Sexually Transmitted Diseases

Skip Navigation LinksHome > August 2006 - Volume 33 - Issue 8 > Two Methods of Self-Sampling Compared to Clinician Sampling...
Sexually Transmitted Diseases:
doi: 10.1097/01.olq.0000204671.62529.1f

Two Methods of Self-Sampling Compared to Clinician Sampling to Detect Reproductive Tract Infections in Gugulethu, South Africa

van de Wijgert, Janneke PhD*†; Altini, Lydia MBChB‡; Jones, Heidi MPH*; de Kock, Alana MA‡; Young, Taryn MMED‡§; Williamson, Anna-Lise PhD∥; Hoosen, Anwar FCPath¶; Coetzee, Nicol FCPHM‡#

Collapse Box


Objectives: To assess the validity, feasibility, and acceptability of 2 methods of self-sampling compared to clinician sampling during a speculum examination.

Goal: To improve screening for reproductive tract infections (RTIs) in resource-poor settings.

Study Design: In a public clinic in Cape Town, 450 women underwent a speculum examination and were randomized to self-sample with either a tampon or vaginal swabs. All specimens were tested for the same pathogens using the same diagnostic tests.

Results: Self-sampling resulted in satisfactory validity for N gonorrhoeae, C trachomatis, bacterial vaginosis, and Candida species (tampons and swabs) and high-risk human papillomavirus (swabs only) when tested with molecular tests or microscopy, but not for T vaginalis by culture. Self-sampling was feasible and acceptable, but some women preferred speculum examinations, which allow the clinician to view the vagina and cervix.

Conclusions: Although self-sampling should not replace speculum examinations in all circumstances, it should be explored further as an RTI screening strategy.

© Copyright 2006 American Sexually Transmitted Diseases Association


Article Tools


Article Level Metrics