Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print Collections For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > February 15, 2008 - Volume 33 - Issue 4S > Clinical Practice Implications of the Bone and Joint Decade...
You could be reading the full-text of this article now...
If you have access to this article through your institution, you can view this article in OvidSP.
Spine:
15 February 2008 - Volume 33 - Issue 4S - pp S199-S213
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181644641
Implications and Recommendations From the Neck Pain Task Force

Clinical Practice Implications of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders: From Concepts and Findings to Recommendations

Guzman, Jaime MD, MSc, FRCPC(C); Haldeman, Scott DC, MD, PhD; Carroll, Linda J. PhD; Carragee, Eugene J. MD, FACS; Hurwitz, Eric L. DC, PhD; Peloso, Paul MD, MSc, FRCP(C); Nordin, Margareta PT, Dr Med Sc; Cassidy, J David DC, PhD, Dr Med Sc; Holm, Lena W. Dr Med Sc; Côté, Pierre DC, PhD; van der Velde, Gabrielle DC; Hogg-Johnson, Sheilah PhD

Collapse Box

Abstract

Study Design. Best evidence synthesis.

Objective. To provide evidence-based guidance to primary care clinicians about how to best assess and treat patients with neck pain.

Summary of Background Data. There is a need to translate the results of clinical and epidemiologic studies into meaningful and practical information for clinicians.

Methods. Based on best evidence syntheses of published studies on the risk, prognosis, assessment, and management of people with neck pain and its associated disorders, plus additional research projects and focused literature reviews reported in this supplement, the 12-member multidisciplinary Scientific Secretariat of the Neck Pain Task Force followed a 4-step approach to develop practical guidance for clinicians.

Results. The Neck Pain Task Force recommends that people seeking care for neck pain should be triaged into 4 groups: Grade I neck pain with no signs of major pathology and no or little interference with daily activities; Grade II neck pain with no signs of major pathology, but interference with daily activities; Grade III neck pain with neurologic signs of nerve compression; Grade IV neck pain with signs of major pathology. In the emergency room after blunt trauma to the neck, triage should be based on the NEXUS criteria or the Canadian C-spine rule. Those with a high risk of fracture should be further investigated with plain radiographs and/or CT-scan. In ambulatory primary care, triage should be based on history and physical examination alone, including screening for red flags and neurologic examination for signs of radiculopathy. Exercises and mobilization have been shown to provide some degree of short-term relief of Grade I or Grade II neck pain after a motor vehicle collision. Exercises, mobilization, manipulation, analgesics, acupuncture, and low-level laser have been shown to provide some degree of short-term relief of Grade I or Grade II neck pain without trauma. Those with confirmed Grade III and severe persistent radicular symptoms might benefit from corticosteroid injections or surgery. Those with confirmed Grade IV neck pain require management specific to the diagnosed pathology.

Conclusion. The best available evidence suggests initial assessment for neck pain should focus on triage into 4 grades, and those with common neck pain (Grade I and Grade II) might be offered the listed noninvasive treatments if short-term relief is desired.

© 2008 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Login




Help

Forgot Password?

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.