, 5335 patients were seen (705 in the Xpress clinic, 4630 in routine clinic), 11% more than the 4804 in the before period. Staff hours were 13% greater in the Xpress period compared with the before period (3567 vs. 3151). The cost per patient seen in the Xpress period was lower compared with the before period ($26.79 compared with $28.48). The median waiting time in the Xpress period was 19 minutes (interquartile range, 8–36; 10 in Xpress clinic and 17 in routine clinics) compared with 23 in the before period (P < 0.01). The median length of stay in the Xpress period was 40 minutes (interquartile range, 27–58; 21 in Xpress clinic and 40 in routine clinics) compared with 43 in the before period (P < 0.01). The utilization rates were 67% in the Xpress period (40% in the Xpress clinic and 74% in routine clinics) compared with 76% in the before period (P < 0.01).

Conclusion The Xpress clinic improved the patient journey, and although not fully used, more patients were seen overall in the clinic with minimal additional costs. Marketing of the Xpress clinic is underway.

An evaluation of an express sexually transmissible infection screening service demonstrated that the patient journey was reduced, and although the clinic was not fully used, 11% more patients were seen without additional costs.

From the *Sydney Sexual Health Centre, South East Sydney Local Health District, Sydney Australia; †Sexual Health and Blood Borne Virus Unit, Department of Health, Northern Territory, Australia; ‡The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia; and §School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of NSW, Kensington, NSW

Conflict of interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Sources of support: Nil.

Correspondence: Vickie Knight, MHSEd, PO Box 1614, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia. E-mail:

Received for publication February 17, 2012, and accepted August 10, 2012.

© Copyright 2013 American Sexually Transmitted Diseases Association